Search

AIM/BACKGROUND: Infection control measures are disrupted due to the large number of patients admitted in a very short time, in the early post-earthquake period. Inter-hospital or intra-hospital transfers can cause the spread of resistant bacteria (1). We reported the possible outbreak and its prevention caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) strains carried by infants transferred from another unit to Kayseri City Hospital NICU after the earthquake in Turkey. METHODS: Screening cultures (rectal swab) were obtained from infants on admission and patients were kept in cantact isolation. VRE isolated from 13 transferred patients, 3 current patients and 2 environmental samples were confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS (BRUKER, Microflex) and analyzed using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) Method and CHEF-DR III system (Bio-RadLaboratories, Belgium). RESULTS: PFGE identified 18 isolates in 8 groups. Isolates 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13 and 18 in the 8th group were clonally related. Isolates 9, 11 and 17 in the 3rd group and isolates 12, 14 and 16 in the 1st group are clonally related. Isolates 1, 3, 8, 10 and 15 were not associated with any sample and were considered as unique. Isolates 9, 11 and 17 in one of the other two groups and isolates 12, 14 and 16 in the last group were clonally related (Figure 1). Rectal swab culture for screening and contact isolation on admission, prevented a possible VRE outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: After major disasters, it is important to comply with infection control measures as much as possible to prevent outbreaks and secondary damage.

Abstract Background Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) was the fastest growing pathogen in Europe in 2022 (+ 21%) but its clinical relevance is still unclear. We aim to identify risk factors for acquired VRE rectal colonization in hematological patients and evaluate the clinical impact of VRE colonization on subsequent infection, and 30- and 90-day overall mortality rates, compared to a matched control group. Methods A retrospective, single center, case–control matched study (ratio 1:1) was conducted in a hematological department from January 2017 to December 2020. Case patients with nosocomial isolation of VRE from rectal swab screening (≥ 48 h) were matched to controls by age, sex, ethnicity, and hematologic disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression compared risk factors for colonization. Results A total of 83 cases were matched with 83 controls. Risk factors for VRE colonization were febrile neutropenia, bone marrow transplant, central venous catheter, bedsores, reduced mobility, altered bowel habits, cachexia, previous hospitalization and antibiotic treatments before and during hospitalization. VRE bacteraemia and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurred more frequently among cases without any impact on 30 and 90-days overall mortality. Vancomycin administration and altered bowel habits were the only independent risk factors for VRE colonization at multivariate analysis (OR: 3.53 and 3.1; respectively). Conclusions Antimicrobial stewardship strategies to reduce inappropriate Gram-positive coverage in hematological patients is urgently required, as independent risk factors for VRE nosocomial colonization identified in this study include any use of vancomycin and altered bowel habits. VRE colonization and infection did not influence 30- and 90-day mortality. There was a strong correlation between CDI and VRE, which deserves further investigation to target new therapeutic approaches.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens has emerged as a challenge in health care settings resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to describe the trends and burden of AMR in a tertiary care hospital. A retrospective observational study was undertaken from October 2018 to March 2021 in a clinical microbiology laboratory where local priority pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns were analyzed. Organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Out of 9948 isolates, Enterobacteriaceae (58%) were mostly isolated followed by Staphylococci (18.6%), Non-fermenting gram negative bacilli (NFGNB) (13.7%), and Enterococci (8.4%) respectively. Highest isolation was from inpatient department (61.3%); 31.5% from outpatient, and 7.2 % from intensive care units. Klebsiella pneumoniae (26.9%) was most isolated organism, mostly from respiratory samples; Escherichia coli was isolated mostly from urine (40.7%). Almost half of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates were extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers while >50% of Enterobacteriaceae and NFGNB isolates were resistant to one or more Carbapenems. Frequency of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 44.7% , Vancomycin resistant Enterococci was 1.2%. A rising trend of resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems along with fluoroquinolones was observed. Our study has witnessed a high prevalence of Gram negative pathogens with increasing resistance to commonly applied antimicrobials during the surveillance period which can act as a guiding tool in devising local antimicrobial priorities, antibiotic policy, and proper antimicrobial prescribing practices.

Background: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) was the fastest growing pathogen in Europe in 2022 (+ 21%) but its clinical relevance is still unclear. We aim to identify risk factors for acquired VRE rectal colonization in hematological patients and evaluate the clinical impact of VRE colonization on subsequent infection, and 30- and 90-day overall mortality rates, compared to a matched control group. Methods: A retrospective, single center, case–control matched study (ratio 1:1) was conducted in a hematological department from January 2017 to December 2020. Case patients with nosocomial isolation of VRE from rectal swab screening (≥ 48 h) were matched to controls by age, sex, ethnicity, and hematologic disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression compared risk factors for colonization. Results: A total of 83 cases were matched with 83 controls. Risk factors for VRE colonization were febrile neutropenia, bone marrow transplant, central venous catheter, bedsores, reduced mobility, altered bowel habits, cachexia, previous hospitalization and antibiotic treatments before and during hospitalization. VRE bacteraemia and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurred more frequently among cases without any impact on 30 and 90-days overall mortality. Vancomycin administration and altered bowel habits were the only independent risk factors for VRE colonization at multivariate analysis (OR: 3.53 and 3.1; respectively). Conclusions: Antimicrobial stewardship strategies to reduce inappropriate Gram-positive coverage in hematological patients is urgently required, as independent risk factors for VRE nosocomial colonization identified in this study include any use of vancomycin and altered bowel habits. VRE colonization and infection did not influence 30- and 90-day mortality. There was a strong correlation between CDI and VRE, which deserves further investigation to target new therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens has emerged as a challenge in health care settings resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to describe the trends and burden of AMR in a tertiary care hospital. A retrospective observational study was undertaken from October 2018 to March 2021 in a clinical microbiology laboratory where local priority pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns were analyzed. Organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Out of 9948 isolates, Enterobacteriaceae (58%) were mostly isolated followed by Staphylococci (18.6%), Non-fermenting gram negative bacilli (NFGNB) (13.7%), and Enterococci (8.4%) respectively. Highest isolation was from inpatient department (61.3%); 31.5% from outpatient, and 7.2 % from intensive care units. Klebsiella pneumoniae (26.9%) was most isolated organism, mostly from respiratory samples; Escherichia coli was isolated mostly from urine (40.7%). Almost half of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates were extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers while >50% of Enterobacteriaceae and NFGNB isolates were resistant to one or more Carbapenems. Frequency of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 44.7%, Vancomycin resistant Enterococci was 1.2%. A rising trend of resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems along with fluoroquinolones was observed. Our study has witnessed a high prevalence of Gram negative pathogens with increasing resistance to commonly applied antimicrobials during the surveillance period which can act as a guiding tool in devising local antimicrobial priorities, antibiotic policy, and proper antimicrobial prescribing practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common causes of infections worldwide and can be caused by numerous uropathogens. Enterococci are Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic commensal organisms of the gastrointestinal tract that are known uropathogens. Enterococcus spp. has become a leading cause of healthcare associated infections, ranging from endocarditis to UTIs. In recent years, there has been an increase in multidrug resistance due to antibiotic misuse, especially in enterococci. Additionally, infections due to enterococci pose a unique challenge due to their ability to survive in extreme environments, intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, and genomic malleability. Overall, this review aims to highlight the pathogenicity, epidemiology, and treatment recommendations (according to the most recent guidelines) of enterococci. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT A high daptomycin dose has been suggested for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREf) infections. However, even a 12 mg/kg daptomycin dose might be insufficient for treating VREf with high daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Additionally, animal pharmacodynamic and infection models to confirm the efficacy of 12 mg/kg daptomycin are lacking. Male Wistar rats were used for pharmacokinetic profiling and for the development of an infective endocarditis (IE) model. Daptomycin-susceptible dose-dependent VREf (DSE) (MIC of 0.5 mg/L) and daptomycin nonsusceptible VREf (DNSE) (MIC of 8 mg/L) were used for the IE models. The bacterial load of vegetation was the primary outcome and was evaluated after 3 days of daptomycin treatment. Daptomycin administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at 45 and 90 mg/kg, which corresponded to maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) of 122.6 mg/L and 178.5 mg/L, respectively, was equivalent to doses of 8 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg, respectively, in humans. The Cmax/MIC value was correlated with the bacterial load of vegetation after treatment (r = −0.88, P < 0.001). The 90 mg/kg s.c. group showed a significantly lower bacterial load of vegetation (log10 CFU/g) than the 45 mg/kg s.c. group against DSE (0 versus 4.75, P < 0.001) and DNSE (5.12 versus 6.98, P = 0.002). The 90 mg/kg s.c. group did not sterilize the vegetation against DNSE. Although the human equivalent dose of 12 mg/kg daptomycin was more effective than the smaller dose in reducing the bacterial load in DSE and DNSE IE, the dose could not sterilize the vegetation during a DNSE treatment. Further treatment strategies by which to manage severe VREf infections, especially at high daptomycin MICs, are urgently needed. IMPORTANCE Using a rat IE model with pharmacokinetic analysis, the treatment response of VREf IE was found to be daptomycin dose-dependent, presented as Cmax/MIC or as the 24 h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0–24)/MIC. Daptomycin 90 mg/kg s.c. significantly reduced the bacterial load against DSE and DNSE. It also showed significant activity against DSE and DNSE, compared to 45 mg/kg s.c. Although daptomycin 90 mg/kg can eradicate the bacterial load after 3 days of treatment against DSE, eradication cannot be achieved with 90 mg/kg daptomycin against DNSE.

Introduction: Tigecycline is a potential therapeutic agent for multidrug resistant gram positive and gram negative organisms. The clinical efficacy of synergic combination of daptomycin with betalactam antibiotics have been described against various species of Enterococcus isolates. Aim: To detect the in-vitro activity of tigecycline and daptomycin against Enterococcus species and to compare their antimicrobial activity by Vitek 2 automated system. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar (VMKV) Medical College and Hospitals, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. Isolates of Enterococcus obtained over a period of two years from March 2016 - March 2018 from various clinical samples were identified by standard biochemical method and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was determined. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of tigecycline and daptomycin was determined by Vitek 2 automated system. Analysis of data was done by using frequency distribution and percentage. Results: Out of 211 Enterococcus isolates studied, 23 (10.90%) isolates showed decreased susceptibility to daptomycin with MIC of ≥8 μg/mL. All isolates showed 100% susceptibility to tigecycline. Conclusion: The present study showed potent antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against various species of Enterococcus. Decreased susceptibility to daptomycin has been observed among the study isolates. Further clinical investigations are required to know the potential benefits of these agents in therapy.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common causes of infections worldwide and can be caused by numerous uropathogens. Enterococci are Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic commensal organisms of the gastrointestinal tract that are known uropathogens. Enterococcus spp. has become a leading cause of healthcare associated infections, ranging from endocarditis to UTIs. In recent years, there has been an increase in multidrug resistance due to antibiotic misuse, especially in enterococci. Additionally, infections due to enterococci pose a unique challenge due to their ability to survive in extreme environments, intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, and genomic malleability. Overall, this review aims to highlight the pathogenicity, epidemiology, and treatment recommendations (according to the most recent guidelines) of enterococci.

Aims: The objective of this study was to isolate multifunctional bacteriocin‐producing strains; to characterize the expressed bacteriocin for the control of Listeria monocytogenes and vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus; to evaluate the safety of studied strains; and to explore their antifungal activity. Methods and Results: Two Pediococcus strains were isolated from silage samples obtained from an organic farm in Belogradchik, Bulgaria. The strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing analysis and characterized as bacteriocins producers. Strong antimicrobial activity was detected against more than 74 different strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 27 different vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus strains. In addition, studied strains were able to inhibit the growth of strains of Alternaria alternate, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium expansum. Some aspects of the antimicrobial mode of action were evaluated, including killing curves and aggregation properties. Both strains generated positive PCR results for the presence of pediocin PA‐1, but not for other bacteriocins evaluated in this screening process. Metabolomic analysis of the cell‐free supernatants from both strains was performed in order to explain the observed antifungal activity against different moulds. According to PCA and PLS‐DA score plot, P. acidilactici ST3522BG and P. pentosaceus ST3633BG were clearly clustered from control (MRS). Increases in the production of benzoic acid, 2‐hydroxyisocaproic acid, β‐phenyl‐lactic acid, α‐hydroxybutyric acid and 1,3‐butanediol were recorded, these metabolites were previously described as antifungal. Conclusions: Pediococcus acidilactici ST3522BG and P. pentosaceus ST3633BG were evaluated as producing bacteriocin strains with high specificity against Listeria and vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus species. In addition, both investigated Pediococcus strains were evaluated as producer of effective antifungal metabolites with potential for the inhibition of mycotoxin‐producing moulds. Significance and Impact of the Study: To the best of our knowledge, this report is a pioneer in the evaluation of Pediococcus strains isolated from silage with highly specific bacteriocinogenic antimicrobial activity against Listeria spp. and vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus spp., and antifungal activity against mycotoxin‐producing moulds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveScreening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in high-risk patients is a legislative mandate in 9 US states and has been adopted by many hospitals. Definitions of high risk differ among hospitals and state laws. A systematic evaluation of factors associated with colonization is lacking. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess factors associated with MRSA colonization at hospital admission.DesignWe searched MEDLINE from 1966 to 2012 for articles comparing MRSA colonized and noncolonized patients on hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument. Meta-analyses were performed to identify factors associated with MRSA colonization.ResultsWe reviewed 4,381 abstracts; 29 articles met inclusion criteria (n = 76,913 patients). MRSA colonization at hospital admission was associated with recent prior hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-4.7]; P < .01), nursing home exposure (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 2.3-6.3]; P < .01), and history of exposure to healthcare-associated pathogens (MRSA carriage: OR, 8.0 [95% CI, 4.2-15.1]; Clostridium difficile infection: OR, 3.4 [95% CI, 2.2-5.3]; vancomycin-resistant Enterococci carriage: OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.5-4.0]; P < .01 for all). Select comorbidities were associated with MRSA colonization (congestive heart failure, diabetes, pulmonary disease, immunosuppression, and renal failure; P < .01 for all), while others were not (human immunodeficiency virus, cirrhosis, and malignancy). ICU admission was not associated with an increased risk of MRSA colonization (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.6-1.8]; P = .87).ConclusionsMRSA colonization on hospital admission was associated with healthcare contact, previous healthcare-associated pathogens, and select comorbid conditions. ICU admission was not associated with MRSA colonization, although this is commonly used in state mandates for MRSA screening. Infection prevention programs utilizing targeted MRSA screening may consider our results to define patients likely to have MRSA colonization.

BackgroundBecause patients can remain colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) for long periods of time, VRE may spread from one health care facility to another.MethodsUsing the Regional Healthcare Ecosystem Analyst, an agent-based model of patient flow among all Orange County, California, hospitals and communities, we quantified the degree and speed at which changes in VRE colonization prevalence in a hospital may affect prevalence in other Orange County hospitals.ResultsA sustained 10% increase in VRE colonization prevalence in any 1 hospital caused a 2.8% (none to 62%) average relative increase in VRE prevalence in all other hospitals. Effects took from 1.5 to >10 years to fully manifest. Larger hospitals tended to have greater affect on other hospitals.ConclusionsWhen monitoring and controlling VRE, decision makers may want to account for regional effects. Knowing a hospital's connections with other health care facilities via patient sharing can help determine which hospitals to include in a surveillance or control program.

BackgroundAdmission to intensive care unit rooms previously occupied by carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enteroccoci (VRE) had been found to confer a 40% increased risk of acquisition, presumably through environmental contamination. Subsequently, a cleaning intervention was shown to reduce MRSA and VRE room contamination. We now evaluate the effect of this intervention on the risk of acquiring MRSA and VRE from prior room occupants.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to 10 intensive care units at a 750-bed academic medical center during the enhanced cleaning intervention (from September 1, 2006, through April 30, 2008; n = 9449) vs baseline (from September 1, 2003, through April 30, 2005; n = 8203) periods. The intervention consisted of targeted feedback using a black-light marker, cleaning cloths saturated with disinfectant via bucket immersion, and increased education regarding the importance of repeated bucket immersion during cleaning. Intensive care units included medical, cardiac, burn/trauma, general surgery, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, and neurosurgery units. We calculated the number of room stays involving the potential for MRSA and VRE acquisition and then assessed the frequency at which eligible patients were exposed to rooms in which the prior occupants had MRSA-positive or VRE-positive status.ResultsAcquisition of MRSA and VRE was lowered from 3.0% to 1.5% for MRSA and from 3.0% to 2.2% for VRE (P < .001 for both). Patients in rooms previously occupied by MRSA carriers had an increased risk of acquisition during the baseline (3.9% vs 2.9%, P = .03) but not the intervention (1.5% vs 1.5%, P = .79) period. In contrast, patients in rooms previously occupied by VRE carriers had an increased risk of acquisition during the baseline (4.5% vs 2.8%, P = .001) and intervention (3.5% vs 2.0%, P < .001) periods.ConclusionsEnhanced intensive care unit cleaning using the intervention methods may reduce MRSA and VRE transmission. It may also eliminate the risk of MRSA acquisition due to an MRSA-positive prior room occupant.

Postdischarge risks of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infection among carriers are unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 199 patients newly detected as VRE carriers. Fifteen patients (8%) developed 27 VRE infections in the 18 months after detection. Among 10 postdischarge infections, 2 involved bacteremia and 3 resulted in readmission.

Introduction: Tigecycline is a potential therapeutic agent for multidrug resistant gram positive and gram negative organisms. The clinical efficacy of synergic combination of daptomycin with betalactam antibiotics have been described against various species of Enterococcus isolates. Aim: To detect the in-vitro activity of tigecycline and daptomycin against Enterococcus species and to compare their antimicrobial activity by Vitek 2 automated system. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission's Kirupananda Variyar (VMKV) Medical College and Hospitals, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. Isolates of Enterococcus obtained over a period of two years from March 2016 - March 2018 from various clinical samples were identified by standard biochemical method and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was determined. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of tigecycline and daptomycin was determined by Vitek 2 automated system. Analysis of data was done by using frequency distribution and percentage. Results: Out of 211 Enterococcus isolates studied, 23 (10.90%) isolates showed decreased susceptibility to daptomycin with MIC of =8 µg/mL. All isolates showed 100% susceptibility to tigecycline. Conclusion: The present study showed potent antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against various species of Enterococcus. Decreased susceptibility to daptomycin has been observed among the study isolates. Further clinical investigations are required to know the potential benefits of these agents in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Ontario, Canada, since 2012, some hospitals discontinued contact precautions for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Between 2009 and 2018, there was an associated rise in VRE bloodstream infections in hospitals where contact precautions were discontinued but not in hospitals that maintained contact precautions. These data suggest contact precautions are important for hospital VRE control programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of ANKEM Antibiyotik & Kemoterapi Dergisi is the property of ANKEM Antibiyotik & Kemoterapi Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The assessment of MDRO infection and colonization should include the identification of known carriers, the detection of hospital-specific and healthcare-associated acquisition, an estimation of the burden of serious infection, an understanding of the reservoir affecting the transmission of MDROs, and an evaluation of the effect of intervention. Several strategies can be used to obtain data that aid in this assessment. We have defined and categorized the recommended metrics for each of these aspects of measuring MDRO infection and colonization, for use by healthcare facilities. © 2008 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the adequacy of discharge room cleaning and the impact of a cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) on environmental surfaces in intensive care unit (ICU) rooms.DesignProspective environmental study.Setting and sampleConvenience sample of ICU rooms in an academic hospital. METHODS AND INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of (1) a change from the use of pour bottles to bucket immersion for applying disinfectant to cleaning cloths, (2) an educational campaign, and (3) feedback regarding adequacy of discharge cleaning. Cleaning of 15 surfaces was evaluated by inspecting for removal of a preapplied mark, visible only with an ultraviolet lamp ("black light"). Six surfaces were cultured for MRSA or VRE contamination. Outcomes of mark removal and culture positivity were evaluated by chi(2) testing and generalized linear mixed models, clustering by room.ResultsThe black-light mark was removed from 44% of surfaces at baseline, compared with 71% during the intervention (P < .001). The intervention increased the likelihood of removal of black-light marks after discharge cleaning (odds ratio, 4.4; P < .001), controlling for ICU type (medical vs surgical) and type of surface. The intervention reduced the likelihood of an environmental culture positive for MRSA or VRE (proportion of cultures positive, 45% at baseline vs 27% during the intervention; adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; P = .02). Broad, flat surfaces were more likely to be cleaned than were doorknobs and sink or toilet handles.ConclusionsIncreasing the volume of disinfectant applied to environmental surfaces, providing education for Environmental Services staff, and instituting feedback with a black-light marker improved cleaning and reduced the frequency of MRSA and VRE contamination.

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating healthcare-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, APIC and SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) SHEA and APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) APIC and SHEA welcome efforts by healthcare consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections. (4) SHEA and APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) APIC and SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.

BackgroundAs infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) increases in hospitals, knowledge about VRE reservoirs and improved accuracy of epidemiologic measures are needed. Many assessments underestimate incidence by including prevalent carriers in at-risk populations. Routine surveillance cultures can substantially improve prevalence and incidence estimates, and assessing the range of improvement across diverse units is important.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using accurate at-risk populations to evaluate the range of benefit of admission and weekly surveillance cultures in detecting unrecognized VRE in 14 patient-care units.ResultsWe assessed 165 unit-months. The admission prevalence of VRE was 2.2%-27.2%, with admission surveillance providing 2.2-17-fold increased detection. Medical units were significantly more likely to admit VRE carriers than were surgical units. Monthly incidence was 0.8%-9.7%, with weekly surveillance providing 3.3-15.4-fold increased detection. The common practice of reporting incidence using the total number of patients, rather than patients at risk, underestimated incidence by one-third. Overall, routine surveillance prevented the misclassification of 43.0% (unit range, 0%-85.7%) of "incident" carriers on the basis of clinical cultures alone and increased VRE precaution days by 2.4-fold (unit range, 2.0-2.6-fold).ConclusionsRoutine surveillance markedly increases the detection of VRE, despite variability across patient-care units. Correct denominators prevent the substantial underestimation of incidence.

BackgroundEnvironmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) occurs during the care of patients harboring these organisms and may increase the risk of transmission to subsequent room occupants.MethodsTwenty-month retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to 8 intensive care units performing routine admission and weekly screening for MRSA and VRE. We assessed the relative odds of acquisition among patients admitted to rooms in which the most recent occupants were MRSA positive or VRE positive, compared with patients admitted to other rooms.ResultsOf 11 528 intensive care unit room stays, 10 151 occupants were eligible to acquire MRSA, and 10 349 were eligible to acquire VRE. Among patients whose prior room occupant was MRSA positive, 3.9% acquired MRSA, compared with 2.9% of patients whose prior room occupant was MRSA negative (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; P = .04). VRE, Among patients whose prior room occupant was VRE positive, these values were 4.5% and 2.8% respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; P = .02). These excess risks accounted for 5.1% of all incident MRSA cases and 6.8% of all incident VRE cases, with a population attributable risk among exposed patients of less than 2% for either organism. Acquisition was significantly associated with longer post-intensive care unit length of stay.ConclusionsAdmission to a room previously occupied by an MRSA-positive patient or a VRE-positive patient significantly increased the odds of acquisition for MRSA and VRE. However, this route of transmission was a minor contributor to overall transmission. The effect of current cleaning practices in reducing the risk to the observed levels and the potential for further reduction are unknown.

Aim: Enterococci are located in the intestinal flora of animals and humans and have become a major cause of healthcare-associated infections over the years. In this study, related factors were investigated for the isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from rectal swab specimens of patients admitted to the internal medicine service. Material and Methods: TRectal swab samples were obtained from 316 patients. VITEK-2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) automated system was used for identification of enterococci. Vancomycin susceptibility was studied by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Resistant strains were confirmed by vancomycin E-test (bioMerieux). Results: VRE was growth in 70 (22.2%) of 316 patients included in the study. According to the univariate analysis results which comparing patients who were colonized with VRE to the control group; These were found, the duration of hospitalization for VRE colonized patients was significantly longer, the usage of glycopeptide and metronidazole increased the VRE colonization and VRE colonized patients were found to have more parenteral feeding. It was determined that hemoglobin, thyroxine and albumin values of patients colonized with VRE were lower. According to the logistic regression analysis, patients with VRE colonization had a higher rate of history in the intensive care unit and higher gamma glutamyl transferase value. Conclusion: It was determined that the hospitalization history in intensive care unit is a risk factor for VRE colonization and especially in patients transported from intensive care unit. Patients colonized with VRE have been found to have higher GGT values and new research on this topic is considered to be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) is now one of the leading causes of nosocomial infections in the United States. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk of VRE colonization and infection. VRE has emerged as a major cause of bacteremia in this population, raising important clinical questions regarding the role and impact of VRE colonization and infection in HSCT outcomes as well as the optimal means of prevention and treatment. We review here the published literature and scientific advances addressing these thorny issues and provide a rational framework for their approach.

Objective: To investigate the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE) infection in intensive care unit (ICU) of department of neurosurgery, and to provide reference for clinical prevention and control. Methods: A total of 420 patients, who underwent surgery in the ICU of department of neurosurgery in Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2014 to January 2016, were chosen as subjects. The application of antibiotics before infection in the pa­tients with VRE infection was compared, and univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of VRE infection to propose the prevention and control measures. Results: Among the 420 inpatients in ICU, there were 58 cases of VRE infection, accounted for 13.81%. The most common antibiotics used before VRE infection was three generation cephalosporin, accounted for 37.93%, and four generation cephalosporin was least, accounted for 6.90%. Single factor and Logistic regression analysis showed that the ICU hospitalization times⩾ 14 d, indwelling catheters⩾ 14 d, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score<8 and patients infected by VRE near­by were the risk factors of VRE infection(P<0.05). Conclusion: The most common antibiotics used before VRE infection is three genera­tion cephalosporin. ICU hospitalization times⩾ 14 d, indwelling catheters⩾ 14 d, GCS score<8 and patients infected by VRE nearby are the risk factors of VRE infection. Rational use of antibiotics and taking corresponding prevention and control measures are necessary in the clinical practice to reduce the incidence of VRE infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daptomycin is typically the treatment of choice for vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients with hematological malignancies, but increasingly daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE are being reported. We reviewed our experience with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI among patients with hematological malignancies. We compared risk factors and outcomes of 20 patients with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI (case patients) with 40 matched control patients with daptomycin susceptible VRE BSI. Case patients had more complications (6/20 vs. 2/40, p=.013); all-cause mortality was similar in both groups. By multivariable analysis, only prior daptomycin exposure within 90 days was significantly associated with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI (odds ratio 26.71; p<.0001). In 25% of case patients, all of whose VRE isolates had an initial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 μg/mL, nonsusceptibility developed during treatment, raising the question of whether higher doses of daptomycin should be used for VRE BSI in hematology patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, specific binding affinity between vancomycin (VAN) conjugated 40-50 nm gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) implemented on a sensor chip and pentapeptide mimicking pathogenic VAN resistant Enterococcus (VRE) wall membrane was employed as nanosensor format based on localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). Two pentapeptides, which were also anchored to 5 nm Au NPs, having two different terminal sequences of d-Ala- d-Ala and d-Ala- d-Lac respectively were compared in specific binding affinity toward the VAN conjugated nanosensor. Binding affinity difference identified by the LSPR characteristic in the nanosensor was shown in absorbance intensity and absorption wavelength shift between the two different terminal pentapeptides. The absorbance intensity clearly indicated that the pentapeptide having terminal d-Ala- d-Lac showed less affinity toward VAN conjugated nanosensor chip than that having terminal d-Ala- d-Ala. It indicates that the VRE itself has relatively weak binding strength towards the VAN, which may be used as a probe molecule for the VRE. Therefore, in order to design a VRE sensor using the VAN affinity, an indirect LSPR method can be devised instead of direct LSPR method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]