Search

Background: In patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) counts have a strong prognostic impact on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Changes 4 weeks after the start of a new line of therapy, inform on treatment efficacy. Despite improvements in systemic treatment, metastatic BC remains mainly uncurable with alteration of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the course of the disease. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors and biological factors as CTC on HRQOL. Methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative patients receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab according to EMA approved combination. The aim of this cohort was to evaluate clinical, biological and radiological parameters associated with patients’ outcome (CTC, CEC, serum markers, ctDNA, pharmacogenomic polymorphisms, metabolomic parameters, visceral fat assessed by initial CTscan, serum estradiol level, and quality of life). HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its breast cancer specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Five dimensions of HRQOL were analyzed for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL was defined as the interval between inclusion and the first decrease in HRQOL score ≥ 5 compared to baseline HRQOL score with no further improvement or in case of death. CTC counts were determined using the standard CellSearch system [Menarini Silicon Biosystems]. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. CTC counts were available in 261 patients at base line and in 229 patients after 4 weeks of treatment, before second cycle of chemotherapy. CTC high count was independent of main clinical and biological characteristics except lobular subtype. We confirmed the poor outcome of patients with high CTC count at base line and after one cycle of treatment with the threshold of > 4CTC/7.5 ml of blood. Out of the 5 dimensions of HRQOL, TUDD of EF was significantly correlated with a high CTC level at base line (p=0.0262) and even more with still an elevated count of CTC after one cycle of chemotherapy(p=0.0137). There was no association of CTC with the other dimensions of HRQOL. Conclusion: This is the first study ever reporting an analysis of QoL and CTC. We observed an association of high CTC count with one component of HRQOL scale. This suggests that CTC could be complementary to clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy. Citation Format: Jean-Yves Pierga, Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Jérôme Lemonnier, Frédérique Berger, Olivier Trédan, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Franck Bonnetain, Francois-Clement Bidard, Shufang Renault. Circulating tumor cells enumeration and Health Related Quality of Life of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-24.

Background: Advances in screening and treatment have led to increase in breast cancer (BC) survival in recent years but prognoses for metastatic BC remain poor with poorer outcomes as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Treatment as bevacizumab and paclitaxel for metastatic BC, although that can increase time to progression of disease, often carry toxicity and is not curative but rather palliative in intent with the goal to improve or maintain HRQOL. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors such as disease progression, toxicity on HRQOL. Methods: COMET study is a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study in France whose main objective was to identify biological factor that could predict the clinical benefit of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first treatment in HER2 negative metastatic BC. HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle (every for 4 weeks) until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its BC specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. In this ancillary study, we targeted 5 dimensions HRQOL for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). The primary endpoint was time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL scales that defined as time between inclusion and the first decrease HRQOL score ≥ 5 points compared to baseline score, with no further improvement of at least 5 points. Multivariable Cox model with time dependent covariate was performed to assess clinical factors associated with TUDD for each of the 5 target dimensions HRQOL. We performed 3 models for each dimension: model 1 including all covariate with p< 0.10 in univariable; model 2 including model 1 and adjusted on cancer subtype and model 3 included model 1 stratified by cancer subtype. P value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. Median age at inclusion was 58 years (range: 29-83), and 24.4% of patients had triple negative tumor subtype. About 79 % of cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma and 43 % patients had least 3 metastasis sites at baseline. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. In multivariable analyses, Disease Progression was associated with TUDD of GHS (HR [99%CI] =2.4 [1.2-4.9] and TUDD of PF (2.1 [1.1-3.7]). After adjusted on cancer subtype, association persisted with TUDD of GHS (p=0.009). Performance Status was associated with TUDD of PF (1.6 [1.2-2.3]), and TUDD of Pain (1.6 [1.1-2.3]). Performance Status association with TUDD of PF continued after adjustment on cancer subtype (p=0.0003). Prior endocrine therapy was associated with TUDD of pain in patients with tumor with positive hormone receptor (HR+) (2.4 [1.2-4.7]). There was no factor associated with TUDD of EF and TUDD of FA. Conclusion: Results of this study have shown that among the 5 targeted dimensions HRQOL, Physical Functioning was deteriorated in the shortest time. Disease progression, base line performance status and prior endocrine therapy for HR+ subtype, are clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy. Citation Format: Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Marion Chevrier, Franck Bonnetain, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Olivier Trédan, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Mireille Mousseau, Julien Grenier, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Frédérique Berger, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-54.

Background Obesity has previously been correlated with poorer survival in both early and metastatic breast cancer. Adipose tissues release proangiogenic factors such as Insulin-like Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor that may ultimately promote tumor growth. CTscan can be used to measure the visceral fat area (VFA) and the subcutaneous fat area (SFA) on the same section. High VFA has been shown to independently predict poorer outcome in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The prospective multicenter COMET trial included metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as fist-line chemotherapy. This study was designed to identify and validate reliable factors to predict benefit of bevacizumab and allow for a more personalized use of this antiangiogenic agent. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of BMI (Body Mass Index), VFA and SFA in the COMET cohort and their impact on the quality of life. Patients and Methods Out of the 510 patients included in the COMET trial from 9/2012 to 3/2016, 480 received bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment and 360 had available CTscan data. VFA and SFA were measured retrospectively on the CTscans performed before chemotherapy initiation, at the level of the umbilicus with the patient in the supine position. ImageJ software was used to measure pixels with densities in the -190 HU to -30 HU range in order to delineate the subcutaneous and visceral compartments and to compute the cross-sectional area of each in cm2. These measurements were performed by a radiologist blinded to patients’ characteristics and outcomes. For VFA and SFA, we used a threshold at the median value. VFA and SFA levels were tested for their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact on quality of life was based on the Global Health Status, the Physical functioning, the Emotional functioning, Fatigue and Pain scores. Results The mean age at inclusion was 57 years (range: 28-83). At initial diagnosis, the main histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 247, 80.7%). Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 245, 68.1%) and a large majority (95.4%) had less than 3 metastatic sites. One hundred and forty patients (46.7%) had histological grade II and 41% had grade III tumors. The majority of the patients had positive hormone receptor tumor (n = 238, 79.3 %) and 62 (20.7%) had triple-negative tumor subtype. The median BMI was 24.7 (range : 17-46). After a median follow-up of 60.6 months (95%CI, 60-61.3), median PFS was 9.5 months (95CI, 8.6-10.3). There was no significant correlation between BMI (p = 0.69), VFA (p = 0.24) or SFA (p = 0.58) and PFS in the univariate analysis. The median OS was 29.6 months (95CI, 25.9-32.4). BMI, VFA and SFA were not correlated with OS. Out of the 360 patients, 328 had available data regarding the quality of life. There was no impact of the VFA or the SFA on the different quality of life scores. Conclusions In our prospective cohort of 360 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment, high VFA or high SFA were not associated with a poorer survival. VFA and SFA had no impact on quality of life. Citation Format: Séverine Guiu, Boris Guiu, Marion Chevrier, Oumar Billa, Christelle Levy, Olivier Trédan, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marc Debled, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Jouannaud, Anthony Gonçalves, Maria Rios, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Frédérique Berger, Fatima-Zohra TOUMI, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Sophie Gourgou. Visceral fat area as a predictive factor in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-04.

The impact of the histological lobular subtype on overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still under debate, with very few data available.Using the French national multicentre Epidemiological Strategy and Medico Economics [ESME]) data platform, the primary objective was to compare the OS of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) versus invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) MBC, with adjustment on the main prognostic factors using two approaches: multivariable analysis and matching with a propensity score. Secondary objectives were to compare first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) and describe patients and tumour characteristics.Of the 16,703 patients with MBC in the ESME database, 13,111 met all inclusion criteria for the present analysis. One-thousand eight-hundred and four (13.8%) patients had ILC and 11.307 (86.2%) IDC. In the multivariable analysis, patients with ILC had a worse OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.31; 95%CI 1.20-1.42; p 0.0001] and a worse PFS1 (HR: 1.15; 95%CI 1.07-1.22; p 0.0001) as compared with those with IDC, independently of hormone receptor and HER2 status. Interestingly, OS was better (HR 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.98; p = 0.0302), worse (HR: 1.17; 95%CI 1.08-1.27; p = 0.0001) or similar (HR: 0.88; 95%CI 0.67-1.15; p = 0.3455) in patients with ILC with triple-negative, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive MBC, respectively, compared with patients with IDC.Lobular histology is an independent adverse prognostic factor among women with MBC. ILC MBC could be considered a specific entity. Dedicated prospective studies are needed to tailor the management of these patients.

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is proposed for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to increase the breast conservative treatment (BCT). In France, mastectomy is the risk-reducing prophylactic surgical strategy only for pre-symptomatic germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) patients. On the other hand, BCT is proposed to all patients following NAC based on clinical response, even for patients do not demonstrating germline BRCA mutation. Moreover, in the case of BRCA mutation, local recurrence risk is higher in the BCT group (23%) vs mastectomy (5%). The aim of this retrospective one-institution analysis is to evaluate if the knowledge of gBRCAm status impact shared surgical decision between surgeons and patients. Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated for unilateral LABC, T2-4, N≥0, M0 by NAC, and (ii) patients who underwent germline BRCA screening. BRCA screening, using targeted next-generation screening, was carried out either during NAC (rapid process) or after surgery. Deleterious mutations were confirmed using Sanger sequencing before passing on the results to the clinical geneticist. Some gBRCAm patients from Olympia clinical trial study were also included. Patients were followed-up over a long term for overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and disease-free recurrence interval (DRFI). Chi-square, Fischer test and T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to generate statistical descriptive analysis. Results: Between 2007 and 2015, 988 women were treated for LABC at our institution. Among them, 151 patients underwent clinical genetic testing for gBRCAm based on these criteria: young age at diagnosis or familial history of breast or ovarian cancer or histological characteristics as grade 2/3, Her2-3+ or basal like. A total of 125 patients were included in the study; 27 patients had germline mutations (MT group) and no mutations were detected in 98 patients (WT). Significant differences between the two groups (MT vs WT) were observed for - Intrinsic tumor subtypes basal like (64.3% vs 42.5%, p=0.0432) - ER are more often negative (21.4% vs 46.8%, p=0.0165). Among the 29 patients who underwent germline screening during NAC and eligible for BCT, all the patients with gBRCAm choose mastectomy (100%). Among the 96 patients with screening mutation after breast cancer treatment, 6 of the 19 patients with gBRCAm had a mastectomy (28%). In the 25 gBRCAm patients, 15 had a BCT and 11 a mastectomy. In the 98 wtBRCA patients, 70 had a BCT and 28 a mastectomy. After a follow-up of 76.8 months of 83 patients with BCT, we observed 9 LR, 7% in the WT group and 30.8% in the MT group. The median delay of disease recurrence is 40.8 months [22-113]. According DRFI and OS, there is not statistically difference between the WT and the MT group, at 3 years and 5 years of follow up. Discussion: In this selected subgroup of patients, gBRCAm rate is higher (21%) than the rate based on familial criteria for BRCA testing (12%). Regarding the rationale for BCT or mastectomy procedure in LABC and pre-symptomatic gBRCAm patients, this study led us to establish mastectomy as the sole risk-reducing strategy surgery procedure for gBRCAm patients. Moreover, 100% gBRCAm patients chose mastectomy; the mastectomy rate was lower when the patient was unaware of their BRCA status (26%). The LR rate was higher in the gBRCAm vs wtBRCA with a statistical difference. In LABC patients with high genetic risk, the knowledge of mutation status could influence patients’ and surgeons’ choice of surgery. In case of gBRCAm status, mastectomy is recommended to decrease LR risk Citation Format: Nicolas Sevenet, Christine Tunon de Lara, Jeanne Leroux, Françoise Bonnet, Marc Debled, Delfine Lafon, Emmanuelle Barouk-Simonet, Marion Fournier, Adeline Petit, Virginie Bubien, Nathalie Quenel-Tueux, Véronique Brouste, Gaëtan MacGrogan. Germline BRCA screening for locally advanced breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Defining a subgroup with high rate of mutation and local relapses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-10.

Background The everolimus (EVE)-exemestane combination has been included in the International guidelines for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer (mBC) since the results of the Bolero-2 trial. Marketing authorization has been granted in France in July 2012. A first report of the UNICANCER Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Research program described the real world use of everolimus therapy (ESMO 2017, #266). We report here updated data with long-term overall survival (OS) analyses, focusing on patients treated from 2012 onwards. Methods All patients (pts) who initiated treatment for a newly diagnosed mBC between 2008 and 2017 in all 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers have been included in the real life ESME database, which collects retrospective data using a clinical trial-like methodology. The primary endpoint of the present report was overall survival in pts who received everolimus. In order to adjust for differences between groups (EVE treated vs non EVE treated patients), we analyzed the impact of everolimus on OS and PFS by using a propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) sensitivity analyses, built with relevant cancer-related clinical variables in relation to survival and allocation of treatment. Those analyses were performed by line 1, 2 or 3 of treatment for mBC. Results The ESME program included 23,698 pts of whom 1897 with HR+/HER2- mBC received at least 1 dose of EVE and were diagnosed after 2012. Median age was 63 y (22-103). EVE pts were slightly younger than non-EVE pts (25.9% and 23.7% under 52 y, respectively, p=0.0574). EVE treated pts had more frequent non visceral metastases (52.3% vs 47.9%) and bone only metastases (38.5% vs 31.3%) at metastatic diagnosis, and less symptoms at mBC diagnosis (42.4% vs 47.5%) than non-EVE pts (all p values HR (CI95%)p value12 months OS EVE vs not (unadjusted Kaplan Meier)Line 10.34 (0.16-072).005497% vs 93%Line 20.34 (0.22-0.52) Citation Format: Hélène Francois-Martin, Audrey Lardy-Cleaud, Barbara Pistilli, Christelle Levy, Véronique Diéras, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Séverine Guiu, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Audrey Mailliez, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Thierry Petit, Mony Ung, Isabelle Desmoulins, Paule Augereau, Thomas Bachelot, Lionel Uwer, Marc Debled, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Corinne Veyret, Antony Goncalves, Michael Chevrot, Paul H Cottu. Long term results with everolimus in advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer in a multicenter national real world observational study (ESME) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-19.

ImportanceEvidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022.ExposuresPatients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMedian overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.ResultsAmong 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR– (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR− tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P P Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.

Purpose Androgen Receptor (AR) + triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 25% of all TNBC. Several trials using different antiandrogens (AA) found clinical benefit rates (CBR) ranging from 19 to 29%. The aim of this retrospective trial was to assess the clinical benefit of AA in real life. Methods Patients with metastatic AR + TNBC who have received at least one dose of an AA (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide or bicalutamide) were eligible. Assessable patients received at least 4 weeks of AA and at least one tumor assessment. The primary end-point was CBR at 6 months defined as patients exhibiting an objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months. Results A total of 26 patients were eligible and 24 patients were assessable. Median age at initiation of AA was 70 years (range 50–90). Fifty percent exhibited liver and/or lung metastases. Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 3 (range 0–10). AA used were: abiraterone acetate (62%), enzalutamide (8%) and bicalutamide (30%). CBR at 6 months was 29% (7/24) with 5 OR (2 CR, 3 PR) and 2 SD. Fifty-seven percent (4/7) of patients with a 6-months CBR received AA in first line versus 18% (3/17) in later lines. Four patients had a clinical benefit > 12 months. There were no grade > 2 side effects. Conclusion Real-life efficacy of AA use in metastatic AR + TNBC are in line with data from published trials. A proportion of AR + TNBC patients benefit from AA and with some deriving long-term clinical benefit.

PURPOSE Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, improves progression-free survival in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitor–resistant metastatic breast cancer. However, the benefit of adding everolimus to ET in the adjuvant setting in early breast cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized double-blind phase III study, women with high-risk, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to everolimus or placebo for 2 years combined with standard ET. Stratification factors included ET agent, receipt of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, progesterone receptor status, duration of ET before random assignment, and lymph node involvement. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01805271 ). RESULTS Between June 2013 and March 2020, 1,278 patients were randomly allocated to receive everolimus or placebo. At the first interim analysis, the trial was stopped for futility and a full analysis undertaken once data snapshot complete. One hundred forty-seven patients have had a DFS event reported and at 3 years, DFS did not differ between patients who received ET plus everolimus (88% [95% CI, 85 to 91]) or ET plus placebo (89% [95% CI, 86 to 91; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = .77]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 22.9% of patients (29.9% with everolimus v 15.9% with placebo, P < .001). 53.4% everolimus-treated patients permanently discontinued experimental treatment early compared with placebo-treated 22.3%. CONCLUSION Among high-risk patients, everolimus added to adjuvant ET did not improve DFS. Tolerability was a concern, with more than half of patients stopping everolimus before study completion. Everolimus cannot be recommended in the adjuvant setting.

PurposeMore than 10% of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) will develop Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases as first and isolated site of relapse on trastuzumab and pertuzumab first line therapy. However, few clinical data are available to guide the best strategy in this setting.MethodsPatients experiencing isolated CNS progression on trastuzumab and pertuzumab first line therapy were retrospectively identified from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) real life database between 2008 and 2016. ResultsAmong 995 patients treated with first line trastuzumab and pertuzumab for HER2-positive mBC, 132 patients (13%) experienced isolated CNS progression with a median time of 12 months after mBC diagnosis. Twelves patients did not received any treatment and were excluded from the analysis. Among the 120 patients considered, 76 (63%) received CNS-directed local therapy, 73 (60%) continued trastuzumab and pertuzumab whereas 47 (39%) started another systemic treatment. After a median follow up of 21 months, there was no difference in progression free survival for patient who continued trastuzumab-pertuzumab or switched to another systemic treatment. In multivariate analysis, trastuzumab-pertuzumab continuation was associated with longer OS (HR 0,28 IC95%: 0,14-0,54 p

Background: Approximately 10-30% of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (BC) are diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and are associated with a poor prognosis. Due to improving diagnostics and treatments in BC, and therefore longer pt survival, more CNS metastases in breast cancer pts are readily detected. However, pts with CNS metastases are often excluded from clinical trials. Ribociclib (RIB), an oral, selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, is approved for use in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in women with HR+, HER2- ABC. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of pts with CNS metastases at baseline from the Core Phase of CompLEEment-1 (NCT02941926), a Phase IIIb trial of RIB in combination with letrozole (LET) in pts with HR+, HER2- ABC. The eligibility criteria for this study allowed a broader and more diverse pt population than those of previous Phase III trials of RIB + LET, to reflect a typical real-world clinical setting. Methods: CompLEEment-1 included women of any menopausal status and men with HR+, HER2- ABC treated with ≤1 line of prior chemotherapy and no prior hormonal therapy for advanced disease. Pts received RIB (600 mg QD, 3 weeks on/1 week off) in combination with LET (2.5 mg QD, continuous). Men and premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (3.6 mg goserelin or 7.5 mg leuprolide, Q28D). This subgroup analysis assessed the primary outcomes (safety and tolerability) and secondary outcomes of time to progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in pts with CNS metastases. Results: At the data cutoff date (November 8, 2019), 51 pts with CNS metastases (1.57%; total pt population N = 3,246) had been evaluated: median age was 56.0 years, 30 (58.8%) pts were postmenopausal, and ECOG PS Citation Format: Paul Cottu, Michelino De Laurentiis, Paolo Marchetti, Luigi Coltelli, Nadia Califaretti, Marc Debled, Shekar Patil, Ella Evron, Francois Duhoux, Lakshmi Menon-Singh, Jiwen Wu, Katie Zhou, Javier Salvador Bofill. Ribociclib + letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and central nervous system metastases: Subgroup analysis of the phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS14-07.

Background: About 40% of breast cancer cases occur in women 65 years old (yo) or older and 20% in women over 75 yo. These numbers are expected to increase in the near future. Ironically, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials with no improvement in the past decade, although they may present different efficacy/toxicity profiles compared with younger adults. In this context, real life cohorts may bring valuable insight to identify potential barriers to recruitment of older patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials. Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC Data Platform, a multi-center real life database using a retrospective data collection process in 18 French Cancer Centers. Cases selected were adult patients with MBC whose first metastasis was treated between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016. We selected MBC women over 70 yo at the time of MBC diagnosis, with at least one line of systemic treatment and no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to describe factors associated with enrollment in clinical trials in older patients, using a multivariable Cox model. Factors included in this model were age (continuous, and by class), period (2008-2011 vs 2012-2016), phenotype (ER+, HER2+, or ER- HER2-), ECOG Performance Status (PS), treatment, metastatic sites (brain, visceral, nodes/bone only) and number, and volume of hospital activity. No geriatric description could be extracted from the database. Results: There were 5846 patients ≥70yo (median age 77) and 15892 patients < 70 yo. Of the older ones, 245 (4.2%) were enrolled in a clinical trial in first line compared with 1602 (10%) for younger ones. Most of the older patients in this cohort (66%) had ER+ HER2+ disease, half had visceral metastases (< 3 metastatic sites in 82%). Median follow-up of older patients was 46.3 months; 95%CI 44.8-49.0. Cause of death was related to disease in 1155 (33.9%) older patients, and related to another cause or unknown in 2156 (63.3%), data were missing for 2441 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 34.1 months in the older population, 95%CI 32.9-35.4, and specific overall survival was 70.8 months, 95%CI 66.3-80.0. Significant factors identified in the multivariable analysis for enrollment in 1st line treatment clinical trial ≥70 are shown in table. Volume of activity was not identified as one. By multivariate analysis, participation of older patients to a clinical trial was associated with an increased OS (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) but not with a better breast cancer specific survival (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.68-1.29). Conclusions: In this large real-life database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones. Factors associated with such participation to clinical research were younger age (< 80 yo), good PS, HER2+ disease, and investigational treatment consisting of chemotherapy or targeted therapy. There was a small improvement in accruing older patients between 2007-2011 and 2012-2016 (2.6% versus 5.5%). Most of these factors raise questions on drug availability and perceived potential benefits by investigators and medical teams. Accrual of older patients with cancer in other disease types should be more encouraged. VariableOR95%CIAge vs 70-75 75-80 80-85 85+0.74 0.47 0.170.54-1 0.31-0.71 0.06-0.37MBC diagnosis period vs 2008-2011 2012-20161.671.23-2.27Phenotype vs Others HER2+1.761.26-2.45PS vs 0 1 2-40.71 0.150.5-1 0.08-0.26Treatment4.88 5.253.08-7.9 3.48-8.14Chemotherapy vs others4.883.08-7.9Targeted treatment vs others5.253.48-8.14 Citation Format: Michael Bringuier, Matthieu Carton, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, David Pasquier, Marc Debled, Olivier Rigal, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Isabelle Desmoulins, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Florence Dalenc, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Thierry Petit, Michael Chevrot, Coralie Courtinard, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Capucine Baldini. Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-46.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) carry a deleterious germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Retrospective studies suggest that overall survival (OS) is equivalent between gBRCAm carriers and non-carriers with metastatic BC (MBC). We aimed to use the large ESME multicentre national MBC database to compare outcomes of gBRCAm carriers, gBRCA wild-type (WT) and not tested (NT) pts. METHODS: We used the large ESME MBC database (NCT03275311), a unique national cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. All pts with data available regarding gBRCA testing were selected for the present analysis. 26 pts with non-BRCA germline mutations were classified in the WT group. The primary endpoint was OS from date of treatment initiation in the 3 groups of patients: gBRCAm, gBRCA WT and gBRCA NT.Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival under first line treatment (PFS1), clinical and biological characteristics of the 3 groups and prognostic factors for OS. Multivariable analyses included the main known prognostic factors (age at MBC, MBC subtype, disease-free interval, presence of visceral disease, number of metastatic sites). They were conducted using Cox proportional analyses. RESULTS: 20624 pts were included in this analysis (414 gBRCAm, 1710 WT, 18500 gBRCA NT). Pts and disease characteristics are summarized in table 1. As expected, patients with gBRCAm were younger and had a higher rate of TNBC and G3 tumors. Median follow-up was 50.5 months (95%CI 49.7-51.5). Non-adjusted median OS was 30.6 months [21.9-34.3] in the gBRCAm group, 35.8 [32.2-37.8] in the WT and 39.3 [38.3-40.3] in NT groups. Median PFS1 was 7.9 months [6.6-9.3] in the gBRCAm group, 7.8 [7.3-8.5] in the WT and 9.7 months [ 9.5-10.0] in the NT groups. In multivariable analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly different between MBC patients with gBRCA and others (respective HRs 1.01 [0.88;1.17], p=0.87 and 0.94 [0.84;1.06], p=0.31). CONCLUSION: In this large scale real-life ESME MBC database analysis, outcomes of gBRCAm carriers with MBC do not differ from non carriers or not tested subgroups, when adjusted for other prognostic factors. Table 1: characteristics of patients and diseasegBRCAm. gBRCA WT. gBRCA NT Pvalue (chi-2)N = 414 N = 1710 N = 18500 Age (years) median [range]45 [23-82]48 [20- 88]61 [22-103]p Citation Format: Audrey Mailliez, Veronique D'Hondt, Amelie Lusque, Olivier Caron, Luc Cabel, Antony Goncalves, Marc Debled, Laurence Gladieff, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Thierry Petit, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Gaëtane Simon, Suzette Delaloge. Outcomes of germline BRCA carriers versus non-carriers in the french national metastatic breast cancer ESME cohort 2008-2016 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.

OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate the impact of local surgery performed during the year following metastatic breast cancer (MBC) diagnosis on patients' outcomes from a large real-life cohort. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Locoregional treatment for patients with MBC at the time of diagnosis remains debated. METHODS Women with newly diagnosed, de novo stage IV MBC and who started MBC treatment between January 2008 and December 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers were included (NCT03275311). The impact of local surgery performed during the first year on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model in a 12 month-landmark analysis. RESULTS Out of 16,703 patients in the ESME database, 1,977 had stage IV MBC at diagnosis, were alive and progression-free at 12 months and eligible for this study. Among them, 530 (26.8%) had received primary breast cancer surgery within 12 months. A greater proportion of patients who received surgery had less than 3 metastatic sites than the no-surgery group (90.8% vs 78.2%, p < 0.0001). Surgery within 12 months was associated with treatment with chemotherapy, HER2-targeted therapy (89.1% vs 69.6%, p < 0.0001) and locoregional radiotherapy (81.7% vs 32.5%, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses showed that surgery performed within 12 months was associated with longer OS and PFS (adjusted HR [95%CI] = 0.75 [0.61 - 0.92] and 0.72 [0.63 - 0.83], respectively), which were also affected by pattern and number of metastatic sites, histological subtype and age. CONCLUSIONS In the large ESME cohort, surgery within one year after de novo MBC diagnosis was associated with a significantly better OS and PFS.

The impact of single-agent antibodies against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as maintenance therapy is unknown in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The SAFIR02-BREAST IMMUNO substudy included patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her2)-negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease did not progress after six to eight cycles of chemotherapy. Patients (n = 199) were randomized to either durvalumab (10 mg kg−1 every 2 weeks) or maintenance chemotherapy. In the overall population, durvalumab did not improve progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.96; P = 0.047) or overall survival (OS; adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.54–1.29; P = 0.423). In an exploratory subgroup analysis, durvalumab improved OS in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 82; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30–0.97, P = 0.0377). Exploratory analysis showed that the HR of death was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.12–1.13) for patients with PD-L1+ TNBC (n = 32) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.18–1.34) for those with PD-L1− TNBC (n = 29). In patients with TNBC, exploratory analyses showed that the HR for durvalumab efficacy (OS) was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.05–0.71; log-rank test, P = 0.0059) in patients with CD274 gain/amplification (n = 23) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.42–2.99; log-rank test, P = 0.8139) in patients with CD274 normal/loss (n = 32). Tumor infiltration by lymphocytes (CD8, FoxP3 and CD103 expressions) and homologous recombination deficiency did not predict sensitivity to durvalumab in exploratory analyses. This latter finding should be interpreted with caution since only one patient presented a germline BRCA mutation. The present study provides a rationale to evaluate single-agent durvalumab in maintenance therapy in patients with TNBC. Exploratory analyses identified CD274 amplification as a potential biomarker of sensitivity. Maintenance chemotherapy was more effective than durvalumab in patients with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative disease. Exploratory analyses from the phase 2 randomized SAFIR02-IMMUNO trial identify biomarkers associated with improved outcomes to durvalumab as compared to maintenance chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Variations in clinical response to tamoxifen (TAM) may be related to polymorphic cytochromes P450 (CYPs) involved in forming its active metabolite endoxifen (ENDO). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for tamoxifen and six metabolites to determine clinically relevant factors of ENDO exposure. Concentration-time data for TAM and 6 metabolites come from a prospective, multicenter, 3-year follow-up study of adjuvant TAM (20 mg/day) in patients with breast cancer, with plasma samples drawn every 6 months, and genotypes for 63 genetic polymorphisms (PHACS study, NCT01127295). Concentration data for TAM and 6 metabolites from 928 patients (n = 27,433 concentrations) were analyzed simultaneously with a 7-compartment PopPK model. CYP2D6 phenotype (poor metabolizer (PM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), normal metabolizer (NM), and ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM)), CYP3A4*22, CYP2C19*2, and CYP2B6*6 genotypes, concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors, age, and body weight had a significant impact on TAM metabolism. Formation of ENDO from N-desmethyltamoxifen was decreased by 84% (relative standard error (RSE) = 14%) in PM patients and by 47% (RSE = 9%) in IM patients and increased in UM patients by 27% (RSE = 12%) compared with NM patients. Dose-adjustment simulations support an increase from 20 mg/day to 40 and 80 mg/day in IM patients and PM patients, respectively, to reach ENDO levels similar to those in NM patients. However, when considering Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), a dose increase to 60 mg/day in PM patients seems sufficient. This PopPK model can be used as a tool to predict ENDO levels or AAS according to the patient's CYP2D6 phenotype for TAM dose adaptation.

Everolimus is the first oral targeted therapy widely used in advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact of everolimus-based therapy on overall survival in the ESME-MBC database, a national metastatic breast cancer cohort that collects retrospective data using clinical trial-like methodology including quality assessments. We compared 1693 patients having received everolimus to 5928 patients not exposed to everolimus in the same period. Overall survival was evaluated according to treatment line, and a propensity score with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was built to adjust for differences between groups. Crude and landmark overall survival analyses were all compatible with a benefit from everolimus-based therapy. Adjusted hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16–0.72, p = 0.0054), 0.34 (95% CI: 0.22–0.52, p < 0.0001), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.14–0.36, p < 0.0001) for patients treated with everolimus in line 1, 2, and 3 and beyond, respectively. No clinically relevant benefit on progression-free survival was observed. Causes for everolimus discontinuation were progressive disease (56.2%), adverse events (27.7%), and other miscellaneous reasons. Despite the limitations inherent to such retrospective studies, these results suggest that adding everolimus-based therapy to the therapeutic sequences in patients with advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer may favorably affect overall survival.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) in young women merits a specific approach given the associated fertility, genetic and psychosocial issues. De novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in young women is an even more serious condition, with limited data available. Methods: We evaluated management of women aged ⩽40 years with de novo MBC in a real-life national multicentre cohort of 22,463 patients treated between 2008 and 2016 (NCT0327531). Our primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in young women versus women aged 41–69 years. The secondary objectives were to compare first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) and to describe treatment patterns. Results: Of the 4524 women included, 598 (13%) were ⩽40 years. Median age at MBC diagnosis was 36 years (range = 20–40). Compared with women aged 41–69 years, young women had more grade III tumours (49% versus 35.7%, p Conclusion: De novo MBC affects a significant proportion of young women. A subgroup of these patients achieves long OS and merits multidisciplinary care.

The reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mastectomy then immediate breast reconstruction is currently proposed for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Few studies have compared it to the standard sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy with or without differed reconstruction. Our study compares overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survivals of breast cancer patients treated with reverse sequence compared to the standard technique.In this retrospective, single center study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in France, patients were included if: female, agelt;65y, had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, and were M0. Outcomes for patients treated by reverse sequence (RS) are compared to those for patients treated by standard sequence (ST). Data was collected from medical records.From January 2009 to April 2018, 222 eligible patients were treated, 46 by RS and 176 by ST. Mean follow-up was 61.7 months. Five-year OS and RFS did not differ between groups. 5-yr OS: 88.4% 95%CI [74.1-95.0] for RS and 81.5% 95%CI [74.0-87.0] for ST (P = 0.4412); 5-yr RFS: 78.3% 95%CI [61.9-88.3] for RS and 70.1% 95%CI [62.2-76.7] for ST (P = 0.3003). Overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the RS group, and the rate of severe surgical complications did not differ between groups.For locally advanced breast cancer patients with an indication for radiation therapy the reverse sequence offers similar safety and efficacy results as the standard treatment while allowing immediate breast reconstruction. However, careful patient selection is necessary, particularly with regard to preoperative lymph node invasion.

PURPOSE: A major question when treating HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is whether early introduction of chemotherapy (CT) increases endocrine resistance. We aimed to describe progression-free survival (PFS) under first endocrine therapy (ET) depending on whether given before or after CT in a large nationwide cohort, in the pre-CDK era. METHODS: The real-life retrospective ESME database includes all patients with MBC whose first-line treatment was initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. Our primary objective was to compare PFS from start of first ET in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received ET or CT first. RESULTS: We identified 6293 patients who received at least one ET line during their first two therapeutic lines for MBC. As first-line therapy, 3832 (60.9%) received ET alone (ET1 1st group), whilst 2461 (39.1%) received CT, including 2024 patients (32.2%) with maintenance ET after CT (ET1 after CT group). Median PFS under first ET was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.9-13.1) in ET 1st group vs. 12.6 months in ET1 after CT group (95% CI 12.1-13.4), HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.01, P = 0.1277). CONCLUSIONS: PFS under first ET appears identical whether prescribed before or after chemotherapy. These data suggest chemotherapy does not promote endocrine resistance.

The similarities between sporadic basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) and BRCA1-mutated breast tumours raise the possibility that deregulation of the same pathway may underlie these tumour types. The aim of this study was to determine if PTEN aberrations are characteristic of both BRCA1 tumours and sporadic TN breast carcinomas with low BRCA1 expression, and can thus be used to identify sporadic tumours potentially sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Twelve BRCA1 tumours, 19 non-BRCA familial breast tumours and 71 unselected TN breast carcinomas were screened for PTEN mutations and assessed for PTEN expression and BRCA1 mRNA expression. Loss of PTEN expression was observed in 67% of BRCA1 tumours and more specifically in 89% of TN BRCA1 tumours highlighting the link between PTEN loss and BLBC in the context of germline BRCA1 mutations. Regarding unselected TN tumours, 56% showed PTEN expression loss and 35% displayed low BRCA1 mRNA expression. Unlike familial breast cancers with low BRCA1 mRNA expression, no significant correlation was observed between the loss of PTEN expression and low BRCA1 mRNA expression in this unselected TN tumours panel. Our data suggest that, unlike the germinal context, PTEN and BRCA1 alterations in sporadic TN breast tumours are independent events.

Introduction. Evidence suggests that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to the hormone receptor (HR) status. We aimed to evaluate the impact of HR status in this population extracted from a large real-world database. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of HER2+ MBC patients (pts) included in the real world ESME MBC database (NCT03275311) between 2008 and 2017. Descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to report characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors. Results. Of 4,145 HER2+ MBC pts eligible for our analysis, 1,449 (35%) had HR-negative (HR-), while 2,696 (65%) had HR-positive (HR+) tumors. Pts with HR- tumors had metastases earlier (median 9.3 vs 28.0 mo from primary cancer), had more often de novo MBC (47.6% vs 38.1%), grade III tumors (50.9% vs 33.6%), visceral metastases (70.9% vs 60.8%) and less often bone only disease (8.4% vs 21.1%) compared to those with HR+ tumors, all p Cox multivariable model for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive MBCCategoriesNHazard ratio95% CIp valueTumor gradeGrade I/II17711 Citation Format: Luc Cabel, Matthieu Carton, Veronique Dieras, Thierry Petit, Severine Guiu, Corinne Veyret, Anthony Goncalves, Lionel Uwer, Paule Augereau, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Levy, Florence Dalenc, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier, Marc Debled, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Barbara Pistilli, Jean Sebastien Frenel, Michael Chevrot, Audrey Mailliez, Marcela Carausu. Impact of hormone receptor status on clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes among HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in the ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-05-02.

Proof of concept studies has reported that circulating endothelial cell (CEC) count may be associated with the outcome of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated by chemotherapy and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. We report the results obtained in an independent prospective validation cohort (COMET study, NCT01745757). The main baseline criteria were HER2-negative mBC, performance status 0–2 and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. CECs were detected by CellSearch® from 4 ml of blood at baseline and after 4 weeks of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab therapy. CEC counts (considered both as a continuous variable and using the previously described 20 CEC/4 ml cutoff) were associated with clinical characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS). CEC count was obtained in 251 patients at baseline and in 207 patients at 4 weeks. Median baseline CEC count was 22 CEC/4 ml (range 0–2231). Baseline CEC counts were associated with performance status (p = 0.02). No statistically significant change in CEC counts was observed between baseline and 4 weeks of therapy. High baseline CEC count was associated with shorter PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses (continuous: p

Background Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) behaviour differs depending on hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) statuses. Methods The kinetics of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (CNS metastasis-free survival, CNSM-FS) and subsequent patient’s prognosis (overall survival, OS) according to the molecular subtype were retrospectively assessed in 16703 MBC patients of the ESME nationwide multicentre MBC database (Kaplan–Meier method). Results CNS metastases occurred in 4118 patients (24.6%) (7.2% at MBC diagnosis and 17.5% later during follow-up). Tumours were HER2−/HR+ (45.3%), HER2+/HR+ (14.5%), HER2+/HR− (14.9%) and triple negative (25.4%). Median age at CNS metastasis diagnosis was 58.1 years (range: 22.8–92.0). The median CNSM-FS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 16.5–17.9) among patients who developed CNS metastases. Molecular subtype was independently associated with CNSM-FS (HR = 3.45, 95% CI: 3.18–3.75, triple-negative and HER2−/HR+ tumours). After a 30-month follow-up, median OS after CNS metastasis diagnosis was 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2–8.4). OS was independently associated with subtypes: median OS was 18.9 months (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50–0.64) for HER2+/HR+ , 13.1 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65–0.81) for HER2+/HR−, 4.4 months (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42–1.69) for triple-negative and 7.1 months for HER2−/HR+ patients (p Conclusions Tumour molecular subtypes strongly impact incidence, kinetics and prognosis of CNS metastases in MBC patients. Clinical trial registration NCT03275311.

International audience; Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real-life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti-HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2- patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to "Other chemotherapies" patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth-line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p

Introduction Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is proposed for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to increase the breast conservative treatment (BCT). In France, mastectomy is the risk-reducing prophylactic surgical strategy only for pre-symptomatic germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) patients. On the other hand, BCT is proposed to all patients following NAC based on clinical response, regardless the gBRCAm status. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the risk of local recurrence (LR) according to BRCA status. Patients and methods Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated for unilateral LABC, T2-3, N≥0, M0 by NAC, and (ii) patients who underwent germline BRCA screening. , using targeted next-generation screening, was carried out either during NAC (rapid process) or after surgery. Deleterious mutations were confirmed using Sanger sequencing before passing on the results to the clinical geneticist. Some gBRCAm patients from Olympia study were also included. Patients were followed-up over a long term for overall survival, LR and disease-free survival. Chi-square and Fischer test were used to generate statistical comparison. Results Between 2007 and 2015, 988 women were treated for LABC at our institution. Among them, 151 patients underwent clinical genetic testing for gBRCAm based on these criteria: young age at diagnosis or familial history of breast or ovarian cancer or histological characteristics as grade 2/3, Her2-3+ or basal like. A total of 122 patients were included in the study; 28 patients had gBRCAm status and no mutations were detected in 94 patients (wtBRCA). Significant differences between the two groups (gBRCAm vs wtBRCA) were observed for Mean age, (36.7 vs 40.1y (p=0.0032) , Intrinsic tumor subtypes basal like (64.3% vs 42.5%, p=0.0432) ER are more often negative (21.4% vs 46.8%, p=0.0165). Among the 30 patients who underwent BRCA screening during NAC and eligible for BCT, 8 of the 9 patients with gBRCAm choose mastectomy (88%). Among the 92 patients with screening mutation after breast cancer treatment, 5 of the 19 patients with gBRCAm had a mastectomy (28%). In the 28 gBRCAm patients, 15 had a BCT and 13 a mastectomy. In the 94 wtBRCA patients, 67 had a BCT and 27 a mastectomy. After a follow-up of 4.32 years, we observed 8 relapses, 5 LRs after BCT and 3 contro-lateral relapses. Of the 5 LRs, 3 came from 15 gBRCAm with BCT and 2 of the 67 wtBRCA (p=0.0403). Discussion In this selected subgroup of patients, gBRCAm rate is higher (23%) than the rate based on familial criteria for BRCA testing (12%). Regarding the rationale for BCT or mastectomy procedure in LABC and pre-symptomatic gBRCAm patients, this study led us to establish mastectomy as risk-reducing strategy in a sole surgery procedure for gBRCAm patients. Moreover, 88% gBRCAm patients chose mastectomy; the mastectomy rate was lower when the patient was unaware of their BRCA status (26%). The LR rate was higher in the gBRCAm vs wtBRCA with a statistical difference. In LABC patients with high genetic risk, the knowledge of mutation status could influence patients' and surgeons' choice of surgery. In case of gBRCAm status, mastectomy is recommended to decrease LR risk. Citation Format: Tunon de Lara C, Leroux J, Bonnet F, Debled M, Barrouk-Simonet E, Quenel-Tueux N, Lagarde P, Chassaigne F, Esnaud T, Fournier M, Bubien V, Breton-Callu C, Charitansky H, Petit A, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Macgrogan G, Longy M, Sevenet N. Risk reducing strategy in germline BRCA mutated patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Establishing mastectomy as a preventing procedure of local recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-09-07.

Since 2005, 12 months of trastuzumab added to chemotherapy alone is the standard of care in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. PHARE ('Protocol for Herceptin® as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure') is the first trial comparing a reduction of adjuvant trastuzumab versus the standard 12 months. In 2012, the first analysis failed to prove that 6-months was non-inferior to 12-months of adjuvant trastuzumab (NCT00381901). The current presentation reports the final analysis. Methods: The trial was sponsored by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) (www.e-cancer.fr), and approved by central Ethical Committee on May 15th 2006. Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned between 12 and 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab duration. The randomization was stratified by concomitant or sequential trastuzumab administration with chemotherapy, estrogen receptor (ER) status and center. The primary objective was non-inferiority of 6- versus 12-months arms in the intent to treat population, in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) with a pre-specified hazard margin of 1.15. Overall Survival (OS) and metastasis free survival (MFS) were secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 3380 patients were randomized, their median age was 54 years (21-86). Patients and disease characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. No involved axillary node was observed in 54.5% of cases, 41.7% of tumors were ER negative. At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 704 events counting for DFS were observed. Between the 12- and 6-months arms, the adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for DFS rates was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.93-1.25; p=0.39) favoring the longer exposure. The 1.15 margin of non-inferiority was included in the 95%CI. No heterogeneity in terms of treatment effect was observed, no significant difference for trastuzumab duration effects was found in any subgroups.For OS and MFS, the adjusted HR were 1.13 (95%CI 0.92-1.39) and 1.15 (95%CI 0.96-1.37), respectively. Conclusion: The choice of the non-inferiority margin will remain inherently a subject of controversy especially in the context of oncology trials where the primary outcome is survival and the least additional death could be considered unacceptable questioning the very feasibility of such trials. Nevertheless, PHARE failed to show that 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months. The standard of care should remain 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. Citation Format: Pivot X, Romieu G, Debled M, Pierga J-Y, Kerbrat P, Bachelot T, Espie M, Lortholary A, Fumoleau P, Serin D, Jacquin J-P, Jouannaud C, Rios M, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Venat-Bouvet L, Cany L, Catala S, Khayat D, Gambotti L, Pauporte I, Faure Mercier C, Paget-Bailly S, Henriques J, Grouin J-M. PHARE randomized trial final results comparing 6 to 12 months of trastuzumab in adjuvant early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-07.

Background:Primary inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Survival of IBC patients has been improved by multimodal therapy. However 5-year overall survival (OS) still remains close to 50-60%, due to high risk of disseminated disease. Given the low incidence, prognosis of metastatic cases stages is poorly described. Methods:This study aimed to describe OS of IBC (T4d AJCC TNM classification) with upfront or recurrent metastatic disease compared with non-IBC patients in the ESME database (N=16,702 patients). OS was calculated from the diagnosis of metastasis to the date of death (from any cause), or censored to date of latest news. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS). Results:From 2008 to 2014, 7,465 patients with diagnosis of MBC and known clinical status of their primary tumor (T) were identified, including 582 IBC (T4d) and 6,883 non-IBC. As expected, metastatic IBC was associated with pejorative features compared to non-IBC, with less hormonal receptors-positive tumors (44% vs 65.6%), more HER2-positive (30% vs 18.6%) or triple-negative (25.9% vs 15.8%) cases (p Compared with non-IBC, synchronous metastatic IBC showed worse median OS and PFS (39.9 months [95%CI 34.2-45.3] vs 48.4 months [95%CI 46.3-50.8], p=0.0035; 10 months [95%CI 8.8-12.7] vs 14.5 months [95%CI 13.6-15.7], p=0.0027, respectively. Similar results were obtained in metachronous metastatic cases (20.01 months [95%CI 17.1-21.2] vs 32.8 months [95%CI 31.5-34.3], p Conclusion:In this large national and multicentric study, IBC is a major and independent factor associated with adverse outcome in metastatic setting. Of note, the independent adverse impact on PFS identified in this study may suggest a lower sensitivity of metastatic IBC to available therapeutics. However, results seem to improve in the last years. Detailed analysis according to phenotype will be available. Citation Format: Monneur A, Bertucci F, Lardy-Cleaud A, Augereau P, Debled M, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coudert B, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Ferrero J-M, Guiu S, Uwer L, Campone M, Cottu P, Jouannaud C, De la Motte Rouge T, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Simon G, Robain M, Viens P, Lerebours F, Gonçalves A. Metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: Clinical features and outcomes in the national, multicentric, real-life ESME cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-04.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) in young women merits a specific approach given the associated fertility, genetic and psychosocial issues. De novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in young women is an even more serious condition, with limited data available. Methods: We evaluated management of women aged ⩽40 years with de novo MBC in a real-life national multicentre cohort of 22,463 patients treated between 2008 and 2016 (NCT0327531). Our primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in young women versus women aged 41–69 years. The secondary objectives were to compare first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) and to describe treatment patterns. Results: Of the 4524 women included, 598 (13%) were ⩽40 years. Median age at MBC diagnosis was 36 years (range = 20–40). Compared with women aged 41–69 years, young women had more grade III tumours (49% versus 35.7%, p

Purpose: Older cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to understand barriers to clinical trial recruitment in women aged 70 years old (yo) or over with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics MBC Data Platform, a French multi-center real life database. We selected MBC women over 70yo, without central nervous system metastases, with at least one line of systemic treatment, between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, and had no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients enrolled in clinical trials according to their age. Secondary objective was to identify variables associated with enrollment.Results: 5552 women were aged ≥ 70 (median 74yo; IQR72-77). 14611 were less than 70. Of the older ones, 239 (4%) were enrolled in a clinical trial during first line of treatment, compared with 1529 (10.5%) for younger ones. Multivariable analysis of variables predicting for enrollment during first line of treatment in older patients were younger age (OR 0.50 [95%CI; 0.33-0.76] for the 80-85yo class; OR 0.17 [95%CI; 0.06-0.39] for the 85yo and more class), good ECOG Performance Status (PS 0-1) (OR 0.15 [95%CI; 0.08-0.27] for the PS 2-4 class), HER2+ disease (OR 1.78 [95%CI; 1.27-2.48]), type of treatment (chemotherapy/targeted therapy/immunotherapy OR 5.01 [95%CI; 3.13-8.18]), and period (OR 1.65 [95%CI; 1.22–2.26] for 2012-2016, compared to 2008-2011).Conclusions: In this large database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones.

Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with high morbidity/mortality rates. Our study aimed to describe the largest-to-date real-life population of MBC patients treated with intrathecal (IT) therapy and to evaluate prognostic models. Methods The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database (NCT03275311) includes all consecutive patients who have initiated treatment for MBC since 2008. Overall survival (OS) of patients treated with IT therapy was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards models. Performance was evaluated using C-index and calibration plots. Results Of the 22 266 patients included in the database between 2008 and 2016, 312 received IT therapy and were selected for our analysis. Compared with non-IT-treated patients, IT-treated patients were younger at MBC relapse (median age: 52 years versus 61 years) and more often had lobular histology (23.4% versus 12.7%) or triple-negative subtype (24.7% versus 13.3%) (all P < 0.001). Median OS was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.6] and 1-year survival rate was 25.6%. Significant prognostic factors associated with poorer outcome on multivariable analysis were triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.47), treatment line ≥3 (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.73), ≥3 other metastatic sites (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.74) and IT cytarabine or thiotepa versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22), while concomitant systemic therapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62) (all P < 0.001). We validated two previously published prognostic scores, the Curie score and the Breast-graded prognostic assessment, both with C-index of 0.57. Conclusions MBC patients with LM treated with IT therapy have a poor prognosis. We could identify a subgroup of patients with better prognosis, when concomitant systemic therapy and IT methotrexate were used., Highlights • The outcome of BC patients with IT-treated LM is poor, with a median OS of 4.5 months. • Concomitant systemic therapy may improve the outcome in IT-treated patients. • Patients treated with IT methotrexate had better outcome than those treated with IT cytarabine/thiotepa. • The Curie and Breast-graded prognostic assessment scores were prognostic for IT-treated patients.

Background High Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer among postmenopausal women and an adverse prognostic factor in early-stage. Little is known about its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods The National ESME-MBC observational cohort includes all consecutive patients newly diagnosed with MBC between Jan 2008 and Dec 2016 in the 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. Results Of 22 463 patients in ESME-MBC, 12 999 women had BMI data available at MBC diagnosis. Median BMI was 24.9 kg/m2 (range 12.1–66.5); 20% of women were obese and 5% underweight. Obesity was associated with more de novo MBC, while underweight patients had more aggressive cancer features. Median overall survival (OS) of the BMI cohort was 47.4 months (95% CI [46.2–48.5]) (median follow-up: 48.6 months). Underweight was independently associated with a worse OS (median OS 33 months; HR 1.14, 95%CI, 1.02–1.27) and first line progression-free survival (HR, 1.11; 95%CI, 1.01; 1.22), while overweight or obesity had no effect. Conclusion Overweight and obesity are not associated with poorer outcomes in women with metastatic disease, while underweight appears as an independent adverse prognostic factor., Highlights • This is the first large multicenter cohort reporting BMI’s effect on outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer. • Overweight or obese status does not negatively influence outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients, whatever the subtype. • Underweight is a strong negative independent prognostic factor on outcomes, whatever the subtype.

The high sensitivity of PET-CT can identify hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathies during cancer management, but specificity is low and a biopsy is sometimes required to eliminate benign adenopathies.This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included patients with hypermetabolic mediastinal lymphadenopathies revealed on PET-CT during either the initial management of a cancer, treatment evaluation, or monitoring. All patients underwent EUS-FNA. Diagnoses of malignancy based on cytological analysis following EUS-FNA were compared with clinical and radiological follow-up information. The treatment strategy decided before the results of the EUS-FNA pathology reports (Multidisciplinary Team Meeting [MTM-1]) was recorded and compared to the treatment strategy decided once pathological data from EUS-FNA were available (MTM-2).Between 2013 and 2018, 75 patients were included with 47 eligible and evaluable patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EUS-FNA were 93%, 100%, 100% and 90%, respectively. The concordance value between the therapeutic strategies determined for MTM-1 and MTM-2 was 44.7%. There were no significant differences in the intensity of fixation on PET-CT between malignant and benign lesions.The diagnostic accuracy of the minimally invasive EUS-FNA procedure is sufficiently robust to avoid the need for diagnostic surgery. The combination of PET-CT and EUS-FNA may alter the therapeutic strategy that would be considered after PET-CT alone.NCT01892501.