Search

INTRODUCTION Preoperative jaundice is considered a relative contraindication to radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) resection due to poor prognosis and high postoperative morbidity. Recent reports have indicated that aggressive surgery may improve long-term survival for patients with advanced GBC who present with obstructive jaundice. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among jaundiced and non-jaundiced patients with resectable GBC. METHODS An electronic search was performed using several Medical Subject Headings terms: cholecyst, gallbladder, tumor, cancer, carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, neoplasia, neoplasm, jaundice, and icterus. Overall survival after surgery was the primary outcome; resectability and postoperative morbidity were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Overall survival was shorter among patients who presented with jaundice (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.97; P

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies and is associated with a very poor overall survival. However, it seems that the only curative option remains an aggressive surgical approach capable of obtaining a radical resection. Unfortunately, this desiderate is even harder to be obtained when it comes to pancreatic tumors with vascular invasion.We present the case of a 65-year-old patient who was diagnosed with a cephalopancreatic tumor invading both the portal vein and the superior mesenteric artery.Whipple procedure was performed with portal and superior mesenteric artery resection; the continuity of the portal vein was established by an end-to-end anastomosis, while the superior mesenteric artery was re-implanted in the infra-renal aorta.Due to improvements of surgical techniques and postoperative management, the postoperative morbidity and early mortality significantly decreased and enabled the surgeon to perform ultra-radical surgery with better outcome.