Back to Search Start Over

Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Authors :
Porcari, Irene
Zorzato, Pier Carlo
Bosco, Mariachiara
Garzon, Simone
Magni, Francesca
Salvatore, Stefano
Franchi, Massimo P.
Uccella, Stefano
Source :
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Jul2024, Vol. 166 Issue 1, p173-189. 17p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Previous reviews on hysterectomy versus uterine‐sparing surgery in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair did not consider that the open abdominal approach or transvaginal mesh use have been largely abandoned. Objectives: To provide up‐to‐date evidence by examining only studies investigating techniques currently in use for POP repair. Search Strategy: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Selection Criteria: We included randomized and non‐randomized studies comparing surgical procedures for POP with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Studies describing open abdominal approaches or transvaginal mesh implantation were excluded. Data Collection and Analysis: A random effect meta‐analysis was conducted on extracted data reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (OR) between groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main Results: Thirty‐eight studies were included. Hysterectomy and uterine‐sparing procedures did not differ in reoperation rate (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.74–1.17), intraoperative major (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.79–2.26) and minor (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.79–2.4) complications, postoperative major (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.85–2.37) and minor (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.9–1.53) complications, and objective (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.92–2.07) or subjective (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.8–1.88) success. Uterine preservation was associated with a shorter operative time (−22.7 min; 95% CI –16.92 to −28.51 min), shorter hospital stay (−0.35 days, 95% CI –0.04 to −0.65 days), and less blood loss (−61.7 mL; 95% CI –31.3 to −92.1 mL). When only studies using a laparoscopic approach for both arms were considered, no differences were observed in investigated outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: No major differences were observed in POP outcomes between procedures with and without concomitant hysterectomy. The decision to preserve or remove the uterus should be tailored on individual factors. Synopsis: In women with indication for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse, the decision to preserve or remove the uterus should be tailored on individual factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00207292
Volume :
166
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178021212
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15343