Search

The article presents the status of key cases granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court. Topics discussed include Altitude Express v. Zarda related to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits sex discrimination to prevents employers from firing workers because of their sexual orientation, Chiafolo v. Washington related to how presidential electors vote in the Electoral College violate the Constitution and Kahler v. Kansas to abolish the insanity defense for criminal trials.

The article reports that Louisiana enacted the Unsafe Abortion Protection Act (Act 620) requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a hospital where they perform abortions. It discusses the Louisiana district court case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. It presents the views of House Representative Katrina Jackson on performing abortions in a safe environment by offering women the optimal protection and care of their bodies.

The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme court case related to the abortion, U.S. Presidential Tax Returns and Immigration. It discusses the court case, "June Medical Services v. Gee" related to the abortion. It mentions the court case, "Mathena v. Malvo" regarding the capital punishment, where Lee Boyd Malvo convicted of committing homicides.

The article presents U.S. Supreme Court case, "James K. Kahler v. Kansas." where Kansas, U.S. charged petitioner James Kahler with capital murder after he shot and killed four family members. It discusses that, prior to trial, Kahler argued that Kansas's insanity defense violates due process because it permits the State to convict a defendant whose mental illness prevented him from distinguishing right from wrong, along with how Kansas Supreme Court abolished the insanity defense.

The article offers information on the construction of U.S. Supreme Court towards the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment which prohibiting government from making any law "respecting establishment of religion" and also highlights the rise of direct aid challenges in the context of funding or material assistance to programs.

The article highlights the Montana Department of Revenue holding of administering the Tax Credit Program which provides a taxpayer a dollar for dollar tax credit based on the taxpayer's donation to a student scholarship organization (SSO). It mentions about the reference of First Amendment's religion clauses, the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.

The article offers the ruling of United States Supreme Court in the case Kendra Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue in which focuses parents treated no differently than parents of children who are going to secular private schools; and also highlights Montana's enacting and applying a state constitutional provision that keeps its own state legislature out of the business of funding of religious schools.

The article presents the court case 'New York State Rifle & Pistol Association et. al. v. City of New York et al.' in which the U.S. Supreme Court heard the oral arguments of counsels Paul D. Clement and Richard P. Dearing. Topics include the city's restriction on firearms transport, the reasons why the restriction is unconstitutional based on U.S. history, tradition, and text, as well as the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment to the rights to keep and bear arms.

The article presents the court case 'New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York,' in which the Second Circuit ruled that New York City's handgun licensing law is constitutional. Also cited are the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment, an individual's right to bear and keep arms, and the collective rights of states to maintain a militia.

An excerpt is presented from the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments for the case June Medical Services et al. v. Stephen Russo.

The article presents U.S. Supreme Court case, "James K. Kahler v. Kansas." where Kansas, U.S. charged petitioner James Kahler with capital murder after he shot and killed four family members. It discusses that, prior to trial, Kahler argued that Kansas's insanity defense violates due process because it permits the State to convict a defendant whose mental illness prevented him from distinguishing right from wrong.

The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the law by distinguishing a 2016 Supreme Court decision for the case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. Topics discussed include Texas law which imposed an undue burden on a woman's ability to obtain an abortion, the Supreme Court in the case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey and an abortion regulation imposes on abortion access together with the health benefits.

The article offers information on the court cases related to the insanity defense. It discusses the court case of the Daniel M'Naghten, Scottish woodturner who assassinated English civil servant Edward Drummond while suffering from paranoid delusions. It discusses the problems of interpretation exist with the M'Naghten Rule (insanity defense), along with intentional crimes defined by the mens rea (state of mind).

An introduction is presented in which the author discusses issues in gun control in the U.S., a court case filed by New York City residents due to alleged violations of their constitutional rights to bear and keep arms, and the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

The article discusses gun rights in the U.S. and how the courts tackle cases about the issue. Also cited are the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment, the collective rights of states to maintain militias, the right of citizens to bear and keep arms, as well as the court cases 'McDonald v. City of Chicago' and 'District of Columbia v. Heller.'