Search

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tuberculosis (TB) drugs currently focuses on peak plasma concentrations, yet total exposure [area under the 24-h concentration-time curve (AUC₀₋₂₄)] is probably most relevant to the efficacy of these drugs. We therefore assessed population AUC₀₋₂₄ data for all four first-line TB drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) as well as moxifloxacin and developed limited sampling strategies to estimate AUC₀₋₂₄ values conveniently. AUC₀₋₂₄ and other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined following intensive PK sampling in two Dutch TB referral centres. Best subset selection multiple linear regression was performed to derive limited sampling equations. Median percentage prediction error and median absolute percentage prediction error were calculated via jackknife analysis to evaluate bias and imprecision of the predictions. Geometric mean AUC₀₋₂₄ values for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin were 41.1, 15.2, 380, 25.5 and 33.6 hmg/L, respectively. Limited sampling at various fixed sampling points enabled an accurate and precise prediction of AUC₀₋₂₄ values of all drugs separately and simultaneously. In the absence of clinically validated target values for AUC₀₋₂₄, average AUC₀₋₂₄ values can be used as reference values in TDM. Limited sampling of AUC₀₋₂₄ is feasible in many settings and allows for TDM to be performed at a larger scale., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

Altered pharmacokinetics of antituberculosis drugs may contribute to an increased risk of tuberculosis treatment failure for diabetic patients. We previously found that rifampin exposure was 2-fold lower in diabetic than in nondiabetic tuberculosis patients during the continuation phase of treatment. We now examined the influence of diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of antituberculosis drugs in the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment, and we evaluated the effect of glycemic control. For this purpose, 18 diabetic and 18 gender- and body weight-matched nondiabetic tuberculosis patients were included in an Indonesian setting. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol at steady state. The bioavailability of rifampin was determined by comparing rifampin exposure after oral versus intravenous administration. Pharmacokinetic assessments were repeated for 10 diabetic tuberculosis patients after glycemic control. No differences in the areas under the concentration-time curves of the drugs in plasma from 0 to 24 h postdose (AUC(0-24)), the maximum concentrations of the drugs in plasma (C(max)), the times to C(max) (T(max)), and the half-lives of rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were found between diabetic and nondiabetic tuberculosis patients in the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment. For rifampin, oral bioavailability and metabolism were similar in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The pharmacokinetic parameters of antituberculosis drugs were not correlated with blood glucose levels or glucose control. We conclude that diabetes does not alter the pharmacokinetics of antituberculosis drugs during the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment. The reduced exposure to rifampin of diabetic patients in the continuation phase may be due to increased body weight and possible differences in hepatic induction. Further research is needed to determine the cause of increased tuberculosis treatment failure among diabetic patients.

Thirty-four patients treated concomitantly with lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin were evaluated. Overall, only 15% used the recommended increased dose of lopinavir/ritonavir. Of patients on a nonadjusted dose of lopinavir/ritonavir, 67% had a subtherapeutic lopinavir plasma concentration and 38% had a detectable viral load. Forty percent of patients on an increased dose of lopinavir/ritonavir prematurely stopped the drug combination because of adverse events. Combined use of lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin is challenging as it implies balancing between suboptimal efficacy and toxicity.

Objective: Previous research in healthy volunteers has demonstrated that rifampicin and adjusted doses of lopinavir/ritonavir soft-gel capsules resulted in adequate exposure to lopinavir. Our objective was to study the combined use of rifampicin and the newly introduced lopinavir/ritonavir tablets., Methods: A total of 40 healthy volunteers were planned to start with 600 mg rifampicin once daily from days 1-5. From days 6-15, volunteers were randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir tablets dosed as either 600/150 or 800/200 mg twice daily, both in addition to 600 mg rifampicin once daily. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was planned on day 15. Safety assessments were conducted regularly throughout the study period., Results: Eleven volunteers started as the first group in this study. No major complaints occurred during day 1-5 (rifampicin only). After addition of lopinavir/ritonavir, eight volunteers suffered from both nausea and vomiting, one from nausea only, and one from vomiting only. On day 7, increases in aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) levels were reported in all volunteers and on day 8, the study was prematurely terminated. The AST/ALT levels continued to rise and peaked (grade 2, n = 2; grade 3, n = 1; grade 4, n = 8) on days 9-10. All values returned to normal within 6 weeks., Conclusions: The study showed a high incidence of adverse events when a higher than standard dose of the new lopinavir/ritonavir tablets was combined with rifampicin. In the future, this drug combination should not be given to healthy volunteers. Liver function should be carefully monitored when rifampicin and lopinavir/ritonavir are combined in patients.

Background: The long duration of the current tuberculosis (TB) treatment is demanding and warrants the development of new drugs. Moxifloxacin shows promising results and may be combined with rifampicin to shorten the duration of TB treatment. Rifampicin induces the phase II metabolic enzymes that are involved in the biotransformation of moxifloxacin. Therefore, the interaction between rifampicin and moxifloxacin should be investigated., Patients and Methods: Nineteen Indonesian patients with pulmonary TB who were in the last month of their TB treatment completed a 1-arm, 2-period, fixed-order pharmacokinetic study. In phase 1 of the study, they received 400 mg of moxifloxacin every day for 5 days in addition to 450 mg of rifampicin and 600 mg of isoniazid 3 times per week. In phase 2 of the study, after a 1-month washout period, patients received moxifloxacin for another 5 days (without rifampicin and isoniazid). A 24-h pharmacokinetic curve for moxifloxacin was recorded on the last day of both study periods, and its pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated for an interaction with rifampicin, using a bioequivalence approach., Results: Coadministration of moxifloxacin with rifampicin and isoniazid resulted in an almost uniform decrease in moxifloxacin exposure (in 18 of 19 patients). The geometric means for the ratio of phase 1 area under the curve to phase 2 area under the curve and for the ratio of phase 1 peak plasma concentration to phase 2 peak plasma concentration were 0.69 (90% confidence interval, 0.65-0.74) and 0.68 (90% confidence interval, 0.64-0.73), respectively. The median time to reach peak plasma concentration for moxifloxacin was prolonged from 1 h to 2.5 h when combined with rifampicin and isoniazid (P=.003)., Conclusions: Coadministration of moxifloxacin with intermittently administered rifampicin and isoniazid results in reduced moxifloxacin plasma concentrations, which is most likely the result of induced glucuronidation or sulphation by rifampicin. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of the interaction on the outcome of TB treatment.

Rifampin is a key drug for tuberculosis (TB) treatment. The available data suggest that the currently applied 10-mg/kg of body weight dose of rifampin may be too low and that increasing the dose may shorten the treatment duration. A double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial was performed to investigate the effect of a higher dose of rifampin in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability. Fifty newly diagnosed adult Indonesian TB patients were randomized to receive a standard (450-mg, i.e., 10-mg/kg in Indonesian patients) or higher (600-mg) dose of rifampin in addition to other TB drugs. A full pharmacokinetic curve for rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol was recorded after 6 weeks of daily TB treatment. Tolerability was assessed during the 6-month treatment period. The geometric means of exposure to rifampin (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)]) were increased by 65% (P < 0.001) in the higher-dose group (79.7 mg.h/liter) compared to the standard-dose group (48.5 mg.h/liter). Maximum rifampin concentrations (C(max)) were 15.6 mg/liter versus 10.5 mg/liter (49% increase; P < 0.001). The percentage of patients for whom the rifampin C(max) was > or =8 mg/liter was 96% versus 79% (P = 0.094). The pharmacokinetics of pyrazinamide and ethambutol were similar in both groups. Mild (grade 1 or 2) hepatotoxicity was more common in the higher-dose group (46 versus 20%; P = 0.054), but no patient developed severe hepatotoxicity. Increasing the rifampin dose was associated with a more than dose-proportional increase in the mean AUC(0-24) and C(max) of rifampin without affecting the incidence of serious adverse effects. Follow-up studies are warranted to assess whether high-dose rifampin may enable shortening of TB treatment.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (DM) is a strong risk factor for tuberculosis (TB) and is associated with a slower response to TB treatment and a higher mortality rate. Because lower concentrations of anti-TB drugs may be a contributing factor, we compared the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in patients with TB, with and without DM., Methods: Seventeen adult Indonesian patients with TB and DM and 17 age- and sex-matched patients with TB and without DM were included in the study during the continuation phase of TB treatment. All patients received 450 mg of rifampicin (10 mg/kg) and 600 mg of isoniazid 3 times weekly. Steady-state plasma concentrations of rifampicin and its metabolite desacetylrifampicin were assessed at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after drug intake., Results: Geometric means of rifampicin exposure (AUC(0-6 h)) were 12.3 mg x h/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-24.2) in patients with TB and DM, and 25.9 mg x h/L (95% CI, 21.4-40.2) in patients with TB only (P=.003). Similar differences were found for the maximum concentration of rifampicin. No significant differences in time to maximum concentration of rifampicin were observed. The AUC(0-6 h) of desacetylrifampicin was also much lower in patients with TB and DM versus patients with TB only (geometric mean, 0.60 vs. 3.2 mg x h/L; P=.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that higher body weight (P<.001), the presence of DM (P=.06), and plasma glucose concentration (P=.016) were correlated with exposure to rifampicin., Conclusion: Exposure (AUC(0-6 h)) to rifampicin was 53% lower in Indonesian patients with TB and DM, compared with patients with TB only. Patients with TB and DM who have a higher body weight may need a higher dose of rifampicin.