Search

This retrospective review of 4-year surveillance data revealed a higher central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate in non-Hispanic Black patients and higher catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates in Asian and non-Hispanic Black patients compared with White patients despite similar catheter utilization between the groups.

Objective: Urine cultures collected from catheterized patients have a high likelihood of false-positive results due to colonization. We examined the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that includes catheter information on test utilization and patient-level outcomes. Methods: This before-and-after intervention study was conducted at 3 hospitals in North Carolina. In March 2021, a CDS tool was incorporated into urine-culture order entry in the electronic health record, providing education about indications for culture and suggesting catheter removal or exchange prior to specimen collection for catheters present >7 days. We used an interrupted time-series analysis with Poisson regression to evaluate the impact of CDS implementation on utilization of urinalyses and urine cultures, antibiotic use, and other outcomes during the pre- and postintervention periods. Results: The CDS tool was prompted in 38,361 instances of urine cultures ordered in all patients, including 2,133 catheterized patients during the postintervention study period. There was significant decrease in urine culture orders (1.4% decrease per month; P < .001) and antibiotic use for UTI indications (2.3% decrease per month; P = .006), but there was no significant decline in CAUTI rates in the postintervention period. Clinicians opted for urinary catheter removal in 183 (8.5%) instances. Evaluation of the safety reporting system revealed no apparent increase in safety events related to catheter removal or reinsertion. Conclusion: CDS tools can aid in optimizing urine culture collection practices and can serve as a reminder for removal or exchange of long-term indwelling urinary catheters at the time of urine-culture collection.

Background:Clinicians and laboratories routinely use urinalysis (UA) parameters to determine whether antimicrobial treatment and/or urine cultures are needed. Yet the performance of individual UA parameters and common thresholds for action are not well defined and may vary across different patient populations.Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, we included all encounters with UAs ordered 24 hours prior to a urine culture between 2015 and 2020 at 3 North Carolina hospitals. We evaluated the performance of relevant UA parameters as potential outcome predictors, including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). We also combined 18 different UA criteria and used receiver operating curves to identify the 5 best-performing models for predicting significant bacteriuria (≥100,000 colony-forming units of bacteria/mL).Results:In 221,933 encounters during the 6-year study period, no single UA parameter had both high sensitivity and high specificity in predicting bacteriuria. Absence of leukocyte esterase and pyuria had a high NPV for significant bacteriuria. Combined UA parameters did not perform better than pyuria alone with regard to NPV. The high NPV ≥0.90 of pyuria was maintained among most patient subgroups except females aged ≥65 years and patients with indwelling catheters.Conclusion:When used as a part of a diagnostic workup, UA parameters should be leveraged for their NPV instead of sensitivity. Because many laboratories and hospitals use reflex urine culture algorithms, their workflow should include clinical decision support and or education to target symptomatic patients and focus on populations where absence of pyuria has high NPV.

We reviewed the sustainability of a multifaceted intervention on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in 3 intensive care units. During the 4-year postintervention period, we observed reductions in urine culture rates (from 80.9 to 47.5 per 1,000 patient days; P < .01), catheter utilization (from 0.68 to 0.58; P < .01), and CAUTI incidence rates (from 1.7 to 0.8 per 1,000 patient days; P = .16).

Antibiotics are among the leading causes of adverse drug events in older adults. Short-course antibiotic therapy has been shown to work as well as the traditional longer durations for many types of infections. Antibiotic stewardship interventions including deprescribing strategies have shown a reduction in patient readmissions and mortality among older adults. We identified practice-changing clinical trials focusing on three major domains of overprescribing antibiotics in older adults - community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and gram-negative bacteremia. The selected articles underscore the safety and effectiveness of shorter durations of antibiotic treatment for infections in older adults, thus highlighting an opportunity for deprescribing in the aging population. By optimizing antibiotic use, we stand to reduce adverse events and enhance overall health outcomes in older adults.

Mutations accumulated by novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron sublineages contribute to evasion of previously effective monoclonal antibodies for treatment or prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Other authorized or approved antiviral drugs such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, and molnupiravir are, however, predicted to maintain activity against these sublineages and are key tools to reduce severe COVID-19 outcomes in vulnerable populations. A stepwise approach may be taken to target the appropriate antiviral drug to the appropriate patient, beginning with identifying whether a patient is at high risk for hospitalization or other complications of COVID-19. Among higher risk individuals, patient profile (including factors such as age, organ function, and comedications) and antiviral drug access inform suitable antiviral drug selection. When applied in targeted fashion, these therapies serve as a complement to vital ongoing nonpharmaceutical interventions and vaccination strategies that reduce morbidity and maximize protection against COVID-19.

Initial assessments of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness revealed resource shortages and variations in infection prevention policies across US hospitals. Our follow-up survey revealed improvement in resource availability, increase in testing capacity, and uniformity in infection prevention policies. Most importantly, the survey highlighted an increase in staffing shortages and use of travel nursing.

Background Inequities in healthcare among racial and ethnic minorities are globally recognized. The focus has centered on access to healthcare, equitable treatment, and optimizing outcomes. However, there has been relatively little investigation into potential racial and ethnic disparities in HAI. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of select HAI prospectively-collected by a network of community hospitals in the southeastern US, including central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and laboratory-identified Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Outcomes were stratified by race/ethnicity as captured in the electronic medical record. We defined the pre-pandemic period from 1/1/2019 to 2/29/2020 and the pandemic period from 3/1/2020 to 6/30/2021. Outcomes were reported by race/ethnicity as a proportion of the total events. Relative rates were compared using Poisson regression. Results Overall, relatively few facilities consistently collect race/ethnicity information in surveillance databases within this hospital network (< 40%). Among 21 reporting hospitals, a greater proportion of CLABSI occurred in Black patients relative to White patients in both study periods (pre-pandemic, 49% vs 38%; during pandemic, 47% vs 31%; respectively, Figure 1a), while a higher proportion of CAUTI and CDI occurred in White patients (Figures 1b-c). Black patients had a 30% higher likelihood of CLABSI than White patients in the pre-COVID period (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.83-2.05), which was not statistically significant (Table 1). However, this risk significantly increased to 51% after the start of the pandemic (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.24). Similar trends were not observed in other HAI (Tables 2-3). Conclusion We found differences in HAI rates by race/ethnicity in a network of community hospitals. Black patients had higher likelihood of CLABSI, and this likelihood increased during the pandemic. Patient safety events, including HAI, may differ across racial and ethnic groups and negatively impact health outcomes. Disclosures Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, FIDSA, Locus Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Locus Biosciences: Honoraria|Sysmex America: Advisor/Consultant.

Background Increases in central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates have been reported in association with the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among Candida species and coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species (CoNS). We sought to further validate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSI trends and perform a microbiologic analysis. Methods This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of CLABSIs across a network of 38 community hospitals in southeastern United States. CLABSI rates were compared between pre-pandemic (1/1/2018-3/30/2020) and pandemic periods (4/1/2020-12/31/2021). Regression models were developed to evaluate CLABSI incidence over time. Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare models that were exclusively time-dependent to segmented regression models that also accounted for the COVID-19 pandemic. Results A total of 1,167 CLABSIs over 1,345,062 central line days were analyzed (Table 1). The mean monthly CLABSI rate per hospital increased from 0.63 to 1.01 per 1,000 central line days (p< 0.001) in the pandemic period (Table 1). CLABSIs secondary to Candida (0.16 to 0.33, p< 0.001), CoNS (0.09 to 0.22, p< 0.001), and Enterococcal species (0.06 to 0.18, p=0.001) increased, while Escherichia coli CLABSIs decreased (0.04 to 0.01, p< 0.001). Upon regression modeling, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in monthly CLABSI rates by Candida and Enterococcus species (Figure 1). In contrast, the changes in CoNS and Escherichia coli CLABSI rates were better explained by exclusively time-dependent models (Figure 1; Table 2). Non-sustained changes in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae CLABSI rates were also noted (Table 2). Table 1:Count data, central line days, and mean monthly CLABSI incidence by organism per hospital. Rates are provided as CLABSIs per 1,000 central line days. Figure 1:Regression analysis of monthly CLABSI rates by pathogen. Gray areas denote COVID-19 pandemic period. Statistically significant level changes in CLABSI rates were observed among Candida and Enterococcus spp. (RR=1.92, CI 1.16-3.20 and 2.42, CI 1.09-5.38). Staphylococcus aureus CLABSI rates had a non-sustained but significant increase at the onset of COVID-19 (RR 2.20, CI 1.16-4.20). CoNS and E. coli rate changes occurred independent of COVID-19 (see Table 2). Table 2:Coefficient table of regression analyses for CLABSI rates by pathogen. Exclusively time-dependent models were compared to segmented regression models for each organism and, if no significant difference was noted between models, only the time-dependent model was applied. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial increases in CLABSIs, driven in part by Candida and Enterococcus species across this network of hospitals. However, the observed increase in CoNS CLABSIs and decrease in Escherichia coli CLABSIs appear to have occurred independently of COVID-19, which only became apparent upon regression analysis. Interpretation of pre-post statistics without assessment of pre-existing trends should be done cautiously. Additional analyses may help elucidate other factors influencing these CLABSI trends by organism. Disclosures Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, FIDSA, Locus Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Locus Biosciences: Honoraria|Sysmex America: Advisor/Consultant Melissa D. Johnson, PharmD, MHS, AAHIVP, Charles River Laboratories: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Honoraria|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies: Honoraria|UpToDate: Honoraria.

Background Standard urine culture collection techniques have a high risk of false positive results in catheterized patients. IDSA guidelines recommend replacing long-term catheters before specimen collection for cultures. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) during the urine culture computerized provider order entry (CPOE) on test use and patient-level outcomes. Methods In March 2021, CDS was added to the urine culture CPOE in the electronic health record (EHR). The order panel includes education regarding appropriate clinical indications for urine culturing, and protocolizes urine collection to determine (A) if a urinalysis was ordered, (B) if special patient population (i.e., PICU), (C) the presence and duration of an indwelling urinary catheter, and (D) whether the catheter had difficulty with placement. Depending on the criteria identified in A, B, C, and D, the panel recommends catheter removal prior to urine culture (Figure 1). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of panel implementation in our pre- (7/2020- 3/2021) and post-intervention periods (4/2021- 3/2022) using an interrupted time series analysis with Poisson regression. Outcomes included urine cultures/1000 patient days (pd), number of catheter removal orders, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI)/1000 catheter days, and days of antibiotic therapy with urinary tract infection (UTI) indication/1000pd Order Panel Framework Results Clinicians selected catheter removal in 183 of 2133 (8.5%) instances of ordering a urine culture when a catheter was detected by the panel (Figure 2). Analysis revealed a significant decrease in urine culture orders (1.1% decrease/month, p< 0.05), a decreasing trend of antibiotic use with UTI indications (Figure 3, 2.8% decrease/month, p< 0.05), but no significant change in CAUTI rates (Figure 4). Evaluation of the safety reporting system revealed no identifiable increase in safety events related to catheter removal or reinsertion. Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates Conclusion CDS can aid in improving urine culture practice habits, including removal of long-standing catheters before urine culture. The decreasing trend in total urine culture orders (Figure 5) may reflect a ”culture change” over time to avoid urine cultures in inappropriate instances. Total Urine Cultures Ordered Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates. Red circles indicate predicted outcome without ‘intervention’. Disclosures Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, FIDSA, Locus Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Locus Biosciences: Honoraria|Sysmex America: Advisor/Consultant.

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections have high mortality and morbidity. CIED infections secondary to gram-negative pathogens are rare, and there are few data regarding their treatment. We report a case of a 60-year-old male who developed recurrent Salmonella enteritidis bacteremia leading to CIED infection and nonsusceptibility to ciprofloxacin.

Background COVID-19 shifted antibiotic stewardship program resources and changed antibiotic use (AU). Shifts in patient populations with COVID surges, including pauses to surgical procedures, and dynamic practice changes makes temporal associations difficult to interpret. Our analysis aimed to address the impact of COVID on AU after adjusting for other practice shifts. Methods We performed a longitudinal analysis of AU data from 30 Southeast US hospitals. Three pandemic phases (1: 3/20–6/20; 2: 7/20–10/20; 3: 11/20–2/21) were compared to baseline (1/2018–1/2020). AU (days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient days (PD)) was collected for all antimicrobial agents and specific subgroups: broad spectrum (NHSN group for hospital-onset infections), CAP (ceftriaxone, azithromycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and doxycycline), and antifungal. Monthly COVID burden was defined as all PD attributed to a COVID admission. We fit negative binomial GEE models to AU including phase and interaction terms between COVID burden and phase to test the hypothesis that AU changes during the phases were related to COVID burden. Models included adjustment for Charlson comorbidity, surgical volume, time since 12/2017 and seasonality. Results Observed AU rates by subgroup varied over time; peaks were observed for different subgroups during distinct pandemic phases (Figure). Compared to baseline, we observed a significant increase in overall, broad spectrum, and CAP groups during phase 1 (Table). In phase 2, overall and CAP AU was significantly higher than baseline, but in phase 3, AU was similar to baseline. These phase changes were separate from effects of COVID burden, except in phase 1 where we observed significant effects on antifungal (increased) and CAP (decreased) AU (Table). Conclusion Changes in hospital AU observed during early phases of the COVID pandemic appeared unrelated to COVID burden and may have been due to indirect pandemic effects (e.g., case mix, healthcare resource shifts). By pandemic phase 3, these disruptive effects were not as apparent, potentially related to shifts in non-COVID patient populations or ASP resources, availability of COVID treatments, or increased learning, diagnostic certainty, and provider comfort with avoiding antibacterials in patients with suspected COVID over time. Disclosures Melissa D. Johnson, PharmD, Biomeme: Licensed Transcriptional Signature for Candidemia|Charles River Laboratories: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Merck & Co. Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Merck & Co. Inc: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies: Advisor/Consultant Angelina Davis, PharmD, M.S., Merck & Co.: Honoraria Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, FIDSA, Locus Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Locus Biosciences: Honoraria|Sysmex America: Advisor/Consultant Ibukun Kalu, MD, Pfizer, Inc.: Institutional support for clinical trial Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, FIDSA, FSHEA, UpToDate, Inc.: Author Royalties.

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections have high mortality and morbidity. CIED infections secondary to gram-negative pathogens are rare, and there are few data regarding their treatment. We report a case of a 60-year-old male who developed recurrent

IMPORTANCE: Cefepime/enmetazobactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and a potential empirical therapy for resistant gram-negative infections. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether cefepime/enmetazobactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam for the primary outcome of treatment efficacy in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) or acute pyelonephritis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial conducted at 90 sites in Europe, North and Central America, South America, and South Africa. Recruitment occurred between September 24, 2018, and November 2, 2019. Final follow-up occurred November 26, 2019. Participants were adult patients aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative urinary pathogens. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive either cefepime, 2 g/enmetazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 520), or piperacillin, 4 g/tazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 521), by 2-hour infusion every 8 hours for 7 days (up to 14 days in patients with a positive blood culture at baseline). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in the primary analysis set (patients who received any amount of study drug with a baseline gram-negative pathogen not resistant to either treatment and ≥10(5) colony-forming units [CFU]/mL in urine culture or the same pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures) who achieved overall treatment success (defined as clinical cure combined with microbiological eradication [

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are challenging populations for antimicrobial stewardship interventions due to a variety of reasons, including immunosuppression, consequent risk of opportunistic and donor-derived infections, high rates of infection with multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), Clostridioides difficile, and need for prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. Despite this, data on stewardship interventions and metrics that address the distinct needs of these patients are limited.We performed a narrative review of the current state of antimicrobial stewardship in SOT recipients, existing interventions and metrics in this population, and considerations for implementation of transplant-specific stewardship programs.Antimicrobial stewardship metrics are evolving even in the general patient population. Data on metrics applicable to the SOT population are even more limited. Standard process, outcomes, and balancing metrics may not always apply to the SOT population. A successful stewardship program for SOT recipients requires reviewing existing data, applying general stewardship principles, and understanding the nuances of SOT patients.As antimicrobial stewardship interventions are being implemented in SOT recipients; new metrics are needed to assess their impact. In conclusion, SOT patients present a challenging but important opportunity for antimicrobial stewards.SOT, antimicrobial stewardship program, MDRO, Clostridioides difficile infection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, prospective audit and feedback, hematopoietic cell transplant, cytomegalovirus, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, surgical site infections, nucleic acid amplification testing, days of therapy, defined daily dose, and length of stay.

Objectives: To describe the epidemiology of complex colon surgical procedures (COLO), stratified by present at time of surgery (PATOS) surgical-site infections (SSIs) and non-PATOS SSIs and their impact on the epidemiology of colon-surgery SSIs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: SSI data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing colon surgical procedures (COLOs) as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) at 34 community hospitals in the southeastern United States from January 2015 to June 2019. Logistic regression models identified specific characteristics of complex COLO SSIs, complex non-PATOS COLO SSIs, and complex PATOS COLO SSIs. Results: Over the 4.5-year study period, we identified 720 complex COLO SSIs following 28,188 COLO surgeries (prevalence rate, 2.55 per 100 procedures). Overall, 544 complex COLO SSIs (76%) were complex non-PATOS COLO SSIs (prevalence rate [PR], 1.93 per 100 procedures) and 176 (24%) complex PATOS COLO SSIs (PR, 0.62 per 100 procedures). Age >75 years and operation duration in the >75th percentile were independently associated with non-PATOS SSIs but not PATOS SSIs. Conversely, emergency surgery and hospital volume for COLO procedures were independently associated with PATOS SSIs but not non-PATOS SSIs. The proportion of polymicrobial SSIs was significantly higher for non-PATOS SSIs compared with PATOS SSIs. Conclusions: Complex PATOS COLO SSIs have distinct features from complex non-PATOS COLO SSIs. Removal of PATOS COLO SSIs from public reporting allows more accurate comparisons among hospitals that perform different case mixes of colon surgeries.

Objective:Sparse recent data are available on the epidemiology of surgical site infections (SSIs) in community hospitals. Our objective was to provide updated epidemiology data on complex SSIs in community hospitals and to characterize trends of SSI prevalence rates over time.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Methods:SSI data were collected from patients undergoing 26 commonly performed surgical procedures at 32 community hospitals in the southeastern United States from 2013 to 2018. SSI prevalence rates were calculated for each year and were stratified by procedure and causative pathogen.Results:Over the 6-year study period, 3,561 complex (deep incisional or organ-space) SSIs occurred following 669,467 total surgeries (prevalence rate, 0.53 infections per 100 procedures). The overall complex SSI prevalence rate did not change significantly during the study period: 0.58 of 100 procedures in 2013 versus 0.53 of 100 procedures in 2018 (prevalence rate ratio [PRR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66–1.08; P = .16). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) complex SSIs (n = 480, 13.5%) were more common than complex SSIs caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; n = 363, 10.2%).Conclusions:The complex SSI rate did not decrease in our cohort of community hospitals from 2013 to 2018, which is a change from prior comparisons. The reason for this stagnation is unclear. Additional research is needed to determine the proportion of or remaining SSIs that are preventable and what measures would be effective to further reduce SSI rates.

Purpose To assess the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with (Clostridioides difficile infection) CDI following urological surgery, which is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea and a growing public health burden. Methods We queried the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to identify patients undergoing urological surgery in 2015–2016. We evaluated the 30-day incidence and factors associated with postoperative CDI and 30-day hospital readmission and length of stay as secondary outcomes. Among the subset of patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (surgery with highest CDI incidence) we used multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate independent clinical and demographic factors associated with postoperative CDI. Results We identified 98,463 patients during the study period. The overall 30-day incidence of CDI was 0.31%, but varied considerably across surgery type. The risk of CDI was greatest following radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (2.72%) compared to all other urologic procedures (0.19%) and was associated with increased risk of hospital readmission (p

The COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact on US healthcare systems, straining hospital resources, staff, and operations. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact on healthcare associated infections (HAIs) across different hospitals with varying level of infectious disease (ID) physician expertise, resources, and infrastructure is lacking.This retrospective longitudinal multi-center cohort study included central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), C. difficile infections (CDIs), and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) from 53 hospitals (academic and community) in Southeastern United States from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. Segmented negative binomial regression generalized estimating equations models estimated changes in monthly incidence rates in the baseline (01/2018 - 02/2020) compared to the pandemic period (03/2020 - 03/2021, further divided into three pandemic phases).CLABSIs and VAEs increased by 24% and 34% respectively during the pandemic period. VAEs increased in all phases of the pandemic, while CLABSIs increased in later phases of the pandemic. CDI trend increased by 4.2% per month in the pandemic period. On stratifying the analysis by hospital characteristics, the impact of the pandemic on healthcare-associated infections was more significant in smaller sized and community hospitals. CAUTIs did not change significantly during the pandemic across all hospital types.CLABSIs, VAEs, and CDIs increased significantly during the pandemic, especially in smaller community hospitals, most of which lack ID physician expertise. Future efforts should focus on better understanding challenges faced by community hospitals, strengthening infection prevention infrastructure, and expanding the ID workforce, particularly to community hospitals.

The paradoxical relationship between standardized infection ratio and standardized utilization ratio for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in contrast to central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), in addition to CAUTI definition challenges, incentivizes hospitals to focus their prevention efforts on urine culture stewardship rather than catheter avoidance and care.

We performed a cross-sectional survey of infection preventionists in 60 US community hospitals between April 22 and May 8, 2020. Several differences in hospital preparedness for SARS-CoV-2 emerged with respect to personal protective equipment conservation strategies, protocols related to testing, universal masking, and restarting elective procedures.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this article is to highlight how and why urinalyses and urine cultures are misused, review quality improvement interventions to optimize urine culture utilization, and highlight how to implement successful, sustainable interventions to improve urine culture practices in the acute care setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Quality improvement initiatives aimed at reducing inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria often focus on optimizing urine test utilization (i.e., urine culture stewardship). Urine culture stewardship interventions in acute care hospitals span the spectrum of quality improvement initiatives, ranging from strong systems-based interventions like suppression of urine culture results to weaker interventions that focus on clinician education alone. While most urine culture stewardship interventions have met with some success, overall results are mixed, and implementation strategies to improve sustainability are not well understood. SUMMARY: Successful diagnostic stewardship interventions are based on an assessment of underlying key drivers and focus on multifaceted and complementary approaches. Individual intervention components have varying impacts on effectiveness, provider autonomy, and sustainability. The best urine culture stewardship strategies ultimately include both technical and socio-adaptive components with long-term, iterative feedback required for sustainability.

We performed a descriptive study of reflex urine culture (RUC) practices across 51 community hospitals in southeastern United States. We found that 26 unique reflexing criteria were used in 28 hospitals. Only 14% hospitals of hospitals that offered RUC restricted it to specific populations (eg, emergency room). Our data suggest that the current RUC approach in community hospitals warrants further validation of urinalysis criteria and identification of specific populations in which RUC performs best.

Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs are required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and should ideally have infectious diseases (ID) physician involvement; however, only 50% of ID fellowship programs have formal AS curricula. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) formed a workgroup to develop a core AS curriculum for ID fellows. Here we study its impact. Methods ID program directors and fellows in 56 fellowship programs were surveyed regarding the content and effectiveness of their AS training before and after implementation of the IDSA curriculum. Fellows’ knowledge was assessed using multiple-choice questions. Fellows completing their first year of fellowship were surveyed before curriculum implementation (“pre-curriculum”) and compared to first-year fellows who complete the curriculum the following year (“post-curriculum”). Results Forty-nine (88%) program directors and 105 (67%) fellows completed the pre-curriculum surveys; 35 (64%) program directors and 79 (50%) fellows completed the post-curriculum surveys. Prior to IDSA curriculum implementation, only 51% of programs had a “formal” curriculum. After implementation, satisfaction with AS training increased among program directors (16% to 68%) and fellows (51% to 68%). Fellows’ confidence increased in 7/10 AS content areas. Knowledge scores improved from a mean of 4.6 to 5.1 correct answers of 9 questions (P = .028). The major hurdle to curriculum implementation was time, both for formal teaching and for e-learning. Conclusions Effective AS training is a critical component of ID fellowship training. The IDSA Core AS Curriculum can enhance AS training, increase fellow confidence, and improve overall satisfaction of fellows and program directors.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact on US healthcare systems, straining hospital resources, staff, and operations. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and trends of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in a network of hospitals. Methods This was a retrospective review of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), C. difficile infections (CDI), and ventilator-associated events (VAE) in 51 hospitals from 2018 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were reported as mean hospital-level monthly incidence rates (IR) and compared using Poisson regression GEE models with period as the only covariate. Segmented regression (SR) analysis was performed to estimate changes in monthly IR of CAUTIs, CLABSIs and CDI in the baseline period (01/2018 – 02/2020) and the Pandemic period (03/2020 – 03/2021). SR model was not appropriate for VAE based on the plot. All models were constructed using SAS v.9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC). Results Compared to the baseline period, CLABSIs increased significantly by 50% from 0.6 to 0.9/ 1000 catheter days (P< 0. 001). In contrast, no significant changes were identified for CAUTI (P=0.87). Similar trends were seen in SR models for CLABSI and CAUTI (Figures 1, 2 and Table 1). While overall CDIs decreased significantly from 3.5 to 2.5/10,000 patient days in the pandemic period (P< 0.001), SR model showed increasing pandemic trend change (Figure 3). VAEs increased > 700% from 6.9 to 59.7/1000 ventilator days (P=0.15), but displayed considerable variation during the pandemic period (Figure 4). Compared to baseline period, there was a significant increase in central line days (647 vs 677, P=0.02), ventilator days (156 vs 215, P< 0.001), but no change in urinary catheter days (675 vs 686, P=0.32) during the pandemic period. Figure 1: Segmented Regression model showing baseline and pandemic period trends of CLABSI Figure 2: Segmented Regression model showing baseline and pandemic period trends of CAUTI Figure 3: Segmented Regression model showing baseline and pandemic period trends of C. difficile (HO-CDI) infections Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial increases in CLABSIs and VAEs, no change in CAUTIs, and an increasing trend in CDI incidence. These variations in trends of different HAIs are likely due, in part, to unique characteristics of the underlying infection, resource shortages, staffing concerns, increased device use, changes in testing practices, and the limitations of surveillance definitions. Figure 4: Trend of Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE) in the baseline and pandemic period (Segmented Regression model not appropriate) Disclosures Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, Nothing to disclose David J. Weber, MD, MPH, Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; PDI (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Sanofi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; UVinnovators (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant

Background The COVID-19 pandemic placed a strain on inpatient clinical and hospital programs due to increased patient volume and rapidly evolving data on best COVID-19 management strategies. However, the impact of the pandemic on ASPs has not been well described. Methods We performed a cross-sectional electronic survey of stewardship pharmacy and physician leaders in 37 hospitals within the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) (community) and Duke/UNC Health systems (academic) in April-May 2021. The survey included 60 questions related to staffing changes, use of COVID-targeted therapies, related restrictions, and medication shortages. Results Twenty-seven facilities responded (response rate of 73%). Pharmacy personnel was reduced in 17 (63%) facilities by an average of 16%. Impacted pharmacy personnel included the stewardship lead in 15/17 (88.2%) hospitals. Converting to remote work was rare and only reported in academic institutions (n=2, 7.4%). ASP personnel were reassigned to non-stewardship duties in 12 (44%) hospitals with only half returning to routine ASP work as of May 2021. Respondents estimated that 62% of routine ASP activities were diverted during the time of the pandemic. Non-traditional, pandemic-related ASP activities included managing multiple drug shortages, of which ventilator support medications (91%) were most common affecting patient care at 52% of facilities. Steroid and hydroxychloroquine shortages were less frequent (44% and 22%, respectively). Despite staff reductions, pharmacists often served as primary contact for remdesivir approvals either using a criteria-based checklist at dispensing or as part of a dedicated phone approval team (Figure). Most (77%) hospitals used a criteria-based pharmacist review strategy after remdesivir FDA approval. Restriction processes for other COVID-19 therapies such as tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin were reported in 64% of hospitals. Remdesivir Allocation Strategy Proportion of facilities implementing specific remdesivir allocation strategies from the time of the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) through FDA approval Conclusion Pandemic response diverted routine ASP work and has not yet returned to baseline. Despite the reduction in pharmacy personnel due to the pandemic, the ASP pharmacy lead took on a novel and critical stewardship role throughout the pandemic exemplified by their involvement in novel treatment allocation for COVID patients. Disclosures Melissa D. Johnson, PharmD, MHS, Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Charles River Laboratories (Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant)Merck & Co (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant)Scynexis (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Theratechnologies (Consultant)UpToDate (Other Financial or Material Support, Author Royalties) Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, Nothing to disclose Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, UpToDate, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Author Royalties)

Professional societies serve many functions that benefit constituents; however, few professional societies have undertaken the development and dissemination of formal, national curricula to train the future workforce while simultaneously addressing significant healthcare needs. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has developed 2 curricula for the specific purpose of training the next generation of clinicians to ensure the future infectious diseases (ID) workforce is optimally trained to lead antimicrobial stewardship programs and equipped to meet the challenges of multidrug resistance, patient safety, and healthcare quality improvement. A core curriculum was developed to provide a foundation in antimicrobial stewardship for all ID fellows, regardless of career path. An advanced curriculum was developed for ID fellows specifically pursuing a career in antimicrobial stewardship. Both curricula will be broadly available in the summer of 2021 through the IDSA website.

Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has placed a tremendous strain on the U.S. healthcare system leading to personal protective equipment (PPE) and resource shortages. Hospitals have developed contingency and crisis capacity strategies to optimize the use of resources, but, to date, community hospital preparedness has not been described. Methods We performed a cross-sectional survey of infection preventionists in 60 community hospitals within the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network between April 22 and May 7, 2020 using Qualtrics. The survey included 13 questions related to resource availability, crisis capacity strategies and approaches to testing. Results We received 50 responses during the study period with a response rate of 83%. Community hospitals reported varying degrees of PPE shortages (Table 1); 80% of community hospitals were implementing strategies to extend and reuse N95 respirators, Powered Air-Purifying Respirators, face shields and face masks. Over 70% of facilities reported reprocessing N95 respirators (Figure 1). Almost all facilities reported universal masking at time of this survey with 90% performing daily employee screening at point of entry. Additionally, 8% of facilities restarted elective procedures at the time of this survey, but only 54% of facilities reported that they were performing preoperative testing for SARS-CoV-2. Thirty-seven percent of facilities performed one SARS-CoV-2 test before discharging an asymptomatic patient to skilled nursing facility, while 43% of facilities performed 2 tests. Table 1- Supply of Personal Protective Equipment and other resources in 50 community hospitals in southeastern United States Figure 1: Different methods of reprocessing N95 respirators by 50 community hospitals in southeastern United States Conclusion Our findings reveal differences in resource availability, crisis capacity strategies and testing approaches used by community hospitals in preparation for the SARS-COV-2 pandemic. Lack of harmonization in approaches may be in part due to differences in state guidelines and decentralized federal approach to SARS-CoV-2 preparedness. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are frequent complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Surgical masks are a simple and inexpensive intervention that may reduce nosocomial spread.In this prospective single-center study, we instituted a universal surgical mask policy requiring all individuals with direct contact with HSCT patients to wear a surgical mask, regardless of symptoms or season. The primary endpoint was the incidence of RVIs in the mask period (2010-2014) compared with the premask period (2003-2009).RVIs decreased from 10.3% (95/920 patients) in the premask period to 4.4% (40/911) in the mask period (P.001). Significant decreases occurred after both allogeneic (64/378 [16.9%] to 24/289 [8.3%], P = .001) and autologous (31/542 [5.7%] to 16/622 [2.6%], P = .007) transplants. After adjusting for multiple covariates including season and year in a segmented longitudinal analysis, the decrease in RVIs remained significant, with risk of RVI of 0.4 in patients in the mask group compared with the premask group (0.19-0.85, P = .02). In contrast, no decrease was observed during this same period in an adjacent hematologic malignancy unit, which followed the same infection control practices except for the mask policy. The majority of this decrease was in parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV3) (8.3% to 2.2%, P.001).Requiring all individuals with direct patient contact to wear a surgical mask is associated with a reduction in RVIs, particularly PIV3, during the most vulnerable period following HSCT.

Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common causes of hospital-acquired infection. However, only sparse data are available on the recent epidemiology of SSIs in community hospitals. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected SSI data at 32 community hospitals in the southeastern United States from 2013 to 2018. We calculated the annual prevalence rates (PRs) of SSI for 26 commonly performed procedures and stratified results by causative pathogen. We used log-binomial regression models to examine trends of SSI prevalence over time. Results Over the 6-year study period, 3,561 complex (i.e., deep incisional or organ space) SSIs occurred following 669,467 total procedures (PR, 0.53 infections per 100 procedures). The complex SSI PR did not change significantly during the study period (0.58/100 procedures in 2013 versus 0.53/100 procedures in 2018; PR ratio [PRR], 0.84; 95% CI 0.66–1.08, p=0.16). For commonly performed procedures, rates of SSI in community hospitals were higher than 2018 National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) benchmark SSI rates for colon surgery, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and spinal fusion. (Table 1). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen to cause SSI each year and was responsible for 23.7% (n=843) of all complex SSIs. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) complex SSIs [13.5%, n=480] were more common than complex SSIs caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) [10.2%, n=363] (Figure 1). Compared to the 2013, the only significant decrease in S. aureus SSI PR occurred in 2017 (PRR 0.67 95% CI 0.49-0.90, p=0.01), which was primarily driven by the significant decrease in MRSA SSI PR in 2017 compared to 2013 (PRR 0.61 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p-value=0.01). The Escherichia coli SSI PRs did not change significantly during the study period, but E. coli became the second most prevalent pathogen in 2018, surpassing MRSA. Table 1. Community Hospital SSI Prevalence Rates for Commonly Performed Procedures Figure 1: Prevalence Rates of Community Hospital Complex SSIs by Causative Pathogen from 2013 to 2018 Conclusion The complex SSI rate did not significantly decline in our cohort of community hospitals from 2013 to 2018. Baseline SSI rates were low, and statistically significant decreases in SSI rates may be difficult to achieve. However, the epidemiology of community hospital SSIs may be changing with a shift away from MRSA SSIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has supported the development of the Core and Advanced Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) Curricula for fellows to ensure the future ID workforce is effectively prepared to practice, participate in and lead AS efforts in health care institutions. The Core AS Curriculum is currently available; the Advanced AS Curriculum pilot will begin July, 2020. Methods IDSA formed the AS Curriculum Workgroup, comprised of leaders in AS and medical education from institutions across the country, to lead the AS Curricula development process. The workgroup conducted two surveys of ID Fellowship Program Directors, one in 2016 for the core curriculum and a second in 2018 for the advanced curriculum, to assess existing AS educational resources and determine needs for additional AS educational and evaluation resources. The workgroup used the evaluation data to inform the content, delivery methods, and assessment tools for the curricula. The Core AS Curriculum is designed to provide fellows foundational knowledge and skills in AS. The Advanced AS Curriculum is designed to provide fellows the knowledge and skills to become leaders in AS. The Core AS Curriculum was piloted by 56 ID Fellowship Programs in 2018 and then made broadly available via IDSA Academy in 2019. Pilot data will be used to improve future iterations of the curriculum. The Advanced AS Curriculum pilot will begin in 2020 and will be broadly available in 2021. Results The curricular packages contain a variety of training resources including eLearning modules, lectures slides, case-based questions, videos, reading materials, pocket cards, group-based learning, role play exercises and simulations. The modules can be taught by faculty to fellows or conducted as a self-directed learning experience. Program directors and fellows who participated in the Core AS Curriculum pilot reported that their fellowship program was significantly more effective in teaching multiple key stewardship content areas (Table). Table. Conclusion Evaluation data from programs who piloted the Core AS Curriculum indicate that this blended learning experience is an effective method for teaching AS and in providing educational and assessment tools for ID fellowship programs. The Advanced AS Curriculum will be similarly evaluated. Disclosures Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, BCPS-AQ ID, bioMerieux (Speaker’s Bureau)TRC Healthcare (Speaker’s Bureau)

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis choice for transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) has been affected by the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (FQRE). Prebiopsy FQRE screening and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce post-TRPB bloodstream infection (BSI). We assessed the impact of a FQRE screening program on post-TRPB BSIs at an academic medical center. Methods: We implemented a FQRE screening program and targeted TRPB antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines on May 1, 2017 (Fig. 1). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all TRPB and compared the incidence of post-TRPB BSI (within 7 calendar days) per 100 procedures before the intervention (January, 1, 2016, to April 30, 2017) and to the incidence after the intervention (May 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019). We used a subanalysis to compare BSI incidence between patients with positive (+) and negative () FQRE screens and appropriate prophylaxis use, defined as administration of guideline-recommended antibiotics. The Fisher exact test of independence was used to analyze nominal data. Results: The analysis included 2,157 TRPB procedures: 647 in the preintervention period and 1,510 in the postintervention period. FQRE screening compliance was 61% (n = 914) in the postintervention group (Fig. 2); 168 FQRE screens (18%) were positive. The median time from FQRE screen to procedure was 40 days (IQR, 13–69). Postprocedure BSI rates were higher in than those in the preimplementation group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (0.86 vs 0.46; OR, 2.01; P = .42). Among FQRE-screened patients, BSI rates differed significantly between FQRE+ and FQRE patients (2.98 vs 0.54; OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 1.21–28.94; P = .01). Screened patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis had lower BSI rates than those receiving inappropriate prophylaxis; however, this was not statistically significant (1.10 vs 2.02; OR, 0.54; P = .35). The most common BSI pathogen was E. coli (2 (67%) before implementation and 10 (77%) after implementation). Also, 5 E. coli BSIs (50%) were fluoroquinolone resistant in the postimplementation group compared to 1 (33%) in the preimplementation group. Of 13 postimplementation BSIs, 6 occurred in patients who received aminoglycosides perioperatively; however, all 6 BSI pathogens were aminoglycoside sensitive. Conclusions: Compliance with our FQRE screening program and antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol was moderate. Although pre- and postimplementation differences in BSI rates were not statistically significant, the high failure rate among patients receiving aminoglycosides was concerning and led to a change in TRPB prophylaxis guidelines. Reasons for increased BSI risk among FQRE+ patients may include prophylaxis agent, dose, timing, or other confounding factors associated with drug-resistant pathogens. Facilities implementing FQRE screening protocols should evaluate the efficacy of their program and periodically review screening compliance, prophylaxis dosing and timing adherence, and impact on patient-level outcomes.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Background: The standardized infection ratio (SIR) is the nationally adopted metric used to track and compare catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and central-line– associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Despite its widespread use, the SIR may not be suitable for all settings and may not capture all catheter harm. Our objective was to look at the correlation between SIR and device use for CAUTIs and CLABSIs across community hospitals in a regional network. Methods: We compared SIR and SUR (standardized utilization ratio) for CAUTIs and CLABSIs across 43 hospitals in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON) using a scatter plot and calculated an R2 value. Hospitals were stratified into large (>70,000 patient days), medium (30,000–70,000 patient days), and small hospitals (Results: We reviewed 24 small, 11 medium, and 8 large hospitals within DICON. Scatter plots for comparison of SIRs and SURs for CLABSIs and CAUTIs across our network hospitals are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. We detected a weak positive overall correlation between SIR and SUR for CLABSIs (0.33; R2 = 0.11), but no correlation between SIR and SUR for CAUTIs (−0.07; R2 = 0.00). Of 15 hospitals with SUR >1, 7 reported SIR 1 reported SIR Conclusions: Our data reveal a weak positive correlation between SIR and SUR for CLABSIs, suggesting that central line use impacts CLABSI SIR to some extent. However, we detected no correlation between SIR and SUR for CAUTIs in smaller hospitals and a negative correlation for medium and large hospitals. Some hospitals with low CAUTI SIRs might actually have higher device use, and vice versa. Therefore, the SIR alone does not adequately reflect preventable harm related to urinary catheters. Public reporting of SIR may incentivize hospitals to focus more on urine culture stewardship rather than reducing device utilization.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Background Colon surgeries are commonly performed, and surgical site infections (SSIs) following these procedures are routinely reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). However, the impact of infections present at the time of surgery (PATOS) and emergent surgeries on the epidemiology of colon surgery SSIs has not been well described. Methods We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on complex (i.e., deep incisional or organ space) SSIs following colon surgery performed at 34 community hospitals in the southeastern United States from January 2015 to June 2019. We excluded SSIs categorized as PATOS. We then stratified colon surgery SSI rates according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operation duration, diabetes diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, wound class, emergent procedure, endoscopic procedure, and hospital colon surgery volume. Finally, we explored effect measure modification of emergent surgery and open surgery on hospital volume using log-binomial modeling and tests of homogeneity. Results A total of 722 complex SSIs occurred following 28,642 colon surgeries (prevalence rate [PR], 2.52 per 100 procedures). After PATOS SSIs were excluded, 545 complex SSIs remained (PR 1.90 per 100 procedures). Risk factor analysis revealed that age < 75 years and operation time > 75th percentile (188 minutes) during the 5-year study period) significantly increased risk of SSI (Table 1). The most common pathogens that caused SSIs in this study cohort were Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella. (Table 2) 105 (19%) SSIs were culture-negative and 378 (69%) of the SSIs were polymicrobial. We defined hospital volume as high (>500 procedures in the 5-year period) based on the median hospital volume in the dataset. No significant effect measure modification occurred between hospital volume and either laparoscopic surgery or emergent surgery (Table 3). Table 1: Characteristics of patients who underwent colon surgery from January 2015 to June 2018 in 34 community hospitals. Table 2: Count and frequency of pathogens that caused complex surgical site infections after colon surgery Table 3: Colon surgery complex surgical site infection rates, stratified by emergent, elective, open, and laparoscopic procedures and hospital colon surgery volume Conclusion In our cohort, we found that one-fourth of colon surgery SSIs were categorized as PATOS, which are no longer publicly reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. While most SSI literature describes higher volume hospitals having lower SSI rates, high colon surgery volume was associated with increased SSI rates in our community hospital cohort. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures