This article focuses on the implications of the move of United States President-elect George Bush to name Elizabeth Hanford Dole as secretary of the Department of Labor. Until a few years ago, most of the nation's work-related problems got resolved, for better or worse, by Darwinian struggles between labor and management. But the extraordinary decline of union power in the early 1980s left an enormous vacuum where organized labor once functioned as the pattern-setter for the entire economy on wages, benefits, and working conditions. How to fill that void is emerging as a critical question. Several tough employment issues, such as child care and the minimum wage, are likely to force early clashes between Bush, Dole and Congress controlled by Democrats. But these skirmishes will only be forerunners to battles over deeper labor problems that have arisen because of organized labor's fading strength and demographic changes in the work force. With unions representing less than 13% of the private-industry work force, down from more than 20% in the 1970s, more and more nonunion employees are looking to the courts for protection against arbitrary management decisions. Dole got a reputation as a poor administrator at Transportation. She cannot escape suspicion that Bush named her largely to appease her husband, Republican Senate leader Bob Dole, whose help Bush needs in the Congress.