1. Pure laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: propensity score matching analysis
- Author
-
Asunción López-Conesa, Roberto Brusadin, Álvaro Navarro-Barrios, Domingo Perez-Flores, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Paula Gomez-Valles, Valentín Cayuela, and Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Subjects
Liver surgery ,Laparoscopic surgery ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cirrhosis ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Liver Neoplasms ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Resection ,Surgery ,Postoperative Complications ,Blood loss ,Propensity score matching ,Cohort ,Hepatectomy ,Humans ,Medicine ,Hand assisted ,Laparoscopy ,Propensity Score ,business ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection of tumors located in segments 7 and 8 are considered a complex resection. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients operated by pure laparoscopic (PLS) vs hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). METHODS From January 2003 to January 2021, we included patients with minimally invasive surgery for lesions located in segments 7 and 8. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) between HALS and PLS cohorts, including 30 patients in each of the groups. Of the 60 patients who underwent PSM, we compared the first 30 patients with the following 30 patients. RESULTS A total of 79 LLRs were performed, 46 by HALS and 33 by PLS. After PSM, in the PLS cohort, cirrhosis was more frequent (33.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02). The surgical time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver, clamping time, and morbidity were similar between both groups, but with a lower hospital stay in the PLS group (3 days vs. 4 days, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF