Back to Search Start Over

Teaching peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to surgeons in practice: an "into the fire" pre/post-test curriculum.

Authors :
Kishiki, Tomokazu
Lapin, Brittany
Wang, Chi
Jonson, Brandon
Patel, Lava
Zapf, Matthew
Gitelis, Matthew
Cassera, Maria A.
Swanström, Lee L.
Ujiki, Michael B.
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques. Mar2018, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p1414-1421. 8p. 6 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold>Introduction: </bold>With the increasing adoption of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a first-line therapy for achalasia as well as a growing list of other indications, it is apparent that there is a need for effective training methods for both endoscopists in training and those already in practice. We present a hands-on-focused with pre- and post-testing methodology to teach these skills.<bold>Methods: </bold>Six POEM courses were taught by 11 experienced POEM endoscopists at two independent simulation laboratories. The training curriculum included a pre-training test, lectures and discussion, mentored hands-on instruction using live porcine and ex-plant models, and a post-training test. The scoring sheet for the pre- and post-tests assessed the POEM performance with a Likert-like scale measuring equipment setup, mucosotomy creation, endoscope navigation, visualization, myotomy, and closure. Participants were stratified by their experience with upper-GI endoscopy (Novices <100 cases vs. Experts ≥100 cases), and their data were analyzed and compared.<bold>Results: </bold>Sixty-five participants with varying degrees of experience in upper-GI endoscopy and laparoscopic achalasia cases completed the training curriculum. Participants improved knowledge scores from 69.7 ± 17.1 (pre-test) to 87.7 ± 10.8 (post-test) (p < 0.01). POEM performance increased from 15.1 ± 5.1 to 25.0 ± 5.5 (out of 30) (p < 0.01) with the greatest gains in mucosotomy [1.7-4.4 (out of 5), p < 0.01] and equipment (3.4-4.7, p < 0.01). Novices had significantly lower pre-test scores compared with Experts in upper-GI endoscopy (overall pre-score: 11.9 ± 5.6 vs. 16.3 ± 4.6, p < 0.01). Both groups improved significantly after the course, and there were no differences in post-test scores (overall post-score: 23.9 ± 6.6 vs. 25.4 ± 5.1, p = 0.34) between Novices and Experts.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A multimodal curriculum with procedural practice was an effective curricular design for teaching POEM to practitioners. The curriculum was specifically helpful for training surgeons with less upper-GI endoscopy experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
32
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127931528
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5823-3