1. Risk Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes of Low-risk Early-stage Human Papillomavirus-Associated Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Treated by Surgery Alone: Application of Silva Pattern.
- Author
-
Bae BK, Bae H, Cho WK, Kim BG, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee YY, Lee JW, Kim HS, and Park W
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Human Papillomavirus Viruses isolation & purification, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local virology, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Adenocarcinoma virology, Adenocarcinoma surgery, Adenocarcinoma mortality, Papillomavirus Infections complications, Papillomavirus Infections pathology, Papillomavirus Infections virology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms surgery, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms virology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes and risk factors for survival of patients with low-risk early-stage human papillomavirus-associated (HPVA) endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with surgery alone. This retrospective study obtained the clinicopathological data of patients with early-stage HPVA EAC who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2018. The Silva pattern of invasion was determined by reviewing pathology slides. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (RFS), RFS, and overall survival were calculated, and the risk factors for survival were analyzed. One hundred seventeen patients with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (0.5-9.7 yr) were included. The most common histologic type was usual (94/117, 80.3%). The Silva pattern was A in 79 patients (67.5%), B in 30 (25.6%), and C in 8 (6.8%). The 5-year locoregional RFS, RFS, and overall survival rates were 92.4%, 87.8%, and 97.2%, respectively. The presence of intermediate-risk factors and Silva pattern C were significantly associated with worse survival. Based on these findings, patients were categorized into 2 groups: Group 1 (Silva pattern A or Silva pattern B without intermediate-risk factors) and Group 2 (Silva pattern B with intermediate-risk factors or Silva pattern C ). Group 2 showed significantly worse outcomes than Group 1, including the 5-year locoregional RFS (98.6% vs 68.0%), RFS (96.4% vs 54.6%), and overall survival (100.0% vs 86.5%). In conclusion, surgery alone for early-stage HPVA EAC resulted in favorable outcomes. Consideration of the Silva pattern, in addition to well-known risk factors, could help in precise risk group stratification of low-risk, early-stage HPVA EAC., Competing Interests: H.S.K.’s work is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT; 2023R1A2C2006223). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF