1. Why we should not (always) assume data generating distributions in Machine Learning
- Author
-
Höltgen, Benedikt and Williamson, Robert C.
- Subjects
Computer Science - Machine Learning - Abstract
Machine Learning research, as most of Statistics, heavily relies on the concept of a data-generating probability distribution. As data points are thought to be sampled from such a distribution, we can learn from observed data about this distribution and, thus, predict future data points drawn from it (with some probability of success). Drawing on scholarship across disciplines, we here argue that this framework is not always a good model. Not only do such true probability distributions not exist; the framework can also be misleading and obscure both the choices made and the goals pursued in machine learning practice. We suggest an alternative framework that focuses on finite populations rather than abstract distributions; while classical learning theory can be left almost unchanged, it opens new opportunities, especially to model sampling. We compile these considerations into five reasons for modelling machine learning -- in some settings -- with finite distributions rather than generative distributions, both to be more faithful to practice and to provide novel theoretical insights., Comment: Presented at the Humans, Algorithmic Decision-Making and Society Workshop at ICML 2024
- Published
- 2024