Search

The objective of this study is to describe and analyze adverse drug events (ADE) identified using the Global trigger tool (GTT) in a Finnish tertiary hospital during a 5-year period and also to evaluate whether the medication module of the GTT is a useful tool for ADE detection and management or if modification of the medication module is needed. A cross-sectional study of retrospective record review in a 450-bed tertiary hospital in Finland. Ten randomly selected patients from electronic medical records were reviewed bimonthly from 2017 to 2021. The GTT team reviewed a total of 834 records with modified GTT method, which includes the evaluation of possible polypharmacy, National Early Warning Score (NEWS), highest nursing intensity raw score (NI), and pain triggers. The data set contained 366 records with triggers in medication module and 601 records with the polypharmacy trigger that were analyzed in this study. With the GTT, a total of 53 ADEs were detected in the 834 medical records, which corresponds to 13 ADEs/1000 patient-days and 6% of the patients. Altogether, 44% of the patients had at least one trigger found with the GTT medication module. As the number of medication module triggers increased per patient, it was more likely that the patient had also experienced an ADE. The number of triggers found with the GTT medication module in patients’ records seems to correlate with the risk of ADEs. Modification of the GTT could provide even more reliable data for ADE prevention.

Background Fluid therapy is a common intervention in critically ill patients. Fluid therapy errors may cause harm to patients. Thus, understanding of reported fluid therapy incidents is required in order to learn from them and develop protective measures, including utilizing expertise of pharmacists and technology to improve patient safety at the national level. Objectives To describe fluid therapy incidents voluntarily reported in intensive care and high dependency units (ICUs) to a national incident reporting system, by investigating the error types, fluid products, consequences to patients and actions taken to alleviate them, and to identify at which phase of the medication process the incidents had occurred and had been detected. Methods Medication related voluntarily reported incident (n = 7623) reports were obtained from all ICUs in 2007–2017. Incidents concerning fluid therapy (n = 2201) were selected. The retrospective analysis utilized categorized data and narrative descriptions of the incidents. The results were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Results Most voluntarily reported incidents had occurred during the dispensing/preparing phase (n = 1306, 59%) of the medication process: a point of risk. Most incidents (n = 1975, 90%) had reached the patient and passed through many phases in the medication process and nursing shift change checks before detection. One third of the errors (n = 596, 30%) were reported to have caused consequences to patients. One quarter (n = 492, 25%) of the errors were reported to have required an additional procedure to alleviate or monitor the consequences. Conclusions Utilizing national incident report data enabled identifying systemic points of risk in the medication process and learning to improve patient safety. To prevent similar incidents, initial interventions should focus on the dispensing/preparing phase before implementing active medication identification procedures at each phase of the medication process and nursing shift changes. Strengthening clinical pharmacy services, utilizing technology, coordinated by IV Fluid Coordinators and Medication Safety Officers, could improve patient safety in the ICUs.

The aim of this study was to describe identified risk areas related to the medication administration process in acute care in order to develop a three-dimensional-game intervention. A secondary analysis was conducted using (1) observed medication administrations (n = 1058) and identified medication errors in 2012 (n = 235), (2) a systematic review including a meta-analysis of previous medication administration educational interventions (n = 14) from 2000 to 2015, (3) incident reports of medication administration errors (n = 1012) from 2013 to 2014, and (4) focus group interviews with RNs' (n = 20) views in 2015. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify risk areas, and the data were organized according to the following main themes: (1) factors related to patients (patient identification, patients' characteristics or symptoms, and patients' allergies and interactions); (2) factors related to medications (medication information, changes in medications, generic substitutes, new drugs, look-alike/sound-alike drugs, demanding drug treatments, medication preparation, and administration techniques); (3) factors related to staffing (workload, skills, interruptions and distractions, division of work, responsibility, attitudes, and guidelines); and (4) factors related to communication (flow of information, communication with the patients, and marking of medication information). Identified risk areas could be used to develop interventions with the aim of increasing the safety of medication administration and nurses' skills.

Aims and objectives To describe ways of preventing medication administration errors based on reporters' views expressed in medication administration incident reports. Background Medication administration errors are very common, and nurses play important roles in committing and in preventing such errors. Thus far, incident reporters’ perceptions of how to prevent medication administration errors have rarely been analysed. Design and Methods This is a qualitative, descriptive study using an inductive content analysis of the incident reports related to medication administration errors (n = 1012). These free-text descriptions include reporters’ views on preventing the reoccurrence of medication administration errors. The data were collected from two hospitals in Finland and pertain to incidents that were reported between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. Results Reporters’ views on preventing medication administration errors were divided into three main categories related to individuals (health professionals), teams and organisations. The following categories related to individuals in preventing medication administration errors were identified: (1) accuracy and preciseness; (2) verification; and (3) following the guidelines, responsibility and attitude towards work. The team categories were as follows: (1) distribution of work; (2) flow of information and cooperation; and (3) documenting and marking the drug information. The categories related to organisation were as follows: (1) work environment; (2) resources; (3) training; (4) guidelines; and (5) development of the work. Conclusions Health professionals should administer medication with a high moral awareness and an attempt to concentrate on the task. Nonetheless, the system should support health professionals by providing a reasonable work environment and encouraging collaboration among the providers to facilitate the safe administration of medication. Relevance to clinical practice Although there are numerous approaches to supporting medication safety, approaches that support the ability of individual health professionals to manage daily medications should be prioritised.

Aims The aim of this review was to identify methods for measuring Registered Nurses' medication administration skills and to describe these skills. Design A systematic literature review. Data sources The CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, PsycInfo and Medic databases were searched for articles from the period 2007-2018. Review methods Two researchers independently selected the articles and evaluated their quality using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute study quality assessment tools. The data were analysed using content analysis. Results A total of 727 studies were identified of which 22 studies were included in this review. A total of six different measurement methods were identified: questionnaire or survey, observation, knowledge test or exam, focus group interviews, chart reviews and voluntarily reported errors. Different methods provided different information on medication administration skills. Medication administration skills were classified under nine areas: (1) safe ordering, handling, storing and discarding of medications, (2) preparing of medications, (3) the administration of medications to patients, (4) documentation, (5) evaluation and assessment of medication-related issues, (6) drug calculation skills, (7) cooperation with other professionals and (8) with the patients and (9) reporting of medication information. The results demonstrated that there are many areas that need to be improved to increase medication safety. Conclusions Medication administration includes many different phases, as a result of which nurses need to have many various skills to cope with medication administration as required by their profession. This review shows that nurses' medication administration skills need to be developed, and special attention should be paid to the preparation and administration phases. It is important to regularly utilise different teaching strategies and verify nurses' medication competence. As each research method has different limitations, it is vital that further studies combine different methods to form a comprehensive picture of nurses' medication administration skills.

Aim The aims of this qualitative descriptive study were to 1) explore and define radiographers' competence in intravenous pharmacotherapy before and after a simulation-based education, 2) examine radiographer's perceptions of transfer of learning into clinical practice. Method Sixteen diagnostic radiographers in one hospitals' Clinical Radiology Unit were individually interviewed before a multidisciplinary simulation-based pharmacotherapy education intervention in 2012 and fourteen were re-interviewed after the intervention 6–7 months later. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Before education the participants reported uncertain competence in pain management during imaging procedures and acute situations. These weak competence areas identified were strengthened and self-confidence grew. The intervention improved the domains of pharmacotherapy-related patient safety; teamwork development and communication skills. In addition, the radiographers indicated that the iv. pharmacotherapy knowledge from simulation learning was transferred to routine work. Conclusion The results of this study suggest simulation-based education is suitable for radiographers' pharmacotherapy learning. Adequate pain measurement and management are essential during invasive procedures and these skills can be realistically learned in simulations and transferred to clinical practice.

Reconstituting antibiotics for clinical use requires static postures and repetitive motions which may contribute to the development of musculoskeletal symptoms. Exposure to drugs can cause allergic contact reactions, with antibiotics being the most common cause for occupational contact sensitization among health care workers. We evaluated ergonomics and skin and respiratory tract reactions associated with parenteral antibiotic reconstitution among nurses and ward pharmacists in a tertiary hospital in Kuopio, Finland. A total of 28 ward pharmacists and 296 nurses were sent a link to a questionnaire asking about musculoskeletal symptoms and skin and respiratory tract reactions associated with antibiotic reconstitution. All of the 28 pharmacists and 92 nurses (response rate 100 and 31 %, respectively) answered the questionnaire. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with antibiotic reconstitution were more commonly experienced by the pharmacists than by the nurses (68 vs. 5 %; p

The aim of this paper is to analyse how medication incidents are detected in different phases of the medication process. The study design is a retrospective register study. The material was collected from one university hospital's web-based incident reporting database in Finland. In 2010, 1617 incident reports were made, 671 of those were medication incidents and analysed in this study. Statistical methods were used to analyse the material. Results were reported using frequencies and percentages. Twenty-one percent of all medication incidents were detected during documenting or reading the documents. One-sixth of medication incidents were detected during medicating the patients, and approximately one-tenth were detected during verifying of the medicines. It is important to learn how to break the chain of medication errors as early as possible. Findings showed that for nurses, the ability to concentrate on documenting and medicating the patient is essential.

Nurses are generally responsible for administering medication to patients and are, therefore, able to monitor or report medication errors. However, nurses can sometimes be responsible for causing errors, so it is important that they understand the consequences of these mistakes and how to prevent them. This article reports the results of a study that analysed the views of nurses, pharmacists and physicians at a Finnish university hospital on the prevention of medication errors. The findings suggest errors can be prevented by improving work environments and allowing healthcare staff, particularly nurses, to concentrate on the task at hand when dealing with medicines.