Search

Purpose: Tumor microenvironment (TME) immune markers have been correlated with both response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Here, immune-cell activity of breast cancer tumors was inferred by expression-based analysis to determine if it is prognostic and/or predictive of response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel-based therapy in the GeparSepto (G7) trial (NCT01583426). Experimental Design: Pre-study biopsies from 279 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer in the G7 trial underwent RNA-seq-based profiling of 104 immune-cell-specific genes to assess inferred Immune Cell Activity (iICA) of 23 immune-cell types. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify tumors as iICA “hot,” “warm,” or “cold” by comparison of iICA in the G7 cohort relative to that of 1,467 samples from a tumor database established by Nantomics LLC. Correlations between iICA cluster, pathology-assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and hormone receptor (HR) status for pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined. Results: iICA cluster correlated with TIL levels. The highest pCR rates were observed in hot cluster tumors, and those with relatively higher TILs. Greater inferred activity of several T-cell types was significantly associated with pCR and survival. DFS and OS were prolonged in patients with hot or warm cluster tumors, the latter particularly for HR negative tumors, even if TILs were relatively low. Conclusions: Overall, TIL level better predicted pCR, but iICA cluster better predicted survival. Differences in associations between TILs, cluster, pCR, and survival were observed for HR-positive tumors versus HR-negative tumors, suggesting expanded study of the implication of these findings is warranted.

Pathogenic variants of the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast cancers; they are also becoming increasingly important to identify whether patients are suitable for targeted therapy with poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and BRCA1/2 germline mutations can benefit significantly from PARPi therapy, and the findings of the OlympiAD and the EMBRACA phase III clinical trials for regulatory approval were recently expanded by the addition of the most recent OlympiA data on the treatment of patients with early disease and a high risk of recurrence.This means that BRCA1/2 germline testing to plan patient therapy is now also relevant for patients with early breast cancer and therefore has a direct impact on survival. Healthcare research data shows, however, that BRCA1/2 testing rates are strongly affected by familial history, cancer subtype (particularly triple-negative subtypes), and patient age at onset of disease (especially with regards to younger patients with breast cancer), despite the existing clear recommendations for BRCA1/2 germline testing to identify whether PARPi therapy is indicated.This article presents the clinical implications of identifying BRCA1/2 germline mutations in patients with breast cancer, the current recommendations on molecular diagnostics, and their implementation in practice. The treatment of patients with breast cancer has progressed greatly in recent years and now offers individual treatment concepts which can only be implemented after the targeted identification of individual parameters.As detection of a BRCA1/2 germline mutation is essential for planning individual therapy, where indicated, testing should be arranged as early as possible. It is the only way of identifying patients suitable for PARPi therapy and ensuring they receive the best possible treatment. This also applies to patients with a negative familial history, HR-positive disease, or who are older at onset of disease.

Background: Imlunestrant is a novel, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with pure antagonistic properties that result in sustained inhibition of estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent gene transcription and cell growth. In a phase 1 study, imlunestrant monotherapy showed favourable safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy in heavily pre-treated ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer patients (Jhaveri ASCO 2022). Here, we present pharmacodynamic (PD) data from the preoperative window of opportunity (WOO) study (EMBER-2, NCT04647487), evaluating the biological activity of imlunestrant monotherapy in ER+, HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC). Methods: Post-menopausal women with stage I–III operable ER+ (>50%) or Allred score >5, HER2- untreated EBC ≥1 cm in diameter were randomized 1:1 to imlunestrant 400 mg once daily (QD) or imlunestrant 800 mg QD for 15 days (treatment window of -2 to +7 days) up to the surgery date. Pre- and on-treatment tumor samples were compared for changes in PD biomarkers. Primary study objective was change in ER expression (measured by IHC and quantified by H-score). Secondary objectives were change in progesterone receptor (PR) expression (measured by IHC and quantified by H-score) and Ki-67 (measured by IHC and expressed by percentage positive scoring) along with evaluation of safety and tolerability. Results: From Apr 28, 2021, to Mar 11, 2022, 58 patients were enrolled of which 54 were biomarker-evaluable for ER expression (400 mg: n = 28; 800 mg: n = 26). Patient demographics and tumor characteristics for all enrolled patients were similar across cohorts, with a median age of 64 years (50-83), 72% invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 28% invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), 59% stage I, 36% stage II and 5% stage III disease. 91% of the patients had a compliance rate higher than 80%. Among biomarker evaluable patients, relative reduction in PD biomarkers after a median of 15 days (range 13 to 23 days) of treatment are presented in Table 1. There was no significant difference in PD biomarker modulation noted between the two imlunestrant doses (400 mg vs 800 mg) or based on tumor histology (IDC, ILC). Imlunestrant was well tolerated. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were mainly grade 1, most commonly: fatigue (10%), diarrhea (9%), hot flushes (7%), and nausea (5%). There were no TRAEs of diarrhea and nausea observed at the 400 mg dose. No grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported. Conclusion: Imlunestrant demonstrated evidence of target engagement along with consistent biological activity across all evaluated dose levels and was well tolerated in an EBC population, further supporting continued adjuvant development in the ongoing EMBER-4 study. Additional biomarker analyses for the EMBER-2 study are also planned. Table 1. Relative reduction in PD biomarkers from Baseline to Day 15 Citation Format: Patrick Neven, Nicole Stahl, Maria Vidal, Miguel Martín, Nadia Harbeck, Peter A. Kaufman, Francois-Clement Bidard, Peter A. Fasching, Philippe Aftimos, Erika Hamilton, Stacey Carter, Peter Schmid, Duncan Wheatley, Manali Bhave, Kelly K. Hunt, Swati A. Kulkarni, Roohi Ismail-Khan, Claudia Karacsonyi, Shawn T. Estrem, Umut Ozbek, Bastien Nguyen, Eva Ciruelos. A preoperative window-of-opportunity study of imlunestrant in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: Results from the EMBER-2 study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-06.

Background: Breast cancer with low HER2 expression (HER2-low) is of high clinical relevance because of new therapeutic options with antibody-drug conjugates. We have recently shown in a large cohort from neoadjuvant clinical trials that HER2-low breast cancer has different molecular characteristics as well as different clinical outcomes compared to HER2-zero. Considering the positive correlation between HER2-low expression and hormone receptor positivity observed consistently in many investigations, we have extended our analysis to HR+ tumors from the post-neoadjuvant PenelopeB trial. In PenelopeB, patients with HR+ breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were randomized to post-neoadjuvant palbociclib versus placebo in addition to endocrine therapy. We evaluated the molecular phenotype and clinical outcomes of HER2-low compared to HER2-zero patients. Methods: A total of 1250 patients were randomized, HER2 status was available for 1151 tumors from pretherapeutic core biopsy, determined mainly by local pathology, and from 1213 tumors from the post-NACT sample, determined as part of central pathology. For 1119 patients a paired HER2-status was both available. HER2-zero was defined as IHC0 and HER2-low-positive was defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-. Gene expression analysis of 2549 genes using the HTG oncology biomarker panel was performed in 620 pretherapeutic biopsies and 780 post-NACT residual tumor samples, with 539 paired gene expression samples. Breast cancer subtypes were determined using the AIMS approach. Results: In pretherapeutic biopsies, 695 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 457 (40%) were HER2-zero. A HER2-low status in the biopsy was significantly linked to improved iDFS (HR 0.76 (0.60-0.96; p=0.02). In residual tumors, 632 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 581 (40%) were HER2-zero, without any prognostic impact of HER2 low status. In addition, a shift of HER2-low-status comparing core biopsy and residual tumor was observed in 415 (37%) of 1119 tumors. 161 (14%) had a shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low and 254 (23%) shifted from HER2-low to HER2-zero. A shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low in the post-NACT samples was significantly linked to reduced iDFS (HR 1.43 [95%CI 1.01-2.01]), p=0.04), compared to HER2-low group, while a shift from HER2-low to HER2-zero was associated with better iDFS compared to HER2-zero group, although not statistically significant (p=0.17). We did not observe a significant correlation of HER2-low status and AIMS molecular subtypes. In particular, the HER2-enriched (HER2E) subtype was assigned to only 4.3% of HER2-zero and 3.1% of HER2-low tumors. Significant iDFS differences were observed for HER2-low-status in combination with AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E vs. lumA/normL; overall p-value < 0.0001) for both pretherapeutic biopsies and residual tumor. Patients with post-NACT HER2-low tumors had an improved survival in the subgroups of aggressive AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E), but not in the less aggressive AIMs subtypes (lumA/normL), with a positive test for interaction (p=0.02). For the pre-NACT samples a similar, but non-significant trend was observed. We evaluated a total of 620 core biopsies for differences in gene expression comparing HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. A total of 417 genes were statistically significantly different, but in a hierarchical clustering there was no clear separation of HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. Conclusions: In the PenelopeB cohort of HR+ tumors, a HER2-low status in pretherapeutic core biopsies is related to improved disease-free survival, especially for those tumors that have a more aggressive intrinsic subtype. A shift of HER2-low status was observed before and after chemotherapy, indicating an adaptation of the pathway activity to therapy-induced stress, which might become relevant for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Miguel Martín, Michael Untch, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Erik S. Knudsen, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Laura Van ’t Veer, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry D. Bear, Nicole McCarthy, Karen Gelmon, Frederik Marmé, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Martin Filipits, Lesley-Ann Martin, Peter A. Fasching, Christian Schem, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Masakazu Toi, Hope Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Yuan Liu, Karsten Weber, Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda, Sibylle Loibl. HER2-06 Outcome analysis of HER2-zero or HER2-low hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients - characterization of the molecular phenotype in combination with molecular subtyping [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-06.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Umfangreiche Daten aus prospektiven klinischen Studien liefern einen hohen Evidenzgrad für den Einsatz von CDK4/6-Hemmern in Kombination mit einer endokrinen Therapie (CDK4/6i + ET) als Standard bei der First-Line-Behandlung von metastatischem HER2-negativen hormonrezeptorpositiven (HER2−/HR+) Brustkrebs. Reale Daten von Patientinnengruppen, die damit in der Praxis behandelt wurden, liefern Erkenntnisse über Veränderungen von Patientenmerkmalen und Prognosen im Laufe der Zeit. Methoden Die Daten wurden dem prospektiven praxisbezogenen PRAEGNANT-Register (NCT02 338 167) entnommen. Die eingeschlossenen Patientinnen hatten fortgeschrittenen primären und metastasierten HER2−/HR+ Brustkrebs. Die gewählten Therapien, das progressionsfreie Überleben und das Gesamtüberleben der jeweiligen Therapie sowie die Zeitspanne, während der die Behandlung erfolgte, werden dargelegt. Ergebnisse Nachdem CDK4/6-Hemmer erstmals im November 2016 eingesetzt wurden, stieg die Häufigkeit ihres Einsatzes schnell an. In den letzten Jahren (2018–2022) wurden ca. 70–80 % aller Patientinnengruppen mit CDK4/6-Hemmern behandelt; eine endokrine Monotherapie wurde rund 10 % und eine Chemotherapie ungefähr 15 % aller Patientinnen verabreicht. Die schlechteste Prognose hatten Patientinnen, die eine Chemotherapie erhielten. Seit Kurzem erhalten hauptsächlich Patientinnen mit guter Prognose eine endokrine Monotherapie; Patientinnen, die eine Chemotherapie erhalten, haben eine ungünstigere Prognose. Das progressionsfreie Überleben und das Gesamtüberleben von mit CDK4/6i + ET behandelten Patientinnen blieb über einen längeren Zeitraum ähnlich, obwohl sich die Patientenmerkmale änderten. Schlussfolgerung Die Behandlung mit CDK4/6i + ET entwickelte sich rasch zum First-Line-Therapiestandard für Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Mammakarzinom. Seit der Einführung von CDK4/6i + ET wird die endokrine Monotherapie nur bei Patientinnen mit einer sehr günstigen Prognose eingesetzt, während Chemotherapie meist nur an Patientinnen verabreicht wird, die eine eher ungünstige Prognose haben. Veränderungen der Patientenmerkmale scheinen die Prognose von mit CDK4/6i + ET behandelten Patientinnen nicht zu beeinflussen.

ZusammenfassungFür die Behandlung von Patientinnen mit fortgeschrittenem HER2-negativem, hormonrezeptorpositivem Mammakarzinom sind in den letzten Jahren einige Substanzen in die Praxis eingeführt worden. Zusätzlich sind weitere Medikamente in der Entwicklung. Im letzten Jahr sind einige Studien veröffentlicht worden, die entweder einen Vorteil für das progressionsfreie Überleben oder aber auch für das Gesamtüberleben gezeigt haben. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die neuesten Ergebnisse, welche auf aktuellen Kongressen oder in Fachzeitschriften veröffentlicht wurden, zusammen und ordnet sie in den klinischen Behandlungskontext ein. Insbesondere wird auf den Stellenwert einer Therapie mit CDK4/6 Inhibitoren, Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan, Sacituzumab-Govitecan und Capivasertib eingegangen. Für Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan wurde in der Destiny-Breast-04-Studie ein Gesamtüberlebensvorteil bei HER2-negativem Mammakarzinom mit einer niedrigen HER2-Expression (HER2-low expression) berichtet. Ebenso konnte ein Gesamtüberlebensvorteil in der FAKTION-Studie mit Capivasertib verzeichnet werden. Nach dem fehlenden Gesamtüberlebensvorteil für Palbociclib in der 1. Therapielinie stellt sich hier die Frage nach der klinischen Einordnung.

Purpose: In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT. Experimental Design: Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined. Results: T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32–3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56–1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44–1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59–1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples. Conclusions: T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.

The presence of macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is an important factor influencing survival for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). More research is needed to identify factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed 12 lifestyle and personal exposures known to be related to ovarian cancer risk or inflammation to identify those associated with having residual disease after surgery.This analysis used data on 2054 patients with advanced stage HGSC from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The exposures were body mass index, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use, endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, incomplete pregnancy, menopausal hormone therapy use, menopausal status, parity, smoking, and tubal ligation. Logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between these exposures and having residual disease following PCS.Menopausal estrogen-only therapy (ET) use was associated with 33% lower odds of having macroscopic residual disease compared to never use (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.46-0.97, p = 0.033). Compared to nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had 36% lower odds of having residual disease (OR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.94, p = 0.022), while there was no association among parous women who breastfed (OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.65-1.25, p = 0.53).The association between ET and having no macroscopic residual disease is plausible given a strong underlying biologic hypothesis between this exposure and diagnosis with HGSC. If this or the parity finding is replicated, these factors could be included in risk stratification models to determine whether HGSC patients should receive PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

In the KEYNOTE-355 (KN355) trial, pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy and manageable safety compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with PD-L1 positive (Combined Positive Score [CPS]≥ 10) tumours. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of pembrolizumab measured by quality-adjusted survival in the trial population.The study used data from the final analysis of KN355. The Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis was used to compare treatments of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Patients' survival time was partitioned into three health states - toxicity before disease progression (TOX), time without symptoms or toxicity before disease progression (TWiST), and relapse (REL). Utilities for these health states were estimated using EuroQol-5 Dimensions, 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) data collected in KN355. Q-TWiST was derived as the utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations.Patients randomised to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had 3.7 months greater Q-TWiST (relative gain of 18%; P = 0.003) compared to those randomised to chemotherapy at the median follow-up of 44 months, and 4.3 months greater Q-TWiST (relative gain of 20%; P = 0.004) at the maximum follow-up of 52 months. The Q-TWiST gain increased with longer follow-up time.Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in Q-TWiST compared to chemotherapy in previously untreated PD-L1-positive mTNBC.

ZusammenfassungIn dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden neueste Entwicklungen in der Prävention von Brustkrebs und Behandlung von Patientinnen mit frühen Krankheitsstadien mit Mammakarzinom zusammengefasst. Die Ermittlung von individuellen Erkrankungsrisiken nach molekularen Subtypen wurde in einer großen epidemiologischen Studie untersucht. Im Bereich der Behandlung gibt es neue Daten zur Langzeitnachbeobachtung der Aphinity-Studie ebenso wie neue Daten zur neoadjuvanten Therapie von HER2-positiven Patientinnen mit Atezolizumab. Biomarker wie Residual Cancer Burden wurden im Zusammenhang mit einer Pembrolizumab-Therapie untersucht. Eine Untersuchung des Genomic-Grade-Indexes bei älteren Patientinnen reiht sich ein in die Gruppe von Studien, die versucht, durch moderne Multigentests Patientinnen zu identifizieren, bei denen eine Chemotherapie vermieden werden kann, weil diese eine exzellente Prognose haben. Diese und weitere Aspekte der neuesten Entwicklungen bei der Diagnostik und Therapie des Mammakarzinoms werden in dieser Übersichtsarbeit beschrieben.

ZusammenfassungFür Patientinnen mit einem fortgeschrittenen Mammakarzinom sind in den letzten Jahren mit den CDK4/6‑Inhibitoren, den Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitoren, den PARP-Inhibitoren, dem Alpelisib, Tucatinib und Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan sowie Sacituzumab-Govitecan einige Therapien neu etabliert worden, welche die Therapielandschaft von Patientinnen mit einem fortgeschrittenen Mammakarzinom deutlich verändert bzw. erweitert haben. Einige dieser Substanzen sind mittlerweile auch bei frühen Krankheitsstadien zugelassen bzw. eine Zulassung ist in naher Zukunft wahrscheinlich, sodass sich die Therapielandschaft abermals ändern wird. Die Einführung neuer Substanzen und das Verständnis der Progressions- und Effektivitätsmechanismen für diese Substanzen steht deswegen im Fokus der aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Bemühungen. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die neuen Entwicklungen basierend auf aktuellen Publikationen und Kongressen zusammengefasst. Erkenntnisse zur Behandlung von Patientinnen mit einem HER2-positiven Mammakarzinom und Hirnmetastasen werden ebenso dargestellt wie eine Reihe von Studien, die sich mit Biomarkern bei Patientinnen mit HER2-negativem, hormonrezeptorpositivem Mammakarzinom beschäftigen. Insbesondere die Einführung der oralen, selektiven Östrogenrezeptor-Degradierer birgt neue Chancen, eine biomarkerbasierte Therapie zu etablieren. Die molekulare Diagnostik etabliert sich als diagnostischer Marker und Verlaufsparameter.

Background: The GeparOLA study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel (P) plus olaparib (O) as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, either hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HR-negative and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) defined as having a g/tBRCA mutation and/or a high HRD score. Primary analysis showed a pCR rate of 55.1% (90% CI 44.5%-65.3%) with PO and 48.6% (90% CI 34.3%-63.2%) with P plus carboplatinum (Cb). The PO combination could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm but was significantly better tolerated. Analysis on the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients < 40 years and HR-positive tumors (Fasching Ann Oncol 2020). Here, we report long-term data. Methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a non-comparative, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD and indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and TNBC or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to receive either P 80 mg/m2 weekly plus O 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus Cb area under the curve 2 (AUC2) weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by four cycles of either 2-weekly or 3-weekly epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) rate after NACT with PO followed by EC. Long-term efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-to-event endpoints analysis is planned with median follow-up of at least 4 years and a follow-up completeness of at least 80%. Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 274 patients were screened, of whom 107 were randomized and 106 (PO N=69; PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 32 patients were aged < 40 years; 36.2% of patients had cT1 tumors and 31.8% were cN-positive; the majority (86.8%) had grade 3 tumors and a Ki-67>20% (89.6%). Seventy-seven patients (72.6%) had TNBC. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months (range 0.1-69.1), 18 (15 in PO; 3 in PCb) iDFS events and 7 (6 in PO; 1 in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year survival rates are shown in the table below. iDFS (HR PO to PCb=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.9], log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (HR =3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67], log-rank p=0.129), and OS (HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.2], log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA mutation seem to benefit from the use of carboplatinum (7/30 iDFS/DDFS events in PO; 0/16 in PCb, log-rank p=0.037, HR n.a.). Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative and HRD breast cancer the use of olaparib instead of carboplatinum although showing comparable pCR rates, tended to result in an overall inferior outcome. This was mainly driven by the patients without a g/tBRCA mutation. In patients with a g/t BRCA mutation no difference between olaparib and carboplatinum was seen. Key words: Olaparib, HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD, survival Funding: The study was financially supported by AstraZeneca Citation Format: Peter A. Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Sabine Seiler, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Christoph Uleer, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-13.

Introduction: Improvement of systemic treatment of TNBC represents an unmet medical need. Targeted therapy of regulatory immune pathways has become an important option in the treatment of many malignant diseases including breast cancer. Neodjuvant trials combining chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors (KEYNOTE-522 and IMpassion031) have demonstrated a meaningful benefit regarding pathological complete remission (pCR) for the addition of PD-1- or PD-L1-inhibitors to chemotherapy in patients with TNBC. In the KEYNOTE-522 trial, the addition of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy also had a beneficial impact on event-free survival even in patients who did not achieve a pCR. Of note, in the neoadjuvant GeparNuevo trial only those patients with TNBC who received a 2-week checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy window before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with checkpoint inhibition, achieved a significant pCR benefit from the addition of the PD-1 inhibitor Durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Methods: NeoMono is a phase 2 randomized multicenter trial recruiting male and female patients with primary TNBC (defined as ER/PR < 10% and HER2 negative). Neoadjuvant treatment in Arm A and B consists of Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (i.e., 12 x Carboplatin and Paclitaxel q1w followed by Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide q3w). Combination therapy in arm A is preceded by an Atezolizumab monotherapy window (i.e., 840 mg Atezolizumab once two weeks prior to initiation of combination therapy). Study goals are to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Atezolizumab with and without an Atezolizumab two-week monotherapy window (primary endpoint: pCR) and the identification of biomarkers predicting (early) response to or resistance against Atezolizumab. The extensive translational program of the neoMono trial aims at identifying these biomarkers on tumor and patient level through analysis of sequential tissue and liquid biopsies. The NeoMono statistical design adapts the idea of a proof-of-concept trial and uses Bayesian posterior and predictive probabilities for inference about the primary hypothesis. Up to four planned efficacy interim analyses provide decision points for early stopping for success or futility. The expected maximum number of patients to be recruited is 458. Results: The predefined number of 50 patients in each arm being evaluable for the primary endpoint pCR has been reached and the results of the first planned interim analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The addition of an ICI to state of the art neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been established as a new standard of care in TNBC. NeoMono has the potential to answer the question if the beneficial effect of the ICI can be increased by a chemotherapy free ICI monotherapy window prior to a combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Hans-Christian Kolberg, Johannes Schumacher, Ramona Erber, Michael Braun, Bernhard Heinrich, Oliver Hoffmann, Peter A. Fasching, Georg Kunz, Michael P. Lux, Christian Schem, Eva-Maria Grischke, Mustafa Deryal, Kristina Lübbe, Arndt Hartmann, Sabine Kasimir-Bauer, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke. PD11-03 Comparison of a mono Atezolizumab window followed by Atezolizumab and chemotherapy with Atezolizumab and chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer – an interim analysis of the adaptive randomized neoadjuvant trial NeoMono [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-03.

Background Recently, we showed a >60% difference in 5-year survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) when stratified by a 101-gene mRNA expression prognostic signature. Given the varied patient outcomes, this study aimed to translate prognostic mRNA markers into protein expression assays by immunohistochemistry and validate their survival association in HGSC. Methods Two prognostic genes, FOXJ1 and GMNN, were selected based on high-quality antibodies, correlation with protein expression and variation in immunohistochemical scores in a preliminary cohort (n = 134 and n = 80, respectively). Six thousand four hundred and thirty-four (FOXJ1) and 5470 (GMNN) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian neoplasms (4634 and 4185 HGSC, respectively) represented on tissue microarrays from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium underwent immunohistochemical staining and scoring, then univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Results Consistent with mRNA, FOXJ1 protein expression exhibited a linear, increasing association with improved overall survival in HGSC patients. Women with >50% expression had the most favourable outcomes (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.91, p 35% GMNN expression showed a trend for better outcomes, though this was not significant. Conclusion We provide foundational evidence for the prognostic value of FOXJ1 in HGSC, validating the prior mRNA-based prognostic association by immunohistochemistry.

Purpose: Advanced-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) has poor chemotherapy response and prognosis and lacks biomarkers to aid stage I adjuvant treatment. Differentiating primary MOC from gastrointestinal (GI) metastases to the ovary is also challenging due to phenotypic similarities. Clinicopathologic and gene-expression data were analyzed to identify prognostic and diagnostic features. Experimental Design: Discovery analyses selected 19 genes with prognostic/diagnostic potential. Validation was performed through the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and GI cancer biobanks comprising 604 patients with MOC (n = 333), mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (MBOT, n = 151), and upper GI (n = 65) and lower GI tumors (n = 55). Results: Infiltrative pattern of invasion was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) within 2 years from diagnosis, compared with expansile pattern in stage I MOC [hazard ratio (HR), 2.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–7.41, P = 0.042]. Increased expression of THBS2 and TAGLN was associated with shorter OS in MOC patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.51, P = 0.016) and (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.45, P = 0.043), respectively. ERBB2 (HER2) amplification or high mRNA expression was evident in 64 of 243 (26%) of MOCs, but only 8 of 243 (3%) were also infiltrative (4/39, 10%) or stage III/IV (4/31, 13%). Conclusions: An infiltrative growth pattern infers poor prognosis within 2 years from diagnosis and may help select stage I patients for adjuvant therapy. High expression of THBS2 and TAGLN in MOC confers an adverse prognosis and is upregulated in the infiltrative subtype, which warrants further investigation. Anti-HER2 therapy should be investigated in a subset of patients. MOC samples clustered with upper GI, yet markers to differentiate these entities remain elusive, suggesting similar underlying biology and shared treatment strategies.

ZusammenfassungDie Erkenntnisse über die Behandlung von Mammakarzinompatientinnen mit frühen Krankheitsstadien haben im letzten Jahr deutlich zugenommen. Abemaciclib, Olaparib und Pembrolizumab sind neue Medikamente mit einer guten Wirksamkeit bei den entsprechenden Patientinnengruppen. Jedoch sind einige Fragestellungen nach wie vor unbeantwortet. Insbesondere welchen Patientinnen unnötige Therapien erspart werden können, ist bei prämenopausalen Patientinnen mit einem hormonrezeptorpositiven Mammakarzinom weiterhin unklar. Die Frage, inwieweit eine Chemotherapie einen direkten zytotoxischen Effekt auf den Tumor hat oder eher dadurch wirkt, dass die Ovarfunktion durch die Chemotherapie reduziert wird, könnte wegweisend sein. Dieser Patientinnengruppe kann möglicherweise eine Chemotherapie erspart bleiben. Neue, bislang experimentelle Biomarker-Analysemethoden, wie die räumliche Analyse der Genexpression (spatial transcriptomics), halten nach und nach Einzug in die großen randomisierten Phase-III-Studien, wie die NeoTRIPStudie. Dies führt wiederum zum besseren Verständnis der prädiktiven Faktoren neuer Therapien, zum Beispiel der Immuntherapie. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die wissenschaftlichen Neuerungen der aktuellen Kongresse wie dem San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2021, aber auch von kürzlich veröffentlichten Publikationen zusammen.

Background Comprehensive data from prospective clinical trials have led to a high level of evidence establishing CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatment (CDK4/6i + ET) as a standard for the treatment of HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HER2− HR+) breast cancer patients in the first-line advanced therapy setting. Data on patient populations that have been treated in the real-world setting may provide an insight into changes of patient characteristics and prognosis over time. Methods The data were extracted from the prospective real-world registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167). Patients had to have HER2− HR+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. The chosen therapies were described as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to the given therapies and time periods during which they were indicated. Results CDK4/6 inhibitors have been rapidly implemented since their introduction in November 2016. In recent years (2018 – 2022), about 70 – 80% of the patient population have been treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, while endocrine monotherapy was given to about 10% and chemotherapy to about 15% of all patients. The prognosis was worst in patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, mainly patients with a good prognosis are being treated with endocrine monotherapy, and patients who are treated with chemotherapy have an unfavorable prognosis. The PFS and OS of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET have remained similar over time despite changes in patient characteristics. Conclusion A treatment with CDK4/6i + ET has rapidly become the therapy standard for patients in the first-line advanced breast cancer setting. After the implementation of CDK4/6i + ET, endocrine monotherapy is only given to patients with a very favorable prognosis, while chemotherapy is provided to patients with a rather unfavorable prognosis. These changes in patient characteristics did not seem to influence the prognosis of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET.

ZusammenfassungIm vergangenen Jahr wurden für viele Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom in frühem Krankheitsstadium neue und effektive Optionen für eine weitere Verbesserung der Behandlungsergebnisse gezeigt. Für Patientinnen mit hormonrezeptorpositiver Erkrankung zeigte sich ein signifikanter Zusatzeffekt durch den Einsatz des CDK4/6-Inhibitors Abemaciclib zusätzlich zur endokrinen adjuvanten Therapie. Bei triple-negativer Erkrankung wurden Daten für 2 Therapieprinzipien gezeigt. Patientinnen mit fortgeschrittener Erkrankung (Stadium 2 und 3) profitieren von dem neoadjuvanten Einsatz des Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitors Pembrolizumab unabhängig von der PD‑L1-Expression in Kombination mit einer Standardchemotherapie. Bei BRCA1- oder BRCA2-Mutation wurde ein eindrucksvoller Benefit durch den Einsatz des PARP-Inhibitors Olaparib gezeigt, wenn die neoadjuvante Therapie nicht zur gewünschten Remission geführt hat. Weitere Daten betreffen translationale Fragestellungen beim HER2-positiven Mammakarzinom sowie neoadjuvante Therapieansätze mit dem oralen SERD Giredestrant und dem PARP-Inhibitor Talazoparib. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die Ergebnisse der wichtigsten Studienergebnisse dieses Jahres vorgestellt und bewertet.

In patients with existing ovarian function, there are some special aspects to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR pos./HER2 neg.) breast cancer. Treatment options include tamoxifen with or without a GnRH analog, and aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analog. Furthermore, ovarian function is affected by previous chemotherapy. Both aromatase inhibitors (+GnRH analogs) and GnRH analogs in combination with tamoxifen are supposed to be indicated for patients at increased risk of recurrence.However, national and international guidelines and therapy recommendations do not provide a clear definition of intermediate or high risk; as a result, therapy decisions are often made for each patient on an individual basis. This is also reflected in the considerable variability at national and international levels, e.g., with regard to the use of aromatase inhibitors + GnRH analogs.This review summarizes the data on completed studies (e.g., SOFT, TEXT, EBCTCG meta-analyses) and the current multigene testing studies (TailorX, RxPonder, ADAPT), discusses the rationale for current studies (e.g., CLEAR-B), and looks ahead to future questions.

IMPORTANCE: Adjuvant denosumab might improve disease-free survival in hormone receptor (HR)–positive primary breast cancer (BC). The optimal neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel schedule in terms of efficacy and safety is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding denosumab to anthracycline/taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increases the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and which nab-paclitaxel schedule is more effective in the NACT setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The GeparX was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase 2b, 2 × 2 randomized clinical trial conducted by GBG and AGO-B at 38 German sites between February 2017 and March 2019. The analysis data set was locked September 4, 2020; analysis was completed November 13, 2020. Patients had unilateral or bilateral primary BC, stage cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c, with either clinically node-positive or pathologically node-positive or HR-negative disease, or Ki-67 proliferation index greater than 20%, or ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive BC. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive or not receive denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles, and either nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m(2) weekly for 12 weeks or days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (8 doses), followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, 90/600 mg/m(2) (every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks). Carboplatin was given in triple-negative BC (TNBC), and trastuzumab biosimilar ABP980 plus pertuzumab was given in ERBB2-positive BC (ERBB2-positive substudy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was pCR rates between arms for each randomization. RESULTS: A total of 780 female (n = 779) and male (n = 1) patients (median [range] age, 49.0 [22-80] years) were randomized to the 4 treatment groups. The pCR (ypT0 ypN0) rate was 41.0% (90% CI, 37%-45%) with denosumab vs 42.8% (90% CI, 39%-47%) (P = .58) without denosumab, irrespective of BC subtype. Nab-paclitaxel weekly resulted in a significantly (significance level of α = .10) higher pCR rate of 44.9% (90% CI, 41%-49%) vs 39.0% (90% CI, 35%-43%) (P = .06) with nab-paclitaxel days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The pCR rates for nab-paclitaxel schedules in subgroups were only significantly different for TNBC (60.4% vs 50.0%; P = .06). Grade 3 to 4 toxic effects did not differ with or without denosumab. Nonhematologic toxic effects of grade 3 to 4 were higher with nab-paclitaxel weekly (33.7% vs 24.1%; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, denosumab added to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT did not improve pCR rates. Nab-paclitaxel at a dosage of 125 mg/m(2) weekly significantly increased the pCR rate compared with the days 1 and 8, every-3-weeks schedule overall and in TNBC, but generated higher toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02682693

G7 trial design; demographics; tissue types; gene names; displayed data from additional analyses; statistical data

Purpose:Tumor microenvironment (TME) immune markers have been correlated with both response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Here, immune-cell activity of breast cancer tumors was inferred by expression-based analysis to determine if it is prognostic and/or predictive of response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel-based therapy in the GeparSepto (G7) trial (NCT01583426).Experimental Design:Pre-study biopsies from 279 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer in the G7 trial underwent RNA-seq-based profiling of 104 immune-cell-specific genes to assess inferred Immune Cell Activity (iICA) of 23 immune-cell types. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify tumors as iICA “hot,” “warm,” or “cold” by comparison of iICA in the G7 cohort relative to that of 1,467 samples from a tumor database established by Nantomics LLC. Correlations between iICA cluster, pathology-assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and hormone receptor (HR) status for pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined.Results:iICA cluster correlated with TIL levels. The highest pCR rates were observed in hot cluster tumors, and those with relatively higher TILs. Greater inferred activity of several T-cell types was significantly associated with pCR and survival. DFS and OS were prolonged in patients with hot or warm cluster tumors, the latter particularly for HR negative tumors, even if TILs were relatively low.Conclusions:Overall, TIL level better predicted pCR, but iICA cluster better predicted survival. Differences in associations between TILs, cluster, pCR, and survival were observed for HR-positive tumors versus HR-negative tumors, suggesting expanded study of the implication of these findings is warranted.

HER2, PD-L1, and Five-Gene Signature Quartile Analysis. IDFS by HER2 gene expression quartile (A) in the trastuzumab arm; and (B) in the T-DM1 arm; (C) treatment effect on IDFS by HER2 gene expression quartile; (D) effect of HER2 gene expression quartile on IDFS; IDFS by PD-L1 gene expression quartile (E) in the trastuzumab arm; and (F) in the T-DM1 arm; (G) treatment effect on IDFS by PD-L1 gene expression quartile; (H) effect of PD-L1 gene expression quartile on IDFS; IDFS by five-gene signature (i.e., PD-L1/granzymeB/CD8/IFNγ/CXCL9) gene expression quartile (I) in the trastuzumab arm; and (J) in the T-DM1 arm; (K) treatment effect on IDFS by five-gene signature gene expression quartile; (L) effect of five-gene signature gene expression quartile expression on IDFS. Each expression quartile (quartile 2, quartile 3, and quartile 4) is compared to the lowest quartile (quartile 1). The analyses are unstratified and adjusted using a Cox regression model that includes percent tumor in marked area, clinical stage at presentation, hormone receptor status, type of preoperative HER2-directed therapy, and pathologic nodal status. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDFS, invasive disease-free survival; IFNγ, interferon gamma; Q, quartile; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine.

Comparison of HER2 expression intensity in paired pre-NAT (i.e., before surgery) and post-NAT surgical samples. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy.

Comparison of pre-NAT and post-NAT surgical RNA-evaluable samples. (A) ERBB2 (i.e., HER2), CD274 (i.e., PD-L1), checkpoint inhibitor signature (i.e., PD-L1/PD-L2/IDO), CD8A (i.e., CD8), TEFF signature CD8/granzymeA/granzymeB/perforin/IFNγ), three-gene signature (i.e., PD-L1/IFNγ/CXCL9), five-gene signature (i.e., PD-L1/granzymeB/CD8/IFNγ/CXCL9), Th1 cytokine signature (i.e., CXCL9/CXCL10/CXCL11), and B cell gene expression. (B) Frequency of AIMS PAM50 subtypes overall and by hormone receptor status. (C) Frequency of AIMS PAM50 subtypes by level of HER2 protein expression assessed by IHC in pre- and post-NAT samples. (D) Frequency of AIMS PAM50 subtypes by level of HER2 gene expression in pre- and post-NAT samples. (E) Hallmark gene sets enriched for genes upregulated in post-NAT surgical versus pre-NAT samples (adjusted P < 0.05). (F) Hallmark gene sets enriched for genes downregulated in post-NAT surgical versus pre-NAT samples (adjusted P < 0.05). Differential gene expression and pathway analyses were adjusted for tumor content. (G) Multidimensional scaling plot showing the differences in gene expression profiles between pre-NAT and post-NAT surgical samples. AIMS, Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; IFNγ, interferon gamma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MDS, multidimensional scaling; Med, median; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; NEG, negative; NES, normalized enrichment score; PAM50, Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50; POS, positive; PR, progesterone receptor.

Supplementary Grant Support

Supplementary Figure S1. LocusZoom regional association plots for the seven new cross-cancer loci that were > 1 Mb from known index SNPs. Supplementary Figure S2A-B. Box plots showing eQTL associations between (A) rs9375701 and L3MBTL3 in normal breast and prostate tissues and (B) rs8037137 and RCCD1 in normal breast and ovarian tissues. Supplementary Figure S3. Interactions between BCL2L11 and the 32 Biocarta "Death Pathway" genes. Interactions were identified using the GeneMania server. Circles contain gene names, lines represent interactions, and the color of the line indicates a specific type of interaction as listed in the legend.

Supplementary Table S1. Known risk loci for each cancer. Supplementary Table S2. Regions where known index SNPs for at least two of the three cancers lie within 1 Mb of each other. Supplementary Table S3. Full results from the meta-analysis of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer showing the 18 independent loci associated at P < 10-8 with the same direction of effect across all three cancers. Supplementary Table S4. Conditional analysis of the rs1469713 (breast-ovarian-prostate cancer) signal, conditioning on the rs4808801 (breast cancer-specific) signal that was < 1 Mb away using GCTA software. Supplementary Table S5. Most significantly-associated genotyped SNP at new loci where index SNPs were imputed. Supplementary Table S6. Expression QTL analysis results from the GTEx Portal for the new cross-cancer risk loci listed in main Table 2. Supplementary Table S7. SNPs with P < 10-8 at the new cross-cancer risk loci listed in main Table 2 that overlap predicted enhancers in at least two cell types. Supplementary Table S8. HaploReg and non-coding RNA annotation of variants with P < 10-8 at the new cross-cancer risk loci listed in main Table 2. Supplementary Table S9. Eight of the 32 genes involved in induction of apoptosis through DR3 and DR4/5 Death Receptors (MSigDB: Biocarta "Death Pathway") a that were < 1 Mb away from an independent P < 10-5 index SNP in the 3-cancer meta-analysis. Supplementary Table S10. INRICH pathway analysis results for pathways with empirical P < 0.05. Apoptosis-related pathways containing BCL2L11 are shaded.

PDF file - 157K, Supplemental Table 1. Regulatory T cell genes included in this study (N=25). Supplemental Table 2. Regulatory T cell SNPs included in this study. Supplemental Table 3. Participating invasive epithelial ovarian cancer studies. Supplemental Table 4. Association between clinical variables and overall survival.

The presence of regulatory T cells (Treg) in solid tumors is known to play a role in patient survival in ovarian cancer and other malignancies. We assessed inherited genetic variations via 749 tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 25 Treg-associated genes (CD28, CTLA4, FOXP3, IDO1, IL10, IL10RA, IL15, 1L17RA, IL23A, IL23R, IL2RA, IL6, IL6R, IL8, LGALS1, LGALS9, MAP3K8, STAT5A, STAT5B, TGFB1, TGFB2, TGFB3, TGFBR1, TGRBR2, and TGFBR3) in relation to ovarian cancer survival. We analyzed genotype and overall survival in 10,084 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, including 5,248 high-grade serous, 1,452 endometrioid, 795 clear cell, and 661 mucinous carcinoma cases of European descent across 28 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). The strongest associations were found for endometrioid carcinoma and IL2RA SNPs rs11256497 [HR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22–1.64; P = 5.7 × 10−6], rs791587 (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17–1.57; P = 6.2 × 10−5), rs2476491 (HR, = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19–1.64; P = 5.6 × 10−5), and rs10795763 (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17–1.57; P = 7.9 × 10−5), and for clear cell carcinoma and CTLA4 SNP rs231775 (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54–0.82; P = 9.3 × 10−5) after adjustment for age, study site, population stratification, stage, grade, and oral contraceptive use. The rs231775 allele associated with improved survival in our study also results in an amino acid change in CTLA4 and previously has been reported to be associated with autoimmune conditions. Thus, we found evidence that SNPs in genes related to Tregs seem to play a role in ovarian cancer survival, particularly in patients with clear cell and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res; 2(4); 332–40. ©2014 AACR.

Supplementary Methods

IDFS by HER2 IHC score at definitive surgery (derived from samples used for eligibility and exploratory purposes). IDFS, invasive disease-free survival; IHC, immunohistochemistry; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine.

Prognostic value for IDFS by treatment arm of biomarker gene expression levels (>median vs. ≤median and continuous) in post-NAT surgical RNA-evaluable tissue samples. Analysis is adjusted for tumor content. One sample could not be included because there was insufficient information on tumor content.

Comparison of baseline patient and disease characteristics assessed at eligibility in the ITT population versus in those with mRNA data derived from pre-NAT or post-NAT surgical samples (RNA-evaluable population). Note: the pre-NAT and post-NAT samples are not paired.

Comparison of IDFS outcomes in the ITT population compared to the (A) RNA-evaluable population (REP) (including pre- and post-NAT surgical samples) and in patients with (B) pre-NAT REP samples (left) or post-NAT surgical REP samples (right). HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDFS, invasive disease-free survival; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ITT, intent-to-treat; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine.

Supplementary Figures S1-S13

Purpose:Advanced-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) has poor chemotherapy response and prognosis and lacks biomarkers to aid stage I adjuvant treatment. Differentiating primary MOC from gastrointestinal (GI) metastases to the ovary is also challenging due to phenotypic similarities. Clinicopathologic and gene-expression data were analyzed to identify prognostic and diagnostic features.Experimental Design:Discovery analyses selected 19 genes with prognostic/diagnostic potential. Validation was performed through the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and GI cancer biobanks comprising 604 patients with MOC (n = 333), mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (MBOT, n = 151), and upper GI (n = 65) and lower GI tumors (n = 55).Results:Infiltrative pattern of invasion was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) within 2 years from diagnosis, compared with expansile pattern in stage I MOC [hazard ratio (HR), 2.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–7.41, P = 0.042]. Increased expression of THBS2 and TAGLN was associated with shorter OS in MOC patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.51, P = 0.016) and (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.45, P = 0.043), respectively. ERBB2 (HER2) amplification or high mRNA expression was evident in 64 of 243 (26%) of MOCs, but only 8 of 243 (3%) were also infiltrative (4/39, 10%) or stage III/IV (4/31, 13%).Conclusions:An infiltrative growth pattern infers poor prognosis within 2 years from diagnosis and may help select stage I patients for adjuvant therapy. High expression of THBS2 and TAGLN in MOC confers an adverse prognosis and is upregulated in the infiltrative subtype, which warrants further investigation. Anti-HER2 therapy should be investigated in a subset of patients. MOC samples clustered with upper GI, yet markers to differentiate these entities remain elusive, suggesting similar underlying biology and shared treatment strategies.

Purpose:In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT.Materials and Methods:Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined.Results:T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32–3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56–1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44–1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59–1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples.Conclusions:T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.

Comparison of HER2 expression heterogeneity in paired pre-NAT (i.e., before surgery) and post-NAT surgical samples. Patients were categorized according to whether HER2 staining was focal (

Supplementary Tables S1-S11

Association results between minor alleles of 467 variants incorportated in cross tissue gene expression prediction model for the gene of CRHR1.

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations.Methods: We selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls).Results: Gene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05). These results were replicated (P < 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network.Conclusion: We identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development.Impact: Network analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(10); 1574–84. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose:Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used for comprehensive investigation of molecular events in breast cancer. We evaluated the relevance of genomic alterations for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the GeparSepto trial.Experimental Design:Eight hundred fifty-one pretherapeutic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) core biopsies from GeparSepto study were sequenced. The panel included 16 genes for mutational (AKT1, BRAF, CDH1, EGFR, ERBB2, ESR1, FBXW7, FGFR2, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, SF3B1, TP53, HNF1A, PIK3CA, and PTEN) and 8 genes for copy-number alteration analysis (CCND1, ERBB2, FGFR1, PAK1, PIK3CA, TOP2A, TP53, and ZNF703).Results:The most common genomic alterations were mutations of TP53 (38.4%) and PIK3CA (21.5%), and 8 different amplifications (TOP2A 34.9%; ERBB2 30.6%; ZNF703 30.1%; TP53 21.9%; PIK3CA 24.1%; CCND1 17.7%; PAK1 14.9%; FGFR 12.6%). All other alterations had a prevalence of less than 5%. The genetic heterogeneity in different breast cancer subtypes [lum/HER2neg vs. HER2pos vs. triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)] was significantly linked to differences in NACT response. A significantly reduced pathologic complete response rate was observed in PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer [PIK3CAmut: 23.0% vs. wild-type (wt) 38.8%, P < 0.0001] in particular in the HER2pos subcohort [multivariate OR = 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24–0.79), P = 0.006]. An increased response to nab-paclitaxel was observed only in PIK3CAwt breast cancer, with univariate significance for the complete cohort (P = 0.009) and the TNBC (P = 0.013) and multivariate significance in the HER2pos subcohort (test for interaction P = 0.0074).Conclusions:High genetic heterogeneity was observed in different breast cancer subtypes. Our study shows that FFPE-based NGS can be used to identify markers of therapy resistance in clinical study cohorts. PIK3CA mutations could be a major mediator of therapy resistance in breast cancer.

Purpose:To identify molecular predictors of grade 3/4 neutropenic or leukopenic events (NLE) after chemotherapy using a genome-wide association study (GWAS).Experimental Design:A GWAS was performed on patients in the phase III chemotherapy study SUCCESS-A (n = 3,322). Genotyping was done using the Illumina HumanOmniExpress-12v1 array. Findings were functionally validated with cell culture models and the genotypes and gene expression of possible causative genes were correlated with clinical treatment response and prognostic outcomes.Results:One locus on chromosome 16 (rs4784750; NLRC5; P = 1.56E-8) and another locus on chromosome 13 (rs16972207; TNFSF13B; P = 3.42E-8) were identified at a genome-wide significance level. Functional validation revealed that expression of these two genes is altered by genotype-dependent and chemotherapy-dependent activity of two transcription factors. Genotypes also showed an association with disease-free survival in patients with an NLE.Conclusions:Two loci in NLRC5 and TNFSF13B are associated with NLEs. The involvement of the MHC I regulator NLRC5 implies the possible involvement of immuno-oncological pathways.

PDF file, 70K, Availability of information on tumor morphology and receptor status for Europeans, by each included BCAC study.

Supplementary Data from CYP2D6 Polymorphisms as Predictors of Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen: Expanded Polymorphism Coverage Improves Risk Stratification