Search

The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce risks of clinical events in patients with heart failure (HF), with early and sustained benefits regardless of ejection fraction, diabetic status, and care setting. As part and parcel of the modern foundational HF therapy, clinicians should be familiar with these drugs, in order to implement their use and limit the potential adverse effects. We present an up-to-date review of current evidence and a practical guide for the prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HF, highlighting important elements for patient selection, treatment initiation, dosing, and problem solving.

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) have found increasing use in clinical practice over the years, proving, when used in high-risk populations, to facilitate the diagnosis of bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias requiring treatment. Experience with heart failure patients undergoing pacemaker (PMK) or implantable defibrillator (ICD) implantation, which allow for continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and transthoracic impedance assessment, has made it possible to identify predictors of heart failure flare-ups. In this context, the use of telemonitoring has been shown to ensure better management of patients with heart failure. These benefits cannot be assessed to date in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35% who have no indication for PMK or ICD implantation. This population has been shown to have a significant incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. In addition, a significant number of cerebrovascular events are observed in this population, largely attributable to the high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). In this population, the occurrence of AF has also been shown to have a negative impact on patients’ prognosis; at the same time, a rhythm control strategy has been shown to be more beneficial in this area than a rate control strategy. Studies also suggest arrhythmias have a negative impact on the cognitive status and quality of life of heart failure patients. These reasons could justify the implantation of ICMs equipped with telemonitoring systems in heart failure patients. The information provided by the monitoring system, if properly managed, could bring benefits in terms of prognosis and quality of life along with a reduction in economic costs. We will try here, by answering a few questions, to assess whether there is an indication for ICM in heart failure, which patients should be candidates and how these patients should be managed.

Patients with clinically established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are at a very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. An adequate management of risk factors and the implementation of healthy behaviours significantly decrease the risk of unfavourable clinical outcomes and future cardiovascular events, including death. Patients discharged after an acute coronary syndrome should be managed according to their individual risk level in order to ensure the appropriate treatment. Nevertheless, care pathways should also take into consideration the available resources and the logistical/structural aspects. In this setting, cardiac rehabilitation is prosed as a multidisciplinary approach to improving daily function and reducing cardiovascular risk factors. The organization of a network with the involvement of different medical and non-medical figures is essential to ensure successful outcomes and expected cost-effectiveness.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a complex syndrome and a relevant problem of public health due to its large incidence and prevalence and to the high costs for its management. The hallmark of CKD, the progressive reduction in the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), is strongly associated with an increase in cardiovascular events, such as fatal and non-fatal heart attack, stroke and heart failure, and mortality. Therefore, clinicians should pay any effort for preventing or slowing down the decline of renal function in order to reduce not only the occurrence of critical renal events (the need for dialysis or renal transplantation, among the most dreadful) but also the incidence of cardiovascular events. Accordingly, an early diagnosis and a targeted treatment in patients with kidney disease are crucial to reduce the evolution towards more advanced stages of the disease and the occurrence of complications. For a long time, the therapeutic approach to the majority of CKD patients was based on the strict control of risk factors, such as the diabetic disease and hypertension, together with the use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, particularly in the presence of albuminuria. Over time, this strategy proved to be only partially effective, since most CKD patients showed a progressive worsening of renal function. Gliflozins and incretins are novel anti-diabetic drugs that have been demonstrated to slow down the slope of eGFR reduction in patients with CKD, irrespective of diabetic status. Concurrently, these drugs showed to significantly impact cardiovascular prognosis reducing the incidence of clinical events. For their ability to act on a wide spectrum of disease, gliflozins and incretins are also called ‘cardio–nephro–metabolic’ drugs.

There is still the need to lower LDL-c, although the use of statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or familial hypercholesterolaemia are treated with statins at maximum tolerated dose, with or without further lipid-lowering drugs, but very often, we can’t reach the goal, so bempedoic acid treatment lead to a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, in different groups of patients, with a favourable safety profile.

Background Large randomized clinical trials demonstrated that sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduced adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with both reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. Despite the high potential to change clinical practice, the strict trial selection criteria might reduce external validity of these findings. Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the proportion of outpatients with HF that would be eligible for SGLT2 inhibitors across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a contemporary real-world population. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients with chronic stable HF followed-up at the outpatient clinic of our institution. HFrEF (LVEF 40%), Eligibility to SGLT2 inhibitors was based both strict and pragmatic (most likely influencing treatment decisions in clinical practice) EMPEROR- Preserved inclusion/exclusion criteria (empagliflozin). Results A total of 642 HF patients (441 HFrEF; 201 HFpEF) was studied. Among HFrEF patients, according to the major inclusion and exclusion criteria from DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, 198 (45%) patients would be candidates for initiation of both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 61 (14%) would be eligible only to dapagliflozin and 23 (5%) only to empagliflozin, On the other hand, in HFpEF patients, 125 (62%) patients would be candidates for initiation of empagliflozin based on the EMPEROR-Preserved trial selection criteria. No significant differences were found between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in both HFrEF (p=0.23) and HFpEF (p=0.37). In patients not suitable for gliflozins treatment the major determinant of ineligibility was the failure to achieve the predefined NTproBNP inclusion threshold. Excluding NTproBNP as per FDA label criteria, dapagliflozin eligibility increased to 86%. Similarly, applying EMPEROR-Preserved criteria most likely influencing treatment decisions in clinical practice (symptomatic HF; eGFR Conclusions In our real-world analysis the proportion of HF patients potentially candidate for initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors is consistent across the entire spectrum of LVEF. Our findings might herald an extensive use of gliflozins in HF treatment, with a consequent strong beneficial impact on cardiovascular outcomes in eligible patients.

The 2021 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on the diagnosis and therapy of heart failure (HF) introduced relevant changes in the pharmacological treatment of chronic HF. Among these, certainly the most significant was the introduction in the therapeutic flow-chart (with the highest recommendation level) of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. In fact, SGLT2 inhibitors are responsible for major paradigm shifts in the care of patients with or at high risk for HF, progression of chronic kidney disease, or both. SGLT2 inhibition demonstrated to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF over a wide range of ejection fractions, regardless of diabetic status, and have a strong nephroprotective effect. There are several important interactions between heart disease and kidneys disease. Indeed, acute or chronic dysfunction of the heart or kidneys can induce acute or chronic dysfunction in the other organ. The term ‘cardiorenal syndrome’ has been applied to these interactions. Since kidneys dysfunction in the setting of HF has a strong prognostic relevance, drugs that can slow down the decline of renal function are of utmost importance. Here, we discuss about the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on the kidneys function in patients with HF and how these effects can improve both renal and cardiovascular outcomes.

Background: Glucocorticoid therapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic option in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to focus on the impact of relevant clinical and laboratory factors on the protective effect of glucocorticoids on mortality. Methods: A sub-analysis was performed of the multicenter Cardio-COVID-Italy registry, enrolling consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to 13 Italian cardiology units between 01 March 2020 and 09 April 2020. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 706 COVID-19 patients were included (349 treated with glucocorticoids, 357 not treated with glucocorticoids). After adjustment for relevant covariates, use of glucocorticoids was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26–0.72; p = 0.001). A significant interaction was observed between the protective effect of glucocorticoids on mortality and PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission (p = 0.042), oxygen saturation on admission (p = 0.017), and peak CRP (0.023). Such protective effects of glucocorticoids were mainly observed in patients with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (100 mg/L). Conclusions: The protective effects of glucocorticoids on mortality in COVID-19 were more evident among patients with worse respiratory parameters and higher systemic inflammation.

Several risk factors have been identified to predict worse outcomes in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Machine learning algorithms represent a novel approach to identifying a prediction model with a good discriminatory capacity to be easily used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to obtain a risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronavirus disease infection (COVID-19) based on a limited number of features collected at hospital admission.We studied an Italian cohort of consecutive adult Caucasian patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized in 13 cardiology units during Spring 2020. The Lasso procedure was used to select the most relevant covariates. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set containing 80% of the data, used for estimating the model, and a test set with the remaining 20%. A Random Forest modeled in-hospital mortality with the selected set of covariates: its accuracy was measured by means of the ROC curve, obtaining AUC, sensitivity, specificity and related 95% confidence interval (CI). This model was then compared with the one obtained by the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and with logistic regression. Finally, to understand if each model has the same performance in the training and test set, the two AUCs were compared using the DeLong's test. Among 701 patients enrolled (mean age 67.2 ± 13.2 years, 69.5% male individuals), 165 (23.5%) died during a median hospitalization of 15 (IQR, 9-24) days. Variables selected by the Lasso procedure were: age, oxygen saturation, PaO2/FiO2, creatinine clearance and elevated troponin. Compared with those who survived, deceased patients were older, had a lower blood oxygenation, lower creatinine clearance levels and higher prevalence of elevated troponin (all P 0.001). The best performance out of the samples was provided by Random Forest with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88) and a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.58-1.00). Moreover, Random Forest was the unique model that provided similar performance in sample and out of sample (DeLong test P = 0.78).In a large COVID-19 population, we showed that a customizable machine learning-based score derived from clinical variables is feasible and effective for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

High blood pressure (BP) is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and at the same time represents its most frequent complication. High BP is an independent risk factor for advanced CKD; on the other hand, at least 40% of patients with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and virtually all patients with GFR

Background Several ECG voltage criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Notably, ECG criteria have been historically validated in concentric LVH but not in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), wherein the hypertrophy pattern is typically asymmetric. Objectives The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of ECG voltage criteria for LVH diagnosis in the HCM population. Material and methods The electrocardiograms of 92 HCM patients and 41 sex- and age-matched controls were evaluated with the most frequently used ECG voltage criteria for LVH diagnosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MRI) was performed in HCM and controls in order to quantify LVH and its distribution. Results In the HCM population, the maximal diagnostic accuracy was achieved by Amplitude total and Amplitude total product criteria (58% for both), while the Cornell Voltage best performed in septal HCM (62%), the Sokolov in aVL and Gubner criteria in apical HCM (79% for both) and the Cornell Voltage and Product in anterior HCM (86% for both). All the ECG voltage criteria showed a poor correlation with left ventricular mass and maximal thickness measured by cardiac MRI. Conclusions In our study, only a few ECG voltage criteria used for the detection of LVH in clinical practice showed an acceptable performance in the HCM population. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of ECG for LVH detection in HCM patients.

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is an endocrine and paracrine organ constituted by a layer of adipose tissue directly located between the myocardium and visceral pericardium. Under physiological conditions, EAT exerts protective effects of brown-like fat characteristics, metabolizing excess fatty acids, and secreting anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic cytokines. In certain pathological conditions, EAT acquires a proatherogenic transcriptional profile resulting in increased synthesis of biologically active adipocytokines with proinflammatory properties, promoting oxidative stress, and finally causing endothelial damage. The role of EAT in heart failure (HF) has been mainly limited to HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and related to the HFpEF obese phenotype. In HFpEF, EAT seems to acquire a proinflammatory profile and higher EAT values have been related to worse outcomes. Less data are available about the role of EAT in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Conversely, in HFrEF, EAT seems to play a nutritive role and lower values may correspond to the expression of a catabolic, adverse phenotype. As of now, there is evidence that the beneficial systemic cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 receptors-inhibitors (SGLT2-i) might be partially mediated by inducing favorable modifications on EAT. As such, EAT may represent a promising target organ for the development of new drugs to improve cardiovascular prognosis. Thus, an approach based on detailed phenotyping of cardiac structural alterations and distinctive biomolecular pathways may change the current scenario, leading towards a precision medicine model with specific therapeutic targets considering different individual profiles. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge about the biomolecular pathway of EAT in HF across the whole spectrum of ejection fraction, and to describe the potential of EAT as a therapeutic target in HF.

Data concerning the combined prognostic role of natriuretic peptide (NP) and troponin in patients with COVID-19 are lacking. The aim of the study is to evaluate the combined prognostic value of NPs and troponin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. From March 1, 2020 to April 9, 2020, consecutive patients with COVID-19 and available data on cardiac biomarkers at admission were recruited. Patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome were excluded. Troponin levels were defined as elevated when greater than the 99th percentile of normal values. NPs were considered elevated if above the limit for ruling in acute heart failure (HF). A total of 341 patients were included in this study, mean age 68 +/-& nbsp;13 years, 72% were men. During a median follow-up period of 14 days, 81 patients (24%) died. In the Cox regression analysis, patients with elevated both NPs and troponin levels had higher risk of death compared with those with normal levels of both (hazard ratio 2.94; 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 6.64; p = 0.009), and this remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, oxygen saturation, HF history, and chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, NPs provided risk stratification also in patients with normal troponin values (hazard ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 6.72; p = 0.016 with high NPs levels). These data show the combined prognostic role of troponin and NPs in COVID-19 patients. NPs value may be helpful in identifying patients with a worse prognosis among those with normal troponin values. Further, NPs' cut-point used for diagnosis of acute HF has a predictive role in patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The role of sex compared to comorbidities and other prognostic variables in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is unclear. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study on patients with COVID-19 infection, referred to 13 cardiology units. The primary objective was to assess the difference in risk of death between the sexes. The secondary objective was to explore sex-based heterogeneity in the association between demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, and patients' risk of death. RESULTS: Seven hundred and one patients were included: 214 (30.5%) women and 487 (69.5%) men. During a median follow-up of 15 days, deaths occurred in 39 (18.2%) women and 126 (25.9%) men. In a multivariable Cox regression model, men had a nonsignificantly higher risk of death vs. women (P = 0.07).The risk of death was more than double in men with a low lymphocytes count as compared with men with a high lymphocytes count [overall survival hazard ratio (OS-HR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-3.81]. In contrast, lymphocytes count was not related to death in women (P = 0.03).Platelets count was associated with better outcome in men (OS-HR for increase of 50 × 103 units: 0.88 95% CI 0.78-1.00) but not in women. The strength of association between higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lower risk of death was larger in women (OS-HR for increase of 50 mmHg/%: 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89) vs. men (OS-HR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' sex is a relevant variable that should be taken into account when evaluating risk of death from COVID-19. There is a sex-based heterogeneity in the association between baseline variables and patients' risk of death.

A 65-year-old female was admitted to our hospital for sudden onset of typical chest pain at rest lasting few minutes. Her medical background included systemic hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and mild obesity. Upon arrival in the emergency room, the electrocardiogram didn’t reveal signs of acute myocardial ischaemia and serial cardiac troponin T measurements were persistently negative. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed, showing mild ventricular hypertrophy, no regional wall motion abnormalities, and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. A highly echogenic tubular structure, located slightly on the atrial side of the atrioventricular groove was noted in multiple apical views. Its tubular shape was suggestive of a vascular structure, but its location was atypical for a normal vessel; indeed its persistence in more than an echocardiographic plane excluded an artefact. According to patient’s clinical history and her high cardiovascular risk profile she was referred for coronary angiography, demonstrating no critical stenosis but an anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) from the inappropriate sinus of Valsalva: the left main coronary artery (LMCA) arose from the right coronary cusp and then took a caudal posterior loop running posterior to the aortic root. In light of these findings we could associate the tubular structure seen at TTE to the retroaortic course of LMCA, a finding recently described as retroaortic anomalous coronary (RAC) sign. Among AAOCA, the retroaortic course of the LMCA is an uncommon diagnosis in adults, and its association with a single coronary origin is extremely rare. Although it has been usually considered a benign clinical entity, it is associated with an increased risk in morbidity and mortality during valve surgery. The presence of RAC sign at TTE was demonstrated to be highly suggestive of an anomalous coronary artery (specificity 93.9%) and strongly associated with retroaortic LMCA course at computed tomography angiography. 234 Figure B

Aims The sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have been demonstrated to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data are available characterizing the generalizability of SGLT2 inhibitors treatment in the clinical practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the proportion of outpatients with HFrEF that would be eligible for SGLT2 inhibitors in a contemporary real-world population. Methods and results We retrospectively evaluated patients with chronic stable HFrEF followed-up at the HF outpatient clinic of our institution. Patients’ eligibility was assessed according to the entry criteria of DAPA-HF (dapagliflozin) and EMPEROR-Reduced (empagliflozin) trials and to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label criteria (only dapagliflozin). A total of 441 HFrEF patients was enrolled. According to the major inclusion and exclusion criteria from DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, 198 (45%) patients would be candidates for initiation of both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 61 (14%) would be eligible only to dapagliflozin and 23 (5%) only to empagliflozin, without significant differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (P = 0.23). Among patients not suitable for gliflozins treatment (159 patients; 36%), the major determinant of ineligibility was the failure to achieve the predefined NT-proBNP inclusion threshold. Excluding NTproBNP as per FDA label criteria, dapagliflozin eligibility increased to 86%. Conclusions In our real-world analysis a large proportion of HFrEF patients would be candidates for initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, supporting its broad generalizability in clinical practice. This would be expected to reduce morbidity and mortality in eligible patients.

Aims Several risk factors have been identified to predict worse outcomes in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prediction models are needed to optimize clinical management and to early stratify patients at a higher mortality risk. Machine learning (ML) algorithms represent a novel approach to identify a prediction model with a good discriminatory capacity to be easily used in clinical practice. Methods and results The Cardio-COVID is a multicentre observational study that involved a cohort of consecutive adult Caucasian patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 [by real time reverse transcriptase—polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)] who were hospitalized in 13 Italian cardiology units from 1 March to 9 April 2020. Patients were followed-up after the COVID-19 diagnosis and all causes in-hospital mortality or discharge were ascertained until 23 April 2020. Variables with more than 20% of missing values were excluded. The Lasso procedure was used with a λ = 0.07 for reducing the covariates number. Mortality was estimated by means of a Random Forest (RF). The dataset was randomly divided in two subsamples with the same percentage of death/alive people of the entire sample: training set contained 80% of the data and test set the remaining 20%. The training set was used in the calibration procedure where a RF models in-hospital mortality with the covariates selected by Lasso. Its accuracy was measured by means of the ROC curve, obtaining AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and related 95% confidence interval (CI) computed with 10 000 stratified bootstrap replicates. From the RF the relative Variable Importance Measure (relVIM) was extracted to understand which of the selected variables had the greatest impact on outcome, providing a ranking from the most (relVIM = 100) to the less important variable. The model obtained was compared with the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and with the logistic regression, where the predictions were cross validated. Finally, to understand if each model has the same performance in sample (training) and out of sample (test), the two AUCs were compared by means of the DeLong’s test. Among 701 patients enrolled (mean age 67.2 ± 13.2 years, 69.5% males), 165 (23.5%) died during a median hospitalization of 15 (IQR, 9–24) days. Variables selected by the Lasso were: age, Oxygen saturation, PaO2/FiO2, Creatinine Clearance and elevated Troponin. Compared with those who survived, deceased patients were older, had a lower blood oxygenation, a lower creatinine clearance levels and higher prevalence of elevated Troponin (all P Conclusions In a large COVID-19 population, we showed that a customizable ML-based score derived from clinical variables, is feasible and effective for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Aims Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%] despite ≥3 months of optimal medical therapy. Recent observations demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse cardiac remodelling in eligible HFrEF patients. Given the pivotal role of LVEF in the selection of ICD candidates, we sought to assess the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on ICD eligibility and its predictors in HFrEF patients. Methods and results We retrospectively evaluated 48 chronic HFrEF patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan and previously implanted with an ICD in primary prevention. We assumed that ICD was no longer necessary if LVEF improved >35% (or > 30% in asymptomatics) at follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, sacubitril/valsartan induced a significant drop in LV end-systolic volume (−16.7 ml/m2, P = 0.023) and diameter (−6.8 mm, P = 0.022), resulting in a significant increase in LVEF (+3.9%, P Conclusions In symptomatic HFrEF patients, sacubitril/valsartan induced beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and improved NYHA class. These effects resulted in a significant reduction of patients deemed eligible for ICD in primary prevention.

Background Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) is defined as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥80 mmHg and systolic blood pressure (SBP) 80 mmHg); isolated systolic hypertension (ISH: SBP ≥130/DBP

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been previously considered “soft” end-points because of the lack of association of the reported outcome to measurable biological parameters. The present study aimed to assess whether electrocardiographic measures are associated to PROs changes. We evaluated the association between heart rate (HR), QRS and QT/QTc durations and PROs, classified as “good” or “bad” according to the patients’ overall feeling of health, in patients from the Chiron project. Twenty-four chronic heart failure (HF) patients were enrolled in the study (71% male, mean age 62.9 ± 9.4 years, 42% ischemic etiology, 15 NYHA class II and 9 class III) providing 1086 days of usable physiological recordings (4 hours/day). The mean HR was significantly higher in the “bad” than in the “good” PROs class (74.0 ± 6.4 bpm vs 68.0 ± 7.2 bpm; p

Background The sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have been demonstrated to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data are available characterizing the generalizability of SGLT2 inhibitors treatment in the clinical practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the proportion of outpatients with HFrEF that would be eligible for SGLT2 inhibitors in a contemporary real-world population. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients with chronic stable HFrEF followed-up at the HF outpatient clinic of our institution. Patients' eligibility was assessed according to the entry criteria of DAPA-HF (dapagliflozin) and EMPEROR-Reduced (empagliflozin) trials and to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label criteria (only dapagliflozin). Results A total of 441 HFrEF patients was enrolled. According to the major inclusion and exclusion criteria from DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, 198 (45%) patients would be candidates for initiation of both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 61 (14%) would be eligible only to dapagliflozin and 23 (5%) only to empagliflozin, without significant differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (p = 0.23). Among patients not suitable for gliflozins treatment (159 patients; 36%), the major determinant of ineligibility was the failure to achieve the predefined NT-proBNP inclusion threshold. Excluding NTproBNP as per FDA label criteria, dapagliflozin eligibility increased to 86%. Conclusions In our real-world analysis a large proportion of HFrEF patients would be candidates for initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, supporting its broad generalizability in clinical practice. This would be expected to reduce morbidity and mortality in eligible patients.

Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been described in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) critically ill patients, but the evidence from more heterogeneous cohorts is limited. Methods Data were retrospectively obtained from consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 13 Cardiology Units in Italy, from March 1st to April 9th, 2020, and followed until in-hospital death, discharge, or April 23rd, 2020. The association of baseline variables with computed tomography-confirmed PE was investigated by Cox hazards regression analysis. The relationship between d-dimer levels and PE incidence was evaluated using restricted cubic splines models. Results The study included 689 patients (67.3 ± 13.2 year-old, 69.4% males), of whom 43.6% were non-invasively ventilated and 15.8% invasively. 52 (7.5%) had PE over 15 (9–24) days of follow-up. Compared with those without PE, these subjects had younger age, higher BMI, less often heart failure and chronic kidney disease, more severe cardio-pulmonary involvement, and higher admission d-dimer [4344 (1099–15,118) vs. 818.5 (417–1460) ng/mL, p p p = 0.06). In multivariate regression, only d-dimer was associated with PE (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.13–2.62; p = 0.01). The relation between d-dimer concentrations and PE incidence was linear, without inflection point. Only two subjects had a baseline d-dimer Conclusions PE occurs in a sizable proportion of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The implications of bleeding events and the role of d-dimer in this population need to be clarified. Graphic abstract

Aims Myocardial injury (MI) in coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is quite prevalent at admission and affects prognosis. Little is known about troponin trajectories and their prognostic role. We aimed to describe the early in‐hospital evolution of MI and its prognostic impact. Methods and results We performed an analysis from an Italian multicentre study enrolling COVID‐19 patients, hospitalized from 1 March to 9 April 2020. MI was defined as increased troponin level. The first troponin was tested within 24 h from admission, the second one between 24 and 48 h. Elevated troponin was defined as values above the 99th percentile of normal values. Patients were divided in four groups: normal, normal then elevated, elevated then normal, and elevated. The outcome was in‐hospital death. The study population included 197 patients; 41% had normal troponin at both evaluations, 44% had elevated troponin at both assessments, 8% had normal then elevated troponin, and 7% had elevated then normal troponin. During hospitalization, 49 (25%) patients died. Patients with incident MI, with persistent MI, and with MI only at admission had a higher risk of death compared with those with normal troponin at both evaluations (P

Aims To assess the clinical relevance of a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods and results We enrolled 696 consecutive patients (mean age 67.4 ± 13.2 years, 69.7% males) admitted for COVID-19 in 13 Italian cardiology centres between 1 March and 9 April 2020. One hundred and six patients (15%) had a history of AF and the median hospitalization length was 14 days (interquartile range 9–24). Patients with a history of AF were older and with a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Compared to patients without AF, they showed a higher rate of in-hospital death (38.7% vs. 20.8%; P 0.05 for both) and was not related to stroke or bleeding events. Conclusion Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, a history of AF contributes to worse clinical course with a higher mortality and in-hospital events including new-onset AF, acute HF, and multiorgan failure. The mortality risk remains significant after adjustment for variables associated with COVID-19 severity and comorbidities.

Phosphodiesterase-5A inhibitors (PDE5i) are sometimes used in patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction before heart transplant or left ventricular assist device implantation to decrease right ventricular (RV) afterload and mitigate the risk of right heart failure. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the impact of these drugs on RV contractility. The aim of this study was to explore the acute effects of PDE5i on ventricular-vascular coupling and load-independent RV contractility.Twenty-two patients underwent right heart catheterization and gated equilibrium blood pool single photon emission computed tomography, before and after 20 mg intravenous sildenafil. Single photon emission computed tomography and right heart catheterization-derived data were used to calculate RV loading and contractility.PDE5i induced a decrease in the right atrial pressure (-43%), pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure (-26%), and PA wedge pressure (PAWP; -23%), with favorable reductions in pulmonary vascular resistance (-41%) and PA elastance (-40%), and increased cardiac output (+13%) (all P0.01). The RV ejection fraction increased with sildenafil (+20%), with no change of RV contractility (P = 0.74), indicating that the improvement in the RV ejection fraction was related to enhanced RV-PA coupling (r = 0.59, P = 0.004) by a decrease in the ventricular load. RV diastolic compliance increased with sildenafil. The decrease in the PAWP correlated with RV end-diastolic volume decrease; no relationship was observed with the change in LV transmural pressure, suggesting decreased pericardial constraint.Acute PDE5i administration has profound RV afterload-reducing effects, improves the RVEF, decreases RV volumes, and decreases the PAWP, predominantly through relief of pericardial constraint, without effects on RV chamber contractility. These findings support further study of PDE5i in protection of RV function in advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are at risk of RV failure.

Double-chambered left ventricle (DCLV) is a rare congenital abnormality and is characterized by the subdivision of the left ventricle into two separate chambers by an abnormal septum or muscle band. This rare congenital entity is usually diagnosed in the neonatal or pediatric age. Nevertheless, it can be asymptomatic and incidentally found in the adulthood. A comprehensive multimodality imaging approach is crucial for the correct final diagnosis.

Introduction: In advanced HFpEF, acute phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibition leads to favorable change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and to an increased cardiac output (CO) of variable degree. The determinants of the response are poorely understood. Methods: 47 HFrEF patients (85% males, 57±11 years, NYHA 2.9±0.5, 55% non-ischemic, PAmean 42±8 mmHg, 43% RV dysfunction) underwent clinical exam, echocardiography, biochemical tests and right heart catheterization (RHC) before and after I.V. administration of sildenafil (20 mg). Baseline predictors of absolute and relative (%diff) change of PVR and CO were studied. Results: PDE5i led to highly significant (p Conclusions: The largest increase in CO after PDE5i is observed in HFrEF patients with severe mitral (or tricuspid) regurgitation, probably due to chamber unloading and reduction of regurgitant SV. Pulmonary vasodilator response to PDE5i may be influenced by plasma potassium level. High-normal plasma potassium levels may preserve normal pulmonary vasoreactivity in HFrEF, perhaps by influencing K-channels in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells.

Background ICD implantation is recommended for primary prevention in patients with symptomatic NYHA II-III heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (< 35%) (HFrEF) and without left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement despite at least three months of guideline-directed therapy. The use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696 has shown to ameliorate left ventricle function and to reduce the ventricular arrhythmias burden in patients with HFrEF. Purpose The profile of patients with HFrEF who may benefit from therapy with LCZ696 without further requiring an ICD in primary prevention is still unknown. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these patients and to find potential clinical predictors of responsiveness to this treatment. Methods We enrolled consecutive patients that started LCZ696 treatment for medical therapy optimization in the heart failure clinic of our institution. All of them were previously implanted with an ICD before LCZ696 availability (from 2009 to 2015). A cardiologist evaluated their home medications, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics both at baseline (before starting LCZ696) and during follow up. The patients were grouped also according to the etiology of HF (ischemic/non-ischemic) and by gender. Patients were excluded if candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Responsiveness to LCZ696 treatment was defined as an increase of LVEF to values > 35% at follow up (FU). Results A total of 49 patients (67.1 ± 9.8 years of age) were enrolled in this study and followed in the heart failure clinic of our institution (mean follow up 11.5 ± 4.9 months). Among them, 19 patients (38%) showed an increase in LVEF to values > 35% at follow up and a significant improvement in LVEF was appreciated (baseline LVEF: 31.2 ± 4.5 vs. follow up LVEF: 35.4 ± 8.0; p 0.003). No significant differences were recorded at baseline in LVEF within HF etiology and gender groups. At follow up, we found a significant increase in post-therapy LVEF only in the non-ischemic etiology group (from 31.5 ± 4.4 to 37.1 ± 8.1, p = 0.001) and in the male group (from 31.4 ± 4.5 to 34.9 ± 7.9, p = 0.005) in comparison with the ischemic etiology and the female group, respectively. No significant statistical differences were appreciated between responders and non-responders neither in terms of home medications nor in the LCZ696 doses, both at baseline and follow up. Conclusion This study suggests a potential impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition therapy in the selection of patients with HFrEF candidates to ICD in primary prevention. In this real-world experience from our HF clinic, we found a significant LVEF improvement in approximately 40% of patients treated with LCZ696. These patients, in FU evaluation, would not have needed for an ICD implantation. This benefit appears related to the non-ischemic etiology of HF and the male gender. Abstract Figure. LVEF VARIATIONS

BACKGROUND Visit-to-visit office blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has been associated with morbidity and mortality outcomes in several cardiovascular conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between BPV and outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and the effect of eplerenone on BPV. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated the associations between BPV, calculated as SBP coefficient of variation (SBP-CoV = SD/mean × 100%), and the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and its components, in 2549 patients from the Eplerenone in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Mild Symptoms trial. Lower SBP-CoV was independently associated with a higher risk of all the studied outcomes, while higher as well as lower SBP-CoV were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death. After a median follow-up period of 21 months the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HFH was almost double in the lower SBP-CoV tertile as compared with the intermediate tertile [adjusted hazard ratio: 2.01, 95% confidence interval (1.62-2.51), P

Aims: To assess the clinical value of measuring right atrial pressure (RAP) using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and results: RAP was measured non-invasively using NIRS over the external jugular vein (Venus 1000, Mespere LifeSciences, Canada) in ambulatory patients with CHF enrolled in the Studies Investigating Co-morbidities Aggravating Heart Failure (SICA-HF) programme. Comparing 243 patients with CHF (mean age 71 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 45%, median NT-proBNP 788 ng/L) to 49 controls (NT-proBNP ≤125 ng/L), RAP was 7 [interquartile range (IQR) 4–11] mmHg vs. 4 (IQR 3–8) mmHg (P < 0.001). Those with RAP ≥10 mmHg (n = 75) were older, had more severe clinical congestion and renal dysfunction, higher plasma NT-proBNP, larger left atrial volume, higher systolic pulmonary pressure and were more often in atrial fibrillation but their LVEF was similar to patients with lower RAP. During a median follow-up of 595 (IQR: 492–714) days, 49 patients (20%) died or were hospitalized for worsening CHF. Compared with patients with RAP ≤5 mmHg, those with RAP ≥10 mmHg had a greater risk of an event (hazard ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1.19–4.75, P = 0.014). RAP measured by NIRS predicted outcome, competing with NT-proBNP in multivariable models. Conclusions: Measuring RAP using NIRS identifies ambulatory patients with CHF who have more severe congestion and a worse outcome. The device might be a useful objective method of monitoring RAP, especially for those inexperienced in eliciting physical signs or when measurement of natriuretic peptides is not immediately available.

Importance: Myocardial injury, detected by elevated plasma troponin levels, has been associated with mortality in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the initial data were reported from single-center or 2-center studies in Chinese populations. Compared with these patients, European and US patients are older, with more comorbidities and higher mortality rates. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic value of myocardial injury, detected by elevated plasma troponin levels, in a large population of White Italian patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolling consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized in 13 Italian cardiology units from March 1 to April 9, 2020. Patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome were excluded. Elevated troponin levels were defined as values greater than the 99th percentile of normal values. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical characteristics and outcomes stratified as elevated or normal cardiac troponin levels at admission, defined as troponin T or troponin I at a level greater than the 99th percentile of normal values. Results: A total of 614 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study (mean age [SD], 67 [13] years; 70.8% male), of whom 148 patients (24.1%) died during the hospitalization. Elevated troponin levels were found in 278 patients (45.3%). These patients were older (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [13.6] years vs 71.3 [12.0] years; P

Aims: To assess the prognostic value of a history of heart failure (HF) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods and results: We enrolled 692 consecutive patients admitted for COVID-19 in 13 Italian cardiology centres between 1 March and 9 April 2020. Mean age was 67.4± 13.2 years, 69.5% of patients were males, 90 (13.0%) had a history of HF, median hospitalization length was 14 days (interquartile range 9–24). In-hospital death occurred in 37 of 90 patients (41.1%) with HF history vs. 126 of those with no HF history (20.9%). The increased risk of death associated with HF history remained significant after adjustment for clinical variables related to COVID-19 and HF severity, including comorbidities, oxygen saturation, lymphocyte count and plasma troponin [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death: 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26–4.02; P= 0.006 at multivariable Cox regression model including 404 patients]. Patients with a history of HF also had more in-hospital complications including. acute HF (33.3% vs. 5.1%, P< 0.001), acute renal failure (28.1% vs. 12.9%, P< 0.001), multiorgan failure (15.9% vs. 5.8%, P= 0.004) and sepsis (18.4% vs. 8.9%, P= 0.006). Other independent predictors of outcome were age, sex, oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure at arterial gas analysis/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2). In-hospital treatment with corticosteroids and heparin had beneficial effects (adjusted HR for death: 0.46; 95% CI 0.29–0.74; P= 0.001; n= 404 for corticosteroids, and adjusted HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.25–0.67; P< 0.001; n= 364 for heparin). Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and a history of HF have an extremely poor outcome with higher mortality and in-hospital complications. HF history is an independent predictor of increased in-hospital mortality.

Background Cachexia worsens long‐term prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). Effective treatment of cachexia is missing. We seek to characterize mechanisms of cachexia in adipose tissue, which could serve as novel targets for the treatment. Methods The study was conducted in advanced HF patients (n = 52; 83% male patients) undergoing heart transplantation. Patients with ≥7.5% non‐intentional body weight (BW) loss during the last 6 months were rated cachectic. Clinical characteristics and circulating markers were compared between cachectic (n = 17) and the remaining, BW‐stable patients. In epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), expression of selected genes was evaluated, and a combined metabolomic/lipidomic analysis was performed to assess (i) the role of adipose tissue metabolism in the development of cachexia and (ii) potential impact of cachexia‐associated changes on EAT‐myocardium environment. Results Cachectic vs. BW‐stable patients had higher plasma levels of natriuretic peptide B (BNP; 2007 ± 1229 vs. 1411 ± 1272 pg/mL; P = 0.010) and lower EAT thickness (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.4 mm; P = 0.010), and they were treated with ~2.5‐fold lower dose of both β‐blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACE/ARB‐inhibitors). The overall pattern of EAT gene expression suggested simultaneous activation of lipolysis and lipogenesis in cachexia. Lower ratio between expression levels of natriuretic peptide receptors C and A was observed in cachectic vs. BW‐stable patients (0.47 vs. 1.30), supporting activation of EAT lipolysis by natriuretic peptides. Fundamental differences in metabolome/lipidome between BW‐stable and cachectic patients were found. Mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin (CL), specifically the least abundant CL 70:6 species (containing C16:1, C18:1, and C18:2 acyls), was the most discriminating analyte (partial least squares discriminant analysis; variable importance in projection score = 4). Its EAT levels were higher in cachectic as compared with BW‐stable patients and correlated with the degree of BW loss during the last 6 months (r = −0.94; P = 0.036). Conclusions Our results suggest that (i) BNP signalling contributes to changes in EAT metabolism in cardiac cachexia and (ii) maintenance of stable BW and ‘healthy’ EAT‐myocardium microenvironment depends on the ability to tolerate higher doses of both ACE/ARB inhibitors and β‐adrenergic blockers. In line with preclinical studies, we show for the first time in humans the association of cachexia with increased adipose tissue levels of CL. Specifically, CL 70:6 could precipitate wasting of adipose tissue, and thus, it could represent a therapeutic target to ameliorate cachexia.

Upregulation of ketone body (β-hydroxybutyrate, βHB) utilization has been documented in human end-stage heart failure (HF), but is unclear if this is due to intrinsic cardiac metabolic remodeling or a HF-related catabolic state. This study sought to evaluate the maximal ketone body utilization capacity and its determinants in controls and in patients with moderate HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).19 HFrEF patients and 9 controls underwent sampling from the arterial circulation (A) and coronary sinus (CS) to measure transmyocardial extraction of energy-providing substrates and oxygen. In a separate experiment, measurements were performed 80-min after oral administration of 25 g of ketone ester (KE, (R)-3-hydroxybutyl(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate) drink in 11 HFrEF and 6 control subjects. There were no statistically significant differences in fasting substrate levels and fractional extractions between HF and controls. Administration of KE increased βHB by 12.9-fold, revealing an increased ability to utilize ketones in HFrEF as compared to controls (fractional extraction, FE%: 52 vs 39%, p = 0.035). βHB FE% correlated directly with βHB myocardial delivery (r = 0.90), LV mass (r = 0.56), LV diameter (r = 0.65) and inversely with LV EF (-0.59) (all p 0.05). βHB FE% positively correlated with lactate FE% (p 0.01), but not with FFA or glucose FE%, arguing against substrate competition.Acute nutritional ketosis enhances βHB extraction in patients with HFrEF compared to controls, and this enhancement correlates with degree of cardiac dysfunction and remodeling. Data suggest that subclinical metabolic remodeling occurs early in HF progression. Further studies are needed to determine whether exogenous ketones may have a potential therapeutic role.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between gait speed and the risk for death and/or hospital admission in older patients with heart failure (HF). Background Gait speed is a reliable single marker of frailty in older people and can predict falls, disability, hospital admissions, and mortality. Methods In total, 331 community-living patients ≥70 years of age (mean age 78 ± 6 years, 43% women, mean ejection fraction 35 ± 11%, mean New York Heart Association functional class 2.7 ± 0.6) in stable condition and receiving optimized therapy for chronic HF were prospectively enrolled and followed for 1 year. Gait speed was measured at the usual pace over 4 m, and cutoffs were defined by tertiles: ≤0.65, 0.66 to 0.99, and ≥1.0 m/s. Results There was a significant association between gait speed tertiles and 1-year mortality: 38.3%, 21.9%, and 9.1% (p Conclusions Gait speed is independently associated with death, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause hospitalization and improves risk stratification in older patients with HF evaluated using the Cardiac and Comorbid Conditions Heart Failure score. Assessment of frailty using gait speed is simple and should be part of the clinical evaluation process.