Search

Background: Hemodynamic impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is not always univocally measured by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) assessment alone. When analyzing TEER procedure result, operators often encounter discrepancy between TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Objectives: This study sought to investigate the role of invasive hemodynamic monitoring during mitral valve TEER procedure on top of TEE guidance. Methods: We analyzed 78 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe MR who underwent TEER. Mitral pulse pressure fraction (MPF) was extracted from intraprocedural continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. Twenty-three patients with the same grade of MR not undergoing TEER were included as a control group. At follow-up, clinical and functional status in the majority of patients undergoing TEER were reassessed by NYHA classification and the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Results: TEER significantly reduced MR burden on both TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Post-TEER MPF was significantly reduced compared to both pre-TEER setting (P

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been established as a safe and effective option for treating patients with severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at prohibitive surgical risk. However, the significant cost presents a considerable disease burden in low-income countries. This case details the treatment of a high-surgical-risk patient with severe degenerative MR by using the GeminiOne (Peijia Medical) system—a novel Chinese TEER device.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve is a complex procedure requiring continuous image guidance with 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. In this context, the role of the echocardiographer is of paramount importance. Training in interventional echocardiography for procedures such as TEER requires comprehending the complicated workflow of the hybrid operating room and advanced imaging skills that go beyond traditional echocardiography training to guide the procedure. Despite TEER being more commonly performed, the training structure for interventional echocardiographers is lagging, with many practitioners not having any formal training in image guidance for this procedure. In this context, novel training strategies must be developed to increase exposure and aid training. In this review, the authors present a step-wise approach to training for image guidance during TEER of the mitral valve. The authors have deconstructed this complex procedure into modular components and have incremental stages of training based on different steps of the procedure. At each step, trainees must demonstrate proficiency before advancing to the next step, thus ensuring a more structured approach to attaining proficiency in this complex procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persisting iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) after transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) are associated with impaired outcomes. We investigated the natural history of relevant iASDs with left-to-right shunting post-M-TEER, predictors of spontaneous closure of iASD between 1 and 6 months post-M-TEER, and outcomes (heart failure [HF] hospitalization) in patients with spontaneous closure versus those with persistent iASD 6 months post-M-TEER. Patients with a relevant iASD 1-month post-M-TEER, who were treated conservatively in the randomized controlled MITHRAS trial, underwent clinical follow-up including transesophageal echocardiography 6 months post-M-TEER. Overall, 36 patients (median 77 [interquartile range 65–81] years; 36% women) completed the 6-months follow-up. Six (17%) patients had a spontaneous closure of the iASD. The eccentricity index of the iASD 1-month after M-TEER was the strongest predictor for spontaneous closure (Odds ratio 3.78; 95% confidence interval 1.26–11.33, p = 0.01) and an eccentricity index of < 1.9 provided a sensitivity of 77% at a specificity of 83% for iASD persistence (Area under the curve 0.83, p < 0.001) within 6-months post M-TEER. At follow-up, a numerical difference in the endpoint of HF hospitalization between the spontaneous closure and the residual shunt group (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.25) was observed. The eccentricity of the iASD was the strongest predictor for spontaneous closure at 1-months and an eccentricity index of < 1.9 is associated with a high persistence rate for 6 month after M-TEER. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03024268 Identifier: NCT03024268. a (red) is reflecting the mayor lengthwise dimension and b (blue) the mayor oblique dimension. The eccentricity index is calculated by dividing a through b. (Open circle) is depicting an example for a round iASD and (Open rhombus) an example for an eccentric iASD 1 month after M-TEER. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER. Methods and results Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04). Conclusions Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

Background: The impact of postero-anterior and medio-lateral mitral valve (MV) tethering patterns on outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is unknown. Methods: The ratio of the posterior to anterior MV leaflet angle (PLA/ALA) in MV segment 2 was defined as postero-anterior tethering asymmetry. Medio-lateral tethering asymmetry was assessed as the ratio of the medial (segment 3) to lateral (segment 1) MV tenting area. We used receiver-operating characteristics and a Cox regression model to identify cut-off values of asymmetric anteroposterior and medio-lateral tethering for prediction of 2 year all-cause mortality after TMVR. Results: Among 178 SMR patients, postero-anterior tethering was asymmetric in 67 patients (37.9%, PLA/ALA ratio > 1.54). Asymmetric medio-lateral tethering (tenting area ratio > 1.49) was observed in 49 patients (27.5%). M-TEER reduced MR to ≤ 2 + in 92.1% of patients; MR reduction was less effective in the presence of asymmetric postero-anterior tethering (p = 0.02). A multivariable Cox regression model identified both types of asymmetric MV tethering to be associated with increased all-cause 2-year mortality (postero-anterior tethering asymmetry: HR = 2.77, CI 1.43–5.38; medio-lateral tethering asymmetry: HR = 2.90, CI 1.54–5.45; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Asymmetric postero-anterior and medio-lateral MV tethering patterns are associated with increased 2-year mortality in patients undergoing M-TEER for SMR. A detailed echocardiographic analysis of MV anatomy may help to identify patients who profit most from M-TEER. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER. Methods and results: Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors investigated whether iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) closure post-transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TMVR) is superior to conservative therapy (CT) and whether outcomes (death/heart failure [HF] hospitalization) differ between patients with and without an iASD post-TMVR. Transseptal access for TMVR can create an iASD, which is associated with impaired outcomes. Controversially, the creation of an iASD in HF has been linked to improved hemodynamics. 80 patients with an iASD and relevant left-to-right shunting (Qp:Qs ≥1.3) 30 days following TMVR were randomized to CT or interventional closure of the iASD (MITHRAS [Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair] cohort), and 235 patients without an iASD served as a comparative cohort. All patients of the MITHRAS cohort (mean age 77 ± 9 years, 39% women) received their allocated treatment, and follow-up was completed for all MITHRAS and comparative cohort (mean age 77 ± 8 years, 47% women) patients. Twelve months post-TMVR, there was no significant difference in the combined endpoint of death or HF hospitalization within the MITHRAS cohort (iASD closure: 35% vs CT 50%; P = 0.26). The combined endpoint was more frequent among patients within the MITHRAS cohort as opposed to the comparative cohort (43% vs 17%; P < 0.0001), primarily driven by a higher rate of HF hospitalization (34% vs 8%; P = 0.004). In this randomized controlled trial, interventional closure of a relevant iASD 1 month after TMVR did not result in improved clinical outcomes at 12 months post-TMVR. Patients with an iASD are at higher risk for HF hospitalization independent of iASD management and warrant close follow-up. (Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair [MITHRAS]; NCT03024268) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemodynamic impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is not always univocally measured by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) assessment alone. When analyzing TEER procedure result, operators often encounter discrepancy between TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the role of invasive hemodynamic monitoring during mitral valve TEER procedure on top of TEE guidance., Methods: We analyzed 78 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe MR who underwent TEER. Mitral pulse pressure fraction (MPF) was extracted from intraprocedural continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. Twenty-three patients with the same grade of MR not undergoing TEER were included as a control group. At follow-up, clinical and functional status in the majority of patients undergoing TEER were reassessed by NYHA classification and the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)., Results: TEER significantly reduced MR burden on both TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Post-TEER MPF was significantly reduced compared to both pre-TEER setting ( P  < 0.001) and control group ( P  < 0.001). At follow-up, while MR reduction assessed by TEE was associated with an improved functional status in terms of the 12-item KCCQ but not of NYHA classification, a greater reduction in MPF was associated with a significant amelioration of both NYHA classification ( P  = 0.036) and 12-item KCCQ ( P  = 0.032)., Conclusions: MPF could provide an immediate estimate of the real hemodynamic impact of MR and a prompt prediction of the functional improvement after TEER., Competing Interests: Prof Leone has received speaking honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Bracco Imaging and Abiomed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an established treatment for primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR). The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of different risk scores for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after TEER. We analyzed data from 206 patients treated for MR at a tertiary European center between 2011 and 2023 and compared the accuracy of different mitral and surgical risk scores: EuroSCORE II, GRASP, MITRALITY, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore, and STS for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in PMR and SMR. A subanalysis of SMR-only patients with the addition of COAPT Risk Score and baseline N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) list was also performed. MITRALITY had the best discriminative ability for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.74, respectively, in a composed group of PMR and SMR. In a SMR-only population, MITRALITY also presented the best AUC for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with values of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively. MITRALITY was the best mitral TEER risk model for both 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in a population of PMR and SMR patients, as well as in SMR patients only. Surgical risk scores, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore and NT-proBNP alone showed poor predictive values. • Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common and not all patients respond the same way to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). • The performance of different TEER risk scores were evaluated in our study. • Mitrality was the best predictive model in a composed population of primary MR and secondary MR (SMR). • Mitrality was the best predictive model in a SMR-only population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with major morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an interventional procedure for MR, which has gained popularity in recent years as an alternative solution to surgical valve repair in high-risk surgical candidates. However, there are no definite guidelines following TEER failures to determine if patients would benefit from a redo TEER or surgical mitral valve (MV) repair. Here, we present one such clinical dilemma. In patients who have failed the TEER of the MV, surgical risk must be determined in conjunction with a multidisciplinary team, as surgical MV replacement may be performed at advanced centers in high-risk patients with good results., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Dasari et al.)

Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve with the MitraClip device has been shown to serve as a safe and effective treatment for severe mitral regurgitation in the high-risk surgical population. Although the device originally was designed for the reduction of degenerative mitral regurgitation resulting from primary leaflet abnormalities, numerous studies have included patients with functional mitral regurgitation from annular or ventricular distortion. Two recent landmark studies examined the use of the MitraClip device for functional mitral regurgitation treatment and found drastically opposing results. Data reconciliation by others has suggested only a subset of those with functional mitral regurgitation may benefit from this treatment. Herein 2 seemingly similar cases to illustrate the subtle differences in patient selection that eventually may change the clinical outcome for this procedure are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]