Search

Background: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model.Methods: We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6-12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies.Results: Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens.Conclusions: Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pathological evaluations give the best prognostic markers for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy, but the observer variance is substantial. These risk assessments should be supported and supplemented by objective methods for identifying patients at increased risk of recurrence. Markers of epigenetic aberrations have shown promising results in several cancer types and can be assessed by automatic analysis of chromatin organisation in tumour cell nuclei.Methods: A consecutive series of 317 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a national hospital between 1987 and 2005 were followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range, 7-14). On average three tumour block samples from each patient were included to account for tumour heterogeneity. We developed a novel marker, termed Nucleotyping, based on automatic assessment of disordered chromatin organisation, and validated its ability to predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Results: Nucleotyping predicted recurrence with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-5.1). With adjustment for clinical and pathological characteristics, the HR was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5-4.1). An updated stratification into three risk groups significantly improved the concordance with patient outcome compared with a state-of-the-art risk-stratification tool (P<0.001). The prognostic impact was most evident for the patients who were high-risk by clinical and pathological characteristics and for patients with Gleason score 7.Conclusion: A novel assessment of epigenetic aberrations was capable of improving risk stratification after radical prostatectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. The aims of this study were to establish 15-year postprostatectomy prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), explore the time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse and identify clinically available prognostic factors. Material and methods. From 1987 to 2004, 309 men (median age 62 years, range 40-74 years) were prostatectomized for localized prostate cancer at a tertiary referral cancer centre. Slightly modified D'Amico risk groups were identified. PSA relapse was defined as PSA ≥ 4 μg/l before 2000, and thereafter as PSA > 0.2 μg/l. Radical prostatectomy (RP) 3-12 months after diagnosis represented 'deferred' RP. PCSM was assessed with competing risk modelling. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. After a median of 12 years, 41 men were dead from prostate cancer and 68 due to other causes [15-year PCSM 15%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10-19%], with no significant difference in PCSM between the low- and intermediate-risk groups, and the 'conventional' high-risk group having 24% PCSM (95% CI 16-32%). PCSM was 33% (95% CI 20-46%) for men with two high-risk factors. The median time to PSA relapse ( n = 152) was 5 (range 0-17) years, with a median of 7 (range 0-17) years' survival thereafter. Deferral of RP for up to 1 year had no impact on PCSM for all patients combined. Conclusions. Approximately one in seven men with localized prostate cancer, prostatectomized before the PSA era, will die from the disease within the 15 years post-RP. Men with two high-risk criteria have a particularly poor prognosis. After PSA relapse the median survival is 7 years. The data on deferral of RP need confirmation, taking into account risk group allocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical outcome for the individual prostate cancer patient is often difficult to predict, due to lack of reliable independent prognostic biomarkers. We tested DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor for clinical outcome in 186 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods: DNA ploidy was measured using an automatic image cytometry system and correlated with preoperative PSA, age at surgery, Mostofi grade, surgical margins and Gleason score. Results: The mean follow up time after operation was 73.3 months (range 2–176 months). Of the 186 prostatectomies, 96 were identified as diploid, 61 as tetraploid and 29 as aneuploid. Twenty-three per cent, 36% and 62% of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid cases respectively, suffered from relapse during the observation time. DNA ploidy, Gleason score, Mostofi grading, surgical margins and preoperative PSA were all significant predictors of relapse in a univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only Gleason score and DNA ploidy proved to be independently predictors of disease recurrence. Furthermore, among the 68 cases identified with Gleason score 7, DNA ploidy was the only significant predictor of disease recurrence. Conclusions: Our data suggest that DNA ploidy should be included as an important additive prognostic factor for prostate cancer, especially for patients identified with Gleason score 7 tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination of DNA ploidy and automatically estimated stroma fraction has been shown to correlate with recurrence and cancer death in colorectal cancer. We aimed to extend this observation and evaluate the prognostic importance of this combined marker in prostate cancer. DNA ploidy status was determined by image cytometry and the stroma fraction was estimated automatically on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections in three tumor samples from each patient to account for tumor heterogeneity. The optimal threshold for low (≤56%) and high (>56%) stroma fraction was identified in a discovery cohort (n = 253). The combined marker was validated in an independent patient cohort (n = 259) with biochemical recurrence as endpoint. The combined marker predicted biochemical recurrence independently in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis showed that the highest risk of recurrence was observed for patients with samples that had both non-diploid ploidy status and a high stroma fraction (hazard ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-5.34). In conclusion, we suggest the combination of DNA ploidy and automatically estimated stroma fraction as a prognostic marker for the risk stratification of prostate cancer patients. It may also be a potential generic marker as concurrent results have been described in colorectal cancer., (© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Hormone-resistant prostate cancer is defined by disease progression despite of castration levels of serum testosterone. Due to a good palliative effect and low toxicity, radiotherapy is the cornerstone in treatment of painful bone metastases, the most frequent symptom of advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Patients presenting with spinal cord compression should be assessed for decompressive surgery before radiotherapy. With local growth of prostate cancer and problems with urination, a transurethral resection may palliate symptoms. Postoperative radiotherapy should however be considered for these patients, so local regrowth of the tumour can be prevented. Taxan-based chemotherapy (docetaxel) is the first treatment shown to increase overall survival in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer, and is today's standard treatment of Norwegian patients (guidelines from the Norwegian Urological Cancer Group). Secondary hormone treatment and administration of bisphosphonates are other established alternatives for palliation of symptoms in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer. The survival of future patients with such cancer is expected to improve if multidisciplinary health care teams with knowledge of prostate cancer tumour biology administer new treatments.

Background: Brachytherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of early prostate cancer, but has not been implemented as a treatment option in Norway. Recent advances in imaging techniques and the radiation technology itself has facilitated improvements in and better standardisation of brachytherapy., Material and Methods: An group of expert assisted the Norwegian Centre for Health Technology Assessment (SMM) in a systematic review of the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of prostate brachytherapy. The literature was identified by a defined search strategy, and assessed for relevance and validity. Only controlled or comparative studies were included in the review., Results: There were no randomized controlled trials or large prospective studies. Many of the relevant studies were of poor validity. None of the included studies had sufficient follow-up for overall or disease free survival. There were no differences between brachytherapy, external beam therapy or radical prostatectomy in disease free survival (PSA measures) or in rates of complications., Interpretation: There is a lack of valid data from large prospective studies on the clinical effectiveness of brachytherapy. On the other hand, the clinical effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy is also poorly documented. Results from one large randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with brachytherapy in the USA will not be available within the next ten years.