Search

Objectives This study reports on the performance of a leadless ventricular pacemaker with automated, enhanced accelerometer-based algorithms that provide atrioventricular (AV) synchronous ...

INTRODUCTION: MARVEL 2 assessed the efficacy of mechanical atrial sensing by a ventricular leadless pacemaker, enabling a VDD pacing mode. The behavior of the enhanced MARVEL 2 algorithm during variable atrio-ventricular conduction (AVC) and/or arrhythmias has not been characterized and is the focus of this study. METHODS: Of the 75 patients enrolled in the MARVEL 2 study, 73 had a rhythm assessment and were included in the analysis. The enhanced MARVEL 2 algorithm included a mode-switching algorithm that automatically switches between VDD and ventricular only antibradycardia pacing (VVI)-40 depending upon AVC status. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (58%) had persistent third degree AV block (AVB), 18 (25%) had 1:1 AVC, 5 (7%) had variable AVC status, and 8 (11%) had atrial arrhythmias. Among the 42 patients with persistent third degree AVB, the median ventricular pacing (VP) percentage was 99.9% compared to 0.2% among those with 1:1 AVC. As AVC status changed, the algorithm switched to VDD when the ventricular rate dropped less than 40 bpm. During atrial fibrillation (AF) with ventricular response greater than 40 bpm, VVI-40 mode was maintained. No pauses longer than 1500 ms were observed. Frequent ventricular premature beats reduced the percentage of AV synchrony. During AF, the atrial signal was of low amplitude and there was infrequent sensing. CONCLUSION: The mode switching algorithm reduced VP in patients with 1:1 AVC and appropriately switched to VDD during AV block. No pacing safety issues were observed during arrhythmias. ispartof: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY vol:32 issue:7 pages:1947-1957 ispartof: location:United States status: published

BACKGROUND: The MARVEL (Micra Atrial TRacking Using a Ventricular AccELerometer) 2 study assessed the efficacy of atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with a Micra leadless pacemaker. Average atrioventricular synchrony (AVS) was 89.2%. Previously, low amplitude of the Micra-sensed atrial signal (A4) was observed to be a factor of low AVS. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of A4 amplitude and high AVS. METHODS: We analyzed 64 patients enrolled in MARVEL 2 who had visible P waves on electrocardiogram for assessing A4 amplitude and 40 patients with third-degree AV block for assessing AVS at rest. High AVS was defined as >90% correct atrial-triggered ventricular pacing. The association between clinical factors and echocardiographic parameters with A4 amplitude was investigated using a multivariable model with lasso variable selection. Variables associated with A4 amplitude together with premature ventricular contraction burden, sinus rate, and sinus rate variability (standard deviation of successive differences of P-P intervals [SDSD]) were assessed for association with AVS. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, low A4 amplitude was inversely related to atrial function assessed by E/A ratio and e'/a' ratio, and was directly related to atrial contraction excursion (ACE) and atrial strain (Ɛa) on echocardiography (all P ≤.05). The multivariable lasso regression model found coronary artery bypass graft history, E/A ratio, ACE, and Ɛa were associated with low A4 amplitude. E/A ratio and SDSD were multivariable predictors of high AVS, with >90% probability if E/A

Introduction The Micra Transcatheter Pacing System provides a rate adaptive pacing using an individually programmable three-axis accelerometer. We evaluated the short- and mid-term performance of the Micra activity sensor by testing all three available activity vectors during the exercise tests. Methods and results Implantation and follow-up data were prospectively collected from the patients undergoing Micra implantation at our institution. Patients underwent a 5-minute exercise test for each vector at predischarge (initial testing) and at scheduled in-office visits (repeat testing). On the basis of measurements of activity counts during the test, vectors were categorized to be adequate (excellent or acceptable) or poor. A total of 278 tests with 818 vector measurements were analyzed in 51 patients during follow-up (median duration was 18 months). Initial testing revealed the adequate quality of the nominal Vector 1 in 74.5% of the patients. Upon repeated testing at subsequent in-office visits, Vectors 1 and 3 were comparable (adequate quality in 64.7% vs 68.6% of the patients; P = 0.65) but better compared with Vector 2 (51.0%; P = 0.10 vs Vector 1, P = 0.01 vs Vector 3). In a subgroup of 45 patients programmed to VVIR mode, Vector 1 was selected in 46.7% of the patients after the initial test (Vector 2, 8.9%; Vector 3, 44.4%). Vector change was performed in 10 patients (22.2%) following repeated tests within 3 months of postimplantation. Conclusion The three-axis accelerometer-based rate adaptive pacing feature proved to be feasible after manual selection of an adequate activity vector. Vector testing in Micra patients with chronotropic incompetence appears to be beneficial compared with the use of nominal Vector 1.

Background: The 12-lead ECG is considered the gold standard to differentiate between selective (S), nonselective (NS) His bundle pacing (HBP), and right ventricular septal capture in routine clinical practice. We sought to assess the utility of device EGM recordings as a tool to identify the type of HBP morphology. Methods: One hundred forty-eight consecutive patients underwent HBP with a 3830 Select Secure lead (Medtronic, Inc) at 3 centers between October 2016 and October 2017. The near field V-EGM morphology (NF EGM), near field V-EGM time to peak (NF Time to peak ), and far-field EGM QRS duration (QRSd) were recorded while pacing the His lead with simultaneous 12-lead ECG rhythm strips. Results: Indications for HBP were sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular conduction disease, and cardiac resynchronization therapy in 68 (46%), 56 (38%), and 24 (16%) patients, respectively. Baseline QRSd was 108±38 ms with QRSd >120 ms in 57 (39%) patients (27 right bundle branch block, 18 left bundle branch block, and 12 intraventricular conduction delay). S-HBP was noted in 54 (36%) patients. A positive NF EGM and NF Time to peak >40 ms were highly sensitive (94% and 93%, respectively) and specific (90% and 94%) for S-HBP irrespective of baseline QRSd. All 3 parameters (+NF EGM , NF Time to peak >40 ms, and far-field EGM QRSd Conclusions: We propose a novel and simple criteria for accurate differentiation between S-HBP, NS-HBP, and right ventricular septal capture morphologies by careful analysis of device EGMs alone. This study paves the way for future studies to assess autocapture algorithms for devices with HBP.

Key Teaching Points • Current pacing guidelines recognize VDD pacing systems as an alternative to DDD pacemakers among patients with high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. • The Micra Atrial TRacking Using a Ventricular AccELerometer (MARVEL) study has recently shown that an AV synchronous pacing mode is feasible using a single-chamber ventricular leadless pacemaker. • We present a first-in-human description of an episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in an “AV synchronous ventricular leadless pacemaker.”

Introduction The MARVEL study demonstrated at a single time point that accelerometer (ACC)-based atrial sensing improves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony (AVS) in patients with AV block and a Micra pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The purpose of the MARVEL Evolve substudy was to assess the performance over time. Methods This prospective single-center study compared AVS and ACC signals at two visits ≥6 months apart. Custom software was temporarily downloaded into the Micra at each visit and AVS was measured during 30 min at rest. Results Nine patients from the MARVEL study were enrolled. The mean (±standard deviation) age was 82.3 ± 6.0 years old, 67% were male, and a Micra was implanted for 6.0 ± 6.4 months. High-degree AV block was present in four patients, whereas five with predominantly intrinsic conduction required intermittent pacing for bradycardia. The mean interval between visits was 7.1 ± 0.6 months. Seven patients had normal sinus node function at both visits and were included in a paired analysis. Both ACC signal amplitude (visit 2-visit 1 = 1.4 mG; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-25.8 to 28.4 mG]; P = 0.933) and AVS (visit 1: 90.8%, 95% CI [72.4, 97.4] and visit 2: 91.4%, 95% CI [63.8, 98.5]; P = 0.740) remained stable. Three patients had spontaneous atrial tachycardia. During atrial fibrillation, no atrial contraction was detected or tracked. During atrial flutter, intermittent tracking resulted in a ventricular rate of 60 ± 8 beats per minute (bpm); there was no ventricular pacing >100 bpm. Conclusion ACC signals amplitude and performance of AVS pacing were stable over time. During atrial arrhythmias, the AV synchronous pacing mode behaved safely.

BACKGROUND: Micra is a leadless pacemaker that is implanted in the right ventricle and provides rate response via a 3-axis accelerometer (ACC). Custom software was developed to detect atrial contraction using the ACC enabling atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to sense atrial contractions from the Micra ACC signal and provide AV synchronous pacing. METHODS: The Micra Accelerometer Sensor Sub-Study (MASS) and MASS2 early feasibility studies showed intracardiac accelerations related to atrial contraction can be measured via ACC in the Micra leadless pacemaker. The Micra Atrial TRacking Using A Ventricular AccELerometer (MARVEL) study was a prospective multicenter study designed to characterize the closed-loop performance of an AV synchronous algorithm downloaded into previously implanted Micra devices. Atrioventricular synchrony (AVS) was measured during 30 minutes of rest and during VVI pacing. AVS was defined as a P wave visible on surface ECG followed by a ventricular event

Background The Micra transcatheter pacemaker was designed to have similar functionality to conventional transvenous VVIR pacing systems. It provides rate adaptive pacing using a programmable 3-axis accelerometer designed to detect patient activity in the presence of cardiac motion. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the system's performance during treadmill tests to maximum exertion in a subset of patients within the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study. Methods Patients underwent treadmill testing at 3 or 6 months postimplant with algorithm programming at physician discretion. Normalized sensor rate (SenR) relative to the programmed upper sensor rate was modeled as a function of normalized workload in metabolic equivalents (METS) relative to maximum METS achieved during the test. A normalized METS and SenR were determined at the end of each 1-minute treadmill stage. The proportionality of SenR to workload was evaluated by comparing the slope from this relationship to the prospectively defined tolerance margin (0.65–1.35). Results A total of 69 treadmill tests were attempted by 42 patients at 3 and 6 months postimplant. Thirty tests from 20 patients who completed ≥4 stages with an average slope of 0.86 (90% confidence interval 0.77–0.96) confirmed proportionality to workload. On an individual test basis, 25 of 30 point estimates (83.3%) had a normalized slope within the defined tolerance range (range 0.46–1.08). Conclusion Accelerometer-based rate adaptive pacing was proportional to workload, thus confirming rate adaptive pacing commensurate to workload is achievable with an entirely intracardiac pacing system.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to characterize interactions between normal pacing system operation and the initiating sequence of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF). Background Abrupt changes in ventricular cycle lengths (short-long-short, S-L-S) might initiate VT/VF. The S-L-S sequences might be passively permitted or actively facilitated by bradycardia pacing. Methods Initiating sequences of 1,356 VT/VF episodes in the PainFree Rx II (n = 634) and EnTrust Trial (n = 421) were analyzed with stored electrograms and by pacing mode (DDD/R, VVI/R, and Managed Ventricular Pacing [MVP]). Interactions between pacing and VT/VF initiation were classified as: non-pacing associated, pacing associated, pacing permitted, and pacing facilitated. Results Non-pacing associated (no pacing, no S-L-S) and pacing associated (ventricular pacing without S-L-S) onset accounted for 44.0% and 29.8% of all VT/VF, respectively. Pacing permitted (S-L-S sequences without ventricular pacing) episodes accounted for 6.4% (DDD/R), 20.0% (MVP), and 25.6% (VVI/R) of 1,356 VT/VF episodes. Pacing facilitated onset (S-L-S sequences actively facilitated by ventricular pacing including the terminal beat after a pause) accounted for 8.2% (MVP), 9.4% (VVI/R), and 14.8% (DDD/R) of 1,356 VT/VF episodes. Pacing facilitated S-L-S VT/VF occurred in 2.6% (MVP), 3.3% (VVI/R), and 5.2% (DDD/R) of patients with episodes and was the sole initiating sequence in approximately 1% of patients. Pause durations during pacing facilitated S-L-S differed between modes (DDD/R 793 ± 172 ms vs. MVP 865 ± 278 ms vs. VVI/R 1180 ± 414 ms, p = 0.002). The majority of these episodes were monomorphic VT. Conclusions Ventricular tachycardia/VF in some implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients might be initiated by S-L-S sequences that are actively facilitated by bradycardia pacing operation and might constitute an important mechanism of ventricular proarrhythmia.

Aims Permanent cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for symptomatic bradycardia, but complications associated with conventional transvenous pacing systems are commonly related to the pacing lead and pocket. We describe the early performance of a novel self-contained miniaturized pacemaker. Methods and results Patients having Class I or II indication for VVI pacing underwent implantation of a Micra transcatheter pacing system, from the femoral vein and fixated in the right ventricle using four protractible nitinol tines. Prespecified objectives were >85% freedom from unanticipated serious adverse device events (safety) and

Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Safety and Efficacy Study of a New Atrial-Based Managed Ventricular. Background: Ventricular desynchronization caused by right ventricular pacing may impair ventricular function and increase risk of heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and death. Conventional DDD/R mode often results in high cumulative percentage ventricular pacing (Cum%VP). We hypothesized that a new managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) would safely provide AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and DDD/R during AV block (AVB) and reduce Cum%VP compared to DDD/R. Methods: MVP RAMware was downloaded in 181 patients with Marquis DR ICDs. Patients were initially randomized to either MVP or DDD/R for 1 month, then crossed over to the opposite mode for 1 month. ICD diagnostics were analyzed for cumulative percentage atrial pacing (Cum%AP), Cum%VP, and duration of DDD/R pacing for spontaneous AVB. Results: Baseline characteristics included age 66 ′ 12 years, EF 36 ′ 14%, and NYHA Class II-III 36%. Baseline PR interval was 190 ′ 53 msec and programmed AV intervals (DDD/R) were 216 ′ 50 (paced)/189 ′ 53 (sensed) msec. Mean Cum%VP was significantly lower in MVP versus DDD/R (4.1 ′ 16.3 vs 73.8 ′ 32.5, P < 0.0001). The median absolute and relative reductions in Cum%VP during MVP were 85.0 and 99.9, respectively. Mean Cum%AP was not different between MVP versus DDD/R (48.7 ′ 38.5 vs 47.3 ′ 38.4, P = 0.83). During MVP overall time spent in AAI/R was 89.6% (intrinsic conduction), DDD/R 6.7% (intermittent AVB), and DDI/R 3.7% (AF). No adverse events were attributed to MVP. Conclusions: MVP safely achieves functional atrial pacing by limiting ventricular pacing to periods of intermittent AVB and AF in ICD patients, significantly reducing Cum%VP compared to DDD/R. MVP is a universal pacing mode that adapts to AVB and AF, providing both atrial pacing and ventricular pacing support when needed.

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) typically is attempted with biventricular pacing (BiVP). One-third of patients are nonresponders. His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been evaluated as an alternative means of effecting CRT because it generates truly physiologic ventricular activation, as evidenced in part by the morphologic identity between normally conducted and paced QRS complexes. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of, and clinical response to, permanent HBP as an alternative to BiVP in CRT-indicated patients. Methods Patients were implanted with a right atrial pacing lead, defibrillation lead, left ventricular (LV) lead via the coronary sinus, and HBP lead. His and LV leads were plugged into the LV port via a Y-adapter. After successful implant, patients were randomized in single patient-blinded fashion to either HBP or BiVP. After 6 months, patients were crossed over to the other pacing modality and followed for another 6 months. Quality-of-life assessments, echocardiographic measurements, New York Heart Association classification, and 6-minute hall walk test were obtained at baseline and at each 6-month follow-up. Results Twenty-nine patients were enrolled; 21 (72%) demonstrated electrical resynchronization (QRS narrowing) at implant. Twelve patients completed the crossover analysis at 1 year. Clinical outcomes (quality of life, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute hall walk test, LV ejection fraction) were significantly improved for both pacing modes compared with baseline measures. Conclusion In this crossover comparison between HBP and BiVP, HBP was found to effect an equivalent CRT response. QRS narrowing was observed in 21 of 29 patients, suggesting this approach may be feasible in more patients with left bundle branch block than previously assumed.

Background:Patients routinely undergo Holter monitor evaluation for the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. Documentation of daily patient activities is a common shortcoming. Discriminating physiological from pathological heart rate, e.g., sinus tachycardia in response to exercise from supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, can be difficult without an accurate diary. Independent documentation of body activity may help solve this inadequacy. Accelerometer-based pacing systems have established the utility of general body activity detection for pacemaker rate determination. Methods:An accelerometer sensor was positioned in the left pectoral region in 10 volunteers for measurement of normal daily subject activity. Additionally, the volunteers were asked to keep a detailed diary of daily activities. The accelerometer sensor signal was recorded on one channel of a modified Holter monitor system. The Holter FCG and accelerometer data were analyzed and compared to the detailed diary. The study was then repeated in 10 patients undergoing standard Holter monitor evaluation. Results:In all 20 subjects, reviewing the 24-hour profiles allowed correlation of heart rate response to activities such as walking, resting, exercise, or sleep and the accelerometer sensor signal. In the patients, a total of 170 minutes of increased heart rate correlated with documented physical activity, while 14 minutes did not. Additionally, 161 minutes of bradycardia during physical activity were also identified. Conclusion:Present-day Holter systems can detect bradycardias and tachycardias based on ECG characteristics and rate criteria. The addition of acceterometer signal to standard Holter ECG might improve physician interpretation of patient heart rate response to daily patient activities. A.N.E. 2000;5(1):73–78

The effect of atrial pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Furthermore, the threshold of ventricular pacing that is associated with a higher incidence of AF has yet to be determined. Thus, we set out to determine the optimal pacing modality in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) for the prevention of AF.Individual patient data from four contemporary pacemaker studies were gathered and analyzed. Since AF would inherently lead to a reduction in atrial pacing, percent atrial and ventricular pacing (%AP and %VP) were determined at the first follow-up visit and then used as a surrogate for all endpoints. Patients with5 minutes of AF at the first visit were excluded. The primary endpoint was defined as 7 consecutive days of AF.A total of 1,507 patients were included. During a mean follow-up of 14.3 ± 8.7 months, 77 patients developed AF (annual rate of 4.3%). The incidence of AF in the first (0-32%), second (32-66%), third (66-89%), and fourth (89-100%) quartiles of %AP was 1.3%, 5.3%, 5.8%, and 8.0%, respectively (P0.001). A multivariable analysis found that pacing above the first quartile was associated with a relative risk of 2.93 (95% confidence interval 1.16-7.39, P = 0.023). The grouping of %VP into first (0-2%), second (2-7%), third (7-84%), and fourth (84-100%) quartiles yielded an AF incidence of 2.4%, 3.4%, 6.6%, and 8.0%, respectively (P = 0.001).We demonstrated that in patients with SND both atrial and ventricular pacing are associated with a higher incidence of AF.

The CAPTURE study evaluated the accuracy of automated atrial and right ventricular (RV) threshold algorithms.Modern pacemakers include many added features designed to improve the ease of patient follow-up, as well as algorithms to reduce pacing outputs and/or reduce the atrial or ventricular pacing percentages, thus improving longevity.Automated atrial and RV threshold measurements were assessed versus manual measurements at 6 months. The projected longevity was assessed and compared between subjects with the threshold-tracking feature On versus Off. In addition, the projected longevity effect of device features to reduce atrial pacing and reduce ventricular pacing, and device characteristics such as battery size and high impedance leads (or =1,000 ohms), was investigated.Atrial and RV manual versus automatic measurements were equivalent in 683 of 691 subjects (98.8%) and 736 of 746 subjects (98.7%), respectively. Thresholds were stable with 99.6% of atrial and 99.2% of RV consecutive measurements within +/-0.25V. Algorithms for threshold tracking, reducing ventricular pacing, and reducing atrial pacing were associated with 0.8, 0.9, and 0.2 years projected longevity improvements. High impedance leads were associated with a 0.8-year projected longevity improvement. Approximately 2 years of longevity improvement was projected for a 1-cc increase in device size.The atrial and RV algorithms were accurate and reliable in all leads tested. Threshold tracking, reduced ventricular pacing, and high impedance leads result in increased device longevity. Battery capacity was the strongest determinant of increased projected longevity.

Objectives: The CAPTURE study evaluated the accuracy of automated atrial and right ventricular (RV) threshold algorithms. Background: Modern pacemakers include many added features designed to improve the ease of patient follow-up, as well as algorithms to reduce pacing outputs and/or reduce the atrial or ventricular pacing percentages, thus improving longevity. Methods: Automated atrial and RV threshold measurements were assessed versus manual measurements at 6 months. The projected longevity was assessed and compared between subjects with the threshold-tracking feature On versus Off. In addition, the projected longevity effect of device features to reduce atrial pacing and reduce ventricular pacing, and device characteristics such as battery size and high impedance leads (≥1,000 ohms), was investigated. Results: Atrial and RV manual versus automatic measurements were equivalent in 683 of 691 subjects (98.8%) and 736 of 746 subjects (98.7%), respectively. Thresholds were stable with 99.6% of atrial and 99.2% of RV consecutive measurements within ±0.25V. Algorithms for threshold tracking, reducing ventricular pacing, and reducing atrial pacing were associated with 0.8, 0.9, and 0.2 years projected longevity improvements. High impedance leads were associated with a 0.8-year projected longevity improvement. Approximately 2 years of longevity improvement was projected for a 1-cc increase in device size. Conclusions: The atrial and RV algorithms were accurate and reliable in all leads tested. Threshold tracking, reduced ventricular pacing, and high impedance leads result in increased device longevity. Battery capacity was the strongest determinant of increased projected longevity. (PACE 2010; 33:1020–1030)

The first heart sound is generated by vibrations from the myocardium during isovolumic contraction. Peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) has been used previously to measure these vibrations in humans and correlates with myocardial contractility during inotropic interventions. It is unknown if changes in PEA can be used to characterize a reduction in contractility during ischemic episodes. This study was designed to evaluate the use of an endocardial accelerometer for the detection of acute myocardial ischemia. Thirteen patients undergoing routine percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) consented to having a single-axis, lead-based accelerometer positioned in the right ventricular apex. PEA was defined as the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude during a window 50 ms before to 200 ms following the peak R wave. Time of endocardial acceleration (TEA) was defined as the time from the peak R wave to the maximum accelerometer signal within this window. To obtain a more robust estimate of the strength of vibrations, a 100-beat template of the accelerometer signal was constructed at baseline and applied as a matched filter during ischemia. The peak magnitude of the filtered endocardial accelerometer signal (Max Filtered EA) was used as an index of signal intensity. Median baseline PEA, TEA, and Max Filtered EA were 0.91 ± 0.35 g, 75.2 ± 16.2 ms, and 0.40 ± 0.20 g, respectively. PEA and Max Filtered EA significantly decreased by 7% during ischemia (0.91 to 0.85 g and 0.40 to 0.37 g, both P < 0.05, respectively). TEA did not significantly change from baseline (77.0 ms, P = ns). The results of this study suggest that acute ischemia can be detected with an endocardial accelerometer in humans. (PACE 2004; 27:621–625)

Objective We hypothesized that a new minimal ventricular pacing mode (MVP) that provides AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and back-up DDD/R pacing as needed during AV block (AVB) would significantly reduce cumulative percent ventricular pacing compared to DDD/R. Background Conventional DDD/R mode often results in high cumulative percent ventricular pacing that may adversely affect ventricular function and increase risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Methods MVP was made operational in 30 patients with DDD/R implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and no history of AVB. Patients were randomized to one week each in DDD/R and MVP. Holter monitor recordings (ECG, intracardiac electrograms, and event markers) and device diagnostics were analyzed for cumulative % atrial paced (Cum%AP), cumulative percent ventricular pacing, and frequency and duration of DDD/R pacing back-up. Diaries were used to report symptoms. Results Age of the study population was 61 years ± 12 years and 83% were male. Baseline PR interval was 204 ms ± 32 ms and programmed AV intervals (DDD/R) were 200 ms ± 50 ms (paced)/167 ms ± 54 ms (sensed). Cum%AP was similar between MVP and DDD/R (47.9 ± 37 vs 46.3 ± 36). Cumulative percent ventricular pacing was significantly lower in MVP vs DDD/R (3.79 ± 16.3 vs 80.6 ± 33.8, P Back-up DDD/R pacing during MVP operation due to transient AVB occurred in 10% of patients (9.3 ± 7.4 [range 1–15] episodes/patient-day, duration 39.7 minutes ± 156 minutes). Fifteen percent of AV intervals during MVP operation exceeded 300 ms. No significant symptoms were reported during MVP operation. Conclusions MVP dramatically reduced cumulative percent ventricular pacing compared to DDD/R while maintaining AV synchrony and providing sensor-modulated atrial pacing support. Intermittent oscillations between MVP and DDD/R during transient AV block appeared safe and well tolerated.

This prospective study characterized performance of the Kappa 700 Ventricular Capture Management trade mark (VCM) system for monitoring ventricular pacing threshold and adapting outputs in both endocardial and unipolar epicardial pacing systems in children and young adults. VCM bears cautionary labelling against use with epicardial leads since they have not been demonstrated appropriate for use with VCM.VCM was programmed in "Monitor Only" mode. Ventricular pacemaker thresholds were measured daily using VCM for a minimum of 2 months. Potential device longevities at nominal outputs (3.5 V, 1.0 ms) and at VCM-recommended outputs were compared. Thirty patients (median age 14.4 years (1-27 years); 15 epicardial/15 endocardial) completed the study. During the daily measurements, consistent undersensed evoked response occurred in 2 patients (Medtronic epicardial leads 4965). For the other 28 patients, programming VCM in "Adaptive" mode from implant would provide an additional 6.8 months (0-19 months) of battery life.Although not an IDE (Investigation Device Exemption) study, this study showed acceptable VCM performance in "Monitor Only" mode in 13/15 patients with unipolar epicardial leads. A 2-month "Monitor Only" observation period helps screen patients who might not benefit from VCM. VCM may provide substantial energy savings and extended battery life for children and young adults.