1. Establishing aversive, but not safe, taste memories requires lateralized pontine-cortical connections.
- Author
-
Clark EW and Bernstein IL
- Subjects
- Amygdala anatomy & histology, Amygdala metabolism, Amygdala physiology, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cerebral Cortex anatomy & histology, Cerebral Cortex metabolism, Conditioning, Operant physiology, Functional Laterality physiology, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Pons anatomy & histology, Pons metabolism, Prosencephalon anatomy & histology, Prosencephalon metabolism, Prosencephalon physiology, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos metabolism, Rats, Rats, Long-Evans, Signal Transduction physiology, Avoidance Learning physiology, Cerebral Cortex physiology, Memory physiology, Pons physiology, Taste physiology
- Abstract
Aversive and safe taste memory processing is dramatically disrupted by bilateral lesions of the pontine parabrachial nucleus (PBN). To determine how such lesions affect patterns of neuronal activation in forebrain, lesions were combined with assessment of cFos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in insular cortex (IC) and amygdala after conditioned taste aversion (CTA) training. Increases in FLI in amygdala and IC, which are normally seen following novel (versus familiar) CS-US pairing, were eliminated after PBN lesions. This suggests that PBN lesions prevent transmission of critical CS and US information to forebrain regions for the processing of both aversive and safe taste memories. Unilateral asymmetrical lesions of PBN and IC blocked CTA acquisition as well as normal patterns of FLI in amygdala after novel CS-US pairing, an effect not seen when unilateral lesions were confined to a single hemisphere. The crossed-disconnection experiments provide compelling evidence that functional interactions between PBN and IC are required for CTA acquisition, but not for safe taste memory formation and retrieval. The dissociation between effects of the different types of lesions on safe and aversive taste memories supports emerging evidence that the neural underpinnings of the two types of taste learning differ.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF