43 results on '"Ramiro Checa-Garcia"'
Search Results
2. Separating the shortwave and longwave components of greenhouse gas radiative forcing
- Author
-
Keith P. Shine, Rachael E. Byrom, and Ramiro Checa‐Garcia
- Subjects
carbon dioxide ,methane ,ozone ,radiative forcing ,solar radiation ,Meteorology. Climatology ,QC851-999 - Abstract
Abstract Many important greenhouse gases (including water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane and ozone) absorb solar radiation. When gas concentrations change, this absorption exerts a radiative forcing that modifies the thermal infrared (‘longwave’) radiative forcing which is predominant for most gases (ozone being a major exception). The nature of the solar forcing differs from the longwave forcing in several ways. For example, the sign of the instantaneous solar forcing can differ between the tropopause and top‐of‐atmosphere, and the sign can differ between gases. In addition, a significant part of the solar forcing can be manifested in the longwave, following stratospheric temperature adjustment, which can counteract or enhance the instantaneous solar forcing. Here the nature of solar forcing is examined via a mixture of idealised and more realistic calculations, which consider the effect of perturbations in carbon dioxide, methane and ozone. An apparent contradiction in the sign of the solar forcing of carbon dioxide is resolved; it is shown to be negative, reducing the net carbon dioxide forcing by about 2.3%. The relevance of this work to the effective radiative forcing concept is also discussed.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The impact of different CO2 and ODS levels on the mean state and variability of the springtime Arctic stratosphere
- Author
-
Jessica Kult-Herdin, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, and Harald E Rieder
- Subjects
stratosphere ,temperature ,GHG ,ODS ,interactive chemistry ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Rising greenhouse gases (GHG) and decreasing anthropogenic ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are the main drivers of the stratospheric climate evolution in the 21st century. However, the coupling between stratospheric composition, radiation and dynamics is subject to many uncertainties, which is partly because of the simplistic representation of ozone (O _3 ) in many current climate models. Changes in ozone due to heterogeneous chemistry are known to be the largest during springtime in the Arctic, which is also a season with very active stratosphere–troposphere coupling. The focus of this study is to investigate the role of varying ozone levels driven by changing GHG and ODS for the Arctic polar cap stratosphere. We use two state-of-the-art chemistry-climate models with ocean coupling in two configurations (prescribed ozone fields vs. interactive ozone chemistry) for three different scenarios: preindustrial conditions—1 × CO _2 , year 2000 conditions (peak anthropogenic ODS levels) and extreme future conditions—4 × CO _2 . Our results show that in the upper and middle stratosphere CO _2 thermal cooling is the dominant effect determining the temperature response under 4 × CO _2 , and outweighs warming effects of ozone by about a factor of ten. In contrast, in the lower stratosphere, the effects of O _3 warming and CO _2 cooling under 4 × CO _2 are largely offsetting each other. ODS driven variations in O _3 affect both the temperature mean and variability, and are responsible for the tight springtime coupling between composition and dynamics under year 2000 conditions in comparison to simulations under 1 × CO _2 or 4 × CO _2 .
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Understanding Top‐of‐Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear‐Sky Perspective
- Author
-
Wenying Su, Lusheng Liang, Gunnar Myhre, Tyler J. Thorsen, Norman G. Loeb, Gregory L. Schuster, Paul Ginoux, Fabien Paulot, David Neubauer, Ramiro Checa‐Garcia, Hitoshi Matsui, Kostas Tsigaridis, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Toshihiko Takemura, Susanne E. Bauer, and Michael Schulz
- Subjects
aerosols ,radiative flux ,surface albedo ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract Biases in aerosol optical depths (AOD) and land surface albedos in the AeroCom models are manifested in the top‐of‐atmosphere (TOA) clear‐sky reflected shortwave (SW) fluxes. Biases in the SW fluxes from AeroCom models are quantitatively related to biases in AOD and land surface albedo by using their radiative kernels. Over ocean, AOD contributes about 25% to the 60°S–60°N mean SW flux bias for the multi‐model mean (MMM) result. Over land, AOD and land surface albedo contribute about 40% and 30%, respectively, to the 60°S–60°N mean SW flux bias for the MMM result. Furthermore, the spatial patterns of the SW flux biases derived from the radiative kernels are very similar to those between models and CERES observation, with the correlation coefficient of 0.6 over ocean and 0.76 over land for MMM using data of 2010. Satellite data used in this evaluation are derived independently from each other, consistencies in their bias patterns when compared with model simulations suggest that these patterns are robust. This highlights the importance of evaluating related variables in a synergistic manner to provide an unambiguous assessment of the models, as results from single parameter assessments are often confounded by measurement uncertainty. Model biases in land surface albedos can and must be corrected to accurately calculate TOA flux. We also compare the AOD trend from three models with the observation‐based counterpart. These models reproduce all notable trends in AOD except the decreasing trend over eastern China and the adjacent oceanic regions due to limitations in the emission data set.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Satellite-Based Evaluation of AeroCom Model Bias in Biomass Burning Regions
- Author
-
Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Tero Mielonen, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Harri Kokkola, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu, Svetlana G. Tsyro, Gabriele Curci, Anna Protonotariou, Ben Johnson, Joyce E. Penner, Nicolas Bellouin, Ragnhild B. Skeie, and Gunnar Myhre
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Global models are widely used to simulate biomass burning aerosol (BBA). Exhaustive evaluations on model representation of aerosol distributions and properties are fundamental to assess health and climate impacts of BBA. Here we conducted a comprehensive comparison of Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project model simulations with satellite observations. A total of 59 runs by 18 models from three AeroCom Phase-III experiments (i.e., biomass burning emissions, CTRL16, and CTRL19) and 14 satellite products of aerosols were used in the study. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm was investigated during the fire season over three key fire regions reflecting different fire dynamics (i.e., deforestation-dominated Amazon, Southern Hemisphere Africa where savannas are the key source of emissions, and boreal forest burning in boreal North America). The 14 satellite products were first evaluated against AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) observations, with large uncertainties found. But these uncertainties had small impacts on the model evaluation that was dominated by modeling bias. Through a comparison with Polarization and Directionality of the Earth’s Reflectances measurements with the Generalized Retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Properties algorithm (POLDER-GRASP), we found that the modeled AOD values were biased by −93 % to 152 %, with most models showing significant underestimations even for the state-of-the-art aerosol modeling techniques (i.e., CTRL19). By scaling up BBA emissions, the negative biases in modeled AOD were significantly mitigated, although it yielded only negligible improvements in the correlation between models and observations, and the spatial and temporal variations in AOD biases did not change much. For models in CTRL16 and CTRL19, the large diversity in modeled AOD was in almost equal measures caused by diversity in emissions, lifetime, and the mass extinction coefficient (MEC). We found that in the AeroCom ensemble, BBA lifetime correlated significantly with particle deposition (as expected) and in turn correlated strongly with precipitation. Additional analysis based on Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aerosol profiles suggested that the altitude of the aerosol layer in the current models was generally too low, which also contributed to the bias in modeled lifetime. Modeled MECs exhibited significant correlations with the Ångström exponent (AE, an indicator of particle size). Comparisons with the POLDER-GRASP-observed AE suggested that the models tended to overestimate the AE (underestimated particle size), indicating a possible underestimation of MECs in models. The hygroscopic growth in most models generally agreed with observations and might not explain the overall underestimation of modeled AOD. Our results imply that current global models contain biases in important aerosol processes for BBA (e.g., emissions, removal, and optical properties) that remain to be addressed in future research.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Aerosol Absorption in Global Models From AeroCom Phase III
- Author
-
Maria Sand, Bjørn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Jonas Gliß, Susanne E. Bauer, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Paul Ginoux, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Harri Kokkola, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne T. Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Twan van Noije, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Samuel Remy, Michael Schulz, Philip Stier, Camilla W. Stjern, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana G. Tsyro, and Duncan Watson-Parris
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Aerosol-induced absorption of shortwave radiation can modify the climate through local atmospheric heating, which affects lapse rates, precipitation, and cloud formation. Presently, the total amount of aerosol absorption is poorly constrained, and the main absorbing aerosol species (black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA), and mineral dust) are diversely quantified in global climate models. As part of the third phase of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) intercomparison initiative (AeroCom phase III), we here document the distribution and magnitude of aerosol absorption in current global aerosol models and quantify the sources of intermodel spread, highlighting the difficulties of attributing absorption to different species. In total, 15 models have provided total present-day absorption at 550 nm (using year 2010 emissions), 11 of which have provided absorption per absorbing species. The multi-model global annual mean total absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) is 0.0054 (0.0020 to 0.0098; 550 nm), with the range given as the minimum and maximum model values. This is 28 % higher compared to the 0.0042 (0.0021 to 0.0076) multi-model mean in AeroCom phase II (using year 2000 emissions), but the difference is within 1 standard deviation, which, in this study, is 0.0023 (0.0019 in Phase II). Of the summed component AAOD, 60 % (range 36 %–84 %) is estimated to be due to BC, 31 % (12 %–49 %) is due to dust, and 11 % (0 %–24 %) is due to OA; however, the components are not independent in terms of their absorbing efficiency. In models with internal mixtures of absorbing aerosols, a major challenge is the lack of a common and simple method to attribute absorption to the different absorbing species. Therefore, when possible, the models with internally mixed aerosols in the present study have performed simulations using the same method for estimating absorption due to BC, OA, and dust, namely by removing it and comparing runs with and without the absorbing species. We discuss the challenges of attributing absorption to different species; we compare burden, refractive indices, and density; and we contrast models with internal mixing to models with external mixing. The model mean BC mass absorption coefficient (MAC) value is 10.1 (3.1 to 17.7) m2 g−1 (550 nm), and the model mean BC AAOD is 0.0030 (0.0007 to 0.0077). The difference in lifetime (and burden) in the models explains as much of the BC AAOD spread as the difference in BC MAC values. The difference in the spectral dependency between the models is striking. Several models have an absorption Ångstrøm exponent (AAE) close to 1, which likely is too low given current knowledge of spectral aerosol optical properties. Most models do not account for brown carbon and underestimate the spectral dependency for OA.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance
- Author
-
Jasper F. Kok, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R Colarco, Douglas S. Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito, Martina Klose, Danny M. Leung, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Ron L Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, Carlos Pérez García‐Pando, Adriana Rocha Lima, Jessica S. Wan, and Chloe A. Whicker
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accurately represent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors are partially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission in coarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysical properties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodology that yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We present an analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensemble of global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth. We then compare the inverse model results against independent measurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find that errors are reduced by approximately a factor of 2 relative to current model simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse model results show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere, most likely because both the model simulations and the observational constraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis, we find that the emission flux of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm (PM20) is approximately 5000 Tg yr−1, which is greater than most models account for. This larger PM20 dust flux is needed to match observational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarse dust. We obtain gridded datasets of dust emission, vertically integrated loading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet and dry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As our results indicate that this dataset is more accurate than current model simulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used to improve quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Contribution of the World's Main Dust Source Regions to the Global Cycle of Desert Dust
- Author
-
Jasper F. Kok, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R Colarco, Douglas S. Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito, Martina Klose, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Ron L Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Adriana Rocha Lima, and Jessica S. Wan
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, the relative contributions of the world's major source regions to the global dust cycle remain poorly constrained. This problem hinders accounting for the potentially large impact of regional differences in dust properties on clouds, the Earth's energy balance, and terrestrial and marine biogeochemical cycles. Here, we constrain the contribution of each of the world's main dust source regions to the global dust cycle. We use an analytical framework that integrates an ensemble of global aerosol model simulations with observationally informed constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth (DAOD). We obtain a dataset that constrains the relative contribution of nine major source regions to size-resolved dust emission, atmospheric loading, DAOD, concentration, and deposition flux. We find that the 22–29 Tg (1 standard error range) global loading of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm is partitioned as follows: North African source regions contribute ∼ 50 % (11–15 Tg), Asian source regions contribute ∼ 40 % (8–13 Tg), and North American and Southern Hemisphere regions contribute ∼ 10 % (1.8–3.2 Tg). These results suggest that current models on average overestimate the contribution of North African sources to atmospheric dust loading at ∼ 65 %, while underestimating the contribution of Asian dust at ∼ 30 %. Our results further show that each source region's dust loading peaks in local spring and summer, which is partially driven by increased dust lifetime in those seasons. We also quantify the dust deposition flux to the Amazon rainforest to be ∼ 10 Tg yr−1, which is a factor of 2–3 less than inferred from satellite data by previous work that likely overestimated dust deposition by underestimating the dust mass extinction efficiency. The data obtained in this paper can be used to obtain improved constraints on dust impacts on clouds, climate, biogeochemical cycles, and other parts of the Earth system.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Climate-driven Chemistry and Aerosol Feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth System Models
- Author
-
Gillian Thornhill, William Collins, Dirk Olivie, Ragnhild B Skeie, Alex Archibald, Susanne E Bauer, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Stephanie Fiedler, Gerd Folberth, Ada Gjermundsen, Larry Horowitz, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Martine Michou, Jane Mulcahy, Pierre Nabat, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M O’Connor, Fabien Paulot, Michael Schulz, Catherine E Scott, Roland Seferian, Chris Smith, Toshihiko Takemura, Simone Tilmes, Konstantinos Tsigaridis, and James Weber
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Feedbacks play a fundamental role in determining the magnitude of the response of the climate system to external forcing, such as from anthropogenic emissions. The latest generation of Earth system models includes aerosol and chemistry components that interact with each other and with the biosphere. These interactions introduce a complex web of feedbacks that is important to understand and quantify. This paper addresses multiple pathways for aerosol and chemical feedbacks in Earth system models. These focus on changes in natural emissions (dust, sea salt, dimethyl sulfide, biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) and lightning) and changes in reaction rates for methane and ozone chemistry. The feedback terms are then given by the sensitivity of a pathway to climate change multiplied by the radiative effect of the change. We find that the overall climate feedback through chemistry and aerosols is negative in the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) Earth system models due to increased negative forcing from aerosols in a climate with warmer surface temperatures following a quadrupling of CO2 concentrations. This is principally due to increased emissions of sea salt and BVOCs which are sensitive to climate change and cause strong negative radiative forcings. Increased chemical loss of ozone and methane also contributes to a negative feedback. However, overall methane lifetime is expected to increase in a warmer climate due to increased BVOCs. Increased emissions of methane from wetlands would also offset some of the negative feedbacks. The CMIP6 experimental design did not allow the methane lifetime or methane emission changes to affect climate, so we found a robust negative contribution from interactive aerosols and chemistry to climate sensitivity in CMIP6 Earth system models.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols - a multi-model comparison
- Author
-
Gillian D. Thornhill, William J. Collins, Ryan J. Kramer, Dirk Olivié, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Fiona O’Connor, Nathan Luke Abraham, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Susanne E. Bauer, Makoto Deushi, Louisa K. Emmons, Piers M. Forster, Larry W. Horowitz, Ben Johnson, James Keeble, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Jane P. Mulcahy, Gunnar Myhre, Pierre Nabat, Vaishali Naik, Naga Oshima, Michael Schulz, Christopher J. Smith, Toshihiko Takemura, Simone Tilmes, Tongwen Wu, Guang Zeng, and Jie Zhang
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
This paper quantifies the pre-industrial (1850) to present-day (2014) effective radiative forcing (ERF) of anthropogenic emissions of NOX, volatile organic compounds (VOCs; including CO), SO2, NH3, black carbon, organic carbon, and concentrations of methane, N2O and ozone-depleting halocarbons, using CMIP6 models. Concentration and emission changes of reactive species can cause multiple changes in the composition of radiatively active species: tropospheric ozone, stratospheric ozone, stratospheric water vapour, secondary inorganic and organic aerosol, and methane. Where possible we break down the ERFs from each emitted species into the contributions from the composition changes. The ERFs are calculated for each of the models that participated in the AerChemMIP experiments as part of the CMIP6 project, where the relevant model output was available. The 1850 to 2014 multi-model mean ERFs (± standard deviations) are −1.03 ± 0.37 W/sq.m for SO2 emissions, −0.25 ± 0.09 W/sq.m for organic carbon (OC), 0.15 ± 0.17 W/sq.m for black carbon (BC) and −0.07 ± 0.01 W/sq.m for NH3. For the combined aerosols (in the piClim-aer experiment) it is −1.01 ± 0.25 W/sq.m. The multi-model means for the reactive well-mixed greenhouse gases (including any effects on ozone and aerosol chemistry) are 0.67 ± 0.17 W/sq.m for methane (CH4), 0.26 ± 0.07 W/sq.m for nitrous oxide (N2O) and 0.12 ± 0.2 W/sq.m for ozone-depleting halocarbons (HC). Emissions of the ozone precursors nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds and both together (O3) lead to ERFs of 0.14 ± 0.13, 0.09 ± 0.14 and 0.20 ± 0.07 W/sq.m respectively. The differences in ERFs calculated for the different models reflect differences in the complexity of their aerosol and chemistry schemes, especially in the case of methane where tropospheric chemistry captures increased forcing from ozone production.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. AeroCom Phase III Multi-Model Evaluation of the Aerosol Life Cycle and Optical Properties Using Ground and Space-Based Remote Sensing as Well as Surface In Situ Observations
- Author
-
Jonas Glib, Augustin Mortier, Michael Schulz, Elizabeth Andrews, Yves Balkanski, Susanne E Bauer, Anna M K Benedictow, Huisheng Bian, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Paul Ginoux, Jan J Griesfeller, Andreas Heckel, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevag, Harri Kokkola, Paolo Laj, Phillippe Le Sager, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Hitoshi Matsu, Gunnar Myhre, David Neubauer, Twan van Noije, Peter North, Dirk J L Olivie, Samuel Remy, Larisa Sogacheva, Toshihiko Takemura, Konstantinos Tsigaridis, and Svetlana G Tsyro
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
Within the framework of the AeroCom (Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models) initiative, the state-of-the-art modelling of aerosol optical properties is assessed from 14 global models participating in the phase III control experiment (AP3). The models are similar to CMIP6/AerChemMIP Earth System Models (ESMs) and provide a robust multi-model ensemble. Inter-model spread of aerosol species lifetimes and emissions appears to be similar to that of mass extinction coefficients (MECs), suggesting that aerosol optical depth (AOD) uncertainties are associated with a broad spectrum of parameterised aerosol processes. Total AOD is approximately the same as in AeroCom phase I (AP1) simulations. However, we find a 50 % decrease in the optical depth (OD) of black carbon (BC), attributable to a combination of decreased emissions and lifetimes. Relative contributions from sea salt (SS) and dust (DU) have shifted from being approximately equal in AP1 to SS contributing about 2∕3 of the natural AOD in AP3. This shift is linked with a decrease in DU mass burden, a lower DU MEC, and a slight decrease in DU lifetime, suggesting coarser DU particle sizes in AP3 compared to AP1. Relative to observations, the AP3 ensemble median and most of the participating models underestimate all aerosol optical properties investigated, that is, total AOD as well as fine and coarse AOD (AODf, AODc), Ångström exponent (AE), dry surface scattering (SCdry), and absorption (ACdry) coefficients. Compared to AERONET, the models underestimate total AOD by ca. 21 % ± 20 % (as inferred from the ensemble median and interquartile range). Against satellite data, the ensemble AOD biases range from −37 % (MODIS-Terra) to −16 % (MERGED-FMI, a multi-satellite AOD product), which we explain by differences between individual satellites and AERONET measurements themselves. Correlation coefficients (R) between model and observation AOD records are generally high (R>0.75), suggesting that the models are capable of capturing spatio-temporal variations in AOD. We find a much larger underestimate in coarse AODc (∼ −45 % ± 25 %) than in fine AODf (∼ −15 % ± 25 %) with slightly increased inter-model spread compared to total AOD. These results indicate problems in the modelling of DU and SS. The AODc bias is likely due to missing DU over continental land masses (particularly over the United States, SE Asia, and S. America), while marine AERONET sites and the AATSR SU satellite data suggest more moderate oceanic biases in AODc. Column AEs are underestimated by about 10 % ± 16 %. For situations in which measurements show AE > 2, models underestimate AERONET AE by ca. 35 %. In contrast, all models (but one) exhibit large overestimates in AE when coarse aerosol dominates (bias ca. +140 % if observed AE < 0.5). Simulated AE does not span the observed AE variability. These results indicate that models overestimate particle size (or underestimate the fine-mode fraction) for fine-dominated aerosol and underestimate size (or overestimate the fine-mode fraction) for coarse-dominated aerosol. This must have implications for lifetime, water uptake, scattering enhancement, and the aerosol radiative effect, which we can not quantify at this moment. Comparison against Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) in situ data results in mean bias and inter-model variations of −35 % ± 25 % and −20 % ± 18 % for SCdry and ACdry, respectively. The larger underestimate of SCdry than ACdry suggests the models will simulate an aerosol single scattering albedo that is too low. The larger underestimate of SCdry than ambient air AOD is consistent with recent findings that models overestimate scattering enhancement due to hygroscopic growth. The broadly consistent negative bias in AOD and surface scattering suggests an underestimate of aerosol radiative effects in current global aerosol models. Considerable inter-model diversity in the simulated optical properties is often found in regions that are, unfortunately, not or only sparsely covered by ground-based observations. This includes, for instance, the Sahara, Amazonia, central Australia, and the South Pacific. This highlights the need for a better site coverage in the observations, which would enable us to better assess the models, but also the performance of satellite products in these regions. Using fine-mode AOD as a proxy for present-day aerosol forcing estimates, our results suggest that models underestimate aerosol forcing by ca. −15 %, however, with a considerably large interquartile range, suggesting a spread between −35 % and +10 %.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. An assessment of the performance of bias correction techniques for surface ozone burdens simulated by global chemistry-climate models
- Author
-
Christoph Stähle, Harald E. Rieder, Arlene M. Fiore, and Ramiro Checa-Garcia
- Abstract
Despite continuous improvement during recent decades, state of the art global chemistry-climate models (CCMs) are still showing biases compared to observational data, illustrating remaining difficulties and challenges in the simulation of atmospheric processes governing ozone production and decay. Therefore, CCM output is frequently bias-corrected in studies seeking to explore changing air quality burdens and associated impacts on human health (e.g., Rieder et al., 2018). Here we assess the strengths and limitations of different bias correction techniques for CCM simulations with focus on maximum daily 8-hour average surface ozone. Ozone fields are chosen as ozone is known as regional pollutant and thus shows smaller spatial heterogeneity in its burden than e.g. particulate matter. Within our comparison a set of different innovative, as well as, common bias correction techniques are applied to output of selected global coupled CCMs contributing hindcast simulations to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). For bias correction and evaluation, we utilize gridded observational data for the European and US domains according to Schnell et al. [2014]. The statistical bias-correction techniques applied and compared are quantile mapping, delta-function, relative and mean bias correction. As surface ozone pollution is commonly associated with a strong seasonal cycle, the adjustment techniques are applied to model data on monthly basis, and skill scores for individual bias correction techniques are compared across individual CMIP6 models for both seasonal and annual timescales over the period 1995-2014. Our results highlight large differences among individual bias correction techniques and advocate for the use of more complex correction strategies involving corrections across the spatio-temporal distribution of the ozone field.References:Rieder, H.E., Fiore A.M., Clifton, O.E., Correa, G., Horowitz, L.W., Naik, V.: Combining model projections with site-level observations to estimate changes in distributions and seasonality of ozone in surface air over the U.S.A., Atmos. Env., 193, 302-315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.042, 2018.Schnell, J. L., Holmes, C. D., Jangam, A., and Prather, M. J.: Skill in forecasting extreme ozone pollution episodes with a global atmospheric chemistry model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7721–7739, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7721-2014, 2014.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Better representation of dust can improve climate models with too weak an African monsoon
- Author
-
Jérôme Servonnat, Rémy Bonnet, Yves Balkanski, Olivier Boucher, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), and Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,0303 health sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Moisture ,Advection ,Physics ,QC1-999 ,Atmospheric sciences ,Monsoon ,01 natural sciences ,Aerosol ,03 medical and health sciences ,Chemistry ,13. Climate action ,Environmental science ,Climate model ,Precipitation ,Absorption (electromagnetic radiation) ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,QD1-999 ,Water vapor ,030304 developmental biology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
The amount of short wave radiation absorbed by dust has remained uncertain. We have developed a more accurate representation of dust absorption that is based on the observed dust mineralogical composition and accounts for very large particles. We analyze the results from two fully coupled climate simulations of 100 years in terms of their simulated precipitation patterns against observations. A striking benefit of the new dust optical and physical properties is that tropical precipitation over the Sahel, tropical North Atlantic and West Indian Ocean are significantly improved compared to observations, without degrading precipitations elsewhere. This alleviates a common persistent bias in Earth system models that exhibit a summer African monsoon that does not reach far enough north. We show that the improvements documented here for the IPSL-CM61 climate model result from both a thermodynamical and dynamical response to dust absorption, which is unrelated to natural variability. Aerosol absorption induces more water vapor advection from the ocean to the Sahel region, thereby providing an added supply of moisture available for precipitation. This work, thus, provides a path towards improving precipitation patterns in these regions by accounting for both physical and optical properties of the aerosol more realistically.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Separating the shortwave and longwave components of greenhouse gas radiative forcing
- Author
-
Rachael Byrom, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, and Keith Shine
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Analysis of the dependency of atmospheric formaldehyde - as a proxy for bVOC emissions - on vegetation status over a Central European city and potential implications for surface ozone exceedances
- Author
-
Heidelinde Trimmel, Monika Mayer, Stefan Schreier, Christian Schmidt, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Josef Eitzinger, Anne Charlott Fitzky, Thomas Karl, Peter Huszár, Jan Karlický, Paul Hamer, Philipp Koehler, and Christian Frankenberg
- Abstract
In the city centre of Vienna, Austria ozone (maximum 8 hour mean) mda8 exceedances of the threshold value of 120 μg/m³ can occur from as early as March until September, which coincides with the main local vegetation season. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (bVOCs), which are mainly emitted by forests, but also other vegetation as agricultural field crops and are precursor substances to atmospheric formaldehyde (HCHO). Thereby they contribute to the production of ozone in and around the city. On the other hand, vegetated areas reduce the ozone concentration by uptake via stomatal and cuticular pathways and soil uptake.In this study the dependency of HCHO mixing ratios, obtained from path averaged MAX-DOAS UV retrievals over the Vienna city centre, on meteorological parameters (air temperature, global radiation, boundary layer height) and vegetation drought stress indicators are analysed, focusing on the difference between drought and non-drought conditions. Following indicators are used: standardized precipitation index (SPI), relative soil saturation from the Agricultural Risk Information System (ARIS), vapour pressure deficit and satellite-based photosynthetically active radiation anomaly (fAPAR) as well as solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF).A clear dependency of the HCHO on vegetation-related parameters and the area of origin of HCHO and its precursor substances is found. However, the strength of the relationship between the parameters changes depending on the vegetation status. The results of the observational HCHO analyses spanning 2017-2021 are compared with bVOCs estimates of the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). The observed ozone concentrations are compared with the ozone mixing ratios and dry deposition rates calculated by the chemical transport model developed at Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West within the European Monitoring and Evaluation Program (EMEP MSC-W model), which includes the Deposition of Ozone for Stomatal Exchange (DO3SE) model, to better understand timing and magnitudes of sources and sinks. Possible consequences for exceedances of the mda8 ozone target value in the study region are discussed.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Supplementary material to 'Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions'
- Author
-
Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Tero Mielonen, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Harri Kokkola, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu, Svetlana G. Tsyro, Gabriele Curci, Anna Protonotariou, Ben Johnson, Joyce E. Penner, Nicolas Bellouin, Ragnhild B. Skeie, and Gunnar Myhre
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III
- Author
-
Harri Kokkola, Bjørn Hallvard Samset, Duncan Watson-Parris, Philippe Le Sager, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Twan van Noije, Jonas Gliß, Kostas Tsigaridis, Alf Kirkevåg, Paul Ginoux, Mian Chin, Maria Sand, Philip Stier, Susanne E. Bauer, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, Camilla Weum Stjern, Hitoshi Matsui, Huisheng Bian, Zak Kipling, Svetlana Tsyro, Samuel Remy, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Toshihiko Takemura, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Maria Sand, Bjørn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre Camilla W. Stjern, and Marianne T. Lund have been supported by the Research Council of Norway (grantnos. 244141 (NetBC), 315195 (ACCEPT), 250573 (SUPER), and 248834 (QUISARC)). Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Alf Kirkevåg, and Michael Schulz were supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 grant (grant no. 641816, CRESCENDO). Hitoshi Matsui was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (MEXT/JSPS), KAKENHI (grantnos. JP17H04709, JP19H05699, and JP20H00638), the MEXT Arctic Challenge for Sustainability II (ArCS-II) project (grant no. JPMXD1420318865), and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund 2–2003 (grant no. JPMEERF20202003) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency. Toshihiko Takemura was supported by the NEC SX supercomputer system of the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan, the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant no. JPMEERF20202F01) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency, Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant no. JP19H05669), and Philip Stier acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) project RECAP under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 724602). Duncan Watson-Parris and Philippe Le Sager acknowledge support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (grant nos. NE/P013406/1 (A-CURE) and NE/S005390/1 (ACRUISE)), and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme iMIRACLI under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (grant no. 860100). Michael Schulz, Alf Kirkevåg, and Dirk J. L. Olivié acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, project FORCeS (grant no. 821205), by the Research Council of Norway INES (grant no. 270061), and KeyClim (grant no. 295046). The AeroCom database is maintained by the computing infrastructure efforts provided by the Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,0303 health sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Physics ,QC1-999 ,Lapse rate ,Mineral dust ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Standard deviation ,Aerosol ,Chemistry ,03 medical and health sciences ,13. Climate action ,Environmental science ,Shortwave radiation ,Precipitation ,Mass attenuation coefficient ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,Absorption (electromagnetic radiation) ,QD1-999 ,030304 developmental biology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Aerosol-induced absorption of shortwave radiation can modify the climate through local atmospheric heating, which affects lapse rates, precipitation, and cloud formation. Presently, the total amount of aerosol absorption is poorly constrained, and the main absorbing aerosol species (black carbon (BC), organic aerosols (OA), and mineral dust) are diversely quantified in global climate models. As part of the third phase of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) intercomparison initiative (AeroCom phase III), we here document the distribution and magnitude of aerosol absorption in current global aerosol models and quantify the sources of intermodel spread, highlighting the difficulties of attributing absorption to different species. In total, 15 models have provided total present-day absorption at 550 nm (using year 2010 emissions), 11 of which have provided absorption per absorbing species. The multi-model global annual mean total absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) is 0.0054 (0.0020 to 0.0098; 550 nm), with the range given as the minimum and maximum model values. This is 28 % higher compared to the 0.0042 (0.0021 to 0.0076) multi-model mean in AeroCom phase II (using year 2000 emissions), but the difference is within 1 standard deviation, which, in this study, is 0.0023 (0.0019 in Phase II). Of the summed component AAOD, 60 % (range 36 %–84 %) is estimated to be due to BC, 31 % (12 %–49 %) is due to dust, and 11 % (0 %–24 %) is due to OA; however, the components are not independent in terms of their absorbing efficiency. In models with internal mixtures of absorbing aerosols, a major challenge is the lack of a common and simple method to attribute absorption to the different absorbing species. Therefore, when possible, the models with internally mixed aerosols in the present study have performed simulations using the same method for estimating absorption due to BC, OA, and dust, namely by removing it and comparing runs with and without the absorbing species. We discuss the challenges of attributing absorption to different species; we compare burden, refractive indices, and density; and we contrast models with internal mixing to models with external mixing. The model mean BC mass absorption coefficient (MAC) value is 10.1 (3.1 to 17.7) m2 g−1 (550 nm), and the model mean BC AAOD is 0.0030 (0.0007 to 0.0077). The difference in lifetime (and burden) in the models explains as much of the BC AAOD spread as the difference in BC MAC values. The difference in the spectral dependency between the models is striking. Several models have an absorption Ångstrøm exponent (AAE) close to 1, which likely is too low given current knowledge of spectral aerosol optical properties. Most models do not account for brown carbon and underestimate the spectral dependency for OA.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Reply on RC1
- Author
-
Ramiro Checa-Garcia
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapor changes in CMIP6 models from 1850-2100
- Author
-
Peer Nowack, Antara Banerjee, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Guang Zeng, Veronika Eyring, James Keeble, Sean M. Davis, Olaf Morgenstern, Jiankai Zhang, Gabriel Chiodo, Birgit Hassler, and Paul T. Griffiths
- Subjects
Ozone layer ,Environmental science ,Atmospheric sciences ,Water vapor - Abstract
Stratospheric ozone and water vapor are key components of the Earth system, and past and future changes to both have important impacts on global and regional climate. Here we evaluate long-term changes in these species from the pre-industrial (1850) to the end of the 21st century in CMIP6 models under a range of future emissions scenarios. There is good agreement between the CMIP multi-model mean and observations for total column ozone (TCO), although there is substantial variation between the individual CMIP6 models. For the CMIP6 multi-model mean, global mean TCO has increased from ~300 DU in 1850 to ~305 DU in 1960, before rapidly declining in the 1970s and 1980s following the use and emission of halogenated ozone depleting substances (ODSs). TCO is projected to return to 1960’s values by the middle of the 21st century under the SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP4-3.4, SSP4-6.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, and under the SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios TCO values are projected to be ~10 DU higher than the 1960’s values by 2100. However, under the SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-1.6 scenarios, TCO is not projected to return to the 1960’s values despite reductions in halogenated ODSs due to decreases in tropospheric ozone mixing ratios. This global pattern is similar to regional patterns, except in the tropics where TCO under most scenarios is not projected to return to 1960’s values, either through reductions in tropospheric ozone under SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, or through reductions in lower stratospheric ozone resulting from an acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation under other SSPs. In contrast to TCO, there is poorer agreement between the CMIP6 multi-model mean and observed lower stratospheric water vapour mixing ratios, with the CMIP6 multi-model mean underestimating observed water vapour mixing ratios by ~0.5 ppmv at 70hPa. CMIP6 multi-model mean stratospheric water vapor mixing ratios in the tropical lower stratosphere have increased by ~0.5 ppmv from the pre-industrial to the present day and are projected to increase further by the end of the 21st century. The largest increases (~2 ppmv) are simulated under the future scenarios with the highest assumed forcing pathway (e.g. SSP5-8.5). Tropical lower stratospheric water vapor, and to a lesser extent TCO, show large variations following explosive volcanic eruptions.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Supplementary material to 'Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom Phase III'
- Author
-
Maria Sand, Bjørn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Jonas Gliß, Susanne E. Bauer, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Paul Ginoux, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Harri Kokkola, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne T. Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Twan van Noije, Samuel Remy, Michael Schulz, Philip Stier, Camilla W. Stjern, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana G. Tsyro, and Duncan Watson-Parris
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Supplementary material to 'Contribution of the world's main dust source regions to the global cycle of desert dust'
- Author
-
Jasper F. Kok, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R. Colarco, Douglas S. Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito, Martina Klose, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Ron L. Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Adriana Rocha-Lima, and Jessica S. Wan
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Supplementary material to 'Dust Induced Atmospheric Absorption Improves Tropical Precipitations In Climate Models'
- Author
-
Yves Balkanski, Rémy Bonnet, Olivier Boucher, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, and Jérôme Servonnat
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Understanding Top-of-Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear-Sky Perspective
- Author
-
Gunnar Myhre, Michael Schulz, Susanne E. Bauer, Wenying Su, Kostas Tsigaridis, Lusheng Liang, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Norman G. Loeb, Hitoshi Matsui, Fabien Paulot, Tyler J. Thorsen, Toshihiko Takemura, Paul Ginoux, David Neubauer, Gregory L. Schuster, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Physical geography ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,media_common.quotation_subject ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Flux ,[SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences ,GC1-1581 ,02 engineering and technology ,surface albedo ,Oceanography ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Atmosphere ,Radiative flux ,Phase (matter) ,Environmental Chemistry ,021101 geological & geomatics engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,media_common ,Global and Planetary Change ,Perspective (graphical) ,aerosols ,radiative flux ,GB3-5030 ,Sky ,13. Climate action ,[SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science - Abstract
Biases in aerosol optical depths (AOD) and land surface albedos in the AeroCom models are manifested in the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) clear-sky reflected shortwave (SW) fluxes. Biases in the SW fluxes from AeroCom models are quantitatively related to biases in AOD and land surface albedo by using their radiative kernels. Over ocean, AOD contributes about 25% to the urn:x-wiley:19422466:media:jame21429:jame21429-math-0001S–urn:x-wiley:19422466:media:jame21429:jame21429-math-0002N mean SW flux bias for the multi-model mean (MMM) result. Over land, AOD and land surface albedo contribute about 40% and 30%, respectively, to the urn:x-wiley:19422466:media:jame21429:jame21429-math-0003S–urn:x-wiley:19422466:media:jame21429:jame21429-math-0004N mean SW flux bias for the MMM result. Furthermore, the spatial patterns of the SW flux biases derived from the radiative kernels are very similar to those between models and CERES observation, with the correlation coefficient of 0.6 over ocean and 0.76 over land for MMM using data of 2010. Satellite data used in this evaluation are derived independently from each other, consistencies in their bias patterns when compared with model simulations suggest that these patterns are robust. This highlights the importance of evaluating related variables in a synergistic manner to provide an unambiguous assessment of the models, as results from single parameter assessments are often confounded by measurement uncertainty. Model biases in land surface albedos can and must be corrected to accurately calculate TOA flux. We also compare the AOD trend from three models with the observation-based counterpart. These models reproduce all notable trends in AOD except the decreasing trend over eastern China and the adjacent oceanic regions due to limitations in the emission data set.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100
- Author
-
James Keeble, Birgit Hassler, Antara Banerjee, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Gabriel Chiodo, Sean Davis, Veronika Eyring, Paul T. Griffiths, Olaf Morgenstern, Peer Nowack, Guang Zeng, Jiankai Zhang, Greg Bodeker, Susannah Burrows, Philip Cameron-Smith, David Cugnet, Christopher Danek, Makoto Deushi, Larry W. Horowitz, Anne Kubin, Lijuan Li, Gerrit Lohmann, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Pierre Nabat, Di
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): Mineral dust
- Author
-
F. M. O'Connor, P. Le Sager, Tommi Bergman, Kenneth S. Carslaw, T. P. C. van Noije, Béatrice Marticorena, Christopher Dearden, Samuel Albani, Joseph M. Prospero, Cat Scott, Michael Schulz, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Yves Balkanski, Anne Cozic, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Pierre Nabat, Martine Michou, Checa-Garcia, R, Balkanski, Y, Albani, S, Bergman, T, Carslaw, K, Cozic, A, Dearden, C, Marticorena, B, Michou, M, Van Noije, T, Nabat, P, O'Connor, F, Olivie, D, Prospero, J, Le Sager, P, Schulz, M, Scott, C, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA (UMR_7583)), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences [Milano], Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science [Leeds] (ICAS), School of Earth and Environment [Leeds] (SEE), University of Leeds-University of Leeds, Calcul Scientifique (CALCULS), Centre of Excellence for Modelling the Atmosphere and Climate (CEMAC), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Groupe de Météorologie de Grande Échelle et Climat (GMGEC), Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Change (MOHC), United Kingdom Met Office [Exeter], Norwegian Meteorological Institute [Oslo] (MET), University of Miami [Coral Gables], ANR-19-CE01-0008,CLIMDO,Alteration des poussières minerales par les composés organiques volatiles d'interet climatique(2019), European Project: 708119,H2020,H2020-MSCA-IF-2015,DUSC3(2016), European Project: 641816,H2020,H2020-SC5-2014-two-stage,CRESCENDO(2015), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca [Milano] (UNIMIB), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), and Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,QC1-999 ,Mineral dust ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Radiative transfer ,Earth System Model ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,QD1-999 ,Aerosol ,Optical depth ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,Climate Model ,Physics ,Dust ,Radiative forcing ,AERONET ,Chemistry ,Deposition (aerosol physics) ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer ,Radiative Forcing - Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the mineral dust aerosol modelled by five Earth system models (ESMs) within the project entitled Coordinated Research in Earth Systems and Climate: Experiments, kNowledge, Dissemination and Outreach (CRESCENDO). We quantify the global dust cycle described by each model in terms of global emissions, together with dry and wet deposition, reporting large differences in the ratio of dry over wet deposition across the models not directly correlated with the range of particle sizes emitted. The multi-model mean dust emissions with five ESMs is 2836 Tg yr−1 but with a large uncertainty due mainly to the difference in the maximum dust particle size emitted. The multi-model mean of the subset of four ESMs without particle diameters larger than 10 µ m is 1664 (σ=651) Tg yr−1. Total dust emissions in the simulations with identical nudged winds from reanalysis give us better consistency between models; i.e. the multi-model mean global emissions with three ESMs are 1613 (σ=278) Tg yr−1, but 1834 (σ=666) Tg yr−1 without nudged winds and the same models. Significant discrepancies in the globally averaged dust mass extinction efficiency explain why even models with relatively similar global dust load budgets can display strong differences in dust optical depth. The comparison against observations has been done in terms of dust optical depths based on MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) satellite products, showing global consistency in terms of preferential dust sources and transport across the Atlantic. The global localisation of source regions is consistent with MODIS, but we found regional and seasonal differences between models and observations when we quantified the cross-correlation of time series over dust-emitting regions. To faithfully compare local emissions between models we introduce a re-gridded normalisation method that can also be compared with satellite products derived from dust event frequencies. Dust total deposition is compared with an instrumental network to assess global and regional differences. We find that models agree with observations within a factor of 10 for data stations distant from dust sources, but the approximations of dust particle size distribution at emission contributed to a misrepresentation of the actual range of deposition values when instruments are close to dust-emitting regions. The observed dust surface concentrations also are reproduced to within a factor of 10. The comparison of total aerosol optical depth with AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) stations where dust is dominant shows large differences between models, although with an increase in the inter-model consistency when the simulations are conducted with nudged winds. The increase in the model ensemble consistency also means better agreement with observations, which we have ascertained for dust total deposition, surface concentrations and optical depths (against both AERONET and MODIS retrievals). We introduce a method to ascertain the contributions per mode consistent with the multi-modal direct radiative effects, which we apply to study the direct radiative effects of a multi-modal representation of the dust particle size distribution that includes the largest particles.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Dust Induced Atmospheric Absorption Improves Tropical Precipitations In Climate Models
- Author
-
Yves Balkanski, Rémy Bonnet, Jérôme Servonnat, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, and Olivier Boucher
- Subjects
Advection ,Environmental science ,Atmospheric absorption ,Climate model ,Precipitation ,Shortwave radiation ,Monsoon ,Absorption (electromagnetic radiation) ,Atmospheric sciences ,Water vapor ,Aerosol - Abstract
The amount of shortwave radiation absorbed by dust has remained uncertain. We have developed a more accurate representation of dust absorption that is based on the observed dust mineralogical composition and accounts for very large particles. We analyze the results from two fully-coupled climate simulations of 100 years in terms of their simulated precipitation patterns against observations. A striking benefit of the new dust optical and physical properties is that tropical precipitations over Sahel, tropical North Atlantic and West Indian Ocean are significantly improved compared to observations, without degrading precipitations elsewhere. This alleviates a persistent bias in earth system models that exhibit a summer African monsoon that does not reach far enough North. We show that the improvement results from a thermodynamical and dynamical response to dust absorption is unrelated to natural variability. Aerosol absorption induces more water vapor advection from the ocean to the Sahel, thereby providing an added supply of moisture available for precipitation. This work thus provides a path towards improving precipitation patterns in these regions by more realistically accounting for both physical and optical properties of the aerosol.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations
- Author
-
A. Heckel, Philippe Le Sager, Paul Ginoux, Hitoshi Matsui, David Neubauer, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Mian Chin, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Samuel Remy, Jan Griesfeller, Huisheng Bian, Harri Kokkola, Yves Balkanski, Svetlana Tsyro, Alf Kirkevåg, Twan van Noije, Susanne E. Bauer, Jonas Gliß, Toshihiko Takemura, Larisa Sogacheva, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Elisabeth Andrews, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Gunnar Myhre, Kostas Tsigaridis, Augustin Mortier, Michael Schulz, Zak Kipling, Peter North, Anna Benedictow, Paolo Laj, Norwegian Meteorological Institute [Oslo] (MET), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado [Boulder]-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Swansea University, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Graduate School of Environmental Studies [Nagoya], Nagoya University, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research [Oslo] (CICERO), University of Oslo (UiO), Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science [Zürich] (IAC), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), HYGEOS (SARL), Research Institute for Applied Mechanics [Fukuoka] (RIAM), Kyushu University [Fukuoka], This research has been supported by the Research Council of Norway (EVA (grant no. 229771), INES (grantno. 270061), and KeyClim (grant no. 295046)) and the Horizon 2020 project CRESCENDO (grant no. 641816). High performance computing and storage resources were provided bythe Norwegian Infrastructure for Computational Science (throughprojects NN2345K, NN9560K, NS2345K, and NS9560K). Pleasealso note further funding sources in the Acknowledgements, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Kyushu University, and Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)
- Subjects
MIXING-STATE ,Atmospheric Science ,Angstrom exponent ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,SEA-SALT AEROSOL ,DUST ,Forcing (mathematics) ,Atmospheric sciences ,114 Physical sciences ,01 natural sciences ,lcsh:Chemistry ,Atmosphere ,03 medical and health sciences ,SIZE DISTRIBUTION ,Radiative transfer ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,1172 Environmental sciences ,Optical depth ,030304 developmental biology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,0303 health sciences ,VERTICAL PROFILES ,Single-scattering albedo ,LIGHT-ABSORPTION ,lcsh:QC1-999 ,AERONET ,Aerosol ,MODEL ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,13. Climate action ,DEPTH ,GLOBAL ATMOSPHERE ,Environmental science ,REFRACTIVE-INDEX ,lcsh:Physics - Abstract
Within the framework of the AeroCom (Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models) initiative, the state-of-the-art modelling of aerosol optical properties is assessed from 14 global models participating in the phase III control experiment (AP3). The models are similar to CMIP6/AerChemMIP Earth System Models (ESMs) and provide a robust multi-model ensemble. Inter-model spread of aerosol species lifetimes and emissions appears to be similar to that of mass extinction coefficients (MECs), suggesting that aerosol optical depth (AOD) uncertainties are associated with a broad spectrum of parameterised aerosol processes. Total AOD is approximately the same as in AeroCom phase I (AP1) simulations. However, we find a 50 % decrease in the optical depth (OD) of black carbon (BC), attributable to a combination of decreased emissions and lifetimes. Relative contributions from sea salt (SS) and dust (DU) have shifted from being approximately equal in AP1 to SS contributing about 2∕3 of the natural AOD in AP3. This shift is linked with a decrease in DU mass burden, a lower DU MEC, and a slight decrease in DU lifetime, suggesting coarser DU particle sizes in AP3 compared to AP1. Relative to observations, the AP3 ensemble median and most of the participating models underestimate all aerosol optical properties investigated, that is, total AOD as well as fine and coarse AOD (AODf, AODc), Ångström exponent (AE), dry surface scattering (SCdry), and absorption (ACdry) coefficients. Compared to AERONET, the models underestimate total AOD by ca. 21 % ± 20 % (as inferred from the ensemble median and interquartile range). Against satellite data, the ensemble AOD biases range from −37 % (MODIS-Terra) to −16 % (MERGED-FMI, a multi-satellite AOD product), which we explain by differences between individual satellites and AERONET measurements themselves. Correlation coefficients (R) between model and observation AOD records are generally high (R>0.75), suggesting that the models are capable of capturing spatio-temporal variations in AOD. We find a much larger underestimate in coarse AODc (∼ −45 % ± 25 %) than in fine AODf (∼ −15 % ± 25 %) with slightly increased inter-model spread compared to total AOD. These results indicate problems in the modelling of DU and SS. The AODc bias is likely due to missing DU over continental land masses (particularly over the United States, SE Asia, and S. America), while marine AERONET sites and the AATSR SU satellite data suggest more moderate oceanic biases in AODc. Column AEs are underestimated by about 10 % ± 16 %. For situations in which measurements show AE > 2, models underestimate AERONET AE by ca. 35 %. In contrast, all models (but one) exhibit large overestimates in AE when coarse aerosol dominates (bias ca. +140 % if observed AE < 0.5). Simulated AE does not span the observed AE variability. These results indicate that models overestimate particle size (or underestimate the fine-mode fraction) for fine-dominated aerosol and underestimate size (or overestimate the fine-mode fraction) for coarse-dominated aerosol. This must have implications for lifetime, water uptake, scattering enhancement, and the aerosol radiative effect, which we can not quantify at this moment. Comparison against Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) in situ data results in mean bias and inter-model variations of −35 % ± 25 % and −20 % ± 18 % for SCdry and ACdry, respectively. The larger underestimate of SCdry than ACdry suggests the models will simulate an aerosol single scattering albedo that is too low. The larger underestimate of SCdry than ambient air AOD is consistent with recent findings that models overestimate scattering enhancement due to hygroscopic growth. The broadly consistent negative bias in AOD and surface scattering suggests an underestimate of aerosol radiative effects in current global aerosol models. Considerable inter-model diversity in the simulated optical properties is often found in regions that are, unfortunately, not or only sparsely covered by ground-based observations. This includes, for instance, the Sahara, Amazonia, central Australia, and the South Pacific. This highlights the need for a better site coverage in the observations, which would enable us to better assess the models, but also the performance of satellite products in these regions. Using fine-mode AOD as a proxy for present-day aerosol forcing estimates, our results suggest that models underestimate aerosol forcing by ca. −15 %, however, with a considerably large interquartile range, suggesting a spread between −35 % and +10 %.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Contribution of the world’s main dust source regions to the global cycle of desert dust
- Author
-
Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Adriana Rocha-Lima, Vincenzo Obiso, Jessica S. Wan, Natalie M. Mahowald, Longlei Li, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Yue Huang, Peter R. Colarco, Jasper F. Kok, Mian Chin, Samuel Albani, Ron L. Miller, Akinori Ito, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Douglas S. Hamilton, Martina Klose, and Yves Balkanski
- Subjects
Atmosphere ,Biogeochemical cycle ,Deposition (aerosol physics) ,Asian Dust ,Extinction (astronomy) ,Energy balance ,Environmental science ,Flux ,Atmospheric sciences ,Aerosol - Abstract
Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, the relative contributions of the world's major source regions to the global dust cycle remain poorly constrained. This problem hinders accounting for the potentially large impact of regional differences in dust properties on clouds, the Earth's energy balance, and terrestrial and marine biogeochemical cycles. Here, we constrain the contribution of each of the world's main dust source regions to the global dust cycle. We use an analytical framework that integrates an ensemble of global aerosol model simulations with observationally informed constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth (DAOD). We obtain a dataset that constrains the relative contribution of nine major source regions to size-resolved dust emission, atmospheric loading, DAOD, concentration, and deposition flux. We find that the 22–29 Tg (1 standard error range) global loading of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm is partitioned as follows: North African source regions contribute ∼ 50 % (11–15 Tg), Asian source regions contribute ∼ 40 % (8–13 Tg), and North American and Southern Hemisphere regions contribute ∼ 10 % (1.8–3.2 Tg). These results suggest that current models on average overestimate the contribution of North African sources to atmospheric dust loading at ∼ 65 %, while underestimating the contribution of Asian dust at ∼ 30 %. Our results further show that each source region's dust loading peaks in local spring and summer, which is partially driven by increased dust lifetime in those seasons. We also quantify the dust deposition flux to the Amazon rainforest to be ∼ 10 Tg yr−1, which is a factor of 2–3 less than inferred from satellite data by previous work that likely overestimated dust deposition by underestimating the dust mass extinction efficiency. The data obtained in this paper can be used to obtain improved constraints on dust impacts on clouds, climate, biogeochemical cycles, and other parts of the Earth system.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Supplementary material to 'Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance'
- Author
-
Jasper F. Kok, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R. Colarco, Douglas Stephen Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito, Martina Klose, Danny M. Leung, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Ron L. Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Adriana Rocha-Lima, Jessica S. Wan, and Chloe A. Whicker
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Supplementary material to 'Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO-ESMs: Mineral Dust'
- Author
-
Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Yves Balkanski, Samuel Albani, Tommi Bergman, Ken Carslaw, Anne Cozic, Chris Dearden, Beatrice Marticorena, Martine Michou, Twan van Noije, Pierre Nabat, Fionna O'Connor, Dirk Olivié, Joseph M. Prospero, Philippe Le Sager, Michael Schulz, and Catherine Scott
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO-ESMs: Mineral Dust
- Author
-
Tommi Bergman, Anne Cozic, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Yves Balkanski, Christopher Dearden, Michael Schulz, Joseph M. Prospero, Philippe Le Sager, Martine Michou, Kenneth S. Carslaw, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Twan van Noije, Béatrice Marticorena, F. M. O'Connor, Catherine E. Scott, Samuel Albani, and Pierre Nabat
- Subjects
Deposition (aerosol physics) ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Particle-size distribution ,Range (statistics) ,Radiative transfer ,Environmental science ,Particle ,Satellite ,Mineral dust ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Aerosol - Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the mineral dust aerosol modelled by five Earth System Models (ESM) within the Coordinated Research in Earth Systems and Climate: Experiments, kNowledge, Dissemination and Outreach (CRESCENDO) project. We quantify the global dust cycle described by each model in terms of global emissions together with dry and wet depositions, reporting large differences in ratio of dry over wet deposition across the models not directly correlated with the range of particle sizes emitted. The multi-model mean dust emissions was 2954 Tg yr−1 but with a large uncertainty due mainly to the difference in maximum dust particle size emitted. For the subset of ESMs without particles larger than 10 μm we obtained 1664 (σ = 650) Tg yr−1. Total dust emissions with identical nudged winds from reanalysis give us better consistency between models with 1530 (σ = 282) Tg yr−1. Significant discrepancies in the globally averaged dust mass extinction efficiency explain why even models with relatively similar dust load global budgets can display strong differences in dust optical depths. The comparison against observations has been done in terms of dust optical depths based on MODIS satellite products, showing a global consistency in terms of preferential dust sources and transport across the Atlantic. However, we found regional and seasonal differences between models and observations when we quantified the cross-correlation of time-series over dust emitting regions. To faithfully compare local emissions between models we introduce a re-gridded normalization method, that also can be compared with satellite products derived from dust events frequencies. Dust total depositions are compared with instrumental network to assess global and regional differences. We found that models agree with observations distant from dust sources within a factor 10, but the approximations of dust particle size distribution at emission contributed to a misrepresentation of the actual range of deposition values when instruments are close to dust emitting regions. The observational dust surface concentrations also are reproduced within a factor 10. The comparison of total aerosol optical depths with AERONETv3 stations where dust is dominant shows large differences between models, however with an increase of the inter-model consistency when the simulations are conducted with nudged-winds. The increase of the model ensemble consistency also means a better agreement with observations, which we have ascertained for dust total deposition, surface concentrations and optical depths (against both AERONETv3 and MODIS-DOD retrievals). We estimated the direct radiative effects of a multi-modal representation of the dust particle size distribution that includes the largest particles measured at FENNEC experiment. We introduced a method to ascertain the contributions per mode consistent with the multimodal direct radiative effects.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapor changes in CMIP6 models from 1850-2100
- Author
-
James Keeble, Birgit Hassler, Antara Banerjee, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Gabriel Chiodo, Sean Davis, Veronika Eyring, Paul T. Griffiths, Olaf Morgenstern, Peer Nowack, Guang Zeng, Jiankai Zhang, Greg Bodeker, David Cugnet, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Makoto Deushi, Larry W. Horowitz, Lijuan Li, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Pierre Nabat, Sungsu Park, Tongwen Wu, University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM), DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt [Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling] (DLR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado [Boulder]-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), University of Leicester, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research [Lauder] (NIWA), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research [Wellington] (NIWA), MOE Key Laboratory of Semi-Arid Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Bodeker Scientific, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), National Center for Atmospheric Research [Boulder] (NCAR), Meteorological Research Institute [Tsukuba] (MRI), Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning, Stanford University, China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), and Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph] ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,13. Climate action ,[SDU.STU.CL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Climatology ,[SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences ,010501 environmental sciences ,15. Life on land ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Stratospheric ozone and water vapour are key components of the Earth system, and past and future changes to both have important impacts on global and regional climate. Here we evaluate long-term changes in these species from the pre- industrial (1850) to the end of the 21st century in CMIP6 models under a range of future emissions scenarios. There is good agreement between the CMIP multi-model mean and observations, although there is substantial variation between the individual CMIP6 models. For the CMIP6 multi-model mean, global total column ozone (TCO) has increased from ∼300 DU in 1850 to ∼305 DU in 1960, before rapidly declining in the 1970s and 1980s following the use and emission of halogenated ozone depleting substances (ODSs). TCO is projected to return to 1960s values by the middle of the 21st century under the SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP4-3.4, SSP4-6.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, and under the SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios TCO values are projected to be ∼10 DU higher than the 1960s values by 2100. However, under the SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-1.6 scenarios, TCO is not projected to return to the 1960s values despite reductions in halogenated ODSs due to decreases in tropospheric ozone mixing ratios. This global pattern is similar to regional patterns, except in the tropics where TCO under most scenarios is not projected to return to 1960s values, either through reductions in tropospheric ozone under SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, or through reductions in lower stratospheric ozone resulting from an acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation under other SSPs. CMIP6 multi-model mean stratospheric water vapour mixing ratios in the tropical lower stratosphere have increased by ∼0.5 ppmv from the pre-industrial to the present day and are projected to increase further by the end of the 21st century. The largest increases (∼2 ppmv) are simulated under the future scenarios with the highest assumed forcing pathway (e.g. SSP5-8.5). Both TCO and tropical lower stratospheric water vapour show large variability following explosive volcanic eruptions.
- Published
- 2020
33. How well do the latest Earth System Models capture the behaviour of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in the atmosphere?
- Author
-
Michael Schulz, M. Yoshioka, Fiona M. O'Connor, Declan O'Donnell, Twan van Noije, Jane Mulcahy, Philippe Le Sager, Mohit Dalvi, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Kenneth S. Carslaw, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Catherine E. Scott, Yves Balkanski, Lars Nieradzik, Dominick V. Spracklen, Tommi Bergman, Gerd A. Folberth, Martine Michou, Christopher Dearden, and Pierre Nabat
- Subjects
Atmosphere ,Earth system science ,Environmental science ,Atmospheric sciences ,Aerosol - Abstract
Biogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is formed as a result of the atmospheric oxidation of gas-phase biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs). Here, we evaluate the ability of five European Earth System Models (CNRM-ESM2-1, EC-Earth3, IPSL-CM6, NorESM1.2, UKESM1) to capture the amount, and behaviour, of biogenic SOA in the atmosphere.The ESMs cover a range of complexity in terms of their representation of the sources and processing of biogenic SOA (i.e., from a fixed climatology of SOA amount to an interactive BVOC emission scheme followed by atmospheric processing).We combine station measurements of BVOC emission and atmospheric BVOC concentrations with remotely sensed isoprene emission estimates to evaluate the models’ representation of the sources of biogenic SOA. We use organic aerosol mass and particle number concentration measurements from a number of forested sites to evaluate the ability of the models to capture the seasonal cycle in the amount of biogenic SOA present, as well as its impact on the aerosol size distribution. Whilst the models appear to capture the seasonal cycle in organic aerosol well for a boreal forest site, the ESMs consistently over-predict the amount of organic aerosol present at a tropical forest location. Finally, we explore the ability of these models to capture the observed relationships between organic aerosol mass, or particle number, and temperature. We find that the ESMs equipped with vegetation models that generate BVOC emissions interactively are able to capture well the strength of the observed relationship between temperature and organic aerosol mass. This lends confidence to the ability of these ESMs to accurately represent changes in atmospheric composition driven by climate.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Properties and challenges of mineral dust aerosol modelling in the latest Earth System Models
- Author
-
Declan O'Donnell, Catherine E. Scott, Tommi Bergman, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Yves Balkanski, Lars Nieradzik, Martine Michou, Fiona M. O'Connor, Twan van Noije, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Michael Schulz, Béatrice Marticorena, Mohit Dalvi, Kenneth S. Carslaw, and Pierre Nabat
- Subjects
Earth system science ,Environmental science ,Mineral dust ,Atmospheric sciences ,Aerosol - Abstract
Mineral dust aerosols participate in the climate system and biogeochemistry processes due to its interactions with key components of Earth Systems: radiation, clouds, soil and chemical components. A central element to improve our understanding of mineral dust is through its modeling with Earth Systems Models where all these interactions are included. However, current simulations of dust variability exhibit important uncertainties and biases, which are model-dependent, whose cause is our imperfect knowledge about how to best represent the dust life cycle. For these reasons a continuous evaluation of the performance and properties of the different models compared against measurements is a crucial step to improve our knowledge of the dust cycle and its role in the climate system and biogeochemical cycles. Here we present an exhaustive evaluation of mineral dust aerosols in CRESCEND-ESMs over global, regional and local scales. We compare models against three networks of instruments for total dust deposition flux, yearly surface concentrations, and optical depths. Global and regional dust optical depths are compared with MODIS and MISR derived products. Specific analyses are done over the Sahel region where improved and compressive dust observational datasets are available. The results indicate that all the models capture the general properties of the global dust cycle, although the role of larger particles remains challenging. Differences are partially due to surface winds as nudged simulations improve the inter-model comparison and the performance in optical depth compared to MODIS. At the regional scale, there is an optical depth reasonable agreement over main source areas, but a joint inter-comparison including fluxes and concentration indicates larger differences. At the local scale, the uncertainties increase and current models are not able to reproduce together several observables at the same time.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Re-assessment of pre-industrial fires in CMIP6 models and the implications for radiative forcing
- Author
-
Kenneth S. Carslaw, Lars Nieradzik, Mohit Dalvi, Jane Mulcahy, Pierre Nabat, Gerd A. Folberth, Fiona M. O'Connor, Cat Scott, Michael Schulz, Tommi Bergman, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, M. Yoshioka, Martine Michou, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Douglas S. Hamilton, Yves Balkanski, and Twan van Noije
- Subjects
Environmental science ,Radiative forcing ,Atmospheric sciences - Abstract
Assessment of anthropogenic radiative forcing requires a robust understanding of the composition of the pre-industrial baseline atmosphere from which calculations are madeIt is often assumed that fire activity and the associated aerosol emissions were lower in the pre-industrial period than in the present day. However, some lines of evidence suggest that fire activity may have halved since the pre-industrial period. Here we compare the simulated ratio of pre-industrial (c.1750CE and c.1850CE) to present-day black carbon surface concentrations in five ESMs (CNRM-ESM2-1, EC-Earth3, IPSL-CM6, NorESM1.2, UKESM1), using historical fire emissions from the Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), to the ratio in Northern Hemisphere ice-core records. We find that when forced with CMIP6 fire emissions all ESMs overestimate the present-day to pre-industrial black carbon ratio. This is consistent with previous studies and suggests that the contribution of fire to the composition of the pre-industrial atmosphere may be too low. If the contrast between the pre-industrial and present-day atmospheres in these models is too great, they are likely to overestimate the strength of the anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing. We extend our analysis to include additional ESMs providing historical simulations for CMIP6, as included in the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Supplementary material to 'Multi-model evaluation of aerosol optical properties in the AeroCom phase III Control experiment, using ground and space based columnar observations from AERONET, MODIS, AATSR and a merged satellite product as well as surface in-situ observations from GAW sites'
- Author
-
Jonas Gliß, Augustin Mortier, Michael Schulz, Elisabeth Andrews, Yves Balkanski, Susanne E. Bauer, Anna M. K. Benedictow, Huisheng Bian, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Paul Ginoux, Jan J. Griesfeller, Andreas Heckel, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Harri Kokkola, Paolo Laj, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Hitoshi Matsui, Gunnar Myhre, David Neubauer, Twan van Noije, Peter North, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Larisa Sogacheva, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Svetlana G. Tsyro
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Multi-model evaluation of aerosol optical properties in the AeroCom phase III Control experiment, using ground and space based columnar observations from AERONET, MODIS, AATSR and a merged satellite product as well as surface in-situ observations from GAW sites
- Author
-
Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Larisa Sogacheva, Michael Schulz, Dirk Jan Leo Oliviè, Susanne E. Bauer, Alf Kirkevåg, Jan Griesfeller, Paolo Laj, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Jonas Gliß, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Peter North, Toshihiko Takemura, Elisabeth Andrews, A. Heckel, Mian Chin, Kostas Tsigaridis, Augustin Mortier, Philippe Le Sager, Huisheng Bian, Svetlana Tsyro, Anna Benedictow, Zak Kipling, Paul Ginoux, Harri Kokkola, Yves Balkanski, David Neubauer, Gunnar Myhre, and Twan van Noije
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Scattering ,Radiative transfer ,Environmental science ,Satellite ,Relative humidity ,AATSR ,Absorption (electromagnetic radiation) ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Aerosol ,AERONET - Abstract
Within the framework of the AeroCom (Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models) initiative, the present day modelling of aerosol optical properties has been assessed using simulated data representative for the year 2010, from 14 global aerosol models participating in the Phase III Control experiment. The model versions are close or equal to those used for CMIP6 and AerChemMIP and inform also on bias in state of the art ESMs. Modelled column optical depths (total, fine and coarse mode AOD) and Angstrom Exponents (AE) were compared both with ground based observations from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET, version 3) as well as space based observations from AATSR-SU instruments. In addition, the modelled AODs were compared with MODIS (Aqua and Terra) data and a satellite AOD data-set (MERGED-FMI) merged from 12 different individual AOD products. Furthermore, for the first time, the modelled near surface scattering (under dry conditions) and absorption coefficients were evaluated against measurements made at low relative humidity at surface in-situ GAW sites. Statistics are based mainly on normalised mean biases and Pearson correlation coefficients from colocated model and observation data in monthly resolution. Hence, the results are mostly representative for the regions covered by each of the observation networks. Model biases established against satellite data yield insights into remote continental areas and oceans, where ground-based networks lack site coverage. The satellite data themselves are evaluated against AERONET observations, to test our aggregation and re-gridding routines, suggesting relative AOD biases of −5 %, −6 %, +9 % and +18 % for AATSR-SU, MERGED-FMI, MODIS-aqua and MODIS-terra, respectively, with high correlations exceeding 0.8. Biases of fine and coarse AOD and AE in AATSR are found to be +2 %, −16 % and +14.7 % respectively, at AERONET sites, with correlations of the order of 0.8. The AeroCom MEDIAN and most of the participating models underestimate the optical properties investigated, relative to remote sensing observations. AERONET AOD is underestimated by 21 % ± 17 %. Against satellite data, the model AOD biases range from −38 % (MODIS-terra) to −17 % (MERGED-FMI). Correlation coefficients of model AODs with AERONET, MERGED-FMI and AATSR-SU are high (0.8–0.9) and slightly lower against the two MODIS data-sets (0.6–0.8). Investigation of fine and coarse AODs from the MEDIAN model reveals biases of −10% ± 20 % and −41 % ± 29 % against AERONET and −13 % and −24 % against AATSR-SU, respectively. The differences in bias against AERONET and AATSR-SU are in agreement with the established satellite bias against AERONET. These results indicate that most of the AOD bias is due to missing coarse AOD in the regions covered by these observations. Underestimates are also found when comparing the models against the surface GAW observations, showing AeroCom MEDIAN mean bias and inter-model variation of −44 % ± 22 % and −32 % ± 34 % for scattering and absorption coefficients, respectively. Dry scattering shows higher underestimation than AOD at ambient relative humidity and is in agreement with recent findings that suggest that models tend to overestimate scattering enhancement due to hygroscopic growth. Broadly consistent negative bias in AOD and scattering suggest a general underestimate in aerosol effects in current global aerosol models. The large diversity in the surface absorption results suggests differences in the model treatment of light absorption by black carbon (BC), dust (DU) and to a minor degree, organic aerosol (OA). Considerable diversity is found among the models in the simulated near surface absorption coefficients, particularly in regions associated with dust (e.g. Sahara, Tibet), biomass burning (e.g. Amazonia, Central Australia) and biogenic emissions (e.g. Amazonia). Regions associated with high anthropogenic BC emissions such as China and India exhibit comparatively good agreement for all models. Evaluation of modelled column AEs shows an underestimation of 9 % ± 24 % against AERONET and −21 % against AATSR-SU. This suggests that overall, models tend to overestimate particle size, with implications for lifetime and radiative transfer calculations. An investigation of modelled emissions, burdens and lifetimes, mass-specific-extinction coefficients (MECs) and optical depths (ODs) for each species and model reveals considerable diversity in most of these parameters. These are discussed in detail for each model individually. Inter-model spread of aerosol species lifetime appears to be similar to that of mass extinction coefficients, suggesting that AOD uncertainties are still associated to a broad spectrum of parameterised aerosol processes.
- Published
- 2020
38. Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models
- Author
-
Gillian Thornhill, William Collins, Dirk Olivié, Alex Archibald, Susanne Bauer, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Stephanie Fiedler, Gerd Folberth, Ada Gjermundsen, Larry Horowitz, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Martine Michou, Jane Mulcahy, Pierre Nabat, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Fabien Paulot, Michael Schulz, Catherine E. Scott, Roland Seferian, Chris Smith, Toshihiko Takemura, Simone Tilmes, and James Weber
- Abstract
Feedbacks play a fundamental role in determining the magnitude of the response of the climate system to external forcing, such as from anthropogenic emissions. The latest generation of Earth system models include aerosol and chemistry components that interact with each other and with the biosphere. These interactions introduce a complex web of feedbacks which it is important to understand and quantify. This paper addresses the multiple pathways for aerosol and chemical feedbacks in Earth system models. This is achieved by extending previous formalisms which include CO2 concentrations as a state variable to a formalism which in principle includes the concentrations of all climate-active atmospheric constituents. This framework is demonstrated by applying it to the Earth system models participating in CMIP6 with a focus on the non-CO2 reactive gases and aerosols (methane, ozone, sulphate aerosol, organic aerosol and dust). We find that the overall climate feedback through chemistry and aerosols is negative in the CMIP6 Earth system models due to increased negative forcing from aerosols with warmer temperatures. Through diagnosing changes in methane emissions and lifetime we find that if Earth system models were to allow methane to vary interactively, methane positive feedbacks (principally wetland methane emissions and biogenic VOC emissions) would offset much of the aerosol feedbacks.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Supplementary material to 'Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models'
- Author
-
Gillian Thornhill, William Collins, Dirk Olivié, Alex Archibald, Susanne Bauer, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Stephanie Fiedler, Gerd Folberth, Ada Gjermundsen, Larry Horowitz, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Martine Michou, Jane Mulcahy, Pierre Nabat, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Fabien Paulot, Michael Schulz, Catherine E. Scott, Roland Seferian, Chris Smith, Toshihiko Takemura, Simone Tilmes, and James Weber
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment
- Author
-
D. Kemper, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, André Butz, T. Knigge, T. von Clarmann, Johannes Orphal, O. Sqalli-Houssini, Dennis Weise, Otto Hasekamp, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Jochen Landgraf, Heinrich Bovensmann, Institut für Umweltphysik [Heidelberg], Universität Heidelberg [Heidelberg], Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Environmental Physics [Bremen] (IUP), University of Bremen, SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON), Stress Environnementaux et BIOsurveillance des milieux aquatiques (SEBIO), Université Le Havre Normandie (ULH), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)-SFR Condorcet, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)-Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)-Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), and Airbus Defence and Space [Deutschland]
- Subjects
[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph] ,Atmospheric Science ,Meteorology ,Spectrometer ,lcsh:TA715-787 ,lcsh:Earthwork. Foundations ,Diffuse sky radiation ,Albedo ,7. Clean energy ,lcsh:Environmental engineering ,Atmosphere ,Depth sounding ,Earth sciences ,13. Climate action ,Greenhouse gas ,Geostationary orbit ,ddc:550 ,Environmental science ,Cirrus ,lcsh:TA170-171 ,[SDU.OTHER]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Other ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Remote sensing - Abstract
The Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E) is a concept for a geostationary satellite sounder that aims to constrain the sources and sinks of greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) for continental-scale regions. Its primary focus is on central Europe. G3E carries a spectrometer system that collects sunlight backscattered from the Earth's surface and atmosphere in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave-infrared (SWIR) spectral range. Solar absorption spectra allow for spatiotemporally dense observations of the column-average concentrations of carbon dioxide (XCO2), methane (XCH4), and carbon monoxide (XCO). The mission concept in particular facilitates sampling of the diurnal variation with several measurements per day during summer. Here, we present the mission concept and carry out an initial performance assessment of the retrieval capabilities. The radiometric performance of the 4 grating spectrometers is tuned to reconcile small ground-pixel sizes (~2 km × 3 km at 50° latitude) with short single-shot exposures (~2.9 s) that allow for sampling continental regions such as central Europe within 2 h while providing a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. The noise errors to be expected for XCO2, XCH4, and XCO are assessed through retrieval simulations for a European trial ensemble. Generally, single-shot precision for the targeted XCO2 and XCH4 is better than 0.5 % with some exception for scenes with low infrared surface albedo observed under low sun conditions in winter. For XCO, precision is generally better than 10 %. Performance for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres is assessed by mimicking G3E's slant view on Europe for an ensemble of atmospheric scattering properties used previously for evaluating nadir-viewing low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites. While retrieval concepts developed for LEO configurations generally succeed in mitigating aerosol- and cirrus-induced retrieval errors for G3E's setup, residual errors are somewhat greater in geostationary orbit (GEO) than in LEO. G3E's deployment in the vicinity of the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) satellites has the potential to make synergistic use of MTG's sounding capabilities e.g. with respect to characterization of aerosol and cloud properties or with respect to enhancing carbon monoxide retrievals by combining G3E's solar and MTG's thermal infrared spectra.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Mapping spectroscopic uncertainties into prospective methane retrieval errors from Sentinel-5 and its precursor
- Author
-
Vincent Boudon, Jochen Landgraf, Ha Tran, Frank Hase, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, André Galli, Voltaire A. Velazco, André Butz, and Frans Alkemade
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Absorption spectroscopy ,530 Physics ,Perturbation (astronomy) ,7. Clean energy ,01 natural sciences ,Methane ,Spectral line ,010309 optics ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0103 physical sciences ,Spectral resolution ,lcsh:TA170-171 ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Remote sensing ,Spectrometer ,lcsh:TA715-787 ,520 Astronomy ,lcsh:Earthwork. Foundations ,lcsh:Environmental engineering ,Wavelength ,chemistry ,13. Climate action ,Satellite ,Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics - Abstract
Sentinel-5 (S5) and its precursor (S5P) are future European satellite missions aiming at global monitoring of methane (CH4) column-average dry air mole fractions (XCH4). The spectrometers to be deployed onboard the satellites record spectra of sunlight backscattered from the Earth's surface and atmosphere. In particular, they exploit CH4 absorption in the shortwave infrared spectral range around 1.65 μm (S5 only) and 2.35 μm (both S5 and S5P) wavelength. Given an accuracy goal of better than 2 % for XCH4 to be delivered on regional scales, assessment and reduction of potential sources of systematic error such as spectroscopic uncertainties is crucial. Here, we investigate how spectroscopic errors propagate into retrieval errors on the global scale. To this end, absorption spectra of a ground-based Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) operating at very high spectral resolution serve as estimate for the quality of the spectroscopic parameters. Feeding the FTS fitting residuals as a perturbation into a global ensemble of simulated S5- and S5P-like spectra at relatively low spectral resolution, XCH4 retrieval errors exceed 0.6 % in large parts of the world and show systematic correlations on regional scales, calling for improved spectroscopic parameters.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. First measurement of the small-scale spatial variability of the rain drop size distribution: Results from a crucial experiment and maximum entropy modeling
- Author
-
Ramiro Checa-Garcia
- Subjects
Physics - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ,Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph) ,FOS: Physical sciences - Abstract
The main challenges of measuring precipitation are related to the spatio-temporal variability of the drop-size distribution, to the uncertainties that condition the modeling of that distribution, and to the instrumental errors present in the in situ estimations. This PhD dissertation proposes advances in all these questions. The relevance of the spatial variability of the drop-size distribution for remote sensing measurements and hydro-meteorology field studies is asserted by analyzing the measurement of a set of disdrometers deployed on a network of 5 squared kilometers. This study comprises the spatial variability of integral rainfall parameters, the ZR relationships, and the variations within the one moment scaling method. The modeling of the drop-size distribution is analyzed by applying the MaxEnt method and comparing it with the methods of moments and the maximum likelihood. The instrumental errors are analyzed with a compressive comparison of sampling and binning uncertainties that affect actual devices. These analysis are further extended in several appendices where an error analysis is developed and new studies are proposed. The relevance of the pre-processing of disdrometric measurements is also assessed. The data-sets evaluated comprise experimental measurements of the GPM (NASA-JAXA) ground validation satellite mission and synthetic distributions generated computationally., PhD Thesis Dissertation. Main results are in English (Chapters 8, 9, 10; appendix A, C). The introduction, the description of the empirical information and pre-processing are in Spanish. A version with the figures at full-resolution may be download at: http://blog.ramiro-checa.info/pages/Research
- Published
- 2013
43. The Climate relevant processing of mineral dust by volatile organic compounds : (CLIMDO) project
- Author
-
Antonia Zogka, Frederic Thevenet, Mathieu Cazaunau, Jean-François Doussin, Michael R. Giordano, Paola Formenti, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Aline Gratien, Claudia Di Biagio, Yves Balkanski, Francesco Battaglia, Emmanouil Romanias, Servanne Chevaillier, Vincent Michoud, Antonin Bergé, Didier Hauglustaine, Edouard Pangui, Vincent Gaudion, Cécile Mirande-Bret, Anne Cozic, Centre for Energy and Environment (CERI EE), Ecole nationale supérieure Mines-Télécom Lille Douai (IMT Lille Douai), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT), and Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)
- Subjects
13. Climate action ,Environmental chemistry ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Mineral dust ,7. Clean energy ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS - Abstract
As emphasized by the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), aerosols contribute the largest uncertainty to global radiative forcing budget estimates. The uncertainty stems largely from the lack of information related to global aerosol distributions, composition, and aging effects in the atmosphere, all of which affect aerosol radiative properties.Of the two major categories of aerosols, natural and anthropogenic, natural aerosols remain the largest source of the uncertainty. This limits our capacity to measure and attribute total climate forcings. Without a firm understanding of total climate forcing, our ability to predict its evolution over time diminishes and limits the development of adaptation strategies for future climate change.Aerosolized mineral dust is the largest single component of the global aerosol mass budget, making up nearly half of annual particle emissions to the atmosphere. Mineral dust aerosols influence the global climate through both direct interactions with radiation (scattering and absorption in the visible and IR regions) as well as indirect interactions with radiation (by serving as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice nuclei (IN)). One potentially important aspect of dust aerosols is that they are able to uptake and heterogeneously react with gases. Henceforth, mineral dust may also play a significant but mostly unknown role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation in the atmosphere.While the combination of the complex reaction pathways and processing mechanisms inherent to the dust/organic system is hampering our understanding of dust and organic aerosols on global climate, and despite a great number of progresses on climate-relevant properties of mineral dust and SOA in these past ten years, studies of the heterogeneous chemistry occurring between dust and organic species are sparse.The CLImate relevant processing of Mineral Dust by volatile Organic compounds (CLIMDO) project tackles this under-explored science question by proposing the first comprehensive process-driven project addressing the reactivity of complex and realistic mineral dust/organic systems to better understand how dust and VOCs influence the global climate system.CLIMDO will investigate the heterogeneous interaction of mineral dust with two of the most common organic SOA precursors: glyoxal and methylglyoxal from ubiquitous anthropogenic and biogenic sources, thought combination of innovative laboratory experiments in a well-controlled and characterized environment (the atmospheric simulation chamber CESAM) and advanced flow reactors and optical cells), the development of novel modelling schemes of both the reaction mechanisms and the resulting optical properties of mineral dust, and new simulations of the global direct radiative effect and SOA distribution using the LMDzOR-INCA.This presentation describes the strategy and workplan of the CLIMDO project, including dissemination of results and open data, to inform the science community and foster and cluster new collaborations.
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.