Search

Supplementary Tables and Figures from Efficacy and Safety of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant, EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ERBB3 (HER3) is expressed in most EGFR-mutated lung cancers but is not a known mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibitors. HER3-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate consisting of a HER3 antibody attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. This phase I, dose escalation/expansion study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Among 57 patients receiving HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks, the confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI), 26.0–52.4], and median progression-free survival was 8.2 (95% CI, 4.4–8.3) months. Responses were observed in patients with known and unknown EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. Clinical activity was observed across a broad range of HER3 membrane expression. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were hematologic toxicities. HER3-DXd has clinical activity in EGFR TKI–resistant cancers independent of resistance mechanisms, providing an approach to treat a broad range of drug-resistant cancers.Significance:In metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, after disease progression on EGFR TKI therapy, treatment approaches include genotype-directed therapy targeting a known resistance mechanism or chemotherapy. HER3-DXd demonstrated clinical activity spanning known and unknown EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. HER3-DXd could present a future treatment option agnostic to the EGFR TKI resistance mechanism.See related commentary by Lim et al., p. 16.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

Treatment options for malignant pleural mesothelioma are scarce. Tazemetostat, a selective oral enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity in several haematological cancers and solid tumours. We aimed to evaluate the anti-tumour activity and safety of tazemetostat in patients with measurable relapsed or refractory malignant pleural mesothelioma.We conducted an open-label, single-arm phase 2 study at 16 hospitals in France, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with malignant pleural mesothelioma of any histology that was relapsed or refractory after treatment with at least one pemetrexed-containing regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and a life expectancy of greater than 3 months. In part 1 of the study, participants received oral tazemetostat 800 mg once on day 1 and then twice daily from day 2 onwards. In part 2, participants received oral tazemetostat 800 mg twice daily starting on day 1 of cycle 1, using a two-stage Green-Dahlberg design. Tazemetostat was administered in 21-day cycles for approximately 17 cycles. The primary endpoint of part 1 was the pharmacokinetics of tazemetostat and its metabolite at day 15 after administration of 800 mg tazemetostat, as measured by maximum serum concentration (CBetween July 29, 2016, and June 2, 2017, 74 patients were enrolled (13 in part 1 and 61 in part 2) and received tazemetostat, 73 (99%) of whom had BAP1-inactivated tumours. In part 1, following repeat dosing of tazemetostat at steady state, on day 15 of cycle 1, the mean CFurther refinement of biomarkers for tazemetostat activity in malignant pleural mesothelioma beyond BAP1 inactivation could help identify a subset of tumours that are most likely to derive prolonged benefit or shrinkage from this therapy.Epizyme.

Family caregivers provide complex care for patients with cancer, including management of multiple symptoms associated with the disease and its treatment.The objective of this pilot project was to develop and conduct feasibility testing of a family caregiver educational intervention for symptom management.The intervention was conducted with 23 family caregivers of patients with lung or gynecologic cancer to evaluate feasibility testing and assessment of caregiver preparedness, quality of life, and psychological distress at baseline and three and seven weeks postintervention.Family caregivers were very interested in education related to their role in symptom management, with management of constipation, dyspnea, and diarrhea as the highest priorities. The intervention was feasible and valuable in assisting family caregivers in assessing symptoms and making decisions regarding treatment choices.

PDF file - 91K

Purpose: Ganetespib is a novel inhibitor of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a chaperone protein critical to tumor growth and proliferation. In this phase II study, we evaluated the activity and tolerability of ganetespib in previously treated patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Experimental Design: Patients were enrolled into cohort A (mutant EGFR), B (mutant KRAS), or C (no EGFR or KRAS mutations). Patients were treated with 200 mg/m2 ganetespib by intravenous infusion once weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included objective response (ORR), duration of treatment, tolerability, median PFS, overall survival (OS), and correlative studies.Results: Ninety-nine patients with a median of 2 prior systemic therapies were enrolled; 98 were assigned to cohort A (n = 15), B (n = 17), or C (n = 66), with PFS rates at 16 weeks of 13.3%, 5.9%, and 19.7%, respectively. Four patients (4%) achieved partial response (PR); all had disease that harbored anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, retrospectively detected by FISH (n = 1) or PCR-based assays (n = 3), in crizotinib-naïve patients enrolled to cohort C. Eight patients (8.1%) experienced treatment-related serious adverse events (AE); 2 of these (cardiac arrest and renal failure) resulted in death. The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia.Conclusions: Ganetespib monotherapy showed a manageable side effect profile as well as clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLCs, particularly in patients with tumors harboring ALK gene rearrangement. Clin Cancer Res; 19(11); 3068–77. ©2013 AACR.

Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ERBB3 (HER3) is expressed in most EGFR-mutated lung cancers but is not a known mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibitors. HER3-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate consisting of a HER3 antibody attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. This phase I, dose escalation/expansion study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Among 57 patients receiving HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks, the confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI), 26.0–52.4], and median progression-free survival was 8.2 (95% CI, 4.4–8.3) months. Responses were observed in patients with known and unknown EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. Clinical activity was observed across a broad range of HER3 membrane expression. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were hematologic toxicities. HER3-DXd has clinical activity in EGFR TKI–resistant cancers independent of resistance mechanisms, providing an approach to treat a broad range of drug-resistant cancers. Significance: In metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, after disease progression on EGFR TKI therapy, treatment approaches include genotype-directed therapy targeting a known resistance mechanism or chemotherapy. HER3-DXd demonstrated clinical activity spanning known and unknown EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. HER3-DXd could present a future treatment option agnostic to the EGFR TKI resistance mechanism. See related commentary by Lim et al., p. 16. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

Background: Poor patients often reside in neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with high levels of airborne pollutants. They also have higher mortality from non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than those living in wealthier communities. We investigated whether living in polluted neighborhoods is associated with somatic mutations linked with lower survival rates, i.e., TP53 mutations. Methods: In a retrospective cohort of 478 patients with NSCLC treated at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2018, we used logistic regression to assess associations between individual demographic and clinical characteristics, including somatic TP53 mutation status and environmental risk factors of annual average particulate matter (PM2.5) levels, and neighborhood SES. Results: 277 patients (58%) had somatic TP53 mutations. Of those, 45% lived in neighborhoods with “moderate” Environmental Protection Agency–defined PM2.5 exposure, compared with 39% of patients without TP53 mutations. We found significant associations between living in neighborhoods with “moderate” versus “good” PM2.5 concentrations and minority population percentage [OR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.08]. There was a significant association between presence of TP53 mutations and PM2.5 exposure (moderate versus good: OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.02–2.72) after adjusting for patient characteristics, other environmental factors, and neighborhood-level SES. Conclusions: When controlling for individual- and neighborhood-level confounders, we find that the odds of having a TP53-mutated NSCLC are increased in areas with higher PM2.5 exposure. Impact: The link between pollution and aggressive biology may contribute to the increased burden of adverse NSCLC outcomes in individuals living in lower SES neighborhoods.

Background: Phase 1 clinical trials remain vital for oncology care. Patients on these trials require supportive care for quality-of-life (QOL) concerns. Objective: To test a Palliative Care Intervention (PCI) for patients with solid tumors enrolled in Phase I therapeutic trials with a priori hypothesis that psychological distress, QOL, satisfaction, symptoms, and resource utilization would be improved in the PCI group. Design: This unblinded randomized trial compared the PCI with usual care in patients accrued to Phase I Clinical Trials. Subjects (n = 479) were followed for 24 weeks, with 12 weeks as the primary outcome. Setting: Two Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the United States. Subjects: A consecutive sample, 21 years or older, English fluency, with solid tumors initiating a Phase 1 trial. Measurements: Psychological Distress (Distress Thermometer), QOL total and subscales (FACT-G), satisfaction (FAM-CARE), survival, and resource utilization (chart audit). Results: PCI subjects showed improved Psychological Distress (−0.47, p = 0.015) and Emotional Well-Being (0.81, p = 0.045), with differences on variables of QOL and distress between sites. High rates of symptom-management admissions (41.3%) and low rates of Advance Directive completion (39.0%), and hospice enrollment (30.7%), despite a median survival in both groups of 10.1 months from initiating a Phase 1 study. Conclusions: A nurse-delivered PCI can improve some QOL outcomes and distress for patients participating in Phase 1 trials. Greater integration of PC is needed to provide quality care to these patients and to support transitions from treatment to supportive care, especially at the end of life. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01612598.

Background To identify additional at-risk groups for lung cancer screening, which targets persons with a long history of smoking and thereby misses younger or nonsmoking cases, the authors evaluated germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma for an association with an accelerated onset. Methods The authors assembled a retrospective cohort (1999-2018) of oncogenetic clinic patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Eligibility required a family history of cancer, data on smoking, and a germline biospecimen to screen via a multigene panel. Germline PVs (TP53/EGFR, BRCA2, other Fanconi anemia [FA] pathway genes, and non-FA DNA repair genes) were interrogated for associations with the age at diagnosis via an accelerated failure time model. Results Subjects (n = 187; age, 28-89 years; female, 72.7%; Hispanic, 11.8%) included smokers (minimum of 5 pack-years; n = 65) and nonsmokers (lighter ever smokers [n = 18] and never smokers [n = 104]). Overall, 26.7% of the subjects carried 1 to 2 germline PVs: TP53 (n = 5), EGFR (n = 2), BRCA2 (n = 6), another FA gene (n = 11), or another DNA repair gene (n = 28). After adjustment for smoking, sex, and ethnicity, the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma was accelerated 12.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-20.6 years) by BRCA2 PVs, 9.0 years (95% CI, 0.5-16.5 years) by TP53/EGFR PVs, and 6.1 years (95% CI, -1.0 to 12.6 years) by PVs in other FA genes. PVs in other DNA repair genes showed no association. Germline associations did not vary by smoking. Conclusions Among lung adenocarcinoma cases, germline PVs (TP53, EGFR, BRCA2, and possibly other FA genes) may be associated with an earlier onset. With further study, the criteria for lung cancer screening may need to include carriers of high-risk PVs, and findings could influence precision therapy and reduce lung cancer mortality by earlier stage diagnosis.

Patient preferences (quantity vs quality of life; present vs future health) have not been investigated in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The goal of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate patient values toward treatment goals and competing health outcomes among adults with NETs.Patients with well-differentiated, grade 1 or 2, advanced NETs starting a new systemic therapy completed 4 tools: (1) Health Outcomes Tool, which ranks the importance of 4 outcomes (survival, function/independence, freedom from pain, freedom from symptoms); (2) Attitude Scale, which identifies the extent to which patients agree with statements related to health outcomes; (3) Now versus Later Tool, which ranks the relative importance of quality of life (QoL) now versus 1 and 5 years from now; and (4) Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, which identifies the amount of information the patient prefers to receive about their disease and treatment, the patient's treatment goal, the patient's perception of the physician's treatment goal, and self-reported health status.We recruited 60 patients with NETs (50.0% aged ≥65 years; 96.7% with stage IV disease). Primary tumor locations included the gastrointestinal tract (41.7%), pancreas (30.0%), and lung (21.7%). A plurality of patients reported maintaining independence as their most important health outcome (46.7%), followed by survival (30.0%), freedom from pain (11.7%), and freedom from symptoms (11.7%). A total of 67% of patients agreed with the statement, "I would rather live a shorter life than lose my ability to take care of myself"; 85.0% agreed with the statement, "It is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible." When asked to choose between current QoL versus QoL 1 year or 5 years in the future as more important, 48.3% and 40.0% of patients valued their QoL 1 year and 5 years in the future, respectively, more than their current QoL. Only 51.7% of patients believed their physician's treatment goals aligned with their own.Adult patients with NETs strongly value independence over survival. More communication between patients with NETs and their physicians is needed to ensure that patient preferences are incorporated into treatment plans.

Background KRAS mutations reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a significant percentage of patients diagnosed with NSCLC. However, there still remains no therapeutic option designed to target KRAS. In an era with immunotherapy as a dominant treatment option in metastatic NSCLC, the role of immunotherapy in. Kras mutated patients is not clear. Methods Eligible patients diagnosed with NSCLC and found to have a KRAS mutation were identified in an institutional lung cancer database. Demographic, clinical, and molecular data was collected and analyzed. Results A total of 60 patients were identified for this retrospective analysis. Majority of patients were Caucasian (73%), diagnosed with stage IV (70%) adenocarcinoma (87%), and had a KRAS codon 12 mutation (78%). Twenty percent of patients were treated with immunotherapy. Median overall survival was 28 months in the cohort and patients who received immunotherapy were found to have better survival versus those who did not (33 vs. 22 months, P=0.31). Furthermore, there was an association between high survival and patients who received immunotherapy (P=0.007). Conclusions Patients with KRAS mutations have a unique co-mutation phenotype that requires further investigation. Immunotherapy seems to be an effective choice of treatment for KRAS positive patients in any treatment-line setting and yields better outcomes than conventional chemotherapy. The relationship between immunotherapy and KRAS mutations requires further studies to confirm survival advantage.

Background Papulopustular rash is a common class effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that can affect patients’ health-related quality of life and cause disruptions to treatment. SWOG S1013 (NCT01416688) is a multi-center study designed to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy EGFRI 18 (FACT-EGFRI 18) using 7-items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess EGFRI-induced skin-related toxicities and their impact on functional status. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer to receive EGFRI therapies for at least 6 weeks were enrolled. Patient self-assessments using the FACT-EGFRI 18 were completed prior to undergoing CTCAE assessment by trained clinicians at baseline, weekly × 6, and then monthly × 3. The psychometric properties of the FACT-EGFRI 14 (skin toxicity items only) and 18 (plus 2 nail and 2 hair items) were established based on criterion validity, known groups validity, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to change. Results Of the 146 registered patients, 124 were evaluable. High Cronbach’s alpha (> 0.70) for both FACT-EGFRI 14 and FACT-EGFRI 18 scores across assessment times were observed. Although agreement (i.e. criterion validity) between individual and summary scales of the FACT-EGFRI 18 for assessing skin toxicity was good, agreement with the clinician-reported CTCAE was only fair. The minimal important difference was determined to be 3 points. The results also demonstrated responsiveness to symptom change. Discussion Based on the results of this multi-center validation study, the FACT-EGFRI 18 patient-reported outcome instrument provided data from the patient’s perspective yielding unique information as well as complementing clinician-rated CTCAE grades, especially for the symptoms of pain, pruritus, and paronychia. Conclusions Good to excellent psychometric properties for the FACT-EGFRI 18 were demonstrated, supporting further use of this patient-reported outcomes measure. Additional validation with a more diverse group of patients should be conducted.

Objectives Patients with cancer who are at a transition to Phase I investigational treatments have been identified as an underserved population with regard to palliative care. This disease transition is often accompanied by spiritual and existential concerns. The study objective was to conduct a secondary analysis of data from a larger study testing a palliative care intervention. This paper reports the findings of this secondary focus on the spiritual needs of this population. Methods Patients (n = 479) were accrued to this study prior to initiating a Phase I clinical trial with data collected at baseline, and 4, 12, and 24 week follow-up. Results Qualitative data revealed that the transition to Phase 1 trial participation is a time of balancing hope for extended life with the reality of advancing disease. Quantitative results demonstrated increased spirituality over time in both religious- and non-religious-affiliated patients. Conclusions Patients entering Phase I trials have important spiritual needs as they face treatment decisions, advancing disease, and often mortality. Spiritual care should be provided to seriously ill patients as a component of quality care.

Palliative care began in academic centers with specialty consultation services, and its value to patients, families, and health systems has been evident. The demand for palliative care to be integrated throughout the cancer trajectory, combined with a limited palliative care workforce, means that new models of care are needed. This review discusses evidence regarding the need for integration of palliative care into routine oncology care and describes best practices recognized for dissemination of palliative care. The available evidence suggests that palliative care be widely adopted by clinicians in all oncology settings to benefit patients with cancer and their families. Efforts are needed to adapt and integrate palliative care into community practice. Limitations of these models are discussed, as are future directions to continue implementation efforts. The benefits of palliative care can only be realized through effective dissemination of these principles of care, with more primary palliative care delivered by oncology clinicians.

EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may initially respond to therapy, but over time, resistance eventually occurs. In a small population (5–10%), these patients can have a histological transformation to SCLC. Nine patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma who transformed to SCLC were evaluated at City of Hope. Patient clinical and pathology data, including multiple next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, clinical therapies, histology, and outcomes, were collected across multiple time points. Descriptive statistics were utilized to visualize and interpret the clinical therapeutic timeline and molecular transformation profiles for these patients. All patients received at least one line of EGFR TKI therapies prior to small cell lung cancer transformation, including erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib. Two patients also received chemotherapy prior to transformation (one with immunotherapy). The median months to small cell lung cancer transformation was 16 months, ranging from 4–49 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 29 months from diagnosis, with the minimum of 16 months and maximum of 62 months. The majority of patients had EGFR exon 19 deletion (n = 7, 77.8%), and no patients had a change of original oncogenic EGFR mutation over the different time points. Though a TP53 mutation was detected in eight patients (88.9%) either at the first biopsy or the subsequent biopsies, an RB1 alteration was only detected in one patient at presentation, and three patients upon subsequent biopsies (n = 4, 44.4%). Each patient had a unique molecular profile in the subsequent molecular testing post-transformation, but BRAF alterations occurred frequently, including BRAF rearrangement (n = 1), fusion (n = 1), and amplification (n = 1). Our results showed that EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma to SCLC transformation patients have a unique histological, molecular, and clinical profile over multiple time points, with further heterogeneity that is not currently reported in the literature, and we suggest more work is required to better understand the molecular heterogeneity and clinical outcomes over time for this EGFR TKI resistance subtype.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The “Summary of the Guidelines Updates” section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

235 Background: The CARG tox score can predict risk of chemotherapy-related tox in older adults with cancer. GAIN can reduce tox vs standard of care (SOC) among these patients (pts); GAIN’s impact across CARG risk groups is unknown. Methods: A secondary analysis of the GAIN randomized clinical trial (NCT02517034) of pts aged ≥65 (solid tumor diagnosis, starting a new chemotherapy) was performed. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive GAIN vs SOC and were categorized into low (0-5), medium (6-9), and high (10-20) risk groups according to CARG score. The primary outcome was incidence of grade 3-5 tox. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare outcomes (GAIN vs SOC, stratified by risk groups). Log-rank tests were used to compare 1-year survival across risk groups. Results: This analysis included 600 pts: 26.5% low risk, 45.2% medium risk, 28.3% high risk. Table shows pt/treatment characteristics. For pts with low/medium risk scores, GAIN demonstrated a 14.0% (95% CI 4.1%-23.9%) reduction in tox vs SOC (p = 0.006). No significant reduction in tox was observed among pts with high risk scores (p = 0.86). One-year survival (GAIN vs SOC) for each risk group was 73.6% vs 67.4% (low risk), 68.5% vs 64.5% (medium risk), and 57.3% vs 61.7% (high risk), respectively (log-rank p = 0.10). Conclusions: Older adults with low/medium, but not high, CARG risk scores benefit from GAIN. Additional strategies may be needed to improve outcomes for pts with high CARG risk scores. Clinical trial information: NCT02517034. [Table: see text]

IMPORTANCE: Although geriatric assessment–driven intervention improves patient-centered outcomes, its influence on chemotherapy-related toxic effects remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether specific geriatric assessment–driven intervention (GAIN) can reduce chemotherapy-related toxic effects in older adults with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial enrolled 613 participants from a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center between 2015 and 2019. Patients were 65 years and older with a solid malignant neoplasm, were starting a new chemotherapy regimen, and completed a geriatric assessment. Patients were followed up until chemotherapy completion or 6 months after initiation, whichever occurred first. Data analysis was done by intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (2:1) to either the GAIN (intervention) or standard of care (SOC) arm. In the GAIN arm, a geriatrics-trained multidisciplinary team composed of an oncologist, nurse practitioner, social worker, physical/occupation therapist, nutritionist, and pharmacist reviewed geriatric assessment results and implemented interventions based on prespecified thresholds built into the geriatric assessment’s domains. In the SOC arm, geriatric assessment results were sent to treating oncologists for consideration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was incidence of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related toxic effects (graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0). Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion, emergency department visits, unplanned hospitalizations, average length of stay, unplanned hospital readmissions, chemotherapy dose modifications, and early discontinuation. Overall survival analysis was performed up to 12 months after chemotherapy initiation. RESULTS: Among the 605 eligible participants for analysis, median (range) age was 71 (65-91) years, 357 (59.0%) were women, and 432 (71.4%) had stage IV disease. Cancer types included gastrointestinal (202 [33.4%]), breast (136 [22.5%]), lung (97 [16.0%]), genitourinary (91 [15.0%]), gynecologic (54 [8.9%]), and other (25 [4.1%]). Incidence of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related toxic effects was 50.5% (95% CI, 45.6% to 55.4%) in the GAIN arm and 60.6% (95% CI, 53.9% to 67.3%) in the SOC arm, resulting in a significant 10.1% reduction (95% CI, −1.5 to −18.2%; P = .02). A significant absolute increase in advance directive completion of 28.4% with GAIN vs 13.3% with SOC (P

BackgroundWe conducted a2-part study to evaluate the incorporation of veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, into chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.Patients and methodsIn the phase I part, patients were treated successivelyat3dose levels of veliparib(40,80, and120mg) twice daily during CRT. In the phase II part, patients were randomized to receive veliparib or placebo during thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent weekly carboplatin andpaclitaxel, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib or placebo. The study was prematurely discontinued owing to the emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as standard of care.ResultsOf 21 patients enrolled in phase I, 2 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dysphagia (at 40 mg) and 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dehydration (at 80 mg). No DLTs were seen at veliparib dose of 120 mg twice daily, which was selected for the phase II part that enrolled 31 eligible patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the 2 arms (P=.20). For the veliparib and placebo arms, response rates were 56% and 69%, PFS at 1 year 47% and 46%, and overall survival at 1 year 89% and 54%, respectively.ConclusionVeliparib with CRT was feasible and well tolerated. Efficacy could not accurately be determined because of early study closure. Nonetheless, there is enthusiasm for the evaluation of PARP inhibitors in lung cancer as predictive biomarkers are being developed and combinations with immunotherapy are attractive.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. However, most individuals treated with TKI therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC will develop tumor resistance to TKI therapy. Therapeutic strategies to overcome TKI resistance are the topic of several ongoing clinical trials. One potential strategy, which has been explored in numerous trials, is the treatment of progressive sites of disease with stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We sought to review the literature pertaining to the use of local ablative radiation therapy in the setting of acquired resistance to TKI therapy and to discuss stereotactic radiation therapy as a strategy to overcome TKI resistance.

Introduction Preclinical evidence suggests the feedforward cytokine loop of interleukin-6/Janus kinases (JAK)/STAT3 plays a role in epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) resistance in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In this phase 1b study, the JAK1/2 and TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) inhibitor momelotinib was evaluated in combination with erlotinib in patients with EGFR TKI-naive, EGFR-mutated NSCLC. After erlotinib lead-in (50, 75, 100, or 150 mg oral daily [QD]), momelotinib was combined and dose escalated in a 3 + 3 study design. The primary endpoint of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of momelotinib was determined based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 28-day cycle. Secondary endpoints included efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results Eleven patients were enrolled across 3 dose levels of momelotinib (100 mg QD, 200 mg QD, and 100 mg twice daily [BID]). The MTD was momelotinib 200 mg QD in combination with erlotinib. Two DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia without fever and grade 3 diarrhea occurred at momelotinib 100 mg BID. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, dry skin, fatigue, and decreased appetite; the vast majority being grades 1–2. The overall response rate was 54.5% (90% CI 27.1–80.0; all partial) and median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (90% CI 6.2–12.4). Momelotinib did not affect the PK of erlotinib. Conclusions The JAK1/2 and TBK1 inhibitor momelotinib in combination with erlotinib did not appear to enhance benefit over the historical data of erlotinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02206763.

Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ERBB3 (HER3) is expressed in most

Lung cancer patients undergoing systemic treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that may warrant immediate hospitalization. Patients with thoracic malignancies hospitalized at City of Hope while undergoing treatment with ICIs were identified. Pathology and available next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, including the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and clinical information, including hospitalizations, invasive procedures, and the occurrence of irAEs, were collected. Unpaired T-tests, Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression were used to analyze our cohort. The overall survival (OS) was calculated and compared using univariate and multivariate COX models. Ninety patients with stage IV lung cancer were admitted after ICI treatment. Of those patients, 28 (31.1%) had documented irAEs. Genomic analyses showed an enrichment of LRP1B mutations (n = 5/6 vs. n = 7/26, 83.3% vs. 26.9%, odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.5 (1.7–166.1), p &lt, 0.05) and MLL3 mutations (n = 4/6, 66.7% vs. n = 5/26, 19.2%, OR (95% CI): 8.4 (1.3–49.3), p &lt, 0.05) in patients with irAE occurrences. Patients with somatic genomic alterations (GAs) in MET (median OS of 2.7 vs. 7.2 months, HR (95% CI): 3.1 (0.57–17.1), 0.05) or FANCA (median OS of 3.0 vs. 12.4 months, HR (95% CI): 3.1 (0.70–13.8), 0.05) demonstrated a significantly shorter OS. Patients with irAEs showed a trend toward improved OS (median OS 16.4 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.19) compared to hospitalized patients without documented irAEs. Lung cancer patients who required treatment discontinuance or interruption due to irAEs (n = 19) had significantly longer OS (median OS 18.5 vs. 6.2 months, HR (95% CI): 0.47 (0.28–0.79), 0.05). Our results showed a significant survival benefit in lung cancer patients hospitalized due to irAEs that necessitated a treatment interruption. Patients with positive somatic GAs in MET and FANCA were associated with significantly worse OS compared to patients with negative GAs.

The implication of MET alterations in solid tumors and the immune microenvironment remains elusive. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of 21 patients with solid tumors harboring MET alterations were used for immunohistochemical staining. Extracted RNA was analyzed with the NanoString nCounter human PanCancer immune profiling panel (NanoString Technologies, Inc., WA, USA). Patients were diagnosed with lung (n = 10), breast (n = 5), genitourinary (n = 3) or colorectal cancer (n = 3). Eleven had a MET missense mutation, four had an exon 14 splice site mutation and six had MET amplification. CD6, CCL19, CD40LG, XCR1, MAGEA1, ATM and CCL19 genes were significantly differentially expressed in MET-altered cancers. MET alterations may have a role in various solid tumors as potential therapeutic targets and combination therapy candidates with immune checkpoint inhibitors., Lay abstract MET is a receptor for growth signals that keeps cells alive and healthy. However, some tumors have changes in MET that allow for uncontrollable cell growth. Patients with MET-altered tumors may benefit from treatments targeting this gene, but eventually they become resistant to the treatments. Thus, there is a need to identify additional therapies for this patient population. The authors tested immune gene expression in tumors with MET alterations to determine if these patients would benefit from a new class of treatments called immunotherapies and found that patients with and without MET changes had differences in immune gene expression.

TPS2688 Background: The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related proteins MICA and MICB are stress-inducible, surface glycoproteins that are up-regulated on human tumors. MICA/MICB are ligands for the activating receptor, Natural Killer Group 2 member D (NKG2D) expressed on Natural Killer (NK) cells, CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells and iNKT cells. Proteases in the tumor microenvironment cleave MICA/MICB from the cell surface which enables tumor cells to evade immune cell recognition and destruction by NKG2D-expressing cells. Increased concentrations of shed MICA have been observed in serum from patients across multiple tumor types and correlate with poor survival. CLN-619 is a humanized, clinical-stage, MICA/MICB-specific IgG1 monoclonal antibody that prevents the proteolytic release of MICA/MICB thereby exposing tumor cells for immune destruction through both NKG2D-mediated and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). The antibody has been shown to restore the MICA/MICB-NKG2D axis to promote NK-mediated tumor cell lysis (AACR Annual Meeting abstract 3506, April 2022). In mice bearing MICA/MICB-expressing human tumor xenografts, CLN-619 treatment yielded robust anti-tumor activity at low doses. MICA/MICB is expressed in a wide range of solid tumors. Therefore, CLN-619 is expected to have broad anti-tumor activity. Methods: CLN-619 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation (phase 1) study as monotherapy, and in combination with pembrolizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort expansion in patients with specific indications as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab will be conducted. The phase 1 study explores ascending intravenous doses of CLN-619 as monotherapy (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) and in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg) in 21-day cycles to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key eligibility criteria include 1) histological or cytological diagnosis of cancer and 2) refractory metastatic disease, or locally advanced disease not amenable to local therapy. At the RP2D, CLN-619 monotherapy will be evaluated in non-small cell lung and cervical cancer. In parallel, a cohort of patients will be administered CLN-619 in combination with pembrolizumab. Serum levels of soluble MICA/MICB, identity of MICA/MICB alleles, phenotypes of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, cytokines and tumor biopsies will be investigated for correlative pharmacodynamic and predictive biomarkers. This clinical trial is in progress (NCT05117476) and has completed accrual of three participants at the first dose level. Clinical trial information: NCT05117476.

9014 Background: Osimertinib (Osi) is standard of care in 1st line (1L) EGFR mut NSCLC and TKI resistant T790Mpos NSCLC but acquired resistance emerges; outcomes are less robust in T790Mneg, C797Xpos and EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) disease. We examined Osi with the EGFR monoclonal antibody Necitumumab (Neci) in select settings of EGFR TKI resistance. Methods: Pts were accrued to 5 expansion cohorts (ExC) at recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Osi 80 mg daily and Neci 800 mg D1 + D8 of q21d cycle. ExC (18 pts/cohort): A) T790Mneg progressive disease (PD) on 1st/2nd gen TKI as last therapy, B) T790Mneg PD on 1st/2nd gen TKI and PD on 3rd gen TKI, C) T790Mpos PD on 1st/2nd gen TKI and PD on 3rd gen TKI, D) EGFR ex20ins PD on chemotherapy, E) PD on 1L osi. In ExC A-C, T790M was confirmed centrally (tissue) by ddPCR. Additional correlative studies include: tissue NGS (> 400 gene panel), EGFR FISH, plasma for PK and serial EGFR ctDNA by ddPCR. Adverse events were graded (Gr) by CTCAEv5; ORR, PFS by RECIST 1.1. Primary pre-specified efficacy endpoint ≥3/18 pts responding per cohort. Results: 101 patients accrued (100 evaluable). Efficacy is summarized in the Table. Drug related Gr 3 AEs were seen in 38% of pts, mainly rash (21%). ORR among all pts was 19% (95% CI 12-28%) that varied across cohorts (Table). In ExC A-C, 69% pts had detectable EGFR activating mutations in ctDNA, with decline in mutant allele frequency (AF) on treatment in 80% and ctDNA clearance in 33%. Conclusions: Osi/Neci is feasible and tolerable at the RP2D. EGFR ctDNA was detectable at baseline in the majority of pts with decrease in AF on treatment. Osi/Neci was active in select settings of EGFR-TKI resistance, meeting its prespecified efficacy endpoint in T790Mneg PD on 1st/2nd gen TKI as last therapy (ExC A), EGFR ex20ins post-chemo (ExC D) and PD on 1L osimertinib (ExC E). mPFS in the EGFR ex20ins cohort was within the range of current EGFR Exon 20 ins agents in development. EGFR monoclonal antibodies with osimertinib warrant further study in settings of de novo and acquired EGFR dependent resistance to EGFR-TKI. Clinical trial information: NCT02496663. [Table: see text]

9007 Background: EGFR ins20-mutant NSCLC has historically been challenging to treat. While new agents targeting EGFR ins20 have recently been approved, adverse events (AEs), particularly wild type (WT) EGFR-related AEs are common. CLN-081 is a novel EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with broad activity against EGFR mutations, including ins20, and increased selectivity for ins20 versus WT EGFR. CLN-081 has been granted FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of pts with EGFR ins20 NSCLC. We present updated results of the initial multicenter Ph1/2a study of CLN-081 in pts with advanced, EGFR ins20-mutant NSCLC, including 39 pts treated in an expanded cohort at the dose of 100 mg twice daily (BID). Methods: Ph1 dose escalation utilized an accelerated titration (AT) and rolling six design. Individual cohorts were expanded in Phase 1 and 2a based on prespecified protocol criteria. Pts were required to have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Stable, treated brain metastasis (mets) were allowed. CLN-081 is dosed in 21-day cycles. Results: As of 13 December 2021, 73 pts [median age: 65 (36-82), median lines of prior therapy: 2 (1-9), 28 (39%) with a history of brain mets] received CLN-081 at 30 mg (8), 45 mg (1), 65 mg (14), 100 mg (39), and 150 mg (11), all BID. Treatment-related AEs in ≥ 15% of pts were rash (74%), diarrhea (27%), paronychia (25%), fatigue (19%), anemia (18%), dry skin (18%), nausea (16%). Treatment-related Gr ≥ 3 AEs in ≥ 4 % of pts included anemia (10%), increased ALT (4%), and increased AST (4%). Gr 3 rash and Gr 3 diarrhea were observed in 1 and 2 pts, respectively, at 150 mg BID, while no pts treated at ≤ 100 mg BID experienced Gr 3 rash or diarrhea. Treatment-related dose reductions and discontinuations across all dose levels occurred in 10 pts (14%) and 5 pts (7%) respectively. Among 70 response-evaluable pts across all dose levels, 25 (36%) had a confirmed partial response (PR), 34 (49%) had stable disease (SD), and 3 (4%) had progressive disease as a best response. Seven pts (10%) had a PR that remained unconfirmed; 1 (1%) pt was pending a confirmatory scan. Of 36 response-evaluable pts at 100 mg BID, 14 (39%) had a confirmed PR, 17 (47%) had SD, and 1 (3%) had PD. Three pts had a PR that remained unconfirmed (8%); 1 (3%) pt was pending a confirmatory scan. Notably, among Ph1 pts treated at 100 mg BID (N = 13) in whom longer follow-up is available, the mDOR and mPFS (estimated by Kaplan-Meier) was > 15 months and 12 months, respectively. Disease control (SD ≥ 6 months or any PR) was observed in 12/13 pts (92%). Updated data with additional follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: In pts with heavily-pretreated advanced EGFR ins20 NSCLC, CLN-081 has a manageable safety profile, with anti-tumor activity across the range of doses tested. Further, CLN-081 has demonstrated a favorable clinical profile at the dose of 100 mg BID, with an encouraging objective response rate, response durability, and no Gr 3 rash or diarrhea. Clinical trial information: NCT04036682.

9017 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC without EGFR-activating mutations ( EGFRm) have limited treatment options after failure of molecularly targeted therapies or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) with or without immunotherapy (IO). HER3-DXd is an antibody drug conjugate consisting of a fully human monoclonal antibody to HER3 attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. We previously published efficacy and safety data from a study of HER3-DXd in EGFRm NSCLC after failure of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Here we present results in pts without EGFRm who progressed after PBC ± IO treatment. Methods: This ongoing phase 1 dose expansion study included a cohort of pts with advanced NSCLC without EGFRm who received prior PBC ± IO (NCT03260491). Pts with stable brain metastases were eligible, as were pts with non- EGFR oncogenic alterations and prior targeted therapy. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included DOR, PFS, and safety. Results: At the Mar 26, 2021, data cutoff, 47 pts had been treated with HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg IV every 3 wk; 17 pts had an identified driver genomic alteration (4 KRAS and 1 NRAS mutations, 4 EGFR Ex20ins, 3 ROS1 and 2 ALK fusions, and 3 other). Median age was 62 y (range, 29-79 y); 53% of pts were female; 17% had squamous NSCLC. Median follow-up was 9.5 mo (range, 3.7-19.1 mo). Median number of prior anticancer regimens in the advanced setting was 3 (range, 0-8). Median treatment duration on study was 4.1 mo (range, 0.7-13.6 mo); treatment was ongoing in 11 pts (23%) at data cutoff. Confirmed ORR by BICR was 28% (13/47 pts; 95% CI, 16%-43%; 13 PRs, 22 SD). Median DOR was 5.7 mo (95% CI, 3.7-10.7 mo) and median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% CI, 3.9-12.7 mo). Among pts with identified driver genomic alterations, 35% (6/17) had a confirmed response by BICR, including 3 of 5 pts with KRAS/NRAS mutations and 2 of 2 with ALK fusions. Among pts without identified driver genomic alterations, 23% (7/30) had a confirmed response by BICR. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and fatigue (15%). Drug-related interstitial lung disease by central adjudication occurred in 4 pts (9%; 0 grade ≥3). Four pts (9%) had TEAEs associated with treatment discontinuation. No drug-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: These data show promising clinical activity in pts with NSCLC without EGFRm, including pts with other identified driver genomic alterations. Updated results from this study will be presented. The overall safety profile was similar to that previously reported in pts with EGFRm NSCLC. A phase 2 study of HER3-DXd in pts with EGFRm NSCLC after failure of EGFR TKI and PBC is ongoing (NCT04619004). Clinical trial information: NCT03260491.

Background The usefulness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in detecting mutations and monitoring treatment response has not been well studied beyond a few actionable biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Research Question How does the usefulness of ctDNA analysis compare with that of solid tumor biopsy analysis in patients with NSCLC? Methods We retrospectively evaluated 370 adult patients with NSCLC treated at the City of Hope between November 2015 and August 2019 to assess the usefulness of ctDNA in mutation identification, survival, concordance with matched tissue samples in 32 genes, and tumor evolution. Results A total of 1,688 somatic mutations were detected in 473 ctDNA samples from 370 patients with NSCLC. Of the 473 samples, 177 showed at least one actionable mutation with currently available Food and Drug Administration-approved NSCLC therapies. MET and CDK6 amplifications co-occurred with BRAF amplifications (false discovery rate [FDR], < 0.01), and gene-level mutations were mutually exclusive in KRAS and EGFR (FDR, 0.0009). Low cumulative percent ctDNA levels were associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.85; P = .006). Overall survival was shorter in patients harboring BRAF mutations (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.24-4.6; P = .009), PIK3CA mutations (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.56-4.9; P < .001) and KRAS mutations (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.30-4.1; P = .004). Gene-level concordance was 93.8%, whereas the positive concordance rate was 41.6%. More mutations in targetable genes were found in ctDNA than in tissue biopsy samples. Treatment response and tumor evolution over time were detected in repeated ctDNA samples. Interpretation Although ctDNA analysis exhibited similar usefulness to tissue biopsy analysis, more mutations in targetable genes were missed in tissue biopsy analyses. Therefore, the evaluation of ctDNA in conjunction with tissue biopsy samples may help to detect additional targetable mutations to improve clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC.

Background Symptoms are common among patients enrolled in phase I trials. We assessed the validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items in relation to previously validated assessments of quality of life and psychological distress. We used data from a randomized trial testing a palliative care support intervention for patients enrolled on phase I trials. Methods Patients (n = 479) were accrued to the parent study prior to initiating a phase I clinical trial with data collected at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks. We determined the correlation of PRO-CTCAE with distress level, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) total, and subscale domain scores. Results Patients were predominantly female (56.8%) and older than age 60 years, and 30.7% were from minority populations. The correlation coefficient for distress level for all PRO-CTCAE items was small to moderate (Pearson r = 0.33-0.46). Pearson correlation coefficient for FACT-G total was moderate (r = -0.45 to -0.69). Stronger associations were noted for mood items of the PRO-CTCAE only (with distress level, r = 0.55-0.6; with FACT-G, r = -0.54 to -0.6). PRO-CTCAE symptom interference scores had the strongest correlation with distress level (Pearson r = 0.46) and FACT-G total (Pearson r = -0.69). Correlations between PRO-CTCAE items and corresponding FACT-G (total and subscales) and distress levels reached statistical significance for all items (P Conclusion Evidence demonstrates validity of PRO-CTCAE in a heterogeneous US sample of patients undergoing cancer treatment on phase I trials, with small to moderate correlations with distress level for all PRO-CTCAE items and moderate correlations with quality of life as measured by FACT-G total.

PURPOSE: Omic-informed therapy is being used more frequently for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being treated on the basis of evidence-based decision-making. However, there is a lack of a standardized framework to evaluate those decisions and understand the association between omics-based management strategies and survival among patients. Therefore, we compared outcomes between patients with lung adenocarcinoma who received omics-driven targeted therapy versus patients who received standard therapeutic options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with advanced NSCLC adenocarcinoma (N = 798) at City of Hope who received genomic sequencing at the behest of their treating oncologists. A thoracic oncology registry was used as a clinicogenomic database to track patient outcomes. RESULTS: Of 798 individuals with advanced NSCLC (median age, 65 years [range, 22-99 years]; 60% white; 50% with a history of smoking), 662 patients (83%) had molecular testing and 439 (55%) received targeted therapy on the basis of the omic-data. A fast-and-frugal decision tree (FFT) model was developed to evaluate the impact of omics-based strategy on decision-making, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We calculated that the overall positive predictive value of the entire FFT strategy for predicting decisions regarding the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor–based targeted therapy was 88% and the negative predictive value was 96%. In an adjusted Cox regression analysis, there was a significant correlation with survival benefit with the FFT omics-driven therapeutic strategy for both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.74; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.71; P < .001) as compared with standard therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced NSCLC who received care in the academic oncology setting, omics-driven therapy decisions directly informed treatment in patients and was correlated with better OS and PFS.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the landscape of lung cancer therapy. However significant proportions of patients have primary or acquired resistance to ICIs. Molecular characterization is critical for patient selection and overcoming resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to investigate the molecular characteristics associated with ICIs outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All advanced stage NSCLC patients at City of Hope who received ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab) were identified retrospectively. Overall survival (OS, from the start of the ICIs), Pathology and information on genomic alterations (GAs) including next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels were collected. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test, Log-rank test were used for comparison of demographics, and survival curves respectively. Univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: 346 NSCLC patients were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis found the association of OS with PD-L1 level ≥50% (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.59; P

Introduction JUNIPER compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, with erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation. Methods JUNIPER was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of abemaciclib versus erlotinib in patients with stage IV NSCLC and a detectable mutation in codons 12 or 13 of the KRAS oncogene, who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 additional therapy (could include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy). Randomized patients (3:2) received either 200 mg abemaciclib twice daily or 150 mg erlotinib once daily with best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results Between December 2014 and April 2017, 453 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib (N = 270) or erlotinib (N = 183). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 8.8) with abemaciclib and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5) with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968 [95% CI: 0.768, 1.219]; p = .77). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.8) with abemaciclib and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9, 2.0) with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p, Eli Lilly and CompanyEli Lilly, This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.

509 Background: Patient values toward treatment goals and competing health outcomes among adults with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are not well understood. The goal of this study was to identify NET patient values towards treatment goals and health outcomes. Methods: Patients with well-differentiated, grade 1/2, advanced NETs starting a new systemic therapy were recruited at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. Patients completed four tools: 1) Health Outcomes Tool: ranks importance of four outcomes (survival, function, freedom from pain, freedom from symptoms); 2) Attitude Scale: identifies the extent to which patients agree with statements related to health outcomes; 3) Now versus Later Tool: ranks relative importance of quality of life (QOL) now, one year from now, and five years from now; and 4) Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire: identifies the amount of information patients prefer to receive about their disease and treatment, patient’s goal of treatment, physician’s goal of treatment (patient’s perception), and self-reported health status. Results: Sixty patients (50.0% ≥65 years) completed the questionnaires. Ninety-seven percent had stage IV disease. Primary tumor locations included gastrointestinal tract (41.7%), pancreas (30.0%), and lung (21.7%). Sixty percent of patients had received at least one prior systemic therapy. Only 30.0% of patients chose survival as their most important treatment outcome on the Health Outcomes Tool. The remaining 70.0% chose maintaining independence (46.7%), freedom from pain (11.7%), and freedom from symptoms (11.7%) as their most important health outcome. Similarly, on the Attitude Scale, 66.7% of patients agreed with: “I would rather live a shorter life than lose my ability to take care of myself”; 85.0% agreed with: “It is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible.” Ninety-three percent of patients agreed with: “I am willing to have side effects right now if it means I could have a better quality of life in the future.” Moreover, on the Now versus Later Tool, 48.3% of patients considered QOL one year in the future more important than their current QOL; 40.0% considered QOL five years in the future more important than their current QOL. On the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, only 30.0% of patients chose “To extend my life as long as possible” as their primary treatment goal, but 40.0% believed survival was their oncologist’s primary treatment goal. Furthermore, only 51.7% of patients believed they had the same treatment goal as their oncologist. Across all questionnaires, there were no significant differences between the responses of younger and older patients. Conclusions: NET patients value independence more than survival. More communication between NET patients and physicians is needed to ensure patient preferences and values are incorporated into treatment plans.

© 2018 Elsevier Inc. We evaluated the multitargeted Janus kinase/TRAF family member associated NF-κβ activator (TANK)-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) inhibitor momelotinib combined with trametinib in 21 patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of momelotinib was 150 mg twice daily (insufficient to achieve significant TBK1 inhibition). No patients achieved objective response and the combination did not improve on the activity of single-agent trametinib on the basis of historic data. Introduction: Specific treatment options are lacking for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) despite treatment advances in other mutation-driven subgroups. Patients and Methods: In this study we evaluated the multitargeted Janus kinase/TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) inhibitor momelotinib combined with the mitogen/extracellular signal-related kinase (MEK)1/MEK2 inhibitor trametinib in patients with platinum-treated, refractory, metastatic, KRAS-mutated NSCLC. Dose escalations (3 + 3 design) were conducted with momelotinib in combination with trametinib 1.0 mg once daily, then with trametinib in combination with the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of momelotinib. MTD was determined from dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during patients' first 28-day cycle. Safety was the primary end point, and efficacy parameters, including disease control rate (DCR) at 8 weeks, were secondary end points. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled (median age: 68 years; 14 [66.7%] female). The MTD was momelotinib 150 mg twice daily in combination with trametinib 1.0 mg once daily. DLTs that determined the MTD were increased alanine aminotransferase and fatigue. The most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (n = 14 [66.7%]), diarrhea (n = 11 [52.4%]), and fatigue (n = 11 [52.4%]). The most common Grade ≥3 event was hypoxia (n = 3 [14.3%]). No patients achieved objective response. DCR at 8 weeks was 12 patients (57.1%) (90% confidence interval [CI], 37.2%-75.5%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 3.6 months (90% CI, 2.2-5.6 months) and 7.4 months (90% CI, 4.0-15.3 months), respectively. Maximum momelotinib plasma concentrations were reached 1 to 2 hours after dosing, but were insufficient to achieve significant TBK1 inhibition. Conclusion: The additional use of momelotinib with trametinib does not improve on the activity of single-agent trametinib in KRAS-mutated NSCLC on the basis of historic data.

The NCCN Guidelines for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) address all aspects of disease management. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for SCLC regarding immunotherapy, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy. For the 2018 update, new sections were added on "Signs and Symptoms of SCLC" and "Principles of Pathologic Review."

RMC-4630 is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable allosteric inhibitor of SHP2, a central node in the RAS signaling pathway. Preclinical data have demonstrated that RMC-4630 can shrink tumors carrying certain mutations in the RAS pathway such as KRASG12C, NF1LOF, and BRAFClass3. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was isolated from blood using GuardantOMNI in 80 patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors in the phase 1 dose-escalation trial of RMC-4630 (NCT03634982) to characterize and confirm RAS pathway mutations and to evaluate molecular responses in patients receiving RMC-4630 monotherapy. Safety, PK and efficacy findings from this study are reported in a separate abstract. 78 of 80 patients had baseline somatic mutations detected in plasma, of which 60 were either KRASG12X, NF1LOF, or BRAFClass3; 48 of these 60 patients also had on-treatment ctDNA assessments and these patients constitute the population reported here. 9 of 48 patients (19%) had KRASG12C detected at baseline, available scan results and a ctDNA sample after 4 weeks of receiving RMC-4630. A decrease in KRASG12C variant allele frequency (VAF) was detected in 5/9 patients (56%) with clearance in 1 patient with a partial response. Decrease in KRASG12C VAF was associated with change in tumor volume (PCC=0.85, p=0.008), preceding scan results by approximately 1 month, suggesting that change in KRASG12C VAF may be an early measure of drug activity or possibly response. 5 of 48 patients (10%) had NF1LOF detected at baseline. A decrease, or stability in NF1LOF VAF on treatment compared to baseline was detected in 4 (80% of all NF1LOF patients). The decrease in NF1LOF VAF was not associated with change in tumor volume and may represent effects of RMC-4630 on a subclone harboring NF1LOF. One patient had a detectable BRAFClass3 mutation at baseline, which decreased in VAF on treatment compared to baseline. Of the remaining patients there were 12 KRASG12D, 9 KRASG12V and other KRASG12X. The majority progressed with an increase in VAF of all mutations including KRASG12X, suggesting that the KRASG12X-containing clone is responsible for escape from single agent RMC-4630. In most instances the increase in KRASG12X VAF in blood preceded determination of clinical progression. Longitudinal assessment of ctDNA indicates that some patients with RAS-addicted tumors undergo a molecular response on treatment with the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4630. Citation Format: Josie L. Hayes, Marianna Koczywas, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Pasi A. Janne, Jose M. Pacheco, Susanna Ulahannan, Judy S. Wang, Howard A. Burris, Jonathan W. Riess, Caroline McCoach, Michael S. Gordon, Anna Capasso, Ariel Chen, Richa Dua, Bojena Bitman, Martha Guerra, Hongfang Wang, Xiaolin Wang, Eric Haura. Confirmation of target inhibition and anti-tumor activity of the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4630 via longitudinal analysis of ctDNA in a phase 1 clinical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB054.