Search

Patients with advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF IIB–IVB) and Sézary syndrome (SS) have poor prognoses, with survival ranging from 4.7 to 1.4 years depending on the disease stage. There is a need for therapeutic approaches that lead to long-lasting responses and improved quality of life and survival. Mogamulizumab, a humanized antibody against the CCR4 molecule, and low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) are two known established treatments for MF and SS as a monotherapy. However, little is known about the potential additive effect on the combination of both treatments. We report here for the first time the concurrent use of low-dose hypofractionated TSEBT (2 × 4 Gy) with mogamulizumab. Based on two relapsed/refractory and advanced-stage CTCL patients, we show that this combination may be well tolerated in advanced-stage MF or SS and may potentially lead to an additive treatment effect on response times, particularly in the skin and blood within two weeks. We propose that this combination may be a treatment option for patients with SS. Further research is needed to understand the efficacy and tolerability profile of this therapeutic combination and to determine if there is an additive effect of the combination on the response rates when compared with the monotherapy.

Patients with advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF IIB–IVB) and Sézary syndrome (SS) have poor prognoses, with survival ranging from 4.7 to 1.4 years depending on the disease stage. There is a need for therapeutic approaches that lead to long-lasting responses and improved quality of life and survival. Mogamulizumab, a humanized antibody against the CCR4 molecule, and low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) are two known established treatments for MF and SS as a monotherapy. However, little is known about the potential additive effect on the combination of both treatments. We report here for the first time the concurrent use of low-dose hypofractionated TSEBT (2 × 4 Gy) with mogamulizumab. Based on two relapsed/refractory and advanced-stage CTCL patients, we show that this combination may be well tolerated in advanced-stage MF or SS and may potentially lead to an additive treatment effect on response times, particularly in the skin and blood within two weeks. We propose that this combination may be a treatment option for patients with SS. Further research is needed to understand the efficacy and tolerability profile of this therapeutic combination and to determine if there is an additive effect of the combination on the response rates when compared with the monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is effective for patients with refractory or diffuse skin involvement of cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL). A common concern for patients undergoing TSEBT is the development of alopecia. Patients are already burdened with the physical symptoms associated with their disease; therefore, mitigating additional physical side effects of treatment, including cosmetic concerns, is important. As such, the purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel technique to prevent alopecia after TSEBT. Prior scalp sparing techniques have relied largely on materials found in the radiation department (e.g., lead, Superflab bolus), but in this report, we utilized a custom blue wax polyethylene material to create a custom scalp-sparing, dose attenuating, helmet. The priorities that lead to investigating this solution included patient comfort, full scalp protection, and practicality. We wanted to find a light weight, snug fitting, helmet to protect the entire hair line, that could be easily fabricated for any patient. In the end, we found success in our efforts to minimize radiation to the scalp for indistinguishable hair volume changes.

Purpose: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is used mostly in the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. In this study we describe the results of TSEBT applied in the Netherlands using two different schedules, a conventional dose schedule of 35 Gy and a low-dose schedule of 12 Gy. We aimed to evaluate the treatment results in and compare treatment outcomes between the two treatment groups and to further define indications for both doses. Methods: In the LUMC, Leiden, we performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with TSEBT between January 2008 and December 2018, with follow-up untill December 2019. Thirty one patients were treated with 35 Gy and twenty with 12 Gy. The dose was chosen based on the severity of skin involvement. Outcome measures were time to meaningful progression, survival, response rate and toxicity. Results: Time to meaningful progression was 5.1 months with no significant differences between dose groups (P = 0.77). Overall survival was 27.4 months. Both time to progression and survival were significantly better for T2 vs T3 stage. Overall response rate was 80.4 %. Both dose groups showed improvement of symptoms. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: Both high-dose and low-dose TSEBT offer similar results for TMP and OS. It remains unclear which patients benefit most from a high-dose schedule. We propose to use the low-dose schedule as a standard for TSEBT and use supplementary boosts or escalation to high-dose treatment for patients unresponsive to the low-dose schedule.

Background and Purpose: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an important skin-directed radiotherapeutic procedure done in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, namely, mycosis fungoides (MF). This procedure is usually done at larger source-to-surface distances with the patient standing on a rotatory platform. As the patient has to stand in different positions without any rigid immobilization devices, there are chances that the total skin may not get uniformly irradiated which could lead to nonuniform dose distributions. Therefore, all the necessary arrangements should be made to evaluate the dose for different regions of the skin using suitable in vivo dosimeters at the radiotherapy centers offering these treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency between the delivered and planned doses in vivo during TSEBT using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry. Materials and Methods: The surface dose for the six MF patients treated for TSEBT at our hospital from 2018 to 2022 was measured and evaluated. 2 cm × 2 cm Gafchromic® EBT3 films were used to measure skin dose at reference body positions of clinical interest. All the patients were treated with the modified Stanford technique. The irradiated film strips were analyzed for the dose using the IMRT OmniPro software. The doses at respective positions were expressed as mean dose ± standard deviation and the deviation was calculated as the percentage of the prescribed dose. Results: One hundred and fifty-four Gafchromic® EBT3 film strips irradiated on six TSEBT patients showed a maximum dose variation of 2.00 ± 0.14 Gy, in the central body regions. The dose variation in the peripheral areas such as hands and ears was larger. A variation of 2 ± 0.32 Gy was observed on the hands and ears. The uniformity of the dose delivered to maximum body parts was within −7% and +16% for the peripheral areas like hands. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine recommends a dose uniformity of 8% and 4% in the vertical and horizontal patient plane for direct incident beam; however, for oblique incidences like in the modified Stanford technique, the dose variation is about 15%. Conclusion: In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry for TSEBT yields objective data to find the under or overdose regions. That can be useful to provide quality treatment, especially when treatments tend to be as complex as TSEBT.

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is one of the mainstays of treatment for mycosis fungoides. The most common modalities are standard dose (30–36 Gy) and low dose (10–12 Gy). To review the literature on the efficacy and safety profiles of standard dose and low dose TSEBT. We searched electronic databases for studies that enrolled patients with Mycosis Fungoides and treated with TSEBT. We estimated the event rates associated with low dose and standard dose TSEBT. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses reporting guideline was followed. Main outcomes were complete response rate, partial response rate, mild and severe adverse events rate low dose TSEBT had a Complete Response Rate of 28% [0.19, 0.37], an Overall Response Rate of 85% [0.76, 0.93], a mild adverse events rate of 93% [0.82, 1.04] and a severe adverse events rate of 5% [−0.04; 0.14] Standard dose TSEBT had a Complete Response Rate of 57% [0.41; 0.73], the Overall Response Rate was 99% [0.97; 1.02], the mild adverse events rate was 100%, the severe adverse events rate was 7% [−0.01; 0.16]. Comparing standard dose TSEBT in the early versus advanced stages, advanced stages patients had a Risk Ratio = 0.77 in obtaining a Complete Response [0.64, 0.92](p = 0.0158). TSEBT is an associated with an excellent short term safety profile. Both schedules show high ORR, with standard dose TSEBT demonstrating highest CRR. Advanced stage of disease negatively influence the CRR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an important skin‑directed radiotherapeutic procedure done in the treatment of cutaneous T‑cell lymphomas, namely, mycosis fungoides (MF). This procedure is usually done at larger source‑to‑surface distances with the patient standing on a rotatory platform. As the patient has to stand in different positions without any rigid immobilization devices, there are chances that the total skin may not get uniformly irradiated which could lead to nonuniform dose distributions. Therefore, all the necessary arrangements should be made to evaluate the dose for different regions of the skin using suitable in vivo dosimeters at the radiotherapy centers offering these treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency between the delivered and planned doses in vivo during TSEBT using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry. Materials and Methods: The surface dose for the six MF patients treated for TSEBT at our hospital from 2018 to 2022 was measured and evaluated. 2 cm × 2 cm Gafchromic® EBT3 films were used to measure skin dose at reference body positions of clinical interest. All the patients were treated with the modified Stanford technique. The irradiated film strips were analyzed for the dose using the IMRT OmniPro software. The doses at respective positions were expressed as mean dose ± standard deviation and the deviation was calculated as the percentage of the prescribed dose. Results: One hundred and fifty‑four Gafchromic® EBT3 film strips irradiated on six TSEBT patients showed a maximum dose variation of 2.00 ± 0.14 Gy, in the central body regions. The dose variation in the peripheral areas such as hands and ears was larger. A variation of 2 ± 0.32 Gy was observed on the hands and ears. The uniformity of the dose delivered to maximum body parts was within −7% and +16% for the peripheral areas like hands. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine recommends a dose uniformity of 8% and 4% in the vertical and horizontal patient plane for direct incident beam; however, for oblique incidences like in the modified Stanford technique, the dose variation is about 15%. Conclusion: In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry for TSEBT yields objective data to find the under or overdose regions. That can be useful to provide quality treatment, especially when treatments tend to be as complex as TSEBT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimal doses of total skin electron beam therapy for mycosis fungoides remain to be established. Clinical efficiency and adverse effects of middle-dose (25 Gy) vs. low-dose (10–12 Gy) total skin electron beam therapy were retrospectively compared in a series of 14 and 12 mycosis fungoides, respectively. Overall skin response rate was 96.2% (92.9% middle-dose and 100% low-dose; not significant (NS)). Overall complete and partial skin response rates were 57.7% (42.9% middle-dose and 75% low-dose; NS) and 38.5% (50% middle-dose and 25% low-dose; NS), respectively. All responding patients relapsed after an overall median time of 5 months (7 months middle-dose vs. 4 months low-dose; p = 0.164, NS). Tolerance was equally fair in both groups, with only grade 1 and 2 adverse events observed in 100% vs. 66.7% of patients in middle-dose and low-dose groups (NS). Although no significant difference was observed, middle-dose protocol may be recommended owing to a longer relapse-free survival for a similar tolerance.

Abstract Background Helical irradiation of the total skin (HITS) was modified as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-helical arc radiotherapy of total skin (HEARTS) technique and applied to an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient with disseminated leukemia cutis. Methods The original HITS plan was revised for different regimens, i.e. HEARTS, low-dose HEARTS and SIB-HEARTS. The uniformity index (UI), conformity index (CI), and dose of organs at risk (OARs) were used to evaluate the plans. Additionally, the SIB-HEART (21/15 Gy) was delivered to the total skin and chloromas. Results No significant differences were observed for the CI and UI between HITS and HEARTS regimens. Compared with HITS, the reduced mean doses to various bone marrows ranged from 17 to 88%. The mean OARs doses for the head, chest and abdomen of a patient with AML treated with SIB-HEARTS (21/15 Gy) were 2.1 to 21.9 Gy, 1.8 to 7.8 Gy and 1.7 to 3.3 Gy, respectively. No severe adverse effects were noted except for grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion HEARTS and different regimens reduced the dose to OARs and bone marrow while maintaining the uniformity and conformity. SIB-HEARTS deliveries different doses to the total skin and enlarged tumors simultaneously. Trial registration Retrospectively registered and approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (FEMH-106151-C).

Abstract Background Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an effective treatment in mycosis fungoides. Total skin helical tomotherapy (TSHT) may be an alternative to TSEBT and may offer several dosimetric and treatment advantages. There are currently very few published treatment results using TSHT in place of TSEBT for treatment of mycosis fungoides. Case presentation Two patients with mycosis fungoides were treated at our institution using TSHT. The first patient was a 69-year-old Caucasian female with stage IVA2 (T2 N3 M0 B2) disease who was treated to a dose of 12 Gy in 8 fractions, with a bone marrow mean dose of 1.66 Gy and V10 = 0.41%. Two weeks after ending treatment the patient developed myelosuppression including grade 4 thrombocytopenia and required blood and platelet transfusions. The second patient was a 29-year-old Caucasian female with stage I (T2 N0 M0 B0) disease. This patient previously had been treated for mycosis fungoides using helical tomotherapy (HT) at a dose of 20 Gy to a localized region and experienced mild thrombocytopenia at that time. The patient then underwent retreatment 17 months later with TSHT to a dose of 12 Gy in 6 fractions with a mean bone marrow dose of 2.3 Gy and V10 = 4.28%. This patient once again experienced myelosuppression that included grade 4 thrombocytopenia. She also required blood and platelet transfusions. Conclusions Both patients treated with TSHT experienced severe bone marrow suppression including grade 4 thrombocytopenia. This was more severe than expected considering the relatively low overall prescription dose and despite a planning constraint placed on the bone marrow of a mean dose of

Mycosis fungoides (MF) represent the most common type of primary cutaneous lymphomas. Total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy to a total skin administered dose of 36 Gy represents a very effective treatment regimen and its role in the management of MF is well established. Unfortunately, the issue in MF is that despite the proved effectiveness of radiation therapy, disease regress, and the main goal of TSEB treatment seems to be the prolongation of the overall response duration time. Taking into consideration the high radio‐sensitivity of the disease, lower radiation doses have been tested with acceptable and comparable results. We prospectively analyzed low dose TSEB in 14 patients treated at ATTIKON University Hospital from 2011 to 2017. After a median duration of follow up time of 39 months we found that low dose TSEB is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, with minimal toxicity. The fact that it can be repeated safely in the natural course of a "regressive" disease makes it more attractive than the standard full dose scheme of 36 Gy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) for mycosis fungoides is popular because of reduced toxicity with effective palliation. We condensed TSEBT, reducing visits by half and overall treatment length by one third.Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of a novel condensed low-dose TSEBT for mycosis fungoides.Methods: We conducted a cohort study (2014-2018) with a median follow-up of 22.8 months. We delivered 12 Gy per 6 fractions with the modified Stanford technique, 3 fractions per week, with boosts to shadowed sites at risk between treatments, completing in 2 weeks. Primary outcomes included clinical response, duration of and time to response, and toxicity. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (pain, pruritus, and Dermatology Life Quality Index) and physician-scored disease burden (body surface area involvement and Modified Skin Weighted Assessment Tool).Results: Of 25 patients, stage IB was most common at the time of TSEBT (36%). The overall response rate was 88%. Most common was a near complete response (36%), and complete response was achieved in 6 (24%) patients. The median duration of response was 17.5 months (3.5-44.2), and the median time to response was 2 months (range, 0.9-4.1). No patients had toxicity of grade 3 or greater. QOL and disease burden showed significant benefit after TSEBT (P < .001).Limitations: Cohort study with limited sample size.Conclusions: Condensed, low-dose TSEBT has favorable outcomes and toxicity with logistical convenience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimal doses of total skin electron beam therapy for mycosis fungoides remain to be established. Clinical efficiency and adverse effects of middle-dose (25 Gy) vs. low-dose (10-12 Gy) total skin electron beam therapy were retrospectively compared in a series of 14 and 12 mycosis fungoides, respectively. Overall skin response rate was 96.2% (92.9% middle-dose and 100% low-dose; not significant (NS)). Overall complete and partial skin response rates were 57.7% (42.9% middle-dose and 75% low-dose; NS) and 38.5% (50% middle-dose and 25% low-dose; NS), respectively. All responding patients relapsed after an overall median time of 5 months (7 months middle-dose vs. 4 months low-dose; p = 0.164, NS). Tolerance was equally fair in both groups, with only grade 1 and 2 adverse events observed in 100% vs. 66.7% of patients in middle-dose and low-dose groups (NS). Although no significant difference was observed, middle-dose protocol may be recommended owing to a longer relapse-free survival for a similar tolerance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim of Study: The aim of this study is to evaluate some dosimetry parameters such as uniformity, surface dose, and max depth dose with thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) and EBT3 film in total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Methods: Stationary and rotary methods were set on Varian linear accelerator, Clinac 2100C. To create a radiation field large enough (168 cm × 60 cm) and uniform, the source skin distance was set 400 cm. Electron beam energy was 6 MeV. The skin dose values were obtained in 21 different points on the phantom surface. Results: The results of dose uniformity in stationary technique were obtained as 10% and 2.6% by TLDs and 6% and 2.3% by films in longitudinal axis and transverse axis, respectively. The measurements at rotational technique by TLDs at the referred conditions showed a homogeneous total field with intensity variation of 10% in the longitudinal axis and 4% at horizontal axis. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, stationary techniques are preferred for TSEBT. The main advantage of rotational techniques is reducing the time of treatment. The results also demonstrate that TLD should be routinely used in TSEBT treatment. Due to the high sensitivity of radiochromic films, this type of film was suitable for a wide therapeutic field. Comprehensive treatment to Rando phantom showed that the uniformity is better at the trunk than in the mobile parts of the body; the soles of the feet, perineum region, and scalp vertex should be treated in boost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Helical irradiation of the total skin (HITS) was modified as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-helical arc radiotherapy of total skin (HEARTS) technique and applied to an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient with disseminated leukemia cutis.Methods: The original HITS plan was revised for different regimens, i.e. HEARTS, low-dose HEARTS and SIB-HEARTS. The uniformity index (UI), conformity index (CI), and dose of organs at risk (OARs) were used to evaluate the plans. Additionally, the SIB-HEART (21/15 Gy) was delivered to the total skin and chloromas.Results: No significant differences were observed for the CI and UI between HITS and HEARTS regimens. Compared with HITS, the reduced mean doses to various bone marrows ranged from 17 to 88%. The mean OARs doses for the head, chest and abdomen of a patient with AML treated with SIB-HEARTS (21/15 Gy) were 2.1 to 21.9 Gy, 1.8 to 7.8 Gy and 1.7 to 3.3 Gy, respectively. No severe adverse effects were noted except for grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia.Conclusion: HEARTS and different regimens reduced the dose to OARs and bone marrow while maintaining the uniformity and conformity. SIB-HEARTS deliveries different doses to the total skin and enlarged tumors simultaneously.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered and approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital ( FEMH-106151-C ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (EORTC-CLTG) and following up on earlier versions published in 2006 and 2017 this document provides an updated standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). It considers recent relevant publications and treatment options introduced into clinical practice after 2017. Consensus was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Treatment options are assigned to each disease stage and, whenever possible and clinically useful, separated into first- and second line options annotated with levels of evidence. Major changes to the previous version include the incorporation of chlormethine, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab, recommendations on the use of pegylated interferon α (after withdrawal of recombinant unpegylated interferons), and the addition of paragraphs on supportive therapy and on the care of older patients. Still, skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF and most patients have a normal life expectancy but may suffer morbidity and impaired quality of life. In advanced disease treatment options have expanded recently. Most patients receive multiple consecutive therapies with treatments often having a relatively short duration of response. For those patients prognosis is still poor and only for a highly selected subset long term remission can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Understanding of the disease, its epidemiology and clinical course, and its most appropriate management are gradually advancing, and there is well-founded hope that this will lead to further improvements in the care of patients with MF/SS. • Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome are variants of cutaneous T cell lymphomas. • Prognosis and choice of treatment depend on disease stage. • Treatment recommendations are provided by the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumour Group. • Considerations for supportive care and treatment of elderly patients are included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A case of syringotropic mycosis fungoides without internal organ involvement received total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) and evolved into poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides. Subsequent oral psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy achieved complete remission. The value of TSEBT for syringotroopic mycosis fungoides is illustrated in this case.

In order to provide a common standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force (EORTC-CLTF) published in 2006 its consensus recommendations for the stage-adapted selection of management options for these neoplasms. Since then, the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of MF/SS has advanced, the staging system has been revised, new outcome data have been published and novel treatment options have been introduced. The purpose of the present document is to update the original recommendations bearing in mind that there are still only a limited number of controlled studies to support treatment decisions for MF/SS and that often treatment is determined by institutional experience and availability. This consensus on treatment recommendations was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Recommended treatment options are presented according to disease stage, whenever possible categorised into first- and second-line options and supported with levels of evidence as devised by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Skin-directed therapies are still the most appropriate option for early-stage MF, and most patients can look forward to a normal life expectancy. For patients with advanced disease, prognosis is still grim, and only for a highly selected subset of patients, prolonged survival can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). There is a high need for the development and investigation in controlled clinical trials of treatment options that are based on our increasing understanding of the molecular pathology of MF/SS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Leukemia cutis (LC) is a rare clinical presentation of leukemia that is associated with poor prognosisabs. To date, the value of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of LC remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness of various RT doses for LC. Methods and materials: Between January 2000 and January 2016, 13 patients underwent RT at our institution after exhibiting progressive disease following other treatment modalities. Results: A total of 36 radiation courses were administered to 13 patients (8 females, 5 males) with a median age of 41 years (range 2-76). Radiation modalities included 32 focal treatments, while total skin electron beam therapy was applied to four patients. The median RT dose was 27 Gy (range 8-34). A complete response rate (CRR) to RT was achieved for 32/36 (89%) lesions (100% for AML lesions versus 33% for the other leukemias; P < 0.001). The median duration of local control (DOLC) for the entire cohort was 38 months (range 0-98), while the median survival (MS) from the time of LC presentation was 13 months (range 2.5-106). The CRR for the LC lesions treated with high-dose regimens (>26 Gy) versus low-dose regimens (≤26 Gy) was 95 versus 83%, respectively ( P = 0.26), and the median DOLC was 44 months versus 10 months, respectively ( P = 0.019). AML patients had a better long-term outcome than the other patients according to median DOLC (40 months versus 2 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and MS (24 versus 6 months, P = 0.004). RT was well tolerated without significant adverse events. Conclusion: A radiation dose ≤26 Gy confer a comparable CRR to high-dose regimens and appears to be an effective treatment for controlling LC progression. However, radiation doses >26 Gy were associated with a longer DOLC. LC patients with underlying AML are associated with better outcome compared with other types of leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total-skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is one of most effective treatments that has been used for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Low-dose TSEBT regimens (10-12 Gy) appear to be an effective alternative to conventionaldose TSEBT (30-36 Gy), yielding short-term remission of cutaneous manifestations with minimal toxicity. TSEBT can be administered to patients any time after a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides (MF). Patients requiring rapid relief from cutaneous lesions or symptoms may particularly benefit from TSEBT as an initial therapy. Radiotherapy (RT) dose, boost radiation delivery, maintenance treatment, and radiation tolerability may enhance remission rates and improve relapse-free survival following TSEBT. In addition, salvage local RT or TSEBT may be safely applied with high effectiveness. In this review, we focus on the use of TSEBT in patients with several forms of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and highlight the potential of low-dose TSEBT as part of a promising therapeutic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses romidepsin and total skin electron beam therapy in advanced stage mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Topics include how cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma and that MF is a neoplasm that presents with patches and plaques in sun-protected areas and may progress to nodules and erythroderma.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Normally, MF has an indolent course although patients can progress to an advanced disease state (stages IIB-IVB). Advanced-stage disease is typically aggressive, leaving patients with debilitating symptoms and a decreased quality of life. Moreover, advanced-stage MF often proves refractory to therapy and carries a very poor prognosis. Total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy is a well-established and successful treatment for early stage MF; however, its efficacy dramatically decreases with advanced-stage disease. In fact, TSEB in advancedstage MF is generally considered to be palliative. Current consensus guidelines recommend a dose of 30-36 Gy to be delivered in 8-10 weeks; however, limited studies exist to determine the ideal treatment in Stage IV MF. Herein, we describe a case of a 50-year-old male who developed rapidly progressive stage IVB (T3N3M1B0) MF and was treated with low-dose (24 Gy) TSEB over 8 weeks. The patient was not treated with any systemic therapy before starting TSEB due to the widespread nature and the speed of disease progression. Remarkably, our patient showed nearly complete (95%) response of his MF with no apparent side effects from radiation. Furthermore, he has remained in remission over 4 years, requiring only a small boost to a few "shadowed" areas. Our case illustrates the benefit of using TSEB in stage IV MF. Additionally, our experience shows that low-dose TSEB can occasionally be efficacious in stage IV disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Standard-dose (36-Gy) total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a highly effective treatment in mycosis fungoides. However, the regimen is time-intensive and may be associated with significant toxicity. Objective We sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability associated with low-dose (12-Gy) TSEBT. Methods Data from 3 clinical trials using low-dose (12-Gy) TSEBT were pooled. In all trials, TSEBT-naïve patients with stage IB to IIIA mycosis fungoides were treated with TSEBT (12 Gy, 1 Gy per fraction over 3 weeks). The primary end point was clinical response rate. Secondary end points included time to response and duration of clinical benefit. Results In all, 33 patients enrolled. Eighteen were male; stages were 22 IB, 2 IIA, 7 IIB, and 2 IIIA. Overall response rate was 88% (29/33), including 9 patients with complete response. Median time to response was 7.6 weeks (3-12.4 weeks). Median duration of clinical benefit was 70.7 weeks (95% confidence interval 41.8-133.8 weeks). Toxicities from TSEBT were mild and reversible. Limitations Conclusions are limited because of the small number of patients. Conclusions Low-dose TSEBT provides reliable and rapid reduction of disease burden in patients with mycosis fungoides, which could be administered safely multiple times during the course of a patient's disease with acceptable toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This work reviews results of in vivo dosimetry (IVD) for total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy, focusing on new methods, data emerged within 2012. All quoted data are based on a careful review of the literature reporting IVD results for patients treated by means of TSEB therapy. Many of the reviewed papers refer mainly to now old studies and/or old guidelines and recommendations (by IAEA, AAPM and EORTC), because (due to intrinsic rareness of TSEB-treated pathologies) only a limited number of works and reports with a large set of numerical data and proper statistical analysis is up-to-day available in scientific literature. Nonetheless, a general summary of the results obtained by the now numerous IVD techniques available is reported; innovative devices and methods, together with areas of possible further and possibly multicenter investigations for TSEB therapies are highlighted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and Purpose: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an important skin-directed radiotherapeutic procedure done in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, namely, mycosis fungoides (MF). This procedure is usually done at larger source-to-surface distances with the patient standing on a rotatory platform. As the patient has to stand in different positions without any rigid immobilization devices, there are chances that the total skin may not get uniformly irradiated which could lead to nonuniform dose distributions. Therefore, all the necessary arrangements should be made to evaluate the dose for different regions of the skin using suitable in vivo dosimeters at the radiotherapy centers offering these treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency between the delivered and planned doses in vivo during TSEBT using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry., Materials and Methods: The surface dose for the six MF patients treated for TSEBT at our hospital from 2018 to 2022 was measured and evaluated. 2 cm × 2 cm Gafchromic ® EBT3 films were used to measure skin dose at reference body positions of clinical interest. All the patients were treated with the modified Stanford technique. The irradiated film strips were analyzed for the dose using the IMRT OmniPro software. The doses at respective positions were expressed as mean dose ± standard deviation and the deviation was calculated as the percentage of the prescribed dose., Results: One hundred and fifty-four Gafchromic ® EBT3 film strips irradiated on six TSEBT patients showed a maximum dose variation of 2.00 ± 0.14 Gy, in the central body regions. The dose variation in the peripheral areas such as hands and ears was larger. A variation of 2 ± 0.32 Gy was observed on the hands and ears. The uniformity of the dose delivered to maximum body parts was within -7% and +16% for the peripheral areas like hands. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine recommends a dose uniformity of 8% and 4% in the vertical and horizontal patient plane for direct incident beam; however, for oblique incidences like in the modified Stanford technique, the dose variation is about 15%., Conclusion: In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry for TSEBT yields objective data to find the under or overdose regions. That can be useful to provide quality treatment, especially when treatments tend to be as complex as TSEBT., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Medical Physics.)

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a highly radiosensitive disease. Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an effective option that may allow prolonged response for several months. Recently, a low-dose regimen (12 Gy) has been reported more frequently, with less complete response than for standard doses (36 Gy) but better safety. Our aim was to compare patients treated with 12-Gy and 36-40-Gy TSEBT regimens at our centre for efficacy and safety., Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study in Bordeaux University Hospital included all MF patients treated with 12-Gy or 36-40-Gy TSEBT between 2011 and 2020., Results: Patients presented with MF at the following stages: 15 T2, including 9 folliculotropic MF; 2 T3, including 1 folliculotropic; 8 T4, including 2 Sézary syndromes. The mean follow-up time after TSEBT was 43.5 months [range: 2-128] for the 36-40-Gy group and 25.2 months [range: 4-45] for the 12-Gy group. The 3-month overall response rate (ORR) was similar for both groups (84.6% for 36-40 Gy and 91.7% for 12 Gy), but there was a tendency to more complete response in the 36-40-Gy group (30.8% vs 8.3%, P=0.35). Progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be better in the 36-40-Gy group than in the low-dose group (15.7 months vs 5.3 months; P=0.28). Patients treated with low-dose TSEBT had a lower incidence of radiation dermatitis (16.7% vs 38.4%, P=0.42)., Conclusion: We confirm that TSEBT is an effective option, including at lower doses. Differences between low- and standard-dose regimens were not significant in our series. Although a low-dose regimen seemed to result in lower complete response and long-term efficacy rates in comparison with a standard dose, treatment at lower doses presents the advantage of repeatability, with fewer and weaker side effects, in the event of disease recurrence. Second-line treatments were mostly skin-directed in this group., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Total Skin Electron Beam (TSEB) irradiation is considered as the treatment of choice for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma internationally, for either curative purposes or palliative care. An attempt for the first application of this external radiation therapy technique in Greece took place at the Radiation Therapy Unit of 2nd Department of Radiology of University of Athens at University General Hospital “Attikon”. TSEB modality was developed on a linear accelerator VARIAN Clinac 2100C. To create a uniform and sufficiently large field () at , two symmetrical 6 MeV electron beams are combined with 17.5° tilts concerning the horizontal direction. An immobilization system was constructed to support patient during treatment and to modulate the composite electron field. Irradiation procedure demands a standing patient that takes, in total, six treatment positions. For the confirmation of treatment suitability and the determination of physical features of the clinical electron field, specific measurements were carried out using a parallel-plate ionization chamber and TLDs at water equivalent plastic and anthropomorphic phantoms. Measurements at the referred conditions showed a homogeneous total field with intensity variation of ±2% in the longitudinal axis and ±4% at horizontal axis. The mean energy of the composite field () is 3.4 MeV, the most probable energy () is 4.4 MeV and the half-value depth in water () is 1.5 g/cm2. The maximum X-ray background of the TSEB field is 2.1% at head and feet. The above results lead us to conclude that TSEB treatment using “Six-dual-field” technique can be applied in our department safely. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Total skin electron beam therapy has been in medical service since the middle of the last century in order to confront rare skin malignancies. Since then various techniques have been developed, all aiming at better clinical results in conjunction with less post-irradiation complications. In this article every available technique is presented in addition to physical parameters of technique establishment and common dose fractionation. This study also revealed the preference of the majority of institutes the last 20 years in “six dual field technique” at a high dose rate, which is a safe and effective treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]