Search

Left-sided spatial neglect is a very common and challenging issue after right-hemispheric stroke, which strongly and negatively affects daily living behavior and recovery of stroke survivors. The mechanisms underlying recovery of spatial neglect remain controversial, particularly regarding the involvement of the intact, contralesional hemisphere, with potential contributions ranging from maladaptive to compensatory. In the present prospective, observational study, we assessed neglect severity in 54 right-hemispheric stroke patients (32 male; 22 female) at admission to and discharge from inpatient neurorehabilitation. We demonstrate that the interaction of initial neglect severity and spared white matter (dis)connectivity resulting from individual lesions (as assessed by diffusion tensor imaging, DTI) explains a significant portion of the variability of poststroke neglect recovery. In mildly impaired patients, spared structural connectivity within the lesioned hemisphere is sufficient to attain good recovery. Conversely, in patients with severe impairment, successful recovery critically depends on structural connectivity within the intact hemisphere and between hemispheres. These distinct patterns, mediated by their respective white matter connections, may help to reconcile the dichotomous perspectives regarding the role of the contralesional hemisphere as exclusively compensatory or not. Instead, they suggest a unified viewpoint wherein the contralesional hemisphere can - but must not necessarily - assume a compensatory role. This would depend on initial impairment severity and on the available, spared structural connectivity. In the future, our findings could serve as a prognostic biomarker for neglect recovery and guide patient-tailored therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In everyday life, information from different cognitive domains—such as visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition—needs to be integrated between different brain regions. Early models suggested that completely segregated brain networks control these three cognitive domains. However, more recent accounts, mainly based on neuroimaging data in healthy participants, indicate that different tasks lead to specific patterns of activation within the same, higher-order and 'multiple-demand' network. If so, then a lesion to critical substrates of this common network should determine a concomitant impairment in all three cognitive domains. The aim of the present study was to critically investigate this hypothesis, i.e. to identify focal stroke lesions within the network that can concomitantly affect visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition. We studied an unselected sample of 60 first-ever right-hemispheric, subacute stroke patients using a data-driven, bottom-up approach. Patients performed 12 standardized neuropsychological and oculomotor tests, four per cognitive domain. A principal component analysis revealed a strong relationship between all three cognitive domains: 10 of 12 tests loaded on a first, common component. Analysis of the neuroanatomical lesion correlates using different approaches (i.e. voxel-based and tractwise lesion-symptom mapping, disconnectome maps) provided convergent evidence on the association between severe impairment of this common component and lesions at the intersection of superior longitudinal fasciculus II and III, frontal aslant tract and, to a lesser extent, the putamen and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Moreover, patients with a lesion involving this region were significantly more impaired in daily living cognition, which provides an ecological validation of our results. A probabilistic functional atlas of the multiple-demand network was performed to confirm the potential relationship between patients' lesion substrates and observed cognitive impairments as a function of the multiple-demand network connectivity disruption. These findings show, for the first time, that a lesion to a specific white matter crossroad can determine a concurrent breakdown in all three considered cognitive domains. Our results support the multiple-demand network model, proposing that different cognitive operations depend on specific collaborators and their interaction, within the same underlying neural network. Our findings also extend this hypothesis by showing (i) the contribution of superior longitudinal fasciculus and frontal aslant tract to the multiple-demand network; and (ii) a critical neuroanatomical intersection, crossed by a vast amount of long-range white matter tracts, many of which interconnect cortical areas of the multiple-demand network. The vulnerability of this crossroad to stroke has specific cognitive and clinical consequences; this has the potential to influence future rehabilitative approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) often exhibit difficulties with dexterity during the performance of activities of daily living (ADL), inter alia due to dysfunctional supplementary motor area (SMA). Combined intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over the SMA followed by video game-based training (VBT) may therefore improve dexterity related ADL. The VBT may induce high flow levels related to high performance during the training. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a combined iTBS-VBT intervention in persons with PD. Methods: A total of nine persons with PD (mean age 63.3 ± 8.76 years) with self-reported difficulties with dexterity related ADL were included in this pilot iTBS-VBT study. All participants received either iTBS or sham stimulation over the SMA followed by a 45-min VBT, three times a week for a total of three weeks. Feasibility was measured by means of the adherence rate and the system usability (System Usability Scale). Moreover, flow was measured after the last VBT session. Results: Adherence rate was excellent with 100%. High system usability scores (i.e., mean 80%, range 55–97.5) and a significant Spearman's correlation with the Flow State Scale (r =.762, p =.017) further point to the high feasibility of the VBT. Neither demographic variables nor difficulties in dexterity related ADL affected the usability of the VBT. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the high feasibility of a combined iTBS-VBT intervention. Moreover, the level of self-reported usability was related to flow experience. Whether this kind of combined iTBS-VBT intervention improves dexterity will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. Trial registration clincaltrials.gov NCT04699149, date of registration 1. June 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most of us can use our "mind's eye" to mentally visualize things that are not in our direct line of sight, an ability known as visual mental imagery. Extensive left temporal damage can impair patients' visual mental imagery experience, but the critical locus of lesion is unknown. Our recent meta-analysis of 27 fMRI studies of visual mental imagery highlighted a well-delimited region in the left lateral midfusiform gyrus, which was consistently activated during visual mental imagery, and which we called the Fusiform Imagery Node (FIN). Here, we describe the connectional anatomy of FIN in neurotypical participants and in RDS, a right-handed patient with an extensive occipito-temporal stroke in the left hemisphere. The stroke provoked right homonymous hemianopia, alexia without agraphia, and color anomia. Despite these deficits, RDS had normal subjective experience of visual mental imagery and reasonably preserved behavioral performance on tests of visual mental imagery of object shape, object color, letters, faces, and spatial relationships. We found that the FIN was spared by the lesion. We then assessed the connectional anatomy of the FIN in the MNI space and in the patient's native space, by visualizing the fibers of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) passing through the FIN. In both spaces, the ILF connected the FIN with the anterior temporal lobe, and the AF linked it with frontal regions. Our evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the FIN is a node of a brain network dedicated to voluntary visual mental imagery. The FIN could act as a bridge between visual information and semantic knowledge processed in the anterior temporal lobe and in the language circuits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the importance of studying brain anatomy and behavior in order to understand the relationship between the two. The authors agree with the idea that brain anatomy should be used as a tool for developing concepts about brain function, but emphasize that observing behavior is a necessary step in establishing anatomo-functional relations. The study presented in the article contributes causal evidence to the model of the multiple-demand network in the neurotypical brain, suggesting that different cognitive operations depend on the activity of a higher-order network. The authors also provide a connectogram showing the fibers running through the observed lesion clusters, further supporting their main conclusion. They argue against a simple ventral/dorsal dichotomy in brain systems and propose that separate cognitive functions emerge from the integrated functioning of distant brain areas supported by long-range white matter tracts. The article concludes by highlighting the contributions of Jules Dejerine and Augusta Dejerine-Klumpke in identifying and characterizing white matter tracts and emphasizing the importance of continuing to advance knowledge in this area. [Extracted from the article]

The literature suggests that neglect patients not only show impairments in directing attention toward the left, contralesional space, but also present with perseverative behavior. Moreover, previous studies described re‐fixations during visual search tasks, and interpreted this finding as an impairment of spatial working memory. The aim of the present study was to study re‐fixations and perseverations (i.e., recurrent re‐fixations to same locations) during free visual exploration, a task with high ecological validity. We hypothesized that: (1) neglect patient would perform re‐fixations more frequently than healthy controls within the right hemispace; and, (2) the re‐fixation behavior of neglect patients would be characterized by perseverative fixations. To test these hypotheses, we assessed 22 neglect patients and 23 healthy controls, measuring their eye movements during free exploration of naturalistic pictures. The results showed that neglect patients tend to re‐fixate locations within the ipsilesional hemispace when they freely explore naturalistic pictures. Importantly, the saliency of discrete locations within the pictures has a stronger influence on fixation behavior within the contralesional than within the ipsilesional hemispace in neglect patients. Finally, the results indicated that, for re‐fixations, saliency plays a more important role within the contralesional than the ipsilesional hemispace. Moreover, we found evidence that re‐fixation behavior of neglect patients is characterized by frequent recurrent re‐fixations back to the same spatial locations which may be interpreted as perseverations. Hence, with the present study, we could better elucidate the mechanism leading to re‐fixations and perseverative behavior during free visual exploration in neglect patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spatial neglect is a strong and negative predictor of general functional outcome after stroke, and its therapy remains a challenge. Whereas inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation over the contralesional, intact hemisphere has generally been shown to ameliorate neglect on a group level, a conspicuous variability of the effects at the individual level is typically observed. We aimed to assess the characteristics and determinants of the effects of inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect, identifying which patients would respond to this therapeutic approach and which not. To this end, we prospectively included 60 patients with a subacute right-hemispheric stroke. In 30 patients with spatial neglect, continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was applied over the left posterior parietal cortex in a randomized clinical trial, either in eight or 16 trains, or as sham stimulation. Thirty patients without neglect served as a control group. Neglect severity was measured with a neuropsychological test battery and the Catherine Bergego Scale, at admission to and at discharge from inpatient neurorehabilitation, as well as at 3 months follow-up. General functional outcome was assessed by means of the Functional Independence Measure and the Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale. The impact of clinical and demographic factors was evaluated, and the influence of lesion location and extension was assessed by means of voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. On a group level, both cTBS protocols (i.e. eight and 16 trains) significantly reduced neglect severity in both the Catherine Bergego Scale and the neuropsychological tests, at discharge and 3 months later. Furthermore, cTBS significantly improved general functional outcome. On an individual level, hierarchical cluster and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analyses revealed that the variability in the responses to cTBS is determined by the integrity of interhemispheric connections within the corpus callosum, in particular parieto-parietal connections. In cTBS responders, in whom neglect and general functional outcome were significantly improved, the corpus callosum was intact, whereas this was not the case in cTBS non-responders. Moreover, analyses based on the proportional recovery rule and the Maugeri predictive stroke recovery model showed that the recovery of neglect and of the activities of daily living was accelerated only in cTBS responders. Furthermore, the level of activities of daily living recovery of these neglect patients was brought close to the one of right-hemispheric control patients without neglect. Hence, in neglect patients with intact interhemispheric connectivity, cTBS over the contralesional posterior parietal cortex significantly improves and accelerates neglect recovery and, associated with it, general functional outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]