62 results on '"*ACTIONS & defenses (Law)"'
Search Results
2. A FACE ONLY AN ATTORNEY COULD LOVE: MADISON SQUARE GARDEN'S USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY TO BAN LAWYERS WITH PENDING LITIGATION.
- Author
-
CONKLIN, MICHAEL and ELZWEIG, BRIAN
- Subjects
- *
HUMAN facial recognition software , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *LAW firms , *LEX talionis , *BIOMETRIC identification - Published
- 2024
3. Legal Struggles: A Social Theory Perspective on Strategic Litigation and Legal Mobilisation.
- Author
-
Buckel, Sonja, Pichl, Maximilian, and Vestena, Carolina A.
- Subjects
- *
SOCIAL theory , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *SOCIAL movements , *NONGOVERNMENTAL organizations , *SOCIAL change - Abstract
Social movements, NGOs and other political actors often mobilise the law for social change. Strategic litigation and collective legal mobilisation can be key instruments to face current political challenges like the climate crisis, human rights violations against refugees or the exploitation of workers along global supply chains. Although these struggles are framed by a societal context and have impacts on the political and juridical fields, the literature about legal mobilisation still does not decidedly engage with a social-theory-based perspective on such struggles. By developing the concept of legal struggles, the article proposes a conceptual framework to analyse both the ambivalence and the emancipatory potential of progressive struggles in the juridical field. Critical Theory, Materialist Theory and the Theory of Social Fields by Pierre Bourdieu are combined to investigate the specific form of collective legal struggles carried out in this arena. We examine repertoires and strategies of collective actors as well as the emancipatory potential of these mobilisation strategies. Our conclusions point to the structural distinctions and selectivities which define the juridical field in capitalist societies and also the conditions of possibility of political struggles using the law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. PRO SE LITIGANTS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: HOW DO THEY FARE?
- Author
-
PERSAUD, KYLE
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL self-representation , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PARTIES to actions - Abstract
The article examines the success of pro se representation in U.S. Supreme Court cases. It analyzes relevant cases statistically and determines the percentage of pro se litigants who were successful and the percentage of pro se litigants who were attorneys before comparing the results for pro se attorneys and pro se non-attorneys. It explores the Supreme Court's shifting attitude toward non-lawyers who argue in the Court.
- Published
- 2024
5. Resistance Proceduralism: A Prologue to Theorizing Procedural Subordination.
- Author
-
Pedro, Portia
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL procedure , *SLAVERY , *LAWYERS , *LEGAL self-representation , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
Several legal scholars have discussed the role of slavery within their own family histories and a growing number of scholars are exploring the successes and strategies of lawyers and Black litigants in freedom suits and other litigation in the United States antebellum South. I build on these literatures with a focus on procedure. In this Article, I analyze procedures involved in a few of my ancestral and personal experiences. Some of the experiences with process involved litigation to be free from slavery while other experiences did not explicitly involve any law. But they all involved process. Engaging in this practice--marshaling procedure to increase justice for marginalized groups and to decrease procedural subordination and white supremacy--is a form of what I am calling resistance proceduralism. I draw from engagement with procedures, such as requirements to file a lawsuit or for bonds and securities, in my ancestors' freedom suits--lawsuits fighting for their freedom from slavery--to query whether some marginalized litigants, and even people who were enslaved at the time, may have engaged in resistance proceduralism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
6. THE PROBLEM OF EXTRAVAGANT INFERENCES.
- Author
-
Sunstein, Cass R.
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *JUDGES , *EXECUTIVE power - Abstract
Judges and lawyers sometimes act as if a constitutional or statutory term must, as a matter of semantics, be understood to have a particular meaning, when it could easily be understood to have another meaning, or several other meanings. When judges and lawyers act as if a legal term has a unique semantic meaning, even though it does not, they should be seen to be drawing extravagant inferences. Some constitutional provisions are treated this way; consider the idea that the vesting of executive power in a President of the United States necessarily includes the power to remove, at will, a very wide range of people who are involved in the execution of the laws. Some statutory provisions are also treated this way; consider the idea that the term "air pollutant" necessarily includes greenhouse gases. Those who draw extravagant inferences might be engaged in a form of motivated reasoning; their (unarticulated) values and preferences might be responsible for the particular inferences they draw. Alternatively, they might be engaged in an unacknowledged form of Dworkinian reasoning, in which they are attempting to make the best constructive sense out of a legal term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
7. COUNTING TO FOUR: THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF WISCONSIN'S FRACTURED SUPREME COURT.
- Author
-
MANDELL, JEFFREY A. and SCHNEIDER, DANIEL J.
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *LAW reform , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
Over the past decade, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has issued "fractured" opinions--decisions without majority support for any one legal rationale supporting the outcome--at an alarming clip. These opinions have confounded legal analysts, attorneys, and government officials due to their lack of majority reasoning, but also due to their length and the court's particular procedures for assigning, drafting, and labelling opinions. This has become especially problematic where the court has issued fractured opinions in areas core to the basic functioning of state and local government, leaving the state without clear precedential guidance on what the law is. Yet, virtually no one has analyzed the deeper issues animating this predicament: how fractured opinions in Wisconsin have been handled in the past, what norms surround those choices, and why this problem has become so pronounced. This Article details the history of fractured opinions at the Wisconsin Supreme Court, from the state's founding to the present, with a particular focus on the past twenty years and the development of the court's current crisis. With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court's approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), a series of potential reforms are proposed. In particular, this Article suggests that the Wisconsin Supreme Court clearly define and explain what this Article dubs "the Rationale Rule," that is, the court-adopted principle that a "majority of the participating judges must have agreed on a particular point" of law for precedent to form on that point. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
8. Territoriality and Status in Human Rights Litigation: The Case of Israel/Palestine.
- Author
-
Ballas, Irit
- Subjects
- *
HUMAN rights , *CITIZENSHIP , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *HUMAN territoriality - Abstract
Both territoriality and political status serve as parameters for determining the extent of a state's obligation to uphold human rights. Scholars have shown that different actors may manipulate the scope of these parameters to serve their particular purposes. Based on interviews with lawyers from Israeli human rights organizations, this article shows how they also manipulate the relationships between these parameters. When representing different clients, lawyers from Israeli human rights organizations accentuate one parameter over the other, demand congruity between them, or reject both. The findings highlight how the movable intersections between territoriality and political status facilitate a multitude of discursive strategies from which lawyers can pick and choose, to address political predicaments they face in their praxis. Furthermore, by judiciously applying these strategies, lawyers are able to mobilize the indeterminate relationship between political status and territoriality to destabilize what they perceive to be the unjust boundaries promoted by the state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Searching for the Ideal Expert Witness: Key Strategies for Children's Lawyers.
- Author
-
Kelly, Diann
- Subjects
- *
EXPERT evidence , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *WITNESS credibility , *REPUTATION (Law) - Abstract
The article emphasizes the importance of expert witnesses in court cases involving children, underscoring their role in providing essential structure and credibility to presented evidence. It advises attorneys to seek experts with extensive experience, academic contributions, and a strong reputation within their field. The process involves identifying specific case needs, researching potential candidates and ensuring the expert can effectively educate the court while remaining objective.
- Published
- 2024
10. Taking the Initiative: Proactive Litigation Strategies in Intellectual Property Disputes.
- Author
-
LeRoy, John and Stasa, Benjamin C.
- Subjects
- *
INTELLECTUAL property , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PATENTABILITY , *DECLARATORY judgments , *LAWYERS , *TRADE secrets - Abstract
This article discusses proactive litigation strategies in intellectual property disputes. It explains that when an entity or individual believes their IP rights have been infringed upon, the typical first step is to send a demand or cease-and-desist letter. However, in some cases, the accused party may opt for a proactive litigation strategy. This strategy allows them to frame the legal issues proactively, evaluate the most appropriate venue for the dispute, and potentially mitigate the scope of the dispute. The article explores the components of a proactive litigation strategy, including filing for a declaratory judgment, initiating an Inter Partes Review (IPR), and conducting a Post Grant Review (PGR). It also highlights the potential risks and challenges associated with proactive litigation and emphasizes the importance of consulting with experienced IP counsel. The article concludes by stating that while being proactive can help resolve uncertainties and secure a favorable legal position, it is crucial to approach these strategies with caution, knowledge, and thorough planning. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2024
11. Human rights and climate wrongs: Mapping the landscape of rights‐based climate litigation.
- Author
-
Iyengar, Shalini
- Subjects
- *
HUMAN rights , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *SOCIAL ecology , *CLIMATOLOGY , *LAWYERS - Abstract
Human rights‐based climate litigation cases have become increasingly prominent over the past decade. While absolute numbers of these cases are still relatively low, they have attracted significant praise and scrutiny, both from the standpoint of the media and the academy. However, while there is a large body of scholarly literature on these rights‐based climate cases, relatively little qualitative research has focused on the actors bringing these claims before the court. This article uses qualitative socio‐legal research methods to examine how lawyers and activists in the climate litigation space think about these cases, their strategies and their reasons for using human rights‐based arguments to address the climate crisis. By foregrounding these actors and their voices, this article tells the story of the human rights‐based climate litigation movement and how it came together. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Self(ie) mapping the relevance of professional daily decision-making process by lawyers.
- Author
-
Angioletti, Laura, Greco, Simone, and Balconi, Michela
- Subjects
- *
SELF , *LAWYERS , *SCHEDULING , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *DECISION making - Abstract
This study investigates the activities requiring the most important decisions for lawyers during a typical professional day. The sample was composed of ten lawyers and ten non-legal professionals to compare different working groups. Daily journals (DDs) were used to gather behavioral information about the type of activities that require varying levels of relevance in terms of decision making and the time of day when professionals make these important decisions. Qualitative findings suggested decisions are mainly taken in relation to leisure, work and planning activities. For both groups, more relevant decisions were taken in the morning compared to afternoon and evening, and more in relation to work compared with leisure activities. Interestingly, the group of lawyers reported a greater relevance for decisions related to planning activities compared to work activities. At the practical level, this evidence could guide the organization of work activities made by the institutions, e.g. recommending that tasks requiring decision making are placed in strategic time slots. For lawyers, the moment in which they plan their activities consists in the phase in which the fate of their work is really played: meeting with counterparts, act/opinion/warning drafting, legal advice, and consulting are all legal actions that require important decisions for them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Multidistrict Litigation and the Field of Dreams.
- Author
-
Rave, D. Theodore
- Subjects
- *
MULTIDISTRICT litigation , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *DEFENDANTS ,FEDERAL Rules of Evidence (U.S.) - Abstract
This Article analyzes the so-called Field of Dreams problem in multidistrict litigation (MDL). Once an MDL is up and running, the story goes, plaintiffs' lawyers flood the proceeding with meritless claims in the hopes that they will be swept into a global settlement before anyone ever looks closely at them. Critics have called this the most pressing problem with MDLs today and lobbied both Congress and the Federal Rules Committee for MDL-specific rules to address it. This Article analyzes the empirical and normative dimensions of the MDL Field of Dreams. While the empirical evidence behind existing complaints about meritless claims in MDL is exceedingly thin, the economic intuition behind the phenomenon is quite plausible: if you reduce the cost of litigation, as MDL does, more claims with lower expected values will enter the system. Assuming, then, that some significant portion of those new claims are meritless, this Article asks, what, exactly, is wrong with that? It examines several potential problems an influx of meritless claims could create from both the defendants' and plaintiffs' perspectives. While some of these concerns are serious, others are overblown. And the types of claims that garner the most criticism-those filed by people who have not been exposed or injured-are actually the least problematic. Many of the real problems that the Field of Dreams creates can be addressed through private ordering and case management techniques that are within the existing powers of the MDL judge and do not require a radical overhaul of MDL procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
14. Diversity and Complexity in MDL Leadership: A Status Report from Case Management Orders.
- Author
-
Noll, David L. and Zimmerman, Adam S.
- Subjects
- *
MULTIDISTRICT litigation , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LEADERSHIP , *JUDGES , *LAWYERS - Abstract
In multidistrict litigation, as elsewhere, personnel is policy. As MDL has become a major site for aggregate litigation, commentators have raised concerns that large-scale products liability cases are unduly influenced by a small cadre of elite lawyers whom courts repeatedly appointed to serve in the most powerful MDL leadership roles. Repeated appointments of these "repeat players," commentators worry, facilitate self-dealing, suppress dissent, and aggravate conflicts of interest seen in other areas of aggregate litigation. These concerns about MDL overlap with broader concerns across the bench and bar about the degree to which white people and men dominate important leadership posts, to the exclusion of younger attorneys, women, LGBTQ+ people, and attorneys of color. In response to these concerns, prominent authorities urged MDL courts to adopt a number of reforms. They recommended that judges appoint leaders through open, competitive processes; create additional leadership posts and committees; and appoint leaders for limited terms in order to create more opportunities for new attorneys to participate in leadership. But, outside of a handful of highly publicized cases, we have little empirical evidence of whether MDL leadership appointments changed in the ways that reformers proposed. This Article-part of a larger, ongoing study of the nature and functions of MDL leaders and the MDL model of aggregate litigation begins to fill that gap. Drawing on a dataset of thousands of filings and orders that were entered in sixty-eight products liability MDLs pending in June 2019, we report data on the size, composition, and appointment process for MDL leadership slates, and changes in the makeup of leadership slates in the eighteen-year period our dataset covers. Our data tentatively suggest that reformers' calls for larger, complex leadership slates and frequent competitive leadership appointment processes went unheeded. Examining trends in the size and structure of MDL leadership slates in products liability MDLs, we find little evidence that courts implemented the structural changes that the reformers suggested. Yet, while leadership appointment practices and the complexity of MDL leadership slates do not appear to have changed during the period we studied, we find intriguing changes in who is being appointed to leadership posts. Slightly less than a quarter of leadership appointments in our data went to female attorneys, suggestive of only a trivial increase in women's representation on leadership slates compared to earlier studies. But the majority of leadership appointments also did not go to super-elite repeat player attorneys. And, comparing our findings with earlier work that examined MDLs pending in 2013, we find substantial movement in the attorneys and firms whom MDL courts appointed most frequently to leadership posts. These findings complicate received wisdom about MDL leadership posts. While we document considerable continuity in who is being appointed to MDL leadership posts and how, our data are suggestive of a deep bench of potential future MDL leaders for judges to choose from, as well as the opportunity for even further change in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
15. The Suspect Restitutionary Basis for Common Benefit Fee Awards in Multi-District Litigations.
- Author
-
Silver, Charles
- Subjects
- *
ADMINISTRATIVE fees , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PLAINTIFFS , *LAWYERS , *JUDGES - Abstract
The article examine the practice of forced fee transfers in Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) and whether the law of restitution and unjust enrichment supports such fee awards. It argues that MDL procedures often violate the law and judges regulate fees more aggressively in MDLs than in other types of litigation. It further highlights that judges in MDLs has the authority to override the contractual entitlements of individually retained plaintiffs attorneys (IRPAs).
- Published
- 2023
16. Where' s the Insurance in Mass Tort Litigation?
- Author
-
Baker, Tom
- Subjects
- *
MASS torts , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CORPORATE governance , *DEFENDANTS , *LAWYERS - Abstract
Drawing on qualitative empirical research, this Article reports and explains the unusual role of insurance in mass tort litigation. In contrast to ordinary tort, corporate governance, and securities litigation: (1) mass tort plaintiff lawyers do not build their litigation and settlement strategy around defendants' liability insurance. except in the insolvency or near-insolvency context; (2) mass tort defendants typically retain control over their defense, even when they recover under insurance policies that assign the insurer control over their defense; (3) mass tort defendants typically use their own funds to settle claims, obtaining indemnification from their liability insurers. if any, later; and (4) many mass tort plaintiff law firms rely on non-recourse litigation funding that resembles the earliest forms of commercial insurance-bottomry and respondentia-and there is an emerging insurance market that reduces the cost of this funding and may one day supplant it. In addition to providing a new understanding of the role of insurance in mass tort litigation, this research provides empirical support for two of the conceptual insights in Kenneth Abraham's The Liability Century : (1) the mismatch between product liability and product liability insurance that emerged near the end of the twentieth century and (2) the increasingly insurance-like function of tort law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
17. Steering into the Skid: Regaining Legitimacy in Our Legal System.
- Author
-
LUND, JOHN and HIMONAS, DENO
- Subjects
- *
JUSTICE administration , *ILLEGITIMACY , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
The article discusses the need for the U.S. legal system to be accessible, affordable, and responsive to the needs of the general public. It argues that the legitimacy of the legal system hinges on the people's acceptance of it, and for that acceptance to continue, the legal system must work for the majority. It highlights the current shortcomings of the legal system, particularly the fact that many people handle legal problems without lawyers due to cost or lack of trust.
- Published
- 2023
18. Distributive Precedent and the Pro Se Crisis.
- Author
-
Tahk, Susannah Camic
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *JUSTICE administration , *CONSUMER protection , *LABOR laws , *LAWYERS - Abstract
A crisis in pro se litigation is currently facing the U.S. legal system. This crisis appears in areas of law ranging from family law to consumer protection law to employment law to the rights of people currently experiencing incarceration. In these and other areas, litigants without lawyers almost invariably lose due to enormous legal and sociolegal impediments. Most scholars and other legal observers view this situation as virtually hopeless, but this Article turns in a novel direction by conducting an empirical study of those rare cases where pro se litigants succeed. The study involved assembling two original hand-coded datasets of these cases in nine states during a period in 2020. The first dataset consists of all 568 cases where pro se litigants succeeded, and the second consists of the 619 precedents that pro se litigants cited favorably in these cases. Analysis of these datasets shows that the substantial majority of pro se successes relied on a body of "distributive precedents," established by cases in which both original parties had lawyers. This Article identifies several of the key legal and social features of the distributive precedents, including their areas of law, geographical origins, and procedural and substantive characteristics. Based on these research findings, the Article outlines policy interventions into the pro se crisis, identifying several mechanisms for expanding the supply of distributive precedents and for increasing access to them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
19. Neuropsychological Aspects of Brain Injury Litigation: A Medicolegal Handbook for Lawyers and Clinicians: Edited by Phil S Moore, Shereen Brifcani and Andrew Worthington Routledge, 2021, 254 pp., £39.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780367616274, 0367616270.
- Author
-
Crowe, Simon F.
- Subjects
- *
POSTCONCUSSION syndrome , *BRAIN injuries , *MEDICAL personnel , *DECISION making in law , *LAWYERS , *CLINICAL neuropsychology , *NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL rehabilitation , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
The book is structured in three parts: (1) the state of the client "but for" the brain injury, focussing on the premorbid state of the client preceding the injury; (2) the current condition of the client, focusing on issues including methodology, reliability, validity, dose-response relationships, the frontal paradox, and capacity, financial and litigation-related decision-making in brain injured clients; and (3) the final section of the book which focuses on loss, disability and impact, including aspects relevant to the determination of the quantum both at a theoretical and practical level and culminating in a synthesis of all of the material presented throughout the book into a contemporary framework for medicolegal formulation. Neuropsychological Aspects of Brain Injury Litigation: A Medicolegal Handbook for Lawyers and Clinicians: Edited by Phil S Moore, Shereen Brifcani and Andrew Worthington Routledge, 2021, 254 pp., £39.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780367616274, 0367616270 Charles and Johnson's introductory chapter on legal principles and litigation surveys the legal context for the dispute and explores how the neuropsychological evidence fits within this. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Storytelling: The Art of the Advocate.
- Author
-
RUSHING, DON G.
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL storytelling , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *KNOWLEDGE transfer , *CLIENTS - Abstract
The article focuses on the importance of storytelling in the field of litigation. It emphasizes that crafting a compelling story and effectively presenting it is crucial for advocates to persuade listeners to prefer their client's version of events over that of the opponent. It further highlights that storytelling is deeply rooted in human history and has been used to transmit knowledge, culture, and beliefs across generations.
- Published
- 2023
21. RECENT LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS OF INTEREST TO ENERGY LAWYERS.
- Author
-
WOOD, DAVID, KHAN, PARVEZ, BRUNI, GINO, and CAMPBELL, TAYLOR
- Subjects
- *
ENERGY policy , *JUDICIAL process , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *ENERGY industries , *LAWYERS - Abstract
This article provides an overview of recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to Canadian energy lawyers from April 2021 to March 2022. It includes discussions of recent regulatory decisions and related judicial decisions, as well as changes to regulatory and legislative regimes impacting energy law. This article also discusses and comments on a number of ongoing regulatory and legislative developments to watch in the coming year. Topics discussed include the opportunities and challenges posed by decarbonization efforts, Aboriginal law, standard of review, and other natural resource and power developments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. "Guilty of Publishing Only": Jury Nullification as a Legal Defense in the Eighteenth Century.
- Author
-
Otis, Andrew
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *EIGHTEENTH century , *LEGAL reasoning , *LIBEL & slander lawsuits , *FREEDOM of the press - Abstract
Previous research is largely mute about the strategies that printers and their legal counsels used to defend state libel lawsuits. Analysis of the legal arguments employed in sixty-eight state libel jury trials in anglophone courts from 1699 to 1792 identifies which of them were most associated with acquittal. Jury-nullification arguments, based on freedom of the press, which encouraged jurors to disregard judges' directives and to contravene the law, had a higher rate of success than did approaches based on the standard legal precedents of the period. These findings suggest that the public was sympathetic with a broad interpretation of press freedom at a time when many Crown judges attempted to limit it exclusively to prior restraint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Leveled odds? Attorney capability, team litigation, and outcomes in administrative patent cases.
- Author
-
Miller, Banks and Curry, Brett
- Subjects
- *
PATENT suits , *ATTORNEY & client , *LAWYERS , *PATENT offices , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PATENTS , *ATTORNEY-client privilege - Abstract
We examine the impact of legal representation in an administrative setting. Focusing on adversarial proceedings within the United States Patent and Trademark Office and employing new data on patent litigation, we investigate patent rights—a legal area dominated by specialized, upper‐hemisphere litigation teams that generally represent parties with ample resources. Even in an environment with substantial parity in representational capability, we find that litigation team quality matters. Perceived firm quality and litigation team size both enhance the likelihood of victory; these findings are robust under a number of different approaches used to account for the ability of attorneys to select their clients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Attorney Fees for Enforcing Indemnification Rights in Litigation under Delaware Law.
- Author
-
Rawnsley, Jason J.
- Subjects
- *
INDEMNIFICATION , *LAWYERS , *LAWYERS' fees , *CONTRACTS , *ADMINISTRATIVE fees , *LEGAL costs , *TUITION , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
Parties entering into transactions often provide for indemnification rights in their agreements. There was no provision for fee shifting elsewhere in the agreement, whereas in some previous decisions the court had denied recovery of attorney fees unde indemnification clause if the contract elsewhere included a prevailing-party clause. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
25. The Introduction.
- Author
-
Dent, Stephen P.
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL briefs , *FORENSIC orations , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CRITICAL & persuasive writing , *LAWYERS , *STATUTES - Abstract
The article offers tips to lawyers when writing a introduction of legal briefs that is persuasive to reduce a dispute and its resolution. These include getting down to brass tacks or giving rise to the dispute, giving the judge a list of reasons to win the case, triggering judicial fears of misconstruing a doctrine or statute, creating new duties, rules or defenses and reaching an unfair result, contrasting two views when arguing an opponent's position and considering memorable things.
- Published
- 2022
26. Legal Research: The Old Way Versus the New.
- Author
-
NEUBAUER, MARK A. and ROSEN, KATHRYN NEUBAUER
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL research , *LAWYERS , *COMPUTER research , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PRACTICE of law - Abstract
The article focuses on the difference between the new way and the old way to a legal research by lawyers. It mentions computerized research gives a long list of cases, and the difference between the new way and the old way is the old way requires lawyers to think. It also mentions using the old way, a researcher gets the full picture of the law, but picking the wrong key number can lead the researcher astray.
- Published
- 2022
27. RECENT ETHICS OPINIONS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
- Author
-
Meigs, Joseph
- Subjects
- *
CLIENTS , *LAWYERS , *METADATA , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Published
- 2022
28. Global Private Litigation Conference.
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *COMMERCIAL courts , *JUDGES , *LEGAL remedies , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *COFFEE plantations , *THIRD party litigation funding - Abstract
Each diner is responsible for his or her own check.
29. Liability Insurance and Contractual Aspects of Settlement.
- Author
-
Richmond, Douglas R.
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *CONTRACTS , *LIABILITY insurance , *GOVERNMENT policy , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
Most civil litigation settles. Many settlements are paid by liability insurers following the negotiation of settlement agreements by the parties’ lawyers. Settlement agreements are contracts, and their interpretation and enforcement are therefore governed by contract law principles. The essential elements of a contract are offer, acceptance, and consideration. In the liability insurance context as elsewhere, contract disputes connected to settlements typically center on either offer or acceptance. To be valid, a settlement offer must be capable of acceptance. The offer must be definite, and its material terms must be reasonably certain. When it comes to accepting a settlement offer, the “mirror image” rule applies in this context as it does in other contract formation scenarios. Under this rule, an attempted acceptance that does not mirror the settlement offer in material respects becomes a counteroffer. If the claimant declines the counteroffer, there is no settlement. This turn of events can be enormously consequential if the insured’s potential liability exceeds its policy limits and litigation ensues. The importance of achieving enforceable settlement agreements is difficult to overstate. The law and public policy strongly favor the settlement of disputes, and courts would be overwhelmed if most cases went to trial. This Article examines contractual aspects of settlement in the liability insurance context, concentrating on the elements of offer and acceptance. It additionally addresses insurers’ ability to reject settlement offers that are intended to facilitate later bad faith litigation without incurring extracontractual liability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
30. Advocacia colaborativa à brasileira: uma análise do PL n. 3813/2020.
- Author
-
Spengler, Fabiana Marion and Dornelles, Maini
- Subjects
- *
COLLABORATIVE lawyering , *LEGAL procedure , *RESEARCH methodology , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CONFLICT management - Abstract
The collaborative advocacy procedure originated in the United States with the lawyer Stuart Webb, who proposes that the parties be at the center of the conflict resolution and be assisted by professionals trained to do so. In Brazil, in 2020, Federal Deputy Ricardo Barros (PP) presented Bill n. 3813/2020, which aims to make it mandatory to carry out an extrajudicial session of self-composition of conflicts prior to the filing of a lawsuit. The scope of this work is to carry out an analysis of the aforementioned Bill (PL) to verify if it is a "Brazilian style" collaborative law institute. To carry out such analysis, a deductive approach method, starting from a general analysis to finally arrive at a specific and bibliographic research technique will be used. At the end, it will be proven that PL n. 3813/2020 is very similar to the collaborative law procedure, with some distinctions, that is why it can be considered a regulation of "Brazilian style" collaborative law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. INFLUENCE DIAGRAMS FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION.
- Author
-
Biedermann, Alex and Koehler, Jonathan J.
- Subjects
- *
PRACTICE of law , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *DECISION making in law , *GRAPHIC methods , *INFLUENCE - Abstract
Effective advocacy depends critically on the ability of attorneys to formulate, analyze, and compare rival courses of action. Whereas attorneys have been doing these things for centuries using little more than their gut instincts and experiences, sophisticated decision aids are now available that can improve the way attorneys assess the value of their cases and the strategic decisions that they make. These aids are proving valuable in medicine and business, but they have not impacted legal practice. This Article seeks to correct this oversight by showing how easy-to-use graphical models provide guidance for strategic legal decisions. Beginning with a paradigmatic example of a plaintiff who must choose between proceeding to trial or settling out of court, the Article shows how decision aids handle the uncertainties and interdependencies that arise when real-world considerations are introduced. In particular, the Article makes the case that influence diagrams, a relative newcomer in the field of decision analysis, should be the decision aid of choice in complex litigation matters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
32. MISREADING MENETTI: THE CASE DOES NOT HELP YOU AVOID LIABILITY FOR YOUR OWN FRAUD.
- Author
-
RICKS, VAL
- Subjects
- *
CORPORATE veil , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *PERSONAL liability - Abstract
Several decades ago, an incorrect legal idea surfaced in Texas jurisprudence: that business entity actors are immune from liability for fraud that they themselves commit, as if the entity is solely responsible. Though the Supreme Court of Texas has rejected that result several times, it keeps coming back. The most recent manifestation is as a construction of Texas's unique veil-piercing statute. Many lawyers have suggested that this view of the veil-piercing statute originated in Menetti v. Chavers, a San Antonio Court of Appeals case decided in 1998. Menetti has in fact played a prominent role in the movement to construe the statute this way. This Article shows that Menetti held no such view of the veil-piercing statute. Menetti has been misread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
33. "Revolution".
- Author
-
SHUNTICH, SAVANNA
- Subjects
- *
ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *LEGAL professions , *WORK environment , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
The article delves into the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on the legal profession, particularly focusing on the use of AI in the workplace and its potential impact on lawyers. It highlights recent legal cases that demonstrate the limitations of AI-generated content. It explores the possibilities of AI bringing efficiencies to legal practice and the potential for increased litigation related to AI.
- Published
- 2024
34. "COME TOGETHER".
- Author
-
SEIBEL, ANNE MARIE
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LEGAL professions , *LAWYERS , *JURY , *JUSTICE administration - Abstract
The article focuses on the pivotal role played by the Litigation Section in training, upholding, and advocating for a robust adversary system within the legal profession. It discusses the Section's commitment to enhance lawyer competency and ethical standards. It highlights the Section's efforts in advocating for judicial pay increases, preserving the jury system, and promoting diversity and accessibility within the legal profession.
- Published
- 2024
35. The Little Agency that Could: Louisiana's Mental Health Advocacy Service.
- Author
-
May-Ricks, Rebecca and Cook, Kathy Lynn
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL representation , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *MENTAL health services , *LAWYERS - Abstract
The article informs on Mental Health Advocacy Service (MHAS) which was established in the late 1970s as part of Louisiana's Division of Administration under the Office of the Governor. It mentions MHAS provides legal representation in virtually every civil commitment proceeding in Louisiana during the initial stages of confinement of persons with behavioral health issues as well as after the commitment has occurred in order to comply with a federal court order and state law.
- Published
- 2022
36. The Joint Defense Doctrine in Federal Contract Litigation.
- Author
-
DAVIDSON, MICHAEL J.
- Subjects
- *
PUBLIC contracts , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CONTRACTS , *LAWYERS , *SUBPOENA , *CIVIL procedure , *LAW firms - Abstract
[10] Also referred to as the common interest rule, the joint defense doctrine/privilege is treated as an extension of the attorney-client privilege, protecting the confidentiality of otherwise privileged communications between separate parties and their attorneys as part of a joint defense effort. Intervenor's attorney-an experienced partner in a government contracts law firm-offers to make the firm's resources available to assist the agency in defending the protest and suggests entering into a joint defense agreement. Further, the court rejected defendant's argument that the disclosure of the Statement of Material Facts automatically waived the privilege.[43] Earlier cases have also found the joint defense doctrine to apply. Although each defendant had his own attorney, the three lawyers were collaborating in a joint defense. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2022
37. MISMATCHED EXPECTATIONS: MEET-AND-CONFER SESSIONS.
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *JUDGES , *PRACTICE of law , *COURTS - Abstract
The article informs on meet-and-confer session. It mentions the lawyers expect nothing good will come of such sessions, they are sure, and mostly right, that opposing counsel will not genuinely try to compromise on anything. It also mentions nearly every court, nationwide, has imposed a meet-and-confer obligation on counsel as a de rigueur first step before any material disagreement with an adversary can be presented to the judge.
- Published
- 2022
38. MOTION SICKNESS.
- Author
-
ZOUHARY, JACK
- Subjects
- *
LEGAL motions , *LEGAL professions , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *LEGAL judgments - Abstract
The article focuses on the challenges and issues related to motion practice in the legal profession, particularly in the context of civil litigation. It discusses the prevalence of motion practice in legal proceedings, including procedural motions, discovery motions, motions to dismiss, and motions for summary judgment. It also highlights the importance of effective communication between attorneys and the court to reduce unnecessary motion practice and streamline the litigation process.
- Published
- 2023
39. USE AND ABUSE.
- Author
-
SHAPIRO, ROBERT E.
- Subjects
- *
CONTINGENT fees , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *ADVERTISING , *LEGAL ethics - Abstract
The article focuses on plaintiffs' lawyer out searching for contingency matters regardless of merit, there is a defendant's counsel who calculates how the fees billed to the client can be maximized through the use of large litigation teams. It mentions Supreme Court to set aside advertising restrictions in Bates v. Arizona and following developments in legal ethics would do well to keep apprised of New Jersey's considered approach.
- Published
- 2022
40. The Objectionable Client.
- Author
-
GREEN, BRUCE A. and SMALL, DANIEL
- Subjects
- *
PROFESSIONAL ethics , *POLITICAL parties , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LAWYERS , *SOCIAL responsibility - Abstract
The article focuses on Model Rules of Professional Conduct related to work on election litigation for a particular candidate or political party. It mentions abandoning them in favor of a litigation position that offends mean that are a bad person or lack integrity. It also mentions useful service by helping achieve just resolutions of civil disputes and encourage senior lawyers to counsel clients about their social responsibility.
- Published
- 2022
41. Getting Evidence in the US Before Commencing Litigation in Other Countries: Flexible Use of 28 USC § 1782.
- Author
-
Riback, Stuart M. and Knott, Hermann
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CIVIL law , *JURISPRUDENCE , *LAWYERS , *LEGAL judgments - Abstract
That is a sure indicator that the future lawsuit is a matter of speculation and not within reasonable contemplation.15 "Courts must guard against the specter that parties may use §1782 to investigate whether litigation is possible before launching it."16 2. The cases that grant pre-litigation §1782 applications tend to focus on the applicant having actually developed the basis for the foreign case. Getting Evidence in the US Before Commencing Litigation in Other Countries: Flexible Use of 28 USC § 1782. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2021
42. CORBITT V. PULASKI COUNTY JAIL.
- Author
-
DOWNES, HOUSTON
- Subjects
- *
ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *FIREARMS , *LAWYERS , *FORENSIC orations - Abstract
The article focuses on the legal case of Corbitt v. Pulaski County Jail, which pertains to attorney Chris Corbitt's attempt to carry a firearm into the Pulaski County District Courthouse in Arkansas. It discusses Corbitt's argument based on Arkansas law and the subsequent denial of relief by the court, highlighting the interpretation and application of firearms regulations in courthouse settings and attorneys' rights in such situations.
- Published
- 2023
43. Hidden Clients: When Do Lawyers Owe Nonclients a Duty of Care?
- Author
-
LeBoff, Michael S.
- Subjects
- *
REASONABLE care (Law) , *LAWYERS , *ATTORNEY malpractice , *ESTATE planning , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *ATTORNEY & client - Abstract
As an attorney that regularly handles legal malpractice cases, I frequently recite the standard elements of a professional negligence claim: duty, breach, causation and damages. Attorneys must recognize that when a client provides instructions intended to benefit a third party, the attorney may owe a duty of care to those intended beneficiaries of the attorney's services. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
44. The Latest Ad Boom: Lawyers Seeking Plaintiffs for Mass Litigation.
- Author
-
Mulvaney, Erin
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *PLAINTIFFS , *ADVERTISING , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *COMMERCIAL crimes - Published
- 2024
45. 4 Dogmas Debunked.
- Author
-
GARNER, BRYAN A.
- Subjects
- *
LAW , *PRACTICE of law , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *LEGAL procedure - Abstract
The article outlines ways to frame a legal issue. Topics discussed include essential factors for stating legal issues, overview of the standard method of stating a legal problem, importance of discovering the real issues in a case and an issue statement that the author considers a major breakthrough in technique.
- Published
- 2022
46. ATTORNEY PRESS STATEMENTS ABOUT CASES MAY NOT BE PROTECTED: Press and social media statements made on behalf of clients may not be protected by attorney immunity or judicial-proceedings privilege, leaving litigators open to defamation claims.
- Author
-
Mattson, Amy
- Subjects
- *
ATTORNEY-client privilege , *ATTORNEY & client , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law) , *TRIAL lawyers , *SOCIAL media - Abstract
In Landry's, Inc. et al. v. Animal Legal Defense Fund et al., a state supreme court unanimously ruled that neither the judicial-proceedings privilege nor attorney immunity shields lawyers from defamation claims arising from their pre-suit publicity efforts. Attorney Immunity Only Covers a Lawyer's Legal Services Turning next to the ALDF's assertion of attorney immunity, the Texas Supreme Court first distinguished it from the judicial-proceedings privilege. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2021
47. "FINITE PIE" CONFLICTS.
- Author
-
DOWNEY, MICHAEL
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *WAIVER , *DEFENDANTS , *PLAINTIFFS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
The article discusses the ethical and legal challenges lawyers face when representing multiple plaintiffs who are suing the same defendant. It highlights the need for conflict waivers and considerations when the defendant's resources are limited. It further focuses on navigating these complexities while maintaining ethical standards.
- Published
- 2023
48. Chesebro's Georgia Plea Deal May Increase Peril for Trump.
- Author
-
FEUER, ALAN and HABERMAN, MAGGIE
- Subjects
- *
HAZARDS , *FRAUD , *LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *CHRISTMAS , *UNITED States presidential election, 2020 - Abstract
The article focuses on Kenneth Chesebro, a lawyer involved in efforts to reverse Donald Trump's election defeat, who has pleaded guilty to conspiring to file false documents in Georgia and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in a racketeering indictment.
- Published
- 2023
49. Emails Show Lawyers Saw Suit's Political Edge.
- Author
-
HABERMAN, MAGGIE and BROADWATER, LUKE
- Subjects
- *
LAWYERS , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *SAWS , *JUDICIAL process , *ELECTORAL college - Abstract
The article focuses on emails indicating that lawyers fighting to reverse President Donald J. Trump's election defeat were aware that their legal litigation challenging Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s victory in Wisconsin had little chance of success but believed it had political value.
- Published
- 2023
50. Dearborn Heights mayor, police chief react to wrongful termination lawsuit filed by former police officer.
- Subjects
- *
POLICE chiefs , *WRONGFUL death , *POLICE , *ACTIONS & defenses (Law) , *HOSTILE work environment , *LAWYERS - Published
- 2023