Search

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the antimüllerian hormone (AMH) level determined using the Access AMH assay for predicting poor ovarian response (POR) defined as ≤4 oocytes retrieved, including the validation of the predefined AMH cutoff of 0.93 ng/mL in both serum and plasma., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Fifteen private and academic fertility centers (14 in the United States and 1 in Canada)., Patient(s): Women aged 21-45 years planning controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes retrieved, categorized as POR and normal-to-high ovarian response (non-POR). The correlation of AMH level and antral follicle count., Result(s): Data were available for 472 participants who completed the study (74 with POR and 398 non-POR). The mean AMH serum level among those with POR was 0.99 ng/mL (median 0.76 ng/mL) compared with 2.83 ng/mL (median 2.36 ng/mL) among the normal-to-high responders. For confirmation of the 0.93 ng/mL AMH level cutoff as a predictor of POR, a receiver operating characteristic analysis gave an area under the curve of 0.852, with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 63.5% and 89.2%, respectively. The associated positive predictive value was 52.2% and the negative predictive value was 92.9%. The AMH plasma values demonstrated a strong correlation with AMH serum values with an r value = 0.9980. The previously established AMH cutoff of 1.77 ng/mL for antral follicle count >15 resulted in a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77.7-88.5) and a specificity of 59.9% (95% CI 54.2-65.4)., Conclusion(s): This study validated the previously established AMH cut-point for the prediction of POR. Because this cut-point may vary depending on the assay used, the specific AMH assay should be reported in the literature whenever possible., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate a new fully automated antimüllerian hormone (AMH) assay for prediction of poor ovarian response (POR) to ovarian stimulation defined as four or fewer oocytes retrieved., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Thirteen private and academic fertility centers in the United States., Patients(s): A total of 178 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle eligible for the study were consented and enrolled, with data available from 160 women for prediction of POR and 164 women for AMH correlation with antral follicle count (AFC)., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Cutoff point for AMH that predicts POR. Correlation of AMH with AFC, and cutoff point for AMH that correlates with antral follicle count >15., Result(s): The mean AMH among the poor responders was 0.74 ng/mL, compared with 3.20 ng/mL for normal to high responders. The AMH cutoff at 90% specificity for predicting POR with the use of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.93 ng/mL, with an associated sensitivity of 74.1%. For prediction of POR, ROC analysis showed that AMH (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.929) was significantly better than FSH (AUC = 0.615; P<.0001). AMH was positively correlated with AFC (Spearman rho = 0.756). The AMH at 90% sensitivity for AFC >15 was 1.75, with specificity of 59.1%., Conclusion(s): A fully automated AMH assay can be a useful biomarker for predicting POR in IVF cycles. Because AMH cutoff points vary depending on the assay used, future studies should continue to calibrate test results to clinically important outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of a vaginal progesterone (P(4)) insert (Endometrin) for luteal support for assisted reproductive technology (ART)., Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label (assessor-blinded) phase III clinical trial., Setting: Twenty-five U.S. ART centers., Patient(s): A total of 1,211 ART patients randomized to three groups: Endometrin 100 mg twice daily (n = 404), Endometrin 100 mg three times daily (n = 404), and P(4) 90 mg 8% gel daily (n = 403)., Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization and ET were performed according to site-specific protocols. The day after oocyte retrieval, Endometrin or vaginal P(4) gel was begun for luteal support and continued for up to 10 weeks of pregnancy., Main Outcome Measure(s): Biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates., Result(s): Pregnancy rates were high and similar in all treatment groups, with biochemical rates exceeding 50%, clinical and ongoing rates >or=40%, and live birth rates at 35%-38%. The adverse event profiles were similar across groups., Conclusion(s): Pregnancy rates and live birth rates for Endometrin (twice daily and three times daily) were high and similar to those for P(4) gel. The adverse event profiles for both were similar to that for P(4) gel and primarily due to IVF stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Endometrin was safe and well tolerated.

Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease is a common gynecologic diagnosis in women with chronic pelvic pain. When standard antimicrobial therapy does not improve the clinical status, uncommon diagnoses such as Enterobius vermicularis should be considered. In this case, E vermicularis presented as acute and chronic salpingitis in a patient who had had E vermicularis-related appendicitis 5 years earlier.

The effect on fertilization and development of local anesthetics routinely used during ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval in women undergoing in vitro fertilization was examined in a mouse in vitro fertilization system. Mouse oocytes were exposed in vitro to lidocaine, chloroprocaine, and bupivacaine at concentrations of 0 (control), 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0 micrograms/mL for 30 min, washed, and then inseminated. In vitro oocyte fertilization at 24 and 48 h and embryo development at 72 h were determined. Bupivacaine adversely affected mouse in vitro fertilization and embryo development only at the highest exposure concentration, 100 micrograms/mL, while lidocaine and chloroprocaine produced adverse effects at concentrations as low as 1.0 and 0.1 microgram/mL, respectively. Furthermore, an adverse dose-related effect on fertilization and embryo development was shown for lidocaine and chloroprocaine, but not for bupivacaine. These data demonstrate that the local anesthetics, lidocaine (L), chloroprocaine (C), and bupivacaine (B), adversely affect mouse in vitro fertilization and embryo development in the order of C greater than L greater than B.