Search

Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) often experience the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP), characterized by reduced myocardial perfusion despite an open coronary artery. Adenosine, a potent vasodilator, is used to aid reperfusion. To elucidate underlying molecular mechanism of this phenomenon, we investigated expression of ADORA2A and ADORA2B genes, encoding adenosine receptors, in ACS patients with NRP and non-NRP. Methods We conducted a case-control study of 102 ACS patients undergoing PPCI, including 51 patients with NRP (TIMI flow grade 0 or 1) and 51 non-NRP patients with normal flow (TIMI flow grade 2 or 3). Gene expression was measured using Real-Time PCR. Results Analysis showed significantly reduced expression of both ADORA2A and ADORA2B genes in NRP patients compared to non-NRP (p < 0.01). Furthermore, we observed a direct and moderate correlation between the two genes in NRP patients (r = 0.45, p = 0.001), whereas the correlation was stronger and more direct in non-NRP (r = 0.8, p = 0.0001). Conclusion Reduced adenosine receptor expression may contribute to the NRP in ACS patients undergoing PPCI. These findings highlighted the importance of understanding molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon to develop targeted therapies aimed at improving cardiac reperfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity among patients with ischemic heart disease. Early intervention, such as primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or thrombolysis has been shown to improve patient outcomes. However, delayed presentation in STEMI results in larger infarct size and increased complications. Objectives: This retrospective descriptive study aimed to identify factors contributing to delayed presentation in STEMI and in-patient outcomes. Methodology: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted. All the STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention at National Hospital Kandy from February 2019 to December 2019 were studied. Results: A total of 243 STEMI patients who underwent PPCI at the National Hospital Kandy from February 2019 to December 2019 were studied. Among the study population, 31.27% were delayed presenters and 68.72% were non–delayed presenters. Atypical chest pain was identified as the main reason for a delayed presentation. Female gender was not associated with delayed presentation, contrary to the findings in other studies. Diabetes mellitus and the location of the culprit lesion did not significantly contribute to delayed presentation in this study group. Complications during hospital stay and average duration of hospital stay were not significantly different between delayed and non-delayed presenters. However, delayed presenters exhibited lower left ventricular ejection fraction on discharge, which is a critical predictor of short and long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Community awareness programs are essential to minimize pre-hospital delays in STEMI presentation. Early recognition of atypical symptoms, irrespective of gender, and timely intervention are vital for improving outcomes in STEMI patients. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of other risk factors and co-morbidities on the duration of presentation in STEMI patients.

Background: The coronary no-reflow (NR) phenomenon is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). This study aimed to establish a clinical and comprehensive nomogram for predicting NR in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: The multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the NR-related factors. A nomogram was established via several clinical and biochemical factors, and the performance was evaluated via discrimination, calibration, and clinical factors. Results: The study consisted of 3041 AMI patients after pPCI, including 2129 patients in the training set (70%) and 912 patients in the validation set (30%). The NR event was 238 in the training set and 87 in the validation set. The level of N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), basophil count (BASO), neutrophil count (NEUBC), D-dimer, hemoglobin (Hb), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW.CV) in NR patients showed statistically significant differences. In the training set, the C-index was 0.712, 95% CI 0.677 to 0.748. In the validation set, the C-index was 0.663, 95% CI 0.604 to 0.722. Conclusions: A nomogram that may predict NR in AMI patients undergoing pPCI was established and validated. We hope this nomogram can be used for NR risk assessment and clinical decision-making and significantly prevent potentially impaired reperfusion associated with NR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is usually caused by a rupture in the atherosclerotic plaque, followed by platelet aggregation which ultimately leads to acute coronary artery occlusion. So far, few studies have investigated the effect of maintenance dose of Eptifibatide (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) in STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effect of maintenance dose of Eptifibatide in patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI. 264 patients who had acute chest pain suggestive of STEMI were entered in the study. All patients received the same dose of bolus dose of Eptifibatide in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Then the patients were randomly divided into two groups, one group (n = 147) received a maintenance dose of intravenous Eptifibatide (infusion of 2 μg/kg/min) and the other group (n = 117) did not receive this treatment. Standard medical treatment of STEMI after PPCI was performed based on guidelines and the same in both groups. All patients were evaluated 1, 2, and 3 months after the start of treatment in terms of predicted outcomes. Results The occurrence of 3-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the case and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference (28.6% versus 35.0%; P value: 0.286). Also, investigations showed that the rate of re-infarction (P value: 0.024) and target lesion revascularization (P value: 0.003) was significantly lower in the group that received Eptifibatide infusion. Conclusions Eptifibatide maintenance dose infusion in patients who undergo PPCI in the context of STEMI, does not significantly reduce MACE, although it does significantly reduce re-infarction and target lesion revascularization. It also does not increase the risk of bleeding and cerebrovascular events.

Background: Intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) is a result of ischemia-reperfusion injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Despite patients with IMH show poorer prognoses, studies investigating predictors of IMH occurrence are scarce. This study firstly investigated the effectiveness of regulatory T cell (Treg), peak value of Creatine Kinase MB (pCKMB), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) as predictors for IMH. Methods: In 182 STEMI patients received PPCI, predictors of IMH were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. The predictive ability of risk factors for IMH were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and C-index. Results: Overall, 80 patients (44.0%) developed IMH. All 4 biomarkers were independent predictors of IMH [odds ratio [OR] (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.350 (0.202-0.606) for Treg, 1.004 (1.001-1.006) for pCKMB, 1.060 (1.022-1.100) for hsCRP, and 3.329 (1.346-8.236) for LVESD]. After propensity score matching (PSM), the biomarkers significantly predicted IMH with areas under the curve of 0.750 for Treg, 0.721 for pCKMB, 0.656 for hsCRP, 0.633 for LVESD, and 0.821 for the integrated 4-marker panel. The addition of integrated 4-marker panel to a baseline risk model had an incremental effect on the predictive value for IMH [NRI: 0.197 (0.039 to 0.356); IDI: 0.200 (0.142 to 0.259); C-index: 0.806 (0.744 to 0.869), all p < 0.05]. Conclusions: Treg individually or in combination with pCKMB, hsCRP, and LVESD can effectively predict the existence of IMH in STEMI patients received PPCI. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03939338. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To study the effect of intracoronary injection of adenosine for the prevention of noreflow phenomenon (NRP) before balloon dilation and stent placement during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods　A prospective randomized controlled design was used to select 196 NSTEMI patients who received PPCI in the Department of Cardiology, Yan’an Hospital, from January 2020 to June 2022. Randomized number table method was used to divide the patients into two groups, with 98 patients in each group. Patients in one group were treated with intracoronary injection of 100 µg adenosine prophylactically before stent placement or balloon dilation；while patents in another group were given 100 ug adenosine after stent placement if NRP happened. At the end of PPCI, the incidence of myocardial infarction thrombolysis test (TIMI) blood grading, myocardial TIMI perfusion grading (TMPG), myocardial staining grading (MBG) and NRP were examined. Results　After stent placement, 89.6% of patients in the prophylactic administration group had blood flow TIMI, TMPG and MBG grades of infarct-related vessels reaching grade 3, and 73.4% in the remedial administration group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The incidence of NRP was 8.2% in the prophylactic group and the incidence was 23.6% in the remedial administration group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). TIMI, TMPG and MBG grade 3 blood flow were restored in all patients presented with NRP after intracoronary injection of adenosine. Conclusion　For indicated patients with NSTEMI, prophylactical intracoronary injection of adenosine before stent implantation can reduce the incidence of NRP significantly after stent placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is usually caused by a rupture in the atherosclerotic plaque, followed by platelet aggregation which ultimately leads to acute coronary artery occlusion. So far, few studies have investigated the effect of maintenance dose of Eptifibatide (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) in STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effect of maintenance dose of Eptifibatide in patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI. 264 patients who had acute chest pain suggestive of STEMI were entered in the study. All patients received the same dose of bolus dose of Eptifibatide in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Then the patients were randomly divided into two groups, one group (n = 147) received a maintenance dose of intravenous Eptifibatide (infusion of 2 μg/kg/min) and the other group (n = 117) did not receive this treatment. Standard medical treatment of STEMI after PPCI was performed based on guidelines and the same in both groups. All patients were evaluated 1, 2, and 3 months after the start of treatment in terms of predicted outcomes. Results: The occurrence of 3-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the case and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference (28.6% versus 35.0%; P value: 0.286). Also, investigations showed that the rate of re-infarction (P value: 0.024) and target lesion revascularization (P value: 0.003) was significantly lower in the group that received Eptifibatide infusion. Conclusions: Eptifibatide maintenance dose infusion in patients who undergo PPCI in the context of STEMI, does not significantly reduce MACE, although it does significantly reduce re-infarction and target lesion revascularization. It also does not increase the risk of bleeding and cerebrovascular events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to assess the ability and the safety of fasting among patients who underwent PPCI within two specified periods. Methods: This study was a Retrospective Cohort Study with a convenience sample size of 200 consecutive patients who were divided into two groups based on the duration of their last primary PCI for an attack of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the start of the month of Ramadan. The patients were admitted to the Causality Department of the Surgical Specialty Hospital-Cardiac Center, Erbil/Iraq. Group I included patients undergone PPCI 6 weeks or less before the start of Ramadan while group II included patients undergone PPCI for more than 6 weeks before the start of the fasting month of Ramadan. Furthermore, each of these two groups was subdivided based on their ability to complete the Ramadan Intermittent Fasting (RIF) with no recurring or worsening of symptoms into those who fasted the whole Ramadan month, those who did not fast, those who could not continue fasting, and those who passed away. At the end of the RIF, patients' symptoms were recorded along with their status according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA). Results: In a comparison of the proportion of fasting and non-fasting patients among the two groups, 14% in group I were able to complete the 30 days of intermittent fasting during the Ramadan month while this percentage in group II was 54% (P-value = 0.001). Among our findings, there were significant associations between post-PCI symptoms (exertional shortness of breath and palpitations) and RIF (P-values = 0.001 and P-values = 0.004, respectively). With regards to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications assessment, Group I had a higher proportion of patients classified as Class III and Class IV compared to Group II (P-value = 0.001) meaning patients were more symptomatic during the lesser interval between the start of the fasting month and the primary PCI. Conclusion: Patients with PPCI within the first 6 weeks after the procedure, as well as patients with NYHA class III, are at a higher risk for health deterioration and are advised not to observe RIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a performance metric by which primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) services are assessed. Consecutive patients presenting with STEMI undergoing PPCI between January 2007 to December 2019 from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry were included. Patients were stratified based on DTBT (≤60 min, 61-90 min, 91-180 min) and Killip status (I-III vs. IV). Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30-days and 1-year. In total, 13,823 patients were included, with 82.59% achieving DTBT ≤90 min and 49.77% achieving DTBT ≤60 min. For Killip I-III (n = 11,591,83.85%), the median DTBT was 60[46–78]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 1.08%, 2.17% and 4.33% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, however, there was no significant difference for 30-day and 1-year outcomes across all DTBT (p > 0.05). For Killip IV, the median DTBT was 68[51–91]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 11.74%, 20.48% and 35.06% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for 30-day and 1-year outcomes, DTBT 91-180 min was an independent predictor of worse outcomes (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between DTBT of ≤60 min and 61-90 min (p > 0.05). In Killip I-III patients, DTBT had no significant impact on outcomes upon adjustment for confounders. Conversely, for Killip IV patients, a DTBT of >90 min was associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes, with no differences between a DTBT of ≤60 min vs. 61-90 min. Outcomes in STEMI involve a complex interplay of factors and recommendations of a lowered DTBT of ≤60 min will require further evaluation. • For Killip I-III patients, longer DTBT times were not independent predictors of 30-day or 1-year mortality/MACE. • In Killip IV patients, a longer DTBT of >90 min portends poorer 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes, with no significant difference between a DTBT of ≤60 min vs. <90 min. • While the minority, there was still a proportion (>15%) of patients who had DTBT >90 min in our cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are formed by DNA, histones and proteolytic enzymes, and are produced by activated neutrophils through different mechanisms. In turn, NETs can activate platelets and coagulation cascade favoring thrombotic processes. The aims of this study were to analyze levels and kinetics of NETs in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and correlate them with antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes at follow-up. 150 consecutive STEMI patients referred to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were included. Citrate anticoagulated blood was extracted immediately before pPCI, 30 min and 24 h after the procedure. As markers of NETS cell free DNA (cfDNA), nucleosomes and citrullinated Histone 3 (citH3) were determined. 46 healthy subjects were included as controls. Patients were follow-up for 1.4 ± 0.56 years. Before pPCI, NETs markers were elevated in STEMI patients compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05); these increased significantly 30 min post pPCI (p ≤ 0.001) and decreased at 24 h but remained elevated compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Patients treated with bivalirudin presented a lower increase of NETs 30 min post pPCI compared to patients treated with heparin (p < 0.05). Cardiovascular risk factors or type of stent implanted did not modify NETs levels. Cit3H (HR = 3.74; 95%CI 1.05–13.4; p = 0.042) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (HR = 6.84; 95%CI 2–23; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and/or cardiovascular-cause death. NETs were elevated in STEMI patients, increased by pPCI and decreased thereafter. One of the most specific NETs markers was associated with cardiovascular outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundPharmaco-invasive therapy (PIT), combining thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention, was a potential complement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), while bleeding risk was still a concern.ObjectivesThis study aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of PIT and pPCI.MethodsA systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were conducted on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus. RCTs and observational studies were all collected and respectively analyzed, and combined pooled analysis was also presented. The primary efficacy outcome was short-term all-cause mortality within 30 days, including in-hospital period. The primary safety outcome was 30-day trial-defined major bleeding events.ResultsA total of 26,597 patients from 5 RCTs and 12 observational studies were included. There was no significant difference in short-term mortality [RCTs: risk ratio (RR): 1.14, 95% CI: 0.67–1.93, I2 = 0%, p = 0.64; combined results: odds ratio (OR): 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93–1.29, I2 = 0%, p = 0.30] and 30-day major bleeding events (RCTs: RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.07–2.93, I2 = 0%, p = 0.39; combined results: OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.53–1.92, I2 = 0%, p = 0.98). However, pPCI reduced risk of in-hospital major bleeding events, stroke and intracranial bleeding, but increased risk of in-hospital heart failure and 30-day heart failure in combined analysis of RCTs and observational studies, despite no significant difference in analysis of RCTs.ConclusionPharmaco-invasive therapy could be an important complement for pPCI in real-world clinical practice under specific conditions, but studies aiming at optimizing thrombolysis and its combination of mandatory coronary angiography are also warranted.

Abstract Background We determined whether it is feasible to identify important changes in care management resulting from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway from hospital episode data, in order to construct a composite primary outcome (hypothesised to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac-related events, MACE) to compare patients exposed to CMR or not. Methods We used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) to identify clinical events that reflected important changes in management in the year following the index admission in five subgroups of patients who activated the PPCI pathway recruited as part of a feasibility cohort study (n = 1655 with HES/PEDW data). For all subgroups, we identified frequency of events and time to the first event for each change in management. Results We identified all clinical events (new diagnoses, additional diagnostic tests and procedures) except for medication prescriptions. Diagnostic tests were underestimated because most are carried out in outpatient clinics and outpatient datasets had missing procedure codes for 74% of patients (some tests done in hospital may also not be recorded). We successfully tabulated frequencies of events and distributions of times to first event for most changes in management by CMR status and in CMR / non CMR centres. Conclusions It is feasible to identify changes in care management between patients who have / do not have CMR within relevant patient subgroups. Further work to derive a weighting algorithm is required before attempting to combine the events in a composite endpoint.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide; approximately 80% of CVD deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The epidemiologic transition to a high burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD) has happened with greater rapidity in LMICs than in high-income countries. The absolute number of individuals with premature IHD has increased substantially. Higher event rates are observed compared with high-income countries. The technological capability to do extraordinary things for patients has increased, as has patient demand, in a setting of constrained resources and expensive health care of variable quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: No-reflow (NRF) phenomenon is a significant challenge in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Accurate prediction of NRF may help improve clinical outcomes of patients. This retrospective study aimed at creating an optimal model based on machine learning (ML) to predict NRF in these patients, with the additional objective of guiding pre- and intra-operative decision-making to reduce NRF incidence., Methods: Data were collected from 321 STEMI patients undergoing pPCI between January 2022 and May 2023, with the dataset being randomly divided into training and internal validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Selected features included pre- and intra-operative demographic data, laboratory parameters, electrocardiogram, comorbidities, patients' clinical status, coronary angiographic data, and intraoperative interventions. Post comprehensive feature cleaning and engineering, three logistic regression (LR) models [LR-classic, LR-random forest (LR-RF), and LR-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (LR-XGB)], a RF model and an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model were developed within the training set, followed by performance evaluation on the internal validation sets., Results: Among the 261 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 212 were allocated to the normal flow group and 49 to the NRF group. The training group consisted of 183 patients, while the internal validation group included 78 patients. The LR-XGB model, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.779-0.880], was selected as the representative model for logistic regression analyses. The LR model had an AUC slightly lower than XGBoost model (AUC 0.835, 95% CI: 0.781-0.889) but significantly higher than RF model (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.660-0.802). Internal validation underscored the unique advantages of each model, with the LR model demonstrating the highest clinical net benefit at relevant thresholds, as determined by decision curve analysis. The LR model encompassed seven meaningful features, and notably, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow after initial balloon dilation (TFAID) was the most impactful predictor in all models. A web-based application based on the LR model, hosting these predictive models, is available at https://l7173o-wang-lyn.shinyapps.io/shiny-1/., Conclusions: A LR model was successfully developed through ML to forecast NRF phenomena in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. A web-based application derived from the LR model facilitates clinical implementation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-83/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) especially those with large MI (myocardial infarction) as identified by ST elevation in multiple contiguous ECG leads or anterior MI, may suffer significant myocardial damage leading to impaired wall motion and contractility which may lead to the formation of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in the patient. This study was aimed to establish the incidence of LV thrombus and determine the predictors associated with the formation of LV thrombus in patients with AMI. Methods: This retrospective study was held at the only cardiothoracic centre of Makkah, which provides tertiary level cardiac services. A total of 3084 consecutive patients with acute MI between 2016 and 2019 were identified and divided into two groups i.e. group I (with LVT) and group II (without LVT). The case notes, echocardiography data and cardiac catheterization lab records were reviewed to identify patients with LV thrombus. Regression analysis was employed to evaluate the predictors responsible for the formation of LV thrombus. Results: The overall incidence for LV thrombus was determined as 8.4% (n =260/3084), while in the subpopulation of pilgrims, it was 8.2% (83/1001). Mean age for patients with and without LVT was 54 ± 11 years vs 56 ± 12 years (p < 0.003), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, Arabic speaking or BMI>30. Coronary thrombus aspiration was utilized in 17% vs 12% (p < 0.023) patients with LVT and without LVT, respectively. It was observed that the patients with cardiac arrest tend to develop more LVT i.e. 8.5% vs 5.2% (p < 0.033). However, LV thrombus formation was significantly associated with anterior STEMI with incidence of LVT reaching 13.4% and low ejection fraction (all MI types) i-e. 32 ± 9% vs 42 ± 11%, with p < 0.000 for both independent predictors. Conclusions: LV thrombus is a relatively common occurrence in patients with acute MI, especially those with anterior STEMI and low ejection fraction<30%. Appropriate imaging studies are required for all acute MI patients in order to ascertain the presence or absence of LV thrombus as it has major influence on further management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway to assess heart function. It is uncertain whether having CMR influences patient management or the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in these patients. Objective: To determine whether or not it is feasible to set up a national registry, linking routinely collected data from hospital information systems (HISs), to investigate the role of CMR in patients who activate the PPCI pathway. Design: A feasibility prospective cohort study. Setting: Four 24/7 PPCI hospitals in England and Wales (two with and two without a dedicated CMR facility). Participants: Patients who activated the PPCI pathway and underwent an emergency coronary angiogram. Interventions: CMR either performed or not performed within 10 weeks of the index event. Main outcome measures: A. Feasibility parameters – (1) patient consent implemented at all hospitals, (2) data extracted from more than one HIS and successfully linked for > 90% of consented patients at all four hospitals, (3) HIS data successfully linked with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Patient Episode Database Wales (PEDW) for > 90% of consented patients at all four hospitals and (4) CMR requested and carried out for ≥ 10% of patients activating the PPCI pathway in CMR hospitals. B. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness for CMR (identified from simple cost-effectiveness models) in patients with (1) multivessel disease and (2) unobstructed coronary arteries. C. A change in clinical management arising from having CMR (defined using formal consensus and identified using HES follow-up data in the 12 months after the index event). Results: A. (1) Consent was implemented (for all hospitals, consent rates were 59–74%) and 1670 participants were recruited. (2) Data submission was variable – clinical data available for ≥ 82% of patients across all hospitals, biochemistry and echocardiography (ECHO) data available for ≥ 98%, 34% and 87% of patients in three hospitals and medications data available for 97% of patients in one hospital. (3) HIS data were linked with hospital episode data for 99% of all consented patients. (4) At the two CMR hospitals, 14% and 20% of patients received CMR. B. In both (1) multivessel disease and (2) unobstructed coronary arteries, the difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between CMR and no CMR [‘current’ comparator, stress ECHO and standard ECHO, respectively] was very small [0.0012, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.0076 to 0.0093 and 0.0005, 95% CI –0.0050 to 0.0077, respectively]. The diagnostic accuracy of the ischaemia tests was the key driver of cost-effectiveness in sensitivity analyses for both patient subgroups. C. There was consensus that CMR leads to clinically important changes in management in five patient subgroups. Some changes in management were successfully identified in hospital episode data (e.g. new diagnoses/procedures, frequency of outpatient episodes related to cardiac events), others were not (e.g. changes in medications, new diagnostic tests). Conclusions: A national registry is not currently feasible. Patients were consented successfully but conventional consent could not be implemented nationally. Linking HIS and hospital episode data was feasible but HIS data were not uniformly available. It is feasible to identify some, but not all, changes in management in the five patient subgroups using hospital episode data. The delay in obtaining hospital episode data influenced the relevance of some of our study objectives. Future work: To test the feasibility of conducting the study using national data sets (e.g. HES, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society audit database, Diagnostic Imaging Dataset, Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Funding: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme. This study was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, a UK Clinical Research Collaboration-registered clinical trials unit that, as part of the Bristol Trials Centre, is in receipt of NIHR clinical trials unit support funding.

Objective To investigate the timing of the application of nicoradil for preventing and controlling the phenomenon of no reflow during the Primary percutaneous coronary intervention process in ACS patients. Method Depending on the time of application of nicodil， 168 patients with ACS with routine PPCI were selected， they were divided into 2 groups according to the random number table method， there were 84 cases in each group， all were given intravascularly， one group received prophylactic administration before stent placement， the other group was the salvage administration group with no refiow after stent implantation; after stent implantation， the TIMI， TMPG and MBG grades of blood flow and the incidence of no reflow were observed and compared. Results After stent implantation， the proportion of patients with grade 3 blood flow grade TIMI， TMPG and MBG in Culprit vessel， the prophylactic group was 91.7%，the remedial administration group was 76.2%，there were statistical differences (P<0.05)；no reflow of blood vessels in Culprit vessel， the prophylactic group was 8.3%， the remedial administration group was 23.8%， there were statistical differences(P<0.05)；all patients presented with no reflow， after intravascular treatment with nicodil， TIMI， TMPG and MBG grade 3 blood flow was restored. Conclusion For appropriate ACS patients， when the line PPCI， treatment with nicodil was given before stent implantation， it can significantly reduce the incidence of no reflow after stent implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims - The objective of our study is to compare pharmaco-invasive strategy (PhIS) in terms of safety and efficacy, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) strategy as standard therapy for STEMI patients from remote areas. Background - At present, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients. However, despite pPCI being the gold standard, it is not always achievable due to variables such as lack of cardiac catheterization services and delays in the first medical contact-to-balloon time. Methods - This observational study is based on a prospective analysis of a cohort of 157 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, over nine months, at Elias University Hospital (EUH). The study assessed the safety and efficacy of a sequence of fibrinolytic therapy in the first contact hospital before being referred to our center for PCI (PhIS, 35 patients, 22.29%) versus angioplasty alone (pPCI, 122 patients, 77.70%) during hospitalization. The primary outcomes studied were in-hospital death, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), while secondary outcomes were the length of in-hospital stay, and the safety of the procedure. Results - The median reperfusion time was lower for the PhIS group compared to the primary PCI group (4 hours, IQR:6.25 vs 7 hours, IQR:12.38, p<0.05). The left ventricular systolic function (%) on arrival at EUH was higher in the PhIS group compared with the PCI alone group (46.55; 95%CI 42.42-49.15 vs 41.73; 95%CI 39.91-43.34; p=0.04). The mean number of diseased vessels, including the culprit-lesion, were similar in the two groups (2.84 vs 2.82, p=0.09). The in-hospital mortality rate was lower in the PhIS group than in the primary PCI group (1 patient; 2.9% vs 18 patients; 14.80%; p=0.05), while the number of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was not significantly different (17.10% vs 26.20%; p=0.27). There was no difference of the median length of hospitalization (6 days, IQR:2 vs 5 days, IQR:3; p=0.67) for the PhIS, and primary PCI groups, respectively. The safety endpoints of the procedures were similar in the two groups. Conclusions - Pharmaco-invasive strategy (PhIS) had clinical and procedural outcomes (in-hospital MACE, length of in-hospital stay) similar to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), in case of long distances to catheterization laboratories. Efficient thrombolysis makes PhIS a viable alternative in saving lives with a lower rate of in-hospital death than pPCI. Performed thrombolysis in a local non-PCI center and referral of the STEMI patients to a 24/7 catheterization laboratory may be a good option for areas where the infrastructure of such facilities is weak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been widely recognized as the preferred treatment for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, substantial numbers of STEMI patients cannot receive timely PPCI. Early fibrinolysis followed by routine percutaneous coronary intervention (FPCI) has been proposed as an effective and safe alternative for eligible patients. To date, few studies have compared FPCI with PPCI in terms of microvascular reperfusion. This study aimed to evaluate the microvascular function of FPCI and PPCI., Methods: STEMI patients at the Peking University First Hospital and Miyun Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2015 to December 2020. Microvascular function documented by the coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (caIMR) was measured at the final angiogram after revascularization. The primary end point was the caIMR of the culprit vessels. The secondary end points were in-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-fatal stroke/transient ischemic attacks (TIA). Details of the adverse clinical events were obtained from telephone interviews and electronic medical record systems until January 2022., Results: In total, 496 STEMI patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional retrospective study. Of these patients, 81 underwent FPCI, and 415 underwent PPCI. At the baseline, the PPCI patients had a higher-risk profile than the FPCI patients. The time from symptom onset to reperfusion therapy was significantly shorter in the FPCI group than the PPCI group (median 3.0 vs. 4.5 hours; P<0.001). The caIMR was significantly lower in the FPCI group than the PPCI group (median 20.34 vs. 40.33; P<0.001). The median follow-up duration was 4.1 years. During the follow-up period, the rate of MACE was lower in the FPCI group than the PPCI group [7 (10.1%) vs. 82 (20.8%), P=0.048]. After propensity score matching to adjust for the imbalances at the baseline, the caIMR remained significant and the clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups., Conclusions: In eligible STEMI patients, clinically successful FPCI may be associated with better microvascular reperfusion and comparable clinical outcomes as compared with PPCI., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-23-666/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.)

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2012) recommends that patients with ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should be monitored in a coronary care unit (CCU) for a minimum of 24 hours post primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, in practice, stable patients with complication-free PPCI are often stepped down earlier than the recommended 24 hours as a result of the increased demand on CCU beds. The aim of this audit was to establish optimum CCU monitoring time and the complication rate in this patient group within the 48 hours of PPCI. The audit shows that 37% of patients were stepped down from CCU earlier than the recommended period. All complications observed were minor and more than 50% of these occurred within the first 6 hours. The results demonstrated that a minimum of 24 hours of CCU monitoring is not mandatory and the length of CCU monitoring can be decided upon on an individual patient basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has an incidence of around 1 in 1000 of the UK population. Since 2008, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been considered the gold standard management, and the mortality benefits of this approach versus the previous standard treatment of thrombolysis are well documented. There is less evidence around the quality of life outcomes of patients who undergo PPCI for STEMI, despite the fact that even after a successful procedure, they may be left with impaired heart function (heart failure). This article sets out to explore the issues related to morbidity and quality of life post PPCI, and what, if anything, could be done to improve these outcomes for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) targets early intervention, achieving better outcomes for patients suffering from an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with fewer complications. Despite this progress in the treatment of this condition, the nursing care of patients post procedure appears to have changed little and appears to have evolved based on perceptions of what might be required rather than evidence for what is effective. This article presents the findings of a national benchmarking exercise and review of the literature that identified a lack of standards for nursing care in this patient group with recommendations for developing evidence to inform future practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accounts for 1 in 5 male and 1 in 8 female deaths in the UK. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A network of PPCI centres across the UK provides a safe and effective treatment for patients and prompt diagnosis and transfer to a PPCI cardiac catheter laboratory provider is the key to a successful outcome. Access is more commonly via the radial artery, rather than the femoral artery, since this reduces access site complications. Complications are rare (less than 1%), but serious, and require a skilled multidisciplinary team approach for optimal management. Hospitalisation is for 2-3 days in uncomplicated cases, with secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation being offered to all AMI patients. The introduction of PPCI for STEMI across the UK has reduced patient mortality and improved outcomes in comparison with fibrinolysis, which was the previous standard. This article provides a review of PPCI for the treatment of STEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Prolonged total ischaemic time (TIT) has been shown to independently predict poor myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients and affect in-hospital mortality. We aim to evaluate the influence of TIT on long-term follow-up (F/U) and identify the factors associated with TIT in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI at a high volume centre. Methods In a prospective "all-comer" registry, clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics, TIT and 9-year mortality were determined in consecutive STEMI patients treated with pPCI. Patients were divided according to TIT into three groups: A) < 3, B) 3-6 and C) > 6 h. Results Among 1064 patients, TIT was known in 1002 patients, 5 patients were lost to F/U. For censored observations F/U was 7.2-8.8 years. There were 350, 461, and 186 patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Patients in group A compared to B and C were younger, more often males and smokers, less frequently had history of CAD, and more frequently had occluded infarct related artery. However, final TIMI3 was obtained more frequently. Overall 30-day mortality was 4%, one-year mortality 7% and nine-year mortality 27%. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that longer TIT was associated with a higher risk of 9-year mortality (A-21%, B-28%, C-37%, p < 0.0005). TIT > 6 h was independently associated with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, history of CAD and higher rate of initial TIMI grade flow 3. Conclusions TIT is strongly related with mortality in STEMI patients even after nine years of F/U. This finding reinforces the necessity of shortening the TIT in all STEMI patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The goal of this trial was to study the long-term effects of intravenous (IV) metoprolol administration before reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical events. Background: Early IV metoprolol during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: The METOCARD-CNIC (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial recruited 270 patients with Killip class ≤II anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset (<6 h) and randomized them to pre-reperfusion IV metoprolol or control group. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 202 patients (101 per group) 6 months after STEMI. Patients had a minimal 12-month clinical follow-up. Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the 6 months MRI was higher after IV metoprolol (48.7 ± 9.9% vs. 45.0 ± 11.7% in control subjects; adjusted treatment effect 3.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44% to 6.55%; p = 0.025). The occurrence of severely depressed LVEF (≤35%) at 6 months was significantly lower in patients treated with IV metoprolol (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). The proportion of patients fulfilling Class I indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (7% vs. 20%, p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 2 years, occurrence of the pre-specified composite of death, heart failure admission, reinfarction, and malignant arrhythmias was 10.8% in the IV metoprolol group versus 18.3% in the control group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.04; p = 0.065. Heart failure admission was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.95; p = 0.046). Conclusions: In patients with anterior Killip class ≤II STEMI undergoing pPCI, early IV metoprolol before reperfusion resulted in higher long-term LVEF, reduced incidence of severe LV systolic dysfunction and ICD indications, and fewer heart failure admissions. (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The METOCARD-CNIC Trial; NCT01311700) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of access site bleeding (ASB) and non-ASB for recurrent ischemic outcomes and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background: The prognostic value of ASB-related complications after STEMI is subject to debate. Methods: The prognostic value of ASB and non-ASB for 1-year mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and stroke was investigated in 2,002 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of studies investigating the prognostic value of ASB and non-ASB in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Results: Seventy-four patients (3.7%) were treated by radial access. ASB developed in 124 patients (6.3%) and non-ASB developed in 102 (5.2%). By multivariable analysis, ASB was not associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; p = 0.89), recurrent MI (HR: 1.16; p = 0.64), stent thrombosis (HR: 0.55; p = 0.42), or stroke (HR: 0.47; p = 0.31). Non-ASB was independently associated with 1-year mortality (HR: 2.77; p < 0.001) and stent thrombosis (HR: 3.10; p = 0.021), but not with recurrent MI and stroke. In a meta-analysis including 495,630 patients, non-ASB was associated with a greater adjusted risk of subsequent 1-year mortality than ASB (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.56 to 1.76 and HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.31). Conclusions: In STEMI, ASB was not significantly associated with 1-year clinical outcomes, whereas non-ASB was significantly associated with 1-year mortality and stent thrombosis. These results taken together with those of previous studies indicate a greater risk of subsequent mortality in patients with non-ASB. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of the present analysis was to compare 1-year mortality prediction of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding complications with existing bleeding definitions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to investigate the prognostic value of the individual data elements of the bleeding classifications for 1-year mortality. Background: BARC recently proposed a novel standardized bleeding definition. Methods: The in-hospital occurrence of bleeding defined according to the BARC, TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction), GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries), and ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) bleeding classifications was assessed in 2,002 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention between January 1, 2003, and July 31, 2008. Results: BARC types 2, 3, 4, and 5 bleeding occurred in 4.4%, 14.2%, 1.4%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. By multivariable analysis, GUSTO- and ISTH-defined bleeding was not significantly associated with 1-year mortality, whereas TIMI major and BARC type 3b or 3c bleeding conferred a 2-fold higher risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratios [HRs]: 2.00 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32 to 3.01] and 1.84 [95% CI: 1.23 to 2.77], respectively). Data elements most strongly associated with mortality were a hemoglobin decrease ≥5 g/dl (HR: 1.94 [95% CI: 1.26 to 2.98]), the use of vasoactive agents for bleeding (HR: 2.01 [95% CI: 0.91 to 4.44]), cardiac tamponade (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 0.56 to 10.1]), and intracranial hemorrhage (HRs for 1-year mortality were not computable because there was only 1 patient with intracranial bleeding). Conclusions: Both the BARC and TIMI bleeding classification identified STEMI patients at risk of 1-year mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare baseline characteristics and medium-term prognosis in South Asian and Caucasian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: It is unclear whether South Asians undergoing PCI have worse outcomes than Caucasians. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 279,256 patients undergoing PCI from 2004 to 2011 from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society national database, of whom 259,318 (92.9%) were Caucasian and 19,938 (7.1%) were South Asian (South Asian includes patients of Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, or Sri Lankan ethnic origin). The main outcome measures were in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality during a median follow-up of 2.8 years (interquartile range: 1.5 to 4.5 years). Results: South Asians were younger (59.69 ± 0.27 years vs. 64.69 ± 0.13 years, p > 0.0001); more burdened by cardiovascular risk factors, particularly diabetes mellitus (42.1 ± 1.2% vs. 15.4 ± 0.4%, p > 0.0001); and more likely to have multivessel coronary disease than Caucasians. In-hospital rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar for South Asians and Caucasians (3.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.40). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause mortality showed better survival for South Asians compared with Caucasians, after PCI for either acute myocardial infarction or angina. Age-adjusted analysis revealed increased mortality (hazard ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.30), but after adjustment for the substantial variation in baseline risk factors including diabetes, there was no significant difference between South Asians and Caucasians (hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.94 to 1.05). Conclusions: In this large, contemporary cohort of patients treated by PCI, South Asians were younger but had more extensive disease and major risk factors, particularly diabetes. However, after correcting for these differences, in-hospital and medium-term mortality of South Asians was no worse than that of Caucasians. This suggests that in South Asians, the high prevalence of diabetes exerts an adverse influence on mortality, but ethnicity itself is not an independent predictor of outcome. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Guidelines report that the optimal treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) when performed timely by trained operators. Yet, the reopening of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is not always followed by myocardial reperfusion. This phenomenon is most commonly called “no-reflow”, is caused by microvascular obstruction (MVO) and is associated to a worse outcome. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is crucial for the diagnosis of STEMI, but is also useful for the assessment of MVO. In this review we summarize ECG-derived parameters associated to MVO and their prognostic relevance. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate whether remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIPC) could reduce enzymatic infarct size in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Background: Myocardial reperfusion injury may attenuate the benefit of pPCI. In animal models, RIPC mitigates myocardial reperfusion injury. Methods: One hundred patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and occluded left anterior descending artery were randomized to pPCI + RIPC (n = 50) or conventional pPCI (n = 50). RIPC consisted of 3 cycles of 5 min/5 min ischemia/reperfusion by cuff inflation/deflation of the lower limb. The primary endpoint was infarct size assessed by the area under the curve of creatinine kinase-myocardial band release (CK-MB). Secondary endpoints included the following: infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance delayed enhancement volume; T2-weighted edema volume; ST-segment resolution >50%; TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count; and myocardial blush grading. Results: Four patients (2 RIPC, 2 controls) were excluded due to missing samples of CK-MB. A total of 96 patients were analyzed; median area under the curve CK-MB was 8,814 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5,567 to 11,325) arbitrary units in the RIPC group and 10,065 (IQR: 7,465 to 14,004) arbitrary units in control subjects (relative reduction: 20%, 95% confidence interval: 0.2% to 28.7%; p = 0.043). Seventy-seven patients underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance scan 3 to 5 days after randomization, and 66 patients repeated a second scan after 4 months. T2-weighted edema volume was 37 ± 16 cc in RIPC patients and 47 ± 22 cc in control subjects (p = 0.049). ST-segment resolution >50% was 66% in RIPC and 37% in control subjects (p = 0.015). We observed no significant differences in TIMI frame count, myocardial blush grading, and delayed enhancement volume. Conclusions: In patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, RIPC at the time of pPCI reduced enzymatic infarct size and was also associated with an improvement of T2-weighted edema volume and ST-segment resolution >50%. (Remote Postconditioning in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [RemPostCon]; NCT00865722) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the relationship between the degree of microvascular dysfunction assessed by a dual-sensor guidewire (pressure and Doppler velocity) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for a first anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background: Microvascular dysfunction after AMI is associated with progressive LV dilation. Methods: In 24 consecutive patients, the microvascular resistance index (MVRI) immediately after PPCI was calculated as the ratio of the mean distal pressure to average peak flow velocity during maximal hyperemia. Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed to determine LV volumes at baseline and 8-month follow-up. LV remodeling was defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of ≥20%. Results: In patients with an MVRI greater than the median value of 2.96 mm Hg·cm−1·s, the LVEDV increased significantly from 117.1 ± 20.7 ml at baseline to 146.5 ± 21.4 ml (p = 0.006) at 8 months, whereas it did not change between baseline and 8 months (108.2 ± 21.2 ml vs. 111.6 ± 29.9 ml, p = 0.620) in patients with an MVRI ≤2.96 mm Hg·cm−1·s. LV remodeling was more frequent in the group with an MVRI >2.96 mm Hg·cm−1·s (64% vs. 15%, p = 0.033). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between MVRI and the percentage of increase or decrease in LVEDV (r = 0.42, p = 0.042). Logistic regression analysis showed that MVRI was the strongest univariate predictor of LV remodeling. The best cutoff value of MVRI was 2.96 mm Hg·cm−1·s with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 73%. Conclusions: MVRI immediately after PPCI predicts LV remodeling in patients with reperfused anterior AMI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the influence of access site utilization on mortality, major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE), bleeding, and vascular complications in a large number of patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in the United Kingdom over a 5-year period, through analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database. Background: Despite advances in antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy, bleeding complications remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. A significant proportion of such bleeding complications are related to the access site, and adoption of radial access may reduce these complications. These benefits have not previously been studied in a large unselected national population of PPCI patients. Methods: Mortality (30-day), MACCE (a composite of 30-day mortality and in-hospital myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular events), and bleeding and access site complications were studied based on transfemoral access (TFA) and transradial access (TRA) site utilization in PPCI STEMI patients. The influence of access site selection was studied in 46,128 PPCI patients; TFA was used in 28,091 patients and TRA in 18,037. Data were adjusted for potential confounders using Cox regression that accounted for the propensity to undergo radial or femoral approach. Results: TRA was independently associated with a lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.97; p < 0.05), in-hospital MACCE (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93; p < 0.05), major bleeding (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.74; p < 0.01), and access site complications (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.75; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis of a large number of PPCI procedures demonstrates that utilization of TRA is independently associated with major reductions in mortality, MACCE, major bleeding, and vascular complication rates. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study sought to assess whether intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside following thrombus aspiration (TA) is superior to TA alone for the prevention of microvascular obstruction (MVO) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: MVO, due to its multifactorial pathogenesis, still occurs after TA in a sizeable portion of patients. Methods: We performed a placebo-controlled, randomized, open-label, blind-examination, multicenter trial. A total of 240 STEMI patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to receive adenosine (n = 80), nitroprusside (n = 80), or saline (n = 80) given distal to the occluded site after TA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ST-segment resolution (STR) >70% on surface electrocardiogram at 90 min after PCI. Secondary endpoints were angiographic MVO incidence (TIMI flow grade ≤2 or 3 with a myocardial blush grade <2) and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate at 30 days as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and heart failure requiring hospitalization. Results: STR >70% occurred in in 71% of adenosine-treated patients, in 54% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 51% of saline-treated patients (p = 0.009 and p = 0.75, respectively, vs. saline). Angiographic MVO occurred in 18% of adenosine-treated patients, in 24% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 30% of saline-treated patients (p = 0.06 and p = 0.37, respectively, vs. saline). MACE occurred in 10%, 14%, and 20% of patients, respectively (p = 0.08 and p = 0.29 vs. saline). Conclusions: In STEMI patients treated by PCI and TA, the additional intracoronary administration of adenosine, but not that of nitroprusside, results in a significant improvement of MVO, as assessed by STR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Primary angioplasty is becoming an established treatment for myocardial infarction. Yet we have a limited understanding of patients'' attitudes toward this treatment and their experiences of receiving it in practice. Aims: Exploration of patients'' experiences and perceptions of primary angioplasty as treatment for their heart attack. Methods: Qualitative study of a purposive sample of patients admitted to a tertiary cardiology unit in east London, UK. Participants were interviewed either in their own homes or in hospital. Recruitment continued until no new substantial themes emerged. Eleven men and four women aged 35 to 74 years who had sustained a myocardial infarction were interviewed 13 to 90 days after primary angioplasty. We used the framework method of analysis to identify and explore emerging themes. Results: Informants were expecting open-heart surgery as treatment for their heart attack. They were impressed by the service they actually received. They were generally not engaged in decisions about their treatment in the acute setting and this passivity sometimes persisted after discharge. Expectations of follow up in primary care were not often met. Conclusions: Patients are satisfied with the primary angioplasty as treatment for acute myocardial infarction but have poor understanding of the management of this condition. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The no-reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is a predictor of unfavorable prognosis. Patients with no-reflow have many complications during admission, and it is considered a marker of short-term mortality. The current research emphasizes the circumstances of the incidence and complications of the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients, including in-hospital mortality. In this case-control study, conducted over two and a half years, there were enrolled 656 patients diagnosed with STEMI and reperfused through PPCI. Several patients (n = 96) developed an interventional type of no-reflow phenomenon. One third of the patients with a no-reflow phenomenon suffered complications during admission, and 14 succumbed. Regarding complications, the majority consisted of arrhythmias (21.68%) and cardiogenic shock (16.67%). The anterior localization of STEMI and the left anterior descending artery (LAD) as a culprit lesion were associated with the highest number of complications during hospitalization. At the same time, the time interval >12 h from the onset of the typical symptoms of myocardial infarction (MI) until revascularization, as well as multiple stents implantations during PPCI, correlated with an increased incidence of short-term complications. The no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI was associated with an unfavorable short-term prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Randomised controlled trials have shown diverse results for radial access in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Moreover, it is questionable whether radial access improves outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing PPCI. We aimed to investigate the outcome according to access site in patients with or without cardiogenic shock, in daily clinical practice., Methods: For the present analysis we included 9,980 patients undergoing PPCI between 2012 and 2018, registered in the multi-centre, nationwide registry on PCI for myocardial infarction (MI). In-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and net adverse clinical events (NACE) until discharge were compared between 4,498 patients with radial (45%) and 5,482 patients with femoral (55%) access., Results: Radial compared to femoral access was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 7.7%; P<0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed reduced in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43 to 0.75]. Furthermore, MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.78) as well as NACE (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.75) occurred less frequently in patients with radial access. Interaction analysis with cardiogenic shock showed an effect modification, resulting in lower mortality in PCI via radial access in patients without, but no difference in those with cardiogenic shock (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.96)., Conclusions: Radial access for patients with acute MI undergoing PPCI is associated with improved survival in a large contemporary cohort of daily practice. However, this beneficial effect is restricted to hemodynamically stable patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-20-977). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cases with no-reflow increased significantly and accounted for about 5-50% of cases in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) patients in recent years. It is important to identify patients at high risk of no-reflow. Ingredients of compound danshen dripping pills (CDDP), a popular Chinese traditional medicine, can alleviate myocardial ischemia, inhibit inflammation and angiotensin convert enzyme, and reduce cell apoptosis, among other effects. In this study, we aimed to assess whether long-term treatment with CDDP (>1 year, could reduce the no-reflow phenomenon in non-diabetes mellitus (DM) patients after PPCI for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Methods: We enrolled patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical and PPCI data were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to history of CDDP therapy. Data of the CDDP group and non-CDDP group were compared. Single and multivariate analysis was used to find factors associated with no-reflow., Results: Among these 399 patients, the no-reflow phenomenon occurred in 96 patients (24.1%). The results showed that patients with long-term CDDP treatment had lower incidence of no-reflow than those without CDDP treatment within 1 year (9/68 vs. 87/331, 13.2% vs. 26.3%, P=0.0219). Univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified a few admission parameters associated with the no-reflow phenomenon: prior myocardial infarction (MI) [odds ratio (OR) 3.13, 95% CI: 1.42-4.89], systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mmHg (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28-4.06), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28-4.06), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (OR 3.76, 95% CI: 1.31-9.75), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (OR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.17-3.29), ejection fraction (EF) (OR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09-3.28), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05-4.23), anterior wall infarction (OR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.69-5.76), and long-term CDDP treatment (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.89-0.21)., Conclusions: Prior MI, SBP, cTnT, hs-CRP, BNP, and IL-6 on admission, along with EF, LVEDD, and anterior wall infarction are all predictors for no-reflow phenomenon. Long-term treatment with CDDP can reduce no-reflow phenomenon.

Background: We determined whether it is feasible to identify important changes in care management resulting from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway from hospital episode data, in order to construct a composite primary outcome (hypothesised to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac-related events, MACE) to compare patients exposed to CMR or not.Methods: We used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) to identify clinical events that reflected important changes in management in the year following the index admission in five subgroups of patients who activated the PPCI pathway recruited as part of a feasibility cohort study (n = 1655 with HES/PEDW data). For all subgroups, we identified frequency of events and time to the first event for each change in management.Results: We identified all clinical events (new diagnoses, additional diagnostic tests and procedures) except for medication prescriptions. Diagnostic tests were underestimated because most are carried out in outpatient clinics and outpatient datasets had missing procedure codes for 74% of patients (some tests done in hospital may also not be recorded). We successfully tabulated frequencies of events and distributions of times to first event for most changes in management by CMR status and in CMR / non CMR centres.Conclusions: It is feasible to identify changes in care management between patients who have / do not have CMR within relevant patient subgroups. Further work to derive a weighting algorithm is required before attempting to combine the events in a composite endpoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to observe the effects of the intracoronary and peripheral venous administration of nicorandil for the postoperative myocardial microcirculation and short-term prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment., Methods: A total of 140 STEMI patients were divided into three groups according to different patterns of administration: sequential nicorandil group, intracoronary nicorandil group and control group. The main observation indexes included coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion immediately after PPCI, while the secondary observation indexes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the period of hospitalization., Results: After PPCI, the difference in the proportion of patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.036), where this proportion was higher in the sequential nicorandil group and intracoronary nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.022 and P=0.047); The difference in corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.022), where CTFC was lower in the sequential nicorandil group and intracoronary nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.010, P=0.031); The differences in the proportion of patients with complete ST resolution (STR) and advancing of enzyme peak time to within 12 h between each two groups were statistically significant (P<0.001), where this proportion was the highest in the sequential nicorandil group; The difference in the CK-MB peak among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.036), where the CK-MB peak was lower in the sequential nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.012); The difference in the incidence of MACE between each two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001), where this incidence was the lowest in the sequential nicorandil group; The differences in the proportion of patients with advancing of enzyme peak time to within 14 h and LVEF among the three groups were not statistically significant (P=0.722 and P=0.284)., Conclusions: Compared with intracoronary use alone, the intracoronary and peripheral intravenous use of nicorandil can better improve myocardial microcirculation and short-term prognosis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.