Back to Search Start Over

Improving Professional Practice in the Disclosure of a Diagnosis of Dementia: A Modeling Experiment to Evaluate a Theory-Based Intervention.

Authors :
Eccles, Martin P.
Francis, Jill
Foy, Robbie
Johnston, Marie
Bamford, Claire
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Hughes, Julian
Lecouturier, Jan
Steen, Nick
Whitty, Paula M.
Source :
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine; Dec2009, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p377-387, 11p, 5 Charts
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Among health professionals, there is wide variation in the practice of disclosing a diagnosis of dementia to patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of one theory-based and two pragmatic interventions on intention to perform three behaviors, namely (1) finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis; (2) using the actual words “dementia” or “Alzheimer’s disease” when talking to the patient (i.e., the use of explicit terminology); (3) exploring what the diagnosis means to the patient. Within an intervention-modeling process, members of old-age mental health teams in England were sent postal questionnaires measuring psychological variables. Respondents were randomized by team to one of four groups to receive: theory-based intervention; evidence-based communication; patient-based intervention; or no intervention (control). Interventions were delivered as pen-and-paper exercises at the start of a second postal questionnaire that remeasured the same psychological variables. The outcome measures were intention and scenario-based behavioral simulation. Responses were received from 644 of 1,103 (58%) individuals from 179 of 205 (87%) mental health teams. There were no significant differences in terms of intention or simulated behavior between the trial groups. The theory-based intervention significantly increased scores for attitudes to ( p = 0.03) and perceived behavioral control ( p = 0.001) for the behavior of “finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis.” The intervention had a limited effect. This may be partly explained by clinical or methodological factors. The use of a systematic intervention modeling process allows clearer understanding of the next appropriate steps which should involve further evaluation of the interventions using an interactive delivery method in a less selected group of study participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10705503
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
45707296
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-008-9023-3