Search

The molecular dynamics with electronic friction (MDEF) approach can accurately describe nonadiabatic effects at metal surfaces in the weakly nonadiabatic limit. That being said, the MDEF approach treats nuclear motion classically such that the nuclear quantum effects are completely missing in the approach. To address this limitation, we combine Electronic Friction with Ring Polymer Molecular Dynamics (EF-RPMD). In particular, we apply the averaged electronic friction from the metal surface to the centroid mode of the ring polymer. We benchmark our approach against quantum dynamics to show that EF-RPMD can accurately capture zero-point energy as well as transition dynamics. In addition, we show that EF-RPMD can correctly predict the electronic transfer rate near metal surfaces in the tunneling limit as well as the barrier crossing limit. We expect that our approach will be very useful to study nonadiabatic dynamics near metal surfaces when nuclear quantum effects become essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Endometrial cancer is stepping into the era of precision therapy. Genomic test is recommended for newly diagnostic patients. However, outpatients displayed more complex characteristics. Here, we elucidated the clinical characteristics and genomic profiling of outpatients with endometrial cancer at our institution. Methods: Between 2018 and 2023, 68 endometrial cancer received genomic tests at outpatient department of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Data, including age, pathological histology, FIGO stage and treatment strategy were collected. Germline mutations, molecular subtypes and other somatic mutations were also summarized. Results: Overall, 72.1% (49/68) of patients receive genomic tests at primary diagnosis, while 27.9% (19/68) of patients received tests at recurrence. Nine patients had deleterious germline mutations, including BRCA1(2), MLH1(1), MSH2(2, including one with co-mutation of RAD50), MSH6(2), FANCA(1), MUTYH(1). Molecular subtypes were recognized among 62 patients, as POLE super-mutation(4, 6.5%), MSI-H(7, 11.3%), CN-Low(36, 58.1%) and CN-High(15, 24.2%). Ten patients received anti-PD1 monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy, with the duration of disease control of 1 to 35 months. The ORR rate was 30%, and six patients had stable disease. The median (range) follow-up time was 18(2–160) months. 23(33.8%) relapses were recorded, and CN-High subtype displayed worst PFS compared with other subtypes (P < 0.01). 6 deaths were reported including 2(5.6%) of CN-Low and 4(26.7%) of CN-High. Conclusion: Outpatients department gathered a considerable proportion of recurrent patients with complex genomic features. Patients with worse prognosis could be well studied, and anti-PD1 therapy was a promising salvage therapy in the real world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We explored Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) expression in special types of breast carcinoma, and analyzed the correlation between TRPS1 and androgen receptor (AR) expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: TRPS1 expression was analyzed in 801 patients with special types of breast carcinoma. A total of 969 TNBC were used to analyze the correlation between the expression of TRPS1 and AR. TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1975 cases of breast cancer with different molecular types. Results: A total of 801 special types of breast cancers were stained with TRPS1.TRPS1 was positive in 100% (63/63) of mucinous carcinoma, 100% (7/7) adenoid cystic carcinomas (4 classic adenoid cystic carcinomas and 3 solid-basaloid adenoid cystic carcinomas), 100% (4/4) tubular carcinomas, 100% (2/2) secretory carcinomas, and 99.59% (243/244) invasive lobular carcinomas, 99.26% (267/269) invasive micropapillary carcinomas, 97.44% (38/39) ER-positive neuroendocrine tumors, 94.44% (34/36) metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs), 63.73% (65/102) apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 was negative in all triple-negative neuroendocrine carcinomas (0/7).TRPS1 was positive in 92.86% (26/28) of metastatic special types of breast cancer. TRPS1 and AR expression were analyzed in 969 cases of TNBC. 90.40% were positive for TRPS1, and 42.41% were positive for AR. A significant inverse correlation between TRPS1 and AR expression was shown in TNBC (p <.001). TRPS1 showed a higher positive rate (93.13%) in TNBC compared to GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) and forkhead box transcription Factor C 1 (FOXC1). Conclusions: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for most special types of breast carcinoma. TRPS1 was positive in 63.73% of apocrine carcinomas. TRPS1 and AR expression was inversely correlated in TNBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]