Search

To investigate the utility of a novel serum miRNA biomarker panel to distinguish teratoma from nonmalignant necrotic/fibrotic tissues or nonviable tumours in patients with NSGCT undergoing post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery.We prospectively collected pre-surgical serum samples from 22 consecutive testicular NSGCT patients with residual NSGCT after chemotherapy undergoing post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery. We measured serum miRNA expression of four microRNAs (miRNA-375, miRNA-200a-3p, miRNA-200a-5p and miRNA-200b-3p) and compared with pathologic findings at time of surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to assess the ability of these miRNA to differentiate between teratoma and necrosis or viable malignancy.Twenty-two patients with NSGCT were split into two groups based on pathology at time of post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery (teratoma group vs. necrosis/fibrosis/viable tumour group, i.e., NFVT). Patients with teratoma were older at diagnosis compared with those patients with NFVT (median age 28.7 vs. 23.9). Patients with NFVT were more likely to have embryonal carcinoma in their primary tumour (81.8% vs. 27.3%;This novel miRNA panel (miRNA-375, miRNA-200a-3p, miRNA-200a-5p and miRNA-200b-3p) did not distinguish teratoma from nonmalignant necrotic/fibrotic tissues or nonviable tumours in patients with NSGCT undergoing post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery.

ImportanceAppendiceal Adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor and given the inherent difficulties in performing prospective trials in such a rare disease currently there is a scant amount of high-quality data upon which to guide treatment decisions, which highlights the unmet need for more pre-clinical and clinical investigation for this orphan diseaseObjectiveTo objectively evaluate the effectiveness of flouropyrimdine-based systemic chemotherapy in inoperable low-grade mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma patients.DesignThis open label randomized crossover trial recruited patients from September 2013 to January 2021. The data collection cutoff was May 2022.SettingSingle tertiary care comprehensive cancer center.ParticipantsEnrollment of up to 30 patients was planned. Eligible patients had histological evidence of a metastatic low grade, mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma, with radiographic images demonstrating the presence of mucinous peritoneal carcinomatosis and were not considered a candidate for complete cytoreductive surgery. Key exclusion criteria were concurrent or recent investigational therapy, evidence of a bowel obstruction, use of total parental nutrition.InterventionsPatients were randomized to either 6 months observation followed by 6 months of chemotherapy, or initial chemotherapy followed by observation. The majority of patients were treated with either 5FU or capecitabine as single agent (n = 15, 63%); 3 (13%) received doublet chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI), bevacizumab was added to cytotoxic chemotherapy for 5 (21%) patients.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe difference in tumor growth and patients reported outcomes between the chemotherapy and observation periods. Also, the objective response rate, the rate of bowel complications, and differences in overall survival.ResultsA total of 24 patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients were available to evaluate difference in tumor growth between treatment and observation; there was not a significant difference (8.4% (1.5, 15.3%) increase from baseline on treatment vs. 4.0% (−0.1, 8.0%) increase from baseline on observation; p=0.26). Of the 18 patients who received any chemotherapy, zero had an objective response (14 (77.8%) SD, 4 (22.2 %) PD). Median OS was 53.2 months, there was no significant difference in OS between the Observation First arm (76 months) and the Treatment First arm (53 months) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.16 to 2.6; p = 0.48). Patient reported quality of life metrics identified that fatigue (Mean scores were 18.5 vs 28.9, p=0.02), peripheral neuropathy (6.7 vs 28.9, p=0.014), and financial difficulty (8.9 vs 28.9, p=0.0013) were all significantly worse while on treatment.Conclusions and RelevanceThese data suggest that patients with low-grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma do not derive benefit from systemic fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT01946854.URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01946854KEY POINTSQuestionIs fluoropyrimidine-based systemic chemotherapy effective in treating inoperable low-grade mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma patients?FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial that included 24 patients, there was no significant difference in tumor growth between treatment and observation (8.4% increase from baseline on treatment vs. 4.0% increase from baseline on observation; p=0.26).MeaningPatients with low-grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma do not derive benefit from systemic fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.