Search

Introduction: The use of lipid emulsion in TPN for preterm infants can affect clinical outcomes., Objective: To assess the potential beneficial health outcomes and economic impact of including SMOFlipid emulsion in TPN for preterm infants, specifically focusing on the incidence of neonatal sepsis, LOS in the NICU, and the associated economic implications from the perspective of healthcare providers in Egypt., Methods: A record-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2021. We collected data from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Alexandria University Pediatric Hospital, Egypt, for newborns who received TPN. The collected data included gestational age, birth weight, sex, diagnosis of sepsis, LOS in the NICU and type of TPN. Our sample consisted of 103 newborns who received TPN with SMOFlipid and 104 newborns who received TPN without SMOFlipid. Using the propensity score, the study groups' baseline characteristics were balanced. Odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, and the statistical significance was set at < 0.05., Results: Compared to TPN without lipids, the use of SMOFlipid was associated with an observed reduction in the risk of sepsis (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.272-1.51), as well as a difference in the mean reduction in hospital stay (4.12 days, p = 0.08). Furthermore, using SMOFlipid was associated with a significant mean reduction in cost of 6,396 EGP (95% CI: 1,491-11,546 EGP)., Conclusion: The integration of SMOFlipid into TPN for preterm infants is associated with decreased incidence of sepsis, reduced NICU stay, and significant cost savings, warranting consideration for standard care practices., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Ethics considerations were obtained according to the guidelines of the ethical committee of Medical Research Institute, and data will be anonymous to keep patients’ confidentiality. The experimental protocol for this research was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Egypt. In the context of our retrospective study the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethical committee of Medical Research Institute, Alexandria university. This decision was made following the ethical guidelines of the Medical Research Institute. We assure you that patient confidentiality and ethical considerations were upheld throughout the study. Consent for publication: As no identifying human images or personal details were used in the study, consent for publication was not needed. Individual person’s data: Not applicable. Experiments involving human participants: The research reported in this manuscript did not involve any experiments with human participants, including the use of tissue samples. Therefore, informed consent was not needed from subjects or their legal guardians. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: Drug shortages continue to impact our patients with intestinal failure and their ability to receive nutrition. ASPEN guidelines address the management of certain shortages in compounded total parenteral nutrition (TPN); however, some institutions have utilized premixed total parenteral nutrition (pTPN) in place of TPN., Recent Findings: Premixed TPN appears to be as safe, if not safer, as compounded TPN when comparing the risk of bloodstream infection. However, there is an increased use of supplemental electrolytes to meet patient needs. Cost-effectiveness depends on multiple factors and should be evaluated by each institution when considering the use of TPN. In light of the published information on the use of pTPN compared to TPN, institutions and nutrition clinicians should consider their current practice and opportunities to consider when pTPN may be beneficial for their patients, not only from a safety perspective, but also considering cost savings. However, close monitoring and individual patient needs should be considered as these formulas may not meet all patient nutritional and electrolyte needs.

Purpose: To determine the impact of intra-operative Trans-anastomotic Tube (TAT) placement on the cost of post-operative nutrition in infants with congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO)., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing corrective surgery for CDO, with birth-weight over 1.5 kg over a 10-year period. Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) and analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate., Results: 59 patients were included. There was no difference between TAT and non-TAT groups for baseline characteristics, age at operation and abnormality. In the TAT group there was a significant reduction in the duration of post-operative parenteral nutrition (PN) [6 (0-11) vs 12 (8-19) days, p = 0.006], the cost of PN [£750 (0-1375) vs £1500 (1000-2375), p = 0.006] and the total cost of nutrition [£765.26 (38.36-1404) vs £1387.52 (1008.23-2363.08), p = 0.015], thereby demonstrating a median cost saving of £622.26 per patient. 14% experienced TAT displacement but no other TAT complications were encountered., Conclusion: The use of a TAT is a safe and effective way to reduce the duration of PN required in patients with CDO. This infers a significant cost saving per patient, a factor that cannot be overlooked in this period of austerity.

Background and Objectives: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and costs of commercial standardized multi-chamber bag and customized compounded total parenteral nutrition (TPN) among gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy., Methods and Study Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 64 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy from 2014 to 2016 in a tertiary teaching hospital in Beijing, China. Patients were categorized into standardized (s-TPN) and customized TPN (c-TPN) groups based on their TPN order after gastrectomy. Patients were followed up until discharge. The effectiveness measures (body mass index (BMI) and albumin) and safety measures (liver and renal functions and electrolytes) were compared before TPN started and after TPN finished within and between the two groups. The length of hospital stay and costs were compared be-tween the two groups., Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in BMI preserva-tion, metabolic complications, the length of hospital stay and costs, except that both total bilirubin (Tbil) and di-rect bilirubin (Dbil) were significantly higher in the s-TPN group than c-TPN (p<0.05)., Conclusions: There were no significant differences in effectiveness and safety measures, the length of hospital stay and costs between s-TPN and c-TPN groups, except that s-TPN group was more likely to lead to parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD). More studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study in other healthcare settings and study populations.

Background: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is the most frequent pancreatic specific complication (PSC) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Several gastric decompression systems exist to manage DGE. Patients with a pancreatic tumor require prolonged nutrition; however, controversies exist concerning nutrition protocol after PD. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of nasogastric (NG), gastrostomy (GT), and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes with different feeding systems on postoperative courses., Methods: Between January 2013 and March 2016, 86 patients underwent PD with pancreaticogastrostomy. Patients were divided into three groups: GJ group with enteral nutrition (EN, n = 12, 14%), NG (n = 31, 36%) and GT groups (n = 43, 50%), both with total parenteral nutrition (TPN)., Results: Patients in the GJ (n = 9, 75%) and GT (n = 18, 42%) groups had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 more often than those in the NG group (n = 5, 16%, p ≤ 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified the GT tube with TPN as an independent risk factor of severe morbidity (p = 0.02) and DGE (p < 0.01). An ASA score of 3, jaundice, common pancreatic duct size ≤3 mm and soft pancreatic gland texture (p < 0.05) were found as independent risk factors of PSCs. Use of a GJ tube with EN, GT tube with TPN, jaundice, and PSCs were identified as independent risk factors for greater postoperative length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). Mean global hospitalization cost did not differ between groups., Conclusion: GT tube insertion with TPN was associated with increased severe postoperative morbidity and DGE and should not be recommended. EN through a GJ tube after PD is feasible but does not have clear advantages on postoperative courses compared to an NG tube.

Background: Children with intestinal failure (IF) depend on parenteral nutrition (PN). The goal in the treatment of IF is to wean children off PN through intestinal rehabilitation (IR). Although the healthcare burden of IF is enormous, to our knowledge there has been no previous cost-effectiveness analysis in pediatric IF including IR., Objective: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of IR in terms of costs and life-years., Design: We simulated the treatment of IF in children in a discrete-event model. Data for this model were derived from patient records, the Dutch Registry of Intestinal Failure and Transplantation, the Intestinal Transplant Registry, and the literature. The time horizon of the model was 40 y. Simulated patients were enrolled at a rate of 40 patients/mo for 10 y. Actual costs were calculated for hospital admissions, surgical interventions, endoscopies, PN, and immunosuppressive medication. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of IR by comparing 1 scenario with IR with 1 scenario without IR. In the scenario with IR, a proportion of patients who represented those with the ability to wean off PN were assigned to IR. In the scenario without IR, all patients progressed to home PN (HPN). In both scenarios, a proportion of patients receiving HPN were eventually eligible for an intestinal transplantation., Results: IR prolonged survival; the mean number of life-years per patient was 19.4 in the scenario with IR compared with 18.2 in the scenario without IR. Average total costs per patient were €819,292 in the scenario with IR compared with €1,176,830 in the scenario without IR (equivalent to 1,129,230 US$ and 1,622,025 US$, respectively, in January 2014); costs mainly included hospital admissions and PN., Conclusions: On the basis of our simulations, we concluded that IR improved the survival of children with IF and was associated with cost savings. Therefore, we consider IR to be a cost-effective treatment for children with IF., (© 2017 American Society for Nutrition.)

Background and Aims: Malnutrition and the use of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) contribute considerably to hospital costs. Recently, we reported on the introduction of malnutrition screening and monitoring of TPN use in our hospital, which resulted in a large (40%) reduction in TPN and improved quality of nutritional care in two years (2011/12). Here, we aimed to assure continuation of improved care by developing a detailed malnutrition screening and TPN use protocol involving instruction tools for hospital staff, while monitoring the results in the following two years (2013/14)., Methods: A TPN decision tree for follow up of TPN in patients and a TP-EN instruction card for caregivers was introduced, showing TPN/EN introduction schedules based on the energy needs of patients according to EB guidelines, also addressing the risk of refeeding syndrome. TPN patients were monitored by dietitians and TPN usage and costs were presented to the (medical) staff. Screening and treatment of malnourished patients by dietitians is simultaneously ongoing., Results: In 2014 48% of patients, hospitalized for at least 48 h, were screened on malnutrition, 17% of them were diagnosed at risk, 7.9% malnourished and treated by dietitians. TPN usage dropped by 53% and cost savings of 51% were obtained due to 50% decrease of TPN users in 2014 versus 2010. TPN over EN ratio dropped from 2.4 in 2010 to 1.2 in 2014., Conclusion: Sustained improvement of nutritional care and reduction of TPN usage and costs is possible by introduction of procedures embedded in the existing structures., (Copyright © 2016 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Total nutrient admixture (TNA) is a complete parenteral nutrition (PN) formulation composed of all macronutrients, including dextrose, amino acids, and intravenous fat emulsions (IVFE), in one bag. The TNA may be safely administered to the patient, with all components aseptically compounded and minimal administration manipulation required, lending itself to decreases in risks of catheter contamination and patient infections. The TNA is compatible and stable at recommended concentrations, and since the IVFE is in the TNA, it is infused at slower rates, allowing for better fat clearance. The TNA offers convenience of administration and a potential cost savings to the healthcare institution both directly and indirectly. Unfortunately, the TNA is not without concerns. At low macronutrient concentrations (lower than recommended), the formulation is compromised. Greater divalent and monovalent cation amounts and increased concentrations of phosphate and calcium may destabilize the TNA or result in precipitation, respectively. With the addition of IVFE in the TNA, catheter occlusion is greater and larger pore size filters are necessary, resulting in less microbial elimination. Determining if the implementation of the TNA is appropriate for an institution requires a recognition of the advantages and disadvantages of the TNA as well as an understanding of the institution's patient population and their nutrition requirements., (© 2015 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Background: Determining the costs of healthcare delivery is a key step for providing efficient nutrition-based care. This analysis tabulates the costs of delivering home parenteral nutrition (HPN) interventions and clinical assessments through encrypted mobile technologies to increase patients' access to healthcare providers, reduce their travel expenses, and allow early detection of infection and other complications., Methods: A traditional cost-accounting method was used to tabulate all expenses related to mobile distance HPN clinic appointments, including (1) personnel time of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, (2) supply of HPN intervention materials, and (3) equipment, connection, and delivery expenses., Results: A total of 20 mobile distance clinic appointments were conducted for an average of 56 minutes each with 45 patients who required HPN infusion care. The initial setup costs included mobile tablet devices, 4G data plans, and personnel's time as well as intervention materials. The initial costs were on average $916.64 per patient, while the follow-up clinic appointments required $361.63 a month, with these costs continuing to decline as the equipment was used by multiple patients more frequently over time. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with cost savings in travel expenses and rated the quality of care comparable to traditional in-person examinations., Conclusion: This study provides important aspects of the initial cost tabulation for visual assessment for HPN appointments. These findings will be used to generate a decision algorithm for scheduling mobile distance clinic appointments intermittent with in-person visits to determine how to lower costs of nutrition assessments. To maximize the cost benefits, clinical trials must continue to collect clinical outcomes., (© 2014 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Nutritional support of surgical and critically ill patients has undergone significant advances since 1936 when Studley demonstrated a direct relationship between pre-operative weight loss and operative mortality. The advent of total parenteral nutrition followed by the extraordinary progress in parenteral and enteral feedings, in addition to the increased knowledge of cellular biology and biochemistry, have allowed clinicians to treat malnutrition and improve surgical patient's outcomes. We reviewed the literature for the current status of perioperative nutrition comparing parenteral nutrition with enteral nutrition. In a surgical patient with established malnutrition, nutritional support should begin at least 7-10 days prior to surgery. Those patients in whom eating is not anticipated beyond the first five days following surgery should receive the benefits of early enteral or parenteral feeding depending on whether the gut can be used. Compared to parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition is associated with fewer complications, a decrease in the length of hospital stay, and a favorable cost-benefit analysis. In addition, many patients may benefit from newer enteral formulations such as Immunonutrition as well as disease-specific formulations.

Aim: To investigate the effects of prolonging hang time of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) fluid on central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), TPN-related cost and nursing workload., Methods: A before-after observational study comparing the practice of hanging TPN bags for 48 h (6 February 2009-5 February 2010) versus 24 h (6 February 2008-5 February 2009) in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit was conducted. The main outcome measures were CLABSI, TPN-related expenses and nursing workload., Results: One hundred thirty-six infants received 24-h TPN bags and 124 received 48-h TPN bags. Median (inter-quartile range) gestation (37 weeks (33,39) vs. 36 weeks (33,39)), mean (±standard deviation) admission weight of 2442 g (±101) versus 2476 g (±104) and TPN duration (9.7 days (±12.7) vs. 9.9 days (±13.4)) were similar (P > 0.05) between the 24- and 48-h TPN groups. There was no increase in CLABSI with longer hang time (0.8 vs. 0.4 per 1000 line days in the 24-h vs. 48-h group; P < 0.05). Annual cost saving using 48-h TPN was AUD 97,603.00. By using 48-h TPN, 68.3% of nurses indicated that their workload decreased and 80.5% indicated that time spent changing TPN reduced., Conclusion: Extending TPN hang time from 24 to 48 h did not alter CLABSI rate and was associated with a reduced TPN-related cost and perceived nursing workload. Larger randomised controlled trials are needed to more clearly delineate these effects., (© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).)

Introduction: The supplementation of alanyl-glutamine dipeptide in critically ill patients necessitating total parenteral nutrition (TPN) improves clinical outcomes, reducing mortality, infection rate, and shortening intensive care unit (ICU) hospital lengths of stay (LOSs), as compared to standard TPN regimens., Methods: A Discrete Event Simulation model that incorporates outcomes rates from 200 Italian ICUs for over 60,000 patients, alanyl-glutamine dipeptide efficacy data synthesized by means of a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis, and national cost data has been developed to evaluate the alternatives from the cost perspective of the hospital. Simulated clinical outcomes are death and infection rates in ICU, death rate in general ward, and hospital LOSs. Sensitivity analyses are performed by varying all uncertain parameter values in a plausible range., Results: The internal validation process confirmed the accuracy of the model in replicating observed clinical data. Alanyl-glutamine dipeptide on average results more effective and less costly than standard TPN: reduced mortality rate (24.6% ± 1.6% vs. 34.5% ± 2.1%), infection rate (13.8% ± 2.9% vs. 18.8% ± 3.9%), and hospital LOS (24.9 ± 0.3 vs. 26.0 ± 0.3 days) come at a lower total cost per patient (23,409 ± 3,345 vs. 24,161 ± 3,523 Euro).Treatment cost is completely offset by savings on ICU and antibiotic costs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results., Conclusions: Alanyl-glutamine dipeptide is expected to improve clinical outcomes and to do so with a concurrent saving for the Italian hospital.

Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the economic and clinical efficacy of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team (NST) for autologous stem cell transplantation., Methods: We performed a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with and without NST intervention at a single institute. Patients (n = 120) had undergone 169 ASCTs, 67 before the commencement of NST intervention in September 2005 and 102 after September 2005. The conditioning regimens, prophylactic antibiotics, and supportive care were unchanged from 2001 through 2008. The duration of hospitalization, cost, and laboratory data were analyzed., Results: With NST intervention, the duration of total parenteral nutrition, absence of oral food intake, hospitalization, and therapeutic antibiotic usage were significantly shortened by 11.4, 9.7, 8.1, and 4.5 d, respectively. With NST intervention, the incidence of hepatic adverse events and hyperglycemia was low, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly decreased by 403 600 yen (US $4484.40). Two cases of therapy-related death were recorded before September 2005. No therapy-related mortality was observed after commencement of NST intervention; however, the difference was not significant., Conclusion: Multidisciplinary NST intervention has a positive effect on cost decrease, and it may decrease the incidence of adverse events associated with ASCT and total parenteral nutrition., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has been recognized as the mainstay of nutritional support in patients with severe hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) diseases for decades. However, recent studies advocate the utilization of endoscopic nasojejunal feeding tube placement (ENFTP), rather than the conventional approach. This study was designed to compare the clinical value of ENFTP and TPN in patients with severe HPB diseases., Methods: Two groups of patients with severe HPB diseases were analyzed retrospectively. One group of 88 patients received ENFTP, and the other 96 received TPN. Routine blood levels, serum glucose and prealbumin, hepatic and renal function, serum lipid, and calcium were measured at baseline and after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of nutritional support. Also, complication rate, mortality, nutritional support time, mechanical ventilation time, mean length of time in intensive care unit, and duration of hospital stay were analyzed., Results: After 4 weeks of nutritional support, the degree of recovery of red blood cells, prealbumin, and blood glucose was greater in the ENFTP than in the TPN group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the ENFTP group showed a lower incidence of septicemia, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, peri-pancreatic infection, biliary infection, and nosocomial infection, in addition to shorter nutritional support time and hospital stay (P<0.05)., Conclusions: ENFTP is much more effective than TPN in assisting patients with severe HPB diseases to recover from anemia, low prealbumin level, and high serum glucose, as well as in decreasing the rates of various infections (pulmonary infection excluded), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome rate, nutrition support time, and length of hospital stay. Therefore, ENFTP is safer and more economical for clinical application.

Nasogastric tube-assisted enteral feeding and parenteral feeding are utilized for nutritional support after major surgery. Although these nutritional supports have been compared before, there have been no comparative trials following surgery for laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer. In this study, 81 patients were randomized to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or nasogastric tube nutrition (NGTN) after laryngopharyngeal cancer surgery. The two groups were well-matched demographically and clinically. Clinical outcomes such as time of commencement of oral feeding and hospital stay and complications such as fistula were similar in both groups. One case in the TPN group had catheter-related sepsis, whereas aspiration pneumonia occurred in four cases (9.8%) in the NGTN group. The daily cost of NGTN was $11.81 cheaper than that of TPN. Subjective symptoms of nasal and pharyngeal discomfort and scores on subjective swallowing were more severe in the NGTN group within the first postoperative week but became similar thereafter. Although there was no difference in objective postoperative outcomes between both groups, these results imply that each method had particular advantages and disadvantages. Nutritional support after laryngopharyngeal cancer surgery should be determined after full consideration of each patient's conditions and surgical details along with economics.

The cost of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is substantial in terms of morbidity, mortality and financial resources. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a recognised risk factor for CRBSI. In 1997, an intravenous nutrition nurse was promoted to TPN surveillance clinical nurse manager (CNM) and quarterly infection audit meetings were introduced to monitor trends in CRBSI. Data were prospectively collected over a 15-year period using specific TPN records in a 535-bed tertiary acute university hospital. A total of 20 439 CVC-days and 307 CRBSIs were recorded. Mean number of infections before, and after, the introduction of a dedicated TPN surveillance CNM were compared. Mean CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days+/-SD was 20.5+/-6.34 prior to 1997 and 14.64+/-7.81 after 1997, representing a mean reduction of 5.84 CRBSIs per 1000 catheter-days (95% CI: -4.92 to 16.60; P=0.05). Mean number of CRBSIs per year+/-SD was 28.3+/-4.93 prior to 1997 and 18.5+/-7.37 after 1997, representing a mean decrease of 9.8 infections per year (95% CI: 0.01 to 19.66; P<0.05). The savings made by preventing 9.8 infections per year were calculated from data on bed-days obtained from the hospital finance office. The cost in hospital days saved per annum was euro135,000. Introduction of a TPN surveillance CNM saved the hospital at least euro78,300 per annum and led to a significant decrease in CRBSIs in TPN patients.

Background: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is associated with known costs, including the use of invasive procedures, which may be necessary to optimize care. Our purpose was to document TPN use in trauma patients over time as well as concurrent changes in TPN-associated complications., Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit during a period of 6 years from a Level I trauma center. Comparative cohorts and the matched case-control approaches were used to analyze the difference in outcomes between patients with and without TPN during hospitalization. Logistic regression model was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups of patients adjusting for significant risk factors. The McNemar's test was used to assess the differences in outcomes between the cases and their matched controls., Results: There were 2,964 patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit during the 6-year period and 464 patients received TPN during their hospital course. TPN use decreased significantly from 26% in the year 2000 to 3% in 2005 (p < 0.0001). Excluding those who died in the first 72 hours, the mortality rate was significantly lower (5.4% no TPN vs. 10.2% TPN, p = 0.001) in patients who were managed without TPN. Complication rates (wound infection, dehiscence, line sepsis, bacteremia, sepsis, pneumonia, renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) were significantly higher in patients that were managed with TPN. Multivariate analysis adjusting for abbreviated injury score, injury severity score, mechanism, admission year, dialysis, ventilator use, hollow viscous injury, and solid organ injury found that TPN use was still an independent risk factor for increased complications but not death. The matched case-control approach confirmed this finding. TPN use was also associated with increase intensive care unit and hospital length of stay., Conclusions: The rate of TPN use has declined significantly from 26% to 3% during the 6-year period. The change in practice of minimizing TPN was concurrent with decreased complications and less hospital resource utilization without negatively impacting mortality.

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between oral mucositis (OM) and adverse clinical and economic outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) following high-dose melphalan (Alkeran) conditioning in patients with multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of 115 consecutive autologous HSCT recipients with multiple myeloma who received high-dose melphalan conditioning before transplantation was undertaken at a single academic center. OM severity was assessed twice weekly using a validated scale beginning 3-4 days following conditioning and continuing until hospital discharge or day 28, whichever occurred first. OM was graded, based on presence/extent of erythema/ulceration across eight oropharyngeal sites, as follows: 0 = no erythema or ulceration; I = erythema but no ulceration; II = ulceration, 1 site; III = ulceration, 2 sites; IV = ulceration, 3 sites; and V = ulceration, > or = 4 sites. Analyses examined the relationship between worst OM grade and selected clinical and economic outcomes, including days with fever, days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN),days of parenteral narcotic therapy, incidence of significant infection, and inpatient days and charges. The mean age of study subjects was 54 years; 19 patients (17%) received total-body irradiation, and 55 patients (48%) experienced OM grade > or = II (ie, ulceration). The worst OM grade was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with numbers of days of TPN and parenteral narcotic therapy, length of hospitalization, and total inpatient charges. Worst OM grade was not associated with the number of febrile days or the risk of significant infection. OM is associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous HSCT following high-dose melphalan conditioning.

Introduction: Intestinal transplantation has become a life-saving therapy in patients with irreversible loss of intestinal function and complications of total parenteral nutrition., Discussion: The patient and graft survival rates have improved over the last years, especially after the introduction of tacrolimus and rapamycin. However, intestinal transplantation is more challenging than other types of solid organ transplantation due to its large amount of immune competent cells and its colonization with microorganisms. Moreover, intestinal transplantation is still a low volume procedure with a small number of transplanted patients especially in Germany. A current matter of concern is the late referral of intestinal transplant candidates., Conclusion: Thus, patients often present after onset of life-threatening complications or advanced cholestatic liver disease. Earlier timing of referral for candidacy might result in further improvement of this technique in the near future.

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) allows us to meet a neonates requirement for growth and development when their size or condition precludes enteral feeding. Although feeding through the gastrointestinal tract is the preferred route for nutritional management, there are specific conditions where PN as an adjunctive or sole therapy is necessary. In very low birth weight premature infants, due to the immaturity of the gastrointestinal systems, enteral feeding cannot be established in the first few days of life. In critically ill neonates, neonates with protracted diarrhea and neonates who have had major GI surgery, PN can successfully meet the nutritional demands. Parenteral Nutrition solutions, although still evolving, have improved considerably since the early days and complications are now less common when amino acids and lipids are given in a dose of 1-3 g / kg / day. Meticulous attention to asepsis, good nursing care and close biochemical monitoring are absolutely essential for successful PN therapy.

Drugs are indispensable for the management of symptoms in palliative care patients, and account for a significant proportion of expenditures on a Tertiary Palliative Care Unit (TPCU). Drug expenditures for Edmonton's TPCU increased by 40% in 2002 compared to 2001. Fifty-five percent of the increase was attributable to injectable fentanyl, oral and injectable ondansetron, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). As there was no increase in the unit cost of these drugs between 2001 and 2002, the increased expenditures reflected increased utilization. The hypothesis of this study was that the increased utilization of these drugs reflected appropriate prescribing. The objective was to compare the indications for prescribing these drugs in 2002 against evidence- and consensus-based criteria. Patients who received these drugs while admitted to the TPCU from January 1 to December 31, 2002 were identified through the pharmacy database. Evidence- and consensus-based criteria for drug utilization were developed. Prescribing indications were retrospectively compared against the criteria. Drug prescriptions were categorized as follows: (1) meeting criteria, (2) not meeting criteria, or (3) uncertain. The drugs under study were prescribed during 48 out of 234 admissions to the TPCU in 2002. Prescriptions for fentanyl met criteria in 26 of 29 cases. Indications were unsuccessful therapy with morphine, hydromorphone, and oxycodone (20), requirement for rapid titration from fentanyl patch (5), renal failure (2), and sublingual administration for breakthrough pain (1). Prescriptions for ondansetron met criteria in 19 of 21 cases. Indications were nausea refractory to metoclopramide and dexamethasone (13), and nausea related to radiotherapy or chemotherapy (6). Prescriptions for TPN met criteria for initiation in only one of five cases. However, in all cases, TPN had been started prior to admission. In cases where death was considered imminent, TPN was continued pending consultation with the patient and family regarding discontinuation. These data indicate that the increased prescribing of fentanyl and ondansetron on the TPCU satisfied evidence- and consensus-based criteria in most cases, apparently justifying the associated increase in drug expenditures. This type of analysis may be useful whenever increased drug utilization requires review. A cost effectiveness analysis would be the next step in evaluating the costs vs. the benefits. The issue of discontinuing TPN in palliative care patients requires further investigation.

Purpose of Review: Ergonomics in total parenteral nutrition include the work performed in the (hospital) pharmacy and on the medical ward. This article reviews the developments in total parenteral nutrition ergonomics and the related cost-savings., Recent Findings: Research focuses on the ergonomic advantages of multi-compartment total parenteral nutrition bags compared with the multi-bottle system, of multi versus single-layered total parenteral nutrition bags and of the presence of a nutritional team and training in clinical nutrition to improve regimen prescription and delivery., Summary: Three-compartment bags are safe, economic and ergonomic. It is important, however, to keep the knowledge of pharmacies to compound total parenteral nutrition for children and (adult) patients with specific pathologies. Research is ongoing in the development of bags with more than three compartments, to include for instance vitamins. This necessitates improvements in bag materials and wrapping. Progress can be made regarding total parenteral nutrition prescription and delivery, as well as in the incidence of related infections by promoting training in clinical nutrition and the implementation of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team.

Background: Catheter-related sepsis remains the major confounding factor in the long-term delivery of TPN. Previous studies have shown that the introduction of clinical nurse specialists (CNS) can lead to a reduction in sepsis from TPN catheters. This retrospective study aimed to determine the impact of a nutrition CNS on the rate of catheter-related sepsis. Furthermore, the cost of providing such a service was examined to see if it was offset from the savings obtained from reducing venous access infection., Methods: Prior to the employment of a nutrition CNS, the total number of septic catheter complications were retrospectively collected over a 12-month period. Following appointment of the CNS, all patients requiring TPN were prospectively studied for signs of catheter-related sepsis and the data collected over a 4-year period., Results: The overall sepsis rate (cumulative percentage) fell significantly in the 4-year period after the nutrition CNS was appointed, from 52% to 2.3%. The reduction in venous catheter access was accompanied by a decrease in cost related to wastage of TPN and insertion of new Hickman lines., Conclusion: The role of the CNS is primarily to improve the quality of care provided, but also to provide cost effectiveness. We have demonstrated that in addition to reducing infection rate of central venous catheters; the cost of employing a nutrition CNS is almost completely covered by the savings resulting from the reduction in wasted central venous catheters, TPN and operating time.

The purpose of this study was to decrease the number of inappropriate orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in surgical patients. From February 1999 through November 2000 and between July 2001 and June 2002, the surgeon-guided adult nutrition support team (NST) at a university hospital monitored new TPN orders for appropriateness and specific indication. In April 1999, the NST was given authority to discontinue inappropriate TPN orders. Indications, based on the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) standards, included short gut, severe pancreatitis, severe malnutrition/catabolism with inability to enterally feed > or =5 days, inability to enterally feed >50 per cent of nutritional needs > or =9 days, enterocutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal leak, bowel obstruction, chylothorax, ischemic bowel, hemodynamic instability, massive gastrointestinal bleed, and lack of abdominal wall integrity. The number of inappropriate TPN orders declined from 62/194 (32.0%) in the first 11 months of the study to 22/168 (13.1%) in the second 11 months (P < 0.0001). This number further declined to 17/215 (7.9%) in the final 12 months of data collection, but compared to the second 11 months, this decrease was not statistically significant (P = 0.1347). The involvement of a surgical NST was associated with a reduction in inappropriate TPN orders without a change in overall use.

Background: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a specialized form of nutrition support. The complexity associated with the management of patients receiving TPN therapy has led to the development of multidisciplinary TPN teams. The purpose of this review was to critically analyze the literature and present the best available evidence that investigated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary TPN teams in the provision of TPN to adult hospitalized patients., Methods: A systematic review of studies identified from the Cochrane Library (2001, Issue 4), CINAHL, Complete MEDLINE, Complete Biomedical Collection, Complete Nursing Collection, and EMBASE, published in any language., Results: Eleven studies, 4 with concurrent controls and 7 with historical controls, were eligible for inclusion in the review. Results of the studies indicate that the incidence of total mechanical complications is reduced in patients managed by the TPN team. However, the benefit of the TPN team in the reduction of catheter-related sepsis remains inconclusive. Four of the 5 studies reported fewer total metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities in patients cared for by the team, and these patients were more likely to receive their optimal caloric intake. However it was unclear if the management of the patients by the TPN team prevented the inappropriate use of TPN therapy. Although only 2 studies (n = 356) investigated total costs associated with management of patients by the TPN teams, there was evidence that a team approach is a cost-effective strategy., Conclusions: Overall, the general effectiveness of the TPN team has not been conclusively demonstrated. There is evidence that patients managed by TPN teams have a reduced incidence of total mechanical complications; however, it is unclear if there is a reduction in catheter-related sepsis and metabolic and electrolyte complications. The available evidence, although limited, suggests financial benefits from the introduction of multidisciplinary TPN teams in the hospital setting.

Objective: To evaluate the difference in nutrient intakes and biochemical responses in newborn infants <33 weeks gestation who received standardized versus individualized total parenteral nutrition (TPN) regimes., Method: Comparison of nutrient intakes and daily biochemical responses in newborn infants <33 weeks gestation who received standardized regime versus those who received individualized TPN regimes from day 2 to day 7 of life., Results: Twenty-seven infants in the standardized TPN group and 31 infants in the individualized TPN group were compared. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in gestation, birthweight, Clinical Risk Index for Babies scores, daily TPN volume intake and biochemical responses. Infants in the standardized TPN group received less sodium (P < 0.01) and no potassium on day 2 as required, more protein (P < 0.02) every day, and more calcium and phosphate (P < 0.02 from day 4)., Conclusion: There were no significant clinical and statistical differences in biochemical responses in newborn infants <33 weeks gestation who received standardized versus individualized TPN regimes during the first week of life. The economic cost of TPN provision using standardized TPN formulation was approximately 30% lower.

Studies have shown that protein catabolism increases by 80% and energy expenditure by 20% in acute pancreatitis, indicating that nutritional requirements are elevated. Other studies have associated the resolution of negative nitrogen balance by nutrition support with improved outcome. Consequently, the need for effective nutrition is one cornerstone of management of acute pancreatitis. Concerns that feeding may exacerbate the disease process by stimulating the synthesis of proteolytic enzymes in the acinar cell and perpetuating autolysis has led to the widespread use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and bowel rest. Unfortunately, the use of TPN in clinical practice has been associated with major metabolic and infective complications, possibly because 1). patients with acute pancreatitis are intolerant of glucose due to coexistent pancreatic endocrine dysfunction and 2). the disease causes immune suppression. This has led to the search for alternatives. Based on physiologic studies, infusion of nutrients into the distal jejunum bypasses the stimulatory effect of feeding on pancreatic secretion. Many controlled trials have compared TPN with jejunal feeding. No study has shown that jejunal feeding exacerbates the disease. Further, jejunal feeding is associated with fewer infectious and metabolic complications. These observations and the fact that enteral feeding is one-tenth the cost of TPN has resulted in the general acceptance of jejunal feeding as the preferred mode for maintaining nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Background: The management of acute pancreatitis (AP) frequently includes parenteral nutrition, but conditionally essential amino acids such as glutamine are not included in conventional total parenteral nutrition (TPN)., Aim: This study was conducted to determine whether the inclusion of glutamine has a beneficial effect in patients with AP receiving TPN., Methods: In a randomized, controlled study 28 patients with AP received either a standard TPN with 1.5 g/kg body weight protein or an isonitrogen, isocaloric TPN which contains 0.3 g/kg L -alanine- L -glutamine. Patients were assessed for nutritional and inflammatory parameters, infectious complications, length of TPN, length of hospital stay (LOS) and cost of TPN., Results: There were no side-effects related to glutamine substitution observed. Glutamine was associated with a significant increase of cholinesterase, albumin and lymphocyte count in AP as well a decrease of C-reactive protein compared to standard TPN at day 14. There was a reduced length of TPN (10 [6-16] vs 16 [10-18] days, P<0.05) and a trend of reduced LOS (21 [14-32] vs 25 [19-40] days) in AP patients receiving glutamine. The overall cost per patient for TPN did not differ (gln+: 929+/-586 vs gln-: 981+/-507 euro/patient)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that glutamine substitution is beneficial and does not increase the overall cost of parenteral feeding in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Background: Total parenteral nutrition has a high cost and frequency of complications. Enteral feeding is a feasible alternative that can be started early in the postoperative period., Aim: To assess digestive tolerance to early enteral feeding in cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy and to compare early enteral feeding (EEF) with total parenteral nutrition plus enteral feeding (TPN + EF), initiated after overcoming postoperative ileus., Patients and Methods: Subjects with a resectable gastric cancer were considered eligible for the study. During surgery a nasoenteral tube was placed and patients were prospectively randomized to EEF or TPN + EF. Digestive tolerance, effectiveness, complications and costs between both modalities of nutritional support were compared., Results: Twenty eight patients (15 male, aged 63 +/- 14 years old) were studied. Fourteen patients were randomized to EEF and 14 to TPN + EF. Diarrhea occurred in 14 and 29% of EEF and TPN + EF patients respectively, (p: NS). Patients with TPN + EF received an average of 28 Cal/kg/day and 1.1 g/kg/day proteins. Patients with EEF received an average of 29 Cal/kg/day and 0.8 g/kg/day proteins. At the eighth postoperative day, serum albumin was 3.9 +/- 0.7 and 3.2 +/- 0.5 g/dl in EEF and TPN + EF patients respectively (p < 0.05), serum prealbumin was 16.9 +/- 5 and 12.3 +/- 4.3 mg/dl in EEF and TPN + EF patients respectively (p < 0.05) and nitrogen balance was +2.4 +/- 1.5 and -1.6 +/- 0.6 g/24 h in EEF and TPN + EF patients respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative hyperglycemia was observed with a lower frequency and nutritional support costs and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the EEF group., Conclusions: After total gastrectomy EEF is well tolerated, safe and effective, even during the early postoperative ileus. This therapeutic modality could be the first choice for nutritional support in these patients.

Objectives: The aims of this study were to define the indications for, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of, nutritional support in patients with acute pancreatitis., Methods: All admissions during the 12-month period from January through December 2000, were entered into a common management protocol consisting of an initial 48-h fast with i.v. fluids and analgesics. After 48 h, those patients who were improving were restarted on oral feeding (group O). The remaining patients were randomized to receive nasojejunal (group EN) or parenteral feeding (group TPN). The randomization study was continued until 50 patients had been accrued. Outcomes in the three groups were compared with respect to length of hospital stay, duration of feeding, complications, and hospital costs., Results: A total of 156 admissions were evaluated in the first 12 months. Of these, 87% patients had mild disease, 10% moderate, and 3% severe; 62% were related to alcohol abuse, 18% gallstones, and 8% idiosyncratic drug reactions. Of the patients, 75% improved on 48 h bowel rest and i.v. fluids, and were discharged within 4 days. The remainder were randomized to jejunal elemental (n = 26) or parenteral (n = 27) feeding. Duration of feeding was shorter with EN (6.7 vs 10.8 days, p < 0.05) and nutrition costs were lower, representing an average cost saving of $2362.00 per patient fed. EN was less effective in meeting estimated nutritional requirements (54 vs 88%, p < 0.0001), but metabolic (p < 0.003) and septic complications (p = 0.01) were lower. Subgroup analysis of patients with severe disease showed similar findings., Conclusion: Despite concerns that metabolic expenditure is increased and that food-stimulated pancreatic secretion might exacerbate the disease process, hypocaloric enteral feeding seems to be safer and less expensive than parenteral feeding and bowel rest in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Aim: Total parenteral nutrition can be administered with separate bottles or complete admixtures prepared by commercial firms, the hospital pharmacy, or hospital subcontractors. The aim of this study was to compare overall cost of total parenteral nutrition using different administration modes., Methods: Overall production costs of hospital parenteral admixtures were calculated from five expenditures (raw materials, consumable items, annual depreciation, control costs, staff costs). Cost for the other administration modes were evaluated for an identical formula. Time spent by nurses and the cost of connecting material was estimated to determine the overall cost for one day of parenteral nutrition., Results: Total cost was 46.04 euros/day with separate bottles, 50.61 euros/day for hospital preparations, 65.41 and 72.87 euros/day for industrial preparations and 82.02 euros/day for formulations prepared by subcontractors., Conclusion: Hospital preparations offer, for minimal outlay, an alternative for parenteral nutrition of much higher quality than the separate bottles method.

Introduction: A preliminary one-year review of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in the adult surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in view of its complications, cost and lack of consistent benefits in the critically ill., Materials and Methods: All the case records of patients receiving TPN in the SICU starting from first January to end December 1998 were studied., Results: Fifty patients received TPN during the study period. Four case records were unavailable. The indications for starting TPN were comparable with those set up by the Stanford University Hospital. Sepsis with gastrointestinal failure at 30.5% [95% CI, 17.7% to 45.8%] was one of the major indicators for TPN use and also the biggest contributor to mortality (50%) [95% CI, 35% to 65%]. Hyperglycaemia and line sepsis increased with duration of TPN use. Pneumonia, bacteraemia and wound infection peaked by the second week. Patients receiving TPN for inadequate and delayed enteral feeding fared better with 45.8% survival [95% CI, 30.9% to 61%]. None of the patients with polytrauma or malignancy cachexia died. 52.2% [95% CI, 37% to 67.1%] survived to be discharged from hospital. Caloric requirements were calculated using Harris-Benedect's equation and estimated using 30 to 35 kcal/kg/day. 64.3% were overfed and 50% received excessive non-protein calorie-to-nitrogen ratio. Ninety-eight per cent and 81% received less than the recommended amino-acid and glucose, respectively. Fifty-eight per cent received adequate lipids., Conclusion: This audit highlights the shortcomings in TPN prescription and characteristics of the attendant complications. Efforts must be directed towards encouraging uniformity and level of practice standards.

Background: No intravenous multivitamin formulation is available at the Chilean market that fulfills the requirements of pediatric patients on total parenteral nutrition. Therefore, adult formulations must be used., Aim: To prepare a parenteral aqueous multivitamin solution, to be used in pediatric patients., Material and Methods: The solution was prepared, mixing vitamins according to their stability and compatibility, in a horizontal laminar flow hood. The quality control for this formulation at times zero and 30 days consisted of an organoleptic analysis, microbiologic and pyrogen controls and vitamin quantification. In addition, the effect of vitamin solution incorporation on the stability of total parenteral nutrition formulae was evaluated. The approximated production cost was calculated., Results: The ampoules did not show changes on the organoleptic characteristics. No bacterial contamination or pyrogens were detected. Total parenteral nutrition solutions were not modified after the incorporation of the vitamins. The vitamin solution was stable for one month at 4 degrees C., Conclusions: The manufacture of this formulation results in significant savings, because it has a low manufacturing cost and fulfills pediatric requirements.

Objective: To evaluate the potential clinical, metabolic, and economic advantages of enteral nutrition over total parenteral nutrition., Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial., Setting: Department of surgery in a university hospital., Patients: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with cancer of the stomach (n = 121), pancreas (n = 110), or esophagus (n = 26) were randomized to receive postoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN group, n = 131) or early enteral nutrition (EEN group, n = 126). The nutritional goal was 25 kcal/kg/day. The two nutritional formulas were isocaloric and isonitrogenous, and they were continued until oral intake was at least 800 kcal/day., Measurements: Morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and treatment costs were evaluated in all patients. In 40 consecutive patients, selected nutritional, immunologic and inflammatory variables were studied. Moreover, intestinal oxygen tension was evaluated by micropolarographic implantable probes., Main Results: The nutritional goal was reached in 100/126 (79.3%) patients in the EEN group and in 128/131 (97.7%) patients in the TPN group (p <.001). In the EEN group, hyperglycemia (serum glucose, >200 mg/dL) was observed in 4.7% of the patients vs. 9.1% in the TPN group (p = NS). Alteration of serum electrolyte levels was 3.9% in the EEN group vs. 13.7% in the TPN group (p <.01). No significant difference was found in nutritional, immunologic, and inflammatory variables between the two groups. The overall complication rate was similar (40.4% for TPN vs. 35.7%, for EEN; p =.52). No difference was detected for either infectious or noninfectious complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. From postoperative day 5, intestinal oxygen tension recovered faster in the EEN group than in the TPN group (43 +/- 5 mm Hg vs. 31 +/- 4 mm Hg at day 7; p <.001). EEN was four-fold less expensive than TPN ($25 vs. $90.60/day, respectively)., Conclusion: EEN represents a rational alternative to TPN in patients who undergo upper gastrointestinal tract surgery for cancer and who clinically require postoperative artificial nutrition.

Background & Aims: Glutamine is recognized as a conditionally essential amino acid. Recent studies indicate that glutamine-containing total parenteral nutrition improves nitrogen economy, enhances gastrointestinal and immune functions and shortens hospital stay., Methods: Thirty-seven patients (19 w and 18 m; age 61. 4+/-10.4 years; BMI 23.7+/-2.8 kg/m(2)) following major abdominal surgery receiving an isonitrogenous isoenergetic TPN with or without alanyl-glutamine supplementation (0.5 g/kg BW/day), were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial over a five-day period by measuring nitrogen balance, selected biochemical parameters and length of hospital stay., Results: Supplemental alanyl-glutamine improved the overall mean (-3.5+/-1.6 vs. -5.5+/-1. 4 g N;P<0.05) and cumulative nitrogen balance (-14.1+/-9.1 vs. -21.7+/-11.4 g N;P<0.05) compared with the isonitrogenous, isoenergetic standard regimen. Alanyl-glutamine normalized plasma glutamine concentration and reduced the length of hospital stay (12.8+/-2.6 vs. 17.5+/-6.4 days;P<0.05)., Conclusions: The results of the study confirm that supplementation with synthetic alanyl-glutamine dipeptide is associated with cost containment due to shortened hospitalization and improved nitrogen economy., (Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.)

Background: Cost-containment pressures have adversely affected hospital nutrition support team staffing. We determined the effect of termination of a nutrition support nurse responsible for patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on quality assurance and financial indicators., Methods: A retrospective review of all 1,093 patients receiving TPN from fiscal year (FY) 1992 through FY 1998 in a tertiary care community hospital. We documented the changes in care during years when the nutrition support nurse position was staffed, terminated, and restored. Indicators studied included inappropriate TPN, central venous line sepsis, TPN wastage, and estimates of preventable costs., Results: When the nurse was present, 8.6% of TPN patients had a functional gastrointestinal (GI) tract and inappropriately received TPN compared with 12.1% when the nurse was absent, a risk difference of 3.5% points (95% confidence interval [CI], -.06 to 8.3; p = .069). Risk of TPN-associated line sepsis increased from 8.8% of patients when the nurse was present to 13.2% when the nurse was absent, a difference of 4.4% points (95% CI, 0.06 to 9.2; p = .028). In the absence of the nurse, 26.3% of TPN patients had preventable charges vs 17.5% when the nurse was present (p < .0001). Total preventable charges were higher in the years without a nurse (p < .003). Total preventable costs increased by $38,148 to $194,285 (depending on the estimate for sepsis) in the year after termination. Reinstatement of the nurse resulted in a decrease in costs between $34,485 and $156,654., Conclusions: Adequate staffing of a nutrition support team reduced inappropriate TPN and complications of TPN. Financial savings of the same order of magnitude as the nurse's compensation accompany substantial decreases in patient morbidity.

Optimal strategy for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) administration is essential both in terms of clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency. The aim of the present economic analysis was to provide a systematic and comprehensive cost comparison of the application of three currently available TPN systems: Separate Bottles (SB), Hospital-Compounded Bags (HCB) and Three-Compartment Bags (TCB). Sixty patients, admitted to the Geneva University Hospital and requiring TPN, were randomly assigned to one of the three systems. Three standard TPN formulas were prescribed to meet the patients' protein energy needs. TPN-related activities of medical, nursing and pharmacy staff were timed for the 24 hours of TPN administration. Manpower, nutrient solutions and medical supplies costs were calculated on the basis of mean Swiss salaries and hospital prices. TCB was the least expensive TPN system. SB and HCB systems' application costs were 120 and 150% of TCB cost, respectively. All intersystems cost comparisons were statistically significant (ANOVA p < or = 0.01). SB system required more items and manipulations, resulting in higher nurses manpower cost. Pharmacy overhead cost due to compounding was responsible for the higher cost of HCB system. Detailed manpower data presented in this study allow for an estimation of TPN application costs in other hospitals, using local salaries, specific product prices and compounding costs., (Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is typically delivered through catheters inserted into the superior vena cava (SVC) via a subclavian or internal jugular vein approach. A peripherally-inserted central venous catheter (PICC), utilizing a cephalic or basilic venous approach, may provide a safe alternative to the standard catheter approach and, because non-physician providers can insert the PICC, may introduce a potential cost-savings to health care institutions. We sought to determine if PICC lines are safer and more cost-effective than the standard central venous catheter approach for hospitalized patients who require TPN., Methods: One hundred and two hospitalized patients (age range, 18-88 years) who required TPN were prospectively randomized to receive therapy via a centrally-inserted subclavian catheter (n=51) or a peripherally-inserted PICC line (n=51). The primary end-point was the development of a complication requiring catheter removal. Other end-points included catheter infection and thrombophlebitis. Cost associated with insertion and maintenance of each catheter was also studied., Results: Complication-free delivery rate (without the need to remove or replace the catheter) was 67% for subclavian catheters and 46% for PICC lines (P<0.05). The overall infection rate was 4.9 per 1000 catheter days and was similar for each catheter type (P=0.68). PICC lines were associated with higher rates of clinically-evident thrombophlebitis (P<0.01), difficult insertion attempts (P<0.05), and malposition on insertion (P<0.05). No catheter complications resulted in significant long-term morbity or mortality. No significant difference was noted between the two catheter types in terms of aborted insertion attempts (P=0.18), dislodgement (P=0.12), or line occlusion (P=0.25). After standardizing costs for each hospital, the direct institutional costs for insertion and maintenance of PICC lines (US$22.32+/-2.74 per day) was greater than that for subclavian lines (US$16.20+/-2.96 per day;P<0.05)., Conclusion: PICC catheters have higher thrombophlebitis rates and are more difficult to insert into certain patients when compared to the standard subclavian approach for central venous access in hospitalized patients who require TPN. Because of this, PICCs may be less cost-effective than currently believed because of the difficulty in inserting and maintaining the catheter., (Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.)

Objective: We set out to determine the direct costs of hospitalizations of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis admitted to a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital and to contrast the costs of medical versus surgical inpatient care, Crohn's disease versus ulcerative colitis, and to identify dominant components of inpatient costs., Methods: We used a patient-specific case costing system at Saint Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, for fiscal years 1994 and 1995. We extracted all inpatients whose hospital discharge abstracts included ICD-9-CM codes 555 (Crohn's disease) and 556 (ulcerative colitis) among the top eight discharge diagnoses, and performed a chart review on all cases to ensure that the hospitalization was for inflammatory bowel disease and the diagnoses were accurate. We analyzed cases based on their disease diagnosis, primary mode of therapy associated with the hospitalization (medical vs surgical), and their major diagnosis-related group (DRG). This study evaluated direct patient care costs only and costs are expressed in Canadian dollars., Results: Of 362 hospital admissions, 325 were eligible and of these admissions 275 belonged to the digestive system DRGs. Seventy-one (37%) were admitted more than once during the 2 yr of the study, accounting for 202 (62%) of the total number of admissions. The mean cost per admission of all cases of Crohn's disease was $3,149 (95% confidence interval [CI], $2,665-$3,634) and for ulcerative colitis was $3,726 (95% CI $3,008-$4,445). Surgical therapy cases accounted for 49.8% of all admissions, 57.8% of all hospital days, and 60.5% of all costs. Patients treated surgically had more costly hospitalizations than those treated medically, particularly when analyzing only nontotal parenteral nutrition (TPN) cases. Surgical treatment admissions were significantly more costly for ulcerative colitis digestive DRG admissions than Crohn's disease. The nondigestive DRG admissions were more costly than the digestive DRGs in all categories although this was only statistically different among medically treated Crohn's disease. Patients treated medically were similarly costly whether they had Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. There was no significant difference in cost per admission among cases admitted multiple times, compared with those admitted only once. TPN cases accounted for 9.5% of cases but 27.1% of costs. TPN-associated hospitalizations were more costly than non-TPN-use hospitalizations but these costs were primarily driven by duration of stay rather than TPN use itself. For all cases, the top five cost categories in descending order were nursing unit bed-days, drugs and pharmacy, diagnostic lab tests, operating room, and diagnostic imaging and endoscopy., Conclusions: Using our system we could determine direct costs for inpatients with inflammatory bowel disease and the factors that determined increased costs. Medical therapy admissions were similarly costly between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis; however, surgical therapy admissions were costlier among ulcerative colitis patients. Admissions for nondigestive DRGs were more costly than those for digestive DRGs. TPN use identified a sicker group of patients who remained in the hospital longer than nonusers and, not surprisingly, these were the costliest patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics, resource use, and costs associated with hospitalization of Crohn's disease patients., Methods: All patients hospitalized at our institution from 7/1/96 to 6/30/97 with a primary diagnosis of "Crohn's Disease" were analyzed using a computerized database. Data are presented "per hospitalization.", Results: A total of 175 hospitalizations (147 patients) were identified. Mean patient age was 36.5 yr; 61% were female; 82% Caucasian. Payer mix was most commonly contracted (57%), commercial (21%), or Medicare (13%). 57% of hospitalizations had a primary surgical procedure; the remainder were medical. Average length of stay was 8.7 days (surgical, 9.6 days; medical, 7.5 days). The average cost of hospitalization, excluding physician fees, was $12,528 (surgical, $14,409; medical, $10,020), whereas average charges were $35,378 (surgical, $46,354; medical, $20,744), including physician fees, which averaged $7,249 (surgical, $11,217; medical, $1,959). Mean reimbursements were $21,968 (surgical, $28,946; medical, $12,666) with average weighted reimbursement rates of 60.17% of hospital charges, 69.57% of physician fees. The distribution of costs across subcategories was: Surgery (39.6%), Pharmacy (18.6%), Laboratory (3.8%), Radiology (2.1%), Pathology (0.8%), Endoscopy (0.3%), and Other Hospital Costs (34.9%). Of the hospitalizations, 87% included treatment with steroids, 23% with immunomodulators, and 14% with aminosalicylates; 27% included the administration of total parenteral nutrition, which accounted for 63% of the total pharmacy costs., Conclusions: Surgery accounts for the majority of hospitalizations, nearly 40% of their total costs, and 75% of overall charges and reimbursements. Therapy that decreases the number of surgical hospitalizations should substantially reduce inpatient Crohn's disease costs, as well as overall costs.

Purpose: To avoid the cost and complications of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), this study was initiated to determine the feasibility of administrating nasogastric tube feedings in children receiving intensive chemotherapy (CTX) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT)., Patients and Methods: Seventeen children (aged 2 to 19 years) were entered into the study. Continuous nasogastric feedings of a glutamine-supplemented elemental diet were administered during CTX and at the time of rehospitalization for fever, neutropenia, and mucositis., Results: Fourteen children were treated with CTX and 3 with BMT. Enteral tube feedings were administered for 216 days; each patient received a mean of 12.7 days. The tubes were generally well tolerated, and there were no instances of sinusitis or epistaxis. Six children received TPN in addition to enteral feedings. The hospital charges for the enteral feedings were $25,348, compared to $112,299 for the same number of days of TPN., Conclusions: Nasogastric tube insertion and enteral tube feedings in children receiving intensive CTX or BMT can be accomplished with minimal complications and significant cost savings when compared to TPN.