Search

Recent research and clinical experience with cochlear implants suggest that subjects' speech recognition with monopolar or broad bipolar stimulation might be equal to or better than that obtained with narrow bipolar stimulation or other spatially restricted electrode configurations. Furthermore, subjects often prefer the monopolar configurations. The mechanisms underlying these effects are not clear. Two hypotheses are (a) that broader configurations excite more neurons resulting in a more detailed and robust neural representation of the signal and (b) that broader configurations achieve a better spatial distribution of the excited neurons. In this study we compared the effects of electrode configuration and the effects of longitudinal placement and spacing of the active electrodes on speech recognition in human subjects. We used experimental processor maps consisting of 11 active electrodes in a 22-electrode scala tympani array. Narrow bipolar (BP), wide bipolar (BP + 6), and monopolar (MP2) configurations were tested with various locations of active electrodes. We tested basal, centered, and apical locations (with adjacent active electrodes) and spatially distributed locations (with every other electrode active) with electrode configuration held constant. Ten postlingually deafened adult human subjects with Nucleus prostheses were tested using the SPEAK processing strategy. The effects of electrode configuration and longitudinal place of stimulation on recognition of CNC phonemes and words in quiet and CUNY sentences in noise (+10 dB S/N) were similar. Both independent variables had large effects on speech recognition and there were interactions between these variables. These results suggest that the effects of electrode configuration on speech recognition might be due, in part, to differences among the various configurations in the spatial location of stimulation. Correlations of subjective judgments of sound quality with speech-recognition ability were moderate, suggesting that the mechanisms contributing to subjective quality and speech-recognition ability do not completely overlap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Cochlear implants are a treatment option for individuals with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive little or no benefit from hearing aids; however, cochlear implantation in adults is still not routine., Objective: To develop consensus statements regarding the use of unilateral cochlear implants in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL., Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a modified Delphi consensus process that was informed by a systematic review of the literature and clinical expertise. Searches were conducted in the following databases: (1) MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE, (2) Embase, and (3) the Cochrane Library. Consensus statements on cochlear implantation were developed using the evidence identified. This consensus process was relevant for the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL. The literature searches were conducted on July 18, 2018, and the 3-step Delphi consensus method took place over the subsequent 9-month period up to March 30, 2019., Main Outcomes and Measures: A Delphi consensus panel of 30 international specialists voted on consensus statements about cochlear implantation, informed by an SR of the literature and clinical expertise. This vote resulted in 20 evidence-based consensus statements that are in line with clinical experience. A modified 3-step Delphi consensus method was used to vote on and refine the consensus statements. This method consisted of 2 rounds of email questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting of panel members at the final round. All consensus statements were reviewed, discussed, and finalized at the face-to-face meeting., Results: In total, 6492 articles were identified in the searches of the electronic databases. After removal of duplicate articles, 74 articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were used to create the 20 evidence-based consensus statements. These 20 consensus statements on the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL were relevant to the following 7 key areas of interest: level of awareness of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement); best practice clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery (3 consensus statements); best practice guidelines for surgery (2 consensus statements); clinical effectiveness of cochlear implantation (4 consensus statements); factors associated with postimplantation outcomes (4 consensus statements); association between hearing loss and depression, cognition, and dementia (5 consensus statements); and cost implications of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement)., Conclusions and Relevance: These consensus statements represent the first step toward the development of international guidelines on best practices for cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL. Further research to develop consensus statements for unilateral cochlear implantation in children, bilateral cochlear implantation, combined electric-acoustic stimulation, unilateral cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, and asymmetrical hearing loss in children and adults may be beneficial for optimizing hearing and quality of life for these patients.

Importance: Currently, no clear guidelines exist regarding clinical testing methods for identifying adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates. Indications provided by the US Food and Drug Administration, Medicare, and private insurers are ambiguous concerning test materials and the level and mode of test presentation. This could lead to wide variability in clinical assessment and, potentially, unequal access to CIs for individuals with clinically significant hearing loss., Objective: To examine the preoperative testing methods used by audiologists in evaluating adult CI candidates across the United States., Design, Setting, and Participants: A survey assessing audiology practice patterns was created using a Research Electronic Data Capture system hosted at the University of Miami. A link to a survey (65 questions in multiple-choice or rank-order format was distributed electronically along with a request for completion to members of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance and to the Institute for Cochlear Implant Training forum. Responses were collected from January 17 to June 4, 2018. Participation was limited to audiologists who evaluate adult CI candidates, and respondents who do not provide adult CI care were excluded. Collected demographic information included work setting, years of experience, and highest level of education attained., Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages, medians, and interquartile ranges were from aggregated responses concerning hearing aid verification methods; testing methods, materials, and practices; nonauditory factors that might affect CI candidacy; audiology practice patterns; and expanded indications for CIs., Results: Anonymized surveys were returned by 99 respondents; because surveys were available electronically, the number of audiologists who viewed the survey but did not respond was not available. Seven respondents identified themselves as pediatric specialists and were excluded, resulting in a total of 92 surveys available for analysis (denominators vary because respondents could complete the survey without answering all questions). Seventy percent of respondents (51 of 72) were doctors of audiology, and nearly 50% (33 of 74) were employed at universities and academic centers performing more than 50 CIs per year. When assessing adult candidacy for implant, most respondents reported using test materials from the Minimum Speech Test Battery: 96% (51 of 53), using AzBio sentences in quiet; 89% (47 of 53), AzBio sentences in noise; and 100% (53 of 53), the consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant, monosyllabic words test. However, these tests were applied inconsistently, with 39 of 53 respondents (74%) reporting use of a sound pressure level scale and the other 14 (26%) a hearing level scale at various decibel levels, and with some using a single signal-to-noise ratio and others using multiple ratios for sound-in-noise tests. Respondents' definitions of the best aided listening condition for assessing implant candidates also varied widely. Among the nonauditory factors ranked most important for assessing CI candidacy were patient's level of cognition and expectations of CI; yet, few respondents reported including cognitive or psychological tests in the assessment protocol., Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study reveal considerable variability in preoperative testing methods and practices across health care professionals assessing adult candidates for CI. This lack of standardization in the delivery of care may increase the risk for health care inequities, specifically in access to care for adults with clinically significant hearing loss.

Background: The Nucleus ® 6 sound processor is now compatible with the Nucleus ® 22 (CI22M)-Cochlear's first generation cochlear implant. The Nucleus 6 offers three new signal processing algorithms that purportedly facilitate improved hearing in background noise., Purpose: These studies were designed to evaluate listening performance and user satisfaction with the Nucleus 6 sound processor., Research Design: The research design was a prospective, single-participant, repeated measures design., Study Sample: A group of 80 participants implanted with various Nucleus internal implant devices (CI22M, CI24M, Freedom ® CI24RE, CI422, and CI512) were recruited from a total of six North American sites., Data Collection and Analysis: Participants had their external sound processor upgraded to the Nucleus 6 sound processor. Final speech perception testing in noise and subjective questionnaires were completed after four or 12 weeks of take-home use with the Nucleus 6., Results: Speech perception testing in noise showed significant improvement and participants reported increased satisfaction with the Nucleus 6., Conclusion: These studies demonstrated the benefit of the new algorithms in the Nucleus 6 over previous generations of sound processors., (American Academy of Audiology.)

Objective: To evaluate the use of monosyllabic word recognition versus sentence recognition to determine candidacy and long-term benefit for cochlear implantation., Study Design: Prospective multi-center single-subject design., Methods: A total of 21 adults aged 18 years and older with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss and low monosyllabic word scores received unilateral cochlear implantation. The consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word test was the central measure of pre- and postoperative performance. Additional speech understanding tests included the Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet and AzBio sentences in +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Quality of life (QoL) was measured using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Health Utilities Index., Results: Performance on sentence recognition reached the ceiling of the test after only 3 months of implant use. In contrast, none of the participants in this study reached a score of 80% on CNC word recognition, even at the 12-month postoperative test interval. Measures of QoL related to hearing were also significantly improved following implantation., Conclusion: Results of this study demonstrate that monosyllabic words are appropriate for determining preoperative candidate and measuring long-term postoperative speech recognition performance., Level of Evidence: 2c. Laryngoscope, 127:2368-2374, 2017., (© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: To describe the clinical experience and characterize the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (IEVA) as compared to children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) associated with other bony labyrinth abnormalities., Study Design: Single, tertiary care, institutional retrospective review over 2 decades., Methods: The clinical course and outcomes of 55 children with EVA undergoing CI between 1991 and 2013 were reviewed. Test measures included open and closed set speech perception tests, and various speech and language measures., Results: In 18 children (32.7%), IEVA was the only defect present. In 33 children (60%), EVA occurred concomitantly with incomplete partition type 2 (IP 2) bilaterally, and three children with incomplete partition type 1 bilaterally. Ninety-two percent (51 of 55) occurred bilaterally and had matching bony defects. Mean age of CI was 73.4 months. A statistically significant defect-related and linguistic-status pattern was noted, impacting the timing of implantation: IEVA = 112.8 months, IP 2 = 58.4 months (P < .001), prelingual deafness = 53.8 months, postlingual deafness = 110.8 months (P < .001). Controlling for implant age and hearing loss severity, IEVA children demonstrated superior performance on speech perception tests (8.2 to 20.3 point differences), though statistical significance was inconsistent (P = .01-.40. Performance was also superior in speech and language tests, though statistical significance was never reached (2.9-13.9 point differences; P = .14-.69)., Conclusions: Children with hearing loss secondary to EVA respond meaningfully to cochlear implantation. However, the severity of temporal bone anomalies in these children has clinical relevance., Level of Evidence: 4., (© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to discuss cochlear implantation in the setting of severe cochlear otosclerosis and review programming challenges in a patient whose performance is deteriorating as a result of advancing disease., Study Design: We conducted a case report and literature review., Setting: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS, INTERVENTION, AND RESULTS: A case is presented of a 66-year-old man with otosclerosis who initially had good benefit from a cochlear implant but gradually lost benefit even with reimplantation. Imaging studies demonstrated severely distorted otic capsule anatomy from cochlear otosclerosis., Conclusions: Advancing cochlear otosclerosis can result in a severely thinned and distorted otic capsule. Although cochlear implantation is generally beneficial in cochlear otosclerosis, implantation in certain severe cases may be complicated as a result of difficulties with cerebrospinal fluid leak, programming challenges, and other potential hazards that can occur with a distorted anatomy.

Objective: To evaluate the effects that degree of cochlear ossification has on performance of prelingually deafened children who receive cochlear implants., Study Design: A matched-pairs analysis comparing speech perception results obtained 6 and 24 months after implant by children with ossified and nonossified cochleae. Additionally, long-term performance was evaluated in patients with follow-up periods longer than 24 months. Comparisons were also performed within the ossified cochleae group to determine if degree of cochlear ossification and surgical technique affected outcome with the cochlear implant. SETTING Large cochlear implant program in an academic tertiary care medical center., Patients: Twenty-one pairs of prelingually deaf children with and without cochlear ossification. Meningitis was the etiology of hearing loss in children with ossified cochleae. The control group had nonmeningitic etiology for the hearing loss., Interventions: Multichannel cochlear implantation and routine postoperative auditory rehabilitation and performance evaluation., Main Outcome Measures: Speech perception category ratings based on scores obtained on a battery of closed- and open-set speech recognition tests 6 and 24 months after implant. Longer follow-up period is also reported., Results: As a group, children with cochlear ossification showed significant improvement in their speech perception abilities 6 and 24 months after implant. Children with cochlear ossification performed at a significantly lower speech perception category than a group of matched controls with nonossified cochleae at both the 6- and 24-month postimplant intervals. With longer implant use, open-set speech recognition was possible in some children with ossification. Within-group analysis of the children with ossified cochleae revealed that degree of ossification and surgical procedure used for implantation did not significantly affect outcome., Conclusions: Prelingually deafened children with postmeningitic hearing loss and ossified cochleae receive significant benefit from cochlear implants. Their performance is frequently poorer, however, than children with nonossified cochleae.

Recent research and clinical experience with cochlear implants suggest that subjects' speech recognition with monopolar or broad bipolar stimulation might be equal to or better than that obtained with narrow bipolar stimulation or other spatially restricted electrode configurations. Furthermore, subjects often prefer the monopolar configurations. The mechanisms underlying these effects are not clear. Two hypotheses are (a) that broader configurations excite more neurons resulting in a more detailed and robust neural representation of the signal and (b) that broader configurations achieve a better spatial distribution of the excited neurons. In this study we compared the effects of electrode configuration and the effects of longitudinal placement and spacing of the active electrodes on speech recognition in human subjects. We used experimental processor maps consisting of 11 active electrodes in a 22-electrode scala tympani array. Narrow bipolar (BP), wide bipolar (BP + 6), and monopolar (MP2) configurations were tested with various locations of active electrodes. We tested basal, centered, and apical locations (with adjacent active electrodes) and spatially distributed locations (with every other electrode active) with electrode configuration held constant. Ten postlingually deafened adult human subjects with Nucleus prostheses were tested using the SPEAK processing strategy. The effects of electrode configuration and longitudinal place of stimulation on recognition of CNC phonemes and words in quiet and CUNY sentences in noise (+10 dB S/N) were similar. Both independent variables had large effects on speech recognition and there were interactions between these variables. These results suggest that the effects of electrode configuration on speech recognition might be due, in part, to differences among the various configurations in the spatial location of stimulation. Correlations of subjective judgments of sound quality with speech-recognition ability were moderate, suggesting that the mechanisms contributing to subjective quality and speech-recognition ability do not completely overlap.

This study examines the relationship between the teaching method, oral or total communication, used at children's schools and children's consonant-production accuracy and vocabulary development over time. Children who participated in the study (N = 147) demonstrated profound sensorineural hearing loss and had used cochlear implants for between 6 months and 10 years. Educational programs that used an oral communication (OC) approach focused on the development of spoken language, whereas educational programs that used a total communication (TC) approach focused on the development of language using both signed and spoken language. Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) we compared the consonant-production accuracy, receptive spoken vocabulary, and expressive spoken and/or signed vocabulary skills, over time, of children who were enrolled in schools that used either OC or TC approaches, while controlling for a number of variables. These variables included age at implantation, preoperative aided speech detection thresholds, type of cochlear implant device used, and whether a complete or incomplete active electrode array was implanted. The results of this study indicated that as they used their implants the children demonstrated improved consonant-production accuracy and expressive and receptive vocabulary over time, regardless of whether their school employed a TC or OC teaching method. Furthermore, there appeared to be a complex relationship among children's performance with the cochlear implant, age at implantation, and communication/teaching strategy employed by the school. Controlling for all variables, children in OC programs demonstrated, on average, superior consonant-production accuracy, with significantly greater rates of improvement in consonant-production accuracy scores over time compared to children in TC programs. However, there was no significant difference between OC and TC groups in performance or rate of growth in consonant-production accuracy when children received their implants before the age of 5 years. There was no significant difference between the OC and TC groups in receptive spoken vocabulary scores or in rate of improvement over time. However, children in the TC group achieved significantly higher receptive spoken vocabulary scores than children in the OC group if they received their implant before the age of 5 years. The TC group demonstrated superior scores and rates of growth on the expressive vocabulary measure (spoken and/or signed) when compared to the OC group if they received their implants during their preschool or early elementary school years. There was no significant difference if the children received their implants during middle elementary school. Regardless of whether children were in the OC or TC group, children who received their implants during preschool demonstrated stronger performance, on average, on all measures over time than children who received their implants during their elementary school years. The results of this study suggest that children may benefit from using cochlear implants regardless of the communication strategy/teaching approach employed by their school program and that other considerations, such as the age at which children receive implants, are more important. Implications and future research needs are discussed.

Effects of stimulus level on discrimination of one stimulation site from another were examined in 15 human subjects with Nucleus-22 cochlear implant systems. Bipolar stimulation was used in all cases with electrodes in the bipolar pair separated by 1.5 mm (center to center). Subjects were first tested at a medium loudness level, using an adaptive tracking procedure, to determine the regions of the electrode array where electrode-place discrimination was best and the regions where it was poorest. Electrode-place discrimination was then tested at three regions distributed throughout the array, which included the regions of best and poorest discrimination. At each region, electrode-place discrimination was tested at three levels: 25%, 50%, and 75% of the dynamic range. For each of these nine conditions (3 sites x 3 levels), the test-electrode pairs were loudness balanced with the reference-electrode pairs. A two-interval forced-choice same-different procedure was then used to determine discriminability of the reference-electrode pair from the nearest, apical, test-electrode pair. If P(C)max was <0.707 at all three levels, additional testing was done using the next, more apical, electrode pair as the test-electrode pair. A tendency toward better discrimination at more apical regions of the array was observed. Electrode pairs with poor discrimination typically had smaller dynamic ranges than those with good discrimination. There was a weak tendency toward better discrimination at higher levels of stimulation. However, effects of level on electrode-place discrimination were less pronounced and less consistent than previously observed effects of level on temporal discriminations. These results suggest interactions between current spread and the condition of the implanted cochlea as underlying mechanisms.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the operating characteristics of the Nucleus 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant including speech recognition results., Study Design: This was a prospective randomized study involving five different modes of stimulation., Setting: This study was carried out in an academic, tertiary referral center., Patients: The patients included in this study were adult cochlear implant candidates ages 44-74 years. Length of deafness ranged from 1 to 58 years with a variety of etiologies., Interventions: All patients were implanted with a 20 + 2L implant, which includes an intrascalar electrode array and an apically placed extracochlear, titanium encased ball electrode in contact with the endosteum of the apical turn. All patients underwent psychophysical and speech recognition testing in five different modes of electrode configuration., Main Outcome Measure(s): The main outcome measures included thresholds, comfort levels, dynamic ranges, and speech recognition results obtained in five electrode configuration modes., Results: Thresholds were significantly lower (repeated measures ANOVA) in both monopolar conditions when compared to bipolar mode of stimulation. A binomial statistical analysis indicated that in five of nine patients activated in all five modes of stimulation, the monopolar modes of stimulation resulted in improved speech recognition scores., Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate the feasibility of the use of an apical lateral cochlear wall electrode in conjunction with an intrascalar electrode array. It further demonstrated the superiority of monopolar stimulation in selected patients.

This study investigated the relationship between electrode discrimination and speech recognition in 11 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects who were implanted with the Nucleus/Cochlear Corporation multichannel device. The discriminability of each electrode included in a subject's clinical map was measured using adaptive and fixed-level discrimination tasks. Considerable variability in electrode discriminability was observed across subjects. Two subjects could discriminate all electrodes, and discrimination performance by the remaining nine subjects varied from near perfect to very poor. In these nine subjects, the results obtained from the discrimination tasks were used to create a map that contained only discriminable electrodes, and subjects' performance on speech recognition tasks using this experimental map was measured. Four different speech recognition tests were administered: a nine-choice closed-set medial vowel recognition task, a 14-choice closed-set medial consonant recognition task, the NU6 Monosyllabic Words Test [T. W. Tillman and T. Carhart, Tech. Rep. No. SAM-TR-66-55, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas (1966)] scored for both words and phonemes correct, and the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) Everyday Sentences test [H. Davis and S. R. Silverman, Hearing and Deafness (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1978)]. Seven of the nine subjects tested with the experimental map showed significant improvement on at least one speech recognition measure, even though the experimental map contained fewer electrodes than the original map. Three subjects' scores improved significantly on the CID Everyday Sentences test, three subjects' scores improved significantly on the NU6 Monosyllabic Words test, and five subjects' scores improved significantly on the NU6 Monosyllabic Words test scored for phonemes correct. None of the subjects' scores improved significantly on either the vowel or consonant tests. No significant correlation was observed between electrode discrimination ability and speech recognition scores or between electrode discrimination ability and improvement in speech recognition scores when programmed with the experimental map. The results of this study suggest that electrode discrimination tasks may be used to improve speech recognition of some cochlear implant subjects, and that each electrode site does not necessarily provide perceptually distinct information.

Objective: To summarize the current applications of auditory evoked potential in children with cochlear implants and candidates for implantation., Patients and Methods: Perioperative transtympanic EABR is used routinely for ear selection and to establish the electrical stimulability of the ear intended to be implanted. The perioperative transtympanic EABR is supplemented with EABR obtained immediately following the insertion of the electrode array and the seating of the implant's receiver. Postoperatively, EABR and averaged electrode voltages are used effectively to properly adjust the implant stimulus parameters and to determine whether the implant is functioning adequately. Postoperatively, cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli may also be obtained., Results: EABR results have contributed to effective implant placement and function. There were several significant correlations between speech recognition and cognitive evoked potential., Conclusion: These measures help assure proper implant function and effective stimulus delivery.

We investigated late and cognitive (mismatch negativity, P300) auditory potentials in 14 children with cochlear implants between the ages of 4 and 12 years. Length of cochlear implant use ranged from 7 to 84 months. Three types of stimulus contrasts were used: (1) a loudness contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst presented at 75 (standard) and 90 dB sound pressure level (deviant); (2) a frequency contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst (standard) and a 3000 Hz tone burst (deviant) presented at 80 dB sound pressure level; and (3) a speech contrast consisting of "heed" (standard) and "who'd" (deviant) delivered with a roving loudness paradigm involving a randomized variation of the levels of the standard and deviant stimuli. Latencies and amplitudes of components N1, P2, N2, and P3 and a mismatch negativity were measured. Overall, there were very few missing or unidentifiable components. P3 and mismatch negativity components were identified for all subjects and all stimuli. The latencies of most components were affected by stimulus type. There was a trend for longer latencies for the speech contrast compared with the loudness or frequency contrasts. This may be a reflection of the increased processing time required for the speech stimuli because of its higher complexity. There were several significant correlations between speech recognition and cognitive evoked potential latencies. These results indicate that the clinical use of cognitive evoked potentials in children with cochlear implants is feasible and informative.

The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between variation in electrode site of stimulation and the perceptual dimensions along which such stimuli vary. This information may allow more effective use of electrode place when encoding speech information. To achieve this goal, two procedures which measure pitch in subjects implanted with the Nucleus/Cochlear Corporation multichannel device were performed. Estimates of electrode discriminability that can be obtained from these procedures were compared to a more direct measure of electrode discriminability that was obtained in a previous study [Collins et al., Assoc. Res. Otolaryng. Abstracts, No. 642 (1994)]. In the first task, subjects performed a pitch ranking procedure similar to that used in previous studies [Townshend et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 106-115 (1987); Nelson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1987-1999 (1995)]. Estimates of the pitch percept elicited by stimulation of each electrode as well as the discriminability of the electrodes were generated from the data using two different statistical analyses. In the second task, subjects performed a pitch scaling procedure similar to one used in a previous study [Busby et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2658-2669 (1994)]. Again, two different statistical analyses were performed to generate estimates of the pitch percept corresponding to stimulation of each electrode and to generate estimates of electrode discriminability. In general, the estimates of the relationships between the pitch percepts obtained from the two procedures were not identical. In addition, the estimates of electrode discriminability were not equivalent to the electrode discrimination measures obtained from the same subjects during the previous study. Signal detection theory has been used to model the decision processes required by each of the procedures described above [e.g., Jesteadt and Bilger, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 1266-1276 (1974)]. However, these models do not predict the differences that were observed between the data sets obtained during this study. An alternate model is proposed which may explain the data obtained from these subjects. This model is based on the assumption that the percept that is elicited by electrical stimulation of an electrode is multidimensional, as opposed to unidimensional in nature. Therefore, the perceived signal is more appropriately modeled using a multidimensional random vector, where each element of the vector represents the perceived value of one of the dimensions of the signal.

A within-subjects comparison of monopolar versus bipolar stimulation was performed using a modified version of the Nucleus mini-22 cochlear implant, the Nucleus "20 + 2" implant. Six subjects underwent implantation with this device, which is identical to the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant with the addition of two extracochlear indifferent electrodes. These electrodes provide two monopolar modes of stimulation in addition to the standard bipolar modes used with the Nucleus 22 device. One of the indifferent electrodes is a ball placed under the temporalis muscle (MP1), whereas the second electrode is mounted on the lateral aspect of the receiver-stimulator (MP2). After a pre-experimental phase, subjects used each of three stimulation modes (BP + 1, MP1, and MP2) for a total of 4 weeks each. Variables tested with each mode included electric thresholds, comfort levels, dynamic ranges, and speech recognition. Both the MP1 and MP2 modes of stimulation required significantly less current than the bipolar mode (BP + 1) to reach threshold and comfort level. Analysis of dynamic range data also indicated a significant stimulation mode effect. However, stimulation in the various modes did not significantly affect speech recognition scores, although two subjects demonstrated significantly improved speech recognition scores when programmed in a monopolar mode.

Psychophysical detection of electrical stimulation of the cochlea was studied as a function of electrical-current configuration. Subjects were postlingually deaf humans with Nucleus 20 + 2, Nucleus 22, and Ineraid cochlear implants and nonhuman primates unilaterally deafened and implanted with a multielectrode array similar to the Nucleus implant. In nonhuman primate and human Ineraid subjects, which had percutaneous connectors, we compared threshold functions for sinusoids and pulse trains for quadrupolar, bipolar, monopolar, and parallel multipolar stimulation. Thresholds decreased across this set of configurations. In some cases, the effects of current configuration were dependent on sinusoidal frequency and pulse duration. Pulse duration-dependent effects were also seen when comparing bipolar, monopolar, and common-ground configurations. Bipolar and monopolar stimulation were compared in Nucleus subjects using pulse trains at 50 microseconds per phase. For bipolar stimulation, thresholds decreased as a function of electrode separation, reaching a level near that for monopolar stimulation at separations of 3.5 to 6.5 mm in most cases. These results may be interpreted in terms of effects of current configuration on the magnitude and shape of electrical-potential fields produced in the cochlea, although more central factors also play a role in determining psychophysical detection thresholds.

Objective: To report operative findings, postoperative course, and postimplantation performance in patients with cochlear malformations who underwent cochlear implantation., Design: Case study and intervention study (before-after trial). Minimum follow-up of 12 months; average follow-up of 24 months., Setting: Academic tertiary referral center., Patients: Six patients, including five children who underwent implantation at ages 3.5 to 13 years and one adult who underwent implantation at age 27 years. malformations included common cavity deformity (n = 1), cochlear hypoplasia (n = 2), and incomplete partition (n = 3). All patients with cochlear malformations who underwent implantation at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, are included, selected from a group of 196 patients so treated since 1986., Intervention: Implantation with a standard multichannel cochlear implant., Main Outcome Measures: Operative findings described include round window and facial nerve anatomy and cerebrospinal fluid leak. Postoperative roentgenographic findings, electrode activation, and reason for non-use of electrodes were investigated. Standard tests of speech perception were used to compare preoperative and postoperative performance for each subject., Results: Operative findings included round window abnormalities (three patients), anomalous facial nerve (one patient), and cerebrospinal fluid leak (three patients). No surgical complications occurred. A minimum of 10 electrodes were activated for all patients. Electrode thresholds and discomfort levels were variable for several months after implantation. All patients demonstrated improved performance after implantation. Four subjects demonstrated open-set speech perception. Two other subjects, whose poor language skills precluded administration of standard tests, showed increased awareness of environmental sounds and increased vocalization after implantation., Conclusions: Cochlear implantation can be a successful method of rehabilitation in patients with congenital deafness who have cochlear malformations.

Complete, irreversible failure of the implanted receiver-stimulator of the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant are relatively rare. However, as the implanted patient population grows, malfunctions may be expected. From the over 200 patients implanted at the University of Michigan Medical Center, 6 patients with a complete and irreversible cochlear implant receiver-stimulator failure have been identified and treated. This represents a 3% failure rate. The amount of time between initial implantation and device failure ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years. Determination of device failure was made using psychophysical, electrophysiologic, and averaged electrode voltage measurements. The measurement of the average electrode voltages proved to be useful in determining the condition of the implant. Physiologic changes causing reduced electrical excitability were ruled out using psychophysical or electrophysiologic promontory testing. All patients were successfully explanted and reimplanted.

Objective: To study the feasibility and clinical applicability of preoperative, transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response (EABR) in a pediatric patient population with cochlear implants., Design: A descriptive study using repeated measures analyses of variance to determine if EABR measures were affected by response configuration or cochlear status., Setting: The operating room before cochlear implant surgery., Patients: A population-based sample of 43 patients aged 2.5 to 14.5 years who were candidates for cochlear implantation., Intervention: Stimuli consisting of brief balanced biphasic current pulses were provided by a transtympanically placed promontory needle electrode; EABR was recorded with subdermal needle electrodes on the forehead and contralateral mastoid., Main Outcome Measure: Presence or absence of postoperative electrical excitability with a cochlear implant., Results: Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem responses were available from 41 of the 43 patients tested. Mean EABR threshold was 406.5 microA (SD = 118.1) for 31 patients with patent cochleas and 472 microA (SD = 91) for 10 patients with cochlear ossification. Mean wave V latency at threshold was 4.69 milliseconds (SD = 0.57)., Conclusion: Preoperative EABR is an integral component of the preoperative selection process for pediatric patients with cochlear implants.

Frequency difference limens were determined as a function of reference-stimulus level for pulsatile electrical stimuli in 5 postlingually deaf human subjects with Nucleus-22 cochlear implants and for sinusoidally amplitude-modulated acoustic white noise stimuli in 4 normal-hearing humans. Subjects were tested at levels throughout the dynamic range and extending to the lowest detectable levels. Response stability was measured over the course of 10 sessions. For electrical stimulation in the deaf ears, difference limens decreased as a function of level throughout much or all of the dynamic range of hearing. This result contrasts with the case for nonspectral acoustic stimulation of normal-hearing subjects, where nonspectral frequency difference limens were strongly affected by level only near the detection threshold. These data suggest differences in the acoustic and electrical response spaces that must be considered in the design of auditory prosthesis processors.

Numerous reports indicate that the cochlea remains responsive to electrical stimulation following labyrinthectomy. We report a case of a 47-year-old woman with a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss from birth, who developed episodic vertigo with symptoms suggestive of delayed onset endolymphatic hydrops. Following 8 months of failed medical and vestibular rehabilitation management, a right-sided labyrinthectomy combined with cochlear implantation was performed without complication. Postoperatively the patient was free of vertigo. Attempts to activate the patient's device between 4 to 12 weeks after surgery were unsuccessful as stimulation of the electrodes resulted in discomfort. However, all 20 electrodes elicited comfortable hearing sensations 16 weeks postsurgery. One year after the successful activation, the patient demonstrated improved sound awareness and speech recognition with the implant when compared with preoperative performance with a hearing aid. This case study suggests that electrical detection thresholds with prosthetic stimulation may be unstable in the recently labyrinthectomized ear but supports and extends prior observations of preserved cochlear responsiveness after labyrinthectomy.

Detection thresholds for biphasic symmetric pulses were measured in fourteen human subjects implanted with the Cochlear Corporation Nucleus 22 Implant. The effects of phase duration on thresholds were studied using single pulses, and 500 ms pulse trains at 100 pps. Psychophysical detection thresholds decreased as a function of phase duration with a change in slope at approximately 0.5 ms/phase. Mean single-pulse and pulse-train slopes were -3.60 and -4.25 dB/doubling of phase duration for pulse durations of less than about 0.5 ms/phase. For pulse durations greater than 0.5 ms/phase, mean slopes were -5.71 and -7.54 dB/doubling for single pulses and pulse trains, respectively. Thresholds for pulse trains decreased as a function of stimulus duration for durations up to at least 300 ms, with the rate of decrease being dependent on the phase duration of the pulse. Effects of stimulus duration were greater for longer phase duration signals. We hypothesize that the longer phase duration pulses activate multiple spikes in a single fiber and/or more effective patterns of spikes across fibers, which may explain why slopes of psychophysical threshold functions are steeper than those of functions for single auditory nerve fibers for longer duration pulses. Thresholds were compared to respective speech perception scores (CID sentences) since thresholds for long phase duration signals have been shown previously to be correlated with nerve survival patterns, and nerve survival patterns may affect speech perception. Correlation coefficients ranged from -0.59 to -0.81, depending on stimulus parameters and subject selection.

The effects of cochlear implant on loudness, annoyance, daily duration, location, and residual inhibition of tinnitus were evaluated by a closed-ended, quantifiable questionnaire in 33 postlingually deafened patients who had received implants at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, between 1986 and 1990. Preoperative tinnitus was present in 85% of patients. A statistical comparison of preoperative vs postoperative loudness and annoyance indicated a significant reduction in both of these complaints postoperatively. Loudness and annoyance were significantly correlated, both preoperatively and postoperatively. Fifteen patients (54%) with preoperative tinnitus demonstrated a loudness decrease of 30% or more; 43% demonstrated an annoyance decrease of 30% or more; and 48% demonstrated a decrease of 30% or more in daily tinnitus duration. Patients who experienced a loudness or annoyance decrease of 30% or more after implantation demonstrated significantly higher preoperative levels of these complaints, suggesting that degree of tinnitus reduction after implantation may be related to preoperative loudness and annoyance levels. Contralateral tinnitus suppression was reported by 42% of patients. Residual inhibition ranging from 60 seconds to several hours was reported by 50% of patients, predominantly in the ear with the implant. Age, gender, cause of hearing loss, duration of tinnitus, cochlear implant usage, and time after implantation were not predictive of tinnitus suppression. Overall, the majority of the patients (74%) thought that their cochlear implant was helpful in tinnitus suppression, especially in the ear with the implant. Contralateral residual inhibition and tinnitus suppression suggest a central mechanism contributing to these phenomena.

The effects of active channel number and place of stimulation on auditory-only performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel cochlear implant were investigated in seven subjects. A balanced crossover design was employed; subjects were initially programmed with either 10 basal or the full complement of 20 to 21 active electrodes. Following a 6-month period with the initial coding strategy, subjects were programmed with the alternate configuration, which they used for an additional 6 months. Auditory-only performance on suprasegmental, phoneme (vowel and consonant) open- and closed-set speech recognition was compared between the two electrode configurations. Additionally, performance with the first configuration and performance with the second configuration 3 days following programming were also compared. While a trend for increased scores was noted with 20 electrodes, especially with open-set speech recognition tasks, none of the differences between the two configurations reached statistical significance, as indicated by a Wilcoxon test. A comparison of performance at the end of the first 6-month period and 3 days following programming with the second configuration revealed a trend for reduced scores, especially on vowel tests. Overall, our results indicate that the feature extraction coding strategy associated with the Cochlear Corporation device allows patients to function well with only 10 basal electrodes and that speech recognition is only mildly affected initially when patients are programmed with a different encoding strategy.

In 1981, our group, as part of a Food and Drug Administration investigator team directed by William House, performed Illinois' first cochlear implantation. We have since performed cochlear implantations in ten other persons. Since May 1980, approximately 35 severely to profoundly deaf persons per year have been referred to our clinic for evaluation. A small number of these patients had far-advanced otosclerosis. In these cases, exploratory tympanotomy and stapedectomy followed by rehabilitation with a hearing aid was a more appropriate management than cochlear implantation. Case histories and a temporal bone study of far-advanced otosclerosis are presented.