Search

Knowledge of protein structure is paramount to the understanding of biological function, developing new therapeutics, and making detailed mechanistic hypotheses. Therefore, methods to accurately elucidate three-dimensional structures of proteins are in high demand. While there are a few experimental techniques that can routinely provide high-resolution structures, such as x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-EM, which have been developed to determine the structures of proteins, these techniques each have shortcomings and thus cannot be used in all cases. However, additionally, a large number of experimental techniques that provide some structural information, but not enough to assign atomic positions with high certainty have been developed. These methods offer sparse experimental data, which can also be noisy and inaccurate in some instances. In cases where it is not possible to determine the structure of a protein experimentally, computational structure prediction methods can be used as an alternative. Although computational methods can be performed without any experimental data in a large number of studies, inclusion of sparse experimental data into these prediction methods has yielded significant improvement. In this Perspective, we cover many of the successes of integrative modeling, computational modeling with experimental data, specifically for protein folding, protein–protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. We describe methods that incorporate sparse data from cryo-EM, NMR, mass spectrometry, electron paramagnetic resonance, small-angle x-ray scattering, Förster resonance energy transfer, and genetic sequence covariation. Finally, we highlight some of the major challenges in the field as well as possible future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Native Mass Spectrometry (nMS) is a versatile technique for elucidating protein structure. Surface-Induced Dissociation (SID) is an activation method in tandem MS predominantly employed for determining protein complex stoichiometry alongside information about interface strengths. SID-nMS data can be collected over a range of acceleration energies, yielding Energy Resolved Mass Spectrometry (ERMS) data. Previous work demonstrated that the onset and appearance energy from SID-nMS can be used in integrative computational and experimental modeling to guide multimeric structure determination in some cases. However, the appearance energy is a single data point, while the ERMS data provide a full pattern of interface breakage. We hypothesized that incorporation of ERMS data into multimeric protein structure prediction would significantly outperform appearance energy. To test this hypothesis, we generated models of 20 protein complexes with RosettaDock using subunits generated from AlphaFold2. We simulated the ERMS data for each predicted model and rescored based on its agreement to experimental ERMS data. We demonstrated that more accurately predicted models exhibited simulated ERMS data in better agreement with the experimental data. As part of our ERMS-based rescoring, we matched or improved the RMSD of the best scoring model compared to Rosetta in 16 out of 20 cases, with 4 out of 20 cases improving to become a highly accurate (below 5 Å) structure. Finally, we benchmarked our method against our previously published appearance energy-based rescoring and showed improvement in 14 out of 20 cases, with 6 out of 20 becoming a highly accurate (below 5 Å) model. Our method is freely available through Rosetta Commons, with a usage tutorial and test files provided in the Supporting Information.