Search

Aims Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and are both associated with increased levels of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP). It is known that AF impairs the diagnostic accuracy of NT‐proBNP for HF. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic and predictive accuracy of NT‐proBNP for HF and AF in stable outpatients with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods and results Data were obtained from the DIAST‐CHF trial, a prospective cohort study that recruited individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and followed them up for 12 years. Data were validated in three independent population‐based cohorts using the same inclusion/exclusion criteria: LIFE‐Adult (n = 2869), SHIP (n = 2013), and SHIP‐TREND (n = 2408). Serum levels of NT‐proBNP were taken once at baseline. The DIAST‐CHF study enrolled 1727 study participants (47.7% female, mean age 66.9 ± 8.1 years). At baseline, patients without AF or HF (n = 1375) had a median NT‐proBNP of 94 pg/mL (interquartile range 51;181). In patients with AF (n = 93), NT‐proBNP amounted to 667 (215;1130) pg/mL. It was significantly higher than in the first group (P 50% [n = 38; 603 (175;1070) pg/mL] and those without HF (P = 1.0). Receiver‐operating characteristic curves of NT‐proBNP showed a similar area under the curve (AUC) for the detection of AF at baseline (0.84, 95% CI [0.79–0.88]) and for HF with EF 50% was significantly lower (0.61 [0.56–0.65]) than for AF (P = 0.001). During follow‐up, AF was newly diagnosed in 157 (9.1%) and HF in 141 (9.6%) study participants. NT‐proBNP was a better predictor of incident AF during the first 2 years (AUC: 0.79 [0.75–0.83]) than of newly diagnosed HF (0.59 [0.55–0.63]; P 50% is very limited.

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a common disease and one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are different diseases with distinct as well as comparable pathophysiologies and diverse responses to therapeutic agents. We aimed to identify possible pathobiochemical signalling pathways and biomarkers in HFpEF and HFrEF by using a broad proteomic approach.A total of 180 biomarkers in the plasma of a representative subgroup (71 years old) of HFpEF (70% female) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and HFrEF (18% female) with an LVEF ≤ 40% patients (n = 127) from the Prevalence and Clinical Course of Diastolic Dysfunction and Diastolic Heart Failure (DIAST-CHF) trial were examined and compared with a healthy control group (n = 40; 48% female). We were able to identify 35 proteins that were expressed significantly different in both HF groups compared with the control group. We determine 29 unique proteins expressed in HFpEF and 33 unique proteins in HFrEF. Significantly up-regulated trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) and down-regulated contactin-1 could be identified as previously unknown biomarkers for HF. However, TFF3 is also a predictive factor for the occurrence of a cardiovascular event in HFpEF patients. In HFpEF, serine protease 27 was found at reduced levels for the first time, which could offer a new therapeutic target. Additionally, network analyses showed a special role of platelet-derived growth factor subunit A, Dickkopf-related protein 1, and tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 in HFpEF patients, whereas perlecan and junctional adhesion molecule A stood out in the HFrEF group. Overall, signalling pathways of metabolic processes, cellular stress, and iron metabolism seemed to be important for HFrEF, whereas for HFpEF, oxygen stress, haemostasis, cell renewal, cell migration, and cell proliferation are in the foreground.The identified proteins and signalling pathways offer new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches for patients with chronic HF.

Despite considerable advances in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) over the last 60 years, mortality and morbidity remains high. Fortunately, in the last years, further developments expanded the toolbox for HF treatment.The authors provide an overview of recent developments in HF treatment and bring the recommendations in the HF guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology into perspective.Nowadays, basic pharmacological treatment of patients with HFrEF consists of a combination of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Treatment initiation of all four drug classes should be fast and simultaneous. In some cases, the ARNI sacubitril/valsartan may be initiated even in ACE inhibitor-naïve patients. Further HF treatment has to be individualized. Another important point is that both SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat can be used in patients with severely reduced kidney function. Finally, an important piece in the HF management puzzle is the treatment of its comorbidities. For instance, patients hospitalized for acute HF decompensation should be systematically screened for iron deficiency, since HF patients with proven iron deficiency benefit from intravenous ferric carboxymaltose.

Zusammenfassung

Aims: Galectin-3 (Gal-3) predicts long-term outcome among patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The ability of Gal-3 to diagnose and predict incident HFpEF in a cohort at risk for HFpEF is of particular interest. We aimed to determine the association between Gal-3 and clinical manifestations of HFpEF, the relationship between Gal-3 and all-cause mortality, or the composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death. Methods and results: The observational Diast-CHF study included patients aged 50 to 85 years with ���1 risk factor for HF (e.g. hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic disease) or previously suspected HF. Patients were followed for 10 years. The association between Gal-3, evidence of diastolic dysfunction, and Framingham criteria for HF was examined. All deaths and hospitalizations were adjudicated as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. The analysis population was composed of 1386 subjects (67 years old, 50.9% female). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to diagnose HFpEF was 0.71. At a cut-off value of 13.57 ng/mL, sensitivity was 0.61 and specificity was 0.73 for Gal-3, and the diagnostic power to detect HFpEF was superior to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.59, P > 0.001). Baseline Gal-3 was associated with risk factors for HF (P < 0.001). Higher levels of Gal-3 predicted incident HFpEF (P < 0.05), adjusted all-cause mortality (P < 0.001), and the adjusted composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death (P < 0.001), both independent from N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Conclusions: Gal-3 differentiated patients with HFpEF from an overall cohort of well-characterized patients with risk factors for HFpEF. Independent of other factors, baseline Gal-3 levels were associated with a higher risk for incident HFpEF, mortality, or the composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death over 10 year follow-up. In conjunction with clinical parameters, Gal-3 adds a statistically significant value for the diagnosis of HFpEF within this study, yet the clinical relevance remains debatable.

Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a common condition with no pharmacological treatment. Physical activity (PA) improves symptoms and quality of life (QoL), but no clear recommendations exist on PA in HFpEF patients. We investigated the association of PA (amount/intensity) on clinical phenotype in HFpEF. Methods and results The Aldosterone in Diastolic Heart Failure trial investigated spironolactone vs. placebo in stable HFpEF patients. At baseline, all patients underwent detailed phenotypization including echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 6 minute walking test (6MWT), and QoL assessment (36-item Short-Form questionnaire). PA was assessed by a self-report questionnaire, classified in metabolic equivalents of task (MET) and analysed with regard to exercise capacity, diastolic function, and QoL. Four hundred twenty-two patients (52% women, age 67 ± 8 years, New York Heart Association II and III) were classified by weekly MET hours into a low ( 140) level of PA. Total PA correlated positively with 6MWT distance (r = 0.17; P = 0.002) and physical function of QoL (r = 0.10; P = 0.05), but not with peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2). In contrast, both 6MWT distance and peakVO2 were significantly higher in patients who performed high-intensity PA for >8 h/week (P

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common disease with high incidence and increasing prevalence. Patients suffer from functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life, and reduced prognosis. A pilot study in a smaller group of HFpEF patients showed that structured, supervised exercise training (ET) improves maximal exercise capacity, diastolic function, and physical quality of life. However, the long-term effects of ET on patient-related outcomes remain unclear in HFpEF. The primary objective of the Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure (Ex-DHF) trial is to investigate whether a 12 month supervised ET can improve a clinically meaningful composite outcome score in HFpEF patients. Components of the outcome score are all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, NYHA functional class, global self-rated health, maximal exercise capacity, and diastolic function. After undergoing baseline assessments to determine whether ET can be performed safely, 320 patients at 11 trial sites with stable HFpEF are randomized 1:1 to supervised ET in addition to usual care or to usual care alone. Patients randomized to ET perform supervised endurance/resistance ET (3 times/week at a certified training centre) for 12 months. At baseline and during follow-up, anthropometry, echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and health-related quality of life evaluation are performed. Blood samples are collected to examine various biomarkers. Overall physical activity, training sessions, and adherence are monitored and documented throughout the study using patient diaries, heart rate monitors, and accelerometers. The Ex-DHF trial is the first multicentre trial to assess the long-term effects of a supervised ET programme on different outcome measures in patients with HFpEF.

Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is a marker for diastolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (pEF). The interaction between arterial stiffness (AS) and elevated LVFP has not been sufficiently investigated. In 257 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean age: 66 years, 53% female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 61%) and at least one cardiovascular risk factor (eg, hypertension and diabetes) for the development of HF or a previous diagnosis of HF, LVFP was estimated in accordance with the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (elevated when E/e' ≥ 13, left atrial volume index ≥ 34 mL/m 2 ). LVFP was correlated with radial pulse wave analysis (augmentation index normalized by 75 b/min [AIx@75]) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). Thirty-eight percent of patients demonstrated an elevated LVFP. These patients were significantly older (68.3 ± 7.4 vs. 63.5 ± 7.6 years, P P P P P P P P r = 0.292, P r = 0.167, P r = 0.255, P r = −0.192, P r = −0.508, P r = −0.159, P r = 0.380, P r = 0.200, P r = 0.189, P r = −0.334, P

Die Verbesserung der Lebensqualitat gehort zu den wichtigsten Behandlungszielen der Herzinsuffizienztherapie. Korperliches Wohlbefinden, wesentlicher Bestandteil der Lebensqualitat, wurde bislang durch krankheitsspezifische Erfassungsinstrumente ungenugend berucksichtigt. Unser Studienziel war die Validierung des zur Erfassung des subjektiven korperlichen Wohlbefindens entwickelten FEW16-Fragebogens im Kollektiv der Studie „Exercise Training in Diastolic Heart Failure“ (Ex-DHF‑P). 64 herzinsuffiziente Patienten mit erhaltener Ejektionsfraktion (HFpEF; 65 Jahre, 56 % weiblich) erhielten eine Standardbehandlung mit (n = 44) oder ohne Trainingsintervention (n = 20). Bei Studienbeginn und nach 3 Monaten wurden sie klinisch untersucht und zu Lebensqualitat (SF36), korperlichem Wohlbefinden (FEW16) und Depression (PHQ-D) befragt. Der FEW16 zeigte gute Cronbachs-Alpha-Werte (0,85–0,93). Bei Studienbeginn korrelierte der FEW16-Gesamtwert mit Alter, 6‑Minuten-Gehtest und den SF36- und PHQ-D-Skalen, jedoch starker mit psychisch als mit korperlich ausgerichteten Skalen. Bei Follow-up waren Gesamtscore und Widerstandsfahigkeit in der Trainingsgruppe verbessert. Der FEW16 stellte keine Unterschiede zwischen den Studiengruppen dar, wie fur den SF36 bei Ex-DHF‑P fruher publiziert. Der FEW16 demonstrierte gute interne Konsistenz und Kreuzkorrelation mit dem SF36 und spiegelte das verbesserte Wohlbefinden der Patienten, reflektierte jedoch Veranderungen durch die Intervention nicht gut genug. Er ist daher eher fur die Erfassung des allgemeinen/psychischen Wohlbefindens geeignet als fur die Erfassung des subjektiven korperlichen Wohlbefindens.

Aims: High prevalence and lack of pharmacological treatment are making heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) a growing public health problem. No algorithm for the screening of asymptomatic patients with risk for HFpEF exists to date. We assessed whether HFA/ESC 2007 diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are helpful to investigate the cardiovascular outcome in asymptomatic patients. Methods and results: We performed an analysis of the Diagnostic Trial on Prevalence and Clinical Course of Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure (DIAST-CHF) that recruited patients with cardiovascular risk factors. All patients underwent a comprehensive diagnostic workup at baseline. Asymptomatic patients with preserved LVEF (>50%) were selected and classified according to HFA/ESC surrogate criteria for left ventricular elevated filling pressure (mean E/e’ >15 or E/e’ >8 and presence of either NT-proBNP > 220 ng/l, BNP > 200 ng/l or atrial fibrillation) into elevated filling pressure (FPe) or controls. Cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause death were assessed for both groups over a 10-year-follow-up.851 asymptomatic patients (age 65.5 ± 7.6 years, 44% female) were included in the analysis. FPe-patients were significantly older (p

Hintergrund und Fragestellung | Die Rolle von Biomarkern bei asymptomatischer diastolischer Dysfunktion (DD) ist bislang wenig untersucht. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersuchte daher die klinischen Assoziationen und diagnostischen Fahigkeiten verschiedener Biomarker bei asymptomatischer DD. Methodik | 188 gesunde Probanden (linksventrikulare Ejektionsfraktion ≥ 50 %, 50–85 Jahre) ohne kardiovaskulare Risikofaktoren wurden prospektiv im Rahmen einer bevolkerungsbasierten Beobachtungsstudie rekrutiert. Von diesen hatten n = 103 eine echokardiografisch definierte DD (Grad ≥ 1), n = 85 Patienten ohne DD wurden dem Kontrollkollektiv (KON) zugeordnet. wurden standardisiert durchgefuhrt. Ergebnisse | GDF-15, MRproADM und CTproAVP waren in der DD-Gruppe im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe signifikant erhoht: Es zeigte sich fur GDF-15, MRproADM und CTproAVP eine signifikante Assoziation zum Vorliegen einer DD (Grad ≥ 1). Diese Assoziationen waren jedoch nach multipler Adjustierung nicht mehr nachweisbar. Zum linksventrikularen Fullungsindex (E / e’) als kontinuierlichen Parameter der diastolischen Funktion zeigten NTproBNP, MRproANP, MRproADM, nicht aber GDF-15, CTproET1 und CTproAVP signifikante bivariate Korrelationen. Diese Assoziationen waren nach multipler Adjustierung nicht mehr nachweisbar. Keiner der untersuchten Biomarker zeigte in den ROC-Analysen eine ausreichende Diskriminationsfahigkeit zur Unterscheidung zwischen DD und gesunden Probanden. Folgerungen | Im Gegensatz zu NTproBNP, MRproANP und CTproET1 waren die Plasmakonzentrationen von GDF-15, MRproADM und CT-proAVP bei Probanden mit einer DD im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe signifikant erhoht. Nach Adjustierung fur Alter, Geschlecht, BMI und GFR war der Zusammenhang der Biomarker zur DD und zu E / e’ nicht mehr nachweisbar. Keiner der untersuchten Biomarker zeigte eine ausreichende diskriminatorische Fahigkeit zur Detektion einer DD.

Aims Galectin-3 is a marker of myocardial fibrosis and mediates aldosterone-induced cardiovascular inflammation and fibrosis. Characteristics of galectin-3 and its response to spironolactone have not been evaluated in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this study was to determine the association between galectin-3 levels and patient characteristics in HFpEF; to evaluate the interaction between spironolactone and galectin-3 levels; and to assess the association between galectin-3 and clinical outcomes. Methods and results Aldo-DHF investigated spironolactone 25 mg once daily vs. placebo for 12 months in patients with NYHA class II–III, LVEF ≥50%, grade ≥ I diastolic dysfunction, and peakVO2 ≤ 25 mL/kg/min. Galectin-3 levels were obtained at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. The association between baseline galectin-3, change in galectin-3, and all-cause death or hospitalization was evaluated, and the interaction between galectin-3 and treatment was assessed. Median baseline galectin-3 was 12.1 ng/mL. After multivariable adjustment, baseline galectin-3 inversely correlated with peak VO2 (P = 0.021), 6 min walk distance (P = 0.002), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical functioning (P = 0.001), and directly correlated with NYHA class (P = 0.007). Baseline NT-proBNP correlated with E/e' velocity ratio (P ≤ 0.001), left atrial volume index (P

Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a common condition with no pharmacological treatment. Physical activity (PA) improves symptoms and quality of life (QoL), but no clear recommendations exist on PA in HFpEF patients. We investigated the association of PA (amount/intensity) on clinical phenotype in HFpEF. Methods and results The Aldosterone in Diastolic Heart Failure trial investigated spironolactone vs. placebo in stable HFpEF patients. At baseline, all patients underwent detailed phenotypization including echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 6 minute walking test (6MWT), and QoL assessment (36‐item Short‐Form questionnaire). PA was assessed by a self‐report questionnaire, classified in metabolic equivalents of task (MET) and analysed with regard to exercise capacity, diastolic function, and QoL. Four hundred twenty‐two patients (52% women, age 67 ± 8 years, New York Heart Association II and III) were classified by weekly MET hours into a low (140) level of PA. Total PA correlated positively with 6MWT distance (r = 0.17; P = 0.002) and physical function of QoL (r = 0.10; P = 0.05), but not with peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2). In contrast, both 6MWT distance and peakVO2 were significantly higher in patients who performed high‐intensity PA for >8 h/week (P

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common disease with high incidence and increasing prevalence. Patients suffer from functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life, and reduced prognosis. A pilot study in a smaller group of HFpEF patients showed that structured, supervised exercise training (ET) improves maximal exercise capacity, diastolic function, and physical quality of life. However, the long-term effects of ET on patient-related outcomes remain unclear in HFpEF. The primary objective of the Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure (Ex-DHF) trial is to investigate whether a 12 month supervised ET can improve a clinically meaningful composite outcome score in HFpEF patients. Components of the outcome score are all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, NYHA functional class, global self-rated health, maximal exercise capacity, and diastolic function. After undergoing baseline assessments to determine whether ET can be performed safely, 320 patients at 11 trial sites with stable HFpEF are randomized 1:1 to supervised ET in addition to usual care or to usual care alone. Patients randomized to ET perform supervised endurance/resistance ET (3 times/week at a certified training centre) for 12 months. At baseline and during follow-up, anthropometry, echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and health-related quality of life evaluation are performed. Blood samples are collected to examine various biomarkers. Overall physical activity, training sessions, and adherence are monitored and documented throughout the study using patient diaries, heart rate monitors, and accelerometers. The Ex-DHF trial is the first multicentre trial to assess the long-term effects of a supervised ET programme on different outcome measures in patients with HFpEF.

The role of biomarkers in asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction (DD) has not been investigated so far. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical associations and the diagnostic property of different biomarkers in patients with asymptomatic DD.Within a population based observational study, healthy participants (50-85 years) with an LVEF ≥ 50 % and no cardiovascular risk factor were prospectively identified. Patients were classified as having either DD (grade ≥ 1, n = 103) or no DD (CON: n = 85). All patients underwent physical examination including medical history, six-minute-walk-testing, QoL (SF-36), comprehensive echocardiography and blood sampling to measure routine values and specified biomarkers (NTproBNP, MRproANP, GDF-15, MRproADM, CTproET1, CTproAVP).In the DD-group plasma concentration of GDF-15 (p = 0,002), MRproADM (p 0,001), and CTproAVP (p = 0,003) were significantly higher than in the CON-group. In contrast, NTproBNP (p = 0,390), MRproANP (p = 287), and CTproET1 (p = 0,393) did not differ. GDF-15, MRproADM and CTproAVP were significantly associated with the presence of DD. However, the significance of the seen associations was lost after multiple adjustments. NTproBNP, MRproANP, and MRproADM were significantly related to E / e' as a continuous measure of diastolic function. The significance of the seen associations was lost after multiple adjustments. In ROC analyses, none of the investigated biomarkers was able to relevantly improve the diagnosis of DD.In patients with asymptomatic DD plasma concentrations of GDF-15, MRproADM and CT-proAVP were significantly higher when compared with controls. In contrast, NTproBNP, MRproANP and CTproET1 did not differ. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI and renal function, no significant association between DD or E / e' and different biomarkers could be observed. Furthermore, none of the investigated biomarkers was able to substantially improve the diagnosis of DD.

Growing evidence suggests that natriuretic peptides play a role in the neurobiology of anxiety. In the present study, we investigated whether in patients with cardiovascular risk factors higher plasma levels of natriuretic peptides are linked to reduced anxiety. A total of 1,360 patients from the observational DIAST-CHF study (mean age 65.9 ± 8.2 years, 48.7 % males, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 60.0 ± 8.2 %) with risk factors for diastolic heart failure were included. Study participants underwent physical examination, echocardiography, and assessment of anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In addition, plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides were measured. Among the total study population, there were n = 117 patients (8.6 %) with HADS anxiety scores above the cut-off (≥11) suggestive of clinically relevant anxiety. In bivariate analyses, we found a significant inverse association between elevated HADS anxiety and log-transformed mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) (p

The long-term effects of exercise training (ET) in diastolic dysfunction (DD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. The present study compared the long-term effects of ET on exercise capacity, diastolic function, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with DD vs. HFpEF.A total of n = 43 patients with asymptomatic DD (n = 19) or HFpEF [DD and New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥II, n = 24] and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% performed a combined endurance/resistance training over 6 months (2-3/week) on top of usual care. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiography, and QoL were obtained at baseline and follow-up.Patients were 62 ± 8 years old (37% female). In the HFpEF group, 67% of patients were in NYHA class II (33% in NYHA III). Exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption, peak VOA structured 6 months ET programme effectively improves exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with DD and overt HFpEF. Therefore, controlled lifestyle modification with physical activity is effective both in DD and HFpEF.

Despite suffering from poor prognosis, progressive exercise intolerance, and impaired quality of life (QoL), effective therapeutic strategies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are sparse. Exercise training (ET) improves physical QoL in HFpEF, but the effects on other aspects of QoL are unknown.The multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure Pilot study included 64 HFpEF patients (65 ± 7 years, 56% female). They were randomized to supervised endurance/resistance training in addition to usual care (ET, n = 44) or usual care alone (UC, n = 20). At baseline and after 3 months, QoL was assessed (36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).Exercise improved the following SF-36 dimensions: physical functioning (p 0.001, p = 0.001 vs. UC), bodily pain (p = 0.046), general health perception (p 0.001, p = 0.016 vs. UC), general mental health (p = 0.002), vitality (p = 0.003), social functioning (p 0.001) physical (p 0.001, p = 0.001 vs. UC), and mental component score (p = 0.030). ET did not improve role limitations due to physical and emotional problems. The MLWHFQ total scale (p 0.001) and the MLWHFQ physical limitation scale (p 0.001, p = 0.04 vs. UC) also improved with ET. The MLWHFQ emotional limitation scale did not change with ET. With ET, also the PHQ-9 total score improved significantly (p = 0.004, p = 0.735 vs. UC).In patients with HFpEF, exercise training improved emotional status, physical and social dimensions of QoL as well as symptoms of depression from pre to post test. Physical dimensions of QoL and general health perception also improved significantly with exercise in comparison to usual care.