Search

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders. However, no studies examine how psychiatric disorders influence surgical and financial outcomes. This study aimed to assess impact of a psychiatric diagnosis on patients treated for HS. Methods Patients with HS were retrospectively identified at a single institution from 2010 to 2021. Cohorts were stratified by the presence of a psychiatric disorder. Demographics, comorbidities, and disease characteristics were collected. Outcomes assessed included the procedural interventions and emergency department (ED) visits. Financial distress was assessed via the COST-FACIT Version 2 survey. Results Out of 138 patients, 40 (29.0%) completed the survey of which 19 (47.5%) had a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis. No demographic differences were found between cohorts. Mean follow-up was 16.1 ± 11.0 months. The psychiatric cohort had a higher median number of surgeries received (7.0 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001), a higher median number of ED visits (1.0 vs. 0, p = 0.006), and a similar hospital length of stay (p = 0.456). The mean COST-FACIT score of the overall study population was 19.2 ± 10.7 (grade 1 financial toxicity). The psych cohort had a lower mean COST-FACIT score (16.8 vs. 21.3, p = 0.092) and reported greater financial hardship (3.3 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, a psychiatric diagnosis was predictive of lower credit scores, more ED visits, and a higher number of surgeries. Conclusion Preexisting psychiatric conditions in patients with HS are associated with increased health care utilization and surgical intervention with substantial financial distress. Plastic surgeons should be cognizant of such comorbid disorders to facilitate holistic care addressing all patient needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that confers a substantial financial burden to patients. The aim of the current study was to assess the patient‐reported financial impact of HS. Patients presenting to a wound center between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, and disease characteristics were collected. The financial impact of HS was assessed via the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity ‐ Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST‐FACIT) version 2 and investigator‐generated surveys. Of 199 patients contacted, 27.1% (n = 54) completed the survey. The majority were women (77.8%, n = 42) and had private health insurance (n = 30; 55.6%). Most patients (66.7%, n = 36) had Hurley stage III disease. Mean follow‐up was 2.3 + 2.8 years. The overall COST score was 19.7 + 12.4, indicating grade 1 financial toxicity (FT). Grade 0 FT was reported in 31.5% (n = 17) of patients, grade 1 in 37.0% (n = 20), grade 2 in 27.8% (n = 15), and grade 3 in 3.7% (n = 2). The mean self‐reported 12‐month out‐of‐pocket cost and credit scores were $2250 + 3269.24 and 674.6 + 95.3, respectively. Patients with private insurance had lower FT compared with Medicaid and Medicare (p = 0.003). Higher out‐of‐pocket costs were positively correlated with FT (p = 0.042), while higher credit scores were negatively correlated (p = 0.003). Patients with HS lesions in three or more anatomic regions reported the highest FT (p = 0.031). HS is a debilitating skin disorder that affects the livelihood of patients in a multifaceted manner. These patient‐reported outcomes highlight the impact that HS has on an individual's financial security, calling for further attention to this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]