Search

To investigate the relative effect of disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) loss on visual function in diabetic macular ischemia (DMI).Prospective cross-sectional observational study.Patients with stable treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema were recruited at the Moorfields Eye Hospital from December 2019 to November 2021. The main inclusion criteria were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 40 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/160) with OCT angiography (OCTA) evidence of DMI in ≥ 1 eye.Each eligible eye of the recruited patients was assessed for BCVA, OCT, and OCTA metrics. The prespecified OCT parameters were DRIL and subfoveal EZ loss. Generalized estimating equations were used.The frequency of DRIL and EZ loss, their relative contributions to vision loss, and their associations with microvascular alterations were evaluated.A total of 125 eyes of 86 patients with PDR were enrolled; 104 (83%) eyes had a BCVA of ≥ 70 letters. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers was more prevalent than EZ loss (46% [58 eyes] vs. 19% [24 eyes]). On average, the presence of DRIL had a more pronounced impact on vision, retinal thickness, and microvascular parameters than EZ loss. After multivariable adjustment, the odds of coexisting DRIL increased by 12% with every letter decrease in BCVA; however, there was no statistically significant association of subfoveal EZ loss with BCVA. In eyes with DRIL in the absence of EZ loss, the BCVA declined significantly by 6.67 letters compared with eyes with no DRIL nor EZ loss (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.92 to -3.41; P0.001). However, if DRIL and EZ loss coexisted, the resultant BCVA was 13.22 letters less than eyes without these structural abnormalities (95% CI, -18.85 to -7.59; P0.001).In patients with DMI with a Snellen visual acuity of 20/160 or better, eyes with DRIL were associated with more visual function loss and retinal blood circulation alterations than those with subfoveal EZ loss only.

Patients diagnosed with exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration are commonly treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, response to treatment is heterogeneous, without a clinical explanation. Predicting suboptimal response at baseline will enable more efficient clinical trial designs for novel, future interventions and facilitate individualised therapies. In this multicentre study, we trained a multi-modal artificial intelligence (AI) system to identify suboptimal responders to the loading-phase of the anti-VEGF agent aflibercept from baseline characteristics. We collected clinical features and optical coherence tomography scans from 1720 eyes of 1612 patients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated our AI system as a patient selection method by emulating hypothetical clinical trials of different sizes based on our test set. Our method detected up to 57.6% more suboptimal responders than random selection, and up to 24.2% more than any alternative selection criteria tested. Applying this method to the entry process of candidates into randomised controlled trials may contribute to the success of such trials and further inform personalised care.

Geographic atrophy (GA) is currently an untreatable condition. Emerging evidence from recent clinical trials show that anti-complement therapy may be a successful treatment option. However, several trials in this therapy area have failed as well. This raises several questions. Firstly, does complement therapy work for all patients with GA? Secondly, is GA one disease? Can we assume that these failed clinical trials are due to ineffective interventions or are they due to flawed clinical trial designs, heterogeneity in GA progression rates or differences in study cohorts? In this article we try to answer these questions by providing an overview of the challenges of designing and interpreting outcomes of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in GA. These include differing inclusion-exclusion criteria, heterogeneous progression rates of the disease, outcome choices and confounders.摘要: 地图样萎缩 (Geographic atrophy, GA) 是一种目前尚无法治愈的疾病。最近来自临床试验的新兴证据表明, 抗补体治疗可能成为一种有效的治疗方式。然而, 基于该治疗方式的几项试验都失败了。这就提出了几个问题。首先, 补体治疗是否适用于所有GA患者? 其次, GA是一种疾病吗? 我们是否可以提出几个假设: 这些临床试验失败是因为干预措施无效还是因为临床试验设计有缺陷? GA进展率是否具有异质性或研究队列内是否存在差异? 在本文中, 我们总结了这些GA随机对照试验 (RCT) 在试验设计和结果解读中面临的挑战, 其中包括不同的纳入-排除标准、疾病的异质性进展率、结局选择和混杂因素, 并试图以此来回答这些问题。.

Patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration are commonly treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, response to treatment is heterogeneous, without a clinical explanation. Predicting suboptimal response at baseline will enable more efficient clinical trial designs for novel, future interventions and facilitate individualised therapies. In this multicentre study, we trained a multi-modal artificial intelligence (AI) system to identify suboptimal responders to the loading-phase of the anti-VEGF agent, aflibercept from baseline characteristics. We collected clinical features and optical coherence tomography scans from 1720 eyes of 1612 patients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated our AI system as a patient selection method by emulating hypothetical clinical trials of different sizes based on our test set. Our method detected up to 57.6% more suboptimal responders than random selection, and up to 24.2% more than any alternative selection criteria tested. Applying this method to the entry process of candidates into randomised controlled trials may contribute to the success of such trials and further inform personalised care.

No abstract available.

Aims To estimate the incidence of early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) level 47 and 53 and progression to treatment with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative DR (PDR). Methods Log-linear regression was used to estimate the incidence of level 47–53 or worse for 33,009 people with diabetes (PWD) in Gloucestershire during 2013–2016 by calendar year and diabetes type, based on the first recording. Progression was analysed in Gloucestershire and Bristol with a parametric survival analysis examining the association of baseline and time-varying demographic and clinical factors on time to PRP after the first recording of level 47–53. Results Incidence decreased from 0.57 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.48–0.67) per 100 PWD in 2013 to 0.35 (95% CI 0.29–0.43) in 2016 (p 1c were associated with an increase in the risk of initiating PRP (hazard ratio 3.14 (95% CI: 1.60–6.15) and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06–1.38 per 10 mmol/mol) respectively). Conclusion This study provides additional understanding of this population and shows that a high proportion of patients with ETDRS levels 47–53 need to be monitored as they are at high risk of progressing to PDR.

Purpose The increasing diabetes prevalence and advent of new treatments for its major visual-threatening complications (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR]), which require frequent life-long follow-up, have increased hospital demands markedly. Subsequent delays in patient's evaluation and treatment are causing sight loss. Strategies to increase capacity are needed urgently. The retinopathy (EMERALD) study tested diagnostic accuracy, acceptability, and costs of a new health care pathway for people with previously treated DME or PDR. Design Prospective, multicenter, case-referent, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study undertaken in 13 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants Adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes previously successfully treated DME or PDR who, at the time of enrollment, had active or inactive disease. Methods A new health care pathway entailing multimodal imaging (spectral-domain OCT for DME, and 7-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] and ultra-widefield [UWF] fundus images for PDR) interpreted by trained nonmedical staff (ophthalmic graders) to detect reactivation of disease was compared with the current standard care (face-to-face examination by ophthalmologists). Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome: sensitivity of the new pathway. Secondary outcomes: specificity; agreement between pathways; costs; acceptability; proportions requiring subsequent ophthalmologist assessment, unable to undergo imaging, and with inadequate images or indeterminate findings. Results The new pathway showed sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%–99%) and specificity of 31% (95% CI, 23%–40%) to detect DME. For PDR, sensitivity and specificity using 7-field ETDRS images (85% [95% CI, 77%–91%] and 48% [95% CI, 41%–56%], respectively) or UWF images (83% [95% CI, 75%–89%] and 54% [95% CI, 46%–61%], respectively) were comparable. For detection of high-risk PDR, sensitivity and specificity were higher when using UWF images (87% [95% CI, 78%–93%] and 49% [95% CI, 42%–56%], respectively, for UWF versus 80% [95% CI, 69–88%] and 40% [95% CI, 34%–47%], respectively, for 7-field ETDRS images). Participants preferred ophthalmologists’ assessments; in their absence, they preferred immediate feedback by graders, maintaining periodic ophthalmologist evaluations. When compared with the current standard of care, the new pathway could save £1390 per 100 DME visits and between £461 and £1189 per 100 PDR visits. Conclusions The new pathway has acceptable sensitivity and would release resources. Users’ suggestions should guide implementation.

Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration accounts for close to one-quarter of cases of legal blindness in the USA and the UK. Despite this notable disease burden, the pathophysiology of GA is complex and not fully understood, and there is currently no approved treatment to prevent or slow its progression. GA is heterogeneous in its appearance and extent, and underlying associated traits such as drusen and complement factor polymorphisms vary between patients and by ethnicity, posing a challenge for treatment development. The root cause of vision loss in GA is photoreceptor death; therefore, protecting photoreceptors from damage and delaying their degeneration are key to successful GA treatment. There are multiple neuroprotective pathways that may contribute to protecting photoreceptors from damage, and compounds that target these pathways include antioxidants, neurotrophic factors, and catalases. However, the efficacy of previously trialled neuroprotective therapies in GA, such as brimonidine, tandospirone, and NT-501, has been inconsistent; this may be due to their target of action, method of delivery, and/or suboptimal duration of action. Neurotrophic factors, or molecules involved in neuroprotective signalling cascades, may be ideal agents for further investigation for the treatment of GA. Future neuroprotective strategies in GA must focus on the development of agents with a long duration of action that can combat the progression of chronic damage in GA to provide clinically meaningful benefits for patients.

Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is a common complication of diabetic retinopathy that can lead to progressive and irreversible visual loss. Despite substantial clinical burden, there are no treatments for DMI, no validated clinical trial endpoints, and few clinical trials focusing on DMI. Therefore, generating consensus on validated endpoints that can be used in DMI for the development of effective interventions is vital. In this review, we discuss potential endpoints appropriate for use in clinical trials of DMI, and consider the data required to establish acceptable and meaningful endpoints. A combination of anatomical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures will provide the most complete picture of changes that occur during the progression of DMI. Potential endpoint measures include change in size of the foveal avascular zone measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and change over time in best-corrected visual acuity. However, these endpoints must be supported by further research. We also recommend studies to investigate the natural history and progression of DMI. In addition to improving understanding of how patient demographics and comorbidities such as diabetic macular edema affect clinical trial endpoints, these studies would help to build the consensus definition of DMI that is currently missing from clinical practice and research.

OBJECTIVE To compare four screening strategies for diabetic macular edema (DME). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients attending diabetic retinopathy screening were recruited and received macular optical coherence tomography (OCT), in addition to visual acuity (VA) and fundus photography (FP) assessments, as part of the standard protocol. Two retina specialists provided the reference grading by independently assessing each subject’s screened data for DME. The current standard protocol (strategy A) was compared for sensitivity, specificity, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with three alternative candidate protocols using a simulation model with the same subjects. In strategy B, macular hemorrhage or microaneurysm on FP were removed as surrogate markers for possible DME. Strategy C used best-corrected instead of habitual/pinhole VA and added central subfield thickness (CST) >290 μm on OCT in suspected cases as a confirmation marker for possible DME. Strategy D used CST >290 μm OCT in all subjects as a surrogate marker for suspected DME. RESULTS We recruited 2,277 subjects (mean age 62.80 ± 11.75 years, 43.7% male). The sensitivities and specificities were 40.95% and 86.60%, 22.86% and 95.63%, 32.38% and 100%, and 74.47% and 98.34% for strategies A, B, C, and D, respectively. The costs (in U.S. dollars) of each QALY gained for strategies A, B, C, and D were $7,447.50, $8,428.70, $5,992.30, and $4,113.50, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The high false-positive rate of the current protocol generates unnecessary referrals, which are inconvenient for patients and costly for society. Incorporating universal OCT for screening DME can reduce false-positive results by eightfold, while improving sensitivity and long-term cost-effectiveness.

Purpose Approximately 50% of patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy show significant improvement in diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS), in particular at DRSS level 47 to 53 (moderately severe to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy). Level 47 to 53 consists of 3 main features: deep hemorrhages (DH), venous beading (VB), and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs). It is unclear whether these features respond to anti-VEGF therapies differently. Design Post hoc analysis of Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Panretinal Photocoagulation in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (CLARITY) study. Participants Treatment-naive participants randomized to intravitreal aflibercept. Methods We reanalyzed the fundus images at baseline, week 12, and week 52 to assess the changes of the 3 main features in DRSS level 47 to 53 in those patients who were treatment naive and had received aflibercept. Main Outcome Measures Changes in DH, VB, and IRMA after aflibercept therapy at weeks 12 and 52. Results Fifty-five treatment-naive eyes at baseline that received aflibercept were included in the study. Severe DH and severe IRMA improved in approximately 75% of eyes at week 12 and mostly remained improved at week 52; VB remained unchanged in all eyes at week 12. From 12 weeks, 32 eyes that had received injections showed improved or stable DH compared with 7 eyes that did not receive injections, and DH deteriorated in 6 eyes with no further injections compared with 4 eyes that had received more injections (P = 0.0072). Similarly, 15 eyes that continued to receive injections from week 12 showed improved or stable IRMA compared with 4 who did not receive injections (P = 0.006). Worsening of IRMA was seen in 5 eyes with no further injections compared with 4 eyes that continued to receive injections. The improvements in DH and IRMA are more likely to be maintained if less than 16 weeks have elapsed since the last anti-VEGF injection. Conclusions Aflibercept seems to improve DH and IRMA after just 3 injections. As soon as the frequency of injections were reduced, DH and IRMA can deteriorate again. It is unclear whether these results can be translated to patients without PDR.

The age spectrum of human populations is shifting toward the older with larger proportions suffering physical decline. Mitochondria influence the pace of aging as the energy they provide for cellular function in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) declines with age. Mitochondrial density is greatest in photoreceptors, particularly cones that have high energy demands and mediate color vision. Hence, the retina ages faster than other organs, with a 70% ATP reduction over life and a significant decline in photoreceptor function. Mitochondria have specific light absorbance characteristics influencing their performance. Longer wavelengths spanning 650–>1,000 nm improve mitochondrial complex activity, membrane potential, and ATP production. Here, we use 670-nm light to improve photoreceptor performance and measure this psychophysically in those aged 28–72 years. Rod and cone performance declined significantly after approximately 40 years of age. 670-nm light had no impact in younger individuals, but in those around 40 years and older, significant improvements were obtained in color contrast sensitivity for the blue visual axis (tritan) known to display mitochondrial vulnerability. The red visual axis (protan) improved but not significantly. Rod thresholds also improved significantly in those >40 years. Using specific wavelengths to enhance mitochondrial performance will be significant in moderating the aging process in this metabolically demanding tissue.

Purpose To describe the defining features of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA), a consensus term referring to the OCT-based anatomic changes often identified before the development of complete RPE and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We provide descriptive OCT and histologic examples of disease progression. Design Consensus meeting. Participants Panel of retina specialists, including retinal imaging experts, reading center leaders, and retinal histologists. Methods As part of the Classification of Atrophy Meeting (CAM) program, an international group of experts analyzed and discussed longitudinal multimodal imaging of eyes with AMD. Consensus was reached on a classification system for OCT-based structural alterations that occurred before the development of atrophy secondary to AMD. New terms of iRORA and cRORA were defined. This report describes in detail the CAM consensus on iRORA. Main Outcome Measures Defining the term iRORA through OCT imaging and longitudinal cases showing progression of atrophy, with histologic correlates. Results OCT was used in cases of early and intermediate AMD as the base imaging method to identify cases of iRORA. In the context of drusen, iRORA is defined on OCT as (1) a region of signal hypertransmission into the choroid, (2) a corresponding zone of attenuation or disruption of the RPE, and (3) evidence of overlying photoreceptor degeneration. The term iRORA should not be used when there is an RPE tear. Longitudinal studies confirmed the concept of progression from iRORA to cRORA. Conclusions An international consensus classification for OCT-defined anatomic features of iRORA are described and examples of longitudinal progression to cRORA are provided. The ability to identify these OCT changes reproducibly is essential to understand better the natural history of the disease, to identify high-risk signs of progression, and to study early interventions. Longitudinal data are required to quantify the implied risk of vision loss associated with these terms. The CAM classification provides initial definitions to enable these future endeavors, acknowledging that the classification will be refined as new data are generated.

Determine clinical-effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML), compared with standard laser (SL), for diabetic macular edema (DME) with central retinal thickness (CRT)400μ.Pragmatic, multicenter, allocation-concealed, double-masked, randomized, non-inferiority trial.Adults with400μ center-involved DME and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in one/both eyes.Randomisation 1:1 to 577nm SML or SL; retreatments were allowed. Rescue with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies or steroids was permitted if10 ETDRS-letter-loss and/or CRT increased400μ.Primary: Mean change in BCVA in the study eye at 24 months (non-inferiority margin 5 ETDRS-letters). Secondary: mean change from baseline to month-24 in binocular BCVA; CRT and mean deviation (MD) of Humphrey 10-2 visual field in the study eye; percentage meeting driving standards; EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L), National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25), and Vision and Quality of Life Index (VisQoL) scores; cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; adverse effects; number of laser and rescue treatments.DIAMONDS recruited fully (n=266); 87% SML and 86% SL had primary outcome data. Mean BCVA change from baseline to month-24 was -2.43 (Standard Deviation [SD] 8.20) and -0.45 (SD 6.72) in SML and SL, respectively. SML was deemed not only non-inferior but also equivalent to SL as the 95% confidence interval (CI) (-3.9 to -0.04) lay wholly within both upper and lower margins of the permitted maximum difference (5 ETDRS-letters). There was no statistically significant difference in binocular BCVA (0.32 ETDRS letters; 95% CI -0.99, 1.64; p = 0.63), CRT (-0.64 microns; 95% CI -14.25, 12.98; p = 0.93), MD (0.39 dB; 95% CI -0.23, 1.02; p = 0.21), meeting driving standards (% point difference 1.6, 95% CI -25.3, 28.5; p=0.91), adverse effects (Risk Ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.06, 1.34; p=0.11), rescue treatments (% point difference -2.8, 95% CI -13.1, 7.5; p=0.59) or EQ-5D/VFQ-25/VisQoL scores. Number of laser treatments was higher in SML (0.48; 95% CI 0.18, 0.79; p = 0.002). Base-case analysis indicated no differences in costs or QALYs.SML was equivalent to SL, requiring slightly higher laser treatments.

Purpose\ud To estimate prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a UK region by severity between 2012 and 2016 and risk factors for progression to proliferative DR (PDR).\ud \ud Methods\ud Electronic medical records from people with diabetes (PWD) ≥18 years seen at the Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (GDESP) and the hospital eye clinic were analysed (HEC). Prevalence and incidence of DR per 100 PWD (%) by calendar year, grade and diabetes type were estimated using log-linear regression. Progression to PDR and associated risk factors were estimated using parametric survival analyses.\ud \ud Results\ud Across the study period, 35 873 PWD had at least one DR assessment. They were aged 66 (56–75) years (median (interquartile range)), 57% male, 5 (1–10) years since diabetes diagnosis, 93% Type 2 diabetes. Prevalence of DR decreased from 38.9% (95% CI: 38.1%, 39.8%) in 2012 to 36.6% (95% CI: 35.9%, 37.3%) in 2016 (p < 0.001). Incidence of any DR decreased from 10.9% (95% CI: 10.4%, 11.5%) in 2013 to 8.5% (95% CI: 8.1%, 9.0%) in 2016 (p < 0.001). Prevalence of PDR decreased from 3.5% (95% CI: 3.3%, 3.8%) in 2012 to 3.1% (95% CI 2.9%, 3.3%) in 2016 (p = 0.008). Incidence of PDR did not change over time. HbA1c and bilateral moderate–severe NPDR were statistically significant risk factors associated with progression to PDR.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Incidence and prevalence of DR decreased between 2012 and 2016 in this well-characterized population of the UK.

Background Diabetic macular ischaemia (DMI) is a complication of diabetic retinopathy that leads to irreversible vision loss. DMI is characterised by reduced retinal vessel density and enlargement of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Despite its clinical burden, there is no formal consensus on the definition of DMI, and no approved treatment. Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) is an axonal guidance molecule that blocks revascularisation of the ischaemic retina. Sema3A modulation is therefore a promising mechanism of action for the treatment of ischaemic eye diseases. BI 764524 is an intravitreal anti-Sema3A ischaemia modulator agent. Methods HORNBILL (NCT04424290) is a phase I/IIa trial comprising a non-randomised, open-label, single rising dose (SRD) part and a randomised, masked, sham-controlled multiple dose (MD) part to investigate the safety, tolerability and early biological response of ischaemia modulator BI 764524 in adults (≥18 years) with DMI. DMI will be defined using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) as either any degree of disruption in the retinal vascularity (SRD) or a FAZ of ≥0.5 mm2 (MD). Subjects in the SRD part will receive 0.5, 1.0 or 2.5 mg of BI 764524; the maximum tolerated dose will then be used in the MD part. A minimum of 12 subjects will be enrolled into the SRD part; planned enrollment is 30 for the MD part. The primary endpoint of the SRD part is the number of subjects with dose-limiting adverse events (AEs) until day 8. The primary endpoint of the MD part is the number of subjects with drug-related AEs from baseline to end of study, and secondary endpoints include change from baseline in the size of the FAZ, best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Discussion DMI is a poorly defined condition with no treatment options. HORNBILL is the first clinical trial to assess a treatment for DMI and to use OCTA as a means to define and examine DMI. The OCTA data generated in this trial could form the basis of formal diagnostic criteria for DMI. Furthermore, the novel mechanism of action (Sema3A modulation) explored in this trial has the potential to revolutionise the treatment landscape for patients with DMI. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04424290; EudraCT 2019-004432-28. Registered on 9 June 2020

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness. Late AMD can be classified into exudative (commonly known as wet AMD [wAMD]) or dry AMD, both of which may progress to macular atrophy (MA). MA causes irreversible vision loss and currently has no approved pharmacological treatment. The standard of care for wAMD is treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs). However, recent evidence suggests that anti-VEGF treatment may play a role in the development of MA. Therefore, it is important to identify risk factors for the development of MA in patients with wAMD. For example, excessive blockade of VEGF through intense use of anti-VEGF agents may accelerate the development of MA. Patients with type III macular neovascularization (retinal angiomatous proliferation) have a particularly high risk of MA. These patients are characterized as having a pre-existing thin choroid (age-related choroidopathy), suggesting that the choroidal circulation is unable to respond to increased VEGF expression. Evidence suggests that subretinal fluid (possibly indicative of residual VEGF activity) may play a protective role. Patients receiving anti-VEGF agents must be assessed for overall risk of MA, and there is an unmet medical need to prevent the development of MA without undertreating wAMD.

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) with threshold conventional laser (TCL) in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).MethodsProspective, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority, 12-week clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to SML group or TCL group. Patients in the SML group were treated with 577 nm micropulse laser. The spot size was 160 µm, the duty cycle was 5% and exposure time was 0.2 s. The power was 50% threshold tested. Patients in the TCL group were treated with 577 nm continuous laser. The power was 100% threshold tested. The primary outcome was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 12, with a non-inferiority limit of five letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity charts.ResultsEighty-eight patients were enroled. Seventy-seven patients were male. Forty-four patients were in SML group and 44 in TCL group. At week 12, SML was equivalent to TCL with a gain of 6.23 ± 8.59 and 6.61 ± 6.35 letters, respectively, (SML–TCL difference: −0.38 letters; 95% confidence interval (CI):−3.58–2.81;Pnon-inferiority = 0.0026). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.240,P = 0.811). At week 12, the proportion of patients whose SRF had been totally absorbed was 63.63 and 81.82% respectively for SML and TCL groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 3.67,P = 0.056).ConclusionsBoth SML and TCL can improve visual acuity in CSC. SML was non-inferior to TCL in the improvement of BCVA.

Background: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is effectively treated with ranibizumab but multiple injections are required. Where there is also peripheral ischaemia, it has been promoted that targeted panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) may reduce the number of injections. Method: Patients with optical coherence tomography confirmed DMO and Ultra-widefield Fundus Fluorescein Angiography confirmed peripheral retinal ischaemia were randomised to PRP plus ranibizumab or ranibizumab monotherapy. After three injections, repeat injections were given until the visual acuity was stable and the macula was dry. Re-treatment was given if there was a drop of visual acuity and/or a recurrence of intra-retinal fluid. The primary outcome was the number of repeat injections required after the first 6 months up until 1 year. Results: There were 49 patients, 25 in the ranibizumab only group and 24 in the ranibizumab + PRP group recruited at seven UK sites. The average number of injections in the ranibizumab-only arm was 6.84 over 1 year and 2.52 between months 6 and 12. The average number of injections in the combined arm was 6.67, with the number of injections in the second 6 months 1.92. For the primary outcome, comparing the number of 6- to 12-month injections, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.33). Conclusion: The addition of targeted PRP to areas of non-perfusion in a patient with DMO does not reduce the number of injections required in the first year. It seems most likely that local VEGF at the macula is the main cause of DMO.

Background/aimsSurveillance of people with previously successfully treated diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) adds pressure on ophthalmology services. This study evaluated a new surveillance pathway entailing multimodal imaging reviewed by trained ophthalmic graders and compared it with the current standard care (face-to-face evaluation by an ophthalmologist).MethodsCost analysis of the new ophthalmic grader pathway, compared with the standard of care, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service, based on evidence from the Effectiveness of Multimodal imaging for the Evaluation of Retinal oedema And new vesseLs in Diabetic retinopathy study. Resource use data were prospectively obtained including times to undertake each procedure. Effectiveness was assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity of referral decisions in the grader pathway. Costs (SDs) were analysed per 100 patients separately for DMO and PDR at 2018/2019 costs.ResultsFor DMO, where sensitivity was very high (97%), the cost difference (savings) for the grader’s pathway would be £1390 per 100 patients. For PDR, the cost would be reduced by £461 for seven-field Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) images and by £1889 for ultrawide field images, per 100 patients. Ultrawide images required less time to be obtained and read than seven-field ETDRS. The real savings would be in ophthalmologist time, which could be then redirected to the evaluation of people at high risk of visual loss.ConclusionsSurveillance of people with previously successfully treated DMO and PDR by trained ophthalmic graders can achieve satisfactory results and release ophthalmologist time.Trial registration numbersNCT03490318,ISRCTN10856638.

Owing to the increasing prevalence of diabetes, the workload related to diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy is rising, making it difficult for hospital eye services to meet demands.The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of a new pathway using multimodal imaging interpreted by ophthalmic graders to detect reactivation of diabetic macular oedema/proliferative diabetic retinopathy in previously treated patients.This was a prospective, case-referent, cross-sectional diagnostic study.The setting was ophthalmic clinics in 13 NHS hospitals.Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with previously successfully treated diabetic macular oedema/proliferative diabetic retinopathy in one/both eyes in whom, at the time of enrolment, diabetic macular oedema/proliferative diabetic retinopathy could be active or inactive.For the ophthalmic grader pathway, review of the spectral domain optical coherence tomography scans to detect diabetic macular oedema, and seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study/ultra-wide field fundus images to detect proliferative diabetic retinopathy, by trained ophthalmic graders. For the current standard care pathway (reference standard), ophthalmologists examined patients face to face by slit-lamp biomicroscopy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and, in addition, spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging for diabetic macular oedema.The primary outcome measure was sensitivity of the ophthalmic grader pathway to detect active diabetic macular oedema/proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The secondary outcomes were specificity, agreement between pathways, cost-consequences, acceptability and the proportion of patients requiring subsequent ophthalmologist assessment, unable to undergo imaging and with inadequate quality images/indeterminate findings. It was assumed for the main analysis that all patients in whom graders diagnosed active disease or were 'unsure' or images were 'ungradable' required examination by an ophthalmologist.Eligible participants with active and inactive diabetic macular oedema (152 and 120 participants, respectively) and active and inactive proliferative diabetic retinopathy (111 and 170 participants, respectively) were recruited. Under the main analysis, graders had a sensitivity of 97% (142/147) (95% confidence interval 92% to 99%) and specificity of 31% (35/113) (95% confidence interval 23% to 40%) to detect diabetic macular oedema. For proliferative diabetic retinopathy, graders had a similar sensitivity and specificity using seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [sensitivity 85% (87/102), 95% confidence interval 77% to 91%; specificity 48% (77/160), 95% confidence interval 41% to 56%] or ultra-wide field imaging [sensitivity 83% (87/105), 95% confidence interval 75% to 89%; specificity 54% (86/160), 95% confidence interval 46% to 61%]. Participants attending focus groups expressed preference for face-to-face evaluations by ophthalmologists. In the ophthalmologists' absence, patients voiced the need for immediate feedback following grader's assessments, maintaining periodic evaluations by ophthalmologists. Graders and ophthalmologists were supportive of the new pathway. When compared with the reference standard (current standard pathway), the new grader pathway could save £1390 per 100 patients in the review of people with diabetic macular oedema and, depending on the imaging modality used, between £461 and £1189 per 100 patients in the review of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.For people with diabetic macular oedema, the ophthalmic grader pathway appears safe and cost saving. The sensitivity of the new pathway to detect active proliferative diabetic retinopathy was lower, but may still be considered acceptable for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy previously treated with laser. Suggestions from focus group discussions should be taken into consideration if the new pathway is introduced to ensure its acceptability to users.Lack of fundus fluorescein angiography to confirm diagnosis of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Could refinement of the new pathway increase its sensitivity to detect proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Could artificial intelligence be used for automated reading of images in this previously treated population?Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10856638 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03490318.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inMore and more people are developing diabetes. Diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy are complications of diabetes, which could cause blindness. Thus, people with diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy need to be treated in a timely manner and reviewed in clinic for life. The population in the world is ageing. As a result, there are more people with eye diseases. There are also more treatments now for people with eye diseases. The workload in hospitals is increasing, making it difficult for the NHS to cope with the demand. There are not enough ophthalmologists (eye doctors) to look after patients. Delayed appointments and treatment mean that patients may lose sight. The goal of EMERALD (Effectiveness of Multimodal imaging for the Evaluation of Retinal oedema And new vesseLs in Diabetic retinopathy) was to see if patients with treated and stable diabetic macular oedema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy could be followed by ‘ophthalmic graders’, who are not doctors but are trained to diagnose diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. In EMERALD, trained ophthalmic graders examined photographs of the back of the eye of people with diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. They checked if diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy remain inactive. If so, patients could continue follow-up with the ophthalmic graders. If diabetic macular oedema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy were active, graders would immediately refer patients to ophthalmologists. EMERALD found that graders were excellent at detecting diabetic macular oedema, and this could give ophthalmologists time to see other patients. Graders were not quite as good at detecting active proliferative diabetic retinopathy. However, considering that patients had already had treatment, this may still be safe. Patients participating in focus group discussions mentioned that they would prefer to see ophthalmologists, so they could ask questions about their eye condition. If this was not possible, they would like to have immediate results from graders and still see the ophthalmologist from time to time.

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their effects on cardiac structure and function in HFrEF are uncertain. Methods: We designed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the SUGAR-DM-HF trial [Studies of Empagliflozin and Its Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Effects in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus, or Prediabetes, and Heart Failure]) to investigate the cardiac effects of empagliflozin in patients in New York Heart Association functional class II to IV with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40% and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo, stratified by age ( Results: From April 2018 to August 2019, 105 patients were randomly assigned: mean age 68.7 (SD, 11.1) years, 77 (73.3%) male, 82 (78.1%) diabetes and 23 (21.9%) prediabetes, mean LV ejection fraction 32.5% (9.8%), and 81 (77.1%) New York Heart Association II and 24 (22.9%) New York Heart Association III. Patients received standard treatment for HFrEF. In comparison with placebo, empagliflozin reduced LV end-systolic volume index by 6.0 (95% CI, –10.8 to –1.2) mL/m 2 ( P =0.015). There was no difference in LV global longitudinal strain. Empagliflozin reduced LV end-diastolic volume index by 8.2 (95% CI, –13.7 to –2.6) mL/m 2 ( P =0.0042) and reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide by 28% (2%–47%), P =0.038. There were no between-group differences in other cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures, diuretic intensification, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score, 6-minute walk distance, or B-lines. Conclusions: The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced LV volumes in patients with HFrEF and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Favorable reverse LV remodeling may be a mechanism by which sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce heart failure hospitalization and mortality in HFrEF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03485092.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment for new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers and checked references of included studies. We last searched the databases on 4 May 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to AMD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard procedures expected by Cochrane. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We considered the following outcomes at 12 months: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (loss of 3 or more lines, change in visual acuity), contrast sensitivity, new vessel growth, quality of life and adverse effects at any time point. MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 studies (n = 2430 people, 2432 eyes) of radiation therapy with dosages ranging from 7.5 to 24 Gy. These studies mainly took place in Europe and North America but two studies were from Japan and one multicentre study included sites in South America. Three of these studies investigated brachytherapy (plaque and epimacular), the rest were studies of external beam radiotherapy (EBM) including one trial of stereotactic radiotherapy. Four studies compared radiotherapy combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) with anti-VEGF alone. Eleven studies gave no radiotherapy treatment to the control group; five studies used sham irradiation; and one study used very low-dose irradiation (1 Gy). One study used a mixture of sham irradiation and no treatment. Fifteen studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy There may be little or no difference in loss of 3 lines of vision at 12 months in eyes treated with radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.04, 811 eyes, 8 studies, I2 = 66%, low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests a small benefit in change in visual acuity (mean difference (MD) -0.10 logMAR, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.03; eyes = 883; studies = 10) and average contrast sensitivity at 12 months (MD 0.15 log units, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.25; eyes = 267; studies = 2). Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported and It was not possible to produce a summary estimate of this outcome. The studies were small with imprecise estimates and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life was only reported in one study of 199 people; there was no clear difference between treatment and control groups (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence was available on adverse effects from eight of 14 studies. Seven studies reported on radiation retinopathy and/or neuropathy. Five of these studies reported no radiation-associated adverse effects. One study of 88 eyes reported one case of possible radiation retinopathy. One study of 74 eyes graded retinal abnormalities in some detail and found that 72% of participants who had radiation compared with 71% of participants in the control group had retinal abnormalities resembling radiation retinopathy or choroidopathy. Four studies reported cataract surgery or progression: events were generally few with no consistent evidence of any increased occurrence in the radiation group. One study noted transient disturbance of the precorneal tear film but there was no evidence from the other two studies that reported dry eye of any increased risk with radiation therapy. None of the participants received anti-VEGF injections. Radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone People receiving radiotherapy/anti-VEGF were probably more likely to lose 3 or more lines of BCVA at 12 months compared with anti-VEGF alone (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.17, 1050 eyes, 3 studies, moderate-certainty). Most of the data for this outcome come from two studies of epimacular brachytherapy (114 events) compared with 20 events from the one trial of EBM. Data on change in BCVA were heterogenous (I2 = 82%). Individual study results ranged from a small difference of -0.03 logMAR in favour of radiotherapy/anti-VEGF to a difference of 0.13 logMAR in favour of anti-VEGF alone (low-certainty evidence). The effect differed depending on how the radiotherapy was delivered (test for interaction P = 0.0007). Epimacular brachytherapy was associated with worse visual outcomes (MD 0.10 logMAR, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15, 820 eyes, 2 studies) compared with EBM (MD -0.03 logMAR, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03, 252 eyes, 2 studies). None of the included studies reported contrast sensitivity or quality of life. Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported in three studies (803 eyes). It was not possible to produce a summary estimate and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). For adverse outcomes, variable results were reported in the four studies. In three studies reports of adverse events were low and no radiation-associated adverse events were reported. In one study of epimacular brachytherapy there was a higher proportion of ocular adverse events (54%) compared to the anti-VEGF alone (18%). The majority of these adverse events were cataract. Overall 5% of the treatment group had radiation device-related adverse events (17 cases); 10 of these cases were radiation retinopathy. There were differences in average number of injections given between the four studies (1072 eyes). In three of the four studies, the anti-VEGF alone group on average received more injections (moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is uncertain regarding the use of radiotherapy for neovascular AMD. Most studies took place before the routine use of anti-VEGF, and before the development of modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Visual outcomes with epimacular brachytherapy are likely to be worse, with an increased risk of adverse events, probably related to vitrectomy. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF is currently uncertain. Further research on radiotherapy for neovascular AMD may not be justified until current ongoing studies have reported their results.

Purpose Patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with good visual acuity (VA) represent a controversial clinical scenario in which a subthreshold laser might be a reasonable approach. We report a case series of patients with CI-DME with VA better than 20/32 who were treated with a subthreshold 577 nm (yellow) laser. Methods The area of retinal thickening on OCT was treated with confluent laser spots at individually titrated power. The fovea was spared from treatment. Effectiveness and safety were evaluated through OCT and autofluorescence (AF) as well as BCVA. Results A total of 23 eyes from 19 patients were treated. VA ranged from 20/20 to 20/30. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. Edema in OCT resolved completely at the end of follow-up in 56.5% (13/23) of the cases. Central retinal thickness was reduced at 12 weeks and at the end of follow-up, with a mean reduction of 16.9 μm and 22 μm, respectively (paired t-test p = 0.001 and 0.0003). VA remained stable. The laser was invisible (OCT, AF, Fundoscopy) in 91,3% (21/23) of eyes. Conclusions A fovea-sparing yellow subthreshold laser was safe and effective for treating CI-DME patients with good VA in this case series. This technique is of interest to prevent the progression of mild edema and might avoid or reduce the use of more invasive and expensive therapies. Excluding the fovea from the treated area does not seem to affect the results, which is of interest to novel laser practitioners.

Limited evidence suggests that the application of 670 nm of red light alters the course of aged decline. A previous report on 18 patients showed regression of drusen and improvement in visual functions in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by 12 months. We evaluated the functional and structural effects of applying 670 nm light to 31 patients with intermediate AMD and 11 people aged 55 years or above with normal retina. The study eyes were treated daily in the morning with a 670 nm hand-held light source housed in a torch-like tube that emitted energy equivalent to 40 mW/cm2 or 4.8J/ cm2 for 2 min at the viewing aperture. Visual function in terms of best-corrected visual acuity, low luminance visual acuity, scotopic thresholds and rod-intercept time were compared between baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Structural changes on optical coherence tomography OCT and colour photographs were also assessed. Five withdrew consent voluntarily due to the intensity of the study visit assessments and two developed neovascular AMD and were excluded from further treatment and the analysis. In normal ageing, there was an improvement in scotopic thresholds in the group with no AMD by 1.77dB (p = 0.03) and no other parameters showed any clinically significant change. In eyes with intermediate AMD, there was no significant improvement in any functional or structural changes at any time point up to 12 months although the compliance was good. This pilot study shows that photobiomodulation with 670 nm has no effect in patients who have already progressed to intermediate AMD.

Approximately 50% of patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy show significant improvement in diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS), in particular at DRSS level 47 to 53 (moderately severe to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy). Level 47 to 53 consists of 3 main features: deep hemorrhages (DH), venous beading (VB), and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs). It is unclear whether these features respond to anti-VEGF therapies differently.Post hoc analysis of Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Panretinal Photocoagulation in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (CLARITY) study.Treatment-naïve participants randomized to intravitreal aflibercept.We reanalyzed the fundus images at baseline, week 12, and week 52 to assess the changes of the 3 main features in DRSS level 47 to 53 in those patients who were treatment naïve and had received aflibercept.Changes in DH, VB, and IRMA after aflibercept therapy at weeks 12 and 52.Fifty-five treatment-naïve eyes at baseline that received aflibercept were included in the study. Severe DH and severe IRMA improved in approximately 75% of eyes at week 12 and mostly remained improved at week 52; VB remained unchanged in all eyes at week 12. From 12 weeks, 32 eyes that had received injections showed improved or stable DH compared with 7 eyes that did not receive injections, and DH deteriorated in 6 eyes with no further injections compared with 4 eyes that had received more injections (P = 0.0072). Similarly, 15 eyes that continued to receive injections from week 12 showed improved or stable IRMA compared with 4 who did not receive injections (P = 0.006). Worsening of IRMA was seen in 5 eyes with no further injections compared with 4 eyes that continued to receive injections. The improvements in DH and IRMA are more likely to be maintained if less than 16 weeks have elapsed since the last anti-VEGF injection.Aflibercept seems to improve DH and IRMA after just 3 injections. As soon as the frequency of injections were reduced, DH and IRMA can deteriorate again. It is unclear whether these results can be translated to patients without PDR.