Search

Continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) operate at a constant speed mode, which could result in increased risk of adverse events due to reduced vascular pulsatility. Consequently, pump speed modulation algorithms have been proposed to augment vascular pulsatility. However, the quantitative local hemodynamic effects on the aorta when the pump is operating with speed modulation using different types of CF-LVADs are still under investigation. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was conducted to quantitatively elucidate the hemodynamic effects on a clinical patient-specific aortic model under different speed patterns of CF-LVADs. Pressure distribution, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and velocity were calculated to compare their differences at constant and pulsatile speeds under centrifugal and axial LVAD support. Results showed that pulse pressure on the aorta was significantly larger under pulsatile speed mode than that under constant speed mode for both CF-LVADs, indicating enhanced aorta pulsatility, as well as the higher peak blood flow velocity on some representative slices of aorta. Pulsatile speed modulation enhanced peak WSS compared to constant speed; high TAWSS region appeared near the branch of left common carotid artery and distal aorta regardless of speed modes and CF-LVADs but these regions also had low OSI; RRT was almost the same for all the cases. This study may provide a basis for the scientific and reasonable selection of the pulsatile speed patterns of CF-LVADs for treating heart failure patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Continuous flow rotary blood pumps (RBP) operating clinically at constant rotational speeds cannot match cardiac demand during varying physical activities, are susceptible to suction, diminish vascular pulsatility, and have an increased risk of adverse events. A sensorless, physiologic feedback control strategy for RBP was developed to mitigate these limitations. The proposed algorithm used intrinsic pump speed to obtain differential pump speed (Δ RPM ). The proposed gain-scheduled proportional-integral controller, switching of setpoints between a higher pump speed differential setpoint (Δ RPM Hr ) and a lower pump speed differential setpoint (Δ RPM Lr ), generated pulsatility and physiologic perfusion, while avoiding suction. The switching between Δ RPM Hr and Δ RPM Lr setpoints occurred when the measured Δ RPM reached the pump differential reference setpoint. In-silico tests were implemented to assess the proposed algorithm during rest, exercise, a rapid 3-fold pulmonary vascular resistance increase, rapid change from exercise to rest, and compared with maintaining a constant pump speed setpoint. The proposed control algorithm augmented aortic pressure pulsatility to over 35 mmHg during rest and around 30 mmHg during exercise. Significantly, ventricular suction was avoided, and adequate cardiac output was maintained under all simulated conditions. The performance of the sensorless algorithm using estimation was similar to the performance of sensor-based method. This study demonstrated that augmentation of vascular pulsatility was feasible while avoiding ventricular suction and providing physiological pump outflows. Augmentation of vascular pulsatility can minimize adverse events that have been associated with diminished pulsatility. Mock circulation and animal studies would be conducted to validate these results., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Background: Continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (CF-VADs) produce non-physiologic flow with diminished pulsatility, which is a major risk factor for development of adverse events, including gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Introduction of artificial pulsatility by modulating CF-VAD flow has been suggested as a potential solution. However, the levels of pulsatility and frequency of CF-VAD modulation necessary to prevent adverse events are currently unknown and need to be evaluated., Methods: The purpose of this study was to use human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) cultured within an endothelial cell culture model (ECCM) to: (i) identify and validate biomarkers to determine the effects of pulsatility; and (ii) conclude whether introduction of artificial pulsatility using flow-modulation approaches can mitigate changes in endothelial cells seen with diminished pulsatile flow. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2)-regulated anti-oxidant genes and proteins and the endothelial nitric oxide synthase/endothelin-1 (eNOS/ET-1) signaling pathway are known to be differentially regulated in response to changes in pulsatility., Results: Comparison of HAECs cultured within the ECCM (normal pulsatile vs CF-VAD) with aortic wall samples from patients (normal pulsatile [n = 5] vs CF-VADs [n = 5]) confirmed that both the Nrf-2-activated anti-oxidant response and eNOS/ET-1 signaling pathways were differentially regulated in response to diminished pulsatility. Evaluation of 2 specific CF-VAD flow-modulation protocols to introduce artificial pulsatility, synchronous (SYN, 80 cycles/min, pulse pressure 20 mm Hg) and asynchronous (ASYN, 40 cycles/min, pulse pressure 45 mm Hg), suggested that both increased expression of Nrf-2-regulated anti-oxidant genes and proteins along with changes in levels of eNOS and ET-1 can potentially be minimized with ASYN and, to a lesser extent, with SYN., Conclusions: HAECs cultured within the ECCM can be used as an accurate model of large vessels in patients to identify biomarkers and select appropriate flow-modulation protocols. Pressure amplitude may have a greater effect in normalizing anti-oxidant response compared with frequency of modulation., (Copyright © 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has the potential to increase the donor pool for lung transplantation by facilitating resuscitation and extended evaluation of marginal organs. Current EVLP methodology employs continuous flow (CF) pumps that produce non-pulsatile EVLP hemodynamics. In this feasibility study, we tested the hypothesis that a pulsatile flow (PF) pump will provide better EVLP support than a CF pump through delivery of physiologic hemodynamics., Methods: Porcine lungs were supported in an EVLP model by centrifugal CF (n = 3) or PF (n = 4) left ventricular assist devices. Lungs were ventilated at 4 to 5 mL/kg, 0.21 fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), and perfused with an acellular, albumin-based solution corrected for osmolarity, acid-base balance, and carbon dioxide pressure (≤20 hours at 30°C) for a minimum of 12 hours support. Prostaglandin E1 and 30% albumin were infused continuously. Hemodynamic, respiratory, and blood gas parameters were continuously monitored and digitally recorded hourly. Parenchymal biopsies were used for quantification of wet to dry weight ratio., Results: All lungs maintained function in the EVLP circuit for a minimum of 12 hours (mean 14.7 ± 1 hours) and demonstrated minimal edema formation. The PF EVLP produced higher pulsatility as demonstrated by greater energy equivalent pressure and surplus hemodynamic energy compared with CF EVLP (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in pulmonary impedance, arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen, wet to dry weight ratio, and peak airway pressure between CF and PF EVLP., Conclusions: The CF and PF EVLP systems successfully maintained lungs 12+ hours using a modified Steen perfusate (XVIVO Perfusion, Inc, Goteborg, Sweden); however, there were no statistically significant differences between CF and PF groups despite higher pulsatility, suggesting that PF may not offer immediate benefits over CF for prolonged ex vivo lung preservation., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rotary blood pumps operate at a constant speed (rpm) that diminishes vascular pulsatility and variation in ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, which may contribute to adverse events, including aortic insufficiency and gastrointestinal bleeding. In this study, pump speed modulation algorithms for generating pulsatility and variation in ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were investigated in an ischemic heart failure (IHF) bovine model (n = 10) using a clinically implanted centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD)., Methods: Hemodynamic and hematologic measurements were recorded during IHF baseline, constant pumps speeds, and asynchronous (19-60 cycles/min) and synchronous (copulse and counterpulse) pump speed modulation profiles using low relative pulse speed (±25%) of 3,200 ± 800 rpm and high relative pulse speed (±38%) of 2,900 ± 1,100 rpm. End-organ perfusion, hemodynamics, and pump parameters were measured to characterize pulsatility, myocardial workload, and LVAD performance for each speed modulation profile., Results: Speed modulation profiles augmented aortic pulse pressure, surplus hemodynamic energy, and end-organ perfusion (p < 0.01) compared with operation at constant speed. Left ventricular external work and myocardial oxygen consumption were significantly reduced compared with IHF baseline (p < 0.01) but at the expense of higher LVAD power consumption., Conclusions: Pump speed modulation increases pulsatility and improves cardiac function and end-organ perfusion, but the asynchronous mode provides the technologic advantage of sensorless control. Investigation of asynchronous pump speed modulation during long-term support is warranted to test the hypothesis that operating an LVAD with speed modulation will minimize adverse events in patients supported by an LVAD that may be associated with long-term operation at a constant pump speed., (Copyright © 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (CVADs) have gained widespread use as an effective clinical therapy for patients with advanced-stage heart failure. Axial and centrifugal CVADs have been successfully used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy. CVADs are smaller, more reliable, and less complex than the first-generation pulsatile-flow ventricular assist devices. Despite their recent clinical success, arteriovenous malformations, gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhagic strokes, aortic valve insufficiency, and valve fusion have been reported in heart failure patients supported by CVADs. It has been hypothesized that diminished arterial pressure and flow pulsatility delivered by CVAD may be a contributing factor to these adverse events. Subsequently, the clinical significance of vascular pulsatility continues to be highly debated. Studies comparing pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow support have presented conflicting findings, largely due to variations in device operation, support duration, and the criteria used to quantify pulsatility. Traditional measurements of pulse pressure and pulsatility index are less effective at quantifying pulsatility for mechanically derived flows, particularly with the growing trend of CVAD speed modulation to achieve various pulsatile flow patterns. Kinetic measurements of energy equivalent pressure and surplus hemodynamic energy can better quantify pulsatile energies, yet technologic and conceptual challenges are impeding their clinical adaption. A review of methods for quantifying vascular pulsatility and their application as a research tool for investigating physiologic responses to CVAD support are presented., (Copyright © 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The circadian rhythm of varying blood pressure and heart rate is attenuated or absent in patients with severe heart failure. In 28 patients supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for at least 30 days, a restoration of the circadian rhythm was demonstrated by a consistent nocturnal decrease, and then increase, of the LVAD flow while at a constant LVAD speed. The return of the circadian rhythm has implications for cardiac recovery, and the observation indicates that the continuous-flow LVAD has an intrinsic automatic response to physiologic demands., (Copyright 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Direct measurement of blood flow output has been incorporated into ventricular assist devices (VADs), but long-term reliability of the additional device components has raised concerns regarding sensor drift and failure. As an alternative approach, the HeartMate II axial VAD (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) estimates device flow output from power consumption and rotational speed of the device motor. This study evaluated the accuracy of HeartMate II flow estimation at the time of implantation., Methods: In 20 patients, intraoperative blood flow measurement of the HeartMate II flow estimator was compared with flow values obtained with an ultrasonic flow probe placed around the device outflow graft. Estimated and measured VAD flow data were simultaneously recorded and digitally stored while the device motor speed varied from 7,800 to 11,000 rpm and while achieving device flow outputs of 2 to 7 liters/min. Estimated and measured flows were compared using linear regression analyses and root mean square error., Results: HeartMate II flow estimation (FE) demonstrated a linear correlation with ultrasonic flow probe (FP) measurements: FE = 0.74 FP + 0.99 (R(2) = 0.56, p = 0.0001). A root mean square error of 0.8 liters/min was observed between flow estimation and direct flow measurement and suggests a 15% to 20% difference at flows of 4 of 6 liters/min., Conclusions: These results suggest that HeartMate II flow estimation may be used to provide directional information for trend purposes rather than absolute values of device blood flow output. Patient management should include but not be limited to this information.

Background: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (Z(ART)) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that Z(ART) is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts., Methods: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate Z(ART), and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model., Results: Humans with HF had greater Z(ART) than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 +/- 0.12 vs 1.00 +/- 0.10 mm Hg x s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 +/- 0.21 vs 1.88 +/- 0.33 ml x mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 +/- 0.07 mm Hg x s/ml; pig: 0.90 +/- 0.07 mm Hg x s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 +/- 0.37 ml x mm Hg; pig: 2.80 +/- 0.64 ml x mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts., Conclusions: Z(ART) is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load.