Search

The main objective of the French GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER randomized phase III study was to assess the efficacy of dd-MVAC and GC in term of progression-free survival in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after surgery.A total of 500 patients have been randomized in 28 reference centers. Inclusion criteria were urothelial carcinoma without neuro-endocrine variant, disease defined by a T2, T3 or T4a N0 (pelvic lymph node ≤ 10 mm on CT scan) M0 staging for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or pT3 or pT4 or pN+ and M0 for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety, response rate. The peri-operative chemotherapy schedule was experimental arm dd-MVAC for a total of 6 cycles versus standard arm GC 4 cycles. The toxicity was evaluated according to NCI CTCAE (v 4.0). The progression-free survival rate will be estimated at 3 years by the Kaplan-Meier method. All the patients will be followed for 5 years.The last patient was randomized in March 2018 and the primary endpoint results are expected for mid-2021. As the dd-MVAC schedule is associated with higher response rates in metastatic disease, the real question today is to confirm such benefit in the peri-operative setting, taking also in consideration the chemotherapy toxicity. Tomorrow, the challenge may be the best chemotherapy and immunotherapy association, the authors hope that final Vesper Trial results will help to determine the gold standard chemotherapy. Keywords: Bladder cancer, Peri-operative chemotherapy

Purpose: The three-arm, phase III KEYNOTE-361 study did not meet its dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. This prespecified exploratory analysis assessed the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) with clinical outcomes., Patients and Methods: TMB and PD-L1 CPS were determined via whole-exome sequencing and PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, respectively. The association was evaluated in each treatment arm using logistic regression [objective response rate (ORR)] and Cox proportional hazards regression models (PFS and OS); one-sided (pembrolizumab monotherapy; pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) and two-sided (chemotherapy) nominal P values were calculated. Significance was prespecified at α = 0.05 without multiplicity adjustment. Efficacy was evaluated by prespecified cutoffs of 175 mutations/exome (TMB) and CPS 10 (PD-L1)., Results: Of the 993 treated patients, 820 (82.6%) and 993 (100%) had evaluable TMB and CPS data, respectively. Continuous TMB was positively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembrolizumab monotherapy (one-sided P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.007, respectively); PFS and OS for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.007 and P = 0.010, respectively); and OS for chemotherapy alone (two-sided P = 0.040). Continuous PD-L1 CPS showed evidence of anticipated association with ORR and PFS for pembrolizumab monotherapy. The subgroup with TMB ≥175 mutations/exome and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 had the highest PFS and OS improvements with pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone., Conclusions: These data suggest that TMB may be predictive of the response to pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background and Objective: The CABASTY study showed that more frequent administration of a lower dose of cabazitaxel (CBZ) reduced toxicity in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), without compromising efficacy. Here, we investigated the impact of a biweekly CBZ schedule on patient-reported pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Methods: We randomized 196 patients from 25 centers (1:1, stratified by age and G8 score) to the biweekly CBZ16 (CBZ 16 mg/m 2 ) experimental arm or the triweekly CBZ25 (CBZ 25 mg/m 2 ) control arm (CABASTY study, NCT02961257). We assessed pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire., Key Findings and Limitations: A total of 141 patients were available for a pain and 160 for an HRQoL analysis. Median time to pain progression (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-4.22, p = 0.3) and median time to first opiate use (stratified HR: 1.05, CI: 0.44-2.55, p = 0.9) did not differ between arms. We did not see a significant difference in median time to deterioration of FACT-P total score between treatments (stratified HR: 0.88, CI: 0.47-1.7, p = 0.7). Interestingly, the time to onset of several adverse events was significantly longer in the biweekly CBZ16 group., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: HRQoL did not significantly differ between the biweekly CBZ16 and the standard schedule. Additionally, onset of some adverse events was delayed. These results may increase health care providers' confidence in using CBZ in older patients with mCRPC who are denied chemotherapy., Patient Summary: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are often preferred to taxane chemotherapy as a treatment of second or subsequent line in older metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients due to more frequent treatment-related toxicities. Here, we showed that quality of life and pain did not differ significantly with an adapted schedule of cabazitaxel (CBZ), compared with the standard regimen. This CBZ schedule could increase eligibility of older patients for chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Trough abiraterone concentration (ABI C min ) of 8.4 ng/mL has been identified as an appropriate efficacy threshold in patients treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the phase II OPTIMABI study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dose escalation of abiraterone acetate (AA) in underexposed patients with mCRPC with early tumour progression., Methods: This multicentre, non-randomised study consisted of two sequential steps. In step 1, all patients started treatment with 1000 mg of AA once daily. Abiraterone C min was measured 22-26 h after the last dose intake each month during the first 12 weeks of treatment. In step 2, underexposed patients (C min < 8.4 ng/mL) with tumour progression within the first 6 months of treatment were enrolled and received AA 1000 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-progression at 12 weeks after the dose doubling. During step 1, adherence to ABI treatment was assessed using the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. A post-hoc analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) data was conducted using Bayesian estimation of C min from samples collected outside the sampling guidelines (22-26 h)., Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 81 patients were included in step 1. In all, 21 (26%) patients were underexposed in step 1, and 8 of them (38%) experienced tumour progression within the first 6 months. A total of 71 patients (88%) completed the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. Of the patients, 62% had a score of 0, and 38% had a score of 1 or 2 (minimal compliance failure), without a significant difference in mean ABI C min in the two groups. Four patients were enrolled in step 2, and all reached the exposure target (C min > 8.4 ng/mL) after doubling the dose, but none met the primary endpoint. In the post-hoc analysis of PK data, 32 patients (39%) were underexposed, and ABI C min was independently associated with worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-5.81; p = 0.03], in contrast to the ITT analysis., Conclusion: The ITT and per-protocol analyses showed no statistical association between ABI underexposure and an increased risk of early tumour progression in patients with mCRPC, while the Bayesian estimator showed an association. However, other strategies than dose escalation at the time of progression need to be evaluated. Treatment adherence appeared to be uniformly good in the present study. Finally, the use of a Bayesian approach to recover samples collected outside the predefined blood collection time window could benefit the conduct of clinical trials based on drug monitoring. OPTIMABI trial is registered as National Clinical Trial number NCT03458247, with the EudraCT number 2017-000560-15)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Reducing nivolumab dose intensity could increase patients' life quality and decrease the financial burden while maintaining efficacy. The aims of this study were to develop a population PK model of nivolumab based on data from unselected metastatic cancer patients and to simulate extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain minimal effective plasma concentrations (MEPC)., Methods: Concentration-time data (992 plasma nivolumab concentrations, 364 patients) were modeled using a two-compartment model with linear elimination clearance in Monolix software. Extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain steady-state trough concentrations (C min,ss ) above the MEPC of 2.5 mg/L or 1.5 mg/L in >90% of patients were simulated., Results: Increasing 3-times the dosing interval from 240 mg every two weeks (Q2W) to Q6W and 2-times from 480 mg Q4W to Q8W resulted in C min,ss above 2.5 mg/L in 95.8% and 95.4% of patients, respectively. 240 mg Q8W and 480 mg Q10W resulted in C min,ss above 1.5 mg/L in 91.0% and 91.8% of patients, respectively. Selection of a 240 mg Q6W regimen would decrease by 3-fold the annual treatment costs compared to standard regimen of 240 mg Q2W (from 78,744€ to 26,248€ in France)., Conclusions: Clinical trials are warranted to confirm the non-inferiority of extended-interval compared to standard regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability may influence the clinical benefit or toxicity of cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to investigate the exposure-toxicity and exposure-response relationship of cabozantinib in unselected mRCC patients treated in routine care., Methods: This ambispective multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients receiving cabozantinib in monotherapy. Steady-state trough concentration (Cmin,ss) within the first 3 months after treatment initiation was used for the PK/PD analysis with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and survival outcomes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify the risk factors of DLT and inefficacy in patients, respectively., Results: Seventy-eight mRCC patients were eligible for the statistical analysis. Fifty-two patients (67%) experienced DLT with a median onset of 2.1 months (95%CI 0.7-8.2). In multivariate analysis, Cmin,ss was identified as an independent risk factor of DLT (OR 1.46, 95%CI [1.04-2.04]; p = 0.029). PFS and OS were not statistically associated with the starting dose (p = 0.81 and p = 0.98, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of PFS, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.28 (95%CI, 0.10-0.77, p = 0.014). By contrast, Cmin, ss > 336 ng/mL was not statistically associated with longer OS., Conclusion: Early plasma drug monitoring may be useful to optimise cabozantinib treatment in mRCC patients treated in monotherapy, especially in frail patients starting at a lower than standard dose., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Importance: Many patients 65 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are denied taxane chemotherapy because this treatment is considered unsuitable., Objective: To determine whether biweekly cabazitaxel (CBZ), 16 mg/m2 (biweekly CBZ16), plus prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at each cycle reduces the risk of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications (eg, febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection, or sepsis) compared with triweekly CBZ, 25 mg/m2 (triweekly CBZ25), plus G-CSF (standard regimen)., Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 196 patients 65 years or older with progressive mCRPC were enrolled in this prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted in France (18 centers) and Germany (7 centers) between May 5, 2017, and January 7, 2021. All patients had received docetaxel and at least 1 novel androgen receptor-targeted agent., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (experimental group) or triweekly CBZ25 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (control group)., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia measured at nadir and/or neutropenic complications., Results: Among 196 patients (97 in the triweekly CBZ25 group and 99 in the biweekly CBZ16 group), the median (IQR) age was 74.6 (70.4-79.3) years, and 181 (92.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 31.3 (22.5-37.5) months. Relative dose intensities were comparable between groups (median [IQR], 92.7% [83.7%-98.9%] in the triweekly CBZ25 group vs 92.8% [87.0%-98.9%] in the biweekly CBZ16 group). The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications was significantly higher with triweekly CBZ25 vs biweekly CBZ16 (60 of 96 [62.5%] vs 5 of 98 [5.1%]; odds ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08; P < .001). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common with triweekly CBZ25 (70 of 96 [72.9%]) vs biweekly CBZ16 (55 of 98 [56.1%]). One patient (triweekly CBZ25 group) died of a neutropenic complication., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, compared with the standard regimen, biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF significantly reduced by 12-fold the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications, with comparable clinical outcomes. The findings suggest that biweekly CBZ16 regimen should be offered to patients 65 years or older with mCRPC for whom the standard regimen is unsuitable., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02961257.

Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are cornerstones of the redifferentiation strategy in metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI)-resistant mutant thyroid cancers. We explored the exposure-toxicity relationship for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) onset in patients treated with dabrafenib and/or trametinib and investigated whether plasma exposure was associated with RAI reuptake. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients treated in our institution with a tumor redifferentiation strategy, for whom plasma concentration of dabrafenib, its active metabolite hydroxy-dabrafenib, and trametinib was measured. Trough concentrations (C minpred ) and total plasma drug exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of dabrafenib (AUC DAB ), hydroxy-dabrafenib (AUC OHD ), and trametinib (AUC TRA ) were estimated. Results: Of the 22 patients treated in a redifferentiation strategy between March 2014 and December 2021, 15 were included in this study. A dabrafenib- or trametinib-related DLT was experienced by 8 (62%) and 9 (64%) patients, respectively. Patients who experienced a trametinib-related DLT exhibited a significantly higher last AUC TRA than the average AUC TRA of patients who had no DLT (390, IQR: 67 vs. 215, IQR: 91 ng/mL·h -1 , respectively; p  = 0.008). Patients who experienced a dabrafenib-related DLT had a higher AUC DAB than observed in other patients (9265 ng/mL·h -1 vs. 6953 ng/mL·h -1 , respectively; p  = 0.09). No clinical and demographical characteristic was associated with the DLT onset. Overall, 9 of 15 (60%) patients demonstrated tumor redifferentiation. Patients in whom RAI reuptake was achieved had significant lower AUC DAB (6990 ng/mL·h -1 vs. 9764 ng/mL·h -1 , p  = 0.014; respectively) compared with patients who did not. Moreover, the relative exposure ratio of AUC OHD/DAB was significantly higher in patients who achieved RAI reuptake (1.11 vs. 0.71, respectively; p  = 0.0047). Conclusions: Our data suggest a relationship between DLT onset and trametinib plasma exposure, as well as an association between achievement of RAI reuptake and dabrafenib plasma exposure (AUC and ratio of AUC OHD/DAB ). These data imply that the use of plasma drug monitoring could be helpful in guiding clinical practice in redifferentiation treatment.

Prostate cancer is the third cause of cancer-related deaths in men. Its early and reliable diagnosis is still a public health issue, generating many useless prostate biopsies. Prostate cancer cells detected in urine could be the target of a powerful test but they are considered too rare. By using an approach targeting rare cells, we have analyzed urine from 45 patients with prostate cancer and 43 healthy subjects under 50 y.o. We observed a relevant number of giant cells in patients with cancer. Giant cells, named Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells (PGCC), are thought to be involved in tumorigenesis and treatment resistance. We thus performed immune-morphological studies with cancer-related markers such as α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) to understand if the giant cells we found are PGCC or other urinary cells. We found PGCC in the urine of 22 patients, including those with early-stage prostate cancer, and one healthy subject. Although these results are preliminary, they provide, for the first time, clinical evidence that prostate cancers release PGCC into the urine. They are expected to stimulate further studies aimed at understanding the role of urinary PGCC and their possible use as a diagnostic tool and therapeutic target.

Background & Aims: Sarcopenia has long been associated with higher toxicity induced by anti-cancer treatments and shorter survival in patients with solid tumors. The creatinine-to-cystatin ratio (CC ratio, serum creatinine/cystatin C × 100) and the sarcopenia index (SI, serum creatinine × cystatin C (CysC)-based glomerular filtration rate (eGFR CysC )) are have been reported to be correlated with skeletal muscle mass. The aim of this study is to assess primarily whether the CC ratio and the SI could predict mortality in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, and secondarily their impact on severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs)., Methods: From the prospective CERTIM cohort, we analyzed retrospectively stage IV NSCLC patients, who received PD-1 inhibitors between June 2015 and November 2020 in Cochin Hospital (Paris, France). We assessed sarcopenia measuring skeletal muscle area (SMA) by computed tomography and handgrip strength (HGS) by a hand dynamometer., Results: In total, 200 patients were analyzed. The CC ratio and the IS were significantly correlated with SMA and HGS: r CC/SMA  = 0.360, r SI/SMA  = 0.407, r CC/HGS  = 0.331, r SI/HGS  = 0.370. In multivariate analysis of overall survival, a lower CC ratio (HR 1.73, P = 0.033) and a lower SI (HR 1.89, P = 0.019) were independent predictors of poor prognosis. In univariate analysis of severe irAEs, CC ratio (OR 1.01, P = 0.628) and SI (OR 0.99, P = 0.595) were not associated with a higher risk of severe irAEs., Conclusions: In metastatic NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, a lower CC ratio and a lower SI are independent predictors of mortality. However, they are not associated with severe irAEs., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Jérôme Alexandre received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, MSD, GSK, Eisai, Clovis and Novartis. Marco Alifano received consulting fees from Roche and Astra Zaneca, honoraria from Roche, Astra Zaneca and AMGEN and travel accommodation from Medtronic. Jennifer Arrondeau received honoraria from BMS and Astra Zaneca and meeting accommodation from Pfizer. Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette received personal fees from Takeda, Pharmama and IPSEN. Diane Damotte received a research grant from Astra Zaneca. François Goldwasser served on advisory board for Fresenius Kabi and Nutricia and received research grant from Baxter International Inc, USA. Olivier Huillard received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, IPSEN, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Astra Zaneca, Bayer and AAA Novartis and travel accommodation from IPSEN and AAA Novartis. Elisabeth Ashton, Laure Hirsch, Anne Jouinot, Audrey Lupo-Mansuet, Guillaume Ulmann and Marie Wislez have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of the Report: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an extremely rare endocrine malignancy, which cannot always be diagnosed during conventional radiology and hormonal investigations. 18 F-FDG PET could help predict malignancy, but more data are necessary to support future guidelines., Methods: A cohort of 63 patients with histologically proven ACC (n = 55) or metastatic ACC with steroid oversecretion (n = 8) was assembled. All patients underwent an 18 F-FDG PET, and the SUV max and the adrenal-to-liver SUV max ratio were calculated. The 18 F-FDG PET parameters were compared with clinical, pathological, and outcome data., Results: Fifty-six of 63 patients (89%) had an ACC with an adrenal-to-liver SUV max ratio >1.45, which was a previously defined cutoff value to predict malignancy with 100% sensitivity. Seven ACCs (11%) had a lower uptake (adrenal-to-liver SUV max <1.45), most of them with a proliferation marker Ki-67 expression level <10%. A positive correlation between 18 F-FDG PET parameters (SUV max and adrenal-to-liver SUV max ratio) and tumor size, ENSAT (European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors) staging, total Weiss score, and the Ki-67 was found. The strong correlation between SUV max and Ki-67 ( r = 0.47, P = 0.0009) suggests a relationship between 18 F-FDG uptake levels and tumor proliferation. No statistically significant associations between outcome parameters (progression-free or overall survival) and 18 F-FDG PET parameters were found., Conclusions: This large cohort study shows that most cases of ACC demonstrate high 18 F-FDG uptake. However, the positive correlation observed between SUV max and Ki-67 expression levels seems to explain the possibility of identifying some ACC with a low or inexistent 18 F-FDG uptake. These findings have practical implications for the management of patients with an adrenal mass., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine cancer, with a good prognosis in most cases. However, some cancers of follicular origin are metastatic or recurrent and eventually become radioiodine refractory thyroid cancers (RAIR-TC). These more aggressive cancers are a clinical concern for which the therapeutic arsenal remains limited. Molecular biology of these tumors has highlighted a hyper-activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPK) pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK), mostly secondary to the BRAF V600E hotspot mutation occurring in about 60% of papillary cancers and 45% of anaplastic cancers. Therapies targeting the different protagonists of this signaling pathway have been tested in preclinical and clinical models: first and second generation RAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors. In clinical practice, dual therapies with a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor are being recommended in anaplastic cancers with the BRAF V600E mutation. Concerning RAIR-TC, these inhibitors can be used as anti-proliferative drugs, but their efficacy is inconsistent due to primary or secondary resistance. A specific therapeutic approach in thyroid cancers consists of performing a short-term treatment with these MAPK pathway inhibitors to evaluate their capacity to redifferentiate a refractory tumor, with the aim of retreating the patients by radioactive iodine therapy in case of re-expression of the sodium-iodide symporter (NIS). In this work, we report data from recent preclinical and clinical studies on the efficacy of MAPK pathway inhibitors and their resistance mechanisms. We will also report the different preclinical and clinical studies that have investigated the redifferentiation with these therapies.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with an estimated incidence of 0.7 to 2.0 cases per 1 million population per year in the United States. It is an aggressive cancer originating in the cortex of the adrenal gland with a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate is less than 15% among patients with metastatic disease. In this article, we review the epidemiology and pathogenesis of ACC, the diagnostic procedures, the prognostic classification of ACC, and the treatment options from localized and resectable forms to advanced disease detailing recent therapeutic developments such as immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: After temozolomide failure, no evidence-based treatment is available for pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs). To date, only 12 cases treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been published, showing encouraging efficacy. Predictive factors of response are lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the real-life efficacy and predictors of response to ICIs in PCs and APTs., Design and Methods: This study is a multicentric, retrospective, observational cohort study, including all PCs and APTs treated with ICIs in France up to March 2022. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and CD8+ T cell infiltration were evaluated centrally., Results: Six PCs (four corticotroph and two lactotroph) and nine APTs (five corticotroph and four lactotroph) were included. The real-life efficacy of ICIs was lower than previously published data. Three corticotroph tumors (33.3%) showed partial response, one (11.1%) stable disease, while five (55.6%) progressed. One lactotroph tumor (16.7%) showed partial response, one (16.7%) stable disease, while four (66.7%) progressed. PCs responded far better than APTs, with 4/6 PCs showing partial response compared to 0/9 APTs. Corticotroph tumors responded slightly better than lactotroph tumors. In the four responsive corticotroph tumors, PD-L1 staining was negative and CD8+ T cell infiltration attained a maximum of 1% in the tumor center., Conclusions: Confirmation of the presence or absence of metastases is necessary before starting ICIs. After temozolomide failure, ICIs appear as a good therapeutic option for PCs, especially for corticotroph carcinomas. Negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ T cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas., Significance Statement: This is the first study to assess the real-life efficacy of ICIs in pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors. We also assessed potential predictors of response and are the first to assess the predictive value of CD8+ cell infiltration. We identified the tumor type as a major predictor, ICIs proving far more effective in treating PCs. Our study provides evidence that ICIs are a good option after temozolomide failure for PCs (four of six responded), especially for corticotroph carcinomas (three of four responded). We also provide evidence that negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas. Moreover, our findings point toward the need to systematically perform extension workup before starting ICIs.

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged without precedent both healthcare and educational systems worldwide. How medical students could and should be engaged in the response remains unclear. Medical students were asked to help with communicating with patients' relatives in our institution. Authors aimed: to (i) present the rapid implementation and assessment of a teaching/e-teaching lesson in the COVID-19 era; (ii) report an early evaluation of preparedness, mental health and well-being of students involved., Methods: The lesson was elaborated at lockdown in France. The clinical guidance consisted of a voluntary lesson entitled: "How to communicate with relatives of hospitalized COVID-19 patients?". Students received an anonymous online questionnaire after two weeks., Results: Sixty-six medical students were trained (32% face-to-face). The response rate was 64%. Most students informed relatives about the routine care of the patient (95%). Concerning the lesson, students assured to have had one (95%), considered it relevant (86%), and had used the educational content (81%). 33% were charged with unexpected missions (only 36% felt prepared). Most of them did not report any psychological impact, but some reported anxiety or sleep disorders with no difference between face-to-face/distance training., Conclusions: This pandemic may last. Communication ability is a key competence in medical curriculum and is more than ever essential. Distance learning technologies may provide a useful and accepted tool for medical students. We report on a rapid feedback on what can be expected or not from students in terms of mission and short-term psychological consequences., (Copyright © 2021 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor are standard therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. No predictive biomarker of immune related adverse events (iRAE) exists. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) can be the sign of a subclinical autoimmune condition that could be enhanced by Immune checkpoint inhibitor. We decided to assess the predictive value of baseline autoantibodies and ANA for iRAE in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with pembrolizumab and explore their prognostic signification., Patients and Method: Data concerning patients treated in our institution between 2015 and 2020 with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma with available baseline value of ANA and other autoantibodies was collected. ANA with titer >1/80 were defined positive., Results: A total of 68 patients were included. Fifty-five (80%) had ANA >1/80 and among them 21 patients (30%) had ANA >1/160. Seven patients with ANA >160 (33%) presented iRAE vs. 5 patients (10%) in the rest of the population. Presence of ANA >160 was significantly associated with iRAE (P = .029) and limiting toxicity (P = .048) in univariate analysis. iRAE tend to occur earlier, before the third cycle, for patients with ANA >1/160 as compared to rest of the patients (28% vs. 6%, P = .052). Exploratory analysis did not reveal correlation between progression free survival or overall survival and ANA >1/160 in univariate or in multivariate analysis including the Bellmunt score (HR = 0.7, 95%CI [0.38-1.35], P = .5)., Conclusion: The presence of ANA >1/160 is associated with iRAE and limiting toxicity of pembrolizumab., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Until recently, the approved first-line treatment for metastatic RCC (mRCC) consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) monotherapy. The landscape of first-line treatment has been transformed in the last few years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or VEGFR TKI plus ICI combinations. This article focuses on the profile of one of these ICI plus VEGFR TKI combination, avelumab plus axitinib. We detail the characteristics of each drug separately, and then we explore the rationale for their association, its efficacy and the resulting toxicity. Finally, we examine the factors associated with avelumab plus axitinib outcomes, and their impact on therapeutic strategy., Competing Interests: Pr. Goldwasser reports grants and personal fees from BAXTER, and personal fees from FRESENIUS. KABI, and NUTRICIA, outside the submitted work. Dr. Huillard reports personal fees from BAYER, SANOFI, MSD, BMS, IPSEN, PFIZER, EISAI, JANSSEN, and ASTRA ZENECA, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Tiako Meyo et al.)

Background: Nivolumab improved patients’ survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to evaluate resting energy expenditure (REE) (i.e., patients’ basal metabolism) to predict efficacy. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, observational study of mRCC patients receiving nivolumab between October 2015 and May 2020. REE was measured prior to initiating immunotherapy using indirect calorimetry to determine hypo, normo and hypermetabolism. Primary endpoint was 6-month, progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were response rate, PFS and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 51 consecutive patients, 15 (29%) were hypermetabolic, 24 (47%) normometabolic, and 12 (24%) hypometabolic. The 6-month PFS was 15% for hypermetabolic patients and 65% for non-hypermetabolic patients (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, hypermetabolism was the only baseline factor predicting 6-month PFS (OR 9.91, 95%CI [1.62−60.55], p = 0.01). Disease progression was noted as the best response in 73% of hypermetabolic patients and 26% of non-hypermetabolic patients (p = 0.02). Median PFS was 2.8 and 8.7 months (p < 0.01), and median OS was 20.2 and 35.1 months (p = 0.13) in the hypermetabolic and non-hypermetabolic groups, respectively. Conclusions: Our study identifies an association between mRCC patients’ energy expenditure and nivolumab efficacy. The measurement of REE by indirect calorimetry in routine practice could help identify patients at risk of nivolumab failure.

Metastatic thyroid cancers may dedifferentiate and become radioactive-iodine (RAI) resistant. A redifferentiating effect can be observed with inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in thyroid cancers with point mutation in oncogenes. This effect allows RAI reuptake that may lead to a therapeutic effect different from the antitumoral effect of the inhibitor. The potential redifferentiating effect of inhibitors targeting oncogenic fusion-genes was suggested by one adult and one pediatric patient using larotrectinib in NTRK -rearranged tumors. We report on three consecutive adult patients with metastatic RAI-resistant NTRK- rearranged thyroid cancer who received larotrectinib for disease progression and for whom the redifferentiating effect was examined. Larotrectinib-induced RAI reuptake in all or part of the metastatic disease for two patients and no reuptake was noted for the other patient. We demonstrate that redifferentiation of NTRK -rearranged RAI-resistant thyroid cancer with larotrectinib may exist but does not occur in all patients.

Background: We previously reported a 35-gene expression classifier identifying four clear-cell renal cell carcinoma groups (ccrcc1 to ccrcc4) with different tumour microenvironments and sensitivities to sunitinib in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Efficacy profiles might differ with nivolumab and nivolumab-ipilimumab. We therefore aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients according to tumour molecular groups., Methods: This biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial included patients from 15 university hospitals or expert cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had previously untreated metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of varying sizes to receive either nivolumab or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc1 and ccrcc4 groups), or either a VEGFR-TKI or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 groups). Patients assigned to nivolumab-ipilimumab received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to nivolumab received intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to VEGFR-TKIs received oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks) or oral pazopanib (800 mg daily continuously). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the population who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02960906, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2016-003099-28, and is closed to enrolment., Findings: Between June 28, 2017, and July 18, 2019, 303 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment (61 to nivolumab, 101 to nivolumab-ipilimumab, 40 to a VEGFR-TKI). In the nivolumab group, two patients were excluded due to a serious adverse event before the first study dose and one patient was excluded from analyses due to incorrect diagnosis. Median follow-up was 18·0 months (IQR 17·6-18·4). In the ccrcc1 group, objective responses were seen in 12 (29%; 95% CI 16-45) of 42 patients with nivolumab and 16 (39%; 24-55) of 41 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·25-1·56]). In the ccrcc4 group, objective responses were seen in seven (44%; 95% CI 20-70) of 16 patients with nivolumab and nine (50% 26-74) of 18 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·78 [95% CI 0·20-3·01]). In the ccrcc2 group, objective responses were seen in 18 (50%; 95% CI 33-67) of 36 patients with a VEGFR-TKI and 19 (51%; 34-68) of 37 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·95 [95% CI 0·38-2·37]). In the ccrcc3 group, no objective responses were seen in the four patients who received a VEGFR-TKI, and in one (20%; 95% CI 1-72) of five patients who received nivolumab-ipilimumab. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were hepatic failure and lipase increase (two [3%] of 58 for both) with nivolumab, lipase increase and hepatobiliary disorders (six [6%] of 101 for both) with nivolumab-ipilimumab, and hypertension (six [15%] of 40) with a VEGFR-TKI. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients in the nivolumab group, 38 (38%) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group, and ten (25%) patients in the VEGFR-TKI group. Three deaths were treatment-related: one due to fulminant hepatitis with nivolumab-ipilimumab, one death from heart failure with sunitinib, and one due to thrombotic microangiopathy with sunitinib., Interpretation: We demonstrate the feasibility and positive effect of a prospective patient selection based on tumour molecular phenotype to choose the most efficacious treatment between nivolumab with or without ipilimumab and a VEGFR-TKI in the first-line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma., Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, ARTIC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y-AV has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Ipsen (all fees for institution); has been on an advisory board or data safety monitoring board for BMS and Roche; has received honoraria for lectures and presentations from BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Astellas, and Viatris; and has received support for travel or meetings from BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Roche. MB has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, and Astellas. CC has been on an advisory board or data safety monitoring committee for Ipsen, Pfizer, Esaï, and GSK; and has received support for travel or meetings from Pfizer. DB has received research funding from BMS, Roche, MSD, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Exelixis, and Infinity; has received consultancy fees from MSD, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Ipsen, BMS, Janssen, and Sanofi; and has received support for travel or meetings from BMS, Pfizer, Roche, and Ipsen. MG-G has been on an advisory board or data safety monitoring committee for BMS, MSD, Ipsen, and Pfizer; has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from BMS, MSD, Ipsen, and Pfizer; and has received support for travel or meetings from Ipsen and Janssen. CT has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from MSD and BMS; and support for travel or meetings from MSD. BL has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from Pfizer, BMS, and Ipsen; and support for travel or meetings from Pfizer. PBa has received consultancy fees from BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas, and Amgen; honoraria for lectures or presentations from BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas, Bayer, Sanofi, Seagen, and Novartis; and support for travel or meetings from BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas, Sanofi, Seagen, and Novartis. EC has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, and Ipsen. GG has been on an advisory board or data safety monitoring committee for BMS, Janssen, Ipsen Sanofi/Aventis, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Bayer, and AstraZeneca; has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from Janssen Oncology, Ipsen, BMS, Amgen, Sanofi/Aventis, MSD Oncology, and Astellas Pharma (all fees for institution); and has received support for travel or meetings from Janssen Oncology, BMS, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Ipsen, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. OH has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, Ipsen, Novartis, and MSD. LF has been on an advisory board or data safety monitoring committee for Pandas Prodige, Joint French Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa French Guidelines on management of ovarian cancer, European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer, European Society of Oncological Imaging, and European Society of Urogenital Radiology; has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from General Electric, Median Technologies, and Sanofi; and received support for travel or meetings from Guerbet. AdlT has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, and Astellas. KB has received honoraria for lectures or presentations from Ipsen, BMS, MSD, and Intuitive Surgical. TW has received support for travel or meetings from Astellas. GP has received consultancy fees from Roche, Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, and Bouchara-Recordati; and support for travel or meetings from Janssen and Ipsen. SO has received consultancy fees from BMS and Pfizer; and honoraria for lectures or presentations from BMS and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy before surgery is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy modalities have not been precisely defined to date., Patients and Methods: In the VESPER trial, patients received after randomization either gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC, 4 cycles) or methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dose dense [dd]-MVAC, 6 cycles). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated before each cycle according to the Cockroft and Gault formula. Definition criteria for local control after neoadjuvant chemotherapy included pathological complete response (ypT0N0), pathological downstaging (2 for cisplatin was mandatory to optimize pathological complete responses., Conclusion: At least 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be delivered before cystectomy. Increasing the number of cycles beyond 4 cycles does not lead to a clinically significant deterioration in renal function but without obvious gain on local control., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer patients are a highly vulnerable group in the COVID-19 pandemic and it has been necessary for oncology units to adapt to this unexpected situation. We present our management of outpatients with cancer during the pandemic. We applied two major adaptations: extending the intervals between injections for maintenance therapy and protocol adaptation for patients with comorbidities. Between 17 March and 30 April 2020, 406 patients were treated in our outpatients department. Protocols were adapted for 94 (23.1%) patients. Among them, 49% had an extended interval between treatment administrations, 22.3% had modified protocols to reduce toxicity, 20.2% had therapeutic interruptions and 5.3% did not receive their treatment because of a COVID-19 infection. Overall, protocol adaptations concerned more than 20% of the patients. This pandemic was an opportunity for oncologists to re-examine the risk versus benefit balance of administering immunosuppressive treatment and highlighted that oncology daily routine should not be applied automatically., (© Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.)

Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the most common non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Pivotal studies evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors mostly excluded nccRCC. The aim of this retrospective and multicentre study was to evaluate the activity of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors specifically in metastatic pRCC., Methods: The primary end-point was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)., Results: From 02/2016 to 01/2019, 57 patients with pRCC were included. Histology included 16 (28%) type 1 pRCC, 34 (60%) type 2 pRCC and 7 (12%) unclassified pRCC. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was used in the first-line setting in 4 patients (7%), in the second-line setting in 32 patients (56%) and in the third-line setting or more in 21 patients (37%). With a median follow-up of 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-21.0), the median TTF was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.0). Among the 55 patients evaluable for ORR, best response was complete response/partial response in 6 patients (11%), stable disease in 18 patients (33%) and progressive disease in 31 patients (56%). The median OS was 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.0- not reached). TRAEs of grade III-IV were noted in 6 patients (10%) leading to treatment discontinuation, and no grade V TRAEs were observed., Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibit limited activity as monotherapy in this pRCC population, which remains an unmet need. Our findings underline the need for further prospective clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in patients with pRCC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement M.G.-G. reports receiving honoraria from Ipsen, Janssen, Astellas Pharma; has served consultant or advisory role in Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Ipsen and MSD; reports receiving research funding from MSD, BMS, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer and Roche and travel accommodation expenses from Amgen, MSD, Roche, Pfizer and Sanofi. B.B. has served consultant or advisory role in BMS; has been a member of the speaker's bureau of Pfizer and Ipsen; reports receiving research funding from Pfizer and BMS and travel and accommodation expenses from Pfizer. C.T. has served consulting or advisory role in BMS, Pfizer and Ipsen and reports receiving travel and accommodation expenses from Pfizer and Roche. C.C. has served consultant or advisory role in Pfizer, Novartis and BMS. P.B. has served consultant or advisory role in BMS, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Ipsen, Novartis, and Sanofi and reports receiving honoraria from Astellas Pharma and travel and accommodation expenses from Amgen. S.N. reports receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Ipsen, BMS, EUSA Pharma and Novartis; research grant from Pfizer and travel expenses from BMS, Pfizer and Ipsen. D.B. has served consultant or advisory role in BMS, Ipsen and Pfizer and travel and accommodation expenses from Roche. O.H. reports receiving honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen and GSK and travel expense from Ipsen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Janssen and Astellas Pharma. L.G. has served consulting or advisory role in BMS, MSD, Novartis, Ipsen and Janssen. G.G. reports receiving travel expenses from BMS and Pfizer. A.T.-V. reports receiving honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Novartis, Ipsen, BMS andRoche; has served consultant or advisory role in Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Novartis, Ipsen, BMS and Roche and reports receiving research funding from Pfizer and travel and accommodation expenses from BMS, Roche, Janssen and Pfizer. B.E. has served advisory role for BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Ipsen, EUSA and Aveo and reports receiving travel grants from BMS and Pfizer and research grants from BMS, Novartis, Aveo and Pfizer. A.R. has served consultant or advisory role in Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD and Ipsen and reports receiving travel and accommodation expenses from Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD and Ipsen and institutional grant from Pfizer. L.A. has served consultant or advisory role in Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Ipsen, Roche, MSD and AstraZeneca. M.de.V.-B., V.S., E.B., S.L., C.S. report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)