Search

BACKGROUND: Sliding hiatal herniation (SHH) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) commonly occur in French bulldogs. Wireless pH monitoring can quantitatively assess acidic GER in dogs affected by SHH. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Measure acidic GER in French bulldogs with SHH, pre- and post-brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery, utilizing a wireless pH capsule (Bravo Calibration-free, Medtronic, Minnesota), and correlate with owners observations of regurgitation. ANIMALS: Eleven French bulldogs diagnosed with SHH via swallowing fluoroscopy. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. A pH capsule was endoscopically placed in the esophagus. Up to 96 hours of data were acquired as the owner logged clinical signs. Spearmans correlation and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated factors correlated with acid exposure time (AET), defined by the % time pH

Background: Historically, DeMeester score over 14.7 has been used to diagnose GERD. The 2022 American Gastroenterological Association clinical guidelines define GERD based on acid exposure time (AET) instead of DeMeester score. We aim to compare outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients based on differing GERD diagnostic criteria. Methods: Patients who underwent first-time LNF between 2009 and 2017 were identified. Demographics, objective GERD evaluation, and outcomes were maintained in an IRB-approved database. Disease-specific quality of life was assessed with a survey (GERD-HRQL) with higher values representing more symptomatic disease. Descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact test and logistic regression were used to analyze the data, p-value < 0.05. Results: 225 patients were stratified into two groups: borderline GERD (AET 4–6%, n = 25.11%) and GERD (AET ≥ 6%, n = 200.89%). The mean age was 50.1 ± 13.4 years and 169 (75%) were female. Baseline GERD-HRQL was lower in the borderline group (24.3 vs 30.0, p = 0.031). Short-term (5 weeks [IQR 4, 8]), medium-term (14 months [IQR 7.25, 31]) and long-term (6.75 years [IQR 5.5, 8]) follow-up was performed. GERD-HRQL scores did not differ between borderline and GERD patients at short-(6.0 vs 7.1, p = 0.630), medium-(12.0 vs 12.1, p = 0.818), or long-term follow-up (10.0 vs 9.0, p = 0.757). The absolute long-term improvement in GERD-HRQL was −12.3 (p = 0.022) vs. −21.3 (p < 0.001). At long-term follow-up there was no difference in PPI use (50% vs 47%, p = 0.852), satisfaction (58% vs 76%, p = 0.187), willingness to repeat the procedure given the benefit of hindsight (75% vs 85%, p = 0.386), or need for reoperation (14% vs 13%, p = 0.910). Conclusion: Both patients with borderline GERD and GERD achieve GERD-HRQL improvements at 7 years following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and demonstrate similar long-term PPI usage and satisfaction with surgical results. Borderline GERD patients have lower GERD-HRQL at baseline, and thus have smaller improvements in their QOL scores. Anti-reflux surgery should be considered for patients with a diagnosis of borderline GERD refractory to medical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: The measurement of esophageal acid exposure time (AET) using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII‐pH) tests is the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, this catheter‐based 24‐h test can cause considerable patient discomfort. Our aim is to identify factors affecting AET and to develop a scoring model for predicting AET abnormalities before conducting the MII‐pH test. Methods: Of the 366 patients who underwent MII‐pH test at two facilities in Japan and Vietnam, 255 patients who also had esophagogastroduodenoscopy and high‐resolution manometry were included in this study. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using risk factors for AET > 6% identified from a derivation cohort (n = 109). A scoring system predicting AET > 6% was then constructed and externally validated with a separate cohort (n = 146). Results: Three variables were derived from the prediction model: male gender, Hill grades III–IV, and weak mean distal contractile integrals. Based on these scores, patients were classified into low (0 point), intermediate (1–3 points), and high (4 points) risk groups. The probabilities of having an AET > 6% were 6%, 34%, and 100% for these groups, respectively. A score of < 1 excluded patients with abnormal AET, with a negative predictive value of 93.8% in the derivation cohort and 80.0% in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We derived and externally validated a prediction model for abnormal AET. This system could assist in guiding the appropriate treatment strategies for GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: In this manuscript, we aim to review the proposed mechanisms of the pathophysiology of functional heartburn (FH) and functional chest pain (FCP) as well as highlight the different neuromodulatory therapies available to providers and the evidence for each of them. Recent Findings: Understanding the basis for the symptoms that patients are presenting with is essential when evaluating patients with possible esophageal motility disorders or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Objective testing to understand these conditions is a key component to that understanding. Patients undergoing evaluation for heartburn or chest pain, following cardiac evaluation, often require a combination of endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and pH testing. Treatment for FH or FCP often involves some combination of neuromodulatory pharmacologic or behavioral therapies based on their understood pathophysiology. Summary: When a diagnosis of functional heartburn or functional chest pain is reached, it is important for the managing provider to understand the available therapeutic options. Often, treatment requires management with neuromodulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pathophysiology has been established in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, less is understood regarding the role the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays in preventing laryngopharynphageal reflux. Sustained UES basal pressure prevents reflux into the pharynx while allowing relaxation during ingestion. We investigate whether GERD influences UES function via HRM and pH Impedance testing. A retrospective analysis of 318 patients who underwent high‐resolution manometry with trans‐nasally placed manometric catheter and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. One hundred and forty‐seven patients met Lyon consensus criteria for GERD based on acid exposure time >6%. The most common chief concern was heartburn or reflux, present in 59% of these patients. Upper esophageal sphincter basal and residual pressures were not significantly different between patients with GERD when compared to those without GERD, including a subanalysis of patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The LES basal and residual pressures, DCI and MNBI are statistically lower in patients with pathologic GERD. HRM and pH Impedance testing demonstrates no difference in UES basal and residual pressures based on pH diagnosis of GERD. We redemonstrate the association with hypotonic LES, diminished DCI and MNBI with GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Sliding hiatal herniation (SHH) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) commonly occur in French bulldogs. Wireless pH monitoring can quantitatively assess acidic GER in dogs affected by SHH. Hypothesis/Objectives Measure acidic GER in French bulldogs with SHH, pre‐ and post‐brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery, utilizing a wireless pH capsule (Bravo Calibration‐free, Medtronic, Minnesota), and correlate with owners' observations of regurgitation. Animals Eleven French bulldogs diagnosed with SHH via swallowing fluoroscopy. Methods Prospective cohort study. A pH capsule was endoscopically placed in the esophagus. Up to 96 hours of data were acquired as the owner logged clinical signs. Spearman's correlation and Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests evaluated factors correlated with acid exposure time (AET), defined by the % time pH

Abstract Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pathophysiology has been established in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, less is understood regarding the role the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays in preventing laryngopharynphageal reflux. Sustained UES basal pressure prevents reflux into the pharynx while allowing relaxation during ingestion. We investigate whether GERD influences UES function via HRM and pH Impedance testing. A retrospective analysis of 318 patients who underwent high‐resolution manometry with trans‐nasally placed manometric catheter and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. One hundred and forty‐seven patients met Lyon consensus criteria for GERD based on acid exposure time >6%. The most common chief concern was heartburn or reflux, present in 59% of these patients. Upper esophageal sphincter basal and residual pressures were not significantly different between patients with GERD when compared to those without GERD, including a subanalysis of patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The LES basal and residual pressures, DCI and MNBI are statistically lower in patients with pathologic GERD. HRM and pH Impedance testing demonstrates no difference in UES basal and residual pressures based on pH diagnosis of GERD. We redemonstrate the association with hypotonic LES, diminished DCI and MNBI with GERD.

Background: The contributions of swallowing and belching to specific gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) phenotypes are unclear. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed esophageal pH/impedance studies, comparing reflux events preceded by gastric belching (GB), supragastric belching (SGB), air swallowing, and liquid/solid swallowing based on reflux position, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and acid exposure time (AET). Key Results: 20 GERD patients and 10 controls were studied. Upright GERD patients and controls had a higher proportion of reflux events with a preceding swallow or belch (0.64, 0.64) than the supine group (0.38, p = 0.043). The upright group and controls trended toward a higher proportion of reflux events preceded by overall swallowing (0.61, 0.50) and air swallowing (0.55, 0.48) than the supine group (0.32, 0.31 p = 0.064, p = 0.11), but the three groups had similar rates of liquid/solid swallowing (0.032, 0.024, 0.017, p = 0.69). LES pressure did not correlate with reflux events preceded by swallowing (R2 = 0.021, p = 0.44). There was a higher rate of events preceded by gastric belching in the control group (0.14) than in the upright (0.032) and supine groups (0.066, p = 0.049). LES pressure did not correlate with the rate of events preceded by belching (R2 = 0.000093, p = 0.96). Normal AET patients had a higher rate of events preceded by GB (0.12) than those with increased acid exposure (0.030, p = 0.0083), but the two groups had similar rates of preceding air (0.43, 0.47, p = 0.68), liquid/solid (0.018, 0.032, p = 0.30), and overall swallowing (0.44, 0.53, p = 0.38). Conclusions and Inferences: Swallowing more than belching is a dominant mechanism for reflux irrespective of GERD position, LES pressure, and AET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is classified into 3 anatomical subtypes according to lower esophageal sphincter-crural diaphragm (LES-CD) separation. We aimed to assess their relationship to esophageal motility, reflux characteristics, and symptom perception. Methods: We analyzed data from 1740 consecutive patients with typical reflux symptoms, who underwent high resolution manometry and a 24-h pH-impedance study during a 13-year period. A diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was made if acid exposure time (AET) was >6%. EGJ types were classified as 1, 2, or 3, if LES-CD separation was up to 1 cm, 1-3 cm, or =3 cm, respectively. Results: EGJ type distribution was 72.2%, 22.1% and 5.7%, for types 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GERD was diagnosed in 31.2% and was more common among patients with EGJ type 2/3 vs. 1 (P<0.001). Length of LES-CD separation significantly correlated with AET and number of reflux episodes. Patients with type 2 or 3 EGJ more often showed ineffective or absent peristalsis compared with type 1 (P=0.008 and P<0.001 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, EGJ type 2/3 correlated with AET (P=0.001) and reflux episodes (P=0.041) but not with positive symptomatic markers or with ineffective/absent peristalsis. Conclusions: Our study confirms that EGJ anatomical morphology is a strong risk factor for GERD and correlates with both AET and the number of reflux events, though the length of separation is more important than the type. The multivariate analysis revealed that EGJ type 2 or 3 was not correlated with symptom perception or esophageal hypomotility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) values support gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis. Recent data denote that age and obesity may affect MNBI. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic MNBI cutoffs as also the effect of aging and body mass index (BMI) on MNBI. Methods: In total 311 patients (M/F: 139/172, mean age: 47 ± 13) referred for typical GERD symptoms that have undertaken both high‐resolution manometry (HRM) and pH‐Impedance studies off PPI were evaluated. MNBI at 3, 5, and 17 cm over lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated. GERD was diagnosed if acid exposure time (AET) >6%. Results: Mean BMI was 26.6 ± 5.9 kg/cm2. GERD was diagnosed in 39.2% and 13.5% had inconclusive GERD. MNBI was correlated to patients' age, BMI, AET, and the length of LES‐CD separation and at 3 cm also to the total number of reflux and LES hypotension. In the multivariate analysis MNBI at 3 and 5 cm was independently correlated only to age, BMI, and AET. Patients with definite GERD showed lower MNBI at 3 cm compared with inconclusive GERD though both showed lower values when compared with GERD absence. At 3 cm MNBI ability for diagnosing GERD was good (0.815, p < 0.001 95% CI: 0.766–0.863) with an optimal cutoff point of 1281 Ohm. Conclusion: According to our study findings age and BMI affect independently lower esophageal MNBI values in patients evaluated for GERD. MNBI significantly aids toward GERD diagnosis though in a real‐life setting MNBI values much lower than the one previously proposed should be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Criteria to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) vary. The American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) 2022 Expert Review on GERD focuses on acid exposure time (AET) rather than DeMeester score from ambulatory pH testing (BRAVO). We aim to review outcomes following anti-reflux surgery (ARS) at our institution, grouped by differing criteria for the diagnosis of GERD. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective gastroesophageal quality database was performed for all patients undergoing evaluation for ARS with preoperative BRAVO ≥ 48 h. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests and two-tailed statistical significance of p < 0.05. Results: Between 2010 and 2022, 253 patients underwent an evaluation for ARS with BRAVO testing. Most patients (86.9%) met our institution's historical criteria: LA C/D esophagitis, Barrett's, or DeMeester ≥ 14.72 on 1+ days. Fewer patients (67.2%) met new AGA criteria: LA B/C/D esophagitis, Barrett's, or AET ≥ 6% on 2+ days. Sixty-one patients (24%) met historical criteria only, with significantly lower BMI, ASA, less hiatal hernias, and less DeMeester and AET-positive days, a less severe GERD phenotype. There were no differences between groups in perioperative outcomes or % symptom resolution. Objective GERD outcomes (need for dilation, esophagitis, and postop BRAVO) were equivalent between groups. Patient-reported quality of life scores, including GERD-HRQL, RSI, and Dysphagia Score did not differ between groups from preop through 1 year postop. Those who met our historical criteria only reported significantly worse RSI scores (p = 0.03) and worse GERD-HRQL scores at 2 years postop, though not statistically significant (p = 0.07). Conclusion: Updated AGA GERD guidelines exclude a portion of patients who historically would have been diagnosed with and surgically treated for GERD. This cohort appears to have a less severe GERD phenotype but equivalent outcomes up to 1 year, with more atypical GERD symptoms at 2 years postop. AET may better define who should be offered ARS than DeMeester score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The impact of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unknown, and abnormal esophageal motility often coexists with abnormal gastric motility. We aimed to investigate the role of IEM in GERD and its relationship with gastric electrical activity. Methods: Patients diagnosed as GERD based on GERD‐questionnaire score ≥8 in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were included. All patients underwent 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH monitoring, high‐resolution manometry, and electrogastrogram and were categorized into the normal esophageal motility (NEM) and IEM groups, respectively. Reflux characteristics and gastric electric activity were compared between the two groups, and the correlation between gastric electric activity and reflux was analyzed. Results: Acid exposure time, total reflux episodes, and DeMeester score in the IEM group were higher than those in the NEM group. Distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance was significantly lower in the IEM group. Compared with the NEM group, the power ratio (PR) of fundus, antrum and pylorus and premeal and postmeal normal wave ratio of antrum were significantly lower in IEM. The total reflux episodes were negatively correlated with the PR of fundus and pylorus, and the DeMeester score was negatively correlated with the PR of corpus and pylorus. Conclusions: IEM may lead to increased reflux, resulting in esophageal mucosal damage. There may be consistency between abnormal esophageal motility and gastric motility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Introduction/aim: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects 8–33% globally. The gold standard examination technique in diagnosing GERD is 24 h pHmetry ± impedance. Recently, new diagnostic criteria were introduced by the Lyon Consensus for GERD diagnosis. Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic yield of pHmetry + impedance using the Lyon Consensus criteria in a real-world study. (2) Patients and methods: Our study included 249 consecutive patients (M/F: 120/129, mean age 50 ± 15 years) who underwent 24 h pH+ impedance monitoring in our department, during a 5-year period. Epidemiological, endoscopic, clinical, and 24 h pH+ impedance data were retrospectively collected. (3) Results: Typical GERD symptoms were reported by 140/249 (56.2%) patients, whereas 99/249 (39.6%) patients reported various extraesophageal symptoms. Endoscopic findings supportive of GERD based on the Lyon Consensus were present in 42/185 (22.7%). An AET value of >6% was observed in 60/249 (24.1%). GERD diagnosis according to the Lyon Consensus criteria was set in 63/249 (25.3%) patients; a rate significantly lower than that observed by implementing the older criteria (32.1%), p < 0.001. In the multivariate analysis, the existence of endoscopic findings supportive of GERD diagnosis as defined by the Lyon Consensus (p = 0.036), a De Meester score of over 14.7, and the presence of typical GERD symptoms were correlated to GERD diagnosis (p < 0.001, respectively) using the criteria defined for pH–impedance monitoring. (4) Conclusions: Changes in the diagnostic criteria concerning the 24 h pH–impedance monitoring of GERD based on the Lyon Consensus led to a conclusive GERD diagnosis in approximately 25% of the patients. This rate of GERD diagnosis is reduced in comparison to the one confirmed with the use of previously established criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acid exposure time (AET) and reflux episode thresholds from the Lyon Consensus may not apply for pH impedance studies performed while on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. We aimed to determine metrics from "on PPI" pH impedance studies predicting need for escalation of therapy. De-identified pH impedance studies performed while on twice-daily PPI (Diversatek, Boulder, CO) in healthy volunteers (n = 66, median age 37.5 years, 43.9% female), and patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (European heartburn-predominant cohort: n = 43, median age 57.0 years, 55.8% female; North American regurgitation-predominant cohort: n = 42, median age 41.6 years, 42.9% female) were analyzed. Median values and interquartile ranges for pH impedance metrics in healthy volunteers were compared with proven GERD patients with and without 50% symptom improvement on validated measures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified optimal thresholds predicting symptom response. Both conventional and novel reflux metrics were similar between PPI responders and nonresponders (P ≥. 1 for each) despite differences from healthy volunteers. Combinations of metrics associated with conclusively abnormal reflux burden (AET >4%, >80 reflux episodes) were seen in 32.6% and 40.5% of heartburn and regurgitation-predominant patients, respectively, 57.1% and 82.4% of whom reported nonresponse; and 85% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. On ROC analysis, AET threshold of 0.5% modestly predicted nonresponse (sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.51; P =.22), and 40 reflux episodes had better performance characteristics (sensitivity, 0.80; specificity, 0.51; P =.002); 79% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. Combinations of abnormal "on PPI" pH impedance metrics are associated with PPI nonresponse in proven GERD patients, and can be targeted for treatment escalation, including surgery, particularly in regurgitation-predominant GERD. [Display omitted] Lower thresholds of pH impedance metrics indicate persisting reflux when testing is performed on rather than off proton pump inhibitor therapy, and predict improvement with surgical management, especially in patients with regurgitation despite medical reflux management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease in gastroenterology outpatients. However, some patients with typical reflux symptoms does not satisfy diagnostic criteria. This study was to explore the value of adjunctive evidence from multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring and esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) in inconclusive GERD patients with acid exposure time (AET) 4–6%. Methods: Endoscopy, MII-pH monitoring and esophageal HRM were retrospectively analyzed from consecutive patients with typical reflux symptoms in a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2019. Patients were categorized as conclusive or inconclusive GERD according to AET. Adjunctive evidence for GERD diagnosis from Lyon Consensus were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 147 patients with typical reflux symptoms, conclusive GERD was found in only 31.97% of patients (N = 47). The remaining 100 patients (68.03%) were inconclusive GERD, of whom 28% (N = 28) had AET 4–6%. These patients suffered similar reflux burden and impaired esophageal movement. Inconclusive GERD patients with AET 4–6% had lots of positive adjunctive evidence from HRM and MII-pH monitoring. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839 (CI: 0.765–0.913, p < 0.001) and 0.897 (CI: 0.841–0.953, p < 0.001), respectively, better than total reflux episode (AUC of 0.55, p = 0.33). When MNBI was combined with PSPWI, the AUC was elevated to 0.910 (CI: 0.857–0.963, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Inconclusive GERD patients with AET 4–6% have similar acid burden and esophagus motility dysfunction to GERD patients. MNBI and PSPWI are pivotal adjunctive evidence for diagnosing GERD when AET is borderline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Straight leg raise (SLR) is a provocative maneuver that assesses esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function during high‐resolution manometry (HRM). We evaluated the value of SLR in symptomatic reflux patients undergoing ambulatory reflux monitoring. Methods: Adult patients being evaluated for reflux symptoms with esophageal physiologic testing off antisecretory therapy over a 12 month period were studied. Demographics, clinical presentation, HRM studies, and reflux monitoring studies were analyzed. Intra‐abdominal and intra‐esophageal pressures were extracted at baseline and during SLR from HRM studies. Acid exposure time (AET) was derived from reflux monitoring studies, and EGJ morphology and tone from HRM studies. SLR pressure metrics predicting abnormal AET were evaluated. Key Results: Of 122 patients, 70 (57.4%) had ≥50% peak intra‐abdominal pressure increase during SLR (58.0 ± 1.4 years, 75.7% female). Peak intra‐esophageal pressure gradient between baseline and SLR predicted pathologic AET when ≥100% (AUC 0.78, sensitivity 71%, specificity 75%, P <.001), seen in 60.7% with AET > 6%, but only 23.7% with AET < 4% (P =.01). Peak intra‐esophageal pressure gradient ≥100% was most discriminative in identifying abnormal acid burden in type 1 EGJ morphology (P =.005) but trended toward significance in type 2 and type 3 morphology (P =.1). Normal and abnormal EGJ contractile integral did not associate with peak intra‐esophageal pressure gradient either collectively or when subdivided by EGJ morphology (P ≥.2). Conclusions & Inferences: Analysis of intra‐esophageal pressure gradients during SLR, a simple HRM maneuver, may augment evaluation of symptomatic GERD, and provide adjunctive evidence supporting GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Although pathological acid reflux in patients with reflux symptoms is uncommon, it affects one‐third of patients with epigastric symptoms in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the relevance of esophageal and epigastric symptoms in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China. Methods: Consecutive outpatients with predominantly esophageal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, dysphagia) or predominantly epigastric symptoms (epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiety, postprandial fullness) were enrolled. Patients underwent upper endoscopy and esophageal function tests, and took proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The prevalence of GERD and PPI efficacy was assessed and compared among patients with different dominant symptoms. Results: Altogether 374 patients (244 with predominantly esophageal symptoms and 130 with predominantly epigastric symptoms) were enrolled. Patients with predominantly epigastric symptoms had a slightly lower prevalence of reflux esophagitis and pathological acid reflux but a significantly lower PPI response rate than those with predominantly esophageal symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the predominant symptom was independently associated with PPI efficacy but could not predict the objective existence of GERD. GERD was objectively found in 136 patients, 30% of whom complained of predominantly epigastric symptoms and had similar reflux profiles and symptom outcomes as patients with predominantly esophageal symptoms. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of patients with GERD complain of predominantly epigastric symptoms and have comparable reflux profiles and symptom outcomes as those with predominantly esophageal symptoms. Epigastric symptoms may be part of the diagnosis for GERD in a Chinese population. The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02506634). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abnormal acid exposure time (AET) is associated with good outcomes of symptoms from antireflux therapy. Low esophageal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is an additional marker of reflux disease. We aimed to evaluate the value of MNBI when analysis of AET produces borderline or inconclusive results. We studied a retrospective cohort of 371 patients (mean age, 54.5 ± 0.7 y; 60.0% female) who had persistent reflux symptoms after treatment and underwent ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring off antisecretory therapy at 1 tertiary center in Europe or 1 in the United States. Total AET was determined from pH impedance studies (pathologic, >6%; physiologic, <4%; borderline or inconclusive, 4%–6%). Baseline impedance values were calculated at the 5-cm impedance channel at 3 nocturnal 10-minute periods and averaged to yield MNBI (abnormal, <2292 ohms). The primary outcome was response to antireflux therapy, defined as global symptom improvement of 50% or greater on patients' answers on standardized visual analog scales. Among the 371 patients, 107 (28.8%) had pathologic AET and 234 (63.1%) had abnormal MNBI. Low MNBI was concordant in 99.1% of patients with pathologic AET, in 91.2% with borderline AET, and in 33.7% with physiologic AET. During 38.7 ± 0.8 months of follow-up evaluation, 43.0% of patients had improved symptoms with medical therapy and 76.2% had improved symptoms with surgical antireflux therapy (P <.0001). When MNBI was low, response to medical therapy did not differ significantly between patients with borderline AET and patients with pathologic AET (P =.44), but did differ significantly when each group was compared with patients with physiologic AET, regardless of whether MNBI was normal or low (P <.0001 for each comparison). When low, MNBI identifies patients with pathologic and borderline AET who respond to antireflux therapy. MNBI analysis complements AET in defining esophageal reflux burden. MNBI correlates with response of symptoms to antireflux therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AET 4-6% is a borderline gray zone that demands adjunctive data to support GERD diagnosis.[1] This study aims to evaluate if DeMeester score (DMS) may be adjunct to define GERD in the AET 4-6% zone. Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Lyon consensus; pH monitoring; DeMeester score; Acid exposure time EN Gastroesophageal reflux disease Lyon consensus pH monitoring DeMeester score Acid exposure time 2218 2220 3 10/04/21 20210901 NES 210901 Introduction Lyon consensus advocates an objective diagnosis for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on unequivocal endoscopic findings or total acid exposure time (AET) > 6% at 24-h pH monitoring. [Extracted from the article]

Background/Aims Increased salivary pepsin could indicate an increase in gastro-esophageal reflux, however, previous studies failed to demonstrate a correlation between salivary pepsin concentrations and 24-hour esophageal acid exposure. This study aims to detect the salivary pepsin and to evaluate the relationship between salivary pepsin concentrations and intercellular spaces (IS) in different gastroesophageal reflux disease phenotypes in patients. Methods A total of 45 patients and 11 healthy volunteers were included in this study. All subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-hour ambulatory multichannel impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, and salivary sampling at 3-time points during the 24-hour MII-pH monitoring. IS were measured by transmission electron microscopy, and salivary pepsin concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results The IS measurements were greater in the esophagitis (EE), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), and hypersensitive esophagus (HO) groups than in the functional heartburn (FH) and healthy volunteer groups, and significant differences were indicated. Patients with NERD and HO had higher average pepsin concentrations compared with FH patients. A weak correlation was determined between IS and salivary pepsin among patients with NERD (r = 0.669, P = 0.035). Conclusions We confirmed the presence of a higher level of salivary pepsin in patients with NERD than in patients with FH. Salivary pepsin concentrations correlated with severity of mucosal integrity impairment in the NERD group. We suggest that in patients with NERD, low levels of salivary pepsin can help identify patients with FH, in addition the higher the pepsin concentration, the more likely the severity of dilated IS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multiple rapid swallowing ( MRS) during high-resolution manometry ( HRM) is increasingly utilized as provocative test to assess esophageal peristaltic reserve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MRS response and impedance and pH ( MII-pH) parameters in endoscopy negative heartburn ( ENH) patients. Methods We enrolled consecutive ENH patients, who underwent HRM and MII-pH study, with a selected MII-pH profile: abnormal MII-pH (pH+/ MII+); normal MII-pH (pH−/ MII−). HRM was performed with 10 wet swallows ( WS) and one MRS. Mean distal contractile integral ( DCI) during WS and MRS were calculated. MII-pH parameters including acid exposure time ( AET), reflux events, baseline impedance levels ( BI) and the efficacy of chemical clearance evaluated with the postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave ( PSPW) index were measured. Key Results We analyzed 103 patients: 49 MII+/pH+ (27 male), and 54 MII−/pH− (19 male). Mean age was similar between the two groups. As expected, mean AET and number of refluxes were higher in pH+/ MII+ ( p < 0.05). HRM was normal in all selected patients. Mean DCI- WS was similar between two groups ( p = n.s.). Mean DCI- MRS- was higher in MII−/pH− vs MII+/pH+ ( p < 0.05). The increase in DCI- MRS was inversely correlated with AET (−0.699; p < 0.001) and directly correlated with BI values (0.631; p < 0.001) and PSPW index (0.626; p < 0.001). Conclusions & Inferences Following MRS, patients with abnormal impedance-pH test showed suboptimal contraction response as compared with those with normal impedance-pH test. Moreover, MRS response was inversely correlated with AET and directly correlated with BI values and PSPW index. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The following on testing for gastroesophageal reflux in the 21st century contains commentaries on wireless pH monitoring; extension of pH recording duration to 48 or 96 h; extraesophageal GERD syndromes, diagnosis paradigms, and related investigating tools; off- or on-PPI reflux monitoring in the preoperative setting; and the potential influence of PPIs on reflux parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of the acid exposure time (AET) with the DeMeester score (DMS) for gastroesophageal reflux-induced cough (GERC)., Methods: A total of 277 patients who underwent multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) were enrolled, and their clinical information and laboratory results were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic value of AET for GERC was compared with that of the DMS, symptom association probability (SAP), and symptom index (SI)., Results: A total of 236 patients met the inclusion criteria, 150 patients (63.65%) were definitely diagnosed with GERC, including 111(74%) acid GERC and 39 (26%) nonacid GERC. The optimal cutoff value of AET for diagnosing GERC was AET > 4.8%, and its diagnostic value was equal to that of DMS > 14.7 (AUC = 0.827 versus 0.818, p  = 0.519) and was superior to that of SAP (AUC = 0.827 versus 0.689, p  = 0.000) and SI (AUC = 0.827 versus 0.688, p  = 0.000). When using both DMS > 14.7 and AET > 4.8% or either of the two for the diagnosis of GERC, the diagnosis rate was not improved over using DMS > 14.7 alone. The diagnostic value of AET and DMS for acid GERC were both high and equivalent (AUC = 0.925 versus 0.922, p  = 0.95). The optimal cutoff value of AET for diagnosing acid GERC was AET > 6.2%., Conclusion: AET and DMS are both equal in discriminating GERC. A GERC diagnosis should be considered when AET > 4.8%, whereas an acid GERC diagnosis should be considered when AET > 6.2%., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Background: Association between proportions of hypomotile swallows on esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal reflux burden remains incompletely understood. We investigated relationships between hypomotility, acid exposure time (AET), and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) on ambulatory reflux monitoring. Methods: Clinical data, HRM, and ambulatory pH‐impedance studies (performed off acid suppression) from patients with persisting reflux symptoms were reviewed from five international centers. AET (abnormal > 6%) and MNBI (abnormal < 2292 ohms) were extracted from pH‐impedance studies. Distal contractile integral (DCI) designated esophageal peristalsis into normal (DCI > 450 mmHg.cm.s), fragmented (DCI > 450 mmHg.cm.s with breaks > 5 cm), weak (DCI 100‐450 mmHg.cm.s), and failed (DCI < 100 mm mmHg.cm.s) sequences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify motor associations of abnormal reflux burden. Key Results: Of 351 patients (52.1 ± 0.8 years, 67%F), 29.3% had AET > 6% and 61.8% had MNBI < 2292 ohms. On univariate analysis, both fragmented peristalsis and IEM associated with abnormal AET (P ≤.01) and MNBI (P ≤.03); reflux burden was more profound with >70% fragmented as well as ineffective sequences compared to ≤70% for each (P <.05 for each comparison). When weak and failed sequences within IEM were separately analyzed, ≥50% failed sequences predicted abnormal AET (P ≤.009), and ≥50% weak sequences did not (P =.14). On multivariate regression, ≥50% failed sequences predicted abnormal AET (P =.02), and >70% ineffective sequences trended strongly (P =.069); >70% ineffective sequences predicted abnormal MNBI (P =.046), and >70% fragmented sequences trended strongly (P =.076). Conclusions and Inferences: Breaks in esophageal peristaltic integrity seen with fragmented and failed sequences are more relevant to abnormal esophageal acid burden than weak sequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & aims: The Lyon Consensus defines LA grades C&D erosive esophagitis (EE) or acid exposure time (AET) >6% as the conclusive evidence for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, most of EE is LA grade A&B and the rate of AET exceeding 6% is low in China. We aimed to evaluate patients with EE in the Chinese population based on the Lyon Criteria. Methods: A retrospective study was performed among patients with EE who had esophageal function tests performed in a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2017. Erosive esophagitis was staged according to the Los Angeles classification. Their motor profiles from high‐resolution manometry (HRM), reflux profiles from multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH (MII‐pH) monitoring and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) efficacy were analyzed. Patients were categorized as conclusive or inconclusive GERD. Results: Among 112 patients with EE who underwent esophageal function tests, EE of LA grade C&D was found in only 4.46% (N = 5). Almost 35% (N = 37) of patients with LA grade A&B EE had AET exceeded 6%, who had good PPI response similar to those with LA grade C&D EE (77.42% vs 100%, P = .559). The remaining 70 patients (62.50%) were inconclusive GERD, of whom 56.25% responded to PPI. Inconclusive GERD patients had a wide range (7.14%‐97.14%) of positive adjunctive evidences from HRM and MII‐pH monitoring without significant correlation to PPI response rate. Conclusions: The reflux burden within patients with EE is predominantly low in China, and adjunctive HRM and MII‐pH profiles from Lyon criteria do not segregate PPI response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Limitations of existing impedance-pH thresholds include small sample size of normative studies, inclusion of artefactual pH drops and incorrect identification of impedance reflux events. We aimed to obtain new impedance-pH thresholds from expert consensus analysis of tracings from a large number of healthy subjects., Design: Of 541 studies performed worldwide using two different systems (Diversatek, USA, and Laborie, Netherlands), 150 tracings with oesophageal diagnoses, behavioural disorders and study-related artefacts were excluded. The remainder studies were subject to two reviewer consensus analysis, in-person or through video conference, consisting of editing meals and pH drops, identification of impedance reflux and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) using strict pre-established criteria and measurement of distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI)., Results: Consensus analysis was performed in 391 tracings (age 32.7 years, range 18-71, 54.2% female). Normative thresholds were significantly different between Diversatek and Laborie (total acid exposure time: 2.8% and 5%; reflux episodes: 55 and 78; MNBI at 3 cm: 1400 and 1500 ohms, at 5 cm: 1400 and 1800 ohms). Males had higher acid exposure, more reflux episodes and lower MNBI. Significant regional differences were identified, including higher PSPW scores in Western countries, and higher MNBI in Asia using Diversatek, and higher acid exposure in the Netherlands, higher MNBI in Asia and South Africa, and lower MNBI in Turkey using Laborie., Conclusion: Normal impedance-pH monitoring thresholds have regional and system-related differences. Clinical interpretation needs to use normal thresholds valid for the system used and world region, following careful editing of the tracings., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DS receives research grants from Reckitt Benckiser UK, Jinshan Technology China and Alfa Sigma, Italy. SR: consulting Medtronic, research support Diversatek Healthcare, Medtronic; ES: Lecture Fee: Medtronic, Takeda, Janssen, MSD, Abbvie, Malesci; Consulting: Medtronic, Takeda, Janssen, MSD, Reckitt Bencikser, Sofar, Unifarco, SILA, Oftagest. CPG consults for Medtronic, Diversatek, Ironwood, IsoThrive and Quintiles., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background/aims: Increased salivary pepsin could indicate an increase in gastro-esophageal reflux, however, previous studies failed to demonstrate a correlation between salivary pepsin concentrations and 24-hour esophageal acid exposure. This study aims to detect the salivary pepsin and to evaluate the relationship between salivary pepsin concentrations and intercellular spaces (IS) in different gastroesophageal reflux disease phenotypes in patients., Methods: A total of 45 patients and 11 healthy volunteers were included in this study. All subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-hour ambulatory multichannel impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, and salivary sampling at 3-time points during the 24-hour MII-pH monitoring. IS were measured by transmission electron microscopy, and salivary pepsin concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: The IS measurements were greater in the esophagitis (EE), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), and hypersensitive esophagus (HO) groups than in the functional heartburn (FH) and healthy volunteer groups, and significant differences were indicated. Patients with NERD and HO had higher average pepsin concentrations compared with FH patients. A weak correlation was determined between IS and salivary pepsin among patients with NERD ( r = 0.669, P = 0.035)., Conclusions: We confirmed the presence of a higher level of salivary pepsin in patients with NERD than in patients with FH. Salivary pepsin concentrations correlated with severity of mucosal integrity impairment in the NERD group. We suggest that in patients with NERD, low levels of salivary pepsin can help identify patients with FH, in addition the higher the pepsin concentration, the more likely the severity of dilated IS.

Background & Aims: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) contribute to episodes of reflux. Few studies have assessed the frequencies or compositions of TLESRs and reflux episodes in patients with reflux disease. We used combined high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring to analyze reflux episodes and esophageal motility in these patients, compared with those of healthy individuals., Methods: We evaluated the frequency of TLESRs and the relationship between the reflux pattern and esophageal pressures during TLESRs in 14 patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and 11 controls. Study participants underwent combined high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring before and 60 minutes after a solid and liquid meal. The diagnosis of NERD was confirmed by a 24-hour pH impedance test., Results: The frequency of TLESRs did not differ between patients with NERD and controls. In patients with NERD, TLESRs were associated more often with reflux episodes than in controls (93% ± 6% vs 66% ± 19%; P < .05). Patients with NERD had a higher percentage of pure liquid reflux episodes (33% ± 15% vs 10% ± 2%; P < .05), whereas controls had a higher percentage of mixed reflux episodes (45% ± 16% vs 67% ± 17% in patients with NERD; P < .05). Patients with NERD also had a higher percentage of reflux (liquid and mixed) associated with common cavities (74% ± 18% vs 50% ± 20% in controls; P < .05)., Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, we found that TLESRs are associated more often with reflux in patients with NERD than control subjects; this association increases when only liquid and mixed refluxes are considered. These findings indicate that factors involved in the occurrence of reflux in patients with NERD during TLESRs are different from those in healthy subjects., (Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)