Search

Supplemental Figure 1 (fig. S1). Representative whole body NaF-18 PET scan images after 44 days of (A) vehicle-treated and (B) cabozantinib-treated animals. Supplemental Figure 2 (fig. S2). Effect of cabozantinib on PDX tumor growth, animal weight, and survival. Supplemental Figure 3 (fig. S3). Representative images of viable islets of tumor cells in (A) Patients; (B) MDA PCa-118b grown intrafemurally; and (C) MDA PCa- 118b grown subcutaneously. Supplemental Figure 4 (fig. S4). Time-dependent effect of cabozantinib on expression and phosphorylation of primary and MET downstream targets. Supplemental Figure 5 (fig. S5). Relative expression of c-met mRNA in NT and knockdown cells as determined by qRT-PCR. Supplemental Figure 6 (fig. S6). MET expression and activity in NT and knockdown tumors. Supplemental Figure 7 (fig. S7): Quantitation of CD31 staining on bone tumors. Supplemental Figure 8 (fig. S8). Effects of cabozantinib on bone remodeling markers in the phase-2 clinical trial and growth and differentiation of primary osteoblasts. Supplemental Figure S9 (fig S9). Effect of cabozantinib on bone turnover in the Phase 2 trial and PDX grown intrafemurally. Supplemental Figure 10 (fig. S10). Quantitation of phospho-histone H3 staining.

PDF file - 178K

PDF file - 150K, A: Mitotic figures in the xenografts; left panel: graphical presentation of the number of mitotic figures in SCPC/LCNEC xenografts (mean 11 mitoses per high power field) and adenocarcinoma xenografts (mean 2 per high power field); right panel: pictures from H&E stained slides of a SCPC and an adenocarcinoma (AdCa) xenograft. Arrows point to the mitotic figures. B: Higher expression levels of ki67 are noted in the SCPC/LCNEC xenografts and clinical samples compared to adenocarcinomas C:Flow cytometry of SCPC xenograft 146-10 and adenocarcinoma xenograft 180-30. (SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma).

Supplementary Figure S1. Distribution of RET981 cell line. Supplementary Figure S2. Detection of AR splice variants in SDCs. Supplementary Figure S3. Cleaved PARP increased by AR siRNAs.

PDF file - 270K, mRNA levels of A, CDC20 and B, FZR1/CDH1 in SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2) and adenocarcinoma (MDA PCa 170-4 and 180-30) xenografts, normalized to GAPDH. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Purpose: We performed parallel investigations in cabozantinib-treated patients in a phase II trial and simultaneously in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to better understand the roles of MET and VEGFR2 as targets for prostate cancer therapy.Experimental Design: In the clinical trial, radiographic imaging and serum markers were examined, as well as molecular markers in tumors from bone biopsies. In mice harboring PDX intrafemurally or subcutaneously, cabozantinib effects on tumor growth, MET, PDX in which MET was silenced, VEGFR2, bone turnover, angiogenesis, and resistance were examined.Results: In responsive patients and PDX, islets of viable pMET-positive tumor cells persisted, which rapidly regrew after drug withdrawal. Knockdown of MET in PDX did not affect tumor growth in mice nor did it affect cabozantinib-induced growth inhibition but did lead to induction of FGFR1. Inhibition of VEGFR2 and MET in endothelial cells reduced the vasculature, leading to necrosis. However, each islet of viable cells surrounded a VEGFR2-negative vessel. Reduction of bone turnover was observed in both cohorts.Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that MET in tumor cells is not a persistent therapeutic target for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but inhibition of VEGFR2 and MET in endothelial cells and direct effects on osteoblasts are responsible for cabozantinib-induced tumor inhibition. However, vascular heterogeneity represents one source of primary therapy resistance, whereas induction of FGFR1 in tumor cells suggests a potential mechanism of acquired resistance. Thus, integrated cross-species investigations demonstrate the power of combining preclinical models with clinical trials to understand mechanisms of activity and resistance of investigational agents. Clin Cancer Res; 22(1); 107–21. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: To investigate the molecular events associated with the activation of androgen receptor (AR) as a potential therapeutic target in patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC).Experimental Design: Comprehensive molecular and expression analysis of the AR gene in 35 tumor specimens (20 males and 15 females) and cell lines derived from SDC using Western blotting and RT-PCR, FISH analysis, and DNA sequencing was conducted. In vitro and in vivo animal studies were also performed.Results: AR expression was detected in 70% of the tumors and was mainly nuclear and homogenous in both male and female SDCs, although variable cytoplasmic and/or nuclear localization was also found. We report the identification of ligand-independent AR splice variants, mutations, and extra AR gene copy in primary untreated SDC tumors. In contrast to prostate cancer, no AR gene amplification was observed. In vitro knockdown of AR in a female derived SDC cell line revealed marked growth inhibition in culture and in vivo androgen-independent tumor growth.Conclusions: Our study provides new detailed information on the molecular and structural alterations associated with AR gene activation in SDC and sheds more light on the putative functional role of AR in SDC cells. On the basis of these data, we propose that patients with SDC (male and female) can be stratified for hormone-based therapy in future clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6570–81. ©2014 AACR.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1. AVPC ('ANAPLASTIC') ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR NCT00514540, A PHASE II STUDY OF CARBOPLATIN AND DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH ANAPLASTIC PROSTATE CARCINOMA. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2. CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE PDX DONOR PATIENTS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3. PDX GROWTH RATE AND PSA PRODUCTION. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4. ANTIBODIES USED FOR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND WESTERN BLOT. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5. qRT-PCR PRIMER SEQUENCES. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6. DONOR PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 7. SERUM MARKER LEVELS AT TIME OF REGISTRATION TO NCT00514540. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 8. PRINCIPAL COMPONENT VARIATE WEIGHTINGS TCGA/UNSELECTED CRPC/AVPC SAMPLES. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 9. LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS WEIGHTS. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 10. Tp53 MUTATIONS DETECTED IN TCGA, UNSELECTED CRPC (21) AND AVPC SAMPLES.

PDF file - 180K, A, Growth rate of MDA PCA 144-13, 146-10, 155-2, 170-4 and 180-30 xenografts. Note that the MDA PCA 144-13 xenograft line displays a large amount of necrosis. B. Diagram illustrates unsupervised hierarchal clustering using complete linkage and Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis of the raw expression profiles of androgen receptor-positive adenocarcinoma (MDA PCA 130, 117-9, 79) and androgen receptor-negative SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCA 146-10, 155-2, 155-12, 144-13, 144-4) xenografts obtained with Affymetrix HGU133Plus2 array. In red are samples assessed on 1 day and in blue, those assessed on a different day. B, diagram illustrates Gene Ontology analysis results showing enrichment in biologic-process subtrees related to mitosis among the differently expressed genes. The biological processes that reached statistical significance are highlighted in red. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Supplementary Table S1. PCR primer sequences in this study. Supplementary Table S2. AR IHC and FISH result Supplementary Table S3. AR mutation detail result in this study.

PDF file - 48K

Purpose: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology.Experimental Design: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors.Results: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts.Conclusion: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 666–77. ©2011 AACR.

PDF file - 1.1MB, A, Chromosomal regions commonly amplified (red) and deleted (blue) in the SCPC/LCNEC (left panel) and adenocarcinoma (AdCa, right panel) xenografts. B, AR, cyclin D1, and RB1 promoter methylation of the AR-positive LNCaP prostate cancer cell line, the AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, and the SCPC/LCNEC MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2 xenografts. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; AR, androgen receptor; RB, retinoblastoma.

Purpose: To study Wnt/β-catenin in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and understand its function independently of the β-catenin–androgen receptor (AR) interaction.Experimental Design: We carried out β-catenin immunocytochemical analysis, evaluated TOP-flash reporter activity (a reporter of β-catenin–mediated transcription), and sequenced the β-catenin gene in MDA prostate cancer 118a, MDA prostate cancer 118b, MDA prostate cancer 2b, and PC-3 prostate cancer cells. We knocked down β-catenin in AR-negative MDA prostate cancer 118b cells and carried out comparative gene-array analysis. We also immunohistochemically analyzed β-catenin and AR in 27 bone metastases of human CRPCs.Results: β-Catenin nuclear accumulation and TOP-flash reporter activity were high in MDA prostate cancer 118b but not in MDA prostate cancer 2b or PC-3 cells. MDA prostate cancer 118a and MDA prostate cancer 118b cells carry a mutated β-catenin at codon 32 (D32G). Ten genes were expressed differently (false discovery rate, 0.05) in MDA prostate cancer 118b cells with downregulated β-catenin. One such gene, hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), synthesizes hyaluronan, a core component of the extracellular matrix. We confirmed HAS2 upregulation in PC-3 cells transfected with D32G-mutant β-catenin. Finally, we found nuclear localization of β-catenin in 10 of 27 human tissue specimens; this localization was inversely associated with AR expression (P = 0.056, Fisher's exact test), suggesting that reduced AR expression enables Wnt/β-catenin signaling.Conclusion: We identified a previously unknown downstream target of β-catenin, HAS2, in prostate cancer, and found that high β-catenin nuclear localization and low or no AR expression may define a subpopulation of men with bone metastatic prostate cancer. These findings may guide physicians in managing these patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 726–36. ©2011 AACR.

supplementary materials and methods, supplementary tables and supplementary figure legends Supplemental Table 1: Patient Characteristics. Supplemental Table 2: Targeting sequences for c-met. Supplemental Table 3: Antibodies and Sources. Supplemental Table 4: Oligonucleotides for PCR Amplification of Mouse Alkaline Phosphatase and Osteonectin.

Supplementary Figure 1. Supervised hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes between typical CRPC PDX ("ADENO") and CRPC PDX with small cell carcinoma morphology ("SCPC"). Supplementary Figure 2. Morphologic spectrum of tumors of patients with the aggressive variant phenotype in the primary (A-D) and metastatic tumor sites (E-H) Supplementary Figure 3. Immunohistochemical analysis of all 59 available NCT00514540 samples and 8 PDX lines. Supplementary Figure 4. Principal component analysis of a16-serum-and-IHC-tumor-marker set in "Baseline" samples from 21 patients. Supplementary Figure 5. Total number of copy number alterations per sample. Supplementary Figure 6. mRNA levels of genes of interest. Supplementary Figure 7. Principal component analysis of a 10-CNA-marker set in TCGA, unsupervised CRPC and AVPC samples.

Purpose: Morphologically heterogeneous prostate cancers that behave clinically like small-cell prostate cancers (SCPC) share their chemotherapy responsiveness. We asked whether these clinically defined, morphologically diverse, “aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC)” also share molecular features with SCPC.Experimental Design: Fifty-nine prostate cancer samples from 40 clinical trial participants meeting AVPC criteria, and 8 patient-tumor derived xenografts (PDX) from 6 of them, were stained for markers aberrantly expressed in SCPC. DNA from 36 and 8 PDX was analyzed by Oncoscan for copy number gains (CNG) and losses (CNL). We used the AVPC PDX to expand observations and referenced publicly available datasets to arrive at a candidate molecular signature for the AVPC.Results: Irrespective of morphology, Ki67 and Tp53 stained ≥10% cells in 80% and 41% of samples, respectively. RB1 stained MYC (surrogate for 8q) CNG and RB1 CNL showed in 54% of 44 samples each and PTEN CNL in 48%. All but 1 of 8 PDX bore Tp53 missense mutations. RB1 CNL was the strongest discriminator between unselected castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the AVPC. Combined alterations in RB1, Tp53, and/or PTEN were more frequent in the AVPC than in unselected CRPC and in The Cancer Genome Atlas samples.Conclusions: Clinically defined AVPC share molecular features with SCPC and are characterized by combined alterations in RB1, Tp53, and/or PTEN. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1520–30. ©2015 AACR.

IHC, qRT-PCR and Western blot methods.

Supplementary Figure Legends 1-4 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis

Supplementary Figures 1-4 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis

Supplementary Table 1 from BMP4 Promotes Prostate Tumor Growth in Bone through Osteogenesis

Unsupervised clustering and deconvolution analysis identifies three intrinsic subtypes of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (M-CRPC): AR pathway-positive Prostate Cancer (ARPC), Neuro Endocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC), and a novel subtype endowed with hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) and luminal progenitor-like traits (Mesenchymal and Stem-like PC, MSPC). Analysis of large patient datasets and in vitro studies support the notion that MSPC originates from ARPC as a consequence of therapy-induced lineage plasticity. Intriguingly, AR blockade instigates two separate and complementary processes: 1) transcriptional silencing of TP53 and hence acquisition of hybrid E/M and stem-like traits; and 2) inhibition of the BMP-SMAD pathway, which promotes resistance to the pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects of AR inhibition. MSPC cell lines and prostate adenocarcinoma cells reprogrammed in vitro to MSPC exhibit a marked dependency on HER2/3 signaling. Moreover, combinations of the panHER inhibitor neratinib with enzalutamide or the mTORC1 inhibitor MLN0128 exhibit efficacy in preclinical models of mixed ARPC/MSPC or MSPC, respectively. Collectively, these results identify a novel subtype of M-CRPC, trace its origin to therapy induced lineage plasticity, and reveal its dependency on HER2/3 signaling.

SummaryUnsupervised clustering and deconvolution analysis identifies a novel subtype of M-CRPC endowed with hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) and luminal progenitor-like traits (Mesenchymal and Stem-like PC, MSPC). Analysis of patient datasets and mechanistic studies indicate that MSPC arises as a consequence of therapy-induced lineage plasticity. AR blockade instigates two separate and complementary processes: 1) transcriptional silencing of TP53 and hence acquisition of hybrid E/M and stem-like traits; and 2) inhibition of the BMP signaling, which promotes resistance to the pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects of AR inhibition. The drug-tolerant prostate cancer cells generated through reprogramming are rescued by neuregulin and generate metastases in mice. Combined inhibition of HER2/3 and AR or mTORC1 exhibit efficacy in preclinical models of mixed ARPC/MSPC or MSPC, respectively. These results identify a novel subtype of M-CRPC, trace its origin to therapy-induced lineage plasticity, and reveal its dependency on HER2/3 signaling.

While the antiandrogen enzalutamide (Enz) extends the castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients’ survival an extra 4.8 months, it might also result in some adverse effects via inducing the neuroendocrine differentiation (NED). Here we found that lncRNA-p21 is highly expressed in the NEPC patients derived xenograft tissues (NEPC-PDX). Results from cell lines and human clinical sample surveys also revealed that lncRNA-p21 expression is up-regulated in NEPC and Enz treatment could increase the lncRNA-p21 to induce the NED. Mechanism dissection revealed that Enz could promote the lncRNA-p21 transcription via altering the androgen receptor (AR) binding to different androgen-response-elements, which switch the EZH2 function from histone-methyltransferase to non-histone methyltransferase, consequently methylating the STAT3 to promote the NED. Preclinical studies using the PDX mouse model proved that EZH2 inhibitor could block the Enz-induced NED. Together, these results suggest targeting the Enz/AR/lncRNA-p21/EZH2/STAT3 signaling may help urologists to develop a treatment for better suppression of the human CRPC progression., The induction of neuroendocrine differentiation occurs in enzalutamide treated castration resistant prostate cancer. Here, the authors show that lncRNA-21 mediates enzalutamide induced neuroendocrine differentiation through EZH2/STAT axis and EZH2 inhibition suppresses this differentiation.

Background Patients with advanced primary and recurrent salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), a rare and lethal malignancy, have limited therapeutic options. Novel small-molecule agents aimed at targeting critical signaling associated with SDC tumorigenesis may lead to new therapeutic options for patients with these tumors. The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) axis, an important oncogenic pathway, has been targeted for therapy in several solid tumors. Currently, little is known about the role and clinical implications of alterations of the HER2/PI3K pathway in patients with SDC. Methods The authors investigated the clinicopathologic features, genetic alterations, and expression of key members of the HER2/PI3K pathway in 43 primary tumors and conducted in vitro functional and targeted drug-response analyses on cell lines derived from salivary epithelial carcinomas. Results In primary tumors, loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression was identified in 22 of 43 tumors (51%), overexpression of HER2 was observed in 12 of 43 tumors (28%), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations were identified in 12 of 43 tumors (28%). Phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-AKT) was highly expressed in most tumors. Most tumors (70%) displayed mutually exclusive alterations of PI3K members, whereas 8 tumors (19%) had 2 or more concurrent abnormalities. In vitro studies demonstrated a direct association between PTEN loss and PI3K pathway activation and evidence of response to combined PI3Kα and PI3Kβ and/or pan-PI3K inhibitors. Conclusions The current analyses reveal frequent PTEN loss and mutually exclusive alterations of key PI3K pathway members in SDC and demonstrate in vitro evidence of a response to pan-PI3K inhibitors. These results provide a framework for a biomarker-based substratification of patients with SDC in future targeted therapy. Cancer 2018;124:3523-32. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

PURPOSE: Androgen receptor (AR) signaling affects prostate cancer (PCa) growth, metabolism and progression. Often PCa progresses from androgen-sensitive to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) following androgen-deprivation therapy. Clinicopathologic and genomic characterizations of CRPC tumors lead to subdividing CRPC into two subtypes: 1) AR-dependent CRPC containing dysregulation of AR signaling alterations in AR such as amplification, point mutations and/or generation of splice variants in the AR gene, and 2) an aggressive variant PCa (AVPC) subtype that is phenotypically similar to small cell prostate cancer and is defined by chemotherapy sensitivity, gain of neuroendocrine or pro-neural marker expression, loss of AR expression, and combined alterations of PTEN, TP53, and RB1 tumor suppressors. Previously, we reported patient derived xenograft (PDX) animal models that contain characteristics of these CRPC subtypes. In this study, we have employed the PDX models to test metabolic alterations in the CRPC subtypes. PROCEDURES: Mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis along with in vivo hyperpolarized 1-[(13)C]pyruvate spectroscopy experiments were performed on prostate PDX animal models. RESULTS: Using hyperpolarized 1-[(13)C]pyruvate conversion to 1-[(13)C]lactate in vivo as well as lactate measurements ex vivo, we have found increased lactate production in AR-dependent CRPC PDX models even under low-hormone levels (castrated mouse) compared to AR negative AVPC PDX models. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis underscores the potential of hyperpolarized metabolic imaging in determining the underlying biology and in vivo phenotyping of CRPC.

The CCAAT-binding factor CBF/NF-Y is needed for cell proliferation and early embryonic development. NF-Y can regulate the expression of different cell type-specific genes that are activated by various physiological signaling pathways. Dysregulation of NF-Y was observed in pathogenic conditions in humans such as scleroderma, neurodegenerative disease, and cancer. Conditional inactivation of the NF-YA gene in mice demonstrated that NF-Y activity is essential for normal tissue homeostasis, survival, and metabolic function. Altogether, NF-Y is an essential transcription factor that plays a critical role in mammalian development, from the early stages to adulthood, and in human pathogenesis. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Nuclear Factor Y in Development and Disease, edited by Prof. Roberto Mantovani.

Cell division cycle 6 (CDC6), an androgen receptor (AR) target gene, is implicated in regulating DNA replication and checkpoint mechanisms. CDC6 expression is increased during prostate cancer (PCa) progression and positively correlates with AR in PCa tissues. AR or CDC6 knockdown, together with AZD7762, a Chk1/2 inhibitor, results in decreased TopBP1-ATR-Chk1 signaling and markedly increased ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) phosphorylation, a biomarker of DNA damage, and synergistically increases treatment efficacy. Combination treatment with the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide (ENZ) and the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 demonstrates synergy with regard to inhibition of AR-CDC6-ATR-Chk1 signaling, ATM phosphorylation induction, and apoptosis in VCaP (mutant p53) and LNCaP-C4-2b (wild-type p53) cells. CDC6 overexpression significantly reduced ENZ- and AZD7762-induced apoptosis. Additive or synergistic therapeutic activities are demonstrated in AR-positive animal xenograft models. These findings have important clinical implications, since they introduce a therapeutic strategy for AR-positive, metastatic, castration-resistant PCa, regardless of p53 status, through targeting AR-CDC6-ATR-Chk1 signaling.

Purpose: Morphologically heterogeneous prostate cancers that behave clinically like small-cell prostate cancers (SCPC) share their chemotherapy responsiveness. We asked whether these clinically defined, morphologically diverse, “aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC)” also share molecular features with SCPC. Experimental Design: Fifty-nine prostate cancer samples from 40 clinical trial participants meeting AVPC criteria, and 8 patient-tumor derived xenografts (PDX) from 6 of them, were stained for markers aberrantly expressed in SCPC. DNA from 36 and 8 PDX was analyzed by Oncoscan for copy number gains (CNG) and losses (CNL). We used the AVPC PDX to expand observations and referenced publicly available datasets to arrive at a candidate molecular signature for the AVPC. Results: Irrespective of morphology, Ki67 and Tp53 stained ≥10% cells in 80% and 41% of samples, respectively. RB1 stained Conclusions: Clinically defined AVPC share molecular features with SCPC and are characterized by combined alterations in RB1, Tp53, and/or PTEN. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1520–30. ©2015 AACR.

Advanced prostate adenocarcinomas enriched in stem-cell features, as well as variant androgen receptor (AR)-negative neuroendocrine (NE)/small-cell prostate cancers are difficult to treat, and account for up to 30% of prostate cancer-related deaths every year. While existing therapies for prostate cancer such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), destroy the bulk of the AR-positive cells within the tumor, eradicating this population eventually leads to castration-resistance, owing to the continued survival of AR-/lo stem-like cells. In this study, we identified a critical nexus between p38MAPK signaling, and the transcription factor Forkhead Box Protein C2 (FOXC2) known to promote cancer stem-cells and metastasis. We demonstrate that prostate cancer cells that are insensitive to ADT, as well as high-grade/NE prostate tumors, are characterized by elevated FOXC2, and that targeting FOXC2 using a well-tolerated p38 inhibitor restores epithelial attributes and ADT-sensitivity, and reduces the shedding of circulating tumor cells in vivo with significant shrinkage in the tumor mass. This study thus specifies a tangible mechanism to target the AR-/lo population of prostate cancer cells with stem-cell properties.

Neuroendocrine/Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancers are lethal variants of the disease, with an aggressive clinical course and very short responses to conventional therapy. The age-adjusted incidence rate for this tumor sub-type has steadily increased over the past 20 years in the United States, with no reduction in the associated mortality rate. The molecular networks fueling its emergence and sustenance are still obscure; however, many factors have been associated with the onset and progression of neuroendocrine differentiation in clinically typical adenocarcinomas including loss of androgen-receptor expression and/or signaling, conventional therapy, and dysregulated cytokine function. “Tumor-plasticity” and the ability to dedifferentiate into alternate cell lineages are central to this process. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) signaling pathways are major promoters of stem-cell properties in prostate tumor cells. In this review, we examine the contributions of EMT-induced cellular-plasticity and stem-cell signaling pathways to the progression of Neuroendocrine/Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancers in the light of potential therapeutic opportunities.

Combined loss of tumor suppressors (TSPs) PTEN, TP53, and RB1 is highly associated with small cell carcinoma of prostate phenotype. Recent genomic studies of human tumors as well as analyses in mouse genetic models have revealed a unique role for these TSPs in dictating epithelial lineage plasticity – a phenomenon that plays a critical role in the development of aggressive variant prostate cancer and associated androgen therapy resistance. Here, we summarize recently published key observations on this topic, and hypothesize a possible mechanism by which concurrent loss of TSPs could potentially regulate the prostate cancer disease phenotype.

Prostate cancer (PCa) bone metastasis is frequently associated with bone-forming lesions, but the source of the osteoblastic lesions remains unclear. We show that the tumor-induced bone derives partly from tumor-associated endothelial cells that have undergone endothelial-to-osteoblast (EC-to-OSB) conversion. The tumor-associated osteoblasts in PCa bone metastasis specimens and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were found to co-express endothelial marker Tie-2. BMP4, identified in PDX-conditioned medium, promoted EC-to-OSB conversion of 2H11 endothelial cells. BMP4 overexpression in non-osteogenic C4-2b PCa cells led to ectopic bone formation under subcutaneous implantation. Tumor-induced bone was reduced in trigenic mice (Tie2cre/Osxf/f/SCID) with endothelial-specific deletion of osteoblast cell-fate determinant OSX compared with bigenic mice (Osxf/f/SCID). Thus, tumor-induced EC-to-OSB conversion is one mechanism that leads to osteoblastic bone metastasis of PCa.

Cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1) is a validated treatment target for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Abiraterone acetate (AA) inhibits both 17α-hydroxylase (hydroxylase) and 17,20-lyase (lyase) reactions catalyzed by CYP17A1 and thus depletes androgen biosynthesis. However, coadministration of prednisone is required to suppress the mineralocorticoid excess and cortisol depletion that result from hydroxylase inhibition. VT-464, a nonsteroidal small molecule, selectively inhibits CYP17A1 lyase and therefore does not require prednisone supplementation. Administration of VT-464 in a metastatic CRPC patient presenting with high tumoral expression of both androgen receptor (AR) and CYP17A1, showed significant reduction in the level of both dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and serum PSA. Treatment of a CRPC patient-derived xenograft, MDA-PCa-133 expressing H874Y AR mutant with VT-464, reduced the increase in tumor volume in castrate male mice more than twice as much as the vehicle (P

The mammalian central nervous system (CNS) contains various types of neurons with different neuronal functions. In contrast to established roles of cell type-specific transcription factors on neuronal specification and maintenance, whether ubiquitous transcription factors have conserved or differential neuronal function remains uncertain. Here, we revealed that inactivation of a ubiquitous factor NF-Y in different sets of neurons resulted in cell type-specific neuropathologies and gene downregulation in mouse CNS. In striatal and cerebellar neurons, NF-Y inactivation led to ubiquitin/p62 pathologies with downregulation of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone Grp94, as we previously observed by NF-Y deletion in cortical neurons. In contrast, NF-Y inactivation in motor neurons induced neuronal loss without obvious protein deposition. Detailed analysis clarified downregulation of another ER chaperone Grp78 in addition to Grp94 in motor neurons and knockdown of both ER chaperones in motor neurons recapitulated the pathology observed after NF-Y inactivation. Finally, additional downregulation of Grp78 in striatal neurons suppressed ubiquitin accumulation induced by NF-Y inactivation, implying that selective ER chaperone downregulation mediates different neuropathologies. Our data suggest distinct roles of NF-Y in protein homeostasis and neuronal maintenance in the CNS by differential regulation of ER chaperone expression.

Recently, many therapeutic agents for prostate cancer have been approved that target the androgen receptor and/or the prostate tumor microenvironment. Each of these therapies has modestly increased patient survival. A better understanding of when in the course of prostate cancer progression specific therapies should be applied, and of what biomarkers would indicate when resistance arises, would almost certainly improve survival due to these therapies. Thus, applying the armamentarium of therapeutic agents in the right sequences in the right combination at the right time is a major goal in prostate cancer treatment. For this to occur, an understanding of prostate cancer evolution during progression is required. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of prostate cancer progression, but challenge the prevailing view by proposing a new model of prostate cancer progression, with the goal of improving biologic classification and treatment strategies. We use this model to discuss how integrating clinical and basic understanding of prostate cancer will lead to better implementation of molecularly targeted therapeutics and improve patient survival. Significance: Rapid development of drugs with efficacy against prostate cancer now makes it possible to consider applying these agents with curative intent in men with currently incurable cancers. However, when to apply these new drugs, as well as those under development, to obtain the best outcomes is a challenge that must be addressed. To meet this challenge, better classification of the disease based on the underlying molecular mechanisms of progression will facilitate the implementation of current and emerging therapies. Cancer Discov; 3(8); 849–61. ©2013 AACR.

BACKGROUND The interplay between androgen and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways may be associated with prostate cancer progression and resistance to therapy. METHODS Tissue microarrays from prostatectomy specimens were derived from 53 patients treated preoperatively with androgen ablation (AA) with or without chemotherapy, and from 26 stage- and grade-matched controls. A previously characterized androgen-regulated human prostate cancer xenograft was used to conduct parallel murine studies. Expression of markers of interest was determined on both untreated and castrated tumors. RESULTS Four-month exposure to AA or AA with chemotherapy led to a uniform increase in Hh signaling as compared to controls, paired with an inverse trend of androgen receptor (AR) and CYP17 expression in clinically derived specimens. Changes in the expression profiles of Hh signaling were observed in the epithelium and stroma, in response to genotoxic stress of androgen ablation and chemotherapy. A reduced expression of KI67 and increased bcl2 expression was observed in the malignant epithelial compartment. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evidence that Hh signaling is induced by AA or the combination of AA and chemotherapy and, by inference, contributes to castrate-resistant progression of prostate cancer as supported by parallel human and murine studies. These data are in agreement with previous reports that implicate Hh signaling in castrate-resistant progression of prostate cancer. Based on these findings, we are pursuing parallel clinical and murine investigations to determine if Hh signaling inhibition combined with AA will be more effective than AA alone. Prostate 73: 153–161, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Induction of new bone formation is frequently seen in the bone lesions from prostate cancer. However, whether osteogenesis is necessary for prostate tumor growth in bone is unknown. Recently, 2 xenografts, MDA-PCa-118b and MDA-PCa-133, were generated from prostate cancer bone metastases. When implanted subcutaneously in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, MDA-PCa-118b induced strong ectopic bone formation while MDA-PCa-133 did not. To identify the factors that are involved in bone formation, we compared the expression of secreted factors (secretome) from MDA-PCa-118b and MDA-PCa-133 by cytokine array. We found that the osteogenic MDA-PCa-118b xenograft expressed higher levels of bone morphogenetic protein BMP4 and several cytokines including interleukin-8, growth-related protein (GRO), and CCL2. We showed that BMP4 secreted from MDA-PCa-118b contributed to about a third of the osteogenic differentiation seen in MDA-PCa-118b tumors. The conditioned media from MDA-PCa-118b induced a higher level of osteoblast differentiation, which was significantly reduced by treatment with BMP4 neutralizing antibody or the small molecule BMP receptor 1 inhibitor LDN-193189. BMP4 did not elicit an autocrine effect on MDA-PCa-118b, which expressed low to undetectable levels of BMP receptors. Treatment of SCID mice bearing MDA-PCa-118b tumors with LDN-193189 significantly reduced tumor growth. Thus, these studies support a role of BMP4-mediated osteogenesis in the progression of prostate cancer in bone. Cancer Res; 71(15); 5194–203. ©2011 AACR.

Prostate cancer (PCa) accounts for approximately 26,730 deaths each year in the United States. The tremendous heterogeneity observed among prostate cancers contributes to the enormous clinical challenge. Among these tumors, variant Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancers (NEPC) account for up to a third of prostate cancer-related deaths. These tumors are enriched with cancer cells with stem-cell properties (CSCs). Prostate CSCs lack the expression of androgen-receptor (AR), and are hence resistant to AR inhibition. In addition, CSCs are capable of sustaining tumor relapse and metastasis. We previously demonstrated that aberrant induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in differentiated prostate epithelial cells could result in the activation of CSC features, including ADT resistance and NEPC attributes. Using multiple prostate cancer cell lines as well as patient-derived xenograft samples, we demonstrated a reciprocal relationship between the EMT/CSC phenotype and expression of AR, and also observed a vital role for the central EMT regulator FOXC2 (Forkhead transcription factor C2) in the generation/maintenance of AR-negative CSCs, which are in turn responsible for the formation of NEPCs. We therefore sought to identify conserved EMT-signaling pathways necessary for EMT and neuroendocrine trans-differentiation in PCa cells, and investigate if targeting EMT-promoting pathways renders CSC-enriched PCa cells sensitive to ADT. We demonstrate that FOXC2 is a direct target of p38MAPK (a pleiotropic kinase), and that the p38-FOXC2 signaling cascade is indispensable for NEPC attributes and associated stem-cell functions. Targeting the p38 pathway using a systemic small-molecule inhibitor in animal models in vivo induced epithelial differentiation in NEPCs and indeed rendered them sensitive to androgen-deprivation therapy using enzalutamide, via loss of FOXC2 function. This study therefore highlights a novel (and targetable) signaling pathway that fosters CSC-associated drug resistance in NEPC, and a pioneering treatment potential for patients with NEPC. Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. Nupam Mahajan (Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa), Dr. Ignacio Wistuba, Dr. Jaime Rodriguez-Canales, Dr. Sue-Hwa Lin (Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MDACC, Houston) and Dr. Dean Tang (Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, MDACC, Smithville) for their contributions. We thank the UTMDACC Prostate Cancer SPORE for financial support (RS, SM). Citation Format: Rama Soundararajan, Anurag Paranjape, Robiya Joseph, Neeraja Bhangre, Ana Aparicio, Sankar Maity, Christopher Logothetis, Jeffrey Chang, Sendurai Mani. Modulating a cancer stem cell-specific signaling pathway to reverse the course of neuroendocrine prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A065.

Previously the analysis of promoters regulated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress identified a composite promoter element, ERSE that interacts with both CBF/NF-Y (CBF) and ATF6(N) transcription factors. This prompted us to investigate the underlying mechanism by which CBF, a ubiquitously binding transcription factor, specifically controls transcription activation during ER stress. The in vitro DNA binding study performed using purified recombinant proteins revealed that CBF specifically recruits ATF6(N) to ERSE DNA but it does not interact with ATF6(N) in absence of DNA binding. Inhibition of CBF binding resulted in a significant reduction of optimal transcription activation of cellular genes during ER stress. Analysis of cellular promoters by ChIP demonstrated that CBF is needed for recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not for either acetylation of histone H3-K9 or trimethylation of histone H3-K4 during ER stress. Together these study results reveal that CBF controls ER stress-inducible transcription through recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not through chromatin modifications. Our observations are in agreement with the results of recently published studies that have shown that CBF controls transcription of varieties of inducible promoters through recruitment of general transcription factors but not through acetylation of histone H4. These findings provide a paradigm of the function of CBF in inducible transcription. J. Cell. Biochem. 104: 1708–1723, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Roles for SOX9 have been extensively studied in development and particular emphasis has been placed on SOX9 roles in cell lineage determination in a number of discrete tissues. Aberrant expression of SOX9 in many cancers, including colorectal cancer, suggests roles in these diseases as well and recent studies have suggested tissue- and context-specific roles of SOX9. Our genome wide approach by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) in human colorectal cancer cells identified a number of physiological targets of SOX9, including ubiquitously expressed cell cycle regulatory genes, such as CCNB1 and CCNB2, CDK1, and TOP2A. These novel high affinity-SOX9 binding peaks precisely overlapped with binding sites for histone-fold NF-Y transcription factor. Furthermore, our data showed that SOX9 is recruited by NF-Y to these promoters of cell cycle regulatory genes and that SOX9 is critical for the full function of NF-Y in activation of the cell cycle genes. Mutagenesis analysis and in vitro binding assays provided additional evidence to show that SOX9 affinity is through NF-Y and that SOX9 DNA binding domain is not necessary for SOX9 affinity to those target genes. Collectively, our results reveal possibly a context-dependent, non-classical regulatory role for SOX9.

A distinct feature of human prostate cancer (PCa) is the development of osteoblastic (bone- forming) bone metastases. Metastatic growth in the bone is supported by factors secreted by PCa cells that activate signaling networks in the tumor microenvironment that augment tumor growth. To better understand these signaling networks and identify potential targets for therapy of bone metastases, we characterized the secretome of a patient-derived xenograft, MDA-PCa-118b (PCa-118b), generated from osteoblastic bone lesion. PCa-118b induces osteoblastic tumors when implanted either in mouse femurs or subcutaneously. To study signaling molecules critical to these unique tumor/microenvironment-mediated events, we performed mass spectrometry on conditioned media of isolated PCa-118b tumor cells, and identified 26 secretory proteins, such as TGF- β2, GDF15, FGF3, FGF19, CXCL1, galectins, and β2-microglobulin, which represent both novel and previously published secreted proteins. RT- PCR using human versus mouse-specific primers showed that TGFβ2, GDF15, FGF3, FGF19, and CXCL1 were secreted from PCa-118b cells. TGFβ2, GDF15, FGF3, and FGF19 function as both autocrine and paracrine factors on tumor cells and stromal cells, that is, endothelial cells and osteoblasts. In contrast, CXCL1 functions as a paracrine factor through the CXCR2 receptor expressed on endothelial cells and osteoblasts. Thus, our study reveals a complex PCa bone metastasis secretome with paracrine and autocrine signaling functions that mediate cross-talk among multiple cell types within the tumor microenvironment.

Purpose: To investigate the molecular events associated with the activation of androgen receptor (AR) as a potential therapeutic target in patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). Experimental Design: Comprehensive molecular and expression analysis of the AR gene in 35 tumor specimens (20 males and 15 females) and cell lines derived from SDC using Western blotting and RT-PCR, FISH analysis, and DNA sequencing was conducted. In vitro and in vivo animal studies were also performed. Results: AR expression was detected in 70% of the tumors and was mainly nuclear and homogenous in both male and female SDCs, although variable cytoplasmic and/or nuclear localization was also found. We report the identification of ligand-independent AR splice variants, mutations, and extra AR gene copy in primary untreated SDC tumors. In contrast to prostate cancer, no AR gene amplification was observed. In vitro knockdown of AR in a female derived SDC cell line revealed marked growth inhibition in culture and in vivo androgen-independent tumor growth. Conclusions: Our study provides new detailed information on the molecular and structural alterations associated with AR gene activation in SDC and sheds more light on the putative functional role of AR in SDC cells. On the basis of these data, we propose that patients with SDC (male and female) can be stratified for hormone-based therapy in future clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6570–81. ©2014 AACR.

To understand the role of the CCAAT-binding factor, CBF, in transcription, we developed a strategy to purify the heterotrimeric CBF complex from HeLa cell extracts using two successive immunoaffinity chromatography steps. Here we show that the p32 protein, previously identified as the ASF/SF2 splicing factor-associated protein, copurified with the CBF complex. Studies of protein–protein interaction demonstrated that p32 interacts specifically with CBF–B subunit and also associates with CBF–DNA complex. Cellular localization by immunofluorescence staining revealed that p32 is present in the cell throughout the cytosol and nucleus, whereas CBF is present primarily in the nucleus. A portion of the p32 colocalizes with CBF-B in the nucleus. Interestingly, reconstitution of p32 in an in vitro transcription reaction demonstrated that p32 specifically inhibits CBF-mediated transcription activation. Altogether, our study identified p32 as a novel and specific corepressor of CBF-mediated transcription activation in vitro.

To understand the role of the CCAAT binding factor (CBF) in transcription during the cell cycle, we studied the mouse topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) promoter, which is activated during the late S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle and contains multiple CBF binding sites. Mutational analysis of the promoter shows that CBF binding to an inverted orientation of the CCAAT motif in the topo IIα promoter, but not to a direct orientation, is required for transcription activation during the cell cycle. In contrast, analysis of the promoter in an in vitroreconstituted transcription system shows that CBF activates transcription of the topo IIα promoter irrespective of the orientation of the CBF binding sites. This analysis demonstrates that only one of the three transcription start sites of the topo IIα promoter is stimulated by CBF, indicating that transcription activation by CBF is dependent on basal promoter structure. Interestingly, mutations of the start site that abolish CBF-dependent transcription activation in vitro do not inhibit activation of the promoter during the cell cycle. Consistent with this observation, expression of a truncated CBF-B subunit lacking a transcription activation domain, which inhibits activity of a collagen promoter, does not affect activity of the topo IIα promoter in fibroblast cells. In contrast, expression of an allele-specific CBF-B mutant that binds high affinity to a mutant CBF binding site containing a CCAAC motif revives transcription activation of an inactive mutant topo IIα promoter containing CCAAC during the cell cycle. Altogether, this study indicates that CBF binding, but not conventional CBF activation domains, are required for activation of the topo IIα promoter during the cell cycle. Considering these results together with results of another recent study, we hypothesize that binding of CBF that disrupts the nucleosomal structure in the topo IIα promoter is a major function of CBF by which it regulates the cell cycle-dependent transcription of the topo IIα promoter and possibly many other cell cycle-regulated promoters containing CBF binding sites.