Search

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with significant morbidity attributed to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Although alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is an established interventional treatment, mavacamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, has emerged as a noninvasive pharmacologic alternative. Understanding the comparative efficacy of these 2 treatments is important for optimizing patient care. This single-center retrospective study assessed the hemodynamic and functional changes in adult patients with obstructive HCM treated with ASA (n = 58) or mavacamten (n = 36) from July 2012 to May 2024. Outcomes, including changes in LVOT gradient, left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, were collected at baseline, 16 weeks, and after 32 weeks of treatment. ASA and mavacamten were associated with over 70% reductions in Valsalva-induced LVOT gradient and MR after 32 weeks. The maximal effect of ASA on LVOT gradient was observed at 16 weeks, whereas mavacamten's peak effect was noted after 32 weeks. MR severity improved similarly in both cohorts (p <0.01). Patients who underwent ASA had a poorer baseline NYHA functional class than their counterparts; however, each treatment significantly improved LVOT gradients (p <0.001) and average NYHA class after 32 weeks (p <0.001). The average left ventricular ejection fraction was comparable at baseline and after 32 weeks between the 2 groups. Patients treated with ASA were older than those treated with mavacamten (68.5 vs 60.8 years, p <0.001). In patients with obstructive HCM, ASA and mavacamten yield significant and comparable improvements in hemodynamics and functional status after 32 weeks., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Baljash Cheema has served as a consultant for Caption Health, Inc and Viz.ai; speaker with honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb; has served on an Advisory Board for Novo Nordisk; and is an advisor with equity interest in Healthspan, Inc and Zoe Biosciences. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study presents an elderly man with sequential hemodynamic obstructions caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and aortic stenosis. Septal reduction therapy was performed to avoid outflow tract obstruction associated with potential future transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This case highlights the importance of resolving outflow tract obstruction during assessment of aortic valve disease., Competing Interests: The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) is the most widely used transcatheter therapy to treat patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a simple anatomical score to predict procedural outcomes of T-TEER., Methods: All patients (n = 168) who underwent T-TEER between January 2017 and November 2022 at 2 centers were included in the derivation cohort. Additionally, 126 patients from 2 separate institutions served as a validation cohort. T-TEER was performed using 2 commercially available technologies. Core laboratory assessment of procedural transesophageal echocardiograms was used to determine septolateral and anteroposterior coaptation gap, leaflet morphology, septal leaflet length and retraction, chordal structure density, tethering height, en face TR jet morphology and TR jet location, image quality, and the presence of intracardiac leads. A scoring system was derived using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Endpoints assessed were immediate postprocedural TR reduction ≥2 grades and TR grade moderate or less., Results: The median age was 82 years (Q1-Q3: 78-84 years); 48% of patients were women; and patients presented with severe (55%), massive (36%), and torrential (8%) TR. Five variables (septolateral coaptation gap, chordal structure density, en face TR jet morphology, TR jet location, and image quality) were identified as best predicting procedural outcome and were incorporated in the GLIDE (Gap, Location, Image quality, density, en-face TR morphology) score (range 0-5). TR reduction ≥2 grades and TR grade moderate or less were observed in >90% of patients with GLIDE scores of 0 and 1 and in only 5.6% and 16.7% of those with GLIDE scores ≥4. The GLIDE score was then externally validated in a separate cohort (area under the curve: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86). TR reduction significantly correlated with functional improvement assessed by NYHA functional class and 6-minute walk distance at 3 months., Conclusions: The GLIDE score is a simple, 5-component score that is readily obtained during patient imaging and can predict successful T-TEER., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute Clinical Trials Unit at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Dr Gerçek has received research grants from the German Heart Foundation. Dr Narang has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Puthumana has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Drs V. Rudolph and T. Rudolph have received grants and speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Thomas has received consulting fees from Abbott, GE, egnite, EchoIQ, and Caption Health. Dr Luedike has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Rassaf has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo (outside the submitted work). Dr Davidson has received grants from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; is an uncompensated consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and has received honoraria from Philips Healthcare. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The CLASP IID randomized trial (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Pivotal Clinical Trial) demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in patients at prohibitive surgical risk with significant symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR)., Objectives: This study describes the echocardiographic methods and outcomes from the CLASP IID trial and analyzes baseline variables associated with residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤1+., Methods: An independent echocardiographic core laboratory assessed echocardiographic parameters based on American Society of Echocardiography guidelines focusing on MR mechanism, severity, and feasibility of M-TEER. Factors associated with residual MR ≤1+ were identified using logistic regression., Results: In 180 randomized patients, baseline echocardiographic parameters were well matched between the PASCAL (n = 117) and MitraClip (n = 63) groups, with flail leaflets present in 79.2% of patients. Baseline MR was 4+ in 76.4% and 3+ in 23.6% of patients. All patients achieved MR ≤2+ at discharge. The proportion of patients with MR ≤1+ was similar in both groups at discharge but diverged at 6 months, favoring PASCAL (83.7% vs 71.2%). Overall, patients with a smaller flail gap were significantly more likely to achieve MR ≤1+ at discharge (adjusted OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Patients treated with PASCAL and those with a smaller flail gap were significantly more likely to sustain MR ≤1+ to 6 months (adjusted OR: 2.72 and 0.76; 95% CI: 1.08-6.89 and 0.60-0.98, respectively)., Conclusions: The study used DMR-specific echocardiographic methodology for M-TEER reflecting current guidelines and advances in 3-dimensional echocardiography. Treatment with PASCAL and a smaller flail gap were significant factors in sustaining MR ≤1+ to 6 months. Results demonstrate that MR ≤1+ is an achievable benchmark for successful M-TEER. (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Pivotal Clinical Trial [CLASP IID]; NCT03706833)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The CLASP IID trial is funded by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Marcoff has served as a member of the echocardiography core laboratory for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic, with no direct compensation. Dr Koulogiannis has served as a consultant and advisory board member for Edwards Lifesciences; has served as a speaker for Abbott; has served as a member of the echocardiography core laboratory for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic, with no direct compensation. Dr Lilian Aldaia has served as a member of the echocardiography core laboratory for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic, with no direct compensation. Dr Mediratta has served as a member of the echocardiography core laboratory for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic, with no direct compensation. Dr Chadderdon has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and has received research grants from GE Healthcare. Dr Makar has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr Ruf has received speaker, consulting, and proctoring fees from Abbott Laboratories and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nabauer has received speaker, consulting, and proctoring fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Grayburn has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Neochord, W. L. Gore and Associates, and 4C Medical; and has also served as a consultant and advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, W. L. Gore and Associates, and 4C Medical. Dr Vannan has received research grants and speaker honoraria from Piedmont Heart Institute for Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips, Siemens Healthineers, and GE Healthcare. Dr Ender has received institutional honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medela, with no direct compensation. Dr Puthumana has served on the Speakers Bureau and as a training consultant for Abbott Structural and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Mansoor has served as a consultant for Atricure. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has stock options with Navigate; has held institutional consulting contracts with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and has served as a Chief Scientific Officer for the echocardiography core laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, with no direct industry compensation for either. Dr Mahmood has served as a consultant for education materials for Abbott Medical and GE Ultrasound. Dr Haeffele has served as a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Ong has received speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Schneider has served as a speaker, proctor, and advisor for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; and has served as an advisor for Boehringer and Lilly. Dr D. Wang has served as a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Materialise, and Boston Scientific. Dr Koss has served as an educational speaker for Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Harb has served as a consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Mitria. Dr Miyasaka has served as a consultant for Abbott. Dr Ivannikova has received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Mitchel has served on the Abbott Speakers Bureau. Dr Raissi has served as a consultant for Abbott. Dr Kalbacher has received proctor fees from Edwards Lifesciences and PiCardia Ltd; and has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Medical. Dr Ho has served as an advisor for Neochord, Half Moon Medical, and Valgen; and has held institutional consulting contracts with GE Healthcare and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Smith has served in clinical trial leadership and has received institutional grant and travel support for device evaluation from Edwards Lifesciences; has received institutional grants from Artivion; and has received speaker honoraria from Artivion and Medtronic. Dr Hausleiter has served as a consultant and has received speaker honoraria and institutional research support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lim has served as a consultant for Ancora, LagunaTech, Nyra, Opus, Philips, Venus, and Valgen; and has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Gillam has served as a consultant for Philips, Bracco, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and has institutional echocardiography core laboratory contracts from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic, with no direct compensation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: For patients with symptomatic, severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), early results of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TV) intervention studies have shown significant improvements in functional status and quality of life associated with right-heart reverse remodelling. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm sustained improvements in these outcomes., Methods: The prospective, single-arm, multicentre TRISCEND study enrolled 176 patients to evaluate the safety and performance of transcatheter TV replacement in patients with ≥moderate, symptomatic TR despite medical therapy. Major adverse events, reduction in TR grade and haemodynamic outcomes by echocardiography, and clinical, functional, and quality-of-life parameters are reported to one year., Results: Enrolled patients were 71.0% female, mean age 78.7 years, 88.0% ≥ severe TR, and 75.4% New York Heart Association classes III-IV. Tricuspid regurgitation was reduced to ≤mild in 97.6% (P < .001), with increases in stroke volume (10.5 ± 16.8 mL, P < .001) and cardiac output (0.6 ± 1.2 L/min, P < .001). New York Heart Association class I or II was achieved in 93.3% (P < .001), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score increased by 25.7 points (P < .001), and six-minute walk distance increased by 56.2 m (P < .001). All-cause mortality was 9.1%, and 10.2% of patients were hospitalized for heart failure., Conclusions: In an elderly, highly comorbid population with ≥moderate TR, patients receiving transfemoral EVOQUE transcatheter TV replacement had sustained TR reduction, significant increases in stroke volume and cardiac output, and high survival and low hospitalization rates with improved clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes to one year. Funded by Edwards Lifesciences, TRISCEND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04221490., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This study aims to assess whether the On-X aortic valved conduit better restores normal valvular and ascending aortic hemodynamics than other commonly used bileaflet mechanical valved conduit prostheses from St. Jude Medical and Carbomedics by using same-day transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. TTE and 4D flow MRI were performed back-to-back in 10 patients with On-X, six patients with St. Jude (two) and Carbomedics (four) prostheses, and 36 healthy volunteers. TTE evaluated valvular hemodynamic parameters: transvalvular peak velocity (TPV), mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG), and effective orifice area (EOA). 4D flow MRI evaluated the peak systolic 3D viscous energy loss rate (VELR) density and mean vorticity magnitude in the ascending aorta (AAo). While higher TPV and mean and peak TPG were recorded in all patients compared to healthy subjects, the values in On-X patients were closer to those in healthy subjects (TPV 1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s, mean TPG 7.4 ± 1.9 vs. 9.2 ± 2.3 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9 mmHg, peak TPG 15.3 ± 5.2 vs. 18.9 ± 5.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.8 mmHg, p  < 0.001). Likewise, while higher VELR density and mean vorticity magnitude were recorded in all patients than in healthy subjects, the values in On-X patients were closer to those in healthy subjects (VELR: 50.6 ± 20.1 vs. 89.8 ± 35.2 vs. 21.4 ± 9.2 W/m 3 , p  < 0.001) and vorticity (147.6 ± 30.0 vs. 191.2 ± 26.0 vs. 84.6 ± 20.5 s-1, p  < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the On-X aortic valved conduit may produce less aberrant hemodynamics in the AAo while maintaining similar valvular hemodynamics to St. Jude Medical and Carbomedics alternatives., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Lee, Huh, Scott, Elbaz, Puthumana, McCarthy, Malaisrie, Markl, Thomas and Barker.)

Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) has significantly expanded treatment options for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a sizeable proportion of patients are still declined for TTVr and little is known about their clinical characteristics and cardiac morphology., Objectives: This study sought to characterize patients who screen fail for TTVr with respect to their clinical characteristics and cardiac morphology., Methods: A total of 547 patients were evaluated for TTVr between January 2016 to December 2021 from 3 centers in the United States and Germany. Clinical records and echocardiographic studies were used to assess medical history and right ventricular (RV) and tricuspid valve (TV) characteristics., Results: Median age was 80 (IQR: 74-83) years and 60.0% were female. Over half (58.1%) were accepted for TTVr. Of those who were deemed unsuitable for TTVr (41.9%), the most common exclusion reasons were anatomical criteria (56.8%). In the regression analysis, RV and right atrial size, TV coaptation gap, and tethering area were identified as independent screen failure predictors. Other rejection reasons included clinical futility (17.9%), low symptom burden (12.7%), and technical limitations (12.7%). Most of the excluded patients (71.6%) were managed conservatively with medical therapy, while a small number either proceeded to TV surgery (22.3%) or subsequently became eligible for transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in later available clinical trials in the United States (6.1%)., Conclusions: The majority of TTVr screen failure patients are excluded due to TV, right atrial, and RV enlargement. However, a significant proportion is excluded due to clinical futility. These identifiable anatomical and clinical characteristics emphasize the importance of earlier referral and intervention of TR and the need for continued innovation of Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Gerçek has received research grant support from the German Heart Foundation. Dr Puthumana has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Dr Malaisrie received research grant support and served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Thomas has received consulting fees from Abbott, GE, egnite, EchoIQ, and Caption Health. Drs Rudolph and Rudolph have received research grants and speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Pfister has received speaker honoraria and consultancy fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr Davidson received research grants from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; served as an uncompensated consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and received Honoria from Philips Healthcare. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

This review discusses the contemporary clinical evaluation and management of patients with comorbid aortic regurgitation (AR) and heart failure (HF) (AR-HF). Importantly, as clinical HF exists along the spectrum of AR severity, the present review also details novel strategies to detect early signs of HF before the clinical syndrome ensues. Indeed, there may be a vulnerable cohort of AR patients who benefit from early detection and management of HF. Additionally, while the mainstay of operative management for AR has historically been surgical aortic valve replacement, this review discusses alternate procedures that may be beneficial in high-risk cohorts., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Primary mitral regurgitation is a frequent etiology of congestive heart failure and is best treated with intervention when patients are symptomatic or when additional risk factors exist. Surgical intervention improves outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, for those at high surgical risk, transcatheter intervention provides less invasive repair and replacement options while providing comparable outcomes to surgery. The excess mortality and high prevalence of heart failure in untreated mitral regurgitation illuminate the need for further developments in mitral valve intervention ideally fulfilled by expanding these types of procedures and eligibility to these procedures beyond only those at high surgical risk., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The causes of mitral regurgitation (MR) can be broadly divided into primary and secondary causes. Although primary MR is caused by degenerative alterations of the mitral valve and the mitral valve apparatus, secondary (functional) MR is multifactorial and related to dilation of the left ventricle and/or mitral annulus commonly resulting in concomitant restriction of the leaflets. Therefore, the treatment of secondary MR (SMR) is complex and includes guideline directed heart failure therapy along with surgical and transcatheter approaches that have shown effectiveness in certain subgroups. This review aims to provide insight into current advances in diagnosis and management of SMR., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vaccine development against COVID-19 has mitigated severe disease. However, reports of rare but serious adverse events following immunization (sAEFI) in the young populations are fuelling parental anxiety and vaccine hesitancy. With a very early season of viral illnesses including COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, metapneumovirus and several others, children are facing a winter with significant respiratory illness burdens. Yet, COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake remain sluggish due to the mistaken beliefs that children have low rates of severe COVID-19 illness as well as rare but severe complications from COVID-19 vaccine are common. In this study we examined composite sAEFI reported in association with COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (US) amongst 5-17-year-old children, to ascertain the composite reported risk associated with vaccination. Between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022, a total of 467,890,599 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered to individuals aged 5-65 years in the US, of which 180 million people received at least 2 doses. In association with these, a total of 177,679 AEFI were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event reporting System (VAERS) of which 31,797 (17.9%) were serious. The rates of ED visits per 100,000 recipients were 2.56 (95% CI: 2.70-3.47) amongst 5-11-year-olds, 18.25 (17.57-18.95) amongst 12-17-year-olds and 33.74 (33.36-34.13) amongst 18-65-year olds; hospitalizations were 1.07 (95% CI 0.87-1.32) per 100,000 in 5-11-year-olds, 6.83 (6.42-7.26) in 12-17-year olds and 8.15 (7.96-8.35) in 18-65 years; life-threatening events were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.25) per 100,000 in 5-11-year olds, 1.22 (1.05-1.41) in 12-17-year-olds and 2.96 (2.85-3.08) in 18-65 year olds; and death 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.10) per 100,000 in 5-11 year olds, 0.08 (0.05-0.14) amongst 12-17-year olds and 0.76 (0.71-0.82) in 18-65 years age group. The results of our study from national population surveillance data demonstrate rates of reported serious AEFIs amongst 5-17-year-olds which appear to be significantly lower than in 18-65-year-olds. These low risks must be taken into account in overall recommendation of COVID-19 vaccination amongst children., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Mangat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is prevalent and undertreated, with mortality and morbidity increasing with TR severity. Given poor outcomes with medical therapy and high in-hospital mortality for isolated tricuspid valve surgery, emerging transcatheter repair devices offer a promising alternative., Objectives: The Edwards Cardioband Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System Early Feasibility study (NCT03382457) evaluates the treatment of functional TR via annular reduction with the Cardioband Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System (Edwards Lifesciences)., Methods: Patients with ≥ moderate functional TR were eligible for this prospective, single-arm multicenter study. At 1 year, patients were evaluated for echocardiographic parameters, clinical and quality-of-life measures, and major adverse events., Results: The 37 patients enrolled had a mean age of 78 years; 76% were female; and they had ≥ severe functional (97.3%) or mixed (2.7%) TR, atrial flutter/fibrillation (97%), and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (65%). At 1 year, 73.0% achieved ≤ moderate TR (P < 0.0001), and 73.1% had ≥2 grade reductions. Echocardiography showed significant reductions in the tricuspid annulus diameter (P < 0.0001), mean vena contracta (P < 0.0001), proximal isovelocity surface area effective regurgitant orifice area (P < 0.0001), right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P < 0.0001), and inferior vena contracta (P = 0.0006). New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly (P < 0.0001), with 92.3% achieving class I/II, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores improved by 19.0 points (P < 0.0001). One-year cardiovascular mortality was 8.1%, reinterventions were necessary in 5.4%, major access site complications occurred in 8.1%, and severe bleeding was noted in 35.1% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and freedom from heart failure rehospitalization were 85.9% and 88.7%, respectively., Conclusions: One-year experience using the Cardioband system for tricuspid valve repair shows high survival and low rehospitalization rates with durable outcomes in TR reduction and echocardiographic, clinical, and quality-of-life outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Gray consults for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lim has received institutional research grants with Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and has received consulting fees from Venus Medtech and WL Gore. Dr Smith has received institutional grant support and serves as a speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Artivion; is on the advisory board for Edwards Lifesciences; and is a speaker for Medtronic. Dr Grayburn has received research grants from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Gore, Neochord, and Cardiovalve; and serves as a consultant/advisory board for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and 4C Medical. Dr Kodali has received research support from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, JenaValve, and Abbott Vascular; has received honoraria from Admedus, TriFlo, and Dura Biotech; and is on the advisory board and received equity from MicroInterventional Devices, Dura Biotech, Supira, Adona Medical, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Inc, and TriFlo. Dr Hahn has received fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and has stock options with Navigate and is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Whisenant consults for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr McCabe consults for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr Puthumana is on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott Structural. Dr Davidson has received research grant funding and is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to valve-replacing aortic root replacement (VRARR) with valved-conduits based on recent guidelines for clinical practice. This study investigated outcomes of these two procedures in patients with nonstenotic valves., Methods: Between January 7, 2007 and June 30, 2019, 475 patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis underwent VSARR (151) or VRARR (324) techniques. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to alleviate confounding. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, 8-year survival and reoperation, aortic regurgitation, and valve gradients., Results: PSM created 69 pairs of patients with a mean age 52 ± 13 years (10.1% Marfan syndrome, 34.8% bicuspid aortic valve). There was no statistically significant difference in major perioperative morbidity or 30-day mortality (0% VSARR vs. 1.4% VRARR; p = 0.316). Overall survival was significantly higher (p = 0.025) in the VSARR group versus the VRARR group (8-year estimates 100% vs. 88.9%, respectively), while freedom from valve reoperation was similar (p = 0.97, 8-year estimates 90.9% vs. 96.7%, respectively). Freedom from > moderate-severe AR was not significantly different (p = 0.08, 8-year estimates 90.0% VSARR group vs. 100% VRARR), but mean valve gradients at last follow-up were better in the VSARR group (5.9 vs. 13.2 mmHg, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: VSARR is a safe operation in patients with aortic root aneurysm and nonstenotic aortic valves in the hands of experienced surgeons. Freedom from reoperation is similar and the mode of aortic valve failure differs between the two groups., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Patients with bicuspid aortic valves commonly require an intervention on their valve and/or aorta. Because of their heterogeneous presentations, recommendations for imaging surveillance and surgery timing are highly individualized. Critical points in care include time of diagnosis, transition from adolescent to adult medicine, and surgery referral. To better support patients with bicuspid aortic valves, we developed a comprehensive program that utilizes the multidisciplinary care team, complex interventions, and translational research protocols. We describe our program structure and experience with this common and sometimes challenging diagnosis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: PMM: Royalties: Edwards Lifesciences, Inc.; Speaker fees: Atricure, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc.; Edwards Lifesciences, Inc. SCM: Consultant: Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Medtronic, Inc.; Cryolife; Terumo Aortic. MM: Research support: Siemens; Grant: Circle Cardiovascular Imaging ROB: Editor-in-Chief, JAMA Cardiology. PWMF: Consultant: Aziyo Biologics Inc., Abyrx Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study investigates the effect of prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use on patients with small burns [≤20% total body surface area (TBSA)] on rates of infection, graft loss, or readmission., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients admitted to our institution's burn center between January 2020 and July 2021. Patients were included if they had a 20% or less TBSA burn with 1 or more operating room visit for burn excision and were excluded if a preoperative infection was present. Data were gathered regarding patient demographics, burn mechanism, burn characteristics, and outcome measures including infection, graft loss, and readmission. Statistical analysis was conducted by Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests, and P values reported at two-sided significance of less than 0.05., Results: There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, TBSA, percent third-degree burn, or comorbidities between patients who received (n = 29) or did not receive (n = 47) prophylactic perioperative antibiotics. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher length of stay in the prophylactic antibiotic group, possibly driven by a nonsignificant trend toward higher rates of flame injuries in this group. There was no difference in infection ( P = 0.544), graft loss ( P = 0.494), or 30-day readmission ( P = 0.584) between the two groups., Conclusion: This study finds no significant difference in postoperative infection, graft loss, or 30-day readmission in two similar patient cohorts who received or did not receive prophylactic perioperative antibiotics for acute excision of small (≤20% TBSA) burns., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Elite athletes show structural cardiac changes as an adaptation to exercise. Studies examining strain in athletes have largely analyzed images at rest only. There is little data available regarding the change in strain with exercise. Our objectives were: to investigate the feasibility of strain analysis in athletes at peak exercise, to determine the normal range of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) within this population postexercise, to describe how LV GLS changes with exercise, and to determine whether any clinical characteristics correlate with the change in GLS that occurs with exercise., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on elite athletes who participated in the 2016-2018 National Basketball Association Draft Combines. Echocardiograms were obtained at rest and after completing a treadmill stress test to maximal exertion or completion of Bruce protocol. Primary outcomes included GLS obtained at rest and peak exercise. Secondary outcome was the change in GLS between rest and exercise. Univariate relationships between various clinical characteristics and our secondary outcome were analyzed., Results: Our final cohort (n = 111) was all male and 92/111 (82.9%) were African American. Mean GLS magnitude increased in response to exercise (-17.6 ± 1.8 vs -19.2 ± 2.6, P < .0001). Lower resting heart rates (r = .22, P = .02) and lower heart rates at peak exercise (r = .21, P = .03) correlated with the increase in LV GLS from exercise., Conclusions: Strain imaging is technically feasible to obtain among elite basketball athletes at peak exercise. Normative strain response to exercise from this study may help identify abnormal responses to exercise in athletes., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TMVR) offers a less invasive strategy for managing bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. TMVR positioning is challenging in the setting of a radiolucent bioprosthetic sewing ring. We present 2 cases demonstrating the roles of fluoroscopy and echocardiography in guiding TMVR placement within bioprostheses with radiolucent sewing rings. ( Level of Difficulty: Intermediate. )., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Objective: Bicuspid aortic valve is a common risk factor for thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Guidelines for elective ascending aortic intervention (AAI) in bicuspid aortic valve are derived from limited evidence, and the extent of practice variation due to patient and provider characteristics is unknown. Using data from 2 large cardiovascular registries, we investigated factors that influence decisions for AAI., Methods: All bicuspid aortic valve cases with known aortic diameters and surgical status were included. We used multivariable logistic regression to profile predictors of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR+AAI, stratified by patient characteristics, surgical indications, and institution., Results: We studied 2861 subjects at 18 institutions from 1996 to 2015. The median aortic diameter of patients who underwent AVR+AAI varied widely across institutions (39-52 mm). Aortic diameters were <45 mm in 38% of patients undergoing AVR+AAI. Patients who underwent AAI at <45 mm, compared with those managed nonoperatively, were younger (54 ± 13 vs 61 ± 15 years; P < .001) with more frequent aortic stenosis (53% vs 28%; P < .001) and regurgitation (52% vs 18%; P < .001)., Conclusions: Clinical and institutional factors influence the timing of AAI and are associated with significant variability in ascending aortic diameter at AAI across institutions. More than one third of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve undergo AAI at aortic diameters <45 mm. Long-term outcomes of this subgroup of patients, who may manifest earlier and more severe disease, are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of routine aortic interventions at smaller diameters., (Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tricuspid valve (TV) degeneration after surgical repair with an annuloplasty ring is problematic as redo operation carries high mortality. This can be addressed with transcatheter therapies to implant a valve within in prior ring (tricuspid valve-in-ring). When an incomplete ring is present, paravalvular leak is commonly encountered after tricuspid valve-in-ring (TViR) implant; however, this can be addressed with paravalvular leak closure devices. Multimodality imaging including cardiac computed tomography and three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are important for successful TViR implant. We report a case of tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid repair with an incomplete annuloplasty ring and subsequent paravalvular leak closure., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart diagnosis and is associated with aortopathy. Current guidelines for aortic resection have been validated but are based on aortic diameter, which is insufficient to predict acute aortic events. Clinical and translational collaboration is necessary to identify biomarkers that can individualize the timing of prophylactic surgery for BAV aortopathy. We describe our multidisciplinary BAV program, including research protocols aimed at biomarker discovery and results from our longitudinal clinical registry. From 2012-2018, 887 patients enrolled in our clinical BAV registry with the option to undergo four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR) and donate serum plasma or tissue samples. Of 887 patients, 388 (44%) had an elective BAV-related procedure after initial presentation, while 499 (56%) continued with medical management. Of medical patients, 44 (9%) had elective surgery after 2.3 ± 1.4 years. Surgery patients' biobank donations include 198 (46%) aorta, 374 (86%) aortic valve, and 314 (73%) plasma samples. The 4D flow CMR was completed for 215 (50%) surgery patients and 243 (49%) medical patients. Patients with BAV aortopathy can be safely followed by a multidisciplinary team to detect indications for surgery. Paired tissue and hemodynamic analysis holds opportunity for biomarker development in BAV aortopathy.

Background: Rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) is common, and subclinical congestion may be present at discharge. Larger inferior vena cava (IVC) size and lower collapsibility at discharge assessed via bedside ultrasound are predictive of rehospitalization; however, the utility of IVC assessment with the use of pocket-carried ultrasound (PCUS) during the transition from discharge to the posthospitalization follow-up visit (FU) has not been investigated., Methods and Results: IVC max and IVC min were measured with the use of PCUS, and the collapsibility index (IVCCI = [IVC max  - IVC min ]/IVC max ) was determined. The primary outcome was 90-day rehospitalization or death. We prospectively enrolled 49 adults (71 ± 13 years of age, 51% male, 47% black, 43% preserved ejection fraction) hospitalized for HF. Nineteen patients (39%) experienced the outcome. Within the rehospitalized group, discharge and FU mean IVC max were both >2.1 cm (2.2 ± 0.5 and 2.2 ± 0.7) and IVCCIs <50% (44 ± 20% and 45 ± 24%). Within those not rehospitalized, FU IVC max was ≤2.1 cm (2.1 ± 0.6 and 1.9 ± 0.6; P = .038) and IVCCI >50% at both time points (55 ± 25% and 62 ± 19%; P = NS). FU IVCCI below an optimal cutoff of 42% had modest discrimination alone (c-statistic = 0.73). FU IVCCI <42% was associated with a greater hazard of the outcome independent of admission log B-type natriuretic peptide (adjusted hazard ratio = 6.8; 95% confidence interval 2.4-19.0; P < .001)., Conclusions: Posthospitalization IVCCI assessment with PCUS predicts HF rehospitalization and may identify patients in need of intervention., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Measuring myocardial strain using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography has emerged as a new tool to identify subclinical ventricular dysfunction. Abnormal strain has been shown to have superior sensitivity compared with dobutamine stress echocardiography for viability assessment; however, there is a paucity of data regarding the prediction of long-term major adverse cardiac events. We compared the prognostic ability of both global longitudinal strain (GLS) from resting echocardiograms to regional wall motion score index (WMSI) from stress echocardiograms in their ability to predict long-term major adverse cardiac events., Methods: Patients referred for stress echocardiography, who also underwent coronary angiography within 3 months of stress echo (n=122), were enrolled. Patients with reduced ejection fractions (<40%) were excluded. Patients were followed for a median of 3.4 years for major adverse cardiac events, readmissions and repeat cardiac testing., Results: Patients with abnormal GLS (GLS <16.8%) from the resting echocardiogram obtained as part of the exercise echocardiogram experienced a significantly shorter time to major adverse cardiac events (p=0.026), first cardiovascular hospitalization and repeat cardiac testing (p=0.0011) compared to those with normal GLS. Abnormal GLS appears to be a better predictor than abnormal WMSI in predicting major adverse cardiac events (p=0.174) and time to first cardiovascular hospitalization or repeat cardiac testing (p=0.0093)., Conclusion: GLS may be a better predictor of long-term major adverse cardiac events, readmissions and repeat cardiac testing than WMSI in patients undergoing stress echocardiography.

Background: Carotid artery stenosis is a risk factor for stroke after surgical aortic valve replacement, but it is unknown whether carotid and vertebral artery disease impacts the risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods: We reviewed 294 consecutive cases of TAVR at a tertiary care medical centre. Thirty-one patients without preoperative carotid/vertebral duplex ultrasonograms were excluded. Carotid or vertebral artery disease was defined on the basis of >50% stenosis. Outcomes were stroke within 30 days after TAVR, 30-day mortality, and overall survival., Results: Fifty-one patients (19%) had at least 50% stenosis of a carotid or vertebral artery. The carotid and vertebral artery disease group had higher rates of coronary artery disease, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, and peripheral artery disease compared with the control group. Transfemoral access was less common in the carotid and vertebral artery disease group (55% vs 77%; P < 0.01). Stroke occurred in 6.8% of patients (n = 18) within 30 days after TAVR, but no patients in the carotid and vertebral artery disease group had a stroke. The presence of at least 50% stenosis of a carotid or vertebral artery was not predictive of stroke by logistic regression. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (10% vs 4%; P = 0.11) and overall survival (log-rank test P = 0.84) between the groups., Conclusions: The presence or absence of carotid or vertebral artery stenosis was not significantly related to the occurrence of stroke after TAVR. Routine screening for carotid and vertebral artery disease before TAVR does not appear justified., (Copyright © 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: No medical therapy has been proven to prevent the progression of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease, and prophylactic aortic surgery remains the mainstay of treatment., Hypothesis: Among patients with BAV disease who are referred for surgery, preoperative statin use is associated with decreased odds of ascending aortic dilatation., Methods: We reviewed all BAV patients who underwent aortic valve and/or aortic surgery at our center between April 2004 and December 2013. Aortic diameter (AD), defined as the maximum ascending aortic dimension, was determined by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or echocardiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups: maximal AD <4.5 cm or ≥4.5 cm. The association between preoperative statin use and aortic dilatation was assessed using multivariable logistic regression modeling., Results: Of 680 consecutive patients, 405 (60%) had AD <4.5 cm (mean age, 60 ± 14 years; 45% on statins), whereas 275 (40%) had AD ≥4.5 cm (mean age, 54 ± 13 years; 35% on statins) at the time of surgery. After adjusting for age, body surface area, sex, hypertension, aortic stenosis, severity of aortic regurgitation, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and β-blockers, patients with AD ≥4.5 cm had 0.66× lower odds (95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.96) of being on preoperative statins compared with those with AD <4.5 cm (P = 0.029)., Conclusions: In a retrospective study of BAV patients referred for surgery, preoperative statin use was associated with lower odds of clinically significant ascending aortic dilatation., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Suspected genetic causes for extracellular matrix (ECM) dysregulation in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) have influenced strategies and thresholds for surgical resection of BAV aortopathy. Using 4-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), we have documented increased regional wall shear stress (WSS) in the ascending aorta of BAV patients., Objectives: This study assessed the relationship between WSS and regional aortic tissue remodeling in BAV patients to determine the influence of regional WSS on the expression of ECM dysregulation., Methods: BAV patients (n = 20) undergoing ascending aortic resection underwent pre-operative 4D flow CMR to regionally map WSS. Paired aortic wall samples (i.e., within-patient samples obtained from regions of elevated and normal WSS) were collected and compared for medial elastin degeneration by histology and ECM regulation by protein expression., Results: Regions of increased WSS showed greater medial elastin degradation compared to adjacent areas with normal WSS: decreased total elastin (p = 0.01) with thinner fibers (p = 0.00007) that were farther apart (p = 0.001). Multiplex protein analyses of ECM regulatory molecules revealed an increase in transforming growth factor β-1 (p = 0.04), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 (p = 0.03), MMP-2 (p = 0.06), MMP-3 (p = 0.02), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (p = 0.04) in elevated WSS regions, indicating ECM dysregulation in regions of high WSS., Conclusions: Regions of increased WSS correspond with ECM dysregulation and elastic fiber degeneration in the ascending aorta of BAV patients, implicating valve-related hemodynamics as a contributing factor in the development of aortopathy. Further study to validate the use of 4D flow CMR as a noninvasive biomarker of disease progression and its ability to individualize resection strategies is warranted., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Gender disparities in short- and long-term outcomes have been documented in cardiac and valvular heart surgery. However, there is a paucity of data regarding these differences in the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) population. The aim of this study was to examine gender-specific differences in short- and long-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement in patients with BAV. A retrospective analysis was performed in 628 consecutive patients with BAV who underwent AV surgery from April 2004 to December 2013. To reduce bias when comparing outcomes by gender, propensity score matching obtained on the basis of potential confounders was used. Women with BAV who underwent AV surgery presented with more advanced age (mean 60.7 ± 13.8 vs 56.3 ± 13.6 years, p <0.001) and less aortic regurgitation (29% vs 44%, p <0.001) and had a higher risk for in-hospital mortality (mean Ambler score 3.4 ± 4.4 vs 2.5 ± 4.0, p = 0.015). After propensity score matching, women received more blood products postoperatively (48% vs 34%, p = 0.028) and had more prolonged postoperative lengths of stay (median 5 days [interquartile range 5 to 7] vs 5 days [interquartile range 4 to 6], p = 0.027). Operative, discharge, and 30-day mortality and overall survival were not significantly different. In conclusion, women with BAV who underwent AV surgery were older, presented with less aortic regurgitation, and had increased co-morbidities, lending higher operative risk. Although women received more blood products and had significantly longer lengths of stay, short- and long-term outcomes were similar., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ventricular septal myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) has been shown to reduce left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) gradient and improve symptoms, although little data exist regarding changes in left atrial (LA) volume and LV diastolic function after myectomy. We investigated changes in LA size and LV diastolic function in patients with HC after septal myectomy from 2004 to 2011. We studied 25 patients (age 49.2 ± 13.1 years, 48% women) followed for a mean of 527 days after surgery who had serial echocardiography at baseline and at most recent follow-up, at least 6 months after myectomy. In addition to myectomy, 3 patients (12%) underwent Maze surgery and 13 (52%) underwent mitral valve surgery, of whom 5 had a mitral valve replacement or mitral annuloplasty. Patients with mitral valve replacement or mitral annuloplasty were excluded from LV diastolic function analysis. LA volume index decreased (from 47.2 ± 17.6 to 35.9 ± 17.0 ml/m(2), p = 0.001) and LV diastolic function improved with an increase in lateral e' velocity (from 7.3 ± 2.9 to 9.8 ± 3.1 cm/sec, p = 0.01) and a decrease in E/e' (from 14.8 ± 6.3 to 11.7 ± 5.5, p = 0.051). Ventricular septal thickness and LVOT gradient decreased, and symptoms of dyspnea and heart failure improved, with reduction in the New York Heart Association functional class III/IV symptoms from 21 (84%) to 1 (4%). In conclusion, relief of LVOT obstruction in HC by septal myectomy results in improved LV diastolic function and reduction in LA volume with improved symptoms., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with aortic dilatation and aneurysm (AN) formation. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2006 guidelines recommend replacement of the ascending aorta for an aortic diameter (AD)> 45 mm in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). We evaluated the outcomes of AVR and AVR with aortic replacement (AVR/AN)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed (2004-2011) the data from 456 patients with BAV and compared the morbidity and mortality between the AVR and AVR/AN groups and 3 subgroups: AVR with an AD<45 mm; AVR/AN with an AD of 45 to 49 mm; and AVR/AN with an AD of ≥50 mm. Propensity score matching was used to reduce bias., Results: Of the 456 patients, 250 (55%) underwent AVR and 206 (45%) AVR/AN, with 98% compliance with the current guidelines. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.9%. The AVR AD<45-mm group had adjusted short- and medium-term survival similar to that of the AVR/AN AD 45- to 49-mm and AVR/AN AD≥50-mm groups, with a 30-day mortality of 0.8%, 0%, and 1.9%, respectively (P=.41). The propensity score-matched AVR/AN AD≥50-mm group had significantly greater rates of reintubation than either the AVR AD<45-mm (P=.012) or AVR/AN AD 45- to 49-mm (P=.04) group and greater rates of prolonged ventilation (P=.022) than the AVR AD<45-mm group. No significant differences were found in reoperation or myocardial infarction among the subgroups., Conclusions: In patients with undergoing AVR, no increase was seen in morbidity or mortality when adding aortic replacement with an AD of 45 to 49 mm, in accordance with the 2006 ACC/AHA guidelines, although the AVR/AN AD≥50-mm group had a greater risk of respiratory complications. Our findings indicate that compliance with the ACC/AHA guidelines is safe in select centers., (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prevalence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and its impact on survival after aortic valve replacement have not been clearly defined. Historically, the presence of PPM was identified from postoperative echocardiograms or preoperative manufacturer-provided charts, resulting in wide discrepancies. The 2009 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines proposed an algorithmic approach to calculate PPM. This study compared PPM prevalence and its impact on survival using 3 modalities: (1) the ASE guidelines-suggested algorithm (ASE PPM); (2) the manufacturer-provided charts (M PPM); and (3) the echocardiographically measured, body surface area-indexed, effective orifice area (EOAi PPM) measurement., Methods and Results: A total of 614 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardial valves from 2004 to 2009 and had normal preoperative systolic function. EOAi PPM was severe if EOAi was ≤ 0.60 cm(2)/m(2), moderate if EOAi was 0.60 to 0.85 cm(2)/m(2), and absent (none) if EOAi was ≥ 0.85 cm(2)/m(2). ASE PPM was severe in 22 (3.6%), moderate in 6 (1%), and absent (none) in 586 (95.4%). ASE PPM was similar to manufacturer-provided PPM (P=1.00). ASE PPM differed significantly from EOAi PPM (P<0.001), which identified severe mismatch in 170 (29.7%), moderate in 191 (33.4%), and absent (none) in 211 patients (36.9%). Irrespective of the PPM classification method, PPM did not adversely affect midterm survival (average follow-up, 4.1 ± 1.8 years; median, 3.9 years; range, 0.01-8 years). There were no reoperations for PPM., Conclusions: In patients with normal systolic function undergoing bovine pericardial aortic valve replacement, the prevalence of PPM using the algorithmic-ASE approach was low and correlated well with manufacturer-provided PPM. Independent of the method of PPM assessment, PPM was not associated with medium-term mortality.

Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic power of abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS) to detect non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in the resting echocardiogram. GLS using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D STE) is a powerful tool for detecting advanced CAD. However, the diagnostic power of 2D STE for detecting moderate, clinically unapparent CAD from images obtained at rest is unknown., Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied 2D STE characteristics in 123 consecutive patients who underwent stress echocardiography, and subsequently coronary angiography within 10 days. We compared the diagnostic power of GLS at rest to the conventional wall motion score index (WMSI) during stress for detecting stenosis ≥ 50% (CAD(>50)) in any major coronary artery. Studies with akinetic or dyskinetic segments and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were excluded. In 56 patients with significant CAD(>50), GLS was -16.77 ± 3.18% compared with -19.05 ± 3.43% in the 67 patients without CAD(<50) (P = 0.0002). A GLS cutpoint of greater than -17.77% had the most optimal sensitivity and specificity (66/76%) for detecting CAD and was comparable to a WMSI ≥ 1.13 (68/70%) measured during stress., Conclusion: Non-obstructive CAD was identified by a reduced GLS measured by 2D STE in rest images with similar accuracy to the traditional WMSI measured in stress echocardiography.

Purpose of Review: This review article will discuss aortic stenosis, the evolving studies defining the cellular mechanisms and the potential for medical therapies for the treatment of this disease., Recent Findings: Currently, the only therapy for these patients is surgical valve replacement. In the past decade there has been a change in the paradigm towards our understanding of the cellular biology of this disease process. Studies in laboratories across the world have demonstrated that this disease has an active biology and that this biology may be targeted with medical therapies similar to that of vascular atherosclerosis., Summary: Calcific aortic stenosis is the third most common form of cardiovascular disease in the USA. It has replaced rheumatic heart disease in prevalence in western countries due to improved access to healthcare and the widespread use of antibiotics.