Search

The amphibian metamorphosis assay (AMA) is an in vivo screen to assess potential interactions of chemicals with the amphibian thyroid system. Tadpoles are exposed for 21-days, then assessed for development and growth after 7 days and at test termination. This paper presents data from studies performed to satisfy test orders from the US EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Data Evaluation Records were used to collate the control variability and performance of biological endpoints in AMAs conducted in different laboratories, then supplemented with recent studies. We examine the statistical power of AMA endpoint analysis and assess whether historical control data (HCD) can assist evidence-based interpretation of the endpoints, with 52 studies from 7 different laboratories. HCD can be used to understand assay performance post validation. The analysis identifies some need for flexibility in the interpretation of the Test Guidelines' performance criteria, including latitude with analytical variability and statistical analysis of late-stage animals. Additionally, more guidance is suggested for feed regiments and the selection criteria for batches of animals to initiate the assay. Potential Guideline refinements that improve interpretation of the data and have potential to reduce the number of vertebrate animals used in the conduct of AMAs are identified and discussed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The following author initials are employed by the private sector: JRW, ACB, ZG, LL, and VM., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

According to the World Health Organisation and European Commission definitions, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they show adverse effects, have endocrine activity and the adverse effects are a consequence of the endocrine activity (using a weight-of-evidence approach based on biological plausibility), unless the adverse effects are not relevant to humans or non-target organisms at the (sub)population level. To date, there is no decision logic on how to establish endocrine disruption via the thyroid modality in non-mammalian vertebrates. This paper describes an evidence-based decision logic compliant with the integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) concept, to identify thyroid-mediated effect patterns in aquatic vertebrates using amphibians as relevant models for thyroid disruption assessment. The decision logic includes existing test guidelines and methods and proposes detailed considerations on how to select relevant assays and interpret the findings. If the mammalian dataset used as the starting point indicates no thyroid concern, the Xenopus Eleutheroembryonic Thyroid Assay allows checking out thyroid-mediated activity in non-mammalian vertebrates, whereas the Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay or its extended, fixed termination stage variant inform on both thyroid-mediated activity and potentially population-relevant adversity. In evaluating findings, the response patterns of all assay endpoints are considered, including the direction of changes. Thyroid-mediated effect patterns identified at the individual level in the amphibian tests are followed by mode-of-action and population relevance assessments. Finally, all data are considered in an overarching weight-of-evidence evaluation. The logic has been designed generically and can be adapted, e.g. to accommodate fish tests once available for thyroid disruption assessments. It also ensures that all scientifically relevant information is considered, and that animal testing is minimised. The proposed decision logic can be included in regulatory assessments to facilitate the conclusion on whether substances meet the endocrine disruptor definition for the thyroid modality in non-mammalian vertebrates., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Administrative support, article publishing charges and the fees for writing assistance were provided by CropLife Europe. The employment affiliation of the authors is listed on the cover page. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The Xenopus Eleutheroembryonic Thyroid Assay (XETA) was recently published as an OECD Test Guideline for detecting chemicals acting on the thyroid axis. However, the OECD validation did not cover all mechanisms that can potentially be detected by the XETA. This study was therefore initiated to investigate and consolidate the applicability domain of the XETA regarding the following mechanisms: thyroid hormone receptor (THR) agonism, sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) inhibition, thyroperoxidase (TPO) inhibition, deiodinase (DIO) inhibition, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonism, and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) induction. In total, 22 chemicals identified as thyroid-active or -inactive in Amphibian Metamorphosis Assays (AMAs) were tested using the XETA OECD Test Guideline. The comparison showed that both assays are highly concordant in identifying chemicals with mechanisms of action related to THR agonism, DIO inhibition, and GR agonism. They also consistently identified the UDPGT inducers as thyroid inactive. NIS inhibition, investigated using sodium perchlorate, was not detected in the XETA. TPO inhibition requires further mechanistic investigations as the reference chemicals tested resulted in opposing response directions in the XETA and AMA. This study contributes refining the applicability domain of the XETA, thereby helping to clarify the conditions where it can be used as an ethical alternative to the AMA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Du Pasquier, Benoit Salinier, Gregory Lemkine, Barbara Robin-Duchesne reports financial support was provided by CropLife Europe. Laurent Lagadic reports a relationship with Bayer CropScience AG that includes: employment. This work was supported by CropLife Europe as a Company Investment Project and research and development funds from Corteva Agriscience USA. The employment affiliation of the authors is listed on the cover page. BRD, BS, DDP and GL are affiliated to Laboratoire WatchFrog, developer of the Xenopus Eleutheroembryonic Thyroid Assay (XETA) and coordinator of the validation of OECD TG 248. AJ, JL, JRW, KKC, LL, LW and OK are affiliated to companies that manufacture agrochemicals, some of which having been used in the present study. There are no other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vitellogenin (VTG) is a biomarker for possible endocrine activity of chemicals acting via the estrogen, androgen, or steroidogenesis pathways. VTG is assessed in standardised fish guideline studies conducted for regulatory safety assessment of chemicals. VTG data can be highly variable leading to concerns for potential equivocal, false positive and/or negative outcomes. Consequently, additional fish testing may be required to address uncertainties in the VTG response, and possibly erroneous/missed identification of endocrine activity. To better understand the technical challenges of VTG assessment and reporting for regulatory purposes, a survey was sent to 27 testing laboratories performing these analyses. The survey results from 16 respondents (6 from the UK, 3 from the USA, and 7 from the EU) were analysed and discussed in a follow-up webinar. High variability in background VTG concentrations was widely acknowledged and thought to be associated with fish batch, husbandry, laboratory practices, and several methodological aspects. These include sample collection and storage, VTG quantification, data handling, and the benchmarks used for data acceptability. Information gathered in the survey provides a basis for improving and harmonizing the measurement of VTG in fish, and an opportunity to reassess the suitability of current acceptability criteria in test guidelines., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rebeccca J Brown, Grace Panter reports financial support was provided by Bayer AG. E.R. Salinas, L. Weltje, J.R. Wheeler, Y. Wolf, B. Holmes, and L. Lagadic are affiliated to companies that develop and manufacture agrochemicals. Authors’ affiliations do not imply competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vitellogenin (VTG), a biomarker for endocrine activity, is a mechanistic component of the regulatory assessment of potential endocrine-disrupting properties of chemicals. This review of VTG data is based on changes reported for 106 substances in standard fish species. High intra-study and inter-laboratory variability in VTG concentrations was confirmed, as well as discrepancies in interpretation of results based on large differences between fish in the dilution water versus solvent control, or due to the presence of outlier measurements. VTG responses in fish were ranked against predictions for estrogen receptor agonist activity and aromatase inhibition from bioactivity model output and ToxCast in vitro assay results, respectively. These endocrine mechanisms explained most of the VTG responses in the absence of systemic toxicity, the magnitude of the VTG response being proportional to the in vitro potency. Interpretation of the VTG data was sometimes confounded by an alternative endocrine mechanism of action. There was evidence for both false positive and negative responses for VTG synthesis, but overall, it was rare for substances without endocrine activity in vitro to cause a concentration-dependent VTG response in fish in the absence of systemic toxicity. To increase confidence in the VTG results, we recommend improvements in the VTG measurement methodologies and greater transparency in reporting of VTG data (including quality control criteria for assay performance). This review supports the application of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) by demonstrating that endocrine activity in vitro from mammalian cell lines is predictive for in vivo VTG response in fish, suggesting that in vitro mechanistic data could be used more broadly in decision-making to help reduce animal testing., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The employment affiliation of the authors is listed on the cover page. Rebecca J. Brown and Grace H. Panter are affiliated to wca environment Ltd., an independent consultancy providing objective advice on the risk assessment of chemicals in the environment and the workplace. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rebecca J Brown and Grace H. Panter both report financial support was provided by Bayer AG. Natalie Burden is affiliated to NC3Rs, an independent scientific organisation, tasked by Government with supporting the UK science base through the application of the 3Rs. Edward R. Salinas, Lennart Weltje, James R. Wheeler, Yvonne Wolf, and Laurent Lagadic are affiliated to companies that develop and manufacture agrochemicals, some of which having been included in the present review., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The toxicity and ecotoxicity of pesticide active ingredients are evaluated by a number of standardized test methods using vertebrate animals. These standard test methods are required under various regulatory programs for the registration of pesticides. Over the past two decades, additional test methods have been developed with endpoints that are responsive to endocrine activity and subsequent adverse effects. This article examines the available test methods and their endpoints that are relevant to an assessment of endocrine-disrupting properties of pesticides. Furthermore, the article highlights how weight-of-evidence approaches should be applied to determine whether an adverse response in (eco)toxicity tests is caused by an endocrine mechanism of action. The large number of endpoints in the current testing paradigms for pesticides make it unlikely that endocrine activity and adversity is being overlooked. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1089-1109. © 2023 Bayer CropScience and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)., (© 2023 Bayer CropScience and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).)

A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on in vitro anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from in vivo studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin in vitro assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.

Multiple in vivo test guidelines focusing on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenesis pathways have been developed and validated for mammals, amphibians, or fish. However, these tests are resource-intensive and often use a large number of laboratory animals. Developing alternatives for in vivo tests is consistent with the replacement, reduction, and refinement principles for animal welfare considerations, which are supported by increasing mandates to move toward an "animal-free" testing paradigm worldwide. New approach methodologies (NAMs) hold great promise to identify molecular, cellular, and tissue changes that can be used to predict effects reliably and more efficiently at the individual level (and potentially on populations) while reducing the number of animals used in (eco)toxicological testing for endocrine disruption. In a collaborative effort, experts from government, academia, and industry met in 2020 to discuss the current challenges of testing for endocrine activity assessment for fish and amphibians. Continuing this cross-sector initiative, our review focuses on the current state of the science regarding the use of NAMs to identify chemical-induced endocrine effects. The present study highlights the challenges of using NAMs for safety assessment and what work is needed to reduce their uncertainties and increase their acceptance in regulatory processes. We have reviewed the current NAMs available for endocrine activity assessment including in silico, in vitro, and eleutheroembryo models. New approach methodologies can be integrated as part of a weight-of-evidence approach for hazard or risk assessment using the adverse outcome pathway framework. The development and utilization of NAMs not only allows for replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing but can also provide robust and fit-for-purpose methods to identify chemicals acting via endocrine mechanisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:757-777. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC., (© 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.)