Search

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the best curative option for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of monosomal karyotype and/or complex karyotype abnormalities predicts inferior survival after allo-SCT in MDS patients. Haploidentical allo-SCT has been increasingly used in acute leukemia (AL) and has similar results as using HLA-matched donors, but data on higher-risk MDS is sparse. We compared outcomes in 266 patients with higher-risk MDS after HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 139) and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n = 48) from 2010 to 2019. Median donor age differed between the three groups (p p = 0.014). This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD (p = 0.014). The cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group (p = 0.051). However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32–1.07]; p = 0.080) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28–1.11]; p = 0.094). MUD do not remain a significant positive predictor of survival, suggesting that beyond the donor-recipient HLA matching, the donor age might impact recipient outcome.

International audience; BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome . We retrospectively compared patient outcomes after allo-HSCT according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen.Patients and MethodsThree conditioning regimens were compared in 427 patients allografted for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), fludarabine (150-160 mg/m2) and busulfan (6.4 mg/kg); sequential FLAMSA-RIC, fludarabine, amsacrine, and aracytine followed by RIC; and myeloablative with reduced toxicity (RTC), fludarabine and busulfan (9.6 mg/kg or 12.8 mg/kg).ResultsThe patients in the 3 conditioning groups were different in regards to the number of treatment lines (P< .001), percentage of blasts in bone marrow (P< .001), and disease status at transplantation (P< .001). No significant differences in outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, and graft versus host disease relapse-free survival) were observed between the 3 groups. Using propensity score analysis to overcome baseline imbalances, we compared 70 patients receiving FLAMSA-RIC to 260 patients receiving RIC, and compared 83 patients receiving RTC to 252 patients receiving RIC. The only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was cytogenetic risk at transplantation. After the covariate adjustment using propensity score to reduce baseline imbalances, the only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was still cytogenetic risk at transplantation.ConclusionOverall survival appears to be similar with the 3 conditioning regimens. The only factor influencing survival is cytogenetic risk at transplantation, suggesting that new promising drugs in the conditioning and/or early interventions after transplantation are needed to improve outcomes in these patients.

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Unfortunately, it is still associated with a significant risk of relapse due to mechanisms of escape from the control of alloreactive T cells. Repetitive adjuvant donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), termed prophylactic DLI (proDLI), as an effective strategy in preventing relapse is still debated. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of proDLI in allografted AML and MDS. We identified 56 patients treated with proDLI (DLI planned in full chimeras without any sign of disease relapse) and matched them to 167 patients in control group, (DLI performed for mixed chimerism or positive minimal residual disease) based on similar age, initial disease, cytogenetic prognosis, and conditioning intensity. Results: In univariate analysis, the incidence of severe aGVHD at 100 days and incidence of all grades of chronic GVHD 1 year after allo-HSCT were similar in the two groups. We also observed a trend of higher 3-year RI (52.61% [95% confidence interval 25.99-79.23]) in the proDLI group versus the control group (29.31% [20.28-38.34], p=0.067). However, 3-year overall survival (p=0.892), progression-free survival (p=0.239), and non-relapse mortality (p=0.343) were similar between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was anti-thymocyte globulin administration during the conditioning regimen. Discussion/Conclusion: The proDLI strategy had an acceptable toxicity profile but did not improve patient outcomes compared to the pre-emptive strategy.

Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning. The DEFIFrance post-marketing registry study evaluated effectiveness and safety in patients who received defibrotide. It collected retrospective/prospective patient data from 53 French HCT centres from July 2014 to March 2020. Primary endpoints were survival and complete response (CR; total serum bilirubin

Medication non-adherence (NA) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can lead to serious complications. This study assesses NA in French adult and pediatric recipients and identifies factors associated with NA. In accordance with the EMERGE and STROBE guidelines, a cross sectional multicentric survey was conducted. We used a self-reported questionnaire that was adapted to adults and pediatrics and that could provide a picture of all three phases of medication adherence: initiation, implementation, persistence. We enrolled 242 patients, 203 adults (mean age: 51 years old, 50.7% male) and 39 children (mean age: 9 years old, 56.4% female). Reported NA was estimated at about 75% in both populations, adults and pediatrics. In adults, the univariate analysis showed that patients less than 50 years old (P = 0.041), (i) treated with cyclosporine (P = 0.02), (ii) treated with valacyclovir/acyclovir (P = 0.016), and (iii) experiencing side effects (P = 0.009), were significantly more non-adherent. In multivariate analysis, only recipient age was significantly associated to NA (P = 0.05). The limited size of the pediatric population did not allow us to draw any statistical conclusion about this population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in France on NA in allo-HCT recipients. Our results highlight the age factor as the only factor related to NA. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations and refine results in pediatric populations, currently most at risk of medication NA.

Summary Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce side-effects such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which often require intensive care unit admission. The aim of this study was to describe management of critically ill CAR T-cell recipients in intensive care. Methods This international, multicentre, observational cohort study was done in 21 intensive care units in France, Spain, the USA, the UK, Russia, Canada, Germany, and Austria. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had received CAR T-cell therapy in the past 30 days; and had been admitted to intensive care for any reason. Investigators retrospectively included patients admitted between Feb 1, 2018, and Feb 1, 2019, and prospectively included patients admitted between March 1, 2019, and Feb 1, 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were extracted from medical records. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Factors associated with mortality were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model. Findings 942 patients received CAR T-cell therapy, of whom 258 (27%) required admission to intensive care and 241 (26%) were included in the analysis. Admission to intensive care was needed within median 4·5 days (IQR 2·0–7·0) of CAR T-cell infusion. 90-day mortality was 22·4% (95% CI 17·1–27·7; 54 deaths). At initial evaluation on admission, isolated cytokine release syndrome was identified in 101 patients (42%), cytokine release syndrome and ICANS in 93 (39%), and isolated ICANS in seven (3%) patients. Grade 3–4 cytokine release syndrome within 1 day of admission to intensive care was found in 50 (25%) of 200 patients and grade 3–4 ICANS in 38 (35%) of 108 patients. Bacterial infection developed in 30 (12%) patients. Life-saving treatments were used in 75 (31%) patients within 24 h of admission to intensive care, primarily vasoactive drugs in 65 (27%) patients. Factors independently associated with 90-day mortality by multivariable analysis were frailty (hazard ratio 2·51 [95% CI 1·37–4·57]), bacterial infection (2·12 [1·11–4·08]), and lifesaving therapy within 24 h of admission (1·80 [1·05–3·10]). Interpretation Critical care management is an integral part of CAR T-cell therapy and should be standardised. Studies to improve infection prevention and treatment in these high-risk patients are warranted. Funding Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Reanimation Onco-Hematologique.

Resume Introduction L’allogreffe de cellules souches hematopoietiques est la seule therapeutique curative pour de nombreuses hemopathies. Ce traitement peut donner lieu a des complications, notamment ophtalmologiques. Methodes Nous avons realise une revue de la litterature et nous avons etabli des recommandations accessibles et pratiques pour les hematologues et les ophtalmologues. Resultats Le suivi ophtalmologique doit etre systematique chez les patients ayant eu une allogreffe, par l’interrogatoire de l’hematologue et l’examen de l’ophtalmologue. Les complications liees a la reaction du greffon contre l’hote (GVHD) et non liees a la GVHD sont listees, ainsi que les differentes therapeutiques. Discussion Le depistage et le traitement des complications ophtalmologiques de l’allogreffe necessitent une collaboration etroite entre hematologues et ophtalmologues. La prise en charge par des soignants formes dans ce type de pathologie est recommandee.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) represents the most beneficial treatment for patients with active relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. Recently, sequential regimens combining debulking chemotherapy followed by reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) have shown encouraging results for these patients. In this retrospective study, we report the extended results of a sequential regimen of clofarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and RIC in 131 adults with active R/R myeloid disease at transplant. Conditioning consisted of clofarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cytosine arabinoside (1 g/m2/day) for 5 days, followed, after a rest of 3 days, by an RIC combining cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) for 1 day, iv busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day) for 2 days, and anti-thymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 2 days. Between 2007 and 2016, 131 patients (males n = 75, median age: 52.6 years) were identified from the SFGM-TC registry. There were 111 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 20 cases with myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndrome. Status at transplant was known for all but 4 patients and was primary refractory (n = 81) and 1st or 2nd relapse (n = 46). All patients received allo-SCT from a matched donor (sibling n = 64, unrelated n = 67). Engraftment was observed in 105/122 (86%) evaluable cases and 63% of the patients achieved complete remission (CR) after transplant. The 1-year overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival were 39.2%, 28.1%, 41.0%, 30.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. This study confirms that this sequential clofarabine-based regimen provides a high CR rate in this critical population, although relapse remains a matter of concern.

International audience; Introduction Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major source of mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Standard 1st line therapy for the treatment of aGvHD involves corticosteroids (CS). However, more than 50% of patients are refractory to CS (SR-aGvHD) and the associated mortality rate is of up to 80%. Recently, Ruxolitinib has been approved as 2nd line treatment for SR-aGvHD. However, patients with severe gastrointestinal (GI) aGvHD seem less likely to respond to Ruxolitinib and have poor outcomes with limited therapeutic options.In this context, fecal microbiotherapy has shown promising results in several pilot studies in patients with refractory GI-aGvHD. Here we report clinical outcomes from 81 patients diagnosed with SR or dependent (SD) GI-aGvHD treated with the pooled allogeneic microbiotherapy MaaT013 as part of the Early Access Program (EAP) in France.Methods 81 patients with SR/SD GI-aGvHD (Classical n=62, late onset n=12, overlap syndrome n=7) were treated with MaaT013 as part of an EAP in France. These patients had failed 1 to 6 prior systemic GvHD treatment lines (median 2; 66/81 received Ruxolitinib). Most patients had grade III-IV aGvHD (11% grade II, 51% grade III, 38% grade IV).For each patient, a total of 3 MaaT013 administrations were planned every 7 +/- 2 days. Each dose comprised 30g of feces in 150 mL of diluent, from 4 to 8 healthy donors, administered by enema (except for 1 patient by nasogastric tube).Treatment response was calculated among all treated patients based on aGvHD staging and grading at day 28 (D28) at the time of the EAP request.Results At D28, the GI-overall response rate (ORR) was 56%: 30 complete response (CR, 37%), 11 very good response rate (VGPR, 14%), 4 partial response (PR, 5%). The GI-ORR was higher in patients with lower grade aGvHD (89% in grade II, 66% in grade III, 32% in grade IV) and higher in SD versus SR patients (92% versus 49%). Including skin and liver symptoms (n=78), response rate was 49%, including 24 CR, 11 VGPR and 3 PR and inversely correlated with aGvHD initial grade (88% in grade II, 55% in grade III, 30% in grade IV).Overall survival (OS) was 51% at 6 months (M6) and 39% at M12. The median follow-up among surviving patients was 355 days (range, 53-731). OS was significantly higher in patients achieving at least GI-PR at D28 (Responder, R; n=45) compared to patients in treatment failure (Non-responder, NR; n=35): 69% versus 28% at M6, 59% versus 14% at M12, respectively. Median survival duration in R was 451 days versus 32 days in NR.Interestingly, aGvHD response was improved in the subgroup of 31 patients previously treated with Ruxolitinib as 2nd line and MaaT013 as 3rd line (65% D28 GI-ORR, OS M6 55% and 49% M12 and 74% versus 15% at M6 and 74% versus 0% at M12 for R and NR respectively).MaaT013 displayed a good overall safety profile in the EAP population: 20 pharmacovigilance cases were reported in 18 patients: sepsis in 11 patients, C. difficile colitis in 2, E. coli osteoarthritis in 1, G. silvicola in stools from 1, P. aeruginosa sinusitis in 1, appearance of air bubbles in the mesorectum in 1, respiratory distress in 1. No pathogen transmission was reported. In 2 patients, non-pathogenic commensal bacteria isolated following infectious events were detected in the administered MaaT013 batch. Causality could not be formally excluded in these cases.The overall incidence of bacteremia (14%) remains low, compared to an incidence of 31% to 74% in bloodstream infections reported in patients with GI-aGvHD. This suggests that fecal microbiotherapy may have a protective effect on bacterial translocation, but this needs to be confirmed in further clinical trials.47 deaths have been reported; the cause of which was GvHD in 21 patients, severe infection in 13, relapse of underlying malignancy in 6, COVID-19 in 3, hemorrhage during surgery in 1, neurological complications post allo-HCT in 1, and cardiac arrest in 2 patients. No causality link with MaaT013 administration has been identified.Conclusion Overall, EAP clinical data showed that MaaT013 was safe and effective for the treatment of SR/SD-GI-aGvHD especially in patients having previously received ruxolitinib. Interestingly, GI-response to aGvHD correlates with increased OS, suggesting a strong favorable benefit-risk profile for MaaT013. A Phase 3 trial is currently ongoing to confirm these results in ruxolitinib-refractory patients (NCT04769895).

Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can lead to early cardiac complications as well as late sequelae. A cardiac evaluation is essential in the pre-transplant assessment given the patient's comorbidities and previous chemotherapy treatments received. Various thresholds of cardiac function are recommended as eligibility criteria. The rise of haplo-identical transplantation with the use of post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) as a prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is accompanied by a resurgence of cardiological concerns. Arrhythmias are also a concern and the list of drugs implicated in this complication is growing. The rare occurrence of cardiac GVHD has been reported, although the entity is not well defined. Finally, although long-term follow-up recommendations exist, they are not accompanied by specific targets for cardiovascular risk factors, the presence of which is nevertheless increased after HSCT. In the framework of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) practice harmonization workshops held in Lille in September 2019, the prophylaxis, the diagnostic approach and the treatments of cardiac complication following HSCT were reviewed after analysis of published studies.

CD19-directed CAR T-cells have been remarkably successful in treating patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and transformed follicular lymphoma (t-FL). In this cohort study, we treated 60 patients with axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel. Complete and partial metabolic responses (CMR/PMR) were obtained in 40% and 23% of patients, respectively. After 6.9 months of median follow-up, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were estimated at 3.1 and 12.3 months, respectively. Statistical analyses revealed that CMR, PFS, and OS were all significantly associated with age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI, p &lt, 0.05). T-cell subset phenotypes in the apheresis product tended to correlate with PFS. Within the final product, increased percentages of both CD4 and CD8 CAR+ effector memory cells (p = 0.02 and 0.01) were significantly associated with CMR. Furthermore, higher CMR/PMR rates were observed in patients with a higher maximal in vivo expansion of CAR T-cells (p = 0.05) and lower expression of the LAG3 and Tim3 markers of exhaustion phenotype (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04). Thus, we find that aaIPI at the time of infusion, phenotype of the CAR T product, in vivo CAR T-cell expansion, and low levels of LAG3/Tim3 are associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in DLBCL patients.

Purpose: Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the first cause of transplant failure in patients with Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In other hematologic malignancies, therapeutic advances resulted in significant improvement over time in survival of patients relapsing after transplant. Experimental Design: We compared outcomes at European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) participating centers of 899 adult patients with Ph+ ALL who relapsed between 2000 and 2019 after allo-HCT performed in first complete remission. Median follow-up for alive patients was 56 months. Results: Overall, 116 patients relapsed between 2000 and 2004, 225 between 2005 and 2009, 294 between 2010 and 2014, and 264 between 2015 and 2019. Patient and transplant characteristics were similar over the four time periods except for a progressive increase in unrelated donors, peripheral blood stem cells, reduced intensity conditioning, and in vivo T-cell depletion and a progressive decrease in total body irradiation. The 2-year overall survival (OS) after relapse increased from 27.8% for patients relapsing between 2000 and 2004 to 54.8% for 2015 and 2019 (P = 0.001). A second allo-HCT within 2 years after relapse was performed in 13.9% of patients resulting in a 2-year OS of 35.9%. In multivariate analysis, OS from relapse was positively affected by a longer time from transplant to relapse and the year of relapse. Conclusions: We observed a major progressive improvement in OS from posttransplant relapse for patients with Ph+ ALL over the years, likely multifactorial including transplant-related factors, posttransplant salvage, and improvement in supportive care. These large-scale real-world data can serve as a benchmark for future studies in this setting. See related commentary by Gale, p. 813

This prospective, observational, multicenter study evaluated the real-world incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) during and after micafungin prophylaxis in France. Patients with a hematological malignancy/solid tumor received micafungin prophylaxis according to usual clinical practice and were followed for 3 months. Primary endpoint was breakthrough IFI incidence during prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints included the identification of IFI risk factors, IFI incidence during follow-up, and adverse events (AEs). One hundred and fifty patients (55 children, 95 adults) were enrolled. Micafungin prophylaxis was initiated at 50 mg in adults and at a median 1.01 mg/kg (range: 0.6–2.2) in children. Fifteen patients (10%) experienced an IFI during prophylaxis. IFI breakthrough occurred in 15% children, 7% adults, 3.1% allogeneic transplant patients, 8.7% acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, 7.0% other patients (never allotransplanted/non-AML/MDS). Nineteen patients (12.7%) experienced an IFI during 3-month follow-up. Micafungin was well tolerated with few treatment-related AEs, supporting its use in this patient population in France.

Cancer cell growth is associated with immune surveillance failure. Nowadays, restoring the desired immune response against cancer cells remains a major therapeutic strategy. Due to the recent advances in biological knowledge, efficient therapeutic tools have been developed to support the best bio-clinical approaches for immune precision therapy. One of the most important successes in immune therapy is represented by the applicational use of monoclonal antibodies, particularly the use of rituximab for B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. More recently, other monoclonal antibodies have been developed, to inhibit immune checkpoints within the tumor microenvironment that limit immune suppression, or to enhance some immune functions with immune adjuvants through different targets such as Toll-receptor agonists. The aim is to inhibit cancer proliferation by the diminishing/elimination of cancer residual cells and clinically improving the response duration with no or few adverse effects. This effect is supported by enhancing the number, functions, and activity of the immune effector cells, including the natural killer (NK) lymphocytes, NKT-lymphocytes, γδ T-lymphocytes, cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, directly or indirectly through vaccines particularly with neoantigens, and by lowering the functions of the immune suppressive cells. Beyond these new therapeutics and their personalized usage, new considerations have to be taken into account, such as epigenetic regulation particularly from microbiota, evaluation of transversal functions, particularly cellular metabolism, and consideration to the clinical consequences at the body level. The aim of this review is to discuss some practical aspects of immune therapy, giving to clinicians the concept of immune effector cells balancing between control and tolerance. Immunological precision medicine is a combination of modern biological knowledge and clinical therapeutic decisions in a global vision of the patient.

International audience; The association of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has increased in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Nevertheless, the use of CsA or CsA+MMF has not been reported in a large and uniform cohort. We analyzed 497 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission (CR) who underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients received a fludarabine busulfan RIC regimen and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with either CsA alone or in combination with MMF. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 27% (95% CI 21-33%) for CsA and 33% (95% CI 27-38%) for CsA+MMF (p = 0.25). The 2-year CI of chronic GvHD was 38% (95% CI 31-45%) and 33% (95% CI 28-39%) for the CsA and the CsA+MMF group, respectively (p = 0.26). On multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences with respect to relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), acute and chronic GvHD were found between the two groups, also when conducting a subgroup analysis in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) recipients. Our results support the importance of randomized trial to identify patients who could benefit from the addition of MMF in MUD HSCT.

We compared transplant outcomes of 708 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation using thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (TBF) conditioning with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy), to 2083 patients receiving matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) conditioning and in vivo T-cell depletion. For intermediate cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), multivariate analysis revealed that haplo-TBF significantly increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.1; p = 0.0006) but did not affect relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). For high cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in CR1, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.7; p = 0.02), decreased RI (HR = 0.45; p = 0.03) but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. For AML transplanted in CR2, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.36; p = 0.008), decreased RI (HR = 0.38; p = 0.005), but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. Finally, for AML patients transplanted with active disease, haplo-TBF had no influence on transplant outcomes. In conclusion, compared to MUD-FB, haplo-TBF increased NRM, reduced RI in high-risk AML in CR, resulting in similar LFS, OS, and GRFS. These results comparing two different approaches support the use of a haploidentical family donor for high-risk AML patients lacking a matched sibling donor.

The benefit of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged >60 years remains a matter of debate, notably when performed in first complete remission (CR1). To clarify this issue, the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) performed a 10-year real-world time-dependent analysis. The study enrolled patients between 60 and 70 years of age with AML in CR1 after intensive chemotherapy with intermediate (IR) or unfavorable (UR) risk according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2010 classification. The impact of allo-HSCT was analyzed through three models: (1) time-dependent Cox; (2) multistate for dynamic prediction; and (3) super landmark. The study enrolled 369 (73%) IR and 138 (27%) UR patients with AML, 203 of whom received an allo-HSCT. Classical multivariate analysis showed that allo-HSCT significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.47 [0.35-0.62]; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR [95% CI], 0.56 [0.42-0.76]; P < .001), independently of the ELN risk group. With the multistate model, the predicted 5-year probability for IR and UR patients to remain in CR1 without allo-HSCT was 8% and 1%, respectively. Dynamic predictions confirmed that patients without allo-HSCT continue to relapse over time. Finally, the super landmark model showed that allo-HSCT significantly improved RFS (HR [95% CI], 0.47 [0.36-0.62]; P < .001) and OS (HR [95% CI], 0.54 [0.40-0.72]; P < .001). allo-HSCT in CR1 is reported here as significantly improving the outcome of fit older patients with AML. Long-term RFS without allo-HSCT is very low (

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and cord blood transplantation (CBT) are valid alternatives for patients without a fully human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. Here, we compared the allo-HCT outcomes of CBT versus single-allele-mismatched MMUD allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in acute myeloid leukemia. Methods Patients who underwent a first CBT without PTCy (N = 902) or allo-HCT from a (HLA 9/10) MMUD with PTCy (N = 280) were included in the study. A multivariate regression analysis was performed for the whole population. A matched-pair analysis was carried out by propensity score-based 1:1 matching of patients (177 pairs) with known cytogenetic risk. Results The incidence of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 6 months was 36% versus 32% (p = 0.07) and 15% versus 11% (p = 0.16) for CBT and MMUD cohorts, respectively. CBT was associated with a higher incidence of graft failure (11% vs. 4%, p p p p = 0.05), which resulted in worse leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.34–2.12, p p p p = 0.052) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.69) did not differ significantly between the cohorts. These results were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. Conclusions CBT was associated with lower LFS, OS, and GRFS due to higher NRM, compared to MMUD allo-HCT with PTCy. In the absence of a fully matched donor, 9/10 MMUD with PTCy may be preferred over CBT.

International audience

The value of pretransplant splenectomy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is subject to debate, since the procedure may preclude subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To determine the impact of pretransplant splenectomy on the incidence of allo-HCT, we conducted a comprehensive retrospective study of all patients with MF for whom an unrelated donor search had been initiated via the French bone marrow transplantation registry (RFGM) between 1 January 2008 and 1 January 2017. Additional data were collected from the patients' medical files and a database held by the French-Language Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy (SFGM-TC). We used a multistate model with four states ("RFGM registration"; "splenectomy"; "death before allo-HCT", and "allo-HCT") to evaluate the association between splenectomy and the incidence of allo-HCT. The study included 530 patients from 57 centers. With a median follow-up time of 6 years, we observed 81 splenectomies, 99 deaths before allo-HCT (90 without splenectomy and nine after), and 333 allo-HCTs (268 without splenectomy and 65 after). In a bivariable analysis, the hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the association of splenectomy with allo-HCT was 7.2 [5.1-10.3] in the first 4 months and 1.18 [0.69-2.03] thereafter. The hazard ratio [95% CI] for death associated with splenectomy was 1.58 [0.79-3.14]. These reassuring results suggest that splenectomy does not preclude allo-HCT in patients with MF.

International audience; Stomatological complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are frequent and very uncomfortable for patients. The primary complication is the graft versus host disease reaction. Other side effects of the procedure include infections, taste disorders and carcinogenic risks. Various local treatments are used but remain imperfect. Within the framework of the 10th workshop of practice harmonization of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held in Lille in September 2019, diagnostic approaches and treatments of tongue and oral complications following allogeneic HSCT were reviewed according to the analysis of published studies.

International audience; We report the results of the French Temporary Authorization of Use (ATU) compassionate program of letermovir for primary prophylaxis conducted in 21 transplant centers. Patients were CMV seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients and at high risk for CMV infection. Primary prophylaxis was defined as initiation of letermovir between day 0 and day +28 post-transplant. Between November 2017 and January 2019, 96 patients with a median age of 56 years received letermovir and follow-up data were available for 78 patients. The median time from transplant to letermovir initiation was 4 days, and the median duration of exposure to letermovir was 78 days, with 57 patients still on treatment at the cutoff date. Letermovir was temporarily discontinued in 4 patients (5.1%) and stopped in 39 patients (50.0%), in most cases due to planned end of treatment (n = 16, 20.5%). Fifteen patients (19.2%) each presented one positive CMV PCR, in median 13 days after letermovir initiation. Clinically significant CMV infection was reported in 5 patients (6.4%). No CMV disease was reported. At least one adverse drug reaction was reported for 12 patients (15.4%). In this early access program, letermovir was effective with comparable results of the phase 3 study with a low rate of clinically significant CMV infection, including in patients who were at high-risk for CMV infection.

Antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is recommended by international guidelines for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Nonetheless, treatment of breakthrough fungal infections remains challenging. This observational, prospective, multicentre, non-comparative study of patients undergoing myelosuppressive and intensive chemotherapy for AML who are at high-risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), describes AFP management and outcomes for 404 patients (65.6% newly diagnosed and 73.3% chemotherapy na&iuml, ve). Ongoing chemotherapy started 1.0 &plusmn, 4.5 days before inclusion and represented induction therapy for 79% of participants. In 92.3% of patients, posaconazole was initially prescribed, and 8.2% of all patients underwent at least one treatment change after 17 &plusmn, 24 days, mainly due to medical conditions influencing AFP absorption (65%). The mean AFP period was 24 &plusmn, 32 days, 66.8% stopped their prophylaxis after the high-risk period and 31.2% switched to a non-prophylactic treatment (2/3 empirical, 1/3 pre-emptive/curative). Overall, 9/404 patients (2.2%) were diagnosed with probable or proven IFDs. During the follow-up, 94.3% showed no signs of infection. Altogether, 20 patients (5%) died, and three deaths (0.7%) were IFD-related. In conclusion, AFP was frequently prescribed and well tolerated by these AML patients, breakthrough infections incidence and IFD mortality were low and very few treatment changes were required.

In order to identify cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients who are at risk of developing CMV infection following first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), we built up a scoring system based on patient/donor characteristics and transplantation modalities. To this end, 3690 consecutive patients were chronologically divided into a derivation cohort (2010-2012, n = 2180) and a validation cohort (2013-2014, n = 1490). Haploidentical donors were excluded. The incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or CMV viremia leading to preemptive treatment) at 1, 3, and 6 months in the derivation cohort was 13.8%, 38.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. CMV-seropositive donor, unrelated donor (HLA matched 10/10 or HLA mismatched 9/10), myeloablative conditioning, total body irradiation, antithymocyte globulin, and mycophenolate mofetil significantly and independently affected the incidence of 3-month infection. These six factors were selected to build up the prognostic model. Four risk groups were defined: low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk categories, with a 3-month predicted incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection in the derivation cohort of 22.2%, 31.1%, 45.4%, and 56.9%, respectively. This score represents a framework for the evaluation of patients who are at risk of developing clinically significant CMV infection following allo-HCT. Prospective studies using this score may be of benefit in assessing the value of anti-CMV prophylaxis in well-defined patient cohorts.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29&ndash, 48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29&ndash, 47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI.

BackgroundPeripheral T cell lymphomas form a heterogeneous group with a usually dismal prognostic. The place of allogeneic stem cell transplantation to treat PTCL is debated.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse, and transplant-related mortality (TRM) and associated variables in 285 adults with non-primary cutaneous PTCL (PCTL-NOS (39%), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphomas (29%), anaplastic T cell lymphomas (15%), and other subtypes (17%)), who received alloSCT in 34 centers between 2006 and 2014.ResultsAlloSCT was given as part of front-line therapy (n= 138) to 93 patients in first complete response (CR) and 45 in first partial response (PR), and of salvage therapy (n= 147) to 116 patients for second or more CR/PR and 31 for progressive disease. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was given to 172 patients (62%), while 107 (38%) received myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The median follow-up was 72.4 months. The 2- and 4-year OS were 65% and 59%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 18% after 1 year and 19% after 2 years. TRM was 21% at 1 year, 24% after 2 years, and 28% after 4 years. In multivariate analysis, grade III–IV acute GvHD (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.53–4.31;p= 0.00036), low Karnofsky score < 80% (HR = 5.14, 95% CI 2.02–13.06;p= 0.00058), and progressive disease status before transplant (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.25–3.89;p =0.0062) were significantly associated with a reduced OS.ConclusionsThe data demonstrate in the largest retrospective cohort of non-cutaneous PTCL so far reported that alloSCT after RIC or MAC is an effective strategy, even in chemoresistant patients.

Letermovir potently inhibits the cytomegalovirus (CMV)-terminase complex. Letermovir primary prophylaxis given for the first 3 months after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been shown to reduce clinically significant CMV infection and is well tolerated. Until now, only case reports or small retrospective series have been published on the use of letermovir for a secondary prophylaxis (SP) of CMV infection or diseases after HCT. Here we report the outcome of 80 consecutive CMV-seropositive adult patients included in the French compassionate program and who received letermovir as a SP after at least 1 CMV episode (infection or disease) since HCT. Letermovir was initiated at a median of 170 (49 to 1829) days after transplant and given orally for a median of 118 (26 to 396) days at the usual daily dose of 480 mg once daily and adjusted to 240 mg once daily when coadministered with cyclosporine. The donors were seronegative in 53% of the cases. Fifty patients had a current or previous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 14 had experienced CMV disease since transplant. Four (5.5%) patients developed CMV breakthrough infections (n = 1) or diseases (n = 3) after the initiation of letermovir. In 3 of these 4 patients, further investigation of virologic resistance showed a CMV UL56 mutation C325Y or W, conferring the high-level letermovir resistance. One or more adverse reactions were declared by the local investigator in 15 (19%) patients. Only 2 patients stopped letermovir SP because of an adverse reaction (pruritus, 1; cytopenia, 1). In our experience, letermovir given as a SP may prevent a new CMV reactivation in a high-risk patient population and can be administered for several weeks, providing a bridge between the pre-emptive or therapeutic treatment of a CMV episode and CMV-specific immune reconstitution, giving time for tapering immunosuppressants. Prospective studies are required to confirm these results.

Stomatological complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are frequent and very uncomfortable for patients. The primary complication is the graft versus host disease reaction. Other side effects of the procedure include infections, taste disorders and carcinogenic risks. Various local treatments are used but remain imperfect. Within the framework of the 10th workshop of practice harmonization of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held in Lille in September 2019, diagnostic approaches and treatments of tongue and oral complications following allogeneic HSCT were reviewed according to the analysis of published studies.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the only curative therapy for hematological disorders. This treatment can lead to complications, of which ophtalmological involvement.We reviewed the literature and established accessible and convenient recommendations for hematologists and ophthalmologists.Ophtalmological follow-up should be done in every patient having had an allogeneic transplantation, by the hematologist questioning and by the ophthalmologist physical exam. Complications due to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or not due to GVHD are cited, as well as therapeutic options.Screening and treatment of ophthalmologic complications in allogeneic stem cells transplantation recipients requires a close collaboration between hematologists and ophthalmologists. The management of these patients by caregivers trained in these questions is encouraged.

Background. Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T cells) is a new therapeutic approach approved for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-lymphoproliferative malignancies. Specific toxicities have been described following CAR-T cells therapy, mainly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Coagulation disorders have been described in patients experiencing CRS. However, data is scarce regarding such consequences. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated patients treated with CAR T-cells for R/R B-cell lymphoma in our tertiary hospital between 2019, January 1 st and 2021, March 1 st. Post-infusion coagulation disorders were assessed, as well as factors associated with such anomalies using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results. During the study period, 64 patients received CAR T-cell therapy for R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=52, 81%), transformed follicular lymphoma (n=9, 14%) and mantel cell lymphoma (n=3, 5%).The median follow-up was 7.98 months (IQR 4.24; 12.39). All patients had a normal coagulation panel at CAR-T cells infusion. The incidence of CRS was 92% (n=59; grade 3-4 n=2, 3%) and ICANS 38% (n=24; grade 3-4 n=7; 11%). We observed a decrease in fibrinogen level in all patients (grade 3-4 n=44, 69%), occurring at day 11 (median) post-infusion, prolonged prothrombin time (PT) in 27 patients (42%, grade 3-4 n=0), at day 4 (median), and thrombocytopenia in 62 patients (97%, grade 3-4 n=46, 72%) at day 1 (median). By multivariate analysis, fibrinogen below 2 g/L after CAR-T cells infusion was independently associated with CRS grade 2 or greater (OR 58.4; 95%CI [5.8-4212.8] p = 0.009), ICANS grade 2 or greater (OR 2.36; 95%CI [2.2-80.6] p = 0.007) and day-0 lymphocyte count (OR 0.32 per 0.1 G/L; 95%CI [0.10-0.89] p = 0.037). However, it was not associated with comorbidities, disease history, tumor burden, CAR product, or outcomes. Furthermore, by the end of the study, 5 patients (8%) did not recover a normal fibrinogen level and 41 (64%) did not recover a normal platelet count. Others recovered a normal fibrinogen level within a median of 69 days, a normal platelet count within a median of 15 days, and a normal PT within in a median of 7 days. Interestingly, no significant thrombotic or hemorrhagic events were recorded for those patients. Conclusion. A high incidence of asymptomatic coagulation disorders was observed after CAR-T cell therapy, notably prolonged hypofibrinogenemia. Further studies should focus on the mechanisms involved in such abnormalities. Disclosures Lamure: Janssen: Other: miscellaneous support , Research Funding; Gilead: Other: miscellaneous support ; Roche: Other: miscellaneous support ; Abbvie: Other: miscellaneous support ; Sanofi: Other: miscellaneous support ; Novartis: Other: miscellaneous support ; Pfizer: Other: miscellaneous support ; Actelion: Other: miscellaneous support . Paul: NOVARTIS: Other: BOARD; SERVIER: Other: BOARD. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Herbaux: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria.

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib, a JAK-inhibitor, has been approved in myelofibrosis patients and is effective to alleviate symptoms of the disease in a substantial proportion of patients. In a French phase 2 study, the use of ruxolitinib as a bridge to HSCT was followed by a high transplantation rate, with one third of patients presenting clinical improvement before HSCT (partial response or spleen size reduction) (BMT 2021, Robin et al). The aim of the current study is to compare post-transplantation outcomes between patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT and those who did not. Methods: This retrospective study includes patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis registered in the SFGM-TC registry including patients from France, Belgium and Switzerland. Patients who received HSCT between July 2010 and December 2019 with available information regarding ruxolitinib treatment were included. The impact of ruxolitinib was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression and a propensity score. Results: 305 patients could be included, of whom 143 received ruxolitinib prior to HSCT (RuxoG). All patient characteristics are given in RuxoG followed by no ruxolitinib group (noRuxo). The diagnosis before HSCT was primary myelofibrosis (83% vs 75%), secondary myelofibrosis (13% vs 19%) or transformed into AML (4% vs 6%). Karnofsky score at transplant was < 70% in 9% and 11%. In RuxoG. median age was older (60.29 vs. 58.75, p=0.069) and delay from diagnosis longer (20.42 vs 13.26 months, p=0.040). RuxoG patients had less frequently anemia < 10 g/dl (84% vs 98%, p=0.027) or thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L (22% vs 32%, p=0.066) and presented more frequently splenomegaly or pre-graft splenectomy (83% vs 63%, p=0.0007). DIPSS score was well balanced in both groups, being high or intermediate-2 in 100 patients (79% vs 86%, p=0.23), from the 235 patients with available data. Myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 16% vs 26% (p=0.049), and conditioning regimen consisted of on fludarabine-busulfan in 33% vs 61%, fludarabine-melphalan in 47% vs 22% or other in 20% vs 16% (p Conclusion: Patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT were at higher risk of acute GVHD and post-transplant mortality, but this was not observed in patients responding to ruxolitinib and it does not translate into higher risk of chronic GVHD. Main hypotheses to explain these finding could be: 1) specific disease, patient or transplant characteristics in RuxoG; 2) the longer delay to transplantation or 3) a specific effect of ruxolitinib. This study suggests that myelofibrosis patients responding to ruxolitinib should have the transplant without waiting disease progression. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Loschi: AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Duléry: Takeda Gilead Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Robin: NEOVII MEDAC NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

Introduction Failure to respond to steroid therapy for intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is associated with limited further therapeutic options. Fecal microbiotherapy is defined as the perfusion of treated stool from one or several healthy donors via the upper or lower gastrointestinal (GI) route aiming at improving microbial diversity and functionality. Here we report clinical outcomes from a 76-patient cohort with steroid refractory (SR) GI-aGvHD treated with the pooled allogenic fecal microbiotherapeutic MaaT013. Twenty-four patients were treated in the prospective, single-arm, phase IIa, HERACLES study (NCT03359980) while 52 patients were treated in an expanded access program (EAP). Patients and methods For HERACLES, 24 patients with grade III-IV SR-GI-aGvHD were treated with MaaT013 in 26 European sites, as a 2 nd line therapy after SR diagnosis and evaluable for treatment response. In EAP, 52 patients with steroid-dependent or SR-GI-aGvHD (classical n=41, late onset n=3, overlap syndrome n=8) were treated. These patients had previously received and failed 1 to 6 lines (median 3; 40/52 received ruxolitinib) of GvHD systemic treatments. GI-GvHD response was evaluated weekly and 28 days after day (D) 0 (inclusion for HERACLES or 1st dose for EAP). For all patients, GI-overall response rate (ORR) at D28 was defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR), compared to D0, without the use of additional systemic therapy. Other endpoints included the best overall response (BOR) achieved at any time, and overall survival (OS). Prepared under GMP, MaaT013 is characterized by a highly consistent richness of 455 ±3% OTUs and an Inverse Simpson index > 20. Treatment comprised 3 MaaT013 doses, each composed of 30 g of feces in 150 mL volume of inoculum (total 90 g of feces from 4 to 8 healthy donors) administered by enema (except for 2 EAP patients by nasogastric tube). All patients received at least 1 MaaT013 dose, 92% (HERACLES) and 87% (EAP) at least 2 doses, and 50% (HERACLES) and 71% (EAP) the full treatment course. In HERACLES, the reasons for not applying the 3 rd dose were death (n=5), physician decision to introduce salvage therapy (n=5), and ICU hospitalization (n=2)). Results In HERACLES, the GI-ORR was 38% including 5 CR, 2 VGPR and 2 PR. In EAP, positive GI-response was achieved in 31/52 patients (60% with 16 CR, 11 VGPR and 4 PR). Considering the GI-BOR, 13/24 (54%) and 35/52 (67%) achieved at least a PR in HERACLES and EAP respectively. In HERACLES, OS was 29% at month (M) 6 and 25% at M12. OS was significantly higher in responding (R) patients (achieving at least PR at D28) compared to non-responding (NR) (44% vs 20% at M6 and 44% vs 13% at M12, logrank p=0.047). In EAP, OS was 48% at M6 and 37% at M12, and significantly higher in R patients compared to NR (71% vs 17% at M6 and 62% vs 6% at M12, logrank p In HERACLES, treatment with MaaT013 was characterized by excellent tolerance: 252 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) were reported for the 24 patients, the majority being infections (79%) and GI disorders (62%), as expected in GvHD patients. Of these 252 TEAE, only 2% (5 serious events in 2 patients) could not reasonably be excluded from being related to MaaT013 by the investigators. Shotgun sequencing in these 5 TEAE revealed that the causative infectious agents could not be detected in the administered MaaT013. In EAP, the safety profile of MaaT013 was considered satisfactory for all patients. 16S microbiome analyses were performed in the HERACLES population and showed that MaaT013 produced an early increase in α-diversity at genus level with a significant increase in Richness index at all evaluated timepoints (p Conclusion We herein report the treatment of 76 SR-GI-aGvHD patients using a full ecosystem, pooled-donor, high-richness biotherapeutic. The D28 GI-ORR was 38% and 60% in HERACLES and EAP respectively and this clinical benefit positively and significantly impacted OS (44% and 62% M12 in HERACLES and EAP R patients respectively). MaaT013 was shown to be safe and effective in these heavily immunocompromised patients, warranting further exploration of this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Malard: JAZZ pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Biocodex: Honoraria; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Loschi: CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Cluzeau: Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Huynh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Holler: MaaT Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vehreschild: SocraTec R&D GmbH: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ferring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Farmak International Holding GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bio-Mérieux: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Basilea: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Arderypharm: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Organobalance: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck/MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunic AG: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycom: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Evonik: Research Funding; Da Volterra: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biontech: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; 3M: Research Funding. Gasc: MaaT Pharma: Current Employment. Plantamura: MaaT Pharma: Current Employment. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.

Because of the persistently high rates of relapse of patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), post-transplantation maintenance therapy has been proposed. We previously initiated a Phase II trial in which epigenetic therapy was combined with immunotherapy in an attempt to reduce disease relapse. In that study, low-dose azacitidine (AZA) and escalating doses of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were given as post-allo-HSCT maintenance treatment. In the present study, we retrospectively analyze a larger cohort of patients receiving post-transplantation maintenance therapy and provide updates on some patients of the earlier study. The objectives of the present study were to analyze the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of patients with high-risk AML or MDS receiving post-transplantation maintenance treatment with AZA with or without DLI. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (54 with AML, 23 with MDS) considered at high risk based on either their genomic or clinical status at transplantation. Following allogeneic transplantation, they received at least 1 cycle of prophylactic or preemptive low-dose AZA with or without escalating doses of DLI to prevent disease relapse. Almost one-half of the patients (47%) were able to receive the full 12 cycles of scheduled AZA, and a majority (79%) received at least 1 DLI. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 19 patients (25%; 16 with AML, 3 with MDS) relapsed, at a median of 9.8 months (range, 4 to 58.6 months), giving a 22% CIR at 24 months. OS and PFS at 24 months were 70.8% and 68.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD were 27.4% and 45%, respectively. Only a minority of patients (11%) required delayed administration of AZA. These findings confirm that AZA-DLI maintenance is both tolerable and effective in reducing the risk of post-transplantation relapse.

Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure in patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding radioimmunotherapy or rituximab (R) to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, ara-c, melphalan) high-dose therapy for ASCT in patients with relapsed FL. Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we conducted a cohort comparison of BEAM (n=1973), Zevalin-BEAM (Z-BEAM) (n=207) and R-BEAM (n=179) and also a matched-cohort analysis of BEAM vs Z-BEAM including 282 and 154 patients, respectively. BEAM, Z-BEAM and R-BEAM groups were well balanced for age, time from diagnosis to ASCT and disease status at ASCT. The cumulative incidences of relapse (IR) at 2 years were 34, 34 and 32% for Z-BEAM, R-BEAM and BEAM, respectively. By multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences with Z-BEAM or R-BEAM compared with BEAM for IR, non-relapse mortality, event-free survival or overall survival. With the caveat that the limitations of registry analyses have to be taken into account, this study does not support adding radioimmunotherapy or R to BEAM in ASCT for relapsed FL. However, we cannot rule out the existence a particular subset of patients who could benefit from Z-BEAM conditioning that cannot be identified in our series, and this should be tested in a randomized trial.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 22 May 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.88.

Background Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has greatly expanded potential donor options for patients (pts) without a fully HLA-matched donor. However, an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (UD) or cord blood transplantation (CBT) are valid options for pts who do not have an haploidentical-related or a fully HLA-matched donor. The incorporation of PTCy with mismatched UD allo-HCT is associated with reduced risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (Jorge et al., BBMT, 2018). No previous study has compared outcomes of these two graft sources in contemporary era. In this study, we compared the outcomes of CBT versus (vs) single antigen-mismatched (HLA 9/10) UD allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in pts with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Pts with AML who underwent a first CBT without PTCy (N=902) or allo-HCT from a 9/10 UD with PTCy (N=280) between 2010 to 2019 were selected from The European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry. We excluded pts who had ex vivo T cell depletion. The median pt age was comparable between CBT and UD cohort [51 years (y) vs. 52 y, p=0.09]. The recipients of CBT had a longer median follow up (47 vs. 19 months, p Results In the univariate analysis, day +180 incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 36% vs. 32% (p=0.07) and grade III-IV acute GvHD was 15% vs. 11% (p=0.16) for CBT and UD cohorts, respectively. The 2-y incidence of total chronic GvHD was 26% vs. 32% (p=0.20) and extensive chronic GvHD was 12% vs. 12% (p=0.83), respectively. CBT was associated with higher incidence of graft failure (11% vs. 4%, p In the MV analysis (Table 1), CBT was associated with higher risk of grade II-IV acute GvHD [hazard ratio (HR)=1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI):1-1.74,p Conclusions In this large registry-based observational study, CBT was associated with inferior LFS, OS and GRFS due to higher NRM and RI compared to 9/10 UD allo-HCT with PTCy. In the absence of a fully matched or haplo donor, 9/10 UD allo-HCT with PTCy may be preferred over CBT in pts with AML. A prospective study is needed to validate our findings. Disclosures Dholaria: Poseida: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; bms: Research Funding. Labopin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Chevallier:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Mohty:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.