1. Emotional distress in neuro-ICU survivor–caregiver dyads: The recovering together randomized clinical trial
- Author
-
Ryan A Mace, Melissa V Gates, Ethan G. Lester, Eric A. Macklin, Sarah M. Bannon, Talea Cornelius, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Jonathan Rosand, and Paula J Popok
- Subjects
Partner effects ,Psychological Distress ,Article ,law.invention ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Intensive care ,Adaptation, Psychological ,medicine ,Humans ,Survivors ,Applied Psychology ,Depression ,business.industry ,Secondary data ,Intensive Care Units ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Distress ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Caregivers ,Quality of Life ,Anxiety ,Health education ,medicine.symptom ,business ,human activities ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Objective Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
- Published
- 2022