Search

Supplemental Figure 1 (fig. S1). Representative whole body NaF-18 PET scan images after 44 days of (A) vehicle-treated and (B) cabozantinib-treated animals. Supplemental Figure 2 (fig. S2). Effect of cabozantinib on PDX tumor growth, animal weight, and survival. Supplemental Figure 3 (fig. S3). Representative images of viable islets of tumor cells in (A) Patients; (B) MDA PCa-118b grown intrafemurally; and (C) MDA PCa- 118b grown subcutaneously. Supplemental Figure 4 (fig. S4). Time-dependent effect of cabozantinib on expression and phosphorylation of primary and MET downstream targets. Supplemental Figure 5 (fig. S5). Relative expression of c-met mRNA in NT and knockdown cells as determined by qRT-PCR. Supplemental Figure 6 (fig. S6). MET expression and activity in NT and knockdown tumors. Supplemental Figure 7 (fig. S7): Quantitation of CD31 staining on bone tumors. Supplemental Figure 8 (fig. S8). Effects of cabozantinib on bone remodeling markers in the phase-2 clinical trial and growth and differentiation of primary osteoblasts. Supplemental Figure S9 (fig S9). Effect of cabozantinib on bone turnover in the Phase 2 trial and PDX grown intrafemurally. Supplemental Figure 10 (fig. S10). Quantitation of phospho-histone H3 staining.

PDF file - 178K

PDF file - 150K, A: Mitotic figures in the xenografts; left panel: graphical presentation of the number of mitotic figures in SCPC/LCNEC xenografts (mean 11 mitoses per high power field) and adenocarcinoma xenografts (mean 2 per high power field); right panel: pictures from H&E stained slides of a SCPC and an adenocarcinoma (AdCa) xenograft. Arrows point to the mitotic figures. B: Higher expression levels of ki67 are noted in the SCPC/LCNEC xenografts and clinical samples compared to adenocarcinomas C:Flow cytometry of SCPC xenograft 146-10 and adenocarcinoma xenograft 180-30. (SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma).

Supplementary Figure S1. Distribution of RET981 cell line. Supplementary Figure S2. Detection of AR splice variants in SDCs. Supplementary Figure S3. Cleaved PARP increased by AR siRNAs.

PDF file - 270K, mRNA levels of A, CDC20 and B, FZR1/CDH1 in SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2) and adenocarcinoma (MDA PCa 170-4 and 180-30) xenografts, normalized to GAPDH. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Purpose: We performed parallel investigations in cabozantinib-treated patients in a phase II trial and simultaneously in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to better understand the roles of MET and VEGFR2 as targets for prostate cancer therapy.Experimental Design: In the clinical trial, radiographic imaging and serum markers were examined, as well as molecular markers in tumors from bone biopsies. In mice harboring PDX intrafemurally or subcutaneously, cabozantinib effects on tumor growth, MET, PDX in which MET was silenced, VEGFR2, bone turnover, angiogenesis, and resistance were examined.Results: In responsive patients and PDX, islets of viable pMET-positive tumor cells persisted, which rapidly regrew after drug withdrawal. Knockdown of MET in PDX did not affect tumor growth in mice nor did it affect cabozantinib-induced growth inhibition but did lead to induction of FGFR1. Inhibition of VEGFR2 and MET in endothelial cells reduced the vasculature, leading to necrosis. However, each islet of viable cells surrounded a VEGFR2-negative vessel. Reduction of bone turnover was observed in both cohorts.Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that MET in tumor cells is not a persistent therapeutic target for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but inhibition of VEGFR2 and MET in endothelial cells and direct effects on osteoblasts are responsible for cabozantinib-induced tumor inhibition. However, vascular heterogeneity represents one source of primary therapy resistance, whereas induction of FGFR1 in tumor cells suggests a potential mechanism of acquired resistance. Thus, integrated cross-species investigations demonstrate the power of combining preclinical models with clinical trials to understand mechanisms of activity and resistance of investigational agents. Clin Cancer Res; 22(1); 107–21. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: To investigate the molecular events associated with the activation of androgen receptor (AR) as a potential therapeutic target in patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC).Experimental Design: Comprehensive molecular and expression analysis of the AR gene in 35 tumor specimens (20 males and 15 females) and cell lines derived from SDC using Western blotting and RT-PCR, FISH analysis, and DNA sequencing was conducted. In vitro and in vivo animal studies were also performed.Results: AR expression was detected in 70% of the tumors and was mainly nuclear and homogenous in both male and female SDCs, although variable cytoplasmic and/or nuclear localization was also found. We report the identification of ligand-independent AR splice variants, mutations, and extra AR gene copy in primary untreated SDC tumors. In contrast to prostate cancer, no AR gene amplification was observed. In vitro knockdown of AR in a female derived SDC cell line revealed marked growth inhibition in culture and in vivo androgen-independent tumor growth.Conclusions: Our study provides new detailed information on the molecular and structural alterations associated with AR gene activation in SDC and sheds more light on the putative functional role of AR in SDC cells. On the basis of these data, we propose that patients with SDC (male and female) can be stratified for hormone-based therapy in future clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6570–81. ©2014 AACR.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1. AVPC ('ANAPLASTIC') ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR NCT00514540, A PHASE II STUDY OF CARBOPLATIN AND DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH ANAPLASTIC PROSTATE CARCINOMA. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2. CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE PDX DONOR PATIENTS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3. PDX GROWTH RATE AND PSA PRODUCTION. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4. ANTIBODIES USED FOR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND WESTERN BLOT. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5. qRT-PCR PRIMER SEQUENCES. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6. DONOR PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 7. SERUM MARKER LEVELS AT TIME OF REGISTRATION TO NCT00514540. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 8. PRINCIPAL COMPONENT VARIATE WEIGHTINGS TCGA/UNSELECTED CRPC/AVPC SAMPLES. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 9. LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS WEIGHTS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 10. Tp53 MUTATIONS DETECTED IN TCGA, UNSELECTED CRPC (21) AND AVPC SAMPLES.

PDF file - 180K, A, Growth rate of MDA PCA 144-13, 146-10, 155-2, 170-4 and 180-30 xenografts. Note that the MDA PCA 144-13 xenograft line displays a large amount of necrosis. B. Diagram illustrates unsupervised hierarchal clustering using complete linkage and Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis of the raw expression profiles of androgen receptor-positive adenocarcinoma (MDA PCA 130, 117-9, 79) and androgen receptor-negative SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCA 146-10, 155-2, 155-12, 144-13, 144-4) xenografts obtained with Affymetrix HGU133Plus2 array. In red are samples assessed on 1 day and in blue, those assessed on a different day. B, diagram illustrates Gene Ontology analysis results showing enrichment in biologic-process subtrees related to mitosis among the differently expressed genes. The biological processes that reached statistical significance are highlighted in red. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Supplementary Table S1. PCR primer sequences in this study. Supplementary Table S2. AR IHC and FISH result Supplementary Table S3. AR mutation detail result in this study.

PDF file - 48K

Purpose: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology.Experimental Design: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors.Results: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts.Conclusion: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 666–77. ©2011 AACR.

PDF file - 1.1MB, A, Chromosomal regions commonly amplified (red) and deleted (blue) in the SCPC/LCNEC (left panel) and adenocarcinoma (AdCa, right panel) xenografts. B, AR, cyclin D1, and RB1 promoter methylation of the AR-positive LNCaP prostate cancer cell line, the AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, and the SCPC/LCNEC MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2 xenografts. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; AR, androgen receptor; RB, retinoblastoma.

Purpose: To study Wnt/β-catenin in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and understand its function independently of the β-catenin–androgen receptor (AR) interaction.Experimental Design: We carried out β-catenin immunocytochemical analysis, evaluated TOP-flash reporter activity (a reporter of β-catenin–mediated transcription), and sequenced the β-catenin gene in MDA prostate cancer 118a, MDA prostate cancer 118b, MDA prostate cancer 2b, and PC-3 prostate cancer cells. We knocked down β-catenin in AR-negative MDA prostate cancer 118b cells and carried out comparative gene-array analysis. We also immunohistochemically analyzed β-catenin and AR in 27 bone metastases of human CRPCs.Results: β-Catenin nuclear accumulation and TOP-flash reporter activity were high in MDA prostate cancer 118b but not in MDA prostate cancer 2b or PC-3 cells. MDA prostate cancer 118a and MDA prostate cancer 118b cells carry a mutated β-catenin at codon 32 (D32G). Ten genes were expressed differently (false discovery rate, 0.05) in MDA prostate cancer 118b cells with downregulated β-catenin. One such gene, hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), synthesizes hyaluronan, a core component of the extracellular matrix. We confirmed HAS2 upregulation in PC-3 cells transfected with D32G-mutant β-catenin. Finally, we found nuclear localization of β-catenin in 10 of 27 human tissue specimens; this localization was inversely associated with AR expression (P = 0.056, Fisher's exact test), suggesting that reduced AR expression enables Wnt/β-catenin signaling.Conclusion: We identified a previously unknown downstream target of β-catenin, HAS2, in prostate cancer, and found that high β-catenin nuclear localization and low or no AR expression may define a subpopulation of men with bone metastatic prostate cancer. These findings may guide physicians in managing these patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 726–36. ©2011 AACR.

supplementary materials and methods, supplementary tables and supplementary figure legends Supplemental Table 1: Patient Characteristics. Supplemental Table 2: Targeting sequences for c-met. Supplemental Table 3: Antibodies and Sources. Supplemental Table 4: Oligonucleotides for PCR Amplification of Mouse Alkaline Phosphatase and Osteonectin.

Supplementary Figure 1. Supervised hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes between typical CRPC PDX ("ADENO") and CRPC PDX with small cell carcinoma morphology ("SCPC"). Supplementary Figure 2. Morphologic spectrum of tumors of patients with the aggressive variant phenotype in the primary (A-D) and metastatic tumor sites (E-H) Supplementary Figure 3. Immunohistochemical analysis of all 59 available NCT00514540 samples and 8 PDX lines. Supplementary Figure 4. Principal component analysis of a16-serum-and-IHC-tumor-marker set in "Baseline" samples from 21 patients. Supplementary Figure 5. Total number of copy number alterations per sample. Supplementary Figure 6. mRNA levels of genes of interest. Supplementary Figure 7. Principal component analysis of a 10-CNA-marker set in TCGA, unsupervised CRPC and AVPC samples.

Purpose: Morphologically heterogeneous prostate cancers that behave clinically like small-cell prostate cancers (SCPC) share their chemotherapy responsiveness. We asked whether these clinically defined, morphologically diverse, “aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC)” also share molecular features with SCPC.Experimental Design: Fifty-nine prostate cancer samples from 40 clinical trial participants meeting AVPC criteria, and 8 patient-tumor derived xenografts (PDX) from 6 of them, were stained for markers aberrantly expressed in SCPC. DNA from 36 and 8 PDX was analyzed by Oncoscan for copy number gains (CNG) and losses (CNL). We used the AVPC PDX to expand observations and referenced publicly available datasets to arrive at a candidate molecular signature for the AVPC.Results: Irrespective of morphology, Ki67 and Tp53 stained ≥10% cells in 80% and 41% of samples, respectively. RB1 stained MYC (surrogate for 8q) CNG and RB1 CNL showed in 54% of 44 samples each and PTEN CNL in 48%. All but 1 of 8 PDX bore Tp53 missense mutations. RB1 CNL was the strongest discriminator between unselected castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the AVPC. Combined alterations in RB1, Tp53, and/or PTEN were more frequent in the AVPC than in unselected CRPC and in The Cancer Genome Atlas samples.Conclusions: Clinically defined AVPC share molecular features with SCPC and are characterized by combined alterations in RB1, Tp53, and/or PTEN. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1520–30. ©2015 AACR.

IHC, qRT-PCR and Western blot methods.

Supplementary Figure Legends 1-4 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis

Supplementary Figures 1-4 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis

Supplementary Table 1 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis