Search

Your search keyword '"Kimble, Mary"' showing total 162 results
Start Over Author "Kimble, Mary"
162 results on '"Kimble, Mary"'

3. A Changing Health Care Environment: Its Impact on UCSF Graduates' Practice Patterns and Perceptions.

Author

Sauer, Barbara L. and Koda-Kimble, Mary Anne

Abstract

A survey of 754 University of California at San Francisco doctoral pharmacy graduates from 1980 to 1994 investigated how managed care affected practice patterns and perceptions of the profession. Graduates generally remained satisfied with their education and were optimistic about the profession. Although managed care has created a stressful working environment, graduates are finding new opportunities to use their clinical expertise. (MSE)

Published
1998

4. Diabetes Care as an Active Learning Model of Postgraduate Education and Training for Pharmaceutical Care.

Author

Koda-Kimble, Mary Anne and Batz, Forrest R.

Abstract

In a University of California continuing pharmacy education course in diabetes care, practicing pharmacists lived as patients with diabetes for two days and role-played in small groups. One year later, participants reported making changes in their diabetes care-related practice, suggesting its effectiveness in improving practitioners' skill levels. (MSE)

Published
1994

5. Amebocyte production begins at stage 18 during embryogenesis in limulus polyphem us, the American horseshoe crab

Author

Coursey, Yvonne, Ahmad, Nina, McGee, Barbara M., Steimel, Nancy, and Kimble, Mary

Subjects
Horseshoe crabs -- Physiological aspects -- Analysis -- Research, Biological research -- Analysis -- Research -- Physiological aspects, Biology, Experimental -- Analysis -- Research -- Physiological aspects, Blood cells -- Physiological aspects -- Analysis -- Research, Host-bacteria relationships -- Research -- Analysis -- Physiological aspects, Gram-negative bacteria -- Physiological aspects -- Analysis -- Research, Developmental biology -- Research -- Physiological aspects -- Analysis, Biological sciences, Physiological aspects, Analysis, Research
Abstract

Abstract. Limulus polyphemus, the American horseshoe crab, has a single type of circulating blood cell, the granular amebocyte, which is the horseshoe crab's primary cellular defense against microbial infection. On [...]

Published
2003

15. Pharmaceutical Education and the Pharmacy Workforce. Should We Expand Our Programs? Report of the Argus Commission 1999-2000.

Author

Cohen, Jordan L., Kabat, Hugh F., Knapp, David A., Koda-Kimble, Mary Anne, and Rutledge, Charles O.

Abstract

Because of the remarkable increase in demand for medications, this article urges the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) to provide its member schools with necessary information so that they may move rapidly to increase capacity to educate pharmacists. Offers six recommendations related to increasing educational capacity and educating pharmacists on supervision of drug distribution systems. (EV)

Published
2000

17. Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects

Author

Fred Gould; Richard M. Amasino; Dominique Brossard; C. Robin Buell; Richard A. Dixon; José B. Falck-Zepeda; Michael A. Gallo; Ken Giller; Leland Glenna; Timothy S. Griffin; Bruce R. Hamaker; Peter M. Kareiva; Daniel Magraw; Carol Mallory-Smith; Kevin Pixley; Elizabeth P. Ransom; Michael Rodemeyer; David M. Stelly; C. Neal Stewart; Robert J.Whitaker; Kara N. Laney; Janet M.Mulligan; Jenna Briscoe; Samuel Crowell; Maria Oria; Robin A. Schoen; Norman Grossblatt; Charles W. Rice; Peggy F. Barlett; Camilla Yandoc Ables; Harold L. Bergman; Susan Capalbo; Gail Czarnecki-Maulden; Richard A. Dixon; Gebisa Ejeta; Robert B. Goldberg; Fred Gould; Gary F. Hartnell; Gene Hugoson; Molly M. Jahn; Robbin S. Johnson; James W. Jones; A.G. Kawamura; Stephen S. Kelley; Julia L. Kornegay; Jim E. Riviere; Roger A. Sedjo; Kathleen Segerson; Mercedes Vazquez-Añon; Cutberto Garza; Cheryl A. M. Anderson; Patsy M. Brannon; Sharon M. Donovan; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Alice H. Lichtenstein; Joanne R. Lupton; James M. Ntambi; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; A. Catharine Ross; Mary T. Story; Katherine L. Tucker; Connie M.Weaver; Ann L. Yaktine; Anna Bury; Bernice Chu; Heather Cook; Geraldine Kennedo; Renee Gethers; Amanda Nguyen; Maria Oria; Lynn Parker; Meghan Quirk; Ambar Saeed; Dara Shefska; Leslie Sim; Alice Vorosmarti; James P. Collins; Enriqueta C. Bond; Roger D. Cone; Nancy D. Connell; Joseph R. Ecker; Sarah C.R. Elgin; Linda G. Griffith; Elizabeth Heitman; Richard A. Johnson; Judith Kimble; Mary E.Maxon; Jill P.Mesirov; Karen E. Nelson; Claire Pomeroy; Mary E. Power; Margaret Riley; Lana Skirboll; Janis C.Weeks; Frances E. Sharples; Jo L. Husbands; Jay B. Labov; Lida Anestidou; Katherine W. Bowman; Marilee K. Shelton-Davenport; Keegan Sawyer; Audrey Thevenon; Bethelhem M.Mekasha; Angela Kolesnikova; Vanessa Lester; Jenna Ogilvie; Aanika Senn, Committee on Genetically Engineered Crops: Past Experience and Future Prospects; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-7154 Falck-Zepeda, Jose, Fred Gould; Richard M. Amasino; Dominique Brossard; C. Robin Buell; Richard A. Dixon; José B. Falck-Zepeda; Michael A. Gallo; Ken Giller; Leland Glenna; Timothy S. Griffin; Bruce R. Hamaker; Peter M. Kareiva; Daniel Magraw; Carol Mallory-Smith; Kevin Pixley; Elizabeth P. Ransom; Michael Rodemeyer; David M. Stelly; C. Neal Stewart; Robert J.Whitaker; Kara N. Laney; Janet M.Mulligan; Jenna Briscoe; Samuel Crowell; Maria Oria; Robin A. Schoen; Norman Grossblatt; Charles W. Rice; Peggy F. Barlett; Camilla Yandoc Ables; Harold L. Bergman; Susan Capalbo; Gail Czarnecki-Maulden; Richard A. Dixon; Gebisa Ejeta; Robert B. Goldberg; Fred Gould; Gary F. Hartnell; Gene Hugoson; Molly M. Jahn; Robbin S. Johnson; James W. Jones; A.G. Kawamura; Stephen S. Kelley; Julia L. Kornegay; Jim E. Riviere; Roger A. Sedjo; Kathleen Segerson; Mercedes Vazquez-Añon; Cutberto Garza; Cheryl A. M. Anderson; Patsy M. Brannon; Sharon M. Donovan; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Alice H. Lichtenstein; Joanne R. Lupton; James M. Ntambi; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; A. Catharine Ross; Mary T. Story; Katherine L. Tucker; Connie M.Weaver; Ann L. Yaktine; Anna Bury; Bernice Chu; Heather Cook; Geraldine Kennedo; Renee Gethers; Amanda Nguyen; Maria Oria; Lynn Parker; Meghan Quirk; Ambar Saeed; Dara Shefska; Leslie Sim; Alice Vorosmarti; James P. Collins; Enriqueta C. Bond; Roger D. Cone; Nancy D. Connell; Joseph R. Ecker; Sarah C.R. Elgin; Linda G. Griffith; Elizabeth Heitman; Richard A. Johnson; Judith Kimble; Mary E.Maxon; Jill P.Mesirov; Karen E. Nelson; Claire Pomeroy; Mary E. Power; Margaret Riley; Lana Skirboll; Janis C.Weeks; Frances E. Sharples; Jo L. Husbands; Jay B. Labov; Lida Anestidou; Katherine W. Bowman; Marilee K. Shelton-Davenport; Keegan Sawyer; Audrey Thevenon; Bethelhem M.Mekasha; Angela Kolesnikova; Vanessa Lester; Jenna Ogilvie; Aanika Senn, Committee on Genetically Engineered Crops: Past Experience and Future Prospects; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-7154 Falck-Zepeda, Jose

Abstract

PR, IFPRI5; PBS, EPTD, Genetically engineered (GE) crops were first introduced commercially in the 1990s. After two decades of production, some groups and individuals remain critical of the technology based on their concerns about possible adverse effects on human health, the environment, and ethical considerations. At the same time, others are concerned that the technology is not reaching its potential to improve human health and the environment because of stringent regulations and reduced public funding to develop products offering more benefits to society. While the debate about these and other questions related to the genetic engineering techniques of the first 20 years goes on, emerging genetic-engineering technologies are adding new complexities to the conversation.

Published
2016

18. Preparing Women for the Profession: A Course Using Structured Role-Model Analysis.

Author

Sauer, Barbara L. and Koda-Kimble, Mary Anne

Abstract

A course was developed at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Pharmacy, addressing issues facing women. Female students discussed career planning and management, the complexities of balancing career and family life, and career commitment. The technique of structured role-model analysis was used. (Author/MLW)

Published
1989

50. Meiosis and early cleavage in Drosophila melanogaster eggs: Effects of the claret-non-disjunctional mutation

Author

Kimble, Mary and Church, Kathleen

Abstract

The claret-non-disjunctional (cand) mutation is a female-specific mutation in Drosophila melanogaster, which causes a high frequency of mortality (89–90 %) in eggs laid by the homozygous females. Among the progeny that survive to the adult stage, greater than 50 % are aneuploid and/ or mosaic for the X and number 4 chromosomes. The genetic studies of cand indicate that it is homologous to the claret mutation (ca-simulans) in Drosophila simulons. The cytological effect of the cand mutation on meiosis I and the early cleavage divisions has been observed at the light microscope level in stage 14 ovarian and fertilized uterine eggs, respectively. Four classes of metaphase I figures were observed. These include those with: (1) two or more spindles; (2) spindles that were abnormally wide and the bivalents widely separated; (3) unipolar spindles; and (4) apparently normal bipolar spindles. The three abnormal classes of metaphase I figures included 80 % of the eggs examined at this stage. Among the cleavage stage eggs examined 69 % showed highly abnormal mitotic figures, including multipolar spindles, and the nuclei in these eggs were found in clusters, rather than dispersed throughout the ooplasm. In addition to the cytological abnormalities observed, 17–23 % of the eggs produced by the cand females showed morphological abnormalities. These abnormalities included eggs having three or four dorsal filaments, eggs that had a truncated shape, and abnormally small eggs. These abnormalities may not be an aspect of the cand syndrome, but they are due to recessive genes located on the third chromosome. Although the cand and ca-simulans mutations both affect the formation of the spindle apparatus during meiosis and the early cleavage divisions, the effects of these two mutations differ considerably in detail. The effect of the ca-simulans mutation appears to be more severe than the effect of cand. A model to explain the relationship between the effect of the cand mutation on meiosis I and the early cleavage divisions is presented, and evidence to support the model is discussed.

Published
1983
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results