Search

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of early clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes by comparison of clinical parameters at diagnosis and during follow-up in patients with pediatric type 1 diabetes with early, intermediate, and late diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a population-based analysis, data on 14,292 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes diagnosed between 2015 and 2019 were retrieved from the Diabetes Prospective Documentation (DPV) registry in March 2023. Patients were divided into four groups: one with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis and three with early, intermediate, or late diagnosis based on age-dependent HbA1c terciles. Laboratory-measured HbA1c values and those estimated from continuous glucose monitoring were aggregated as a combined glucose indicator (CGI). Insulin dose–adjusted CGI values <9% were defined as partial remission. RESULTS: At diagnosis, patients had a median age of 9.8 years (IQR 6.8; 13.0). Three years later, patients with early diagnosis had lower CGI than patients with late diagnosis or DKA (mean [95% CI] 7.46% [7.40; 7.53] vs. 7.81% [7.75; 7.87] or 7.74% [7.68; 7.79], respectively; each P < 0.001). More patients experienced partial remission (12.6% [11.0; 14.4] vs. 9.1% [7.7; 10.7] or 8.6% [7.3; 10.0]; each P < 0.001), and 11.7% [10.2; 13.5] of patients with intermediate diagnosis were in partial remission. CONCLUSIONS: Early clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes may be beneficial for metabolic control and remission after 3 years of follow-up. Patients diagnosed early may represent a distinct group with better resources or with a different disease biology and slower β-cell destruction, which needs further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To compare demographic, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics of children with type 1 diabetes age <6 years across three international registries: Diabetes Prospective Follow-Up Registry (DPV; Europe), T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Network (T1DX-QI; U.S.), and Australasian Diabetes Data Network (ADDN; Australasia). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An analysis was conducted comparing 2019–2021 prospective registry data from 8,004 children. RESULTS: Mean ± SD ages at diabetes diagnosis were 3.2 ± 1.4 (DPV and ADDN) and 3.7 ± 1.8 years (T1DX-QI). Mean ± SD diabetes durations were 1.4 ± 1.3 (DPV), 1.4 ± 1.6 (T1DX-QI), and 1.5 ± 1.3 years (ADDN). BMI z scores were in the overweight range in 36.2% (DPV), 41.8% (T1DX-QI), and 50.0% (ADDN) of participants. Mean ± SD HbA1c varied among registries: DPV 7.3 ± 0.9% (56 ± 10 mmol/mol), T1DX-QI 8.0 ± 1.4% (64 ± 16 mmol/mol), and ADDN 7.7 ± 1.2% (61 ± 13 mmol/mol). Overall, 37.5% of children achieved the target HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol): 43.6% in DPV, 25.5% in T1DX-QI, and 27.5% in ADDN. Use of diabetes technologies such as insulin pump (DPV 86.6%, T1DX 46.6%, and ADDN 39.2%) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM; DPV 85.1%, T1DX-QI 57.6%, and ADDN 70.5%) varied among registries. Use of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems was uncommon (from 0.5% [ADDN] to 6.9% [DPV]). CONCLUSIONS: Across three major registries, more than half of children age <6 years did not achieve the target HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol). CGM was used by most participants, whereas insulin pump use varied across registries, and HCL system use was rare. The differences seen in glycemia and use of diabetes technologies among registries require further investigation to determine potential contributing factors and areas to target to improve the care of this vulnerable group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline recommendations for lipid‐lowering therapies among more than 30 000 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a German and Austrian registry from 2020 to 2022. Materials and Methods: Registry data from 2020 and 2021 of 32 170 adult patients (8314 patients with T1D and 23 856 with T2D) were stratified according to the 2019 ESC/EAS risk categories, and guideline‐based low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL‐C) goal attainment was analysed. Results: In patients with T1D (median age 38.35 [20.51‐57.13] years), overall statin use was 19.3%, ezetimibe use was 2.2% and the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors or fibrates was less than 1%. In patients with T2D (median age 68.76 [58.86‐78.39] years), 45.7% received statins, 3.4% received ezetimibe, and fibrates and PCSK9 inhibitors were used by 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Among patients with T1D, 6.16% reached their risk‐based recommended LDL‐C goal of less than 55 mg/dL (very high risk), 10.97% of less than 70 mg/dL (high risk), and 69.50% of less than 100 mg/dL (moderate risk), respectively. In patients with T2D, 11.81% reached their risk‐based goal of LDL‐C less than 55 mg/dL, 16.25% of less than 70 mg/dL, and 51.33% of less than 100 mg/dL. Non‐HDL‐C goals were reached more often, with 15.3%, 25.52% and 91.61% in patients with T1D and 18.56%, 17.96% and 82.30% in patients with T2D for very high, high and moderate risk, respectively. Conclusion: Approximately 2 years after publication of the guidelines, LDL‐C and non‐HDL‐C goal attainment was rarely achieved in patients with T1D and T2D with a high or very high cardiovascular risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We included data on 92 992 people aged >18 years with T1DM (N = 19 061) or T2DM (N = 73 931) and a diabetes duration of >3 months, with visits documented in the years 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2020 to 2021 (pandemic). Keywords: diabetes self-management; HbA1c; obesity; pandemic; remote diabetes care EN diabetes self-management HbA1c obesity pandemic remote diabetes care 2774 2779 6 08/03/23 20230901 NES 230901 INTRODUCTION Since the first case was described in 2019, COVID-19 has become a pandemic with waves of varying activity. In our study, people with T1DM and T2DM reduced their PA during the pandemic, while only people living with T1DM recovered this at the end of 2021, reaching pre-pandemic PA levels. Surfing the waves of the COVID-19 pandemic with diabetes mellitus: Analysis of changes in the diabetes therapy, metabolism and physical activity of 92 992 people living with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from the German DPV registry. [Extracted from the article]