Search

The distribution of carbapenemases in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has recently undergone a change in our region. According to the Colombian National Institute of Health, there is an increasing prevalence of NDM and NDM-KPC co-producing strains. We carried-out an ambispective cohort study of adult inpatients from Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (2021-2023), infected or colonized with CRE, in which carbapenemases immunochromatographic assay was performed. Out of the 150 patients included in the study, 71.3 % presented with an infection, and carbapenemases were detected in 92.7 % of these cases. Among them, KPC predominated (54 %), while 16.7 % demonstrated enzyme coproductions, mainly KPC-NDM. CRE infected patients had an 18.7 % 30-days mortality, but we could not demonstrate an association between type of carbapenemase and mortality rate (p = 0.82). Logistic regression analysis suggested that ICU admission was independently correlated to fatality (OR 5.08; CI 1.68-16.01). NDM and KPC-NDM presence in CRE poses a public health threat and a therapeutic challenge, with unknown mortality differences according to the carbapenemases pattern. Nevertheless, there was not an association between enzyme type and mortality., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Long-term use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV infection might lead to the necessity of switching regimens. We aimed to analyze the reasons for the ART switch, the time-to-switch of ART, and its associated factors in a Colombian cohort., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort in 20 HIV clinics, including participants ≥18 years old with confirmed HIV infection who underwent an ART switch from January 2017 to December 2019 with at least 6 months of follow-up. A time-to-event analysis and an exploratory Cox model were performed., Results: 796 participants switched ART during the study period. The leading cause of ART switch was drug intolerance ( n = 449; 56.4%) with a median time-to-switch of 12.2 months. The longest median time-to-switch was due to regimen simplification (42.4 months). People ≥50 years old (HR = 0.6; 95% CI (0.5-0.7) and CDC stage 3 at diagnosis (HR = 0.8; 95% CI (0.6-0.9) had less hazard for switching ART over time., Conclusions: In this Colombian cohort, drug intolerance was the main cause of the ART switch, and the time-to-switch is shorter than reports from other countries. In Colombia, it is crucial to apply current recommendations for ART initiation to choose regimens with a better tolerability profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: WL declares MSD unrestricted grant. MGG and SMV declare personal fees from MSD. SLVB and CAM declare MSD grant. CBR and JU are employees of MSD, Colombia, who may own stock and/or hold stock options in Merck and Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA. EM reports grants, personal fees and other from VIIV/ GSK, personal fees and other from Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp, personal fees and other from Biotoscana gilead group. SL was MSD employee during manuscript development SVC, MJR, LAM, MM, LMR, OS, JF, CG, NF, MB, JA, DA, JAA do not declare any conflict of interest.

The SARS CoV-2 antibody and CD4 + T cell responses induced by natural infection and/or vaccination decline over time and cross-recognize other viral variants at different levels. However, there are few studies evaluating the levels and durability of the SARS CoV-2-specific antibody and CD4 + T cell response against the Mu, Gamma, and Delta variants. Here, we examined, in two ambispective cohorts of naturally-infected and/or vaccinated individuals, the titers of anti-RBD antibodies and the frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + T cells up to 6 months after the last antigen exposure. In naturally-infected individuals, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response declined 6 months post-symptoms onset. However, the kinetic observed depended on the severity of the disease, since individuals who developed severe COVID-19 maintained the binding antibody titers. Also, there was detectable binding antibody cross-recognition for the Gamma, Mu, and Delta variants, but antibodies poorly neutralized Mu. COVID-19 vaccines induced an increase in antibody titers 15-30 days after receiving the second dose, but these levels decreased at 6 months. However, as expected, a third dose of the vaccine caused a rise in antibody titers. The dynamics of the antibody response upon vaccination depended on the previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Lower levels of vaccine-induced antibodies were associated with the development of breakthrough infections. Vaccination resulted in central memory spike-specific CD4 + T cell responses that cross-recognized peptides from the Gamma and Mu variants, and their duration also depended on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. In addition, we found cross-reactive CD4 + T cell responses in unexposed and unvaccinated individuals. These results have important implications for vaccine design for new SARS-CoV-2 variants of interest and concern., Competing Interests: AS is or has been a consultant for Arcturus, Cell Carta/Caprion, Oxford Immunotech, Repertoire and Pfizer, Moderna, AstrZeneca, Flowpharma, Qiagen, EmerVac and Gritstone. La Jolla Institute has filed for patent protection for various aspects of T cell epitope and vaccine design work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Martel, Cuervo-Rojas, Ángel, Ariza, González, Ramírez-Santana, Acosta-Ampudia, Murcia-Soriano, Montoya, Cardozo-Romero, Valderrama-Beltrán, Cepeda, Castellanos, Gómez-Restrepo, Perdomo-Celis, Gazquez, Dickson, Brien, Mateus, Grifoni, Sette, Weiskopf and Franco.)

Background: Viral reactivations and co-infections have been reported among COVID-19 patients. However, studies on the clinical outcomes of different viral reactivations and co-infections are currently in limit. Thus, the primary purpose of this review is to perform an overarching investigation on the cases of latent virus reactivation and co-infection in COVID-19 patients to build collective evidence contributing to improving patient health. The aim of the study was to conduct a literature review to compare the patient characteristics and outcomes of reactivations and co-infections of different viruses., Methods: Our population of interest included confirmed COVID-19 patients who were diagnosed with a viral infection either concurrently or following their COVID-19 diagnosis. We extracted the relevant literature through a systematic search using the key terms in the online databases including the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), from inception onwards up to June 2022. The authors independently extracted data from eligible studies and assessed the risk of bias using the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting (CARE) guidelines and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Main patient characteristics, frequency of each manifestation, and diagnostic criteria used in studies were summarized in tables., Results: In total, 53 articles were included in this review. We identified 40 reactivation studies, 8 coinfection studies, and 5 studies where concomitant infection in COVID-19 patients was not distinguished as either reactivation or coinfection. Data were extracted for 12 viruses including IAV, IBV, EBV, CMV, VZV, HHV-1, HHV-2, HHV-6, HHV-7, HHV-8, HBV, and Parvovirus B19. EBV, HHV-1, and CMV were most frequently observed within the reactivation cohort, whereas IAV and EBV within the coinfection cohort. In both reactivation and coinfection groups, patients reported cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and immunosuppression as comorbidities, acute kidney injury as complication, and lymphopenia and elevated D-dimer and CRP levels from blood tests. Common pharmaceutical interventions in two groups included steroids and antivirals., Conclusion: Overall, these findings expand our knowledge on the characteristics of COVID-19 patients with viral reactivations and co-infections. Our experience with current review indicates a need for further investigations on virus reactivation and coinfection among COVID-19 patients., (© 2023. Pan American Health Organization.)

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) is a global threat, but the distribution and clinical significance of carbapenemases are unclear. The aim of this study was to define characteristics and outcomes of CRPA infections and the global frequency and clinical impact of carbapenemases harboured by CRPA., Methods: We conducted an observational, prospective cohort study of CRPA isolated from bloodstream, respiratory, urine, or wound cultures of patients at 44 hospitals (10 countries) between Dec 1, 2018, and Nov 30, 2019. Clinical data were abstracted from health records and CRPA isolates were whole-genome sequenced. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality from the day the index culture was collected. We compared outcomes of patients with CRPA infections by infection type and across geographic regions and performed an inverse probability weighted analysis to assess the association between carbapenemase production and 30-day mortality., Findings: We enrolled 972 patients (USA n=527, China n=171, south and central America n=127, Middle East n=91, Australia and Singapore n=56), of whom 581 (60%) had CRPA infections. 30-day mortality differed by infection type (bloodstream 21 [30%] of 69, respiratory 69 [19%] of 358, wound nine [14%] of 66, urine six [7%] of 88; p=0·0012) and geographical region (Middle East 15 [29%] of 52, south and central America 20 [27%] of 73, USA 60 [19%] of 308, Australia and Singapore three [11%] of 28, China seven [6%] of 120; p=0·0002). Prevalence of carbapenemase genes among CRPA isolates also varied by region (south and central America 88 [69%] of 127, Australia and Singapore 32 [57%] of 56, China 54 [32%] of 171, Middle East 27 [30%] of 91, USA ten [2%] of 527; p<0·0001). KPC-2 (n=103 [49%]) and VIM-2 (n=75 [36%]) were the most common carbapenemases in 211 carbapenemase-producing isolates. After excluding USA patients, because few US isolates had carbapenemases, patients with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections had higher 30-day mortality than those with non-carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections in both unadjusted (26 [22%] of 120 vs 19 [12%] of 153; difference 9%, 95% CI 3-16) and adjusted (difference 7%, 95% CI 1-14) analyses., Interpretation: The emergence of different carbapenemases among CRPA isolates in different geographical regions and the increased mortality associated with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections highlight the therapeutic challenges posed by these organisms., Funding: National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All authors report funding support from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study. Additionally, during the conduct of this study, and outside of the submitted work, the authors report the following disclosures. KSK reports consulting fees paid directly to him by Merck, Shionogi, Qpex, and Micrux. JG-D reports grants and contracts paid to her institution from NIH, BARDA, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Pfizer, BioNTech SE, GCAR, Hoffman La-Roche, I-Mab Bioppharma, Rebiotix, Target Health, LLC OBO Lilly USA, GlaxoSmithKline, Summit Limited, Cidara Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Seres Therapeutics; and Infectious Diseases Society of America Research Committee participation paid to her directly. SSK reports speaker and advisory board payments from Pfizer, Astellas, Novartis, Merck, and Gilead. JMO reports speaker payments from Pfizer, MSD, and Biotoscana; and board participation on the Chair Ethics Committee. SLV-B reports personal fees from Pfizer, Biotoscana, and MSD; meeting support from MSD and Pfizer; and data safety monitoring board participation with MSD and GlaxoSmithKline. PT reports honoraria payments to his institution from Aj Biologics and bioMérieux. GW reports payment to his institution from Allergan for contracted activities. LMA reports grants and contracts paid to her institution from Rainmakers/CDC multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults with SARS-CoV-2, and Regeneron study co-investigator; consulting and honoraria paid directly to them from Medscape for CME lectures, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals for advisory board participation; and volunteer work as the director of the IDSA Board of Directors. KO reports payments for educational events and presentations from Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Farma de Colombia; meeting support from Pfizer, MSD, and Gilead; and expert testimony support from Pfizer, bioMérieux, and MSD. MES reports speaker fees from Pfizer (Argentina); advisory board participation for Wockhardt; consultancy for Basilea; and data safety monitoring board participation with Fulcrum Therapeutics. JMM reports grants from Pfizer, MSD, and bioMérieux, the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development; and the Agencia Nacional de Investigation y Desarrollo Millennium Science Initiative/Millennium Initiative for Collaborative Research on Bacterial Resistance, Government of Chile. DLP reports grants and contracts paid to his institution from Merck, Pfizer, and Shionogi; consulting and honoraria payments to him by Merck, Shionogi, QPex, Spero Therapeutics, Sumitomo, Pfizer, and bioMérieux; meeting support from Shionogi; and board and committee participation with Symvivo, and AMR action fund. SE reports grants from the NIAID and the NIH and Degruter (Editor in Chief for Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases); royalties from Taylor & Francis; consulting fees from Genentech, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Microbiotix, Johnson & Johnson, Endologix, ChemoCentryx, Becton Dickinson, Atricure, Roviant, Neovasc, Nobel Pharma, Horizon, International Drug Development Institute, SVB Leerink; payments from Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks; meeting support from the US Food and Drug Administration, the Deming Conference on Applied Statistics, the Clinical Trial Transformation Initiative, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, the International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, and the Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Conference; and board member participation for the NIH, the Breast International Group, the University of Pennsylvania, Duke University, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Akouos, Apellis, Teva, Vir, DayOneBio, Alexion, Tracon, Rakuten, AbbVie, Nuvelution, Clover, FHI Clinical, Lung Biotech, SAB Biopharm, Advantagene, the American Statistical Association, the Society for Clinical Trials, and the Frontier Science Foundation. RAB reports grants and contracts, paid to his institution, by VenatoRx, Wockhardt, and Merck; payments made to him by Pfizer to moderate meeting sessions; patents with Case Western Reserve University on the development of boronic acid transition state inhibitors for β-lactamases (WO2022187362A1, US9949995B2, and US20170252326A1); and payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board, safety oversight committee support, and Logistics Associate for DMID-CROMS (contractor) with Technical Resources International. MVV reports contracts, consulting fees, and honoraria payments from Pfizer and MSD; consulting fees from West Quimica Colombia; and honoraria from bioMérieux. RP reports grants from BioFire Diagnostics, ContraFect, and TenNor Therapeutics; is a consultant to Curetis, Specific Technologies, Next Gen Diagnostics, PathoQuest, Selux Diagnostics, 1928 Diagnostics, PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Torus Biosystems, Mammoth Biosciences, and Qvella, for which monies are paid to Mayo Clinic; is a consultant to Netflix and CARB-X; has a patent on Bordetella pertussis and parapertussis PCR issued (US8507201B2), a patent on a device and method for sonication (with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic; US7076117B2), and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued (US8802414B2); receives an editor's stipend from the Infectious Diseases Society of America; and receives honoraria from the National Board of Medical Examiners, UpToDate, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course. CAA reports the grants and contracts paid to his institution from NIH and NIAID, MeMed Diagnostics, Entasis Therapeutics, Merck Pharmaceuticals, and Harris County Public Health; payments to him for UpToDate royalties, reimbursement of meeting attendance, and speaking from Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Society for Microbiology, Society of Hospital Epidemiology of America, European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, bioMérieux Foundation, Sociedad Argentina de Infectologia, Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia, Sociedad Colombiana de Infectologia, Panamerican Society for Infectious Diseases, Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases, reviewer participation as part of the NIH grant Review Study Sections, travel expenses from the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) Board of Directors, and for Editor in Chief for Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; non-paid participation with WHO Antibacterial Pipeline Advisory Group; and participation on the IDSA Board of Directors. HFC reports participation on a Merck data safety monitoring board for molnupiravir paid directly to him, stock ownership in Moderna and Merck, and a position as expert witness for Lilly and Nexus Pharmaceuticals. VGF reports grants to his institution from the NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, ContraFect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Basilea, and Janssen; royalties from UpToDate; personal fees from Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines, MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, ContraFect, Regeneron, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics, C3J, Armata, Valanbio, Akagera, Aridis, and Roche; editorial stipend from Infectious Diseases of America; pending patent for a host gene expression signature diagnostic for sepsis (US9850539B2); and stock options with Valanbio and ArcBio. YD reports grants from Entasis, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Shionogi, and Kanto Chemical paid to his institution; consulting fees paid directly to him from Meiji Seika Pharma, Shionogi, Gilead, MSD, Chugai, and bioMérieux; and speaker payments from MSD, Shionogi, AstraZeneca, Teijin Healthcare, Gilead, FujiFilm Toyama Chemical, bioMerieux, HU Frontier, and Eiken Chemical paid to him. DvD reports grants and contracts from the NIH and Merck paid to his institution outside of the published work; and consultancy for Astellas, Merck, Allergan, T2Biosystems, Roche, Achaogen, Neumedicine, Shionogi, Pfizer, Entasis, QPex, Wellspring, and Karius. MJS reports contract payments to his institution from Merck, Allergan, BioFire Diagnostics, Affinity Biosensors, and SNIPRBiome; personal consulting fees from Shionogi; and data and safety monitoring board participation for Spero Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence, prevalence, and seroconversion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated factors among healthcare workers (HCWs) of a University Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. An ambispective cohort was established from March 2020 to February 2021. From November 2020 to February 2021, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured on two occasions 14-90 days apart to determine seroprevalence and seroconversion. We used multivariate log-binomial regression to evaluate factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among 2,597 HCWs, the cumulative incidence of infection was 35.7%, and seroprevalence was 21.5%. A reduced risk of infection was observed among those aged 35-44 and ≥45 years (adjusted relative risks [aRRs], 0.84 and 0.83, respectively), physicians (aRR, 0.77), those wearing N95 respirators (aRR, 0.82) and working remotely (aRR, 0.74). Being overweight (aRR, 1.18) or obese (aRR, 1.24); being a nurse or nurse assistant (aRR, 1.20); working in the emergency room (aRR, 1.45), general wards (aRR, 1.45), intensive care unit (aRR, 1.34), or COVID-19 areas (aRR, 1.17); and close contact with COVID-19 cases (aRR, 1.47) increased the risk of infection. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection found in this study reflects the dynamics of the first year of the pandemic in Bogotá. A high burden of infection calls for strengthening prevention and screening measures for HCWs, focusing especially on those at high risk., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Risk of anal squamous cell carcinoma (anal cancer) is greater among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We describe the frequency of and factors associated with abnormal anal cytology results in Colombian MSM living with HIV., Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included MSM ≥18 years old living with HIV screened with anal cytology at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia between January 2019 and February 2020. A multivariable log-binomial regression model estimated associations with abnormal anal cytology., Results: A total of 211 patients were included. Mean age was 35.6 years. Sixty-eight (32.3%) had an abnormal anal cytology result: ASC-US 33.8% ( n = 23); LSIL 60.3% ( n = 41); and HSIL 5.9% ( n = 4). MSM with an STI diagnosis in the previous 12 months (RR 1.48, [95% CI 1.03-2.12], p = 0.032) or with a CD4 + T cell count <200 (RR 2.08 [95% CI 1.16-3.73], p = 0.014) were significantly more likely to have abnormal anal cytology., Conclusions: These data provide crucial information to guide scale up of anal cancer screening at select centers in Colombia. Our results also suggest STI prevention efforts and improved virological control among MSM living with HIV may have the secondary benefit of reducing the risk of anal cancer.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a global threat. We therefore analysed the bacterial characteristics of CRKP infections and the clinical outcomes of patients with CRKP infections across different countries., Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, cohort study (CRACKLE-2), hospitalised patients with cultures positive for CRKP were recruited from 71 hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, Colombia, Lebanon, Singapore, and the USA. The first culture positive for CRKP was included for each unique patient. Clinical data on post-hospitalisation death and readmission were collected from health records, and whole genome sequencing was done on all isolates. The primary outcome was a desirability of outcome ranking at 30 days after the index culture, and, along with bacterial characteristics and 30-day all-cause mortality (a key secondary outcome), was compared between patients from China, South America, and the USA. The desirability of outcome ranking was adjusted for location before admission, Charlson comorbidity index, age at culture, Pitt bacteremia score, and anatomical culture source through inverse probability weighting; mortality was adjusted for the same confounders, plus region where relevant, through multivariable logistic regression. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03646227, and is complete., Findings: Between June 13, 2017, and Nov 30, 2018, 991 patients were enrolled, of whom 502 (51%) met the criteria for CRKP infection and 489 (49%) had positive cultures that were considered colonisation. We observed little intra-country genetic variation in CRKP. Infected patients from the USA were more acutely ill than were patients from China or South America (median Pitt bacteremia score 3 [IQR 2-6] vs 2 [0-4] vs 2 [0-4]) and had more comorbidities (median Charlson comorbidity index 3 [IQR 2-5] vs 1 [0-3] vs 1 [0-2]). Adjusted desirability of outcome ranking outcomes were similar in infected patients from China (n=246), South America (n=109), and the USA (n=130); the estimates were 53% (95% CI 42-65) for China versus South America, 50% (41-61) for the USA versus China, and 53% (41-66) for the USA versus South America. In patients with CRKP infections, unadjusted 30-day mortality was lower in China (12%, 95% CI 8-16; 29 of 246) than in the USA (23%, 16-30; 30 of 130) and South America (28%, 20-37; 31 of 109). Adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality was higher in South America than in China (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·82, 95% CI 2·22-10·50) and the USA (aOR 3·34, 1·50-7·47), with the mortality difference between the USA and China no longer being significant (aOR 1·44, 0·70-2·96)., Interpretation: Global CRKP epidemics have important regional differences in patients' baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, and in bacterial characteristics. Research findings from one region might not be generalisable to other regions., Funding: The National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MW, ME, LC, YY, ZL, SS, EC, LL, SSK, HG, KM, LK, SDR, SHM, CM, JR, MVV, CH, RA, KB, BCF, BNK, and RAB report funding support from the ARLG of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study. BMH reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681), during the conduct of this study, and a grants from the NIH and the NIAID (K01AI148593–01), outside the submitted work. JMM reports funding support from the ALRG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study and grants from Pfizer, MSD, and bioMerieux, outside the submitted work. KO reports funding support from the ALRG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; payments for educational events and presentations from Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Farma de Colombia; and meeting support from Pfizer, MSD, and Gilead, outside the submitted work. GW reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681), and from Allergan. MJS reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; contracts payments, to his institution, from Merck, Allergan, BioFire Diagnostics, and Affinity Biosensors; personal consulting fees from Achaogen and Shionogi; and board participation for Spero Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. SLV-B reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study and personal fees from MSD and Biotoscana, outside the submitted work. MES reports grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study; speaker fees from Pfizer (Argentina); advisory board participation for Wockhardt; and consultancy for Basilea, outside the submitted work. CL reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study and salary support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH (award number T32GM086330) outside the submitted work. DLP reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; grants and contracts with MERCK, Pfizer, and Shionogi; consulting fees from Merck, Shionogi, and Qpex; payments and financial support from Sumitomo, Merck, Pfizer, bioMerieux, and Shionogi; and board participation for Symvivo, outside the submitted work. SE reports grants from the NIAID and the NIH and Degruter (Editor in Chief for Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases); royalties from Taylor & Francis; consulting fees from Genentech, AstraZeneca, Cardinal Health, Microbiotix, Stryker, Atricure, Roivant, Neovasc, Nobel Pharma, Horizon, the International Drug Development Institute, and SVB Leerink; payments from Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks, Osaka University, and the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center of Japan; meeting support from the US Food and Drug Administration, the Deming Conference on Applied Statistics, the Clinical Trial Transformation Initiative, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, and the Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Conference; and board member participation for the NIH, the Breast International Group, the University of Pennsylvania, Duke University, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen, Teva, Vir, Shire, Alexion, Gilead, Tracon, Rakuten, Abbvie, Nuvelution, Clover, FHI Clinical, Lung Biotech, SAB Biopharm, Advantagene, the American Statistical Association, the Society for Clinical Trials, and the Frontier Science Foundation, outside the submitted work. YD reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; grants from Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, Shionogi, Astellas, and Kanto Chemical, outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Janssen, MSD, Entasis, VenatoRx, AstraZeneca, Gilead, FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical, bioMerieux, and Meiji Seika Pharma, outside the submitted work. RP reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; reports grants from Merck, ContraFect, TenNor Therapeutics, and Shionogi; is a consultant to Curetis, Specific Technologies, Next Gen Diagnostics, PathoQuest, Selux Diagnostics, 1928 Diagnostics, PhAST, and Qvella, for which monies are paid to Mayo Clinic; is a consultant to Netflix; has a patent on Bordetella pertussis (parapertussis) PCR issued, a patent on a device and method for sonication (with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic), and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued; receives an editor's stipend from the Infectious Diseases Society of America; and receives honoraria from the National Board of Medical Examiners, UpToDate, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course, outside the submitted work. HFC reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; personal fees from Merck; and stock ownership from Moderna, outside the submitted work. VGF reports personal Fees from Novartis, Novadigm, Durata, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines, Cerexa, Tetraphase, Trius, MedImmune, Bayer, Theravance, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, xBiotech, Contrafect, Regeneron, Basilea, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics, C3J, Armata, Valanbio, Akagera, and Aridis; grants to his institution from the NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, Contrafect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Basilea, and Janssen; educational fees from Green Cross, Cubist, Cerexa, Durata, Theravance, and Debiopharm; royalties from UpToDate; and stock options in Valanbio. CAA is employed at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, TX, USA; declares money paid to the University of Texas as part of a grant from Merck, MeMed Diagnostics, Entasis Therapeutics, and the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681); reports royalties paid as personal fees from UptoDate (Harrison Principles of Internal Medicine and Mandell Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases); reports personal fees from the NIH and the NIAID for being a study section member and grant reviewer; reports an editor-in-chief stipend from the American Society for Microbiology for Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; reports reimbursement for travel to Infectious Disease Week and Infectious Disease programme committee meetings as Infectious Disease chair from the Infectious Disease Society of America; and reports reimbursement for traveling to the American Society for Microbiology Microbe conference from the American Society for Microbiology. DvD reports funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681) during the conduct of this study; is a consultant for Actavis, Tetraphase, Sanofi Pasteur, MedImmune, Astellas, Merck, Allergan, T2Biosystems, Roche, Achaogen, Neumedicine, Shionogi, Pfizer, Entasis, QPex, Wellspring, Karius, and Utility; receives an editor's stipend from the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; and reports grants from the NIH, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at increased risk of anal cancer. Anal cytology can be used to screen for dysplasia, with high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) required for diagnostic confirmation. We describe the impact lack of HRA had on management of abnormal screening results in Bogotá, Colombia., Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes MSM with HIV who underwent anal cytology screening between January 2019February 2020, with colorectal surgery (CRS) follow-up through July 2020. Cytology results included atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Categorical and continuous variables were compared via Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum, respectively., Results: Of 211 MSM screened, 68 had abnormal cytology: ASC-US (n = 23), LSIL (n = 41), HSIL (n = 4). Sixty (88.2%) were referred to CRS, and 51 (75.0%) attended ≥ 1 appointment. At initial assessment, 17 were referred for anal exam under anesthesia (EUA) for tissue resection, and 21 for rectosigmoidoscopy. Having perianal condyloma was associated with recommendation for EUA (P < 0.001), while cytology grade of dysplasia was not (P = 0.308). Eleven (16.2%) underwent EUA for condyloma resection., Conclusions: Few studies have described anal cancer screening in settings without HRA. We found lack of HRA limited management of abnormal cytology in Colombia. Those with condyloma underwent resection, but HRA remains necessary to localize and treat microscopic disease. Next steps include implementation of HRA in order to further develop the anal cancer screening program for MSM with HIV in Bogotá., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a microorganism that colonizes nostrils and different parts of the body, which is considered a risk factor to acquire invasive infections, especially in cardiovascular surgery patients. Objective: To determine the frequency of nasal colonization by MRSA and to establish the clinical characteristics in patients scheduled for cardiovascular surgery. Materials and methods: This was a descriptive study conducted between February and December, 2015. We included adult patients scheduled for cardiovascular surgery at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia. Colonization was identified by real-time PCR from nasal swabs. Colonized patients were treated with mupirocin 2.0% intranasally twice a day and bathed with chlorhexidine 4% from the neck downwards for five days. At the end of this treatment, PCR control was carried out. Results: We included 141 patients with a percentage of nasal colonization of 13.4% (19/141). There were 52 hospitalized patients and 89 outpatients with a percentage of nasal colonization of 17.3% (9/52), and 11.2% (10/89), respectively. All colonized patients who received treatment had a negative PCR at the end of the regime and none of the participating patients had a surgical site infection by S. aureus at the end of the study. Conclusions: Nasal colonization was observed both in hospitalized patients and outpatients. Decolonization treatment with mupirocin was effective to eradicate the carrier state in the short term, which could impact the rates of surgical wound infection associated with cardiovascular surgery.

Background: Short-term peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (PVCR-BSI) rates have not been systematically studied in resource-limited countries, and data on their incidence by number of device days are not available., Methods: Prospective, surveillance study on PVCR-BSI conducted from September 1, 2013, to May 31, 2019, in 727 intensive care units (ICUs), by members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC), from 268 hospitals in 141 cities of 42 countries of Africa, the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South East Asia, and Western Pacific regions. For this research, we applied definition and criteria of the CDC NHSN, methodology of the INICC, and software named INICC Surveillance Online System., Results: We followed 149,609 ICU patients for 731,135 bed days and 743,508 short-term peripheral venous catheter (PVC) days. We identified 1,789 PVCR-BSIs for an overall rate of 2.41 per 1,000 PVC days. Mortality in patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 6.67%, and mortality was 18% in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. The length of stay of patients with PVC but without PVCR-BSI was 4.83 days, and the length of stay was 9.85 days in patients with PVC and PVCR-BSI. Among these infections, the microorganism profile showed 58% gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli (16%), Klebsiella spp (11%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Enterobacter spp (4%), and others (20%) including Serratia marcescens. Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant gram-positive bacteria (12%)., Conclusions: PVCR-BSI rates in INICC ICUs were much higher than rates published from industrialized countries. Infection prevention programs must be implemented to reduce the incidence of PVCR-BSIs in resource-limited countries.

Background: We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2012 to December 2017 in 523 intensive care units (ICUs) in 45 countries from Latin America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific., Methods: During the 6-year study period, prospective data from 532,483 ICU patients hospitalized in 242 hospitals, for an aggregate of 2,197,304 patient days, were collected through the INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI) were applied., Results: Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAI rates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled central line-associated bloodstream infection rate was higher (5.05 vs 0.8 per 1,000 central line-days); the ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was also higher (14.1 vs 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days,), as well as the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (5.1 vs 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days). From blood cultures samples, frequencies of resistance, such as of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin-tazobactam (33.0% vs 18.3%), were also higher., Conclusions: Despite a significant trend toward the reduction in INICC ICUs, DA-HAI rates are still much higher compared with CDC-NHSN's ICUs representing the developed world. It is INICC's main goal to provide basic and cost-effective resources, through the INICC Surveillance Online System to tackle the burden of DA-HAIs effectively., (Copyright © 2019 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The present article describes retrospectively a case of a patient with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) who presented recurrent Candida albicans infection since he was 6 months old. We obtained 16 isolates recovered during a 4-year period. Our purpose was to determinate the susceptibility, genotyping, and the pathogenicity profile in all the isolates., Methods: Sixteen C. albicans were isolated from a 25-year-old male with several recurrent fungal infections admitted to Hospital. The isolates were recovered during 4 years from a different anatomical origin. We typified them by multilocus sequence typing, also we evaluated susceptibility to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B by microdilution method and we also test the pathogenic capacity in the Galleria mellonella model., Results: Genotyping of all clinical isolates showed the persistence of the same diploid sequence type (DST). Isolates changed their susceptibility profile over time, but there were no significant statistical differences in pathogenicity., Conclusion: Herein, a persistent clonal isolates of C. albicans (DST 918) in a patient with CMC, showed changes in its susceptibility profile after several antifungal treatments acquiring gradual resistance to the azole drugs, which did not affect their pathogenicity., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Global Infectious Diseases.)

Background: Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are under-represented in reports on the burden of antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to quantify the clinical effect of carbapenem resistance on mortality and length of hospital stay among inpatients in LMICs with a bloodstream infection due to Enterobacteriaceae., Methods: The PANORAMA study was a multinational prospective cohort study at tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, India, Lebanon, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Vietnam, recruiting consecutively diagnosed patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (CSE) and carbapenem-resistant Entero-bacteriaceae (CRE) bloodstream infections. We excluded patients who had previously been enrolled in the study and those not treated with curative intent at the time of bloodstream infection onset. There were no age restrictions. Central laboratories in India and the UK did confirmatory testing and molecular characterisation, including strain typing. We applied proportional subdistribution hazard models with inverse probability weighting to estimate the effect of carbapenem resistance on probability of discharge alive and in-hospital death, and multistate modelling for excess length of stay in hospital. All patients were included in the analysis., Findings: Between Aug 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015, we recruited 297 patients from 16 sites in ten countries: 174 with CSE bloodstream infection and 123 with CRE bloodstream infection. Median age was 46 years (IQR 15-61). Crude mortality was 20% (35 of 174 patients) for patients with CSE bloodstream infection and 35% (43 of 123 patients) for patients with CRE bloodstream infection. Carbapenem resistance was associated with an increased length of hospital stay (3·7 days, 95% CI 0·3-6·9), increased probability of in-hospital mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 1·75, 95% CI 1·04-2·94), and decreased probability of discharge alive (0·61, 0·45-0·83). Multilocus sequence typing showed various clades, with marginal overlap between strains in the CRE and CSE clades., Interpretation: Carbapenem resistance is associated with increased length of hospital stay and mortality in patients with bloodstream infections in LMICs. These data will inform global estimates of the burden of antimicrobial resistance and reinforce the need for better strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat CRE infections in LMICs., Funding: bioMérieux., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Data about the performance of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry against cryptic Candida species are limited. According to our findings within the C. parapsilosis species complex, microbiologists should be aware that the choice of the instrument is critical for accurate species identification due to the risk of misidentification in the clinical setting., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a multidimensional infection control approach and the use of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Surveillance Online System on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates from June 2003-April 2010., Methods: We conducted a prospective, before-after surveillance study of 2,564 patients hospitalized in 4 adult intensive care units (ICUs) and 424 patients in 2 pediatric ICUs of 4 hospitals in 2 cities of Colombia. During baseline, we performed outcome surveillance of CLABSI applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network definitions. During intervention, we implemented the INICC multidimensional approach and the ISOS, which included a bundle of infection prevention practice interventions, education, outcome surveillance, process surveillance, feedback on CLABSI rates and consequences, and performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to estimate the effect of the intervention on the CLABSI rate., Results: The baseline rate of 12.9 CLABSIs per 1,000 central line (CL) days, with 3,032 CL days and 39 CLABSIs, was reduced to 3.5 CLABSIs per 1,000 CL days, with 3,686 CL days and 13 CLABSIs, accounting for a 73% CLABSI rate reduction (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.52; P=.002)., Conclusions: Implementing the INICC multidimensional infection control approach for CLABSI prevention was associated with a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate of ICUs of Colombia., (Copyright © 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)