Hatchling painted turtles (Chrysemys picta), Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingi), slider turtles (Trachemys scripta), and snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) were inoculated with ice at temperatures near the equilibrium freezing point for their body fluids (ca. -0.7 C) and then frozen at -2.0 C. All animals survived freezing for up to 30 h, but mortality among sliders and snapping turtles increased rapidly with longer exposures. Despite the fact that neonates of all four species are able to recover from freezing at a high subzero temperature, the adaptive strategy manifested by animals in the field is to avoid freezing altogether via attributes of morphology (painted turtles), behavior (Blanding's turtles, snapping turtles), or distribution (slider turtles). The discovery of a tolerance for freezing in hatchlings of species having diverse distributions and natural histories raises the possibility that such tolerance is a trait of general occurrence among neonatal turtles and that it is not an adaptation specifically enabling animals to withstand the rigors of winter. Hatchlings of the North American painted turtle (Emydidae: Chrysemys picta) typically spend their first winter inside the shallow, subterranean nest where they completed embryogenesis the preceding summer (Ernst et al., 1994). This behavior commonly causes neonates in northerly populations to be exposed during winter to ice and cold (Breitenbach et al., 1984; Storey et al., 1988; Packard et al., 1989; Costanzo et al., 1995), with temperatures in nests sometimes going below -10 C (Woolverton, 1963; DePari, 1996; Packard, 1997; Packard et al., 1997a). Hatchling painted turtles are small (3-6 g), ectothermic animals with limited heat capacity, so their deep body temperature presumably tracks the temperature in their nest quite closely (Claussen and Zani, 1991). Nevertheless, some turtles commonly survive exposure to such temperatures and emerge from their nest when the ground thaws the following spring (Woolverton, 1963; DePari, 1996; Packard, 1997; Packard et al., 1997a). We have proposed that neonatal painted turtles in northerly populations withstand exposure to ice and cold by remaining unfrozen and supercooled (Packard and Packard, 1995a). According to this theory, the skin of hatchlings is not easily penetrated by growing crystals of ice (Packard and Packard, 1993b), so turtles are not necessarily caused to freeze by inoculation when they make contact with ice in frozen soil (Packard et al., 1997b, 1999). This protection from inoculation enables the animals to exploit an innate capacity for supercooling (Packard and Packard, 1993a, 1995b, 1997; Packard and Janzen, 1996; Costanzo et al., 1998), so that they remain unfrozen over the usual range of subzero temperatures encountered in nests in the field (Packard et al., 1997b, 1999). However, on those occasions when the integument is not up to the challenge and ice crystals manage to penetrate into body compartments from the environment, the animals freeze and die (Packard et al., 1997b, 1999). Thus, turtles that emerge from nests in the spring presumably are ones that remained unfrozen and supercooled for the entire winter. However, a nagging problem with the concept that hatchling painted turtles exploit a capacity for supercooling to survive winters in the field is the indisputable evidence from experiments in the laboratory that neonates often recover from freezing at relatively high subzero temperatures (Storey et al., 1988; Churchill and Storey, 1992a; Rubinsky et al., 1994; Costanzo et al., 1995; Attaway et al., 1998). The problem that these findings create for proponents of an adaptive strategy based on supercooling can be reduced to a simple question: Why do animals tolerate freezing if such a tolerance is not important to their ecology? We believe that we have obtained a partial answer to the aforementioned question. Results from the first of two experiments reported here indicate that a tolerance for limited freezing is common to hatchling turtles generally, that is, that such tolerance probably was acquired from some common ancestor of turtles and is a shared (plesiomorphic) character in contemporary forms. The evidence was gathered by studying tolerance for freezing in hatchlings of four species of North American turtles-painted turtles, Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingi), slider turtles (Trachemys scripta), and snapping This content downloaded from 207.46.13.129 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:51:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms FREEZING IN HATCHLING TURTLES turtles (Chelydra serpentina)-that differ in geographic distribution and in the natural history of overwintering neonates. All the hatchlings in this experiment were frozen at -2 C and then held at that temperature for up to 48 h before their condition (i.e., alive or dead) was assessed. We also performed a second experiment, in which hatchling painted turtles were frozen at -2 C for 24 h and then exposed for varying intervals to -2 C, -3 C, or -4 C. Data from this second experiment provide new insights into the possible role of freeze-tolerance in enabling neonates of this species to survive winters in the field. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eggs of painted turtles and snapping turtles were collected in June 1996 from newly constructed nests located on the Valentine National Wildlife Refuge in north-central Nebraska, whereas eggs of Blanding's turtles were collected that same month from fresh nests located along the Mississippi River in central Minnesota. Eggs of sliders, on the other hand, were obtained by injecting gravid females from westcentral Illinois with synthetic oxytocin to induce them to oviposit. The eggs of all species were incubated to hatching on damp vermiculite. Hatchling Blanding's turtles and sliders later were transported to Colorado State University by air express. Average mass for hatchlings was 3.7 g (SD = 0.6 g) for painted turtles; 7.7 g (SD = 0.4 g) for Blanding's turtles; 6.0 g (SD = 1.1 g) for slider turtles; and 7.8 g (SD = 1.1 g) for snapping turtles. The turtles were acclimated to approximately 2 C and held in darkness until they were used to study their tolerance for freezing (Packard and Packard, 1993a). Samples of 8-12 turtles were drawn at random from the pools of available animals. Each hatchling in a sample then was prepared for study by cleaning it thoroughly with a small paint brush, after which the measuring junction of a copper/constantan thermocouple (26 gauge) was affixed to its carapace with epoxy resin. When the resin had hardened, the turtle was dipped in chilled (2 C) tap water to wet its integument-especially the skin in the axillary and inguinal pouches, because this integument in painted turtles may be more susceptible than skin elsewhere on the body to penetration by growing crystals of ice (Packard and Packard, 1995b). Each turtle was placed immediately into a pint-volume canning jar, and the sealed jar was placed in an environmental chamber set at approximately 2 C. After all jars were in the chamber, free ends of the thermocouples were attached via a multiplexor to a Campbell CR-10 datalogger so that temperature on the carapace of the animals could be measured every 30 sec. We next allowed temperature of the turtles to equilibrate with that of the environmental chamber. We then opened the chamber, removed the lid from each jar, placed several pieces of crushed ice against the turtle, and closed the jar. After ice had been added to all the jars, the door to the environmental chamber was closed and the microprocessor controlling the chamber was reset to a nominal temperature of -2 C. Temperature in the chamber declined rapidly, and so too did surface temperature of the turtles (Fig. 1). When temperature reached approximately -0.4 C, ice crystals contacting each turtle caused water on the integument to begin to freeze, as evidenced by a slight decrease in slope of the cooling curve brought about by the release of latent heat of fusion by water changing phase from liquid to solid (Fig. 1). In most cases, the turtle was inoculated shortly thereafter, as evidenced by a pronounced freezing exotherm (i.e., the sudden increase in temperature caused by the release of latent heat of fusion) that lasted for 12-15 h (Fig. 1A, C, D). No freezing exotherm was detected in the temperature profiles for three of the painted turtles (Fig. 1B), so these animals apparently avoided inoculation and remained unfrozen for the duration of their exposure. Timing of each exposure began with the appearance of the freezing exotherm for the turtle itself (Fig. 1A, C, D). Animals in the first experiment comparing hatchlings of all four species were frozen at approximately -2 C for 24-48 h. Some variation occurred in the equilibrium temperatures that actually were measured on the carapace of animals in different jars, owing to the spatial variation in temperature that commonly occurs in environmental chambers (Measures et al., 1973). The average temperature across species and exposures was -2.1 C (range -1.8 C to -2.6 C) and did not vary among species or treatment. Painted turtles in the second experiment were frozen first at -2 C for 24 h. Some of the hatchlings then were allowed to remain at this temperature for another 48 or 72 h whereas animals in other groups were subsequently cooled to minima of -3 (range -2.8 C to -3.2 C) or -4 C (range -3.8 C to -4.2 C). Rates of cooling in the latter tests were 1 C/day or 2 C/day (see Fig. 3). Temperature in the chamber was increased to 2 C at the end of each test and the animals were allowed to thaw overnight. The condition of the turtles (i.e., alive or dead) then was assessed by examining their eyes (which often are only partially open in moribund animals) and by observing their spontaneous activity and respons537 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.129 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:51:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms