Authorship disputes may arise in the academic world in the student-supervisor relationship. Questions such as "Should the supervisor be directly added as an author to a paper based on the thesis?", "Should the student or the supervisor be the first author in the article?", " Should the order of authorship be determined by academic title if there are more than one author?" or similar questions may arise in the student-supervisor relationship, even if they are not spoken aloud. Author refers to the person or persons who have "contributed to the creation of the study at a level that deserves the title of authorship". Therefore, in the article, only those who have contributed enough to deserve the authorship should be indicated as authors. The ranking of authors should be ordered from the highest to the lowest according to the "contribution rate" of those who have contributed enough to deserve the title of authorship. This ranking should not be changed by considering the authors' administrative or academic titles. "How will it be determined whether a "contribution at a level that merits authorship" has been made? This question has been answered by CRediT: Contributor Roles Taxonomy. CRediT is a taxonomy that includes 14 types of contributions used to identify the roles played by contributors to research and publication. These contribution types are listed as; "Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing". Each of these contributions represents the labour of the contributor. To be recognized as an author, it is necessary to have contributed in at least three of these roles. The contribution rate of the authors in the studies can be scored under the titles of "Conceptualization (CRediT 1), Data Curation (CRediT 2), Research - Formal Analysis - Validation (CRediT 3-4-6-11), Writing – Original Draft (CRediT 12-13) and Review & Editing (CRediT 14)" as recommended in the ISNAD Citation System. The Funding acquisition (CRediT 5) provided for the study must also be mentioned in the text. Persons or institutions that have not contributed to the study at a level that deserves authorship are thanked by indicating their names. If the authors have used artificial intelligence-supported technologies in the preparation of the study, it would also be useful to indicate how they used these technologies. The criteria for their use are currently being debated all over the world. To prevent such disputes, it is important to determine unambiguous authorship criteria. For this purpose, the title "Capturing Author Contributions" will be added to the third edition of the ISNAD Citation Style to be published in 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]